Debbie L. C. van den Berg
Julian Ik-Tsen Heng
Alessandro Sessa
Cristina Dias- 1Department of Cell Biology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- 2Remotely Consulting, Perth, WA, Australia
- 3Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- 4Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- 5Neural Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
Editorial on the Research Topic
Transcription and chromatin regulators in neurodevelopmental disorders
Disruptions to key cellular processes during mammalian brain formation such as cell proliferation, lineage-specification and differentiation (Miller et al., 2019) lead to neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) in humans (Ross and Walsh, 2001; Subramanian et al., 2019). Among many signaling mechanisms underlying these processes, the functions of transcription and chromatin regulators of gene expression arguably represent the most prominent (Oproescu et al., 2021; Bölicke and Albert, 2022; Fujita et al., 2022). This topic explores how their defective function leads to NDDs, and how clarifying genotype-phenotype relationships of NDDs facilitates delineation of unique pathological traits.
Reichard and Zimmer-Bensch overview the molecular regulation of brain development, focusing on the role of chromatin modifiers, as well as consequences flowing from their functional impairment. The authors discuss how environmental stressors such as malnutrition or mental/neurophysiological stress during pregnancy triggers epigenetic changes that affect brain and behavior. Along this theme, Sokpor et al. discuss cell delamination during cortical development, an indispensable process for tissue neurogenesis, gliogenesis and tissue growth. The authors discuss how transcription and chromatin regulators mediate cellular detachment from germinal zones of the embryonic cortex, as well as how disruptions to such processes are connected with NDDs.
Overlapping clinical features related to both physical appearance and cognitive function are described across NDDs, yet the mechanistic basis for these shared NDD traits remains poorly understood. Larizza et al. investigate Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (RSTS) and Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein H1 (hnRNPH1)-related syndromic intellectual disability (ID) to describe a putative chromatin and transcriptional regulatory network underpinning shared phenotypes. RSTS is frequently caused by monoallelic pathogenic variants in genes encoding CREB-binding protein (CBP) as well as EP300, homologous lysine acetyltransferases that mediate histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation at enhancers (Hennekam, 2006; Raisner et al., 2018). The authors show that alternative pre-mRNA splicing regulators hnRNPs (including hnRNPH1) are strongly downregulated in RSTS iPSC-derived neurons, and CBP/EP300 could also acetylate hnRNPs to modulate their signaling. Thus, misregulated RNA processing could represent a common underlying mechanism for clinical similarities observed across HNRNPH1-related syndromes and RSTS.
In keeping with Larizza et al.'s hypothesis of converging mechanisms underlying phenotypic similarities in chromatin disorders, Parenti and Kaiser review Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS) as a phenotypic spectrum of transcriptional regulation and chromatin remodeling. CdLS diagnoses are largely attributable to mutations in NIPBL, a gene encoding the cohesin loading factor Nipped-B-like protein (NIPBL) (Tonkin et al., 2004). Functional assays on patient cells show that the underlying mechanism for disease-causing mutations may not lie solely in its sister chromatid cohesion function. Rather, evidence suggests broader roles in transcriptional regulation, RNA polymerase II (RNApol2) interaction and long-range chromatin contacts, collectively relevant to cellular homeostasis and disease. Furthermore, disease-associated variants in BRD4, encoding a histone acetyl lysine “reader” and interactor of NIPBL (Olley et al., 2018), may cause CdLS-like conditions through disruption of NIPBL function. Correspondingly, variants in NIPBL-interacting transcription factors and chromatin regulators are associated with classical CdLS and CdLS-like features that are also shared with other NDDs. Eigenhuis et al. further explore CdLS heterogenous etiology within the context of genes encoding transcriptional pause-release regulators. Notably, TFIID functions as a General Transcription Factor (GTF) in the preinitiation complex (PIC), an essential component for gene transcription, pausing and release (Schier and Taatjes, 2020). Multiple components of its TBP-associated factors (TAFs) interact with the superelongation complex (SEC), including BRD4 and SEC that associate with positive transcription elongation factor-b (P-TEFb) complex, which is then recruited to paused RNApol2, leading to efficient transcription elongation. Mutations to transcriptional pausing regulators cause NDDs with craniofacial and limb anomalies often reminiscent of a CdLS phenotype. A phenotype-to-function hypothesis is presented that reconciles genetic mutations to possible and plausible pausing regulators (including KMT2A and ANKRD11) to defective transcription and cellular dysfunction, leading to disease.
Further exploring chromatin regulators in NDDs reminiscent of CdLS and RSTS, Vasko and Vergano study Coffin-Siris Syndrome (CSS), a condition arising predominantly from mutations to the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. In a large cohort of CSS cases, the authors report mutations in genes encoding SWI/SNF proteins (most commonly ARID1B) and associated transcription factors (SOX11, SOX4), and explore potential genotype-phenotype associations with features including language deficits and adaptive interventions.
Different mutations to a single gene can also precipitate multiple NDDs. Antonyan and Ernst explore how stabilizing and heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in SET binding protein 1 (SETBP1) affect brain development to cause Schinzel-Giedion syndrome (SGS) or SETBP1 deficiency disorder (SDD), respectively. The authors describe how SETBP1 signals through SET which, together with TAF1A and ANP32A, forms the INHAT (inhibitor of acetyltransferase) complex to negatively regulate histone acetyltransferases such as CBP/EP300 (Seo et al., 2001). Other mechanisms, including regulation of AKT signaling, DNA repair, and cell cycle control are also considered.
Rett syndrome (RTT) is a severe neurological condition affecting almost exclusively females and largely caused by mutations in the X-linked gene MECP2 (Lyst and Bird, 2015). The gene encodes methyl-CpG-binding protein 2, an essential gene expression regulator (Tillotson and Bird, 2019) that is abundant in neuronal cells and relevant to their morphology (Shahbazian et al., 2002). Yet, its role in astrocytes remains understudied in RTT (Lioy et al., 2011; Garg et al., 2015). Albizzati et al. address this by quantifying brain astrocyte heterogeneity in an RTT mouse model (Burda and Sofroniew, 2014). They found Mecp2 null astrocytes were morphologically less complex compared to wildtype, and such differences were regionally variable in the brain, particularly within motor and somatosensory cortices. Thus, Mecp2 may mediate astrocyte morphology, possibly through chromatin remodeling in RTT.
In conclusion, these studies collectively illustrate the wide-ranging roles for transcription and chromatin regulators in neurodevelopment. Taken alongside current advancements in gene editing, improved pharmacological interventions that modulate such signaling in cells, as well as innovative functional assays to interpret the impact of causative vs. benign genetic variants; we collectively move closer to the promise of precision diagnoses and personalized treatments for NDDs in humans.
Author contributions
All authors contributed to writing and approved the submitted version.
Funding
CD is supported by the Wellcome Trust (209568/Z/17/Z). AS is supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (GR-2019- 12370949), and Fondazione Regionale per la Ricerca Biomedica (Regione Lombardia), European Joint Programme on Rare Disease Project TREAT-SGS (EJPRD20-008), GA 825575.
Conflict of interest
JH is Founder and Director of Remotely Consulting and did not receive salary for this work.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Bölicke, N., and Albert, M. (2022). Polycomb-mediated gene regulation in human brain development and neurodevelopmental disorders. Dev. Neurobiol. 82, 345–363. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22876
Burda, J. E., and Sofroniew, M. V. (2014). Reactive gliosis and the multicellular response to CNS damage and disease. Neuron 81, 229–248. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.034
Fujita, Y., Pather, S. R., Ming, G. L., and Song, H. (2022). 3D spatial genome organization in the nervous system: From development and plasticity to disease. Neuron. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.06.004 [Epub ahead of print].
Garg, S. K., Lioy, D. T., Knopp, S. J., and Bissonnette, J. M. (2015). Conditional depletion of methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 in astrocytes depresses the hypercapnic ventilatory response in mice. J. Appl. Physiol. 119, 670–676. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00411.2015
Hennekam, R. C. M. (2006). Rubinstein–Taybi syndrome. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 14, 981–985. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201594
Lioy, D. T., Garg, S. K., Monaghan, C. E., Raber, J., Foust, K. D., Kaspar, B. K., et al. (2011). A role for glia in the progression of Rett's syndrome. Nature 475, 497–500. doi: 10.1038/nature10214
Lyst, M. J., and Bird, A. (2015). Rett syndrome: a complex disorder with simple roots. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 261–275. doi: 10.1038/nrg3897
Miller, D. J., Bhaduri, A., Sestan, N., and Kriegstein, A. (2019). Shared and derived features of cellular diversity in the human cerebral cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 56, 117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2018.12.005
Olley, G., Ansari, M., Bengani, H., Grimes, G. R., Rhodes, J., Von Kriegsheim, A., et al. (2018). BRD4 interacts with NIPBL and BRD4 is mutated in a Cornelia de Lange-like syndrome. Nat. Genet. 50, 329–332. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0042-y
Oproescu, A. M., Han, S., and Schuurmans, C. (2021). New insights into the intricacies of proneural gene regulation in the embryonic and adult cerebral cortex. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 14, 642016. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2021.642016
Raisner, R., Kharbanda, S., Jin, L., Jeng, E., Chan, E., Merchant, M., et al. (2018). Enhancer activity requires CBP/P300 bromodomain-dependent histone H3K27 acetylation. Cell Rep. 24, 1722–1729. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.041
Ross, M. E., and Walsh, C. A. (2001). Human brain malformations and their lessons for neuronal migration. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 1041–1070. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1041
Schier, A. C., and Taatjes, D. J. (2020). Structure and mechanism of the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery. Genes Dev. 34, 465–488. doi: 10.1101/gad.335679.119
Seo, S.-B., Mcnamara, P., Heo, S., Turner, A., Lane, W. S., and Chakravarti, D. (2001). Regulation of histone acetylation and transcription by INHAT, a human cellular complex containing the set oncoprotein. Cell 104, 119–130. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00196-9
Shahbazian, M. D., Antalffy, B., Armstrong, D. L., and Zoghbi, H. Y. (2002). Insight into Rett syndrome: MeCP2 levels display tissue- and cell-specific differences and correlate with neuronal maturation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 115–124. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.2.115
Subramanian, L., Calcagnotto, M. E., and Paredes, M. F. (2019). Cortical malformations: lessons in human brain development. Front. Cell Neurosci. 13, 576. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00576
Tillotson, R., and Bird, A. (2019). The molecular basis of MeCP2 function in the brain. J. Mol. Biol. 432, 1602–1623. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.10.004
Keywords: neurodevelopmental disorders, chromatin, gene regulation, differentiation, brain, neurodevelopment, transcription
Citation: van den Berg DLC, Heng JI-T, Sessa A and Dias C (2022) Editorial: Transcription and chromatin regulators in neurodevelopmental disorders. Front. Neurosci. 16:1023580. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1023580
Received: 19 August 2022; Accepted: 23 August 2022;
Published: 16 September 2022.
Edited and reviewed by: Kazuhiko Sawada, Tsukuba International University, Japan
Copyright © 2022 van den Berg, Heng, Sessa and Dias. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Debbie L. C. van den Berg, d.vandenberg@erasmusmc.nl; Julian Ik-Tsen Heng, remotelyconsulting@gmail.com; Alessandro Sessa, sessa.alessandro@hsr.it; Cristina Dias, cristina.dias@kcl.ac.uk