Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neuroimaging, 10 January 2024
Sec. Clinical Neuroimaging

Regional associations of white matter integrity and neurological, post-traumatic stress disorder and autonomic symptoms in Veterans with and without history of loss of consciousness in mild TBI

\r\nAbigail B. Waters,
Abigail B. Waters1,2*Sarah A. Bottari,Sarah A. Bottari2,3Laura C. Jones,Laura C. Jones2,3Damon G. Lamb,Damon G. Lamb1,3Gregory F. LewisGregory F. Lewis4John B. Williamson,,
John B. Williamson1,2,3*
  • 1Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, North Florida/South Georgia VAMC, Gainesville, FL, United States
  • 2Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
  • 3Department of Psychiatry, Center for OCD and Anxiety Related Disorders, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
  • 4Socioneural Physiology Lab, Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States

Background: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) share overlapping symptom presentations and are highly comorbid conditions among Veteran populations. Despite elevated presentations of PTSD after mTBI, mechanisms linking the two are unclear, although both have been associated with alterations in white matter and disruptions in autonomic regulation. The present study aimed to determine if there is regional variability in white matter correlates of symptom severity and autonomic functioning in a mixed sample of Veterans with and without PTSD and/or mTBI (N = 77).

Methods: Diffusion-weighted images were processed to extract fractional anisotropy (FA) values for major white matter structures. The PTSD Checklist-Military version (PCL-M) and Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) were used to determine symptom domains within PTSD and mTBI. Autonomic function was assessed using continuous blood pressure and respiratory sinus arrythmia during a static, standing angle positional test. Mixed-effect models were used to assess the regional specificity of associations between symptom severity and white matter, with FA, global symptom severity (score), and white matter tract (tract) as predictors. Additional interaction terms of symptom domain (i.e., NSI and PCL-M subscales) and loss of consciousness (LoC) were added to evaluate potential moderating effects. A parallel analysis was conducted to explore concordance with autonomic functioning.

Results: Results from the two-way Score × Tract interaction suggested that global symptom severity was associated with FA in the cingulum angular bundle (positive) and uncinate fasciculus (negative) only, without variability by symptom domain. We also found regional specificity in the relationship between FA and autonomic function, such that FA was positively associated with autonomic function in all tracts except the cingulum angular bundle. History of LoC moderated the association for both global symptom severity and autonomic function.

Conclusions: Our findings are consistent with previous literature suggesting that there is significant overlap in the symptom presentation in TBI and PTSD, and white matter variability associated with LoC in mTBI may be associated with increased PTSD-spectra symptoms. Further research on treatment response in patients with both mTBI history and PTSD incorporating imaging and autonomic assessment may be valuable in understanding the role of brain injury in treatment outcomes and inform treatment design.

1 Introduction

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) are heterogenous disorders with overlapping symptoms that are overrepresented in active-duty military and Veteran populations. According to the 2008 Rand Report, comorbid PTSD and TBI were seen at a rate of 7%−76% in military members returning from Iraq and Afghanistan (Tanielian et al., 2008), and those with a TBI were three times more likely to be diagnosed with PTSD (Carlson et al., 2011). These conditions are associated with similar symptoms such as memory impairment (Dolan et al., 2012), sleep disturbance/fatigue (Gilbert et al., 2015), emotional lability (O'Neil et al., 2017), depressed mood (Isaac et al., 2015), increased substance use (Miles et al., 2015), and suicidal ideation (Bahraini et al., 2013). Additionally, the triad of depression, history of military mild TBI (mTBI), and PTSD is associated with greater functional disability and unemployment (Lippa et al., 2015; Amick et al., 2018). There are pathophysiological similarities in mTBI and PTSD in that they are both linked to neuroinflammatory, excitotoxic, and oxidative processes that are associated with white matter changes in the brain (Kaplan et al., 2018). With such symptom convergence, similar pathophysiology, and high co-occurrence, it is challenging to disentangle effects of TBI and PTSD and further whether and how TBI contributes to the expression of PTSD. Mechanisms underlying interactions in these conditions remain unclear.

Factor analyses of self-reported symptoms in TBI and PTSD have underscored the difficulty in dissociating effects of co-morbid conditions. The Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI; Cicerone and Kalmar, 1995), a self-report measure of post-concussive symptoms, has been found to assess four underlying symptom constructs (i.e., affective, cognitive, somatosensory, and vestibular), based off best fit models from a sample of National Guard members and Veterans with and without history of mTBI and TBI (all severities), respectively, even when controlling for PTSD (Benge et al., 2009; Vanderploeg et al., 2015). However, correlations between post-concussive symptoms and PTSD symptoms (i.e., re-experiencing, avoidance, hyperarousal, and negative alterations in cognition or mood) are high, possibly due to both overlapping pathophysiology and item characteristics as −15% of items have direct crosswalks to items on common PTSD self-report measures (O'Neil et al., 2021; Scimeca et al., 2021). Furthermore, military service members diagnosed with both PTSD and TBI tend to have greater PTSD symptom severity and higher rates of disability in comparison to those with PTSD only (Lippa et al., 2015). The overlap in symptom presentation and heightened severity of PTSD is possibly due, in part, to commonly affected brain networks in TBI that may contribute to similar symptoms to PTSD as well to increased expression of symptoms of PTSD.

In mild-to-moderate TBI, the observed variability in white matter is likely due to some combination of both premorbid vulnerability and secondary injuries, as direct, primary injuries (e.g., hemorrhage) are relatively less common (Blennow et al., 2012). However, diffuse axonal injury (DAI) via shearing injury is still possible in this population. Notably, frontolimbic pathways responsible for executive functioning and emotion regulation are some of the most vulnerable areas for damage (Wright et al., 2017; Badea et al., 2018; Kulkarni et al., 2019). Following injury, a multi-faceted neurometabolic cascade (i.e., secondary injuries) occurs in which there is a depolarization of the neuron followed by dysregulated glutamate release, thereby triggering a surge in energy demand and a temporary metabolic crisis, contributing to further axonal damage (Giza and Hovda, 2014); this is detectable in blood, even in mTBI (Wang et al., 2021). This is the proposed substrate for acute post-mTBI symptoms with other factors such as age, history of prior concussion, and comorbid neurological and psychiatric conditions moderating recovery (Bonfield et al., 2013; Karr et al., 2014).

While PTSD is thought to be a predominately psychiatric condition, there have been reports of white matter alteration in PTSD, although the mechanisms for these changes are not fully understood. In recently deployed military service members, reduced fractional anisotropy (FA; the most common diffusion-based indicator of underlying white matter structure) of frontolimbic white matter tracts (e.g., the uncinate fasciculus) was associated with startle and subthreshold PTSD symptomology (Costanzo et al., 2016). Further, in a study comparing civilians and Veterans with mTBI, Davenport et al. (2016) found that environment in which mTBI occurred was not determinant of weaker FA connections but that lifetime history of PTSD significantly interacted with deployment mTBI. Contrasting these findings, numerous diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) studies of people with comorbid PTSD and TBI found no or little difference among common DWI metrics, Bazarian et al. (2013), Petrie et al. (2014), Lopez et al. (2017), Yeh et al. (2017), Bolzenius et al. (2018), and Santhanam et al. (2019), inconsistent significant regions of interest (ROI), and little evidence tying an association between DWI measures and PTSD with either small effect size or low predictive variance (Bazarian et al., 2013; Lepage et al., 2018). However, it is widely acknowledged in the literature that the high cooccurrence of PTSD and mTBI can exacerbate one another both neurophysiologically and symptomatically, but the mechanisms are not yet fully understood (Daniels et al., 2013; Davenport et al., 2016; O'Doherty et al., 2018; Santhanam et al., 2019).

Studies investigating the neurobehavioral outcomes following mTBI have consistently found that the presence of comorbid PTSD is linked to poorer results on a range of assessments, including self-reports of emotional regulation and global functioning (e.g., social engagement, disability) (Pietrzak et al., 2009; Macera et al., 2012; MacDonald et al., 2014; Combs et al., 2015; Haagsma et al., 2015; Jackson et al., 2016). Following TBI, dysfunction within fronto-limbic pathways may impact the ability to inhibit down-up neurophysiological reactivity (i.e., fight-flight, behavioral immobilization) expressed in PTSD (Williamson et al., 2013). This failure of inhibition may lead to disruptions in autonomic systems (Shah et al., 2013), increasing the effects of chronic stress on overall health and daily functioning. Autonomic dysregulation is a core feature of PTSD, criterion D. Hyperarousal symptoms are characterized by increased restlessness, startle response/stressor reactivity, and decreased sleep quality. Chronic hyperarousal is associated with accelerated physiological aging as evidenced by increased DNA methylation (Wolf et al., 2016). While criterion D is typically assessed with self-report, objective autonomic measures are different in patients with PTSD. High frequency heart rate variability, an index of vagal contributions to interbeat variability of the heart, is lower in patients with PTSD (Schneider and Schwerdtfeger, 2020), and, furthermore, responsive to successful treatment with psychotherapy (Shah et al., 2013). High frequency heart rate variability is associated with a variety of health outcomes; lower heart rate variability is associated with metabolic risk (Wulsin et al., 2015), pulmonary disease (Alqahtani et al., 2023), cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality (Jarczok et al., 2022). Parasympathetic control is also a critical system in inhibiting sympathetic nervous system response to stress, aka the vagal brake (Porges, 2001; Thayer and Lane, 2009). Frontally mediated networks of critical in autonomic control (Beissner et al., 2013) and disruption in key fronto-limbic white matter pathways may bias autonomic mobilization toward a maladaptive response to stressors; i.e., disrupting this system may be a critical factor in the amplification of PTSD symptoms associated with TBI. Understanding the relationship between symptom severity, autonomic functioning, and symptoms domains in fronto-limbic pathways will help to identify potential treatment targets when dissociating the effects of potentially interacting conditions.

The primary aim of this study was to determine if there was regional variability in the relationship between white matter integrity in major tracts and symptom severity in a mixed sample of Veterans with PTSD and/or mTBI (i.e., are some white matter tracts more closely associated with symptom severity in PTSD and mTBI compared to other white matter tracts?). We assessed symptom severity as a global construct, as well as the potential moderating effect of symptom domain (e.g., trauma-related re-experiencing, post-concussive vestibular complaints) and initial injury severity [i.e., loss of consciousness (LoC) following TBI]. A secondary aim of this study was to contrast analyses of symptom severity with objective measures of autonomic functioning [i.e., respiratory sinus arrythmia (RSA) and baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS)], in order to explore potentially overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms in PTSD and TBI. Examining the discriminant associations between tracts, autonomic functioning, and symptom severity in PTSD and TBI will provide a better understanding of the relationship between these two, often overlapping, conditions.

2 Methods

2.1 Participants

One-hundred and forty Veterans were screened for participation. Ninety-four Veterans who were previously deployed on active duty to a theater of combat operations were recruited from the North Florida/South Georgia Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and surrounding community. Eleven participants were excluded after enrollment and 6 individuals did not complete the MRI; 77 Veterans were included in the final analysis. Our sample consisted of 70 men and 7 women, age ranged from 23 to 45 years in age (M = 32.14 years, SD = 6.38), with an average of 14.34 years of education (SD = 1.95; see Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Two group demographic table.

Veterans included those with and without history of TBI, with and without history of PTSD, and neither. mTBI diagnosis was determined according to VA/DOD diagnostic guidelines using the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method- Short Form (Corrigan and Bogner, 2007). Participants were also assessed for PTSD symptoms and coded as having a PTSD diagnosis if the Veteran (1) reported experience of a Criterion A traumatic event on a structured clinical interview designed for this study, and (2) endorsed current symptoms meeting DSM-IV diagnostic criteria on the PTSD Checklist- Military version (PCL-M; Weathers et al., 1993). Participants' self-report was verified via review of the VA Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS) and military service medical records, when available. A diagnostic consensus conference with a licensed clinical psychologist and neuroscientist was used to verify each participant's diagnostic group.

Moderator analyses were completed to examine the impact of LoC in mTBI, as a proxy variable for injury severity. All individuals in the “LoC” group were by definition mTBI subjects. The “no LoC” group included a mix of participants with mTBI (but without LoC) and without any reported mTBI. This grouping variable was chosen for two reasons. First, although individuals with and without LOC meet VA/DOD diagnostic guidelines for mTBI, duration of LoC is a commonly accepted marker of injury severity. Using LoC as a categorical grouping allowed us to probe the heterogeneity within mTBI. Due to sample size, we were unable to fully parse the differences between mTBI with and without LoC. Second, in this population of Veterans with combat exposure and mTBI and/or PTSD, retrospective reports of alterations of consciousness (e.g., feeling “dazed”) can be easily conflated with acute stress responses. The presence of LoC reflects a “confirmed” mTBI, as opposed to ambiguous or absent mTBI in the “no LoC” group. Exclusion criteria were: neurological disorders other than TBI, major medical conditions, severe psychiatric conditions other than PTSD and likely unrelated to trauma (e.g., schizophrenia), premorbid (to trauma) sleep disorders, self-report of current substance abuse (within the past 2 weeks for marijuana or alcohol and within the past 2 months for other substances), current prescription for medications that influence autonomic activity (e.g., beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors), pregnancy, and any contraindications to MRI scanning. All study procedures were approved by the University of Florida Institutional Review Board. Participants provided written informed consent and were compensated for their time and travel.

Note, these data analyzed in the present manuscript are from an existing dataset that includes multimodal neuroimaging, autonomic and neurobehavioral metrics. There are prior publications with portions of this sample (Lamb et al., 2017; Bottari et al., 2021; Rieke et al., 2021).

2.2 Measures

2.2.1 PTSD checklist-military version

Participants self-reported PTSD symptom severity using the PTSD checklist- military version (PCL-m; Weathers et al., 1993). Total symptom severity scores were obtained by summing participants' responses across each of the 17 items. Total symptom severity scores can range from 17 to 85 with higher scores indicating greater PTSD symptom severity. Subscores were also calculated for each DSM-IV PTSD symptom cluster by summing items on the PCL-m relating to re-experiencing (items 1–5), avoidance (items 6–12), and hyperarousal (items 13–17) (Williams et al., 2011).

2.2.2 Neurobehavioral symptom inventory

Participants self-reported on post-concussive symptom severity using the 22-item neurobehavioral symptom inventory (NSI; Cicerone and Kalmar, 1995). Subscores were calculated for each NSI factor (vestibular, somatic, cognitive, and affective) based on the four-factor, 20-item NSI model that achieved the best fit as described in Vanderploeg et al. (2015). This model excludes two items (hearing problems and appetite disturbance) due to poor fit. Higher scores on each subscale are indicative of greater post-concussive symptom severity.

2.2.3 Neuroimaging

All participants underwent scanning with a 3-t Philips achieva MRI. t1-weighted, t2-weighted, 3d fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), t2*-weighted echo planar, and high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) sequences were acquired. The diffusion gradients were applied along 6 directions with a b-value of 100 s/mm2 and along 64 non-collinear directions using a b-value of 1000 s/mm2. One image was acquired with diffusion weighting (b = 0).

Anatomical reconstruction was performed on each participant's T1-weighted image using FreeSurfer software to obtain a cortical parcellation and subcortical segmentation for each participant (Fischl, 2012). Diffusion tractography was performed using FreeSurfer's (v6.0) TRActs Constrained by UnderLying Anatomy (TRACULA) tool, which provides an automated probabilistic reconstruction of white matter pathways from each participant's DWI data (Yendiki et al., 2011). This approach has a number of advantages including (1) the use of a probabilistic ball-and-stick model of tractography allows for the modeling of the white matter tract in areas of high local uncertainty (e.g., crossing fibers, low anisotropy), (2) the reconstruction is completed in each subject's native space to reduce estimation errors and (3) characterizes significant variability over the length of the white matter tract, reducing the likelihood of spurious findings. During pre-processing, data were corrected for head motion-related artifacts and image distortion due to eddy currents using eddy_correct in the FSL (v6.0) toolbox (https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki). In addition, data were visually inspected before and after processing and no apparent issues with motion-related artifacts were identified. The DTI parameter FA was calculated using dtifit tools in FSL. The average FA for the center of each major white matter tract was used for statistical analysis to avoid non-white matter tissue partial volume effects (Alexander et al., 2001; Roine et al., 2014). Analyses included inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), uncinate fasciculus (UNC), anterior thalamic radiations (ATR), cingulum-cingulate gyrus (supracallosal) bundle (CCG), cingulum-angular (infracallosal) bundle (CAB), superior longitudinal fasciculus-parietal bundle (SLFP), superior longitudinal fasciculus-temporal bundle (SLFT), forceps major (Fmajor), and forceps minor (Fminor).

2.2.4 Autonomic functioning

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) was calculated from data collected during a posturally-modulated (standing to laying face up at an angle) autonomic assessment using a tilt table. Heart variability statistics were derived using the Porges–Bohrer method (Lewis et al., 2012) using customized software (Brain-Body Center, 2007; Brain-Body Center for Psychophysiology and Bioengineering, 2016). Heart rate, recorded with a 3-lead electrocardiogram, and continuous arterial blood pressure were collected for 3 min in each position-−90° (standing/upright), 60°, 30°, 60°, and 90°–with slow transitions in between (~2°s/s). The primary metric used in analysis was the difference in RSA from 30° tilt to the second 90° tilt (returned to upright), as this represents the largest positional shift from supine. A difference score for baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) was calculated using the same method, for a subset of individuals (n = 37).

2.3 Statistical analysis

2.3.1 Pre-analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to report participant demographics and scores for symptom scales (i.e., PCL-m and NSI). PCL-m and NSI scores were z-scaled within this sample, with more positive scores representing more severe reported symptoms. The average FA for each tract was z-scaled within tract, with more positive scores representing increased FA.

2.3.2 Mixed-effects modeling

Statistical analysis was conducted in r 4.1.2, modeled on the approach used by Mace et al. (2019). Mixed effects models were conducted with the lme4 package (Bates et al., 2015). Mixed-effects models have a number of advantages over traditional linear regression (Baayen et al., 2008), and are ideal for high-dimensional neuroimaging data with multiple measurements per subject (e.g., FA for each tract). Values from each participant can be imputed with no prior aggregation; thus, both by-item and by-participant variation are accounted for in a single model (Winter, 2013) through both fixed and random effects. Mixed-effects modeling allowed us to simultaneously quantify which tracts were most related to both total symptom severity and specific sub-domains of symptomatology. Principal components analysis (Varimax rotation) of NSI and PCL-m subscales, in addition to prior literature (Hoover et al., 2022), provided support for testing global symptom severity via mixed-effects models (KMO = 0.86; Bartlett's test, p < 0.001; standardized factor loadings 0.72–0.93; variance explained 74.0%).

Linear mixed-effects models included symptom subscales on the NSI and PCL-M (Domain; factor, 7 levels), symptom severity scores agnostic to domain (Score; continuous), white matter tract (Tract; factor, 9 levels), and LoC (factor, 2 levels), as predictors of tract FA (continuous criterion). Random intercepts were included for inter-subject and hemispheric variability. Age and sex were entered as covariates of non-interest. Akaike information criterion (AIC) and F-tests of the variance ratio were compared between nested models. The Score × Tract interaction was used to assess the regional specificity of associations between global symptom severity and white matter. The Score × Tract × Domain interaction was used to determine if the Score × Tract relationship varied by symptom subscales, which aids in differentiating between PTSD and TBI pathophysiology. The Score × Tract × LoC interaction examined whether there was a moderating effect of TBI. A planned, parallel analysis was conducted with measures of autonomic function (RSA; continuous), testing the RSA × Tract × LoC interactions. An exploratory analysis with BRS (continuous) was also conducted to parallel the model used with RSA. Predicted marginal means (i.e., slopes) for the relationship between FA and predictors were estimated with the lsmeans, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) generated using 1000 bootstrapped samples, in order to more comprehensively quantify the strength and reliability of findings.

3 Results

3.1 Pre-analysis

In our study of Veterans who had been deployed in combat, we observed a wide spectrum of symptoms related to PTSD and a history of mTBI. We divided the sample into those with and without a history of LoC. Demographic characteristics of our sample were largely representative of the local veteran population, which is predominantly White, male, and has some college education on average. Groups (LoC vs. no LoC) differed on age (W = 539.5, p = 0.0497), number of TBIs (W = 423.5, p = 0.0012), alteration of consciousness (AoC) (p < 0.001), and PTSD diagnosis (x2 = 5.62, p = 0.018) (see Table 1). Those with history of LoC had an average raw NSI score of 31.9 (SD = 20.8) compared to 14.2 (SD = 12.6) for those without LoC. History of LoC was positively and strongly associated (p < 0.001) with total scores and all domains of the PCL-M and NSI, except for the Cognitive domain of the NSI (p < 0.01) (see Supplementary Table 1). On the PCL-M, a similar pattern was seen with those with history of LoC having a higher average raw score (M = 49.4, SD = 18.8) than those without (M = 31.7, SD = 13.4). Correlations between symptom subscales were high, ranging from 0.54 to 0.94, with all reaching significance (see Table 2). There were no significant correlations between RSA Difference Score and the PCL-M and NSI (p > 0.05) (see Table 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Descriptive statistics and correlations for PCLM and NSI.

3.2 Mixed effects modeling

3.2.1 Predictors of global FA

Mixed effects modeling of single predictors (see Table 3) suggested that that there was no relationship between global FA and global symptom severity [score; F(1, 8192) = 0.00, p = 0.950], injury severity characteristics [LoC; F(1, 71) = 2.35, p = 0.130], or autonomic functions [BRS, F(1, 33) = 2.50, p = 0.123; RSA, F(1, 58) = 1.40, p = 0.242]. FA also did not significantly vary between tracts [F(8, 1999) = 0.00, p > 0.999], as would be expected following z-scaling. A post-hoc analysis examining the raw FA values demonstrated some variability between tracts, with the CAB having the lowest average FA and the FMajor having the highest (see Supplementary Table 2).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Results from mixed effects models including main effects and interactions.

3.2.2 Tract specificity for global symptom burden and autonomic burden

Results from mixed effects modeling of two-way score × tract interaction (see Table 3) suggested that there was regional specificity in the relationship between FA and global symptom severity [F(8, 5071) = 6.41, p < 0.001]. Bootstrapped estimates of slopes (see Table 4) revealed that the global symptom severity was significantly associated with FA in 2 tracts. For every 1 SD increase in global symptom severity there was a 0.07 SD increase in FA within the CAB (95% CI [0.01, 0.12]) and a 0.09 SD decrease in FA within the UNC (95% CI [−0.05, −0.13]). However, the addition of symptom subscale (score × tract × domain interaction) did not improve overall model fit, suggesting that the effects seen in the UNC and CAB did not vary by symptom domain (TBI vs. PTSD).

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Bootstrapped (B = 1,000) slope estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from the two-way Score × Tract and RSA × Tract interactions.

Results from the RSA × Tract interaction (see Table 3) also suggested there was regional specificity in the relationship between FA and autonomic function [F(8, 1602) = 16.06, p < 0.001; see Figure 1]. Bootstrapped estimates of the slopes (see Table 4), revealed that RSA was positively associated with FA in all tracts, except the CAB (95% CI [−0.04, 0.07]). For significant tracts, the estimated slopes ranged from 0.06 to 0.28, with the strongest relationships observed in the ATR (95% CI [0.25, 0.30]) and the UNC (95% CI [0.16, 0.22]). A similar pattern was seen for the exploratory BRS × Tract interaction [F(8, 967) = 16.18, p < 0.001], despite the reduced sample size, with positive relationships between FA and BRS in all tracts, except the CAB (95% CI [−0.07, 0.08]).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The relationship between FA and RSA (z-standardized scores), separated by white matter tract for the full sample.

3.2.3 Moderating effect of TBI with LoC

The moderating effect of LoC in TBI was estimated using two, three-way interaction terms in parallel models: Score × Tract × LoC and RSA × Tract × LoC. Results (see Table 3) suggested that LoC moderated the association for both global symptom severity [F(8, 5862) = 6.31, p < 0.001] and RSA [F(8, 1595) = 3.51, p < 0.001].

Bootstrapped estimates of slopes suggested that, for individuals without LoC, there was no significant relationship between FA and Score across tracts. For individuals with LoC, there was a significant relationship between FA and global symptom severity in 4 tracts (see Figure 2 [Interaction Line plots]). For every 1 SD increase in global symptom severity, there was a 0.10 and 0.08 decrease in SD of FA of the UNC (95% CI [−0.05, −0.17]) and ATR (95% CI [−0.03, −0.13]) respectively, but a 0.13 increase in both the CAB (95% CI [0.05, 0.20]) and Forceps Minor (95% CI [0.06, 0.19]).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The relationship between FA and global symptom score (z-standardized scores), for select white matter tracts, separated by group (LoC vs. no LoC).

Regarding autonomic functioning, for individuals with LoC, bootstrapped estimates of slopes mirrored the findings from the two-way interaction; RSA was positively associated with FA in all tracts, with the weakest relationship observed in the CAB (95% CI [0.01, 0.11]) and the strongest relationships in the ATR (95% CI [0.30, 0.35]) and the UNC (95% CI [0.17, 0.23]). For individuals without LoC, there was a weaker, but still significant, positive relationship in the ATR, SLFP, and UNC only, with slopes ranging from 0.02 to 0.16. The relationship between RSA and both interhemispheric pathways (FMajor and FMinor) was not meaningfully different between those with and without LoC. There was a significant negative relationship between FA and RSA in the CCG (95% CI [−0.07, −0.21]) [see Figure 3 (Visualization of bootstrapped CIs, grouped by LoC and no LoC for the RSA × Tract × LoC interaction)]. For the exploratory analysis with BRS, the results remained consistent in the limbic pathways (ATR, UNC, and CCG), despite the reduced sample size.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The relationship between FA and RSA (z-standardized scores), separated by white matter tract and group (LoC vs. no LoC).

4 Discussion

This study demonstrated regional specificity in the relationship between white matter integrity and global symptom severity, as well as between white matter and autonomic functioning in combat exposed Veterans with and without history of mild TBI and PTSD. These relationships were further moderated by LoC in those with mTBI, suggesting that injury severity during TBI may interact with chronic stress via impact on critical structures in regulating stress (although causality cannot be determined by this study). Consistent with the growing body of literature surrounding symptom typology in PTSD and TBI, our findings did not suggest that symptom domain (i.e., NSI vs. PCL-M) explained additional variance in white matter. These findings may have important implications for the clinical management of PTSD and TBI in Veterans.

Across the full sample, global symptom severity was positively associated with FA in the CAB and negatively associated with FA in the UNC. It is possible that the positive association between symptom severity and FA in the CAB reflects the loss of a sub-section crossing fibers (Bazarian et al., 2007), resulting in a paradoxical increase in FA as white matter degrades. Within the ventro-limbic system of the brain, the CAB and UNC are two pathways implicated in emotional regulation, memory, and autonomic feedback, that may play a role in the maintenance of symptoms (Williamson et al., 2013; Averill et al., 2018; Bottari et al., 2021). However, it is important to note that there did not appear to be regional specificity for symptom domain. This is consistent with previous literature suggesting that “post-concussive” symptoms are not specific to mild TBI (Lagarde et al., 2014; Santhanam et al., 2019) and that PTSD and mild TBI may share common pathophysiological mechanisms (Kaplan et al., 2018), underscoring the difficulty in symptom attribution. Mild TBI, particularly with LoC, may interact with the expression of symptoms of PTSD. Thus, comprehensive assessment and treatment of TBI, particularly in Veteran populations, should include assessment of PTSD.

There was also a strong positive relationship between FA and RSA and BRS difference scores (supine 30° minus standing 90°), in all tracts but the CAB, across the full sample. It is typical for RSA and BRS to increase in the supine position compared with standing (90°), reflecting greater parasympathetic control (Lellamo et al., 1996; Laude et al., 2004). In our sample, lower values of FA in a key fronto-limbic pathway (the UNC), were associated with an abnormal autonomic response (lower RSA and BRS in the supine position). Increased BRS, as a measure of autonomic functioning, is associated with dampening of the locus-coeruleus-noradrenergic pathway, as would be expected in a relaxed state (e.g., when lying down). Dysfunction in this pathway is critical in the neurophysiology of anxiety related disorders. The locus-coeruleus projects to the basolateral amygdala, an important structure in the expression of PTSD and is within the same circuit regulated by prefrontal cortical-limbic projections (Daviu et al., 2019). Our findings suggest that this autonomic dysfunction is associated with reduced FA, possibly reflecting the effects of chronic stress on the brain due to poor management of allostatic load within the autonomic system. While the exact mechanisms underlying the relationship between white matter changes and chronic stress remain unclear, animal models suggest that chronic stress may alter the expression of genes responsible for pre-programmed cell death in oligodendrocytes due to changing cellular energy demands (Antontseva et al., 2020). Longitudinal investigations of the interaction between autonomic function and variability in white matter after TBI are necessary to draw conclusions about potential directionality and identify possible treatment targets. Increased stress after TBI may exacerbate physiological effects of injury with increased blood brain barrier permeability, amplified autonomic response to stressors, and poor sleep which may prolong recovery or perhaps increase the likelihood of chronic symptom presentation. It has been previously demonstrated that indicators of reduced autonomic function prior to exposure to a criterion A event (e.g., combat environments) are predictive of development of PTSD (Minassian et al., 2015).

It is notable that the strongest relationships between FA and stress measures (i.e., both global symptom severity and RSA/BRS difference scores) were found in the ATR and UNC across the full sample. Connecting orbitofrontal cortex to anterior temporal lobes, the UNC is particularly vulnerable to shearing injuries in TBI (Seo et al., 2012), and has been identified as a potential treatment target for deep brain stimulation treatment of PTSD (Hamani et al., 2022). The ATR, part of the anterior limb of the internal capsule, connects dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to the thalamus. Reduced white matter integrity within the fronto-subcortical pathways (ATR and UNC) may impair the ability to regulate emotional and autonomic functions (disinhibition of the amygdala), leading to increased overall stress burden (Williamson et al., 2013). Furthermore, the association between FA in the ATR/UNC and stress measures was strengthened in individuals with LoC in TBI, suggests that severity of TBI (LoC, compared with AoC) has an effect, as postulated by Williamson et al., 2013. Our findings underscore the importance of these limbic pathways in understanding the mechanisms underlying possible interactions between PTSD and TBI. Addressing this interaction with differential approaches to treatment is an important area of future research.

There also appeared to be a dissociation between stress measures and FA in the CAB. Global symptom severity was positively associated with FA in the CAB (possibly related to the loss of crossing fibers) in the LoC group and negatively associated with FA in the group without LoC. In contrast, there was no relationship between the CAB and autonomic functioning across both groups. This may reflect the relatively smaller role that parahippocampal cingulate projections play in autonomic regulation, despite their importance in maintenance of anxiety-avoidance learning, although the differing contributions of subdivisions within the cingulum remain unclear (Jones et al., 2013; Bubb et al., 2018).

The findings in the FMinor, the major interhemispheric connection between the frontal lobes, are more difficult to interpret. While the relationship between FA in the FMinor was significant in the group with LoC across both stress measures, the direction of effects is in contrast to the pattern observed in the UNC and CAB; higher values of FA were associated with both higher global symptom severity and more positive RSA/BRS difference scores (i.e., higher RSA/BRS during the 30° position). This is counter intuitive. On the one hand, it makes sense that higher FA is associated with normalized autonomic responses between standing and supine positions. On the other hand, greater severity of global symptoms is not consistent with this interpretation. It is possible that these findings represent different portions of variance across tracts and stress measures, reflecting heterogeneity in the manifestation of anxiety symptoms and non-emotional elements of autonomic control. However, this may reflect reduced interhemispheric coordination of frontal-limbic and autonomic regions (Xavier et al., 2018), and further research is needed to fully explore this possibility.

There are several important limitations to consider. Our sample is predominantly male, reflecting the demographics of the Veteran population in combat roles during the conflicts experienced by our cohort. Therefore, our findings may have limited generalizability for other populations, particularly for women with co-occurring TBI and PTSD, as is commonly seen in the context of inter-personal violence. This population is understudied and represents an important target of future research. An additional limitation is in our method for categorizing participants in mTBI and PTSD diagnostic groups. While the PCL-M has demonstrated high levels of diagnostic sensitivity, we did not use the gold-standard CAPS interview to assess for PTSD symptomatology due to time constraints, instead using a custom interview to establish criterion A occurrence. Similarly, while the OSU-TBI Identification method has been shown to have strong validity and reliability, there are many challenges to accurately diagnosing TBI using retrospective self-report particularly in military samples (Davenport et al., 2016). This issue is also true in civilian contexts as many people who experience mild TBI do not seek treatment. Third, like most studies of TBI and PTSD in humans, we have limited ability to determine the relative contributions of pre-morbid vulnerability, injury-related, and trauma-related factors, due to the lack of pre-injury assessment. In particular, pre-morbid characteristics such as cardiovascular disease burden and lifetime substance use history have been shown to impact the characteristics of white matter and is an important source of inter-subject variability in this sample. Longitudinal investigations are necessary to disentangle multifactorial contributions, including possible interactions with cerebrovascular risk factors and substance use, as well as possible sources of resiliency (e.g., social support), which would be salient to the Veteran population. Fourth, because FA is observed on the tract level for specific tracts, there may be more granular variations in microstructure within tract that were not explored, including other metrics of variability such as mean diffusivity, that could explain some of the counter-intuitive relationships observed in this study. The use of a pre-existing dataset (and older DWI sequence) precludes our ability to examine this more closely. The possibility of reduced crossing fibers contributing to higher values of FA warrants additional investigation, and has been previously reported (Figley et al., 2022). Finally, sample size, though relatively large given the integration of neuroimaging, autonomic, and neurobehavioral symptoms, is limited and replication of these findings is necessary. Though, it should be noted that others have previously reported differences in ventral-limbic pathway integrity in mild TBI and PTSD (Santhanam et al., 2019). In particular, our sample size limits our ability to fully parse the differences between mTBI with LoC, ambiguous mTBI (mTBI with alterations of consciousness alone), and those without a history of head strikes. Future research further probing heterogeneity within mTBI is necessary.

In conclusion, although this study cannot make determinations regarding causality, our findings add to the growing body of literature suggesting that history of TBI may interact with the symptoms of PTSD, regardless of the type of symptom (e.g., PTSD-related or post-concussive). Furthermore, we found evidence to suggest autonomic dysfunction and variability in ventral-limbic white matter pathways play a role in this relationship. Future research should explore autonomic functioning within this population to identify possible targets for intervention, public health strategies, and increase our understanding of the underlying mechanisms.

Data availability statement

The data analyzed in this study is subject to the following licenses/restrictions: Limited datasets are available upon request. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to am9obi53aWxsaWFtc29uJiN4MDAwNDA7dWZsLmVkdQ==.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the University of Florida Institutional Review Board. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

AW: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SB: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LJ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DL: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. GL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. JW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs grant IK2RX000707 (JW) and the Brain Rehabilitation Research Center. The contents of this article do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jake Rieke, Aidan Murphy, and Amy Tran.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) DL declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnimg.2023.1265001/full#supplementary-material

References

Alexander, A. L., Hasan, K. M., Lazar, M., Tsuruda, J. S., and Parker, D. L. (2001). Analysis of partial volume effects in diffusion-tensor MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 45, 770–780. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1105

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Alqahtani, J. S., Aldhahir, A. M., Alghamdi, S. M., Al Ghamdi, S. S., Al Draiwiesh, I. A., Alsulayyim, A. S., et al. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of heart rate variability in COPD. Front. Cardiovas. Med. 10, 1070327. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1070327

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Amick, M. M., Meterko, M., Fortier, C. B., Fonda, J. R., Milberg, W. P., McGlinchey, R. E., et al. (2018). The deployment trauma phenotype and employment status in veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The J. Head Trauma Rehab. 33, E30. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000308

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Antontseva, E., Bondar, N., Reshetnikov, V., and Merkulova, T. (2020). The effects of chronic stress on brain myelination in humans and in various rodent models. Neuroscience 441, 226–238. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.06.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Averill, C. L., Averill, L. A., Wrocklage, K. M., Scott, J. C., Akiki, T. J., Schweinsburg, B., et al. (2018). Altered white matter diffusivity of the cingulum angular bundle in posttraumatic stress disorder. MNP 4, 75–82. doi: 10.1159/000490464

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., and Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J. Mem. Lang. 59, 390–412.

Google Scholar

Badea, A., Kamnaksh, A., Anderson, R. J., Calabrese, E., Long, J. B., Agoston, D. V., et al. (2018). Repeated mild blast exposure in young adult rats results in dynamic and persistent microstructural changes in the brain. Neuroimage Clin. 18, 60–73. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bahraini, N. H., Simpson, G. K., Brenner, L. A., Hoffberg, A. S., and Schneider, A. L. (2013). Suicidal ideation and behaviours after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Impairment 14, 92–112. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2013.11

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Software 67, 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bazarian, J. J., Donnelly, K., Peterson, D. R., Warner, G. C., Zhu, T., Zhong, J., et al. (2013). The relation between posttraumatic stress disorder and mild traumatic brain injury acquired during operations enduring freedom and iraqi freedom. The J. Head Trauma Rehab. 28, 1–12. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e318256d3d3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bazarian, J. J., Zhong, J., Blyth, B., Zhu, T., Kavcic, V., Peterson, D., et al. (2007). Diffusion tensor imaging detects clinically important axonal damage after mild traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. J. Neurotrauma. 24, 1447–1459. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.0241

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Beissner, F., Meissner, K., Bär, K. J., and Napadow, V. (2013). The autonomic brain: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis for central processing of autonomic function. J. Neurosci. 33, 10503–10511. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1103-13.2013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Benge, J. F., Pastorek, N. J., and Thornton, G. M. (2009). Postconcussive symptoms in OEF–OIF veterans: factor structure and impact of posttraumatic stress. Rehab. Psychol. 54, 270. doi: 10.1037/a0016736

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Blennow, K., Hardy, J., and Zetterberg, H. (2012). The neuropathology and neurobiology of traumatic brain injury. Neuron 76, 886–899. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bolzenius, J. D., Velez, C. S., Lewis, J. D., Bigler, E. D., Wade, B. S., Cooper, D. B., et al. (2018). Diffusion imaging findings in US service members with mild traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder. The J. Head Trauma Rehab. 33, 393–402. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000378

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bonfield, C. M., Lam, S., Lin, Y., and Greene, S. (2013). The impact of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder on recovery from mild traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. 12, 97–102. doi: 10.3171/2013.5.PEDS12424

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bottari, S. A., Lamb, D. G., Murphy, A. J., Porges, E. C., Rieke, J. D., Harciarek, M., et al. (2021). Hyperarousal symptoms and decreased right hemispheric frontolimbic white matter integrity predict poorer sleep quality in combat-exposed veterans. Brain INJ 35, 922–933. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1927186

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Brain-Body Center (2007). CardioEdit Software. Vienna: Brain-Body Center.

Google Scholar

Brain-Body Center for Psychophysiology and Bioengineering (2016). CardioBatch Plus Software. Vienna: Brain-Body Center.

Google Scholar

Bubb, E. J., Metzler-Baddeley, C., and Aggleton, J. P. (2018). The cingulum bundle: anatomy, function, and dysfunction. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 92, 104–127. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Carlson, K. F., Kehle, S. M., Meis, L. A., Greer, N., MacDonald, R., Rutks, I., et al. (2011). Prevalence, assessment, and treatment of mild traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review of the evidence. The J. Head Trauma Rehab. 26, 103–115. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181e50ef1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cicerone, K. D., and Kalmar, K. (1995). Persistent postconcussion syndrome: the structure of subjective complaints after mild traumatic brain injury. The J. Head Trauma Rehab. 10, 1. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199510030-00002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Combs, H. L., Berry, D. T., Pape, T., Babcock-Parziale, J., Smith, B., Schleenbaker, R., et al. (2015). The effects of mild traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, and combined mild traumatic brain injury/post-traumatic stress disorder on returning veterans. J. Neurotrauma 32, 956–966. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3585

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Corrigan, J. D., and Bogner, J. (2007). Initial reliability and validity of the Ohio state university TBI identification method. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 22, 318–329. doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000300227.67748.77

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Costanzo, M. E., Jovanovic, T., Pham, D., Leaman, S., Highland, K. B., Norrholm, S. D., et al. (2016). White matter microstructure of the uncinate fasciculus is associated with subthreshold posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and fear potentiated startle during early extinction in recently deployed service members. Neurosci. Lett. 618, 66–71. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.02.041

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Daniels, J. K., Lamke, J. P., Gaebler, M., Walter, H., and Scheel, M. (2013). White matter integrity and its relationship to ptsd and childhood trauma—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dep. Anxiety 30, 207–216. doi: 10.1002/da.22044

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Davenport, N. D., Lamberty, G. J., Nelson, N. W., Lim, K. O., Armstrong, M. T., Sponheim, S. R., et al. (2016). PTSD confounds detection of compromised cerebral white matter integrity in military veterans reporting a history of mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 30, 1491–1500. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1219057

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Daviu, N., Bruchas, M. R., Moghaddam, B., Sandi, C., and Beyeler, A. (2019). Neurobiological links between stress and anxiety. Neurobiol. Stress 11, 100191. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2019.100191

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dolan, S., Martindale, S., Robinson, J., Kimbrel, N. A., Meyer, E. C., Kruse, M. I., et al. (2012). Neuropsychological sequelae of PTSD and TBI following war deployment among OEF/OIF veterans. Neuropsychol. Rev. 22, 21–34. doi: 10.1007/s11065-012-9190-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Figley, C. R., Uddin, M. N., Wong, K., Kornelsen, J., Puig, J., Figley, T. D., et al. (2022). Potential pitfalls of using fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity as biomarkers of cerebral white matter microstructure. Front. Neurosci. 15, 799576. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.799576

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fischl, B. (2012). FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 62, 774–781. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gilbert, K. S., Kark, S. M., Gehrman, P., and Bogdanova, Y. (2015). Sleep disturbances, TBI and PTSD: implications for treatment and recovery. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 40, 195–212. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Giza, C. C., and Hovda, D. A. (2014). The new neurometabolic cascade of concussion. Neurosurgery 75, S24–S33. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000505

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Haagsma, J. A., Scholten, A. C., Andriessen, T. M., Vos, P. E., Van Beeck, E. F., Polinder, S., et al. (2015). Impact of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder on functional outcome and health-related quality of life of patients with mild traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 32, 853–862. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3283

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamani, C., Davidson, B., Corchs, F., Abrahao, A., Nestor, S. M., Rabin, J. S., et al. (2022). Deep brain stimulation of the subgenual cingulum and uncinate fasciculus for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Sci. Adv. 8, eadc9970. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adc9970

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoover, P. J., Nix, C. A., Llop, J. Z., Lu, L. H., Bowles, A. O., Caban, J. J., et al. (2022). Correlations between the neurobehavioral symptom inventory and other commonly used questionnaires for traumatic brain injury. Mil. Med. 21, usab559. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usab559

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Isaac, L., Main, K. L., Soman, S., Gotlib, I. H., Furst, A. J., Kinoshita, L. M., et al. (2015). The impact of depression on veterans with PTSD and traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Biol. Psychol. 105, 20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.12.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jackson, C. E., Green, J. D., Bovin, M. J., Vasterling, J. J., Holowka, D. W., Ranganathan, G., et al. (2016). Mild traumatic brain injury, PTSD, and psychosocial functioning among male and female US OEF/OIF veterans. J. Traum. Stress 29, 309–316. doi: 10.1002/jts.22110

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jarczok, M. N., Weimer, K., Braun, C., Williams, D. P., Thayer, J. F., Guendel, H. O., et al. (2022). Heart rate variability in the prediction of mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of healthy and patient populations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 143, 104907. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104907

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, D. K., Christiansen, K. F., Chapman, R. J., and Aggleton, J. P. (2013). Distinct subdivisions of the cingulum bundle revealed by diffusion MRI fibre tracking: implications for neuropsychological investigations. Neuropsychologia 51, 67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaplan, G. B., Leite-Morris, K. A., Wang, L., Rumbika, K. K., Heinrichs, S. C., Zeng, X., et al. (2018). Pathophysiological bases of comorbidity: traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder. J. Neurotraum. 35, 210–225. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4953

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Karr, J. E., Areshenkoff, C. N., and Garcia-Barrera, M. A. (2014). The neuropsychological outcomes of concussion: a systematic review of meta-analyses on the cognitive sequelae of mild traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol. 28, 321. doi: 10.1037/neu0000037

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kulkarni, P., Morrison, T. R., Cai, X., Iriah, S., Simon, N., Sabrick, J., et al. (2019). Neuroradiological changes following single or repetitive mild TBI. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 13, 34. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00034

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lagarde, E., Salmi, L.-. R., Holm, L. W., Contrand, B., Masson, F., Ribéreau-Gayon, R., et al. (2014). Association of symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury with posttraumatic stress disorder vs postconcussion syndrome. JAMA Psychiatr. 71, 1032–1040. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.666

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lamb, D. G., Porges, E. C., Lewis, G. F., and Williamson, J. B. (2017). Non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation effects on hyperarousal and autonomic state in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder and history of mild traumatic brain injury: preliminary evidence. Front. Med. 4, 124. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00124

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Laude, D., Elghozi, J.-. L., Girard, A., Bellard, E., Bouhaddi, M., Castiglioni, P., et al. (2004). Comparison of various techniques used to estimate spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (the EuroBaVar study). Am. J. Physiol. Reg. Integ. Comp. Physiol. 286, R226–R231. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00709.2002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lellamo, F., Legramante, M., Raimondi, G., Castrucci, F., Massaro, M., Peruzzi, G., et al. (1996). Evaluation of reproducibility of spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity at rest and during laboratory tests. J. Hypert. 14, 1099. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199609000-00009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lepage, C., De Pierrefeu, G., Koerte, A., Coleman, I. K., Pasternak, M. J., Grant, O., et al. (2018). White matter abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury with and without post-traumatic stress disorder: a subject-specific diffusion tensor imaging study. Brain Imaging Behav. 12, 870–881. doi: 10.1007/s11682-017-9744-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lewis, G. F., Furman, S. A., McCool, M. F., and Porges, S. W. (2012). Statistical strategies to quantify respiratory sinus arrhythmia: are commonly used metrics equivalent? Biol. Psychol. 89, 349–364. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.11.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lippa, S. M., Fonda, J. R., Fortier, C. B., Amick, M. A., Kenna, A., Milberg, W. P., et al. (2015). Deployment-related psychiatric and behavioral conditions and their association with functional disability in OEF/OIF/OND veterans. J. Traum. Stress 28, 25–33. doi: 10.1002/jts.21979

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lopez, K. C., Leary, J. B., Pham, D. L., Chou, Y. Y., Dsurney, J., Chan, L., et al. (2017). Brain volume, connectivity, and neuropsychological performance in mild traumatic brain injury: The impact of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. J. Neurotrauma 34, 16–22. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4323

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

MacDonald, C. L., Johnson, A. M., Nelson, E. C., Werner, N. J., Fang, R., Flaherty, S. F., et al. (2014). Functional status after blast-plus-impact complex concussive traumatic brain injury in evacuated United States military personnel. J. Neurotrauma 31, 889–898. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3173

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mace, R. A., Waters, A. B., Sawyer, K. S., Turrisi, T., and Gansler, D. A. (2019). Components of executive function model regional prefrontal volumes. Neuropsychology 33, 1007. doi: 10.1037/neu0000563

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Macera, C. A., Aralis, H. J., MacGregor, A. J., Rauh, M. J., and Galarneau, M. R. (2012). Postdeployment Symptom Changes and Traumatic Brain Injury and/or Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Men. San Diego, CA: Naval Health Research Center.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Miles, S. R., Graham, D. P., and Teng, E. J. (2015). Examining the influence of mild traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder on alcohol use disorder in OEF/OIF veterans. Military Med. 180, 45–52. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00187

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Minassian, A., Maihofer, A. X., Baker, D. G., Nievergelt, C. M., Geyer, M. A., Risbrough, V. B., et al. (2015). Association of predeployment heart rate variability with risk of postdeployment posttraumatic stress disorder in active-duty marines. JAMA Psychiatr. 72, 979–986. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0922

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

O'Doherty, D. C., Ryder, W., Paquola, C., Tickell, A., Chan, C., Hermens, D. F., et al. (2018). White matter integrity alterations in post-traumatic stress disorder. Hum. Brain Mapping 39, 1327–1338. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23920

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

O'Neil, M. E., Callahan, M., Carlson, K. F., Roost, M., Laman-Maharg, B., Twamley, E. W., et al. (2017). Postconcussion symptoms reported by operation enduring freedom/operation Iraqi freedom veterans with and without blast exposure, mild traumatic brain injury, and posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 39, 449–458. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1232699

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

O'Neil, M. E., Klyce, D. W., Pogoda, T. K., Cifu, D. X., Eggleston, B. E., Cameron, D. C., et al. (2021). Associations among PTSD and postconcussive symptoms in the long-term impact of military-relevant brain injury consortium–chronic effects of neurotrauma consortium prospective, longitudinal study cohort. J. Head Trauma Rehab. 36, E363–E372. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000665

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Petrie, E. C., Cross, D. J., Yarnykh, V. L., Richards, T., Martin, N. M., Pagulayan, K., et al. (2014). Neuroimaging, behavioral, and psychological sequelae of repetitive combined blast/impact mild traumatic brain injury in Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans. J. Neurotrauma 31, 425–436. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2952

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pietrzak, R. H., Johnson, D. C., Goldstein, M. B., Malley, J. C., and Southwick, S. M. (2009). Posttraumatic stress disorder mediates the relationship between mild traumatic brain injury and health and psychosocial functioning in veterans of operations enduring freedom and Iraqi freedom. The J. Nerv. Mental Dis. 197, 748–753. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181b97a75

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Porges, S. W. (2001). The polyvagal theory: phylogenetic substrates of a social nervous system. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 42, 123–146. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(01)00162-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rieke, J. D., Lamb, D. G., Lewis, G. F., Davila, M. I., Schmalfuss, I. M., Murphy, A. J., et al. (2021). Posttraumatic stress disorder subsequent to apparent mild traumatic brain injury. Cogn. Behav. Neurol. 34, 26–37. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000264

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Roine, T., Jeurissen, B., Perrone, D., Aelterman, J., Leemans, A., Philips, W., et al. (2014). Isotropic non-white matter partial volume effects in constrained spherical deconvolution. Front. Neuroinform. 8, 28. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Santhanam, P., Teslovich, T., Wilson, S. H., Yeh, P. H., Oakes, T. R., Weaver, L. K., et al. (2019). Decreases in white matter integrity of ventro-limbic pathway linked to post-traumatic stress disorder in mild traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 36, 1093–1098. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5541

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schneider, M., and Schwerdtfeger, A. (2020). Autonomic dysfunction in posttraumatic stress disorder indexed by heart rate variability: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 50, 1937–1948. doi: 10.1017/S003329172000207X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Scimeca, L. M., Cothran, T., Larson, J. E., and Held, P. (2021). Factor analysis of the neurobehavioral symptom inventory in veterans with PTSD and no history of mild TBI. Appl. Neuropsychol. Adult 21, 1–8. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2021.2007386

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Seo, J. P., Kim, O. L., Kim, S. H., Chang, M. C., Kim, M. S., Son, S. M., et al. (2012). Neural injury of uncinate fasciculus in patients with diffuse axonal injury. NeuroRehabilitation 30, 323–328. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2012-0762

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shah, A. J., Lampert, R., Goldberg, J., Veledar, E., Bremner, J. D., Vaccarino, V., et al. (2013). Posttraumatic stress disorder and impaired autonomic modulation in male twins. Biol. Psychiatr. 73, 1103–1110. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.01.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tanielian, T. L., Tanielian, T., and Jaycox, L. (2008). Invisible Wounds of War: Psychological and Cognitive Injuries, Their Consequences, and Services to Assist Recovery. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

Google Scholar

Thayer, J. F., and Lane, R. D. (2009). Claude Bernard and the heart–brain connection: Further elaboration of a model of neurovisceral integration. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 33, 81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Vanderploeg, R. D., Silva, M. A., Soble, J. R., Curtiss, G., Belanger, H. G., Donnell, A. J., et al. (2015). The structure of postconcussion symptoms on the neurobehavioral symptom inventory: a comparison of alternative models. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 30, 1–11. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, K. K. W., Kobeissy, F. H., Shakkour, Z., and Tyndall, J. A. (2021). Thorough overview of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein as tandem biomarkers recently cleared by US food and drug administration for the evaluation of intracranial injuries among patients with traumatic brain injury. Acute Med. Surg. 8, e622. doi: 10.1002/ams2.622

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Weathers, F. W., Litz, B. T., Herman, D. S., Husaka, J. A., and Keane, T. M. (1993). “The PTSD checklist: reliability, validity and diagnostic utility,” in Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. San Antonio, TX: International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies.

Google Scholar

Williams, J. L., Monahan, C. J., and McDevitt-Murphy, M. E. (2011). Factor structure of the PTSD checklist in a sample of OEF/OIF veterans presenting to primary care: specific and nonspecific aspects of dysphoria. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess 33, 514–522. doi: 10.1007/s10862-011-9248-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Williamson, J. B., Heilman, K. M., Porges, E. C., Lamb, D. G., and Porges, S. W. (2013). A possible mechanism for PTSD symptoms in patients with traumatic brain injury: central autonomic network disruption. Front. Neuroeng. 6, 13. doi: 10.3389/fneng.2013.00013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Winter, B. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. arXiv [Preprint]. arXiv:1308.5499.

Google Scholar

Wolf, E. J., Logue, M. W., Hayes, J. P., Sadeh, N., Schichman, S. A., Stone, A., et al. (2016). Accelerated DNA methylation age: Associations with PTSD and neural integrity. Psychoneuroendocrinology 63, 155–162. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.09.020

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wright, D. K., Johnston, L. A., Kershaw, J., Ordidge, R., O'Brien, T. J., Shultz, S. R., et al. (2017). Changes in apparent fiber density and track-weighted imaging metrics in white matter following experimental traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 34, 2109–2118. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4730

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wulsin, L. R., Horn, P. S., Perry, J. L., Massaro, J. M., and D'Agostino, R. B. (2015). Autonomic imbalance as a predictor of metabolic risks, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and mortality. The J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 100, 2443–2448. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-1748

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xavier, C. H., Mendonça, M. M., Marins, F. R., Silva, d. a., Ianzer, E. S., Colugnati, D. D. B., et al. (2018). Stating asymmetry in neural pathways: methodological trends in autonomic neuroscience. Int. J. Neurosci. 128, 1078–1085. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2018.1473396

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yeh, P. H., Guan Koay, C., Wang, B., Morissette, J., Sham, E., Senseney, J., et al. (2017). Compromised neurocircuitry in chronic blast-related mild traumatic brain injury. Hum. Brain Mapping 38, 352–369. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23365

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yendiki, A., Panneck, P., Srinivasan, P., Stevens, A., Zöllei, L., Augustinack, J., et al. (2011). Automated probabilistic reconstruction of white-matter pathways in health and disease using an atlas of the underlying anatomy. Front. Neuroinform. 5, 23. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: TBI, PTSD, MRI, DTI, autonomic, baroreceptor, stress, limbic

Citation: Waters AB, Bottari SA, Jones LC, Lamb DG, Lewis GF and Williamson JB (2024) Regional associations of white matter integrity and neurological, post-traumatic stress disorder and autonomic symptoms in Veterans with and without history of loss of consciousness in mild TBI. Front. Neuroimaging 2:1265001. doi: 10.3389/fnimg.2023.1265001

Received: 21 July 2023; Accepted: 06 December 2023;
Published: 10 January 2024.

Edited by:

Jay M. Uomoto, Consultant, Black Diamond, United States

Reviewed by:

Marcos Brioschi, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Yuncong Ma, University of Pennsylvania, United States
Robert Steinbach, University Hospital Jena, Germany

Copyright © 2024 Waters, Bottari, Jones, Lamb, Lewis and Williamson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: John B. Williamson, am9obi53aWxsaWFtc29uJiN4MDAwNDA7dWZsLmVkdQ==; Abigail B. Waters, YS53YXRlcnMmI3gwMDA0MDt1ZmwuZWR1

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.