The concerning mortality rate in individuals affected by Anorexia Nervosa (AN; Arcelus et al., 2011) makes this topic extremely relevant, and the need to develop new therapeutic approaches urgent. For this reason we welcome Pollatos et al.'s (2016) work.
As it is well known, AN is a psychiatric disorder mainly involving the body, i.e., body representation and perception. Among other things, individuals with AN show difficulties in interoception (Pollatos et al., 2008; Strigo et al., 2013), i.e., perception of internal bodily signals (Craig, 2003). There is a large body of literature documenting the key role of interoception in a wide range of self-related processes, from regulation of primitive bodily needs (Berthoud, 2006; Brannigan et al., 2015) to self-awareness (Seth et al., 2012; Seth, 2013), through both behavioral (Herbert et al., 2007) and emotional regulation (Füstös et al., 2013). That is the reason why improving interoceptive accuracy (IAcc) in individuals suffering from AN is so relevant.
In their work, Pollatos et al. (2016) investigated if self-focused attention may be a viable route for improving IAcc in individuals with AN, as it is in healthy individuals (Ainley et al., 2012).
In their work, the authors asked both AN and healthy individuals to perform the heartbeat perception task (Schandry, 1981), while they were looking at their own or at another (unknown) woman's face. In this way, the authors were able to compare IAcc of both groups under enhanced and decreased self-focused attention, respectively. The results showed that interoceptive accuracy during looking at their own face was lower than during looking at another woman's face in individuals with AN, whereas the opposite pattern emerged in healthy individuals. The authors speculated that in AN individual's looking at their own face could trigger avoidance of attention on both outer and inner body, thereby reducing their IAcc.
Due to a lack of information about interoceptive accuracy at the baseline, it cannot be ruled out that looking at another person's face enhanced IAcc, whereas looking at their own face reduced IAcc in individuals with AN.
We hypothesize, together with the authors, that looking at their own face in individuals with AN decreases self-focused attention because of body-related avoidance. In addition, we hypothesize that looking at another woman's face enhanced self-focused attention in AN individuals by means of social comparison processes. In other words, it can be inferred that self-focus enhances IAcc in AN as in the healthy control group, but the difference would lie in how self-focus is achieved: looking at their own face in healthy individuals and looking at another woman's face in AN individuals.
Social comparison, i.e., the comparison between the self and the others (Festinger, 1954), engages everyone continuously, but individuals with eating disorders compare themselves with others more unfavorably than healthy individuals (Troop et al., 2003).
Furthermore, viewing another woman's body evokes more negative affect and enhances limbic activity in AN than in healthy individuals. It has been hypothesized that social comparison elicits negative emotions in anorectic individuals and it is related to limbic activation (Vocks et al., 2010). Moreover, AN individuals showed similar or even higher insular activation during a task of self-other comparison, and lower insular activation during processing of images of self rather than healthy subjects (Sachdev et al., 2008; Friederich et al., 2010). As it is well known, insula has a key role in interoception, and in healthy people higher insular activation seems to correspond to higher interoceptive accuracy (Critchley et al., 2004).
Finally, quite recently Nunn and colleagues proposed “the insula hypothesis” in AN (Nunn et al., 2008, 2011), which states that the lack of integrity of the insular cortex can explain the perceptual, emotional, behavioral and cognitive profile of AN (for a review of the role of the insula in AN, see Kaye et al., 2009, 2013).
Then, taking into account (a) the results of Pollatos et al. (2016), (b) the documented insular activation in AN individuals triggered by viewing image of other women—that in turn activates social comparison processes (Sachdev et al., 2008; Friederich et al., 2010), and (C) the insula hypothesis in AN (Nunn et al., 2008, 2011), we challengingly speculate that social comparison could be used, at least initially, in the treatment of AN to enhance self-focused attention which, as shown by Ainley et al. in healthy individuals (Ainley et al., 2012), is a way to improve IAcc.
In order to challenge our hypothesis that social comparison could be an initial way to improve IAcc in AN individuals by virtue of its capacity to activate the insula, future research should investigate brain activation in both healthy and anorectic individuals during a heartbeat perception task performed while looking at their own or at another person's face.
Statements
Author contributions
All authors listed, have made substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AinleyV.Tajadura-JiménezA.FotopoulouA.TsakirisM. (2012). Looking into myself: changes in interoceptive sensitivity during mirror self-observation. Psychophysiology49, 1672–1676. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01468.x
2
ArcelusJ.MitchellA. J.WalesJ.NielsenS. (2011). Mortality rates in patients with anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders. A meta-analysis of 36 studies. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry68, 724–731. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.74
3
BerthoudH. R. (2006). Homeostatic and non-homeostatic pathways involved in the control of food intake and energy balance. Obesity14(Suppl. 5), 197S–200S. 10.1038/oby.2006.308
4
BranniganM.StevensonR. J.FrancisH. (2015). Thirst interoception and its relationship to a Western-style diet. Physiol. Behav.139, 423–429. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.11.050
5
CraigA. D. (2003). Interoception : the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.13, 500–505. 10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00090-4
6
CritchleyH. D.WiensS.RotshteinP.OhmanA.DolanR. J.ÖhmanA.et al. (2004). Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nat. Neurosci.7, 189–195. 10.1038/nn1176
7
FestingerL. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Hum. Relations7, 117–140. 10.1177/001872675400700202
8
FriederichH. C.BrooksS.UherR.CampbellI. C.GiampietroV.BrammerM.et al. (2010). Neural correlates of body dissatisfaction in anorexia nervosa. Neuropsychologia48, 2878–2885. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.036
9
FüstösJ.GramannK.HerbertB. M.PollatosO. (2013). On the embodiment of emotion regulation: interoceptive awareness facilitates reappraisal. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci.8, 911–917. 10.1093/scan/nss089
10
HerbertB. M.UlbrichP.SchandryR. (2007). Interoceptive sensitivity and physical effort: implications for the self-control of physical load in everyday life. Psychophysiology44, 194–202. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00493.x
11
KayeW. H.FudgeJ. L.PaulusM. (2009). New insights into symptoms and neurocircuit function of anorexia nervosa. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.10, 573–584. 10.1038/nrn2682
12
KayeW. H.WierengaC. E.BailerU. F.SimmonsA. N.Bischoff-GretheA. (2013). Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels: the neurobiology of anorexia nervosa. Trends Neurosci.36, 110–120. 10.1016/j.tins.2013.01.003
13
NunnK.FramptonI.FuglsetT. S.Törzsök-SonnevendM.LaskB. (2011). Anorexia nervosa and the insula. Med. Hypotheses76, 353–357. 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.10.038
14
NunnK.FramptonI. J.GordonI.LaskB. (2008). The fault is not in her parents but in her insula - A neurobiological hypothesis of anorexia nervosa. Eur. Eat. Disord. Rev.16, 355–360. 10.1002/erv.890
15
PollatosO.HerbertB. M.BerberichG.ZaudigM.KrauseneckT.TsakirisM. (2016). Atypical self-focus effect on interoceptive accuracy in anorexia nervosa. Front. Hum. Neurosci.10:484. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00484
16
PollatosO.KurzA.AlbrechtJ.SchrederT.MariaA.SchöpfV.et al. (2008). Reduced perception of bodily signals in anorexia nervosa. Eat. Behav.9, 381–388. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2008.02.001
17
SachdevP.MondratyN.WenW.GullifordK. (2008). Brains of anorexia nervosa patients process self-images differently from non-self-images: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia46, 2161–2168. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.031
18
SchandryR. (1981). Heart beat perception and emotional experience. Psychophysiology18, 483–488. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb02486.x
19
SethA. K. (2013). Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends Cogn. Sci.17, 565–573. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007
20
SethA. K.SuzukiK.CritchleyH. D. (2012). An interoceptive predictive coding model of conscious presence. Front. Psychol. 2:395. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00395
21
StrigoI. A.MatthewsS. C.SimmonsA. N.OberndorferT.KlabundeM.ReinhardtL. E.et al. (2013). Altered insula activation during pain anticipation in individuals recovered from anorexia nervosa: evidence of interoceptive dysregulation. Int. J. Eat. Disord.46, 23–33. 10.1002/eat.22045
22
TroopN. A.AllanS.TreasureJ. L.KatzmanM. (2003). Social comparison and submissive behaviour in eating disorder patients. Psychol. Psychother.76, 237–249. 10.1348/147608303322362479
23
VocksS.BuschM.GrönemeyerD.SchulteD.HerpertzS.SuchanB. (2010). Neural correlates of viewing photographs of one's own body and another woman's body in anorexia and bulimia nervosa: an fMRI study. J. Psychiatry Neurosci.35, 163–176. 10.1503/jpn.090048
Summary
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, interoceptive accuracy, self-focused attention, social comparison, insular cortex
Citation
Lucci G and Patrikelis P (2017) Commentary: Atypical Self-Focus Effect on Interoceptive Accuracy in Anorexia Nervosa. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11:228. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00228
Received
10 January 2017
Accepted
19 April 2017
Published
05 May 2017
Volume
11 - 2017
Edited by
Pietro Cipresso, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Italy
Reviewed by
Annika Petra Christine Lutz, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Updates
Copyright
© 2017 Lucci and Patrikelis.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Giuliana Lucci g.lucci@unimarconi.it
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.