GENERAL COMMENTARY article

Front. Hum. Neurosci., 21 July 2015

Sec. Brain Imaging and Stimulation

Volume 9 - 2015 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00415

This article is part of the Research TopicSleep Spindles: Breaking the Methodological WallView all 19 articles

Corrigendum: A comparison of two sleep spindle detection methods based on all night averages: individually adjusted vs. fixed frequencies

This article is a commentary on:

  1. A comparison of two sleep spindle detection methods based on all night averages: individually adjusted vs. fixed frequencies

    1. Read original article
Pter P. UjmaPéter P. Ujma1Ferenc GombosFerenc Gombos2Lisa GenzelLisa Genzel3Boris N. KonradBoris N. Konrad4Pter Simor,Péter Simor5,6Axel SteigerAxel Steiger4Martin Dresler,*Martin Dresler4,7*Rbert Bdizs,Róbert Bódizs1,2
  • 1Institute of Behavioral Science, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
  • 2Department of General Psychology, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary
  • 3Centre for Cognitive and Neural Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  • 4Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
  • 5Department of Cognitive Sciences, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
  • 6Nyírõ Gyula Hospital, National Institute of Psychiatry and Addictions, Budapest, Hungary
  • 7Donders Institute, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands

A Corrigendum on
A comparison of two sleep spindle detection methods based on all night averages: individually adjusted vs. fixed frequencies

by Ujma, P. P., Gombos, F., Genzel, L., Konrad, B. N., Simor, P., Steiger, A., et al. (2015). Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:52. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00052

The description of the Individual Adjustment Method (IAM) algorithm for sleep spindle analyses (Ujma et al., 2015) contained an error, which we hereby rectify. On page 5, line 7–8, instead of f(x) = e∧(−(x−xm)/(w/2)), the equation should read as follows:

f(x) = e∧−(((x−xm)/(w/2))∧2)

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Ujma, P. P., Gombos, F., Genzel, L., Konrad, B. N., Simor, P., Steiger, A., et al. (2015). A comparison of two sleep spindle detection methods based on all night averages: individually adjusted vs. fixed frequencies. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:52. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00052

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: sleep spindles, EEG, individual adjustment method, IAM, algorithm

Citation: Ujma PP, Gombos F, Genzel L, Konrad BN, Simor P, Steiger A, Dresler M and Bódizs R (2015) Corrigendum: A comparison of two sleep spindle detection methods based on all night averages: individually adjusted vs. fixed frequencies. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:415. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00415

Received: 01 June 2015; Accepted: 06 July 2015;
Published: 21 July 2015.

Edited and reviewed by: Simon C. Warby, Stanford University, USA

Copyright © 2015 Ujma, Gombos, Genzel, Konrad, Simor, Steiger, Dresler and Bódizs. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Martin Dresler,ZHJlc2xlckBtcGlwc3lrbC5tcGcuZGU=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.