Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Neurol., 22 January 2025
Sec. Stroke
This article is part of the Research Topic Cerebral cavernous malformations View all 3 articles

Use of balloon angioplasty for patients with intracranial large atherosclerotic acute ischemic stroke and cerebral cavernous malformation: a case report

Yiwan WangYiwan Wang1Tianyu Wang
Tianyu Wang2*Jiangmin Liang
&#x;Jiangmin Liang3*
  • 1Department of Emergency, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, China
  • 2Department of Neurology, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, China
  • 3Department of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, China

Thus far, clinical data relating to the treatment of cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) patients with acute stroke (AIS) are incredibly scare due to the low incidence of CCM. Furthermore, the safety profile of using tissue plasminogen activator, the only drug approved for AIS treatment within 4.5 h, remains controversial in patients with CCM. Recently, balloon angioplasty has been reported as a successful treatment for intracranial large atherosclerotic AIS patients. In our department, we treated a patient with intracranial large atherosclerotic AIS and CCM using balloon angioplasty, resulting in a positive outcome. Here, we discuss the safety and efficiency of balloon angioplasty for the treatment of intracranial large atherosclerotic AIS in patients with CCM. In conclusion, we suggest that balloon angioplasty may be a potentially safe and effective treatment for intracranial large atherosclerotic AIS patients with CCM. However, further research is needed to explore the use of mechanical revascularization in AIS patients with CCM.

Introduction

Cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) is a major cause of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), with an incidence of only 0.5% (1). A previous retrospective analysis of over 20,000 autopsies found that 95% of CCM cases were asymptomatic (1). Due to its low incidence, there is a considerable lack of clinical data relating to the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and CCM.

AIS is a major cause of disability and death, and its treatment has evolved considerably over recent decades. At present, intravenous tissue plasminogen activator is the only drug proven to be beneficial for AIS patients within 4.5 h of symptom onset. However, several articles have reported cases of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and even death in CCM patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (2).

Endovascular therapy, such as stenting and balloon angioplasty, are becoming increasingly important for the treatment of stroke, especially for patients with contraindications for intravenous thrombolytic therapy. However, until now, the safety and efficiency of balloon angioplasty for acute stroke patients with CCM has not been specifically investigated. Herein, we present the case of an AIS patient with intracranial large artery atherosclerosis and CCM who received balloon angioplasty.

Case report

A 58-year-old male, was admitted to our neurological department on the 4th of June 2022 due to the fact that 2.5 h previously, he suffered a sudden onset of slurred speech which lasted for approximately 5 min, but then recovered spontaneously. However, these symptoms recurred approximately 10 min later; on this occasion, the patient did not recover. His medical history included hypertension, managed with 2.5 mg/day of amlodipine, gastrointestinal hemorrhage within the last 3 weeks, an ischemic stroke within 3 months previously without sequelae (26th of April 2022), and radical rectal cancer surgery 6 months previously.

Upon arrival, neurological examination revealed mild left facial paralysis, dysarthria, with a score of 3 on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography identified an ischemic stroke lesion in the paraventricular region, along with stenosis in the right middle cerebral artery, left vertebral artery, and right posterior cerebral artery (Figures 1AC). A lesion in the left cerebellum was revealed and evaluated by MRI, susceptibility-weighted imaging and computed tomography, performed at our hospital on August 5th, 2020, confirming the presence of a CCM (Figures 1DG). Arterial spin labeling further indicated hypoperfusion in the right cerebral hemisphere. Due to contraindications for intravenous thrombolytic therapy, we considered mechanical revascularization. Surgery was commenced approximately 180 min after the onset of symptoms. During the procedure, we used a 5 French guiding catheter and a synchro2 micro-catheter. Stenosis in the right middle cerebral artery was confirmed (Figure 1H). Thus, we performed balloon pre-dilation with 2.0 × 15-mm and 2.5 × 15-mm balloons in the M1 segment and administered with tirofiban. Ten minutes later, we achieved successful dilation with a grade 2b thrombolysis on the cerebral infarction scale (Figure 1I); therefore, stenting and mechanical thrombectomy were not required. During hospitalization, the patient showed as “++” for fecal occult blood, thus suggesting that he had suffered from a gastrointestinal hemorrhage. His hemoglobin level was within the normal range, at 153 g/L. Postoperatively, we initiated aspirin. During hospitalization, his symptoms improved slightly, reflected by an NIHSS score of 2. The patient was subsequently discharged 6 days later.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. (A, B) Ischemic stroke lesion in the paraventricular region; (C) Stenosis in the right middle cerebral artery; (D–G): Cerebral cavernous malformation in the left cerebellum (D): T1, (E): T2, (F): susceptibility-weighted imaging, (G): computed tomography; (H): Stenosis in the right middle cerebral artery; (I): Successful dilation in the right middle cerebral artery; (J): Right middle cerebral artery in follow-up period.

During the follow-up period, we re-performed magnetic resonance angiography (4 months after discharge); this scan did not reveal any evidence of restenosis (Figure 1I). The patient was subsequently followed-up on the 16th of October 2024; no further complaints were reported.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first article to discuss the safety and efficiency of balloon angioplasty for the treatment of intracranial large atherosclerosis AIS patients with CCM. This is also the first study to report mechanical revascularization in such patients.

CCM is an important risk factor for ICH, despite its low prevalence of approximately 0.5% (1). CCM is a cerebrovascular malformation that is usually located in the brain, spinal cord, or rarely, the dura. Generally, CCM can be divided into two types: familial or sporadic (3). Most patients with CCM are asymptomatic, while others experience certain symptoms such as headaches, seizures, or focal neurological deficits, often associated with ICH (3). A retrospective study, performed over 8 years and involving 133 patients, reported an overall hemorrhage rate of 2.19% annually (4). Thus, the risk factor for hemorrhage in CCM has already been addressed.

Interestingly, a previous cohort study found that the administration of anti-thrombotic agents (such as anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents) did not increase the frequency of CCM-associated ICH (5). Furthermore, a previous meta-analysis suggested that anti-thrombotic therapy could reduce the incidence of ICH in CCM patients (6). Anti-thrombotic treatment was also used to treat our present patient with no evidence of hemorrhage during follow-up. This has led some researchers to hypothesize that ICH may result from thrombus formation in associated venous malformations or within the dilated caverns of CCMs due to slow blood flow (6).

However, due to limited clinical data, the safety of tissue plasminogen activator in the treatment of AIS patients with CCM remains uncertain. A recent study, including 30 patients, reported that the risk of sICH in AIS patients with CCM after thrombolysis was relatively higher than regular patients (10% versus 3.5%) (2). Although this finding may be associated with publication and reporting bias, along with a small sample size, this finding highlights the need for caution with regards to the risk of hemorrhage. Furthermore, indications for thrombolysis are more strict than mechanical revascularization, including a shorter treatment window.

The treatment of stroke has evolved considerably since coronary angioplasty was introduced into clinical practice by Gruntzig et al. (7). Numerous studies have proven the safety and efficiency of balloon angioplasty for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (811). The combination of a balloon guide catheter and stent retrievers has already been recommended by guidelines produced by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (COR IIa; LOE C-LD) (12). However, the application of direct balloon angioplasty to treat stroke is not specifically mentioned in these guidelines. A recent retrospective cohort study involving 68 patients suggested that direct balloon angioplasty might represent an effective and safe method to treat AIS patients with intracranial large atherosclerosis (8). However, balloon angioplasty is associated with certain drawbacks, including restenosis (8). In another study, Chen et al. reviewed the ratio of restenosis from four cohorts and found that this key ratio ranged from 0 to11.8% (Table 1) (8). However, our present patient did not experience restenosis during the follow-up period. Furthermore, in these previous articles, intravenous tissue plasminogen activator was not used as a criterion for exclusion, and the occurrence of sICH ranged from 0–4.4% (Table 1), thus suggesting that balloon angioplasty may not increase the risk of hemorrhage (8). However, patients with intracranial atherosclerosis were the main research targets described in these previous articles; in contrast, patients with other Acute Stroke Treatment classifications, such as cardioembolism, were not fully discussed. Furthermore, our present case was disadvantaged because the patient had mild symptoms; thus, our case cannot provide strong support with regards to efficiency. Another disadvantage is the retrospective design of our case report.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The rates of sICH and restenosis in four different published cohorts.

Finally, it is important to consider that clinical data relating to the treatment of AIS patients with CCM is very scare. Our present case suggested that balloon angioplasty might be a potential therapy for intracranial large atherosclerosis AIS patient with CCM. In clinical practice, each AIS patient with CCM should undergo an individual, comprehensive evaluation by a clinical practitioner. Given the potentially higher risk of hemorrhage, balloon angioplasty may be superior for the treatment of thrombolysis in intracranial large atherosclerosis AIS patients with CCM. Furthermore, since balloon angioplasty has been primarily tested in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis, other mechanical revascularization methods should be considered for CCM patients with non-intracranial atherosclerosis AIS. Future research should evaluate the risk–benefit stratification of the use of mechanical revascularization for AIS patients with CCM.

Conclusion

This is the first study to report the use of balloon angioplasty in treating intracranial large atherosclerotic AIS patients with CCM. Our findings suggested that balloon angioplasty might be a safe and effective treatment for these patients, potentially offering advantages over thrombolysis. Future research should investigate the use of mechanical revascularization for AIS patients with CCM.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because of ethical and privacy restrictions. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent from the patients/participants or patients/participants legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

YW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. TW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our departmental colleagues for their assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Otten, P, Pizzolato, GP, Rilliet, B, and Berney, J. 131 cases of cavernous Angioma (Cavernomas) of the Cns, discovered by retrospective analysis of 24, 535 autopsies. Neurochirurgie. (1989) 35:82–128.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

2. Lin, J, Weng, X, Zheng, J, Wu, S, Bao, Q, Peng, F, et al. Case report: thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke and cerebral cavernous malformation. Front Neurol. (2023) 14:1281412. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1281412

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Flemming, KD. Clinical Management of Cavernous Malformations. Curr Cardiol Rep. (2017) 19:122. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0931-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Hill, CS, Borg, A, Horsfall, HL, Al-Mohammad, A, Grover, P, and Kitchen, N. Cerebral cavernous malformation: management, outcomes, and surveillance strategies - a single Centre retrospective cohort study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2023) 225:107576. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107576

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Schneble, HM, Soumare, A, Herve, D, Bresson, D, Guichard, JP, Riant, F, et al. Antithrombotic therapy and bleeding risk in a prospective cohort study of patients with cerebral cavernous malformations. Stroke. (2012) 43:3196–9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.668533

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Zuurbier, SM, Hickman, CR, Tolias, CS, Rinkel, LA, Leyrer, R, Flemming, KD, et al. Long-term antithrombotic therapy and risk of intracranial Haemorrhage from cerebral cavernous malformations: a population-based cohort study, systematic review, and Meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. (2019) 18:935–41. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30231-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Gruntzig, AR, Senning, A, and Siegenthaler, WE. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. (1979) 301:61–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197907123010201

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Chen, W, Gong, J, Song, R, Liu, J, Wang, M, Zhang, T, et al. Efficacy and safety of direct balloon angioplasty in the treatment of large atherosclerotic stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2021) 211:107035. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107035

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Luo, Y, Huang, J, Yang, Y, Liu, H, Chen, X, Li, X, et al. Effect of direct angioplasty therapy on acute middle cerebral artery occlusion with good leptomeningeal collateral. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2020) 190:105744. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105744

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kim, JG, Suh, DC, Song, Y, Choi, JC, and Lee, DH. Direct stenting of intracranial atherosclerosis-related acute large vessel occlusion. Clin Neuroradiol. (2021) 31:833–41. doi: 10.1007/s00062-020-00934-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Zhang, G, Ling, Y, Zhu, S, Wu, P, Wang, C, Qi, J, et al. Direct angioplasty for acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large vessel occlusion. Interv Neuroradiol. (2020) 26:602–7. doi: 10.1177/1591019920949674

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Powers, WJ, Rabinstein, AA, Ackerson, T, Adeoye, OM, Bambakidis, NC, Becker, K, et al. Guidelines for the early Management of Patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. (2019) 50:e344–418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: balloon angioplasty, intracranial large atherosclerotic, acute stroke, cerebral cavernous malformation, case report

Citation: Wang Y, Wang T and Liang J (2025) Use of balloon angioplasty for patients with intracranial large atherosclerotic acute ischemic stroke and cerebral cavernous malformation: a case report. Front. Neurol. 16:1500451. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1500451

Received: 23 September 2024; Accepted: 06 January 2025;
Published: 22 January 2025.

Edited by:

Mirjam R. Heldner, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

Reviewed by:

Lipeng Yang, Tsinghua University, China
Xiangyu Gao, Fourth Military Medical University, China
Yixin Tong, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Germany

Copyright © 2025 Wang, Wang and Liang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Tianyu Wang, d2FuZ3R5ZzAxNkAxNjMuY29tJiangmin Liang, a2F0eWxqbUAxNjMuY29t

ORCID: Jiangmin Liang, orcid.org/0009-0006-9581-1894

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.