Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 11 January 2024
Sec. Dementia and Neurodegenerative Diseases
This article is part of the Research Topic Neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognitive impairment View all 16 articles

Mental states in caregivers toward people with Alzheimer’s disease at different stages

Bei Li&#x;Bei Li1Haiqiang Jin&#x;Haiqiang Jin1Guiying Yan,Guiying Yan2,3Chen ZhangChen Zhang1Siwei ChenSiwei Chen1Yue Wang,Yue Wang4,5Ting WangTing Wang1Qiaoqin WanQiaoqin Wan6Zhimin Wei
Zhimin Wei7*Yongan Sun
Yongan Sun1*
  • 1Department of Neurology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
  • 2Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 3School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 4The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders and Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 5Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 6Nursing School of Peking University, Beijing, China
  • 7Health Service Department of the Guard Bureau of the Joint Staff Department, Beijing, China

Introduction: Caring for people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is burdensome, especially when family members act as caregivers. This multicenter survey first aimed to investigate caregivers’ mental states as well as its influencing factors in caring for people with different severities of AD in China.

Methods: People with AD and their caregivers from 30 provincial regions in mainland China were enrolled from October 2020 to December 2020 to be surveyed for caregivers’ mental states and living conditions, as well as caregivers’ attitudes toward treatment and caring. Logistic regression was used to explore the factors that influence the positive and negative states of caregivers who care for people with different stages of AD.

Results: A total of 1,966 valid questionnaires were analyzed (mild AD: 795, moderate AD: 521, severe AD: 650). A total of 73.6% of caregivers maintained normal states (mild group: 71.9%, moderate group: 73.9%, severe group: 75.2%; X2 = 2.023, p = 0.364), and the proportions of caregivers with positive and negative states were 26.3% (mild group: 38.4%, moderate group: 24.6%, severe group: 13.1%; X2 = 119.000, p < 0.001) and 36.5% (mild group: 25.2%, moderate group: 36.9%, severe group: 50.2%; X2 = 96.417, p < 0.001), respectively. The major factors that both influenced caregivers’ positive and negative states were the severity of AD, perceived efficacy of treatment, safety issues after AD dementia diagnosis and perceived social support (p < 0.005), while neuropsychiatric symptoms causing stress in caregivers (p < 0.001) only affected the negative states of caregivers. The results of further analysis according to disease severity showed that safety issues after AD dementia diagnosis (p < 0.005) only made significant differences in the mild-to-moderate group.

Conclusion: To reduce negative states and promote positive states among caregivers, flexible and sensitive caregiving support could be built on caregivers’ demands in caring for people with different stages of AD. The support of emotion, social functioning and nursing skills is one of the significant ways for health workers to enhance caregivers’ competency.

Introduction

Dementia is the most prevalent condition that necessitates caregivers in the aging population (1). The number of individuals globally with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), which is the major type of dementia, will reach 150 million by 2050 (2). According to the report of the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2019, dementia costs globally 1.3 trillion US dollars, and informal caregivers of family members with dementia provide on average 5 h of care and supervision per day (1). It is well known that dementia caregivers have more mental health problems than noncaregivers (3, 4). High levels of anxiety, depression, stress, and distress in caregivers of people with AD have been confirmed (58). In addition, the psychological burden may further cause somatic symptoms, such as hypertension and sleep disorders (5, 6). At the same time, mental burden could harm dyadic relationship quality and lead to caregivers’ negligence in mutual communication with people with AD (9). It could aggravate the difficulty of care when caregivers do not understand the need and the reason for psychobehavioral symptoms presented in patients (10). Therefore, efforts could be made to improve the mental health of caregivers.

Caregivers might express different mental states toward the demands of caring for people with AD. Indeed, the adaptation process of caregiving is characterized by the coexistence of both positive and negative experiences (11). In the negative aspect of caring, previous literature showed that caring for someone with AD was related to feelings of burden, perceived stress, depression, anxiety, and loneliness, especially after the wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (3, 7). However, Rosa et al. found that caregivers with a high level of capacity for successful adaptation in the face of stressful demands of care reported fewer emotional problems (12). There was evidence that caring duties could also bring positive experiences such as a sense of personal accomplishment and gratification (9). Positive aspects refer to the extent to which the caregiving roles are experienced as inspiring and rewarding, yielding positive consequences and enriching one’s lived experience (9, 13). Hence, the formulation of intervention strategies to reduce stress and optimize positive experiences are essential to maintain caregivers’ mental health.

The caregiving support services for AD can be developed on the basis of factors affecting both the positive and negative states of caregivers. In the transactional model of stress and coping, the evaluation of a positive or negative attitude toward a stressor depends on a secondary appraisal of whether one’s resources, abilities, and methods are adequate (9, 14, 15). According to stress models, a systematic review revealed that the important determinants of caregiver burden and depression were patients’ behavioral problems or mood disorders, and caregiver resources, for example personality traits, coping styles, and competencies, might be considered mediators (15). Another review integrated the findings regarding positive aspects of caregiving, and indicated that social support consisting of emotional support and social interactional support played an essential role in positivity (9). In addition, the care demands of people with various stages of AD are different, and the mental health of caregivers may be driven by different factors according to disease severity. In terms of information needs, caregivers of people with mild dementia needed information on pharmacotherapy of the disease, while those caring for people with moderate to severe dementia were primarily concerned about dementia prognosis and health care services (16). A previous study found that caregivers’ capacity for successful adaptation was influenced by different factors between the groups of mild and moderate AD (12). The increase of caregiver burden might be related to the severity of cognitive deficit and neuropsychiatric symptoms (17, 18). Nevertheless, the flexibility and sensitivity of services to the specific needs of caregivers are the key components of the successful adaptation for care of people with AD at different stages (16, 19). The factors affecting the positive and negative states of caregivers during disease progression might receive attention.

In China, there are almost 9.83 million people aged 60 years or older with AD (20). More than 60% of families in a previous study expressed a medium to high level burden of caring for people with AD (21). The process of stress and coping is affected by traditional Chinese culture, such as the concepts of family, and the mental state of these caregivers might gradually change as the patient’s condition changes (22, 23). There is insufficient evidence to explore the mental states of caregivers and form suitable and sensitive caregiving support systems in China. This national survey first aimed to investigate the caregivers’ states of positive and negative mental states as well as its influencing factors in caring for people with AD with different severities, and further offers basic insight for health workers and researchers in China and worldwide.

Method

Study design and samples

The process of this large-sample, multicenter, cross-sectional survey has been previously described (24). Participants from 30 provincial, municipal, and autonomous regions in mainland China were enrolled between October 2020 and December 2020. Patients were diagnosed with probable AD dementia by cognitive experts from comprehensive psychiatric hospitals through a series of tests according to the national diagnostic guidelines (25) and were considered potential participants. People with other neurological diseases that were related to cognitive impairment and major psychiatric disorders were excluded, and then patients or their caregivers were introduced to the purpose and content of this survey. If they agreed with and provided informed consent, caregivers completed the questionnaires.

Measures and data collection

The demographic and clinical characteristics of people with AD were surveyed. This study also assessed caregivers’ mental states and living conditions, as well as caregivers’ attitudes toward treatment and caring. The questionnaire was derived from the results of a previous survey (21, 26) and had been modified by several specialists according to the aim of this study.

The assessments of demographic and clinical characteristics of people with AD were introduced previously (24), including gender, age, length of education, residential area, form of care, family earnings, and severity of AD. The severity of AD was estimated by neurologists based on patients’ symptoms and neuroimaging data according to the MTA criterion, which ranks the degree of hippocampal atrophy (27).

Caregivers’ mental states and living conditions were assessed with a self-designed questionnaire. Different feelings might coexist during the process of caregiving experience (9, 28). According to the valence of mental states (29), the item of caregivers’ current mental state toward patients was set as a multiple choice incorporating normal states, positive states and negative states. Normal states represented a willingness to bear hardships and fulfill responsibilities. Caregivers might passively drift along in this way. However, caregivers with positive states were full of hope and optimism. In contrast, negative states refers to a feeling of powerlessness, hopelessness, anxiety, or depression. Caregivers would be filled with despair and lose faith in the future. Caregivers’ living conditions had 7 options covering the possible changes in caregivers’ lives, such as the concept of value, relationship, time dependence, quality of life, and economic and emotional burden.

Caregivers’ attitudes toward treatment and caring were also assessed with self-designed items, including perceived efficacy of treatment, safety issues after AD dementia diagnosis, neuropsychiatric symptoms causing stress in caregivers, perceived social support, the situation of sharing troubles or stress, and the reasons for not talking about patients’ condition. The neuropsychiatric symptoms were derived from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) (30). Considering the cooccurrence of specific symptoms in some individuals, making it difficult to determine the unique effect of each symptom, we classified these symptoms into three symptom clusters: hyperactivity, psychosis, and physical behavior symptom clusters (3, 31).

Ethical consideration

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University First Hospital. The right to informed consent, voluntary participation, and confidentiality of responses were verbally assured.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 software. First, all variables were described as the means and SD or frequencies and percentages, as appropriate. Then, ANOVA and chi-square tests were used to calculate p values for differences, and further pairwise comparisons were performed to determine the differences between any two groups. Finally, binary logistic regression was used to explore the factors that influence the mental states of caregivers. On the basis of the mental states of caregivers, both positive and negative states were outcome variables. All the characteristics of patients and caregivers’ attitudes toward treatment and caring were considered potential influencing factors and filtered by the backward method with a likelihood ratio test. Among them, the multichoice variables were assigned as bivariate variables (e.g., whether or not safe issues have occurred after AD dementia diagnosis; whether or not there were gains from social support; whether or not sharing troubles or stress with others) to participate in regression analysis. In terms of the variable of neuropsychiatric symptoms, each symptom was assigned 1 point, and the total score of each participant was calculated for logistic analysis.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients

A total of 2,813 questionnaires were collected, and 1,966 valid questionnaires were analyzed. Questionnaires were eliminated for the incorrect and incomplete filling of items. A total of 40.4% (n = 795) of patients had mild AD, 26.5% (n = 521) of patients had moderate AD, and 33.1% (n = 650) of patients had severe AD. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the groups are presented in Table 1. Their average age was 73.1 ± 10.7 years (mild: 70.8 ± 10.8; moderate: 74.3 ± 10.3; severe: 75.0 ± 10.3; F = 33.170, p < 0.001). The results of pairwise comparisons between the two groups showed that the moderate and severe groups were older than the mild group (p < 0.001). According to the results of univariate analysis, people with different severities of AD had significant variation in demographic and clinical variables. Most patients were male (57.6%), had less than 6 years of schooling (37.3%), lived in an urban area (72.6%), and were cared for by family (92.7%).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The demographic and clinical characteristics of people with AD.

The caregivers’ mental states and living conditions

The results for caregivers’ mental states and living conditions across different stages from mild to severe AD are shown in Table 2. A total of 73.6% of caregivers were willing to bear hardships and fulfill responsibilities, and there were no significant differences across the three groups (X2 = 2.023, p = 0.364). While 36.5% of all caregivers and 50.2% of caregivers of people with severe AD expressed their negative mood, 26.3% of all caregivers and 38.4% of caregivers of people with mild AD felt a positive mood. Further analysis of pairwise comparison showed significant differences among all groups in the aspects of negative states (X2 = 96.417, p < 0.001) and positive states (X2 = 119.000, p < 0.001).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The caregivers’ meatal states and living conditions.

For changes in the life of caregivers, 66.5% showed an improvement in their concepts of value, and no significant differences were shown across the three groups (X2 = 1.573, p = 0.455). In terms of positive change, 34.5% of caregivers in the severe group indicated a closer relationship with the patients, and the severe group had a lower proportion than the mild or moderate group (X2 = 24.890, p < 0.001). However, 55.4% of all caregivers expressed a reduction in free time, and three groups showed significant differences (mild: 41.0%; moderate: 58.9%; severe: 70.2%; X2 = 126.540, p < 0.001). At the same time, among caregivers of people with severe AD, 51.2 and 50.3% of them expressed an increase in economic burden and a decline in quality of life, respectively. The results of further pairwise comparison indicated that their proportions were significantly different across the three groups (p < 0.001).

Caregivers’ attitudes toward treatment and caring

The caregivers’ attitudes toward treatment and caring are shown in Table 3. A total of 75.7% did not perceive effective improvement from treatment, and 19.3% of them did not receive help in caring skills from social support. During the process of caring, the safety issues were falls (39.6%) and wandering away (37.5%). The neuropsychiatric symptoms causing stress in caregivers were physical behavior symptoms (78.3%). In the mild group, the safety issues were falls (25.9%) and taking the wrong medicine (24.0%), and the neuropsychiatric symptoms were hyperactivity symptoms that led to stress (72.2%). Moreover, 4.8% of caregivers did not share troubles or stress with others, because 19% of them believed it was useless except for comfort.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Caregivers’ attitudes toward treatment and caring.

Factors that influence the mental states of caregivers

The screening results of binary logistic regression exploring the relevant factors influencing the positive states of caregivers are shown in Table 4. The major factors that influence caregivers’ positive states were residence (p = 0.009, OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.54–0.91), severity of AD (p < 0.001, OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.58–0.77), perceived efficacy of treatment (p < 0.001, OR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.70–2.28), safety issues after AD dementia diagnosis (p = 0.009, OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57–0.92), and perceived social support (p = 0.001, OR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.27–2.46). Further analyses with factors that influenced the positive states of caregivers were conducted in different stages of AD and found that perceived efficacy of treatment (p < 0.001) was the common factor.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Binary logistic regressions of positive states of caregivers among different stages of AD.

The screening results of binary logistic regression exploring the relevant factors influencing the negative states of caregivers are shown in Table 5. Age (p < 0.001, OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.74–0.90), form of care (p < 0.001, OR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.35–2.92), severity of AD (p < 0.001, OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.23–1.60), perceived efficacy of treatment (p < 0.001, OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.56–0.75), neuropsychiatric symptoms causing stress in caregivers (p < 0.001, OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.13–1.22), safety issues after AD dementia diagnosis (p = 0.004, OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.12–1.83), and perceived social support (p = 0.004, OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.34–0.56) entered the final model among all caregivers. The results of further analyses with factors that influenced the negative states of caregivers among different stages of AD showed that form of care (p > 0.05) was not significant in the mild group, while safety issues after AD dementia diagnosis (p > 0.05) was not significant in the severe group.

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Binary logistic regressions of negative states of caregivers among different stages of AD.

Discussion

AD is the leading cause of disability and dependency among elderly individuals, and the support of mental health for their carers has been underscored (3, 32). This national cross-sectional survey explored the situation of caregivers’ mental states as well as its influencing factors in caring for people with AD with different severities in China. These results hinted at distinctions in both the positive and negative states of caregivers during different stages of AD and further laid the foundation for health workers to provide flexible and sensitive caregiving support services.

Alzheimer’s Disease International (ADI) reported that over 50% of carers globally say their health has suffered as a result of their caring responsibilities even while expressing positive sentiments about their role (33). This proportion of caregivers with negative states was similar to our results in the severe group, while 26.3 and 36.5% of all caregivers had positive and negative states, respectively. Consistent with previous studies (28, 32, 34), time dependency, economic burden and decline of quality life were caregivers’ major predicaments in this study. Therefore, it is urgent to take targeted strategies to promote the positive states of caregivers and reduce their negative states, especially for caregivers of people with severe AD. When caregivers undertake caring responsibilities in different stages of the disease, it is essential to target caregivers’ needs for the provision of flexible and sensitive support (9, 34, 35).

The positive or negative states of caregivers depended on whether the carers could fulfill caregiving demands. Consistent with previous studies (9, 12, 15, 36), the regression analysis of positive and negative states in this study found that the common influencing factors were the severity of AD and perceived social support. Furthermore, the results of this survey detected that the efficacy of treatment and safety issues after AD dementia diagnosis would affect caregivers’ mental status, but the latter made significant differences in the mild-to-moderate group after stratified analysis according to the severity of AD. The efficacy of treatment affects the degree of self-care ability, which is related to the burden of caring tasks in the different stages of AD (3, 37). According to the results of this study, the common security issues were falls, getting lost, and taking the wrong medicine, which might be attributed to the symptoms of AD; however, less than half of caregivers in our survey mastered the methods to prevent accidental injury. The imbalance between care demands and competence promotes negative states and reduces positive states (9, 15). Social and instrumental support, including emotion, social functioning, and nursing skills, could mediate the effects of caregivers’ stressors and consequently arouse distinct mental reactions of caregivers (12, 38). In short, it is worth noting that effective treatment to maintain patients’ activities of daily living and caregiving support from others were essential strategies for caregivers’ mental health. The skills of nursing safety could be reinforced especially among the caregivers of people with mild-to-moderate AD.

To develop targeted strategies for caregivers’ mental health, discrepancies in influencing factors between positive and negative states cannot be ignored. Regarding sociodemographic factors, this study showed that residence was related to caregivers’ positive states, especially in the severe group. More caregivers showed positive states in rural areas, which might be attributed to the patients in rural areas who more frequently participate in nonpharmaceutical therapy. As the previous article described, these nonpharmaceutical activities, including physical activity, mental activity (e.g., chess, mahjong), and musical therapy, were demonstrated to be beneficial for the improvement of cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms (24). On the other hand, caregivers could receive support from health workers and have time for respite during the patients’ participation in nonpharmaceutical treatment. Moreover, in our survey, age and form of care correlated with caregivers’ negative states. Meanwhile, age affected caregivers’ mental states among mild-to-moderate groups, while the form of care influenced their states in moderate-to-severe groups. If patients are older, they might be more dependent, and their caregivers spend more time in daily caring (3, 34). Caregivers more frequently experienced negative states when patients lived in professional institutions, which might be explained by the regional cultural characteristics in China. Traditional cultural heritage, referred to as filial piety, made caregivers feel guilt, as they abandoned their families to nursing homes (6, 21). Guilt presents obstacles for caregivers in acknowledging their value in protecting and maintaining the patient’s wellbeing (6). Thus, to promote positive states, caregivers could facilitate patients’ participation in nonpharmaceutical activities that are conducive to delaying disease progression. However, caregivers of people with moderate-to-severe AD or a lack of self-care ability could ask for professional help when they cannot afford the caring responsibilities and experience negative states. For instance, respite care services and nursing homes are alternative sources for both patients’ and caregivers’ health.

In addition, it is important to note that neuropsychiatric symptoms were only concerned with caregivers’ negative states in this study, regardless of the severity of AD. Previous reviews also agree that patients’ neuropsychiatric symptoms were the main detector of caregiver burden (15, 37). Even though a question remains as to whether certain symptoms are more challenging than others and are more useful indicators of the caregiver’s need for assistance or intervention, the presence of different neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients carries different distress patterns in caregivers (3, 8, 18). This study showed that the main symptoms causing caregiver stress were hyperactivity symptoms in the mild group and physical behavior symptoms in the moderate-to-severe group. A systematic review found that the application of problem-focused and emotion-focused coping strategies could ameliorate caregivers’ negative emotions (39). Jung et al. (10) identified the conceptual model of caregiver competence in managing neuropsychiatric symptoms, which laid the foundation for future education or training programs. In brief, the skills and competence of coping with neuropsychiatric symptoms could be grasped by caregivers for relief from negative states when facing patients’ demands at different stages.

This study was a national survey to explore the status of caregivers’ mental states and its influencing factors among people with different stages of AD. However, the study is not without its limitations. First, we cannot exclude selection bias because only caregivers who had access to our recruitment channels could participate in the survey, and there was a gap between the number of participants recruited in urban and rural areas. Nevertheless, the study population had a broad sociodemographic spectrum, which provides support at least to some extent, for the external validity of our results. Second, recall bias could hardly be excluded, which might affect the reported experiences of caring. Third, this survey adopted self-designed questionnaires that originated from the results of a previous survey and were modified by several specialists. Although the results had restrictions in comparability with studies from other countries, the mental states of carers in China was revealed to pave the way for future management of mental health.

Conclusion

This study in China is the first to feature a large sample to explore the caregivers’ mental states and its influencing factors. To reduce their negative states and promote positive states, flexible and sensitive caregiving support could be built on caregivers’ demands in caring for people with different stages of AD. During the stage of mild-to-moderate AD, caregivers’ skills in nursing safety might be strengthened. When caring for people with moderate-to-severe AD, nonpharmaceutical treatment was regarded as a compensatory method of pharmacotherapy to relieve patients’ neuropsychiatric symptoms, and it was an alternative to receiving institutional care with professional help. In addition, it is important to know that the skills and competence of coping with neuropsychiatric symptoms in all stages of AD are alleviators of the negative states of caregivers.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University First Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

BL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HJ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GY: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. CZ: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. SC: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YW: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. TW: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. QW: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. ZW: Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. YS: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Chinese Academy of Engineering (Strategic research and consulting project), National Key Research and Development Program of China (SQ2018YFC130024), National Major Science and Technology Projects of China (2021ZD0201800 and 2021ZD0201805), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071306).

Acknowledgments

We thank all the patients and their caregivers who participated selflessly and all investigators in sampled hospitals for their collaboration in contact with participants.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The reviewer JX declared a shared parent affiliation with the author YW to the handling editor at the time of review.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. World Health Organization . (2023). Key facts about dementia. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia (Accessed June 1, 2023).

Google Scholar

2. ADI . (2019). World Alzheimer report 2019. Available at: https://www.alz.co.uk/research/world-report-2019 (Accessed September 20, 2019).

Google Scholar

3. Cheng, ST . Dementia caregiver burden: a research update and critical analysis. Curr Psychiatry Rep. (2017) 19:64. doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0818-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Pinquart, M , and Sorensen, S . Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. (2003) 18:250–67. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.250

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Gilhooly, KJ , Gilhooly, ML , Sullivan, MP , McIntyre, A , Wilson, L , Harding, E, et al. A meta-review of stress, coping and interventions in dementia and dementia caregiving. BMC Geriatr. (2016) 16:106. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0280-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Merrilees, J . The impact of dementia on family caregivers: what is research teaching us? Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. (2016) 16:88. doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0692-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Messina, A , Lattanzi, M , Albanese, E , and Fiordelli, M . Caregivers of people with dementia and mental health during COVID-19: findings from a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. (2022) 22:56. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02752-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Storti, LB , Quintino, DT , Silva, NM , Kusumota, L , and Marques, S . Neuropsychiatric symptoms of the elderly with Alzheimer's disease and the family caregivers' distress. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. (2016) 24:e2751. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.0580.2751

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Yu, D , Cheng, ST , and Wang, J . Unravelling positive aspects of caregiving in dementia: an integrative review of research literature. Int J Nurs Stud. (2018) 79:1–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Jung, S , Song, JA , Kim, J , Cheon, H , and Kim, J . Family caregiver competence in managing behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: a concept synthesis. Jpn J Nurs Sci. (2022) 19:e12462. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12462

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Narayan, S , Lewis, M , Tornatore, J , Hepburn, K , and Corcoran-Perry, S . Subjective responses to caregiving for a spouse with dementia. J Gerontol Nurs. (2001) 27:19–28. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-20010301-05

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Rosa, R , Simoes-Neto, JP , Santos, RL , Torres, B , Baptista, M , Kimura, N, et al. Caregivers' resilience in mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease. Aging Ment Health. (2020) 24:250–8. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1533520

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Williams, IC . Emotional health of black and white dementia caregivers: a contextual examination. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. (2005) 60:P287–95. doi: 10.1093/geronb/60.6.p287

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Lazarus, RS , and Folkman, S . Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer (1984).

Google Scholar

15. van der Lee, J , Bakker, TJ , Duivenvoorden, HJ , and Droes, RM . Multivariate models of subjective caregiver burden in dementia: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. (2014) 15:76–93. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2014.03.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Soong, A , Au, ST , Kyaw, BM , Theng, YL , and Tudor, CL . Information needs and information seeking behaviour of people with dementia and their non-professional caregivers: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr. (2020) 20:61. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-1454-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Dauphinot, V , Potashman, M , Levitchi-Benea, M , Su, R , Rubino, I , and Krolak-Salmon, P . Economic and caregiver impact of Alzheimer's disease across the disease spectrum: a cohort study. Alzheimers Res Ther. (2022) 14:34. doi: 10.1186/s13195-022-00969-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Pinyopornpanish, K , Soontornpun, A , Wongpakaran, T , Wongpakaran, N , Tanprawate, S , Pinyopornpanish, K, et al. Impact of behavioral and psychological symptoms of Alzheimer's disease on caregiver outcomes. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:14138. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18470-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Lee, K , Puga, F , Pickering, CEZ , Masoud, SS , and White, CL . Transitioning into the caregiver role following a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease or related dementia: a scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud. (2019) 96:119–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Jia, L , Du, Y , Chu, L , Zhang, Z , Li, F , Lyu, D, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older in China: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Public Health. (2020) 5:e661–71. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30185-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Li, Y , Leng, F , Xiong, Q , Zhou, J , Du, A , Zhu, F, et al. Factors associated with Alzheimer’s disease patients’ caregiving status and family caregiving burden in China. Front Aging Neurosci. (2022) 14:865933. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.865933

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Chunbo, L , Qian, X , Zhiren, S , Qin, Z , Yafei, Y , Fei, H, et al. Real life experience of family caregivers among mild cognitive impairment patients during health care: a qualitative research. Chin J Mod Nurs. (2018) 24:3909–12. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2018.32.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Mei, Z , Tao, L , Xiaozhen, L , Xin, Y , and Huali, W . Comparison and analysis of caregiver burden and associated factors in different stages of cognitive impairment. Chin J Health Manage. (2016) 10:26–30. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-0815.2016.01.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Li, B , Liu, D , Wan, Q , Sheng, C , Wang, X , Leng, F, et al. Differences in treatment for Alzheimer’s disease between urban and rural areas in China. Front Neurol. (2022) 13:996093. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.996093

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. National Health Commission of China . (2020). Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders. Available at: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7653p/202012/a1c4397dbf504e1393b3d2f6c263d782.shtml (Accessed June 15, 2021).

Google Scholar

26. Masami, F , Xiaozhen, L , Tao, L , Xie, T , Huali, W, et al. Caregiver burden and related factors among caregivers of people with diagnosis of Alzheimer disease within one year. Chin Ment Health J. (2020) 34:572–7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2020.7.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. MR Group Of Chinese Radiology, & Chinese Medical Association Beijing Society . Chinese experts consensus on standard of MRI technology of Alzheimer disease. Chin J Radiol. (2019) 53:665–71. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2019.08.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Andren, S , and Elmstahl, S . Relationships between income, subjective health and caregiver burden in caregivers of people with dementia in group living care: a cross-sectional community-based study. Int J Nurs Stud. (2007) 44:435–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Thornton, MA , and Tamir, DI . People represent mental states in terms of rationality, social impact, and valence: validating the 3d mind model. Cortex. (2020) 125:44–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Kaufer, DI , Cummings, JL , Ketchel, P , Smith, V , MacMillan, A , Shelley, T, et al. Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the neuropsychiatric inventory. J Neuropsychiatry Clin. (2000) 12:233–9. doi: 10.1176/jnp.12.2.233

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Kim, B , Noh, GO , and Kim, K . Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in patients with Alzheimer's disease and family caregiver burden: a path analysis. BMC Geriatr. (2021) 21:160. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02109-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Koyama, A , Matsushita, M , Hashimoto, M , Fujise, N , Ishikawa, T , Tanaka, H, et al. Mental health among younger and older caregivers of dementia patients: mental health of dementia caregivers. Psychogeriatrics. (2017) 17:108–14. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. ADI . (2021). Dementia facts & figures. Available at: https://www.alzint.org/about/dementia-facts-figures/ (Accessed June 15, 2021).

Google Scholar

34. Adelman, RD , Tmanova, LL , Delgado, D , Dion, S , and Lachs, MS . Caregiver burden: a clinical review. JAMA. (2014) 311:1052–60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.304

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Peavy, G , Mayo, AM , Avalos, C , Rodriguez, A , Shifflett, B , and Edland, SD . Perceived stress in older dementia caregivers: mediation by loneliness and depression. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Dement. (2022) 37:230423988. doi: 10.1177/15333175211064756

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Ruiz-Fernández, MD , Hernández-Padilla, JM , Ortiz-Amo, R , Fernández-Sola, C , Fernández-Medina, IM , and Granero-Molina, J . Predictor factors of perceived health in family caregivers of people diagnosed with mild or moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:3762. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193762

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Chiao, CY , Wu, HS , and Hsiao, CY . Caregiver burden for informal caregivers of patients with dementia: a systematic review. Int Nurs Rev. (2015) 62:340–50. doi: 10.1111/inr.12194

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Clay, OJ , Roth, DL , Wadley, VG , and Haley, WE . Changes in social support and their impact on psychosocial outcome over a 5 year period for African American and Wite dementia caregivers. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2008) 23:857–62. doi: 10.1002/gps.1996

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Monteiro, A , Santos, RL , Kimura, N , Baptista, M , and Dourado, M . Coping strategies among caregivers of people with Alzheimer disease: a systematic review. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. (2018) 40:258–68. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: dementia, Alzheimer’s, caregivers, mental states, influencing factors, severity of disease

Citation: Li B, Jin H, Yan G, Zhang C, Chen S, Wang Y, Wang T, Wan Q, Wei Z and Sun Y (2024) Mental states in caregivers toward people with Alzheimer’s disease at different stages. Front. Neurol. 14:1327487. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1327487

Received: 25 October 2023; Accepted: 26 December 2023;
Published: 11 January 2024.

Edited by:

Ioannis Liampas, University of Thessaly, Greece

Reviewed by:

Alison Warren, George Washington University, United States
Jun Xu, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China

Copyright © 2024 Li, Jin, Yan, Zhang, Chen, Wang, Wang, Wan, Wei and Sun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yongan Sun, c3lhQGJqbXUuZWR1LmNu; Zhimin Wei, NTE4MDcxMjRAcXEuY29t

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.