- 1Psychiatry Division, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
- 2Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- 3Department of Medical, Pfizer Italia, Rome, Italy
Introduction: Insomnia is a stress-related sleep disorder, may favor a state of allostatic overload impairing brain neuroplasticity, stress immune and endocrine pathways, and may contribute to mental and physical disorders. In this framework, assessing and targeting insomnia is of importance.
Aim: Since maladaptive neuroplasticity and allostatic overload are hypothesized to be related to GABAergic alterations, compounds targeting GABA may play a key role. Accordingly, the aim of this review was to discuss the effect of GABAA receptor agonists, short-medium acting hypnotic benzodiazepines and the so called Z-drugs, at a molecular level.
Method: Literature searches were done according to PRISMA guidelines. Several combinations of terms were used such as “hypnotic benzodiazepines” or “brotizolam,” or “lormetazepam” or “temazepam” or “triazolam” or “zolpidem” or “zopiclone” or “zaleplon” or “eszopiclone” and “insomnia” and “effects on sleep” and “effect on brain plasticity” and “effect on stress system”. Given the complexity and heterogeneity of existing literature, we ended up with a narrative review.
Results: Among short-medium acting compounds, triazolam has been the most studied and may regulate the stress system at central and peripheral levels. Among Z-drugs eszopiclone may regulate the stress system. Some compounds may produce more “physiological” sleep such as brotizolam, triazolam, and eszopiclone and probably may not impair sleep processes and related neural plasticity. In particular, triazolam, eszopiclone, and zaleplon studied in vivo in animal models did not alter neuroplasticity.
Conclusion: Current models of insomnia may lead us to revise the way in which we use hypnotic compounds in clinical practice. Specifically, compounds should target sleep processes, the stress system, and sustain neural plasticity. In this framework, among the short/medium acting hypnotic benzodiazepines, triazolam has been the most studied compound while among the Z-drugs eszopiclone has demonstrated interesting effects. Both offer potential new insight for treating insomnia.
Introduction
Insomnia is the most frequent among sleep and psychiatric disorders and may affect more than 30% of the population in industrialized countries (American Psychiatric Association, 2013), with an overall increase during the COVID-19 pandemic in around 55% of the population (Morin and Carrier, 2021).
While sleep is essential for brain homeostasis, brain plasticity, and mental and physical health (Cirelli and Tononi, 2017; de Vivo et al., 2017; Ramar et al., 2021) chronic insomnia may favor a state of allostatic overload impairing neural plasticity, immune and endocrine pathways, and may contribute to mental and physical disorders (Fernandez-Mendoza and Vgontzas, 2013; Hertenstein et al., 2019; Lo Martire et al., 2020; Nobre et al., 2021; Van Someren, 2021).
Insomnia symptoms may hold detrimental daytime consequences and may be associated with more than twice the odds of having a comorbid condition including heart disease or hypertension, and has been strongly associated with neuropsychiatric and mental disorders including neurodegenerative diseases, depression, and anxiety, independently increasing suicidal risk (Pigeon et al., 2012; Fernandez-Mendoza and Vgontzas, 2013; Hertenstein et al., 2019; Nobre et al., 2021). Due to its chronicity, insomnia may substantially impair quality of life and global functioning.
Within this framework, assessing and targeting insomnia is of great importance. In particular recent studies demonstrated that pharmacological and psychological interventions for insomnia may impact favorably on the trajectory of psychiatric and medical disorders (Manber et al., 2011; Dallaspezia and Benedetti, 2015; Cosgrave et al., 2018; Geoffroy et al., 2018; Benard et al., 2019).
Recent guidelines for the diagnosis and management of insomnia disorder (Riemann et al., 2017; Sateia et al., 2017; Wilson et al., 2019; Palagini et al., 2020) recommend cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) as the first-line approach for chronic forms of insomnia. Among the available pharmacological options, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor agonists, such as benzodiazepines and Z-drugs including zolpidem, zaleplon zopiclone, and eszopiclone, have been used for decades in insomnia management (Riemann et al., 2017; Sateia et al., 2017; Wilson et al., 2019; Palagini et al., 2020), while the melatonin receptor agonists, ramelteon and prolonged-release melatonin 2 mg represent new important therapeutic options acting on circadian sleep regulation (Wilson et al., 2019; Palagini et al., 2020). Since the maladaptive neuroplasticity and allostatic overload hypothesized in chronic insomnia may be related to alterations in GABAergic neurotransmission, we can speculate that GABAA receptor modulators, such as hypnotic benzodiazepines and Z-drugs, may be able to remodulate the changes in sleep architecture/neuronal structure and function induced by chronic insomnia.
Although meta-analyses have confirmed the clinical efficacy of short- and intermediate-acting benzodiazepines and Z-drugs for the short-term treatment (≤4 weeks) of insomnia (Pillai et al., 2017; Lynch et al., 2020; Chiu et al., 2021), many concerns have reported during the last few years about the use of Z-drugs, originally marketed as a safe alternative to benzodiazepines (Schifano et al., 2019). Accordingly, the aim of this review was to focus at a physiological level on the effect of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs on sleep regulation, brain plasticity, and the stress system, which are altered in chronic insomnia. To this end, we discussed the physiological aspects of GABA and GABAA receptor activity on sleep, brain plasticity, and brain systems modulating stress, with potential implications for chronic insomnia pathophysiology. We then reviewed the available data on the effect of hypnotic benzodiazepines, on sleep, neuroplasticity and brain systems modulating stress with implications for insomnia treatment. We also discuss the available data on commonly prescribed benzodiazepines for chronic insomnia, which include the short- and intermediate-acting hypnotics (such as brotizolam, lormetazepam, temazepam, triazolam) and the Z-drugs (zolpidem, zopiclone, eszopiclone, zaleplon). Although flurazepam, oxazepam, lorazepam, and diazepam are widely used as hypnotics, they are also indicated for anxiety disorders and are not included in this review.
Method
Literature searches were done according to PRISMA guidelines (Moher et al., 2009) using several combinations of search terms, including: “hypnotic benzodiazepines,” or “brotizolam,” or “lormetazepam,” or “temazepam,” or “triazolam,” or “zolpidem,” or “zopiclone,” or “zaleplon,” or “eszopiclone” and “insomnia” and “effects on sleep” and “effect on brain plasticity” and “effect on stress system.”
Inclusion criteria were experimental and clinical studies or review articles on animals and humans that assessed the effect of hypnotic benzodiazepines or Z-drugs on sleep pattern and regulation, sleep-related synaptic plasticity, and on brain circuits modulating stress. Review articles and studies that evaluated other sleep or other psychiatric disorders were excluded. However, given the complexity and heterogeneity of existing research, with most of the studies performed in the early 1980s showing varying methodological quality, we were unable to perform a systematic literature review and instead presented our findings as a narrative review.
As hypnotic benzodiazepines and Z-drugs act selectively on GABAA receptors, we initially discussed the role of GABA and GABAA receptors in sleep and brain systems modulating stress, with implications for chronic insomnia pathophysiology, while the second part of our review discussed the implications for insomnia treatment.
Results
GABAergic transmission, sleep, and brain systems modulating stress
GABA, a four-carbon non-proteinogenic amino acid, is the most important inhibitory neurotransmitter present in high concentrations in different areas of the mammalian brain. Thus, approximately 20–50% of all synapses are under GABAergic inhibitory control (Montaldo et al., 1984). GABA exerts its primary function at the synaptic level, where, by binding to pre/post-synaptic GABAA receptors, it activates chloride ion channels and hyperpolarizes the cell membranes, thus modulating the threshold of neuronal excitability (Biggio et al., 1977; Study and Barker, 1981; Biggio, 1983; Zhu et al., 2018). GABAA receptors are characterized by multiple allosteric binding sites, including those for benzodiazepines (Braestrup and Squires, 1977).
Ligands that interact with these binding sites induce a conformational change in GABAA receptors, and thereby modulate GABAA-receptor functioning. Given the ubiquitous role of GABA as an inhibitory neurotransmitter and its widespread distribution in the brain, GABAA receptors play a major role in regulating multiple neuronal systems, including those modulating stress response, sleep pattern, and circadian rhythms (Diana et al., 2014; Rashmi et al., 2018). Indeed, GABAergic neurons and other neurotransmitters play a major role in regulating the sleep-wake system at cortico-medullary pathways. GABAergic neurons may modulate both rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM (NREM), particularly slow wave sleep (SWS) (Luppi et al., 2017), and, at the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), modulate circadian rhythm (DeWoskin et al., 2015).
Moreover, activation of GABAA receptors is implicated in the regulation of sleep, and GABAergic activity from the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus (VLPO) of the hypothalamus exerts an inhibitory control over the ascending arousal network. The latter is sustained by many wake promoting circuits including cholinergic basal forebrain, histaminergic tuberomammillary nucleus, serotonergic dorsal raphe, and noradrenaline producing locus coeruleus, with orexin neurons sending excitatory projection to the thalamus and neocortex (Mavanji et al., 2015). Moreover, GABAergic neurons make inhibitory connections with both orexin and ascending arousal systems (Ferrari et al., 2018).
Since GABA is involved in the synaptic plasticity changes of the retinohypothalamic tract-SCN synapses, it has been hypothesized that GABA may regulate the circadian rhythm by modulating both input and output of circadian oscillation in the SCN. This is important since sleep is essential for brain homeostasis and for synaptic renormalization according to the synaptic homeostasis hypothesis, which proposes that sleep has a functional role in synaptic plasticity through the sleep/wake cycle (Tononi and Cirelli, 2003, 2020; de Vivo et al., 2017). This process functions restore the total synaptic strength to a sustainable energy level, favoring sleep-dependent memory consolidation after experience-dependent synaptic potentiation during wakefulness. Specifically, slow waves (0.5–4 Hz), which may reflect the homeostatic regulation of sleep, are closely associated with mechanisms of neural plasticity (Abel et al., 2013), which is thought to be the cellular substrate underlying the processes of memory formation and consolidation. Moreover, sleep has been found to enhance neural plasticity, and REM sleep and NREM sleep spindles may promote different forms of memory consolidation, while slow-wave activity may promote Hebbian and non-Hebbian synaptic plasticity (Tononi and Cirelli, 2006).
Brain circuits in the amygdala are regulated by GABAergic neurons and other neurotransmitters to modulate stress and anxiety responses under both normal and pathological conditions (Biggio et al., 1990, 1992; Nuss, 2015). Thus, GABAergic neurons, through their inhibitory control over the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis activity, play an important role in stress response. GABA inputs rendered ineffective to synaptic inhibition of the HPA axis via disruption of this regulatory response thereby contributing to the abnormal effects of chronic stress exposure. Recent data support the hypothesis that stress causes major changes in the GABAergic system, affecting neuroplasticity especially in the prefrontal cortex (Gilabert-Juan et al., 2013), in turn compromising emotional processing and vulnerability to stress-related disorders (Fogaça and Duman, 2019).
Implications for insomnia disorder pathophysiology
Low levels of GABA or impaired GABAergic transmission are associated with the etiology and maintenance of acute and chronic stress (Jie et al., 2018) and acute and chronic insomnia (Gottesmann, 2002; Plante et al., 2012).
Current evidence for the pathophysiology of insomnia converges on the hypothesis that it is a stress-related disorder according to the diathesis-stress model, with hyperarousal as a key factor (Riemann et al., 2010, 2015). In fact, evidence for increased central nervous system (CNS) brain metabolism, sympathetic activity, high-frequency EEG activation and REM density, activation of arousal promoting neurotransmission consistent with the central and peripheral hyperactivation of stress and inflammatory systems, have been shown in insomnia (Riemann et al., 2010, 2015). Insomnia is therefore considered a stressor which impairs neuroplasticity leading to a state of allostatic overload, favoring medical and psychiatric disorders (McEwen, 2003; Meerlo et al., 2009; Lo Martire et al., 2020; Palagini et al., 2021). In this framework, the hyperactivity of the HPA axis has consistently been demonstrated to be related to a functional reduction of the cortical GABAergic system and with deficient GABAergic synapses (Biggio et al., 1981; Biggio, 1983; Corda and Biggio, 1986) associated with CNS hyperarousal in insomnia (Winkelman et al., 2008; Plante et al., 2012). Increased GABA levels in subjects suffering from insomnia have been found and may reflect a potential compensatory allostatic response to chronic hyperarousal (Morgan et al., 2012).
Maladaptive changes in neuroplasticity are hypothesized in insomnia, reflecting GABAergic alterations (Salas et al., 2014). Healthy sleep facilitates neural plasticity thought to consolidate newly acquired and initially unstable memories, whereas studies in insomnia patients have shown that these processes may be impaired. In particular, insomnia is associated with a reduction in SWS (Backhaus et al., 2006; Baglioni et al., 2016; Krone et al., 2017) and diminished sleep-related consolidation of declarative and procedural memories. As impaired neuroplasticity favors the accumulation of neurotoxic proteins, neuroinflammation, and stress system alterations, insomnia is considered to be a causal factor in neurodegenerative (Shamim et al., 2019) and neuropsychiatric disorders (Palagini et al., 2019, 2020).
Role of GABAA receptor agonists in sleep, neuroplasticity, and brain systems modulating stress: Implications for insomnia treatment
The GABAA receptor, a pentameric ligand-gated ion channel composed of 5 transmembrane glycoprotein subunits (two α, two β, and one γ), each characterized by different isoforms [α1–6, β1–3, and γ1–3], binds GABA at the extracellular level. Hypnotic benzodiazepines and Z-drugs bind at the interface of the α and γ subunits of the GABAA receptor, acting as positive allosteric modulators and allowing a conformational modification of the subunit structure. This mechanism causes enhanced affinity of the binding site for GABA, thus increasing the frequency of the chloride ion channel opening and the consequent increase in the efficacy of inhibition on the CNS and brain excitability.
Benzodiazepines, developed in the 1950s, remain one of the most widely used therapeutic agents for the treatment of insomnia and anxiety (Nemeroff, 2003; Riemann et al., 2015), together with the so called Z-drugs that activate GABAA synaptic transmission hence inhibiting the arousal promoting neurotransmission (Riemann et al., 2015). Studies have revealed that while the sedative effect is mediated by α1-containing GABAA receptors, the anxiolytic-like and anti-stress-related actions are mediated by α2- and α3-containing GABAA receptors, and the α5 subunit is mainly involved in the amnesic effect (Soh and Lynch, 2015; Sigel and Ernst, 2018). The hypnotic effect seems to be induced by the concomitant activation of α1, α2, α3, and α5 GABAA receptor subtypes (Rudolph et al., 1999; Crestani et al., 2001; Sanna et al., 2002; Dias et al., 2005; Engin et al., 2018; Sigel and Ernst, 2018).
Most of the hypnotic benzodiazepines show a similar high affinity for the α1, α2, α3, and α5 receptor subtypes. In contrast, Z-drugs have a lower affinity for these subunits (Rudolph et al., 1999; Crestani et al., 2001; Sanna et al., 2002; Dias et al., 2005; Engin et al., 2018; Sigel and Ernst, 2018). For example, zolpidem does not bind the α5 subunit and its affinity for the α1 and for the α2, α3 GABAA receptor subtypes, respectively, is approximately 10x and 100x lower that of triazolam (Sanna et al., 2002). Thus, benzodiazepines and Z-drugs induce a hypnotic effect by binding, albeit with different affinity, to GABAA receptor α subunits including those mediating the anxiolytic effects and reducing neuroendocrine response to stress effects (Carrasco and Van de Kar, 2003; Kovacic and Somanathan, 2009; Rudolph and Knoflach, 2011; Engin et al., 2018).
Some hypnotics may produce more “physiological” sleep based on polysomnography, while other compounds may alter sleep architecture and may affect homeostatic sleep processes, sleep functions, and synaptic plasticity (Seibt et al., 2008). Similarly, other studies have raised the possibility that the short-acting benzodiazepines, commonly prescribed for insomnia, may facilitate circadian rhythm adaptation and sleep wake homeostasis, via a GABAergic mechanism, while others hypnotics do not (Buxton et al., 2000). Hence, differences can be found among GABAergic hypnotics in relation to sleep pattern and sleep regulation. It is possible that some compounds may facilitate more physiological sleep and sustain sleep-related neuroplasticity by regulating circadian and homeostatic sleep processes, while others may affect those processes.
Although it has been hypothesized that sleep facilitates synaptic plasticity related to memory consolidation, it is not clear how these processes are influenced by drugs commonly prescribed for insomnia. Different classes of hypnotics may impart different effects on plastic events normally occurring during sleep. It is known that hypnotics with high affinity for the α5 subunit, that produce anterograde amnesia and impair daytime cognitive functioning, could also impair synaptic plasticity (Seibt et al., 2008). Indeed, differences have been identified at a molecular level among hypnotics. In fact, triazolam may sustain neuroplasticity during sleep while Z-drugs, in particular zolpidem, show a potential impairment of neuroplasticity (Seibt et al., 2008; Hall-Porter et al., 2014) and of sleep-dependent memory processing (Fitzgerald et al., 2014).
Hence, hypnotics may show different effects on neural plasticity. In this framework, evidence to date does not support a causal relationship between hypnotic benzodiazepines and the development of neurodegenerative diseases while disrupted sleep may be a causal factor (DeKosky and Williamson, 2020; Salzman, 2020; Gallet et al., 2021).
It has been hypothesized that benzodiazepine may reduce the effect of stress on the CNS and reduce the risk of vulnerability to neurodegenerative diseases (DeKosky and Williamson, 2020). Accordingly, benzodiazepines by enhancing GABAergic neurotransmission markedly reduce the extensive activation of glutamate and cortisol secretion, exerting a neuroprotective effect on brain circuits from the negative action elicited by acute and chronic stressful conditions (Ferrarese et al., 1993; Carrasco and Van de Kar, 2003; Fries et al., 2006; Engin et al., 2018). Benzodiazepines may also interact with peripheral and central immune systems by suppressing cytokine secretion and microglia activation elicited by stress (Bhat et al., 2010; Ramirez et al., 2016; Bollinger et al., 2020).
Conversely, the anxiolytic-like effects of Z-drugs may differ among compounds used in experimental studies (Fitzgerald et al., 2014).
GABAA receptors agonists: Implications for insomnia treatment
Commonly prescribed hypnotic benzodiazepines (brotizolam, lormetazepam, temazepam, triazolam) and Z-drugs (zolpidem, zopiclone, eszopiclone, zaleplon) are discussed in the following sections, with a focus on their effects on sleep pattern and sleep regulation, sleep-related synaptic plasticity, and stress-related brain systems.
Hypnotic benzodiazepines
Brotizolam
Brotizolam (8-bromo-6-(o-chlorophenyl)-1-methyl-4H triazolo[3,4-c]thieno[2,3-e]-1,4-diazepine), is one of the thieno-triazolo diazepine derivatives with α1-containing GABAA receptors involvement in mediating the effects on sleep. It binds with high affinity to benzodiazepine receptor sites, is indicated as an hypnotic in the management of insomnia, with anticonvulsant, antianxiety, and muscle relaxant properties demonstrated in animal studies (Langley and Clissold, 1988). Brotizolam has an ‘intermediate’ elimination half-life of approximately 5 h (Langley and Clissold, 1988).
In clinical trials, brotizolam 0.125–0.5 mg hastened the onset of sleep and reduced the number and duration of nocturnal awakenings in clinical trials, increasing total sleep time and reducing total wake time (reviewed in Langley and Clissold, 1988). Minimal morning drowsiness and no residual impairment of psychomotor performance, respectively, were identified for dosages < 0.5 mg taken at night and for dosages within the recommended range of 0.125–0.25 mg. Indeed, side effects may include drowsiness, headache, and dizziness. Rebound insomnia has been reported following the sudden withdrawal of brotizolam (Langley and Clissold, 1988).
Effect on sleep pattern and sleep regulation
Brotizolam 0.5 mg taken at night may increase NREM stage 2 sleep and beta-activity, decrease alpha-activity, and reduce REM sleep in patients with insomnia, but was not effective at 0.25 mg, and it remains to be determined if SWS is altered (Saletu et al., 1983; Langley and Clissold, 1988). In an animal model, brotizolam facilitated re-entrainment of circadian rhythms (Yokota et al., 2000).Specifically, brotizolam 0.25 and 0.5 mg significantly reduced sleep onset latency, reduced nocturnal awakenings, and improved sleep quality compared with placebo in insomnia (Saletu et al., 1983; Langley and Clissold, 1988).
NREM Stage 2 sleep was also increased, particularly in patients with insomnia. REM sleep was not significantly altered in healthy volunteers who received doses of 0.25 mg at night. No alterations in the duration and frequency of REM sleep have been reported (Suzuki et al., 2003).
The activity of brotizolam (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mg) was studied in healthy subjects using quantitative pharmaco-EEG, psychometric and clinical evaluation. Power spectral density analysis showed that brotizolam (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mg), but not placebo, increased beta-activity, decreased alpha-activity, and augmented SWS activity in healthy subjects (Saletu et al., 1983). Decreased attention, concentration, psychomotor performance, and affectivity, and increased reaction time were also identified with brotizolam 0.5 mg (Saletu et al., 1983).
Brotizolam may also facilitate the re-entrainment of circadian rhythms (Yokota et al., 2000). In particular, large phase advances in hamster rhythm were induced with brotizolam injected during mid-subjective daytime (circadian time 6 or 9), but not at circadian time 0, 3, or 15. Moreover, significantly reduced expression of Per1 and Per2 was identified in the SCN at 1 and 2 h after injection of brotizolam. These results suggested that brotizolam may facilitate the re-entrainment of circadian rhythms (Yokota et al., 2000).
Effect on sleep-related synaptic plasticity
Although no studies have specifically investigated brain plasticity, the effect of brotizolam on the CNS in relation to sleep, arousal, and memory processes has been explored.
In studies conducted in animal model, brotizolam may contribute to reducing hyperarousal. In rats, intraperitoneal administration of 0.1–10 mg/kg brotizolam significantly retarded the rate of alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine-induced depletion of dopamine in the olfactory tubercle and retardation in nucleus accumbens and caudate nucleus. These data suggested that brotizolam inhibited dopamine turnover in the limbic forebrain and/or neostriatal dopaminergic neurons, likely through the facilitation of GABAergic action on dopaminergic nerve terminals (Ishiko et al., 1983).
Intraperitoneal or oral administration of brotizolam in rabbits also showed that brotizolam favored SWS, with high amplitudes in the neocortex. It also inhibited arousal responses by stimulating to the midbrain reticular formation and posterior hypothalamus (Kimishima et al., 1984).
Other studies conducted in animal model showed that brotizolam may affect sleep-dependent memory processes and produced anterograde and retrograde amnesia (Anand et al., 2007).
In studies conducted on sleep-dependent memory consolidation in humans, brotizolam did not appear to affect memory storage during sleep (Silva et al., 2003). In this study conducted in a small number of subjects (eight subjects), authors compared brotizolam 0.25 mg and zopiclone 7.5 mg taken at bedtime. Brotizolam did not affected morning recall of a standard word list learned before the bedtime dose, with a similar number of words recalled the following morning as placebo-treated subjects. Digit Symbol Substitution Test revealed no residual sedation by brotizolam or zopiclone. Brotizolam did not affect the morning recall compared to placebo, but subjects remembered less words under zopiclone treatment, suggesting that this drug could affect memory storage during sleep.
In summary, brotizolam does not appear to negatively affect the homeostatic process of sleep regulation, with no evidence suggesting impairment of SWS, which is believed to reflect mechanisms of neural plasticity (Abel et al., 2013). While it is possible that brotizolam does not affect processes of sleep-dependent brain plasticity, its exact role on brain plasticity remains to be determined.
Effect on stress-related brain systems
Although only a few studies have evaluated the effect of brotizolam on the stress system, evidence suggests that it may reduce cortisol under conditions of fear.
Specifically, brotizolam reduced fear in calves following exposure to a novel object test (Van Reenen et al., 2009). Holstein Friesian heifer calves received an intravenous injection of either a vehicle control or one of four doses of brotizolam. They were then subjected to a ‘combined’ test involving exposure to a novel environment for 5 min followed by the sudden introduction of a novel object for a further 10 min. Compared to vehicle treatment, the highest dose of brotizolam dose-dependently and significantly increased the time spent in locomotion. Findings supported the notion that and brotizolam may reduce related cortisol concentration in calves under fear conditions (Van Reenen et al., 2009).
Lormetazepam
Lormetazepam (3-hydroxy-benzo-1,4 diazepine) is a hypnotic, with potent agonistic action on central GABAA receptors. It has a terminal half-life of 8–12 h and no active metabolites (Bixler et al., 1985). Lormetazepam 0.5–2.0 mg improved sleep onset latency, total sleep duration, number of awakenings in healthy subjects. Among side effects, hangover-like symptoms have been reported the morning following nocturnal doses of 2 mg and 1.5 mg, potentially disrupting information retrieval from short-term memory. CNS side effects, such as excitement and violence, have also been described (Faccini et al., 2019). A very high dependence potential of lormetazepam with drop formulation has recently increased concerns regarding its use (Costa et al., 2021).
Effect on sleep pattern and regulation
Lormetazepam reduces REM sleep and increases sleep spindles and K-complexes in both healthy subjects and patients with insomnia (Kubicki et al., 1987; Jobert et al., 1992; Nicholson and Pascoe, 1992). No studies were identified that assessed the effect of lormetazepam on circadian rhythms, or SWS.
Effect on sleep-related synaptic plasticity and on stress-related brain systems
No studies investigating the use of lormetazepam have been conducted on these topics.
Temazepam
Temazepam, a 1,4-benzodiazepine, is a hydroxylated metabolite of diazepam (3-hydroxydiazepam), with GABAA receptor involvement in mediating its effects on sleep. Its half-life of about 5–11 h is relatively short, although this is longer in some subjects and in the elderly, and it has no active metabolites of clinical importance (Heel et al., 1981; Kales, 1990; Fraschini and Stankov, 1993; Morin et al., 2003). The usual dosage range of temazepam is 7.5 to 30 mg taken at or shortly before bedtime. Residual effects on morning performance with impaired psychomotor and cognitive function in the morning have been reported for the 30 mg dosage. Moreover, rebound insomnia may occur on withdrawal of temazepam treatment. The most frequently reported adverse events include gastrointestinal complaints, headache, dreams or nightmares, and residual sedation (Heel et al., 1981; Fraschini and Stankov, 1993; Morin et al., 2003).
Effect on sleep pattern and regulation
Temazepam may alter sleep pattern, largely decreasing SWS and REM sleep and increasing NREM stage 2 sleep, and therefore may interfere with the homeostatic regulation of sleep, but without affecting the circadian regulation of sleep.
A linear dose-response improvement in total sleep time and sleep latency was demonstrated for temazepam compared with placebo in sleep laboratory studies. Specifically, temazepam significantly increased sleep spindle duration, amplitude and density in frontal and central-posterior regions, with suppression of NREM SWS and REM sleep (Roehrs et al., 1986; Hemmeter et al., 2000; Karlsson et al., 2000; Erman et al., 2005; Arbon et al., 2015; Plante et al., 2015). There was no evidence to suggest a phase shifting effect of temazepam (Norman et al., 2001), or that temazepam altered the rates of entrainment of physiological rhythms (Donaldson and Kennaway, 1991).
Effect on sleep-related synaptic plasticity
No studies have been specifically conducted on brain plasticity related to temazepam. Indeed, Plante et al. (2015) conducted a high-density electroencephalography EEG study to evaluate the effects of temazepam on slow wave activity in 18 healthy adults compared to placebo. Temazepam was associated with significant decreases in slow-wave activity and incidence in healthy adults treated with temazepam 15 mg but not with placebo. Temazepam also reduced the magnitude of high-amplitude slow waves and their slopes in the first non-REM sleep episode, which was most prominent in frontal derivations.
Since SWS may reflect the homeostatic regulation of sleep and is closely associated with memory consolidation and, in general, with mechanisms of neural plasticity (Abel et al., 2013), it is possible that temazepam may impair processes of sleep-dependent synaptic plasticity.
Effect on stress-related brain systems
Only a few, albeit highly heterogeneous, studies have evaluated the effect of temazepam on the stress system. Nonetheless, evidence suggests that temazepam may reduce the HPA axis activity.
In a double-blind, random assignment, placebo-controlled study of six young women in the first half of their menstrual cycle, temazepam 20 mg significantly lowered plasma cortisol 40 min after ingestion, with lowered levels persisting after 3 h, and significantly raised plasma prolactin levels at 1 h after ingestion compared with placebo (Beary et al., 1983). The impact on cortisol was significant at 40 min and persisted for 3 h after oral ingestion. Prolactin was significantly raised at 1 h after ingestion (Beary et al., 1983).
In adult male Wistar rats, temazepam increased the release of vasopressin within the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus in a dose-dependent manner (Welt et al., 2006). Temazepam blunted the stressor exposure-induced secretion of corticotropin (ACTH) in a dose-dependent manner and enhanced the intra-PVN release of vasopressin (AVP).
The authors suggested that temazepam may reduce HPA axis activity both directly, via GABAA receptors, and indirectly, by increasing the intrahypothalamic concentrations of vasopressin.
Triazolam
Triazolam is a triazolobenzodiazepine with GABAA receptor involvement in mediating its effects on sleep. Triazolam showed high efficacy as a positive modulator of GABA-elicited chloride currents with similar affinities for α1 (1.7), α2 (1.2), α3 (1.3), and α5 (1.4) receptors (Lelas et al., 2002; Sanna et al., 2002; Maubach et al., 2004; Licata et al., 2009). Its half-life in healthy subjects is relatively short (approximately 2–3 h), with hypnotic dosages from 0.125 to 0.25 mg taken at bedtime.
Triazolam is generally well tolerated, with no impairment of psychomotor or cognitive functioning the day after ingestion (Uemura et al., 2015), although residual drowsiness (‘hangover’) is dose-dependent and may occur the next morning at dosages of 1 mg or greater with the incidence usually being no greater than with a placebo after a 0.25 mg dose (5.7% for both), slightly higher after 0.5 mg (8.1%), but about four times greater after 1 mg (Takahashi et al., 2003). Side effects, including headache, dizziness, nervousness, and dry mouth, are usually mild and are reported in less than 4% of patients receiving triazolam 0.125–0.25 mg, and these have usually been mild. Insufficient data were available for meta-analysis of adverse events associated to a greater dose (0.25 mg) of triazolam (Sateia et al., 2017).
Effect on sleep pattern and sleep regulation
Triazolam at the therapeutic dosage may reduce stage 1 sleep and increase stage 2 sleep, with minimal effects on SWS and REM sleep at the lower dosage. Triazolam has also been shown to depress the generation of SWS without disrupting the homeostatic and ultradian processes of sleep regulation. Triazolam may also facilitate the re-entrainment of mammalian circadian rhythms, improve parameters of sleep–wake homeostasis, and sleep architecture in addition to alleviating insomnia properties. Findings in human studies support the conclusion that triazolam has chronobiotic properties (Kanno et al., 1993; Buxton et al., 2000).
In human sleep laboratory studies in healthy volunteers, triazolam 0.125 mg caused dose-dependent effects on sleep stages in both healthy volunteers and insomnia patients, significantly decreased stage 1 sleep and increased stage 2 sleep compared with baseline, with no or only minimal effects on SWS (Kanno et al., 2000). Studies showed that Triazolam may act on sleep architecture without disrupting the homeostatic and ultradian processes of sleep regulation (Borbély and Achermann, 1991). In a recent study conducted in animals, intravenous administration of triazolam (0.1 mg/kg, i.v.), zopiclone (2 mg/kg, i.v.), and zaleplon (1 mg/kg, i.v.) showed a remarkable increase in the delta wave activity (Noguchi et al., 2002), supporting early observations.
A moderate reduction in REM sleep during the first half of the night occurred after triazolam 0.25 or 0.5 mg, however, REM sleep during the first two sleep cycles was significantly reduced with triazolam 1 mg, with a compensatory increase in REM observed in the 4–6th sleep cycles (Pegram et al., 1980; Kubicki et al., 1987). In elderly patients with insomnia (60–85 years), triazolam 0.125 mg had no effect on sleep stages; % stage 1 was 22% and % stage 3–4 was 5% on both placebo and active drug.
Evidence of tolerance or rebound insomnia on abrupt withdrawal were not identified in most sleep laboratory studies, but evidence of reduced effectiveness on repeated administration was reported in one such study (Pakes et al., 1981).
Findings in animal and human studies demonstrated that triazolam can induce major shifts in the circadian clock facilitating resynchronization. Extensive studies in rodents demonstrated that triazolam phase-shifts the circadian clock (Seidel et al., 1986; Turek and Losee-Olson, 1986) and can reduce the number of days necessary for circadian rhythms to become re-entrained following 8-h shifts in the light-dark cycle (van Reeth and Turek, 1987). This phase shifting or “chronobiotic” effect of triazolam highlight the possibility that triazolam could facilitate the re-entrainment of human 24-h rhythms in addition to alleviating insomnia properties (Buxton et al., 2000; Kanno et al., 2000). For example, appropriately timed administration of triazolam facilitated adaptation of circadian rhythmicity in a human model of jet lag (Buxton et al., 2000). In this study, 6 healthy males (24–31 years old) received triazolam or placebo in two double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of an 8-h delay shift of sleep–wake and dark-light cycles simulating westward travel. Sleep recordings and 24-h cortisol and growth hormone profiles were obtained at baseline and on the first, third, and fifth days’ post-shift. With placebo, the shift induced disturbances of sleep and hormonal secretion, and a gradual re-entrainment of circadian rhythmicity was observed. On the other hand, triazolam accelerated re-entrainment of circadian rhythms (chronobiotic effect) and normalized markers of sleep/wake homeostasis significantly facilitating adaptation compared with placebo.
In summary, triazolam at the therapeutic dosage may reduce stage 1 sleep, increasing stage 2 with having minimal effects on SWS and REM sleep. If triazolam may depress the generation of NREM SWS it may do it without disrupting the homeostatic and ultradian processes of sleep regulation (Borbély and Achermann, 1991). Several studies in animals and humans showed that triazolam may facilitate the re-entrainment of human 24-h rhythms.
Effect on sleep-related synaptic plasticity
Available data on brain synaptic plasticity shows that triazolam may not negatively affect brain plasticity or sleep-facilitated memory consolidation in humans, with no effect on c-Fos, c-Fos gene expression is a marker of neural activity, and only a transient decrease in brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) protein levels.
Triazolam had no effect on sleep-dependent brain plasticity in a canonical animal model of in vivo cortical plasticity (Seibt et al., 2008). The effects of triazolam, zolpidem, and ramelteon were studied on cats in the critical period of visual development. Polysomnographic recordings were performed during the entire experiment. After a baseline sleep/wake recording cats received 6 h of monocular deprivation followed by an injection of triazolam, zolpidem, ramelteon, or vehicle. They were then allowed to sleep for 8 h, after which they were prepared for optical imaging of intrinsic cortical signals and single-unit electrophysiology. Zolpidem reduced cortical plasticity by ∼50% as assessed with optical imaging of intrinsic cortical signals, while triazolam and ramelteon showed not to reduce sleep dependent brain plasticity (Seibt et al., 2008).
Since both triazolam and zolpidem bind to the α1-subunit in vitro (Hadingham et al., 1993) authors expected similar effects on sleep-dependent cortical plasticity. One potential explanation offered by the authors was that only zolpidem activates the α1-GABAA-receptors enough to impair plasticity (Seibt et al., 2008). Authors discussed that BDZs, like triazolam are non-selective for any subunit composition and bind with similar affinity to different GABAA-receptors subtypes explaining most of the anxiolytic effects and EEG changes (Sanna et al., 2002; Rudolph and Knoflach, 2011). In contrast, zolpidem binds to α1-containing GABAA-receptor with an affinity almost 10 times higher than for α2,3– containing GABAA-receptors (Sanna et al., 2002; Seibt et al., 2008). Therefore, while other potential mechanisms cannot be excluded, these data can be best explained by the effect of zolpidem on GABAA-receptor subunits (Seibt et al., 2008).
Studies conducted in both humans and animals have also shown that triazolam 0.25 mg may not interfere with sleep-related memory processes. Twenty-two healthy volunteers participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. All subjects received a single oral dose of zolpidem (10 mg), triazolam (0.25 mg) or placebo at 9 PM and slept for 7.5 ± 0.2 h. The effect of sleep on memory was investigated by comparing the performance of this group of volunteers with a group of 21 subjects in wakefulness condition (Meléndez et al., 2005).
Declarative memory was evaluated by using a free-recall test of ten standard word and seven no word lists. Subjects memorized lists 1 h before dosing and they were asked to recall the memorized lists 10 h after dosing. DSST was used. Neither zolpidem nor triazolam affected the enhanced non-word recall observed after sleep. None of the hypnotics affected the improvement in the DSST performance of subjects who slept (Meléndez et al., 2005).
In a study conducted in a small sample of subjects triazolam was used at higher doses than normal such as 0.375 mg and showed to adversely affect overnight motor learning (Morgan et al., 2010). This adverse effect may be due to its direct influence on motor performance, rather than interference with sleep-dependent memory consolidation. Additionally, the small sample (N = 12) may have provided insufficient power to detect an effect with the dose of zolpidem employed.
Another study aimed to reveal the molecular mechanisms that may contribute to the effects of benzodiazepines in the hippocampus involved in drug-related plasticity. Previous studies have demonstrated that both BDNF and c-Fos contribute to memory- and abuse-related processes that occur within the hippocampus and their expression is altered in response to BZ exposure. In a study, mice received acute or repeated administration of diazepam, zolpidem and triazolam. After acute administration of both triazolam and zolpidem there was a decreased in BDNF protein levels within the hippocampus, without any effect on c-Fos (Licata et al., 2013).
Effect on stress-related brain systems
Available data on the effect of triazolam on the stress system showed that triazolam may not have a negative effect on stress-induced stimulation of the HPA axis, whereas it may favor circadian regulation of 24-h cortisol and growth hormone profiles facilitating circadian adaptations in rhythmicity and sleep–wake homeostasis. By deactivating the basal forebrain and amygdaloid complexes, which are involved in the emotional regulation of anxiety and fear, of human subjects during non-REM sleep, triazolam may exert an anxiolytic effect which may be synergic to its hypnotic effect.
Although benzodiazepines are known to affect pituitary hormone release, pretreatment with triazolam or flurazepam did not significantly affect pituitary response to mild hypoglycemic stress in young healthy volunteers, with similar peaks observed in growth hormone, prolactin, and cortisol compared with placebo (Ambrosi et al., 1986). This suggests that acute benzodiazepine administration does not affect the neuroendocrine response to mild stress (Ambrosi et al., 1986). In a separate study, triazolam contributed to the circadian regulation of 24-h cortisol and growth hormone profiles, facilitating circadian adaptations in rhythmicity and sleep-wake homeostasis (Buxton et al., 2000).
A double-blind, crossover study with oxygen-15 water ([15O]H2O) Positron emission tomography (PET) has been used to study the functional neuroanatomy of human sleep, and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) during human sleep after administration of triazolam or placebo has been conducted. Fifteen healthy university students were studied. Using functional neuroanatomical PET, authors found that the basal forebrain and the amygdaloid complexes of human subjects showed deactivation during non-REM sleep after triazolam treatment. This is supported by the finding that the basal forebrain is deactivated during deep non-REM sleep in normal humans, suggesting that deactivation of the basal forebrain is involved in the non-REM sleep networks. The present finding showed that triazolam deactivated the basal forebrain and the amygdaloid complexes during non-REM sleep (Kajimura et al., 2004). This suggested that inhibition of the forebrain control system for wakefulness may cause the hypno inducing effect of benzodiazepines. Since the amygdaloid complexes are involved in emotional response, including anxiety and fear, the anxiolytic effect of the benzodiazepines may also be associated with their sleep-related effect (Kajimura et al., 2004).
Z-drugs
Z-drugs (zolpidem, zaleplon, zopiclone, eszopiclone) were introduced in the 1980s for the treatment of insomnia with the aim of overcoming some of the disadvantages of benzodiazepines, such as next-day sedation and daytime sleepiness, as well as dependence and withdrawal syndrome. Although initially seen as safer alternatives to benzodiazepines, concern related to the abuse and dependency of Z-drugs has arisen over the past three decades (Schifano et al., 2019).
Zolpidem
Zolpidem is an imidazopyridine with preferential affinity for the α1-GABAA receptor subtype (Biggio et al., 1989; Crestani et al., 2000). Zolpidem displayed a higher affinity (Ki = 20 nM) at α1-GABAA receptors (α1β2γ2, α1β3γ2) with much lower affinity (Ki = 400nM) at α2- and α3-GABAA receptors (α2β1γ2, α3β1γ2) and failed to interact with GABAA receptors containing the α5 subunit (α5β3γ2, α5β2γ2: Ki≥ 20.000 nM) (Crestani et al., 2000). In vivo studies showed that the sedative-hypnotic and anticonvulsant effect of zolpidem were mediated by its preferential interaction with α1-GABAA receptors but not with α2- or α3-GABAA receptors (Crestani et al., 2000; Sanna et al., 2002).
The bioavailability of zolpidem is 70% in humans, with peak plasma concentration reached within 1 h of administration and an elimination half-life of 1.5–2.5 h; active metabolites are not accumulated following its degradation (Fitzgerald et al., 2014).
Increasing concern has arisen recently since zolpidem has been associated with significant increases in parasomnias, amnesia, hallucinations, and suicidality compared with placebo (Coleman and Ota, 2004; Sun et al., 2016; Wong et al., 2017). A proposed mechanism involves a pharmacodynamic interaction between serotonin reuptake inhibition and the drug (Elko et al., 1998).
Accordingly, in January 2013, the FDA recommended lower doses of zolpidem due to the risk of impaired activities that require alertness, including driving, in the morning after ingestion in some patients. The FDA informed the manufacturers that the recommended dose of zolpidem for women and aged people should be lowered from 10 to 5 mg for immediate-release products and from 12.5 to 6.25 mg for extended-release products. The FDA also informed the manufacturers that, for men, the labeling should recommend that health care professionals consider prescribing the lower doses-5 mg for immediate-release products and 6.25 mg for extended-release products. In April 2019, the FDA added a Boxed Warning to the prescribing information for zolpidem highlighting the risk of rare, albeit serious, injuries (including deaths) due to adverse sleep behaviors, including sleepwalking, sleep driving, and other activities while not fully awake. Common zolpidem-induced delirium and sleep-related complex behavior include accidents, falls, overdoses as well as risks to others included assaults, vehicular accidents, various crimes, and civil actions that occurred during zolpidem-induced delirium and sleep related complex behaviors (Greenblatt and Zammit, 2012; Park et al., 2016; FDA, 2019a; Harbourt et al., 2020; Westermeyer and Carr, 2020). Recently and increased concern has been developed regarding its misuse and risk of abuse (Schifano et al., 2019).
Effect on sleep pattern and sleep regulation
The effects of zolpidem on sleep pattern may include an increase in NREM stage 2 sleep and spindle activity, a decrease in REM and NREM SWS, with homeostatic regulation of sleep also altered. Circadian regulation of sleep has not been explored to any great extent, and no effects have been described.
Time awake after the onset of sleep was reduced after one week and increased after 2 weeks, whereas sleep latency remained reduced. Zolpidem markedly increased the duration of Stage 2 sleep without affecting either NREM SWS or REM sleep in some early studies (Monti et al., 1996). Others studies pointed out that the effects of zolpidem on sleep pattern were in the same direction of hypnotic benzodiazepines, but of smaller magnitude. Period amplitude analysis showed that the decreased SWS activity resulted mainly from a decrease in wave amplitude. SWS suppression increased with repeated drug administration, alongside increases in sigma and beta activity, spindle activity and stage 2 sleep, and decreased and/or delayed REM sleep (Feinberg et al., 2000; Kanno et al., 2000; Mednick et al., 2013).
Studies on the effect of zolpidem on circadian rhythms are limited. In one study, bedtime administration of zolpidem was evaluated in relation to circadian rhythmicity of sleep and hormones. Zolpidem (10 mg) was given to eight healthy women (aged 21–33 years) at 10.45 PM and induced a transient moderate hyperprolactinemia, but failed to alter other sleep-related hormonal secretions or endocrine markers of circadian rhythmicity (Copinschi et al., 1995).
Effect on sleep-related synaptic plasticity
Zolpidem may affect brain plasticity and sleep-dependent memory consolidation during sleep.
In a canonical animal model of in vivo cortical plasticity the effects of three different classes, benzodiazepines, imidazopyridines and melatonin receptors agonists, of hypnotics were studied on cats (male and female) in the critical period of visual development (postnatal days 28–41). Zolpidem reduced cortical plasticity by approximately 50%, which was assessed with optical imaging of intrinsic cortical signals, ramelteon minimally impaired brain plasticity, while triazolam did not affect sleep-dependent brain plasticity. Authors concluded that the effect could be explained by the binding affinity of zolpidem to the α1 subunit, although other mechanisms cannot be excluded (Seibt et al., 2008).
In humans the effect of zolpidem on sleep-dependent memory consolidation was explored. Authors compared bedtime administration of zolpidem-ER 12.5 mg and middle-of-the-night administration of zaleplon 10 mg, and placebo to 22 healthy volunteers to examine the effect of different durations of hypnotic drug exposure on memory consolidation during sleep (Hall-Porter et al., 2014).
Bedtime dosing of zolpidem-ER reduced memory testing was conducted before and after an 8-h sleep period, using a word pair association task (WPT; declarative memory) and a finger-tapping task (FTT; procedural memory). ANOVA revealed a significant negative effect for the WPT (p = 0.025) and a trend for the FTT (p = 0.067). Improvement in memory performance followed sleep compared with placebo and zaleplon, whereas placebo and zaleplon were similar. Therefore, authors concluded that hypnotic exposure with zolpidem during most of the night might negatively affect sleep-dependent memory consolidation. Results suggested that zolpidem-ER compared to zaleplon may have the potential to reduce the degree of sleep-dependent memory consolidation (Hall-Porter et al., 2014).
Effect on stress-related brain systems
Studies examining the effect of zolpidem on stress system are heterogeneous and no overall conclusions can be made regarding its effect. Indeed, results suggests that zolpidem may activate the HPA, or have no effect on stress-induced anxiety-like behavior, or have limited effects on pre-sleep cortisol.
In a study basal hormonal output and induction of C Fos in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus were measured after administration of various benzodiazepine ligands in mice. Zolpidem produced a very strong increase in plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone and corticosterone, whereas diazepam and zopiclone induced a lower increase in circulating corticosterone. Diazepam and zopiclone had no effect on corticosterone while zolpidem also appeared to activate the HPA axis by inhibiting GABAergic tonic inhibitory control on CRH neurons (Mikkelsen et al., 2005). Therefore, Zolpidem effectively stimulates the HPA axis by disinhibiting the GABAergic input onto CRH. The authors concluded that the response of benzodiazepine receptor ligands on the HPA axis is determined through the balance between pharmacological activation of α1- and α2-containing GABAA receptors (Mikkelsen et al., 2005).
In a study the effects of three different doses (1, 3, and 10 mg/kg) of eszopiclone and zolpidem on the states of sleep and wakefulness, levels of anxiety-like behavior, and long-term contextual memory in foot shock-induced anxious rats, the administration of zolpidem at 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg doses did not attenuate stressor-induced anxiety-like behavior (Huang et al., 2010). The administration of eszopiclone at 1 mg/kg or zolpidem at 1 and 3 mg/kg doses attenuated the stressor-induced suppression of REM sleep. However, the REM sleep attenuating effects of these drugs disappeared when they were administered at higher doses. The administration of eszopiclone at 3 and 10 mg/kg doses and zolpidem at all three doses reduced the power of theta band frequencies during wakefulness. In addition, the administration of eszopiclone at 1 and 3 mg/kg doses suppressed stressor-induced anxiety-like behavior. The results of this study suggested that eszopiclone but not zolpidem may attenuated stress induced anxiety like behavior in animals (Huang et al., 2010).
To determine whether cortisol levels, both diurnal and pre-sleep, would be affected by zolpidem or placebo a study was conducted in patients with insomnia: zolpidem was found to reduce pre-sleep salivary cortisol relative to placebo but not diurnal urinary cortisol in subjects with insomnia (Roehrs and Roth, 2019). DSM-IV-TR diagnosed subjects with insomnia (N = 95), aged 32–70 years, having no other sleep disorder, unstable medical or psychiatric diseases or drug dependency served were studied. In this double-blind study, participants received zolpidem 10 mg or placebo for 12 months, and cortisol levels were assayed in urine and saliva samples. Higher levels of pre-sleep salivary cortisol were identified in patients with insomnia than controls, and pre-sleep cortisol was reduced with zolpidem at month 1 and 8, relative to placebo. Diurnal (0700–1500 h) urinary cortisol was not reduced with zolpidem, and was higher overall in subjects with insomnia and stable across time.
Zopiclone
Zopiclone is a cyclopyrrolone derivative thought to act on the GABAA receptor complex (Wadworth and McTavish, 1993). Although zopiclone and its enantiomer, eszopiclone, are not receptor subtype-specific, zopiclone has been shown to have high affinity binding sites in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum, and greater affinity for the α1 and α2 subunits than benzodiazepines, while eszopiclone has high affinity and potency for the α2 and α3 subunits (Najib, 2006; Nutt and Stahl, 2010).
Zopiclone has an elimination half-life of 3.5–6.5 h (Hajak, 1999). Zopiclone is not approved for the treatment of insomnia in United States due to its risk of abuse, and, likewise, is not available in other countries worldwide.
Effect on sleep pattern and sleep regulation
Zopiclone may modify sleep patterns, although studies investigating its effects on circadian sleep regulation are few and heterogeneous in nature, limiting definitive conclusions.
One study (Holmedahl et al., 2015) reported reductions in NREM 1 sleep (range, 3–8%) and increased NREM 2 sleep (range, 2–8%) within the TST in patients treated with 5 mg zopiclone vs. placebo.
Zopiclone 7.5 mg improved sleep continuity and increased stage 4 sleep in elderly healthy volunteers relative to placebo and temazepam, suggesting the specific action of zopiclone at the GABA-A benzodiazepine receptor complex may be responsible for its superior effect on sleep architecture (Hemmeter et al., 2000). Similarly, zopiclone 7.5 mg also increased deep sleep in elderly patients with insomnia (Mouret et al., 1990).
The effects of zopiclone also differed from those of classical BZDs in two studies (Mouret et al., 1990; Hemmeter et al., 2000) which found an increase in deep sleep among users of 3.5 mg zopiclone relative to placebo (Mouret et al., 1990) or temazepam (Hemmeter et al., 2000). A separate placebo-controlled study also demonstrated a decrease SWS after 6 weeks of treatment with zopiclone 7.5 mg in adults with insomnia (Sivertsen et al., 2006).
The effect of zolpidem 7.5 mg on REM sleep was assessed in two studies, which identified a reduced percentage of time spent in REM sleep (Leufkens et al., 2014) and, compared with placebo, a significant decrease in the density of REM sleep itself (Hemmeter et al., 2000) (for an overview see Louzada et al., 2021).
One study investigated the effect of zopiclone on circadian rhythms. In this study, which compared the effect of zaleplon to triazolam and zopiclone on melatonin secretion in rabbits, zopiclone did not affect plasma melatonin levels (Noguchi et al., 2003). Zaleplon increased a dose-dependent concentration of melatonin in rabbit plasma collected at 30 min after intravenous administration at doses of 1 and 2 mg/kg. In contrast, zopiclone failed to affect the plasma melatonin level.
Effect on sleep-related synaptic plasticity
No studies have directly investigated the effect of zaleplon on brain plasticity. Indeed, only one small study has investigated its effect on sleep-dependent memory consolidation, which showed that zopiclone may affect memory storage during sleep (Silva et al., 2003). Authors compared the effect of a single bedtime dose of brotizolam (0.25 mg) and zopiclone (7.5 mg), on memory storage in eight healthy volunteers as previously described. Brotizolam did not affect the morning recall compared to placebo, but subjects remembered significantly fewer words under zopiclone treatment, compared with placebo, suggesting that zopiclone could affect the storage of memory during sleep. Since zopiclone may modify the homeostatic process of sleep regulation impairing SWS, which is believed to reflect mechanisms of neural plasticity (Abel et al., 2013), it could be possible that zopiclone affects processes of sleep-dependent brain plasticity.
Effect on stress-related brain systems
Only a few studies have evaluated zopiclone in relation to the stress system. Indeed, it is uncertain whether zopiclone has an anxiolytic effect or has no effect on HPA axis.
The most widely used behavioral tests of anxiolytic properties of drugs are the conflict models. In order to test the generality of the effects observed on the plus-maze, authors compared the effects of zopiclone to those of diazepam and alprazolam on the Vogel water-lick suppression test. In the present study, it was found that zopiclone exerted an anxiolytic effect at all doses tested, qualitatively similar to those of the benzodiazepines diazepam and alprazolam (Carlson et al., 2001).
As mentioned previously, a study, which assessed the basal hormonal output measured after the administration of various benzodiazepine ligands in mice, showed that zolpidem strongly activates the HPA axis whereas diazepam and zopiclone had no effect on corticosterone (Mikkelsen et al., 2005).
Eszopiclone
Eszopiclone is the S-isomer of racemic zopiclone. Although eszopiclone interacts with the GABAA receptor complex, it has a different binding profile and modulates the receptor complex in a unique manner having affinity for the GABA receptor α1 subunit as well as binding to the α2 and α3 subunits, which suggests the possibility that eszopiclone has both hypnotic and anxiolytic effects (Nutt and Stahl, 2010; Greenblatt and Zammit, 2012).
Eszopiclone is rapidly absorbed following oral administration, with peak serum concentrations at 1–1.3 h (Halas, 2006; Hair et al., 2008a,b; Rösner et al., 2018). The efficacy of eszopiclone has been evaluated in healthy adults, including elderly patients with insomnia. Compared to placebo, eszopiclone has been shown to considerably reduces sleep latency and improves sleep maintenance, duration, and quality (Halas, 2006; Hair et al., 2008a,b; Rösner et al., 2018). Accordingly, recommended clinical dosages are about 50% lower for eszopiclone compared to racemic zopiclone (Greenblatt and Zammit, 2012). The recommended starting dose for eszopiclone was initially 2 mg in non-elderly adults and 1 mg for elderly patients, (Hair et al., 2008a) but was lowered to 1 mg for all age and sex groups by a current FDA safety alert (FDA, 2014, 2019b) due to the risk of next-day impairments (Boyle et al., 2012) as shown in a randomized, double-blind cross-over study (Boyle et al., 2012) or sleep-related complex behaviors. The maximum recommended dose of eszopiclone is 3 mg in non-elderly and 2 mg in elderly subjects (Rösner et al., 2018).
Effect on sleep pattern and sleep regulation
In patients with insomnia, eszopiclone 1, 2, and 3 mg increased total sleep time and stage 2 sleep, but did not alter REM or SWS (Monti and Pandi-Perumal, 2007; Uchimura et al., 2012; Abad and Guilleminault, 2018). No studies have been conducted on its effect on the circadian regulation of sleep.
The hypnotic effects of eszopiclone have been described in experimental studies including a recent comparison with zolpidem on the power spectra of the EEG in the guinea pig (Ye and Garcia-Rill, 2009). This study showed that eszopiclone significantly increased NREM sleep, decreased the latency to NREM sleep, and increased the latency to REM sleep. Eszopiclone specifically increased delta band and decreased theta band activity, suggesting that delta sleep intensity was increased compared to zolpidem (Ye and Garcia-Rill, 2009).
Effect on sleep-related synaptic plasticity
Eszopiclone does not appear to affect synaptic plasticity or enhance adult hippocampal neurogenesis, although studies are limited to animal models.
The effect of eszopiclone on brain plasticity was studied in vivo. In a recent study the effects of trazodone, zaleplon, and eszopiclone in a canonical model of sleep-dependent, in vivo synaptic plasticity in the primary visual cortex were studied. Cats underwent 6 h of continuous waking combined with monocular deprivation to trigger synaptic remodeling. Cats subsequently received either vehicle, trazodone (10 mg/kg), zaleplon (10 mg/kg), or eszopiclone (1–10 mg/kg). Authors found that only trazodone significantly impaired sleep-dependent consolidation plasticity (Aton et al., 2009).
A sleep-related gene-expression study in mice assessed the expression of plasticity-related genes to assess synaptic plasticity changes during drug-induced sleep (Gerashchenko et al., 2017). This study found that changes in gene expression associated with synaptic plasticity can occur in the cortex in the presence of eszopiclone, suggesting that eszopiclone does not impair synaptic plasticity in the brain (Gerashchenko et al., 2017).
In another study was demonstrated that eszopiclone enhanced hippocampal adult neurogenesis in rats, suggesting that eszopiclone, presumably acting as a GABA receptor agonist, has pro-neurogenic effects in the dentate gyrus of the adult hippocampal (Methippara et al., 2010). Authors examined the effects of daily administration of eszopiclone compared with vehicle, on dentate gyrus cell proliferation and neurogenesis, and on sleep–wake patterns. Eszopiclone treatment for 7 days did not affect the rate of cell proliferation but twice-daily administration for 2 weeks increased survival of newborn cells by 46%. NREM sleep was increased on day 1, but not on days 7 or 14. Delta sleep was increased on days 1 and 7 of treatment, but not on day 14. The present study suggested that eszopiclone presumably acting as a GABA agonist, has pro-neurogenic effects in the adult neurogenesis (Methippara et al., 2010).
Effect on stress-related brain systems
Eszopiclone may induce anxiolytic action in a dose-dependent manner, however, further studies are needed to clarify this.
Animal studies have suggested an anxiolytic effect of eszopiclone. Specifically, eszopiclone 1 and 3 mg/kg suppressed stressor-induced anxiety-like behavior in foot shock-induced anxious rats, with a tendency for attenuating stressor-induced suppression of REM sleep (Huang et al., 2010) In addition, eszopiclone at 1 mg/kg had no effect on contextual memory, but contextual memory was significantly reduced with increased dosage. These results suggest that eszopiclone may attenuated stress-induced anxiety-like behavior in animals. Eszopiclone was also found to stimulate the HPA axis in rats, with dose-dependent increases in plasma levels of ACTH and corticosterone observed (Pechnick et al., 2011).
In another study the effects of three different doses (1, 3, and 10 mg/kg) of eszopiclone and zolpidem on the states of sleep and wakefulness, levels of anxiety-like behavior, and long-term contextual memory in footshock-induced anxious rats were explored. In addition, the administration of eszopiclone at 1 and 3 mg/kg doses suppressed stressor-induced anxiety-like behavior. The administration of zolpidem at 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg doses was not effective in attenuating stressor-induced anxiety-like behavior. Contextual memory after administration of eszopiclone at 1 mg/kg dose had no effects, but was reduced significantly with increased dosage. Contextual memory after administration of zolpidem, at all three doses, was severely disrupted. The results of this study suggested that eszopiclone but not zolpidem may attenuated stress induced anxiety like behavior in animals (Huang et al., 2010).
In another study the effects of eszopiclone on the HPA axis in the rat (Pechnick et al., 2011) was evaluated. Rats were injected with saline or eszopiclone. The acute administration of eszopiclone produced dose-dependent increases in plasma levels of ACTH and corticosterone, and tolerance developed to these effects after repeated drug administration. Pretreatment with eszopiclone did not affect stress-induced stimulation of the HPA axis. These results show that eszopiclone and the benzodiazepine-like drugs differentially affect the HPA axis (Pechnick et al., 2011).
Zaleplon
The pyrazolopyrimidine zaleplon (N-[3-(3-cyanopyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-7-yl)phenyl]-N-ethylacetamide) exhibits a pharmacological profile that is similar overall to that of zolpidem and acts preferentially at GABAA receptors containing the α1 subunit (Concas et al., 1994; Sanna et al., 2002). However, the potency of zaleplon to modulate the function of GABAA receptors containing α1, α2, or α3 subunits is lower than zolpidem (Sanna et al., 2002). Zaleplon binds to α1-containing receptors with an affinity that is 12, 10, or 27 times that apparent for its interaction with the corresponding receptors containing the α2, α3, or α5 subunits, respectively (Dämgen and Lüddens, 1999). However, the potency of zaleplon at these various receptors was one-third to one-half that of zolpidem (Sanna et al., 2002). The intrinsic activity and potency of zaleplon as an allosteric modulator of GABAA receptor subtypes suggested that zaleplon is similar to that of the hypnotic benzodiazepines flurazepam, triazolam, and diazepam (Sanna et al., 2002). Its half-life is ultra-short, around 1 h (Terzano et al., 2003). In non-elderly and elderly patients with insomnia, zaleplon, at the usual recommended dosage of 5 and 10 mg taken at bedtime, significantly reduced sleep latency compared with placebo and 5 and 10 mg at bedtime significantly reduced sleep latency compared with placebo in clinical trials in non-elderly and elderly patients with insomnia (Terzano et al., 2003). Zaleplon 10 mg has also been shown to be free of residual hypnotic or sedative effects despite nocturnal administration as little as 2 h before waking in normal subjects compared with zolpidem (Danjou et al., 1999). In April 2019, the FDA added a Boxed Warning for Z-drugs, including zaleplon, advising that rare but serious injuries have happened because of sleep behaviors, including sleepwalking, sleep driving, and engaging in other activities while not fully awake (Greenblatt and Zammit, 2012; Park et al., 2016; FDA, 2019a; Harbourt et al., 2020; Westermeyer and Carr, 2020).
Effect on sleep pattern and sleep regulation
Zaleplon may increase SWS in the early phases, as seen in polysomnographic studies in humans, and may decrease the percentage of REM sleep (Fry et al., 2000).
Zaleplon was also shown to promote melatonin secretion in rabbits in a dose-dependent manner, with the increase in zaleplon-induced plasma melatonin levels not blocked by the benzodiazepine-receptor antagonist, flumazenil (Noguchi et al., 2003). These results may suggest that zaleplon influences chronobiology.
Zaleplon increased a dose-dependent concentration of melatonin in rabbit plasma collected at 30 min after intravenous administration at doses of 1 and 2 mg/kg. In contrast, triazolam and zopiclone failed to affect the plasma melatonin level. These results of the present studies suggest that zaleplon may promote melatonin secretion and the elevation of plasma levels of melatonin may suggest an influence of zaleplon on chronobiology (Noguchi et al., 2003).
Effect on stress-related brain systems
No studies have been conducted on the effect of zaleplon on the stress system.
Effect on sleep-related synaptic plasticity
Zaleplon may not affect brain plasticity or sleep-depended memory processes, although only a few studies have been conducted to date.
As mentioned previously, the effect of zaleplon on brain synaptic plasticity was studied (Aton et al., 2009). Authors found that while zaleplon and eszopiclone had profound effects on sleeping cortical electroencephalographic activity, only trazodone, which did not alter EEG activity, significantly impaired sleep-dependent consolidation of ocular dominance plasticity (Aton et al., 2009).
In a study conducted in humans to detect the effect of hypnotics on sleep-dependent memory consolidation, authors compared bedtime administration of zolpidem-ER 12.5 mg, zaleplon 10 mg in 22 healthy volunteers with zaleplon not affecting sleep dependent plasticity (Hall-Porter et al., 2014). The authors suggested that the drug-free period of sleep early in the night may have been sufficient for sleep-dependent memory consolidation to occur, although this hypothesis remains to be confirmed.
Discussion
Since current models of insomnia converge on the hypothesis of insomnia as a stress–related sleep disorder with hyperarousal associated to the central and peripheral activation of the stress system, it is possible that alterations in GABAergic transmission may play a key role. When insomnia is established it is considered a stressful condition, which impairs brain plasticity leading to a state of allostatic overload favoring medical and psychiatric disorders (McEwen, 2003; Meerlo et al., 2009; Lo Martire et al., 2020; Palagini et al., 2021). Consequently, compounds to treat chronic insomnia should ideally regulate arousal, homeostatic and circadian rhythm sleep processes, the stress system, and synaptic plasticity, or, at the very least, compounds should not alter neural plasticity.
In the framework of modern insomnia models, compounds which bind the GABAA receptor and act as positive allosteric modulators, which are already widely used in the treatment of insomnia, may still represent important compounds. Indeed, some differences have emerged at the physiological level among these compounds, which may benefit the treatment of insomnia in clinical practice.
In particular, hypnotic benzodiazepines enhance inhibitory signals to cell groups regulating arousal and inhibit arousal promoting neurotransmission (Riemann et al., 2015), and, in contrast to molecules that have a greater binding affinity to the α-1 rather than the α2 or α3 GABAA receptors, hold an hypnoinducing effect by also binding, with similar high affinity, other GABAA receptor α subunits including those able to reduce the neuroendocrine response to stress effects (Sanna et al., 2002; Carrasco and Van de Kar, 2003; Engin et al., 2018). This action may be extremely useful to both sleep inducing/regulating effects and in regulating overload of the stress system related to insomnia.
Among short-medium acting compounds, some differences have emerged at the molecular level. For example, among the short-medium acting benzodiazepines, triazolam, the most studied compound, may exert an important role in regulating allostasis by regulating the stress system at different levels. Moreover, by deactivating the basal forebrain and amygdaloid complexes of human subjects during non-REM sleep, triazolam may also exert an important sleep-related stress system regulation effect. On the other hand, eszopiclone, thanks to its peculiar action on α2 and α3 subunits, is emerging as a favorable compound able to exert an anxiolytic effect. However, more extensive studies are needed to clarify this topic.
Since insomnia may impair synaptic neuroplasticity it should be of importance to use, in clinical practice, compounds that are able to not additional disrupt it. In this framework, some compounds may produce more “physiological” sleep based on polysomnography while other compounds may alter sleep architecture and may affect homeostatic/circadian sleep processes, sleep functions, and consequently synaptic plasticity (Seibt et al., 2008).
Among the hypnotic benzodiazepines, brotizolam and triazolam at therapeutic dosages may reduce REM, which is increased in patients with insomnia, with no effect probably on ultradian processes of sleep regulation (Borbély and Achermann, 1991). In particular, data in human and animal studies showed that triazolam may also facilitate re-entrainment of circadian rhythms hence contributing to the regulation of sleep processes. Among Z-drugs, eszopiclone showed a better sleep profile, however, the regulation of circadian rhythms need to be further explored.
Indeed, it is emerging that the effect on sleep pattern may be important for sleep-dependent neural plasticity; preferentially biding α1 GABAA-receptors with hypnotic-sedative effects may impair neural plasticity, while binding with equal affinity to different GABAA receptor subtypes may not affect this property. This has been demonstrated for triazolam in in vivo experimental models, which failed to impair brain plasticity during sleep compared with zolpidem (Seibt et al., 2008). Hence, among the benzodiazepines, triazolam is emerging as the compound with studies showing that its use at therapeutical doses does not impair sleep-dependent brain plasticity and may indeed be contributing to regulating sleep processes. Among Z-drugs, eszopiclone and zaleplon have also been shown to not affect sleep-dependent synaptic plasticity when compared with trazodone, an antidepressant used in the treatment of insomnia.
On the other hand, data on sleep-regulating effects on the stress system and synaptic plasticity are inconclusive or negative regarding temazepam, lormetazepam, zolpidem, and zopiclone. In particular, no studies have been conducted for lormetazepam on either brain plasticity or on its effect on the stress system, and great concern is emerging regarding the potential of abuse of its drop formulation. Data on zolpidem shows that it may affect sleep processes, synaptic plasticity, and sleep-dependent memory consolidation, but it may not regulate the stress system
Conclusion
Current models of insomnia may revise the way in which we use hypnotic compounds in clinical practice. Ideally, compounds should regulate arousal, sleep processes, the stress system, and, at the very least, should not impair neural plasticity during sleep. Targeting GABAA receptors may favor arousal control, but, depending on the compound used, sleep processes, the stress system, and synaptic plasticity may be impaired. Hypnotic benzodiazepines may be important options, because instead of producing a sedative action, they hold an hypnoinducing effect by binding with similar affinity different GABAA receptor α subunits and by reducing neuroendocrine response to stress effects. Among them, triazolam has been the most studied compound with important effects observed on sleep processes, the stress system, and neural plasticity, which may be favorable for treating insomnia in the short term (<4 weeks). Among Z-drugs, eszopiclone has emerged as having a preferential profile on sleep, the stress system, and neural plasticity, although more studies are needed. In this framework, at therapeutical dosages over the short-term treatment (≤4 weeks) the benzodiazepine, triazolam, and the Z-drug, eszopiclone, may be favorable choices for the “brain” when treating patients with insomnia. Since discontinuation has been a challenge in clinical practice during the last few years, available data currently provide new opportunities to favor the use of CBT-I (Riemann et al., 2017) or the use of prolonged release melatonin 2 mg to exert a protective and chronobiotic action on the brain (for an overview see Biggio et al., 2021; Palagini et al., 2021), which must be taken into account.
Author contributions
LP wrote the manuscript. CB supervised the final version. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
Editorial expertise was provided by Melanie Gatt (PhD), an independent medical writer, on behalf of Health Publishing & Services Srl and was funded by Pfizer.
Conflict of interest
LP received honoraria from Health Publishing & Services Srl funded by Pfizer. CB was employed by Pfizer. This manuscript received funding from Pfizer. The funder has not been involved in the review process, no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abad, V. C., and Guilleminault, C. (2018). Insomnia in elderly patients: recommendations for pharmacological management. Drugs Aging 35, 791–817. doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-0569-8
Abel, T., Havekes, R., Saletin, J. M., and Walker, M. P. (2013). Sleep, plasticity and memory from molecules to whole-brain networks. Curr. Biol. 23, R774–R788. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.025
Ambrosi, F., Ricci, S., Quartesan, R., Moretti, P., Pelicci, G., Pagliacci, C., et al. (1986). Effects of acute benzodiazepine administration on growth hormone, prolactin and cortisol release after moderate insulin-induced hypoglycemia in normal women. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 88, 187–189. doi: 10.1007/bf00652238
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). D-TF, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders: DSM-5™, 5th Edn. Washinghton: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
Anand, A., Saraf, M. K., and Prabhakar, S. (2007). Sustained inhibition of brotizolam induced anterograde amnesia by norharmane and retrograde amnesia by L-glutamic acid in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 182, 12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.04.022
Arbon, E. L., Knurowska, M., and Dijk, D. J. (2015). Randomised clinical trial of the effects of prolonged-release melatonin, temazepam and zolpidem on slow-wave activity during sleep in healthy people. J. Psychopharmacol. 29, 764–776. doi: 10.1177/0269881115581963
Aton, S. J., Seibt, J., Dumoulin, M. C., Coleman, T., Shiraishi, M., and Frank, M. G. (2009). The sedating antidepressant trazodone impairs sleep-dependent cortical plasticity. PLoS One 4:e6078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006078
Backhaus, J., Junghanns, K., Born, J., Hohaus, K., Faasch, F., and Hohagen, F. (2006). Impaired declarative memory consolidation during sleep in patients with primary insomnia: influence of sleep architecture and nocturnal cortisol release. Biol. Psychiatry 60, 1324–1330. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.051
Baglioni, C., Nanovska, S., Regen, W., Spiegelhalder, K., Feige, B., Nissen, C., et al. (2016). Sleep and mental disorders: a meta-analysis of polysomnographic research. Psychol. Bull. 142, 969–990. doi: 10.1037/bul0000053
Beary, M. D., Lacey, J. H., and Bhat, A. V. (1983). The neuro-endocrine impact of 3-hydroxy-diazepam (temazepam) in women. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 79, 295–297. doi: 10.1007/bf00433404
Benard, V., Etain, B., Vaiva, G., Boudebesse, C., Yeim, S., Benizri, C., et al. (2019). Sleep and circadian rhythms as possible trait markers of suicide attempt in bipolar disorders: an actigraphy study. J. Affect. Dis. 244, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.054
Bhat, R., Axtell, R., Mitra, A., Miranda, M., Lock, C., Tsien, R. W., et al. (2010). Inhibitory role for GABA in autoimmune inflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 2580–2585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0915139107
Biggio, G. (1983). Benzodiazepine Recognition Site Ligands: Biochemistry and Pharmacology. New York: Raven Press.
Biggio, G., Biggio, F., Talani, G., Mostallino, M. C., Aguglia, A., Aguglia, E., et al. (2021). Melatonin: from neurobiology to treatment. Brain Sci. 11:1121. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11091121
Biggio, G., Brodie, B. B., Costa, E., and Guidotti, A. (1977). Mechanisms by which diazepam, muscimol, and other drugs change the content of cGMP in cerebellar cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 3592–3596. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.8.3592
Biggio, G., Concas, A., and Costa, E. (1992). GABAergic Synaptic Transmission (Advances in Biochemical Psychopharmacology). New York: Raven Press.
Biggio, G., Concas, A., Corda, M. G., and Serra, M. (1989). Enhancement of GABAergic transmission by zolpidem, an imidazopyridine with preferential affinity for type I benzodiazepine receptors. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 161, 173–180. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(89)90840-6
Biggio, G., Concas, A., Corda, M. G., Giorgi, O., Sanna, E., and Serra, M. (1990). GABAergic and dopaminergic transmission in the rat cerebral cortex: effect of stress, anxiolytic and anxiogenic drugs. Pharmacol. Ther. 48, 121–142. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(90)90077-f
Biggio, G., Corda, M. G., Concas, A., Demontis, G., Rossetti, Z., and Gessa, G. L. (1981). Rapid changes in GABA binding induced by stress in different areas of the rat brain. Brain Res. 229, 363–369. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)91000-3
Bixler, E. O., Kales, J. D., Kales, A., Jacoby, J. A., and Soldatos, C. R. (1985). Rebound insomnia and elimination half-life: assessment of individual subject response. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 25, 115–124.
Bollinger, J. L., Horchar, M. J., and Wohleb, E. S. (2020). Diazepam limits microglia-mediated neuronal remodeling in the prefrontal cortex and associated behavioral consequences following chronic unpredictable stress. Neuropsychopharmacology 45, 1766–1776. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-0720-1
Borbély, A. A., and Achermann, P. (1991). Ultradian dynamics of sleep after a single dose of benzodiazepine hypnotics. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 195, 11–18. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(91)90376-2
Boyle, J., Groeger, J. A., Paska, W., Cooper, J. A., Rockett, C., Jones, S., et al. (2012). A method to assess the dissipation of the [corrected] residual effects of [corrected] hypnotics: eszopiclone versus zopiclone. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 32, 704–709. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3182664eec
Braestrup, C., and Squires, R. F. (1977). Specific benzodiazepine receptors in rat brain characterized by high-affinity (3H)diazepam binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 3805–3809. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.9.3805
Buxton, O. M., Copinschi, G., Van Onderbergen, A., Karrison, T. G., and Van Cauter, E. (2000). A benzodiazepine hypnotic facilitates adaptation of circadian rhythms and sleep-wake homeostasis to an eight hour delay shift simulating westward jet lag. Sleep 23, 915–927.
Carlson, J. N., Haskew, R., Wacker, J., Maisonneuve, I. M., Glick, S. D., and Jerussi, T. P. (2001). Sedative and anxiolytic effects of zopiclone’s enantiomers and metabolite. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 415, 181–189. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)00851-2
Carrasco, G. A., and Van de Kar, L. D. (2003). Neuroendocrine pharmacology of stress. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 463, 235–272. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(03)01285-8
Chiu, H. Y., Lee, H. C., Liu, J. W., Hua, S. J., Chen, P. Y., Tsai, P. S., et al. (2021). Comparative efficacy and safety of hypnotics for insomnia in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sleep 44:260. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa260
Coleman, D. E., and Ota, K. (2004). Hallucinations with zolpidem and fluoxetine in an impaired driver. J. Forensic Sci. 49, 392–393.
Concas, A., Serra, M., Santoro, G., Maciocco, E., Cuccheddu, T., and Biggio, G. (1994). The effect of cyclopyrrolones on GABAA receptor function is different from that of benzodiazepines. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 350, 294–300. doi: 10.1007/bf00175035
Copinschi, G., Akseki, E., Moreno-Reyes, R., Leproult, R., L’Hermite-Balériaux, M., Caufriez, A., et al. (1995). Effects of bedtime administration of zolpidem on circadian and sleep-related hormonal profiles in normal women. Sleep 18, 417–424. doi: 10.1093/sleep/18.6.417
Corda, M. G., and Biggio, G. (1986). Stress and GABAergic transmission: biochemical and behavioural studies. Adv. Biochem. Psychopharmacol. 41, 121–136.
Cosgrave, J., Wulff, K., and Gehrman, P. (2018). Sleep, circadian rhythms, and schizophrenia: where we are and where we need to go. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 31, 176–182. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000419
Costa, E., Sterzi, E., Tedeschi, F., Casari, R., Marini, P., and Lugoboni, F. (2021). Can oral formulation increase the risk of lormetazepam abuse? Int. Emerg Med. 16, 785–788. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02538-2
Crestani, F., Low, K., Keist, R., Mandelli, M., Mohler, H., and Rudolph, U. (2001). Molecular targets for the myorelaxant action of diazepam. Mol. Pharmacol. 59, 442–445. doi: 10.1124/mol.59.3.442
Crestani, F., Martin, J. R., Möhler, H., and Rudolph, U. (2000). Mechanism of action of the hypnotic zolpidem in vivo. Br. J. Pharmacol. 131, 1251–1254. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703717
Dallaspezia, S., and Benedetti, F. (2015). Chronobiology of bipolar disorder: therapeutic implication. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 17:606. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0606-9
Dämgen, K., and Lüddens, H. (1999). Zaleplon displays a selectivity to recombinant GABAA receptors different from zolipdem, zopiclone and benzodiazepines. Neurosci. Res. Commun. 25, 139–148. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6769(199911/12)25:33.0.co;2-w
Danjou, P., Paty, I., Fruncillo, R., Worthington, P., Unruh, M., Cevallos, W., et al. (1999). A comparison of the residual effects of zaleplon and zolpidem following administration 5 to 2 h before awakening. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 48, 367–374. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00024.x
de Vivo, L., Bellesi, M., Marshall, W., Bushong, E. A., Ellisman, M. H., Tononi, G., et al. (2017). Ultrastructural evidence for synaptic scaling across the wake/sleep cycle. Science 355, 507–510. doi: 10.1126/science.aah5982
DeKosky, S. T., and Williamson, J. B. (2020). The long and the short of benzodiazepines and sleep medications: short-term benefits, long-term harms? Neurotherapeutics 17, 153–155. doi: 10.1007/s13311-019-00827-z
DeWoskin, D., Myung, J., Belle, M. D., Piggins, H. D., Takumi, T., and Forger, D. B. (2015). Distinct roles for GABA across multiple timescales in mammalian circadian timekeeping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, E3911–E3919. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420753112
Diana, M., Quílez, J., and Rafecas, M. (2014). Gamma-aminobutyric acid as a bioactive compound in foods: a review. J. Funct. Foods 10, 407–420. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2014.07.004
Dias, R., Sheppard, W. F., Fradley, R. L., Garrett, E. M., Stanley, J. L., Tye, S. J., et al. (2005). Evidence for a significant role of alpha 3-containing GABAA receptors in mediating the anxiolytic effects of benzodiazepines. J. Neurosci. 25, 10682–10688. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.1166-05.2005
Donaldson, E., and Kennaway, D. J. (1991). Effects of temazepam on sleep, performance, and rhythmic 6-sulphatoxymelatonin and cortisol excretion after transmeridian travel. Aviat Space Environ. Med. 62, 654–660.
Elko, C. J., Burgess, J. L., and Robertson, W. O. (1998). Zolpidem-associated hallucinations and serotonin reuptake inhibition: a possible interaction. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 36, 195–203. doi: 10.3109/15563659809028939
Engin, E., Benham, R. S., and Rudolph, U. (2018). An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABA(A) receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 39, 710–732. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2018.04.003
Erman, M. K., Loewy, D. B., and Scharf, M. B. (2005). Effects of temazepam 7.5 mg and temazepam 15 mg on sleep maintenance and sleep architecture in a model of transient insomnia. Curr. Med. Res. Opin 21, 223–230. doi: 10.1185/030079905x25541
Faccini, M., Tamburin, S., Casari, R., Morbioli, L., and Lugoboni, F. (2019). High-dose lormetazepam dependence: strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Int. Emerg Med. 14, 1271–1278. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02101-8
FDA (2014). Lunesta (eszopiclone) FDA Drug Safety Communication [Online]. Available online at: https://www.pdr.net/fda-drug-safety-communication/lunesta?druglabelid=2082&id=11808#:~:text=The%20U.S.%20Food%20and%20Drug,to%201%20mg%20at%20bedtime. (accessed February 3, 2022)
FDA (2019a). FDA Adds Boxed Warning for Risk Of Serious Injuries Caused By Sleepwalking With Certain Prescription Insomnia Medicines [Online]. Available online at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-risk-serious-injuries-caused-sleepwalking-certain-prescription-insomnia (accessed February 3, 2022)
FDA (2019b). FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA Warns Of Next-Day Impairment With Sleep Aid Lunesta (Eszopiclone) And Lowers Recommended Dose [Online]. Available online at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug-safety-communication-fda-warns-next-day-impairment-sleep-aid-lunesta-eszopiclone-and-lowers
Feinberg, I., Maloney, T., and Campbell, I. G. (2000). Effects of hypnotics on the sleep EEG of healthy young adults: new data and psychopharmacologic implications. J. Psychiatr. Res. 34, 423–438. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(00)00038-8
Fernandez-Mendoza, J., and Vgontzas, A. N. (2013). Insomnia and its impact on physical and mental health. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 15:418. doi: 10.1007/s11920-013-0418-8
Ferrarese, C., Appollonio, I., Bianchi, G., Frigo, M., Marzorati, C., Pecora, N., et al. (1993). Benzodiazepine receptors and diazepam binding inhibitor: a possible link between stress, anxiety and the immune system. Psychoneuroendocrinology 18, 3–22. doi: 10.1016/0306-4530(93)90051-l
Ferrari, L. L., Park, D., Zhu, L., Palmer, M. R., Broadhurst, R. Y., and Arrigoni, E. (2018). Regulation of lateral hypothalamic orexin activity by local GABAergic neurons. J. Neurosci. 38, 1588–1599.
Fitzgerald, A. C., Wright, B. T., and Heldt, S. A. (2014). The behavioral pharmacology of zolpidem: evidence for the functional significance of α1-containing GABA(A) receptors. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 231, 1865–1896. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3457-x
Fogaça, M. V., and Duman, R. S. (2019). Cortical GABAergic dysfunction in stress and depression: new insights for therapeutic interventions. Front. Cell Neurosci. 13:87. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00087
Fraschini, F., and Stankov, B. (1993). Temazepam: pharmacological profile of a benzodiazepine and new trends in its clinical application. Pharmacol. Res. 27, 97–113. doi: 10.1006/phrs.1993.1011
Fries, E., Hellhammer, D. H., and Hellhammer, J. (2006). Attenuation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responsivity to the trier social stress test by the benzodiazepine alprazolam. Psychoneuroendocrinology 31, 1278–1288. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2006.09.009
Fry, J., Scharf, M., Mangano, R., and Fujimori, M. (2000). Zaleplon improves sleep without producing rebound effects in outpatients with insomnia. zaleplon clinical study group. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 15, 141–152. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200015030-00003
Gallet, Q., Bouteloup, V., Locatelli, M., Habert, M. O., Chupin, M., Delrieu, J., et al. (2021). Benzodiazepine use and neuroimaging markers of Alzheimer’s disease in nondemented older individuals: an MRI and 18F florbetapir PET study in the MEMENTO cohort. Neuropsychopharmacology doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01246-5
Geoffroy, P. A., Hoertel, N., Etain, B., Bellivier, F., Delorme, R., Limosin, F., et al. (2018). Insomnia and hypersomnia in major depressive episode: prevalence, sociodemographic characteristics and psychiatric comorbidity in a population-based study. J. Affect. Dis. 226, 132–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.032
Gerashchenko, D., Pasumarthi, R. K., and Kilduff, T. S. (2017). Plasticity-related gene expression during eszopiclone-induced sleep. Sleep 40:98. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsx098
Gilabert-Juan, J., Castillo-Gomez, E., Guirado, R., Molto, M. D., and Nacher, J. (2013). Chronic stress alters inhibitory networks in the medial prefrontal cortex of adult mice. Brain Struct. Funct. 218, 1591–1605. doi: 10.1007/s00429-012-0479-1
Gottesmann, C. (2002). GABA mechanisms and sleep. Neuroscience 111, 231–239. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00034-9
Greenblatt, D. J., and Zammit, G. K. (2012). Pharmacokinetic evaluation of eszopiclone: clinical and therapeutic implications. Exp. Opin. Drug Metab Toxicol. 8, 1609–1618. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2012.741588
Hadingham, K. L., Wingrove, P., Le Bourdelles, B., Palmer, K. J., Ragan, C. I., and Whiting, P. J. (1993). Cloning of cDNA sequences encoding human alpha 2 and alpha 3 gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptor subunits and characterization of the benzodiazepine pharmacology of recombinant alpha 1-, alpha 2-, alpha 3-, and alpha 5-containing human gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 43, 970–975.
Hair, P. I., McCormack, P. L., and Curran, M. P. (2008a). Eszopiclone: a review of its use in the treatment of insomnia. Drugs 68, 1415–1434. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868100-00005
Hair, P. I., McCormack, P. L., and Curran, M. P. (2008b). Spotlight on eszopiclone in insomnia. CNS Drugs 22, 975–978. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200822110-00006
Hajak, G. (1999). A comparative assessment of the risks and benefits of zopiclone: a review of 15 years’ clinical experience. Drug Saf. 21, 457–469. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199921060-00003
Hall-Porter, J. M., Schweitzer, P. K., Eisenstein, R. D., Ahmed, H. A., and Walsh, J. K. (2014). The effect of two benzodiazepine receptor agonist hypnotics on sleep-dependent memory consolidation. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 10, 27–34. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.3352
Harbourt, K., Nevo, O. N., Zhang, R., Chan, V., and Croteau, D. (2020). Association of eszopiclone, zaleplon, or zolpidem with complex sleep behaviors resulting in serious injuries, including death. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 29, 684–691. doi: 10.1002/pds.5004
Heel, R. C., Brogden, R. N., Speight, T. M., and Avery, G. S. (1981). Temazepam: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy as an hypnotic. Drugs 21, 321–340. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198121050-00001
Hemmeter, U., Müller, M., Bischof, R., Annen, B., and Holsboer-Trachsler, E. (2000). Effect of zopiclone and temazepam on sleep EEG parameters, psychomotor and memory functions in healthy elderly volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 147, 384–396. doi: 10.1007/s002130050007
Hertenstein, E., Feige, B., Gmeiner, T., Kienzler, C., Spiegelhalder, K., Johann, A., et al. (2019). Insomnia as a predictor of mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med. Rev. 43, 96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2018.10.006
Holmedahl, N. H., Øverland, B., Fondenes, O., Ellingsen, I., and Hardie, J. A. (2015). Zopiclone effects on breathing at sleep in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Sleep Breath 19, 921–930. doi: 10.1007/s11325-014-1084-8
Huang, M. P., Radadia, K., Macone, B. W., Auerbach, S. H., and Datta, S. (2010). Effects of eszopiclone and zolpidem on sleep-wake behavior, anxiety-like behavior and contextual memory in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 210, 54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.02.018
Ishiko, J., Inagaki, C., and Takaori, S. (1983). Effects of diazepam, nitrazepam and brotizolam on dopamine turnover in the olfactory tubercle, nucleus accumbens and caudate nucleus of rats. JPN J. Pharmacol. 33, 706–708. doi: 10.1254/jjp.33.706
Jie, F., Yin, G., Yang, W., Yang, M., Gao, S., Lv, J., et al. (2018). Stress in regulation of GABA amygdala system and relevance to neuropsychiatric diseases. Front. Neurosci. 12:562. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00562
Jobert, M., Poiseau, E., Jahnig, P., Schulz, H., and Kubicki, S. (1992). Pattern recognition by matched filtering: an analysis of sleep spindle and K-complex density under the influence of lormetazepam and zopiclone. Neuropsychobiology 26, 100–107. doi: 10.1159/000118902
Kajimura, N., Nishikawa, M., Uchiyama, M., Kato, M., Watanabe, T., Nakajima, T., et al. (2004). Deactivation by benzodiazepine of the basal forebrain and amygdala in normal humans during sleep: a placebo-controlled [15O]H2O PET study. Am. J. Psychiatry 161, 748–751. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.4.748
Kanno, O., Sasaki, T., Watanabe, H., Takazawa, S., Nakagome, K., Nakajima, T., et al. (2000). Comparison of the effects of zolpidem and triazolam on nocturnal sleep and sleep latency in the morning: a cross-over study in healthy young volunteers. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 24, 897–910. doi: 10.1016/s0278-5846(00)00117-2
Kanno, O., Watanabe, H., and Kazamatsuri, H. (1993). Effects of zopiclone, flunitrazepam, triazolam and levomepromazine on the transient change in sleep-wake schedule: polygraphic study, and the evaluation of sleep and daytime condition. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 17, 229–239. doi: 10.1016/0278-5846(93)90044-s
Karlsson, M. O., Schoemaker, R. C., Kemp, B., Cohen, A. F., van Gerven, J. M., Tuk, B., et al. (2000). A pharmacodynamic markov mixed-effects model for the effect of temazepam on sleep. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 68, 175–188. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2000.108669
Kimishima, K., Tanabe, K., Kinoshita, Y., Tokuyoshi, K., Houri, D., and Kobayashi, T. (1984). Effects of brotizolam, a new thieno-triazolo-diazepine derivative, on the central nervous system. JPN J. Pharmacol. 36, 461–475. doi: 10.1254/jjp.36.461
Kovacic, P., and Somanathan, R. (2009). Zolpidem, a clinical hypnotic that affects electronic transfer, alters synaptic activity through potential GABA receptors in the nervous system without significant free radical generation. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2, 52–57. doi: 10.4161/oxim.2.1.7859
Krone, L., Frase, L., Piosczyk, H., Selhausen, P., Zittel, S., Jahn, F., et al. (2017). Top-down control of arousal and sleep: fundamentals and clinical implications. Sleep Med. Rev. 31, 17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2015.12.005
Kubicki, S., Herrmann, W. M., Holler, L., and Haag, C. (1987). On the distribution of REM and NREM sleep under two benzodiazepines with comparable receptor affinity but different kinetic properties. Pharmacopsychiatry 20, 270–277. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1017120
Langley, M. S., and Clissold, S. P. (1988). Brotizolam. a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy as an hypnotic. Drugs 35, 104–122. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198835020-00002
Lelas, S., Rowlett, J. K., Spealman, R. D., Cook, J. M., Ma, C., Li, X., et al. (2002). Role of GABAA/benzodiazepine receptors containing alpha 1 and alpha 5 subunits in the discriminative stimulus effects of triazolam in squirrel monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 161, 180–188. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1037-y
Leufkens, T. R., Ramaekers, J. G., de Weerd, A. W., Riedel, W. J., and Vermeeren, A. (2014). Residual effects of zopiclone 7.5 mg on highway driving performance in insomnia patients and healthy controls: a placebo controlled crossover study. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 231, 2785–2798. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3447-z
Licata, S. C., Platt, D. M., Cook, J. M., Van Linn, M. L., and Rowlett, J. K. (2009). Contribution of alpha1 subunit-containing gamma-aminobutyric acidA (GABAA) receptors to motor-impairing effects of benzodiazepines in squirrel monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 203, 539–546. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1401-7
Licata, S. C., Shinday, N. M., Huizenga, M. N., Darnell, S. B., Sangrey, G. R., Rudolph, U., et al. (2013). Alterations in brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the mouse hippocampus following acute but not repeated benzodiazepine treatment. PLoS One 8:e84806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084806
Lo Martire, V., Caruso, D., Palagini, L., Zoccoli, G., and Bastianini, S. (2020). Stress & sleep: a relationship lasting a lifetime. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 117, 65–77. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.024
Louzada, L. L., Machado, F. V., Nóbrega, O. T., and Camargos, E. F. (2021). Zopiclone to treat insomnia in older adults: a systematic review. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 50, 75–92. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.04.013
Luppi, P. H., Peyron, C., and Fort, P. (2017). Not a single but multiple populations of GABAergic neurons control sleep. Sleep Med. Rev. 32, 85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2016.03.002
Lynch, T., Ryan, C., Hughes, C. M., Presseau, J., van Allen, Z. M., Bradley, C. P., et al. (2020). Brief interventions targeting long-term benzodiazepine and Z-drug use in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction 115, 1618–1639. doi: 10.1111/add.14981
Manber, R., Bernert, R. A., Suh, S., Nowakowski, S., Siebern, A. T., and Ong, J. C. (2011). CBT for insomnia in patients with high and low depressive symptom severity: adherence and clinical outcomes. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 7, 645–652. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.1472
Maubach, K. A., Martin, K., Choudhury, H. I., and Seabrook, G. R. (2004). Triazolam suppresses the induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation. Neuroreport 15, 1145–1149. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200405190-00013
Mavanji, V., Perez-Leighton, C. E., Kotz, C. M., Billington, C. J., Parthasarathy, S., Sinton, C. M., et al. (2015). Promotion of wakefulness and energy expenditure by orexin-a in the ventrolateral preoptic area. SLEEP 38, 1361–1370.
McEwen, B. S. (2003). Mood disorders and allostatic load. Biol. Psychiatry 54, 200–207. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00177-x
Mednick, S. C., McDevitt, E. A., Walsh, J. K., Wamsley, E., Paulus, M., Kanady, J. C., et al. (2013). The critical role of sleep spindles in hippocampal-dependent memory: a pharmacology study. J. Neurosci. 33, 4494–4504. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3127-12.2013
Meerlo, P., Mistlberger, R. E., Jacobs, B. L., Heller, H. C., and McGinty, D. (2009). New neurons in the adult brain: the role of sleep and consequences of sleep loss. Sleep Med. Rev. 13, 187–194. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2008.07.004
Meléndez, J., Galli, I., Boric, K., Ortega, A., Zuñiga, L., Henríquez-Roldán, C. F., et al. (2005). Zolpidem and triazolam do not affect the nocturnal sleep-induced memory improvement. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 181, 21–26. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-2228-0
Methippara, M., Bashir, T., Suntsova, N., Szymusiak, R., and McGinty, D. (2010). Hippocampal adult neurogenesis is enhanced by chronic eszopiclone treatment in rats. J. Sleep Res. 19, 384–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2010.00833.x
Mikkelsen, J. D., Søderman, A., Kiss, A., and Mirza, N. (2005). Effects of benzodiazepines receptor agonists on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 519, 223–230. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.06.049
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., and Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535
Montaldo, S., Serra, M., Concas, A., Corda, M. G., Mele, S., and Biggio, G. (1984). Evidence for the presence of benzodiazepine receptor subclasses in different areas of the human brain. Neurosci. Lett. 52, 263–268. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(84)90172-1
Monti, J. M., and Pandi-Perumal, S. R. (2007). Eszopiclone: its use in the treatment of insomnia. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat 3, 441–453.
Monti, J. M., Monti, D., Estevez, F., and Giusti, M. (1996). Sleep in patients with chronic primary insomnia during long-term zolpidem administration and after its withdrawal. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 11, 255–263. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199612000-00007
Morgan, P. T., Kehne, J. H., Sprenger, K. J., and Malison, R. T. (2010). Retrograde effects of triazolam and zolpidem on sleep-dependent motor learning in humans. J. Sleep Res. 19, 157–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00757.x
Morgan, P. T., Pace-Schott, E. F., Mason, G. F., Forselius, E., Fasula, M., Valentine, G. W., et al. (2012). Cortical GABA levels in primary insomnia. Sleep 35, 807–814. doi: 10.5665/sleep.1880
Morin, C. M., and Carrier, J. (2021). The acute effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on insomnia and psychological symptoms. Sleep Med. 77, 346–347. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.06.005
Morin, C. M., Bastien, C. H., Brink, D., and Brown, T. R. (2003). Adverse effects of temazepam in older adults with chronic insomnia. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 18, 75–82. doi: 10.1002/hup.454
Mouret, J., Ruel, D., Maillard, F., and Bianchi, M. (1990). Zopiclone versus triazolam in insomniac geriatric patients: a specific increase in delta sleep with zopiclone. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 5, 47–55.
Najib, J. (2006). Eszopiclone, a nonbenzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic agent for the treatment of transient and chronic insomnia. Clin. Ther. 28, 491–516. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.04.014
Nemeroff, C. B. (2003). The role of GABA in the pathophysiology and treatment of anxiety disorders. Psychopharmacol Bull 37, 133–146.
Nicholson, A. N., and Pascoe, P. A. (1992). Drug induced impairment of performance. Adv. Drug React. Toxicol. Rev. 11, 193–204.
Nobre, B., Rocha, I., Morin, C. M., and Cruz, M. M. E. (2021). Insomnia and circadian misalignment: an underexplored interaction towards cardiometabolic risk. Sleep Sci. 14, 55–63. doi: 10.5935/1984-0063.20200025
Noguchi, H., Kitazumi, K., Mori, M., and Shiba, T. (2002). Binding and neuropharmacological profile of zaleplon, a novel nonbenzodiazepine sedative/hypnotic. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 434, 21–28. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)01502-3
Noguchi, H., Kitazumi, K., Mori, M., Shiobara, Y., and Shiba, T. (2003). Effect of zaleplon, a non-benzodiazepine hypnotic, on melatonin secretion in rabbits. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 93, 204–209. doi: 10.1254/jphs.93.204
Norman, T. R., Piccolo, J., Voudouris, N., and Burrows, G. D. (2001). The effect of single oral doses of zopiclone on nocturnal melatonin secretion in healthy male volunteers. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 25, 825–833. doi: 10.1016/s0278-5846(01)00157-9
Nuss, P. (2015). Anxiety disorders and GABA neurotransmission: a disturbance of modulation. Neuropsychiatr Dis. Treat. 11, 165–175. doi: 10.2147/ndt.s58841
Nutt, D. J., and Stahl, S. M. (2010). Searching for perfect sleep: the continuing evolution of GABAA receptor modulators as hypnotics. J. Psychopharmacol. 24, 1601–1612. doi: 10.1177/0269881109106927
Pakes, G. E., Brogden, R. N., Heel, R. C., Speight, T. M., and Avery, G. S. (1981). Triazolam: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in patients with insomnia. Drugs 22, 81–110. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198122020-00001
Palagini, L., Cipollone, G., Masci, I., Caruso, D., Paolilli, F., Perugi, G., et al. (2019). Insomnia symptoms predict emotional dysregulation, impulsivity and suicidality in depressive bipolar II patients with mixed features. Comput. Psychiatry 89, 46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.12.009
Palagini, L., Manni, R., Aguglia, E., Amore, M., Brugnoli, R., Girardi, P., et al. (2020). Expert opinions and consensus recommendations for the evaluation and management of insomnia in clinical practice: joint statements of five italian scientific societies. Front. Psychiatry 11:558. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00558
Palagini, L., Miniati, M., Marazziti, D., Sharma, V., and Riemann, D. (2021). Association among early life stress, mood features, hopelessness and suicidal risk in bipolar disorder: the potential contribution of insomnia symptoms. J. Psychiatr Res. 135, 52–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.12.069
Park, S. M., Ryu, J., Lee, D. R., Shin, D., Yun, J. M., and Lee, J. (2016). Zolpidem use and risk of fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 27, 2935–2944. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3605-8
Pechnick, R. N., Lacayo, L. M., Manalo, C. M., Bholat, Y., and Spivak, I. (2011). Eszopiclone stimulates the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in the rat. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 661, 22–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.04.016
Pegram, V., Hyde, P., and Linton, P. (1980). Chronic use of triazolam: the effects on the sleep patterns of insomniacs. J. Int. Med. Res. 8, 224–231. doi: 10.1177/030006058000800308
Pigeon, W. R., Pinquart, M., and Conner, K. (2012). Meta-analysis of sleep disturbance and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. J. Clin. Psychiatry 73, e1160–e1167. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11r07586
Pillai, V., Roth, T., Roehrs, T., Moss, K., Peterson, E. L., and Drake, C. L. (2017). Effectiveness of benzodiazepine receptor agonists in the treatment of insomnia: an examination of response and remission rates. Sleep 40:44. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsw044
Plante, D. T., Goldstein, M. R., Cook, J. D., Smith, R., Riedner, B. A., Rumble, M. E., et al. (2015). Effects of oral temazepam on sleep spindles during non-rapid eye movement sleep: a high-density EEG investigation. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 25, 1600–1610. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.06.005
Plante, D. T., Jensen, J. E., and Winkelman, J. W. (2012). The role of GABA in primary insomnia. Sleep 35, 741–742. doi: 10.5665/sleep.1854
Ramar, K., Malhotra, R. K., Carden, K. A., Martin, J. L., Abbasi-Feinberg, F., Aurora, R. N., et al. (2021). Sleep is essential to health: an american academy of sleep medicine position statement. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 17, 2115–2119. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9476
Ramirez, K., Niraula, A., and Sheridan, J. F. (2016). GABAergic modulation with classical benzodiazepines prevent stress-induced neuro-immune dysregulation and behavioral alterations. Brain Behav. Immun. 51, 154–168. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.08.011
Rashmi, D. Z., John, R., Khandagale, S., and Nadaf, K. (2018). Chapter 13 - γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA): biosynthesis, role, commercial production, and applications. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 57, 413–452. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64057-4.00013-2
Riemann, D., Baglioni, C., Bassetti, C., Bjorvatn, B., Dolenc Groselj, L., Ellis, J. G., et al. (2017). European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia. J. Sleep Res. 26, 675–700. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12594
Riemann, D., Nissen, C., Palagini, L., Otte, A., Perlis, M. L., and Spiegelhalder, K. (2015). The neurobiology, investigation, and treatment of chronic insomnia. Lancet Neurol. 14, 547–558. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00021-6
Riemann, D., Spiegelhalder, K., Feige, B., Voderholzer, U., Berger, M., Perlis, M., et al. (2010). The hyperarousal model of insomnia: a review of the concept and its evidence. Sleep Med. Rev. 14, 19–31. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2009.04.002
Roehrs, T., and Roth, T. (2019). Hyperarousal in insomnia: pre-sleep and diurnal cortisol levels in response to chronic zolpidem treatment. Sleep Med. 61, 52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.04.010
Roehrs, T., Vogel, G., Vogel, F., Wittig, R., Zorick, F., Paxton, C., et al. (1986). Dose effects of temazepam tablets on sleep. Drugs Exp. Clin. Res. 12, 693–699.
Rösner, S., Englbrecht, C., Wehrle, R., Hajak, G., and Soyka, M. (2018). Eszopiclone for insomnia. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 10:Cd010703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010703.pub2
Rudolph, U., and Knoflach, F. (2011). Beyond classical benzodiazepines: novel therapeutic potential of GABAA receptor subtypes. Nat. Rev. Drug Dis. 10, 685–697. doi: 10.1038/nrd3502
Rudolph, U., Crestani, F., Benke, D., Brunig, I., Benson, J. A., Fritschy, J. M., et al. (1999). Benzodiazepine actions mediated by specific gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) receptor subtypes. Nature 401, 796–800. doi: 10.1038/44579
Salas, R. E., Galea, J. M., Gamaldo, A. A., Gamaldo, C. E., Allen, R. P., Smith, M. T., et al. (2014). Increased use-dependent plasticity in chronic insomnia. Sleep 37, 535–544. doi: 10.5665/sleep.3492
Saletu, B., Grünberger, J., and Linzmayer, L. (1983). Quantitative pharmaco-EEG and performance after administration of brotizolam to healthy volunteers. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 16, 333s–345s. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1983.tb02308.x
Salzman, C. (2020). Do benzodiazepines cause Alzheimer’s disease? Am. J. Psychiatry 177, 476–478. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20040375
Sanna, E., Busonero, F., Talani, G., Carta, M., Massa, F., Peis, M., et al. (2002). Comparison of the effects of zaleplon, zolpidem, and triazolam at various GABA(A) receptor subtypes. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 451, 103–110. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(02)02191-x
Sateia, M. J., Buysse, D. J., Krystal, A. D., Neubauer, D. N., and Heald, J. L. (2017). Clinical practice guideline for the pharmacologic treatment of chronic insomnia in adults: an american academy of sleep medicine clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 13, 307–349. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6470
Schifano, F., Chiappini, S., Corkery, J. M., and Guirguis, A. (2019). An insight into z-drug abuse and dependence: an examination of reports to the european medicines agency database of suspected adverse drug reactions. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 22, 270–277. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyz007
Seibt, J., Aton, S. J., Jha, S. K., Coleman, T., Dumoulin, M. C., and Frank, M. G. (2008). The non-benzodiazepine hypnotic zolpidem impairs sleep-dependent cortical plasticity. Sleep 31, 1381–1391.
Seidel, W. F., Cohen, S. A., Bliwise, N. G., Roth, T., and Dement, W. C. (1986). Dose-related effects of triazolam and flurazepam on a circadian rhythm insomnia. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 40, 314–320. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1986.182
Shamim, S. A., Warriach, Z. I., Tariq, M. A., Rana, K. F., and Malik, B. H. (2019). Insomnia: risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases. Cureus 11:e6004. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6004
Sigel, E., and Ernst, M. (2018). The benzodiazepine binding sites of GABAA receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 39, 659–671. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2018.03.006
Silva, A., Collao, A., Orellana, M., Meléndez, J., Caviedes, P., and Cárdenas, A. M. (2003). Zopiclone, but not brotizolam, impairs memory storage during sleep. Neurosci. Res. 47, 241–243. doi: 10.1016/s0168-0102(03)00170-6
Sivertsen, B., Omvik, S., Pallesen, S., Bjorvatn, B., Havik, O. E., Kvale, G., et al. (2006). Cognitive behavioral therapy vs zopiclone for treatment of chronic primary insomnia in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 295, 2851–2858. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.24.2851
Soh, M. S., and Lynch, J. (2015). Selective modulators of α5-containing GABAA receptors and their therapeutic significance. Curr. Drug Targets 16, 735–746.
Study, R. E., and Barker, J. L. (1981). Diazepam and (–)-pentobarbital: fluctuation analysis reveals different mechanisms for potentiation of gamma-aminobutyric acid responses in cultured central neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 7180–7184. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.11.7180
Sun, Y., Lin, C. C., Lu, C. J., Hsu, C. Y., and Kao, C. H. (2016). Association between zolpidem and suicide: a nationwide population-based case-control study. Mayo Clin. Proc. 91, 308–315. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.10.022
Suzuki, H., Yamadera, H., Asayama, K., Kudo, Y., Ito, T., Tamura, Y., et al. (2003). Study of nocturnal sleep and the carryover effects of triazolam and brotizolam using neurophysiological and subjective methods. Neuropsychobiology 47, 158–164. doi: 10.1159/000070586
Takahashi, T., Okajima, Y., Otsubo, T., Shinoda, J., Mimura, M., Nakagome, K., et al. (2003). Comparison of hangover effects among triazolam, flunitrazepam and quazepam in healthy subjects: a preliminary report. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 57, 303–309. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2003.01121.x
Terzano, M. G., Rossi, M., Palomba, V., Smerieri, A., and Parrino, L. (2003). New drugs for insomnia: comparative tolerability of zopiclone, zolpidem and zaleplon. Drug Saf. 26, 261–282.
Tononi, G., and Cirelli, C. (2003). Sleep and synaptic homeostasis: a hypothesis. Brain Res. Bull. 62, 143–150. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2003.09.004
Tononi, G., and Cirelli, C. (2006). Sleep function and synaptic homeostasis. Sleep Med. Rev. 10, 49–62. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2005.05.002
Tononi, G., and Cirelli, C. (2020). Sleep and synaptic down-selection. Eur. J. Neurosci. 51, 413–421. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14335
Turek, F. W., and Losee-Olson, S. (1986). A benzodiazepine used in the treatment of insomnia phase-shifts the mammalian circadian clock. Nature 321, 167–168. doi: 10.1038/321167a0
Uchimura, N., Kamijo, A., Kuwahara, H., Uchiyama, M., Shimizu, T., Chiba, S., et al. (2012). A randomized placebo-controlled polysomnographic study of eszopiclone in Japanese patients with primary insomnia. Sleep Med. 13, 1247–1253. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2012.08.015
Uemura, S. I., Kanbayashi, T., Wakasa, M., Satake, M., Ito, W., Shimizu, K., et al. (2015). Residual effects of zolpidem, triazolam, rilmazafone and placebo in healthy elderly subjects: a randomized double-blind study. Sleep Med. 16, 1395–1402. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.05.021
Van Reenen, C. G., Hopster, H., Van der Werf, J. T., Engel, B., Buist, W. G., Jones, R. B., et al. (2009). The benzodiazepine brotizolam reduces fear in calves exposed to a novel object test. Physiol. Behav. 96, 307–314. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.10.016
van Reeth, O., and Turek, F. W. (1987). Adaptation of circadian rhythmicity to shift in light-dark cycle accelerated by a benzodiazepine. Am. J. Physiol. 253, R204–R207. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1987.253.1.R204
Van Someren, E. J. W. (2021). Brain mechanisms of insomnia: new perspectives on causes and consequences. Physiol. Rev. 101, 995–1046. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00046.2019
Wadworth, A. N., and McTavish, D. (1993). Zopiclone. a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy as an hypnotic. Drugs Aging 3, 441–459. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199303050-00006
Welt, T., Engelmann, M., Renner, U., Erhardt, A., Müller, M. B., Landgraf, R., et al. (2006). Temazepam triggers the release of vasopressin into the rat hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus: novel insight into benzodiazepine action on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical system activity during stress. Neuropsychopharmacology 31, 2573–2579. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301006
Westermeyer, J., and Carr, T. M. (2020). Zolpidem-associated consequences: an updated literature review with case reports. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 208, 28–32. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001074
Wilson, S., Anderson, K., Baldwin, D., Dijk, D. J., Espie, A., Espie, C., et al. (2019). British association for psychopharmacology consensus statement on evidence-based treatment of insomnia, parasomnias and circadian rhythm disorders: an update. J. Psychopharmacol. 33, 923–947. doi: 10.1177/0269881119855343
Winkelman, J. W., Buxton, O. M., Jensen, J. E., Benson, K. L., O’Connor, S. P., Wang, W., et al. (2008). Reduced brain GABA in primary insomnia: preliminary data from 4T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS). Sleep 31, 1499–1506. doi: 10.1093/sleep/31.11.1499
Wong, C. K., Marshall, N. S., Grunstein, R. R., Ho, S. S., Fois, R. A., Hibbs, D. E., et al. (2017). Spontaneous adverse event reports associated with zolpidem in the united states 2003-2012. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 13, 223–234. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6452
Ye, M., and Garcia-Rill, E. (2009). Potentiating effect of eszopiclone on GABA(A) receptor-mediated responses in pedunculopontine neurons. Sleep 32, 879–887. doi: 10.1093/sleep/32.7.879
Yokota, S. I., Horikawa, K., Akiyama, M., Moriya, T., Ebihara, S., Komuro, G., et al. (2000). Inhibitory action of brotizolam on circadian and light-induced per1 and per2 expression in the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus. Br. J. Pharmacol. 131, 1739–1747. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703735
Keywords: insomnia, GABAA receptors, hypnotic benzodiazepines, Z-drugs, sleep processes, brain plasticity, stress system
Citation: Palagini L and Bianchini C (2022) Pharmacotherapeutic management of insomnia and effects on sleep processes, neural plasticity, and brain systems modulating stress: A narrative review. Front. Neurosci. 16:893015. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.893015
Received: 09 March 2022; Accepted: 12 July 2022;
Published: 29 July 2022.
Edited by:
Andrea Romigi, Mediterranean Neurological Institute Neuromed (IRCCS), ItalyReviewed by:
Nato Darchia, Ilia State University, GeorgiaKoji L. Ode, The University of Tokyo, Japan
Copyright © 2022 Palagini and Bianchini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Laura Palagini, bHBhbGFnaW5pQHRpc2NhbGkuaXQ=