
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Hum. Neurosci. , 17 November 2016
Sec. Brain Imaging and Stimulation
Volume 10 - 2016 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00584
This article is a correction to:
No Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Motor Cortex on Response-Related ERPs during a Conflict Task
A corrigendum on
No Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Motor Cortex on Response-Related ERPs during a Conflict Task
by Conley, A. C., Fulham, W. R., Marquez, J. L., Parsons, M. W., and Karayanidis, F. (2016). Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10:384. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00384
It has come to the authors' attention that there is an error in Figure 4. Specifically, the line colors used in the LRP waveforms are not consistent with what is indicated in the legend. The authors sincerely apologize for the error. This error has been corrected in the revised figure.
Figure 4. LRP waveforms for directional (blue) and non-directional (red) conditions in target-locked (left) and response-locked (right) LRP waveforms following active (i.e., anodal tDCS) and sham for (A) young and (B) old adults.
It is important to note that this error does not impact the conclusions of the article in any way, but may confuse readers as the direction of effects depicted in the original figure do not match the text.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Keywords: transcranial direct current stimulation, event-related potential, contingent negative variation, lateralized readiness potential, P300, aging
Citation: Conley AC, Fulham WR, Marquez JL, Parsons MW and Karayanidis F (2016) Corrigendum: No Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Motor Cortex on Response-Related ERPs during a Conflict Task. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10:584. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00584
Received: 18 October 2016; Accepted: 03 November 2016;
Published: 17 November 2016.
Edited and reviewed by: Mikhail Lebedev, Duke University, USA
Copyright © 2016 Conley, Fulham, Marquez, Parsons and Karayanidis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Frini Karayanidis, ZnJpbmkua2FyYXlhbmlkaXNAbmV3Y2FzdGxlLmVkdS5hdQ==
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.