This article is a correction to:
Distinct Neural Substrates Support Phonological and Orthographic Working Memory: Implications for Theories of Working Memory
Jeremy Purcell
Brenda Rapp
Randi C. Martin- 1Maryland Neuroimaging Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States
- 2Cognitive Science Department, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
- 3Department of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States
A corrigendum on
Distinct neural substrates support phonological and orthographic working memory: implications for theories of working memory
by Purcell, J. J., Rapp, B., and Martin, R. (2021). Front. Neurol. 12:681141. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.681141
In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Figure 4 as published. The color assignments to the different clusters in Figure 4 were incorrect. Phonological Working Memory should be associated with the green color, not the magenta color. Orthographic Working Memory should be associated with the magenta color, not the green color. The corrected legend appears below with the color names correctly assigned to their respective cognitive functions.
SVR-LSM results for Phonological Working Memory (green) and Orthographic Working Memory (magenta). Clusters projected onto a left hemisphere standard MNI152 cortical surface using mni2fs (56). Each image depicts the results using thresholds which, from left to right, are based on increasingly more lenient thresholds from the permutation analysis. Although there is some overlap (white) at the two most lenient thresholds, there is none at the more conservative max and 10th voxel thresholds.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: working memory, phonological working memory, orthographic working memory, multivariate lesion symptom mapping, working memory deficits, buffer theories, embedded processes theories
Citation: Purcell J, Rapp B and Martin RC (2024) Corrigendum: Distinct neural substrates support phonological and orthographic working memory: implications for theories of working memory. Front. Neurol. 15:1369793. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1369793
Received: 12 January 2024; Accepted: 15 January 2024;
Published: 29 January 2024.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2024 Purcell, Rapp and Martin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jeremy Purcell, anB1cmNlbDgmI3gwMDA0MDt1bWQuZWR1