In the published article, there was an error in Figure 1 as published. The probability of success for block 3 in the bot condition should be 0.70, as correctly stated in Table 1 and the second paragraph of the Results section. However, in Figure 1, this value is incorrectly shown as 0.95. The corrected Figure 1 and its caption appear below.
Figure 1
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
Turing test, interaction, sensorimotor contingencies, reciprocity, perceptual crossing
Citation
Barone P, Bedia MG and Gomila A (2024) Corrigendum: A minimal Turing test: reciprocal sensorimotor contingencies for interaction detection. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 18:1507296. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1507296
Received
07 October 2024
Accepted
08 October 2024
Published
17 October 2024
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
18 - 2024
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Barone, Bedia and Gomila.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Pamela Barone pamela.barone@uib.es
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.