Peixin Guo1
Wei Zou2*- 1Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Heilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China
- 2Third Ward of Acupuncture Department, First Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China
Objective: Inflammation participates in the pathology and progression of secondary brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). This meta-analysis intended to explore the prognostic role of inflammatory indexes, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), white blood cell (WBC), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in ICH patients.
Methods: Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched until June 2023. Two outcomes, including poor outcome and mortality were extracted and measured. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were presented for outcome assessment.
Results: Forty-six studies with 25,928 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The high level of NLR [OR (95% CI): 1.20 (1.13–1.27), p < 0.001], WBC [OR (95% CI): 1.11 (1.02–1.21), p = 0.013], and CRP [OR (95% CI): 1.29 (1.08–1.54), p = 0.005] were related to poor outcome in ICH patients. Additionally, the high level of NLR [OR (95% CI): 1.06 (1.02–1.10), p = 0.001], WBC [OR (95% CI): 1.39 (1.16–1.66), p < 0.001], and CRP [OR (95% CI): 1.02 (1.01–1.04), p = 0.009] were correlated with increased mortality in ICH patients. Nevertheless, PLR was not associated with poor outcome [OR (95% CI): 1.00 (0.99–1.01), p = 0.749] or mortality [OR (95% CI): 1.00 (0.99–1.01), p = 0.750] in ICH patients. The total score of risk of bias assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria ranged from 7–9, which indicated the low risk of bias in the included studies. Publication bias was low, and stability assessed by sensitivity analysis was good.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis summarizes that the high level of NLR, WBC, and CRP estimates poor outcome and higher mortality in ICH patients.
1 Introduction
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the second most common type of stroke, which accounts for approximately 27.9% of all incident strokes (1, 2). The global incidence of ICH ranges from 27 to 30 per 100,000 person-years, and the predominant risk factors for ICH include hypertension, coagulopathy, alcohol abuse, diabetes mellitus, smoking, etc. (3–5). Currently, several treatment strategies have been developed to treat ICH patients, such as surgery, blood pressure control, and hemostatic therapy; these therapeutic strategies have made non-negligible progress in treating ICH patients (6–8). Unfortunately, there is no single treatment that effectively improves the prognosis of these patients (9). It is estimated that the mortality after ICH is around 30 to 40% within the first month, and it is approximately 50% within 1 year (10–13). In addition, most patients experience functional decline, and only 12 to 39% of ICH patients achieve long-term functional independence (10, 14, 15). Therefore, identifying potential prognostic factors may be meaningful to enhance the management of ICH patients.
Neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets, and CRP play a fundamental role in regulating inflammation after ICH, which would further aggravate brain injury and lead to a poor prognosis (16–23). For instance, neutrophils are the first leukocyte subtype to infiltrate into the brain after ICH, which facilitates brain injury by producing reactive oxygen species and releasing proinflammatory cytokines (19). Regarding lymphocytes, ICH would increase catecholamine and steroids to induce lymphocytopenia, which contributes to immunosuppression and aggravates brain injury (20). Besides, platelets are activated after ICH, then they could interact with macrophages to facilitate the production of proinflammatory cytokines, aggravating the brain injury (21). Moreover, C-reactive protein (CPR) could facilitate the production of inflammatory cytokines and induce blood–brain barrier disruption to aggravate inflammation and brain injury (22, 23). Considering their close engagement in ICH, it might be meaningful to explore the prognostic values of relevant inflammatory indicators, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), white blood cell (WBC), and CPR in ICH patients (24–27).
One previous study indicates that the high level of NLR is correlated with poor outcome in ICH patients (27). Meanwhile, another study elucidates that the high level of PLR predicts poor outcome, but it cannot estimate mortality in ICH patients (26). Regarding the high level of WBC, it could forecast increased mortality and poor outcome in ICH patients (25). Furthermore, the high level of CRP is associated with elevated mortality and poor outcomes in ICH patients (24). Notably, one recently published meta-analysis has revealed the prognostic role of NLR for ICH patients, which discovers that NLR is correlated with a poor outcome and mortality in ICH patients (28). However, the most recent articles included in this previous meta-analysis are published in 2021, and some updated relevant studies should be considered (28). On the other hand, the previous meta-analysis mainly focuses on the prognostic effect of NLR for ICH patients (28), and whether other inflammatory markers have the same prognostic implication should be further investigated. Accordingly, this meta-analysis enrolled some up-to-date studies and aimed to explore the predictive role of NLR, PLR, WBC, and CRP for poor outcome and mortality in ICH patients.
2 Methods
2.1 Data sources and searches
Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched until June 2023 using the following keywords or a term of their combination: ‘neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio’, ‘neutrophil lymphocyte ratio’, ‘neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio’, ‘neutrophil/lymphocyte’, ‘neutrophil-lymphocyte’, ‘NLR’, ‘platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio’, ‘platelet lymphocyte ratio’, ‘platelet to lymphocyte ratio’, ‘platelet/lymphocyte’, ‘platelet-lymphocyte’, ‘PLR’, ‘C-reactive protein’, ‘CRP’, ‘inflammation’, ‘WBC’, ‘WCC’, ‘white cell count’, ‘white blood cell’, ‘leukocyte’, ‘ICH’, ‘intracerebral hemorrhage’, ‘intracranial hemorrhage’, ‘cerebral hemorrhage’, and ‘brain hemorrhage’. The PICOS (Participants, Intervention/exposure, Comparison, Outcomes, Study design) criteria were used to structure this meta-analysis (29). (i) Patients (P): patients diagnosed with ICH. (ii) Intervention (I): patients with a high level of NLR, PLR, WBC, and CRP. (iii) Control (C): patients with a low level of NLR, PLR, WBC, and CRP. (iv) Outcomes (O): poor outcome and mortality. (v) Study design: observational studies.
2.2 Outcomes
In this meta-analysis, two outcomes were measured including poor outcome and mortality. Specifically, poor outcome was defined as recording a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score > 2 and/or a Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) score < 4 during the follow-up; and mortality was defined as any cause-death during the follow-up.
2.3 Identification criteria
Studies met the following criteria were included: (i) patients diagnosed with ICH; (ii) patients aged more than 18 years; (iii) studies reported inflammation indexes, which contained NLR, PLR, WBC, and CPR (at least one involved); (iv) studies reported multivariate analysis results for outcomes, which contained odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). The exclusion criteria were: (i) meeting abstract, letter to the editor, case report, or animal study; (ii) with the non-accessible full-text article; (iii) studies were not English language published. Studies were identified by two independent reviewers (Guo and Zou) in accordance with the above criteria. Disagreements were solved by a consensus of the above two reviewers.
2.4 Data extraction and quality assessment
Year, first author, country, study design, number and sex ratio, age, sample time, follow-up period, inflammation indexes, and outcomes were extracted from included studies. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) (upper limit, 9; ≥6, high-quality) (30). Besides, data extraction and quality assessment were completed by two independent reviewers (Guo and Zou).
2.5 Statistics
The OR with 95% CI related to inflammation indexes and outcomes was calculated. In a meta-analysis, the differences in study design, population, and measurements across different studies were referred to as heterogeneity. For heterogeneity assessment, I2 test and Q test were used. I2 represented the ratio of studies heterogeneity to total variation; while Q followed a χ2 distribution with k-1 degrees of freedom. The range of I2 values varied from 0 to 100%, with higher values indicating greater heterogeneity. I2 > 50.0% and p < 0.05 ( ) were considered as heterogeneity existed, and the random-effect model was used; otherwise, the fixed-effect model was used. Publication bias was shown via Deeks’ funnel plots (Begg’s test). The funnel plots determined the presence or absence of publication bias in meta-analysis based on the degree of asymmetry of the graph. The p value of Begg’s test less than 0.05 indicated publication bias existed. If there was a risk of bias, trim and fill analysis was used for further investigation. Sensitivity analysis was used to assess the robustness and reliability of the results by using the leave-one-out approach. If the results of model remain unchanged after sensitivity analysis, the results were reliable. Stata v.14.0 (Stata Corp, USA) was used, and p < 0.05 indicated significance.
3 Results
3.1 Study screening procedure
A total of 5,081 studies were identified from the electronic base, including 2,182 studies from Embase, 1794 studies from PubMed, 1,019 studies from Web of Science, and 86 studies from Cochrane Library. Then 4,270 duplicate studies were excluded, and the rest 811 studies were screened based on the title and abstract read. After that, 747 studies were further excluded, including 651 studies that were mismatched to inflammation indexes or outcomes, 89 meta-analyses, and 7 case reports or animal studies. Subsequently, 64 studies were screened based on full-text read, and 18 studies were excluded, including 13 studies without multivariate analysis results and 5 meeting abstracts or letters to the editor. Ultimately, 46 studies were included in this meta-analysis (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Study flow.
3.2 Features of included studies
The included studies were published from 2009 to 2023, which contained a total of 25,928 patients (24–27, 31–72). Twenty-five studies were conducted in China, 4 studies were conducted in Italy, 4 studies were conducted in the United States of America (USA), 3 studies were conducted in Germany, 2 studies were conducted in Korea, and the other studies were conducted in Bulgaria, Spain, Finland, Portugal, Romania, Turkey, Tunisia, and India, respectively. The follow-up duration ranged from 30 days to 1 year. The detailed information of the included studies is shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Included studies.
3.3 NLR for predicting poor outcome and mortality
A total of 22 studies reported NLR for predicting poor outcome, and heterogeneity existed among these studies (I2 = 84.1%, p < 0.001). The pooled analysis disclosed that the high level of NLR was related to poor outcome in ICH patients [OR (95% CI): 1.20 (1.13–1.27), p < 0.001] (Figure 2A). In terms of mortality, 18 studies reported the association of NLR with mortality, and heterogeneity existed among these studies (I2 = 80.0%, p < 0.001). The pooled analysis suggested that the high level of NLR was linked with increased mortality in ICH patients [OR (95% CI): 1.06 (1.02–1.10), p = 0.001] (Figure 2B). Two studies clearly indicated that they excluded aneurysmal cerebral hemorrhage patients. Thus, a subgroup analysis was carried out based on these 2 studies. It was found that no heterogeneity existed between these 2 studies (I2 = 67.6%, p = 0.079). The pooled analysis discovered that the high level of NLR showed a trend to correlate with increased mortality in ICH patients, but it did not achieve statistical significance [OR (95% CI): 1.11 (0.99, 1.23), p = 0.065] (Supplementary Figure S1).
Figure 2. Forest plot of NLR for predicting poor outcome and mortality in ICH patients. Correlation of NLR with poor outcome (A) and mortality (B) in ICH patients.
3.4 PLR for predicting poor outcome and mortality
There were 4 studies that reported PLR for predicting poor outcome. Heterogeneity existed among these studies (I2 = 77.3%, p = 0.004). According to the pooled analysis, PLR was not associated with poor outcome in ICH patients [OR (95% CI): 1.00 (0.99, 1.01), p = 0.749] (Figure 3A). In addition, 2 studies reported PLR for predicting mortality, and there was no heterogeneity existed among these studies (I2 = 55.7%, p = 0.133). Notably, the pooled analysis showed that PLR was also not correlated with mortality in ICH patients [OR (95% CI): 1.00 (0.99, 1.01), p = 0.750] (Figure 3B).
Figure 3. Forest plot of PLR for predicting poor outcome and mortality in ICH patients. Association of PLR with poor outcome (A) and mortality (B) in ICH patients.
3.5 WBC for predicting poor outcome and mortality
WBC for estimating poor outcome was reported in 11 studies, and heterogeneity existed among these studies (I2 = 76.4%, p < 0.001). The pooled analysis exhibited that the high level of WBC was linked with poor outcome in ICH patients [OR (95% CI): 1.11 (1.02, 1.21), p = 0.013] (Figure 4A). Regarding WBC for predicting mortality, 10 studies reported that. Heterogeneity existed among these studies (I2 = 82.5%, p < 0.001). After conducting the pooled analysis, it was discovered that the high level of WBC was linked to increased mortality in ICH patients [OR (95% CI): 1.39 (1.16, 1.66), p < 0.001] (Figure 4B).
Figure 4. Forest plot of WBC for predicting poor outcome and mortality in ICH patients. Relationship of WBC with poor outcome (A) and mortality (B) in ICH patients.
3.6 CRP for predicting poor outcome and mortality
A total of 6 studies reported CRP for predicting poor outcome, and heterogeneity existed among these studies (I2 = 84.5%, p < 0.001). The pooled analysis indicated that the high level of CRP was correlated with poor outcome in ICH patients [OR (95% CI): 1.29 (1.08, 1.54), p = 0.005] (Figure 5A). Moreover, 10 studies reported CRP for forecasting mortality. Heterogeneity existed among these studies (I2 = 76.3%, p < 0.001). The pooled analysis disclosed that CRP was associated with raised mortality in ICH patients [OR (95% CI): 1.02 (1.01, 1.04), p = 0.009] (Figure 5B).
Figure 5. Forest plot of CRP for predicting poor outcome and mortality in ICH patients. Relationship of CRP with poor outcome (A) and mortality (B) in ICH patients.
3.7 Sensitivity analysis and quality assessment
Sensitivity analysis disclosed that omitting Fonseca would affect the result of PLR for estimating mortality. Apart from that, omitting any of a single study would not influence the results of the pooled analysis, which indicated the stability of this meta-analysis (Supplementary Table S1).
The included studies were evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria, and the total score of bias risk of each study ranged from 7–9, which indicated the low risk of bias in the included studies (Table 2).
Table 2. Quality assessment by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria.
3.8 Subgroup analysis for poor outcome based on study type and follow-up duration
The pooled analysis suggested that the high level of NLR was related to poor outcome in retrospective studies [OR (95% CI): 1.22 (1.14, 1.31), p < 0.001], studies with a follow-up duration of <90 days [OR (95% CI): 1.23 (1.08, 1.40), p = 0.002], and studies with a follow-up duration of ≥90 days [OR (95% CI): 1.20 (1.11, 1.29), p < 0.001]. Heterogeneity existed among these studies that reported NLR for predicting poor outcome (all I2 > 50.0%, p < 0.001) (Table 3).
Table 3. Subgroup analysis of the association of inflammation indexes with poor outcome.
No correlation was found between PLR and poor outcome in retrospective studies and studies with a follow-up duration of ≥90 days (both p > 0.05) (Table 3).
The pooled analysis disclosed that the high level of WBC was correlated with poor outcome in retrospective studies [OR (95% CI): 1.13 (1.02, 1.25), p = 0.018] and studies with a follow-up duration of ≥90 days [OR (95% CI): 1.15 (1.02, 1.30), p = 0.021]. Heterogeneity existed among these studies that reported WBC for estimating poor outcome (both I2 > 50.0%, p < 0.001) (Table 3).
The pooled analysis displayed that the high level of CRP was associated with poor outcome in prospective studies [OR (95% CI): 1.22 (1.10, 1.35), p < 0.001] without heterogeneity among these studies (I2 = 36.8%, p = 0.205). In studies with a follow-up duration of ≥90 days, the high level of CRP was associated with poor outcome [OR (95% CI): 1.23 (1.03, 1.47), p = 0.019] with heterogeneity among these studies (I2 = 81.6%, p < 0.001) (Table 3).
3.9 Subgroup analysis for mortality based on study type and follow-up duration
The pooled analysis revealed that the high level of NLR was related to increased mortality in retrospective studies [OR (95% CI): 1.05 (1.02, 1.09), p = 0.007], prospective studies [OR (95% CI): 1.16 (1.08, 1.24), p < 0.001], studies with a follow-up duration of <90 days [OR (95% CI): 1.05 (1.01, 1.10), p = 0.021], and studies with a follow-up duration of≥90 days [OR (95% CI): 1.15 (1.03, 1.28), p = 0.012]. In terms of NLR for predicting mortality, heterogeneity existed among retrospective studies, studies with a follow-up duration of <90 days, and studies with a follow-up duration of≥90 days (all I2 > 50.0%, p < 0.001); heterogeneity did not exist in prospective studies (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.651) (Table 4).
Table 4. Subgroup analysis of the association of inflammation indexes with mortality.
No correlation was found between PLR and mortality in studies with follow-up duration of <90 days (p > 0.05) (Table 4).
The pooled analysis disclosed that the high level of WBC was correlated with raised mortality in retrospective studies [OR (95% CI): 1.36 (1.14, 1.63), p = 0.001], studies with a follow-up duration of <90 days [OR (95% CI): 1.25 (1.11, 1.40), p < 0.001], and studies with a follow-up duration of ≥90 days [OR (95% CI): 1.51 (1.11, 2.04), p = 0.008]. Regarding WBC for forecasting mortality, heterogeneity existed among retrospective studies and studies with a follow-up duration of ≥90 days (both I2 > 50.0%, p < 0.001). But it did not exist in studies with a follow-up duration of <90 days (I2 = 13.1%, p = 0.331) (Table 4).
The pooled analysis showed that the high level of CRP was associated with elevated mortality in retrospective studies [OR (95% CI): 1.02 (1.00, 1.03), p = 0.032] and studies with a follow-up duration of <90 days [OR (95% CI): 1.02 (1.00, 1.04), p = 0.017]. Heterogeneity existed among these studies that reported CRP for estimating mortality (both I2 > 50.0%, p < 0.01) (Table 4).
3.10 Subgroup analysis for the association between NLR and poor outcome based on sampling time
In studies with a sampling time at admission, 20 studies reported NLR for predicting poor outcome, and heterogeneity existed among these studies (I2 = 84.4%, p < 0.001). The random effect model exhibited that the high level of NLR was correlated with poor outcome [OR (95% CI): 1.19 (1.12, 1.27), p < 0.001]. In studies with a sampling time within 48 h after surgery, 2 studies reported NLR for predicting poor outcome, and there was no heterogeneity in these studies (I2 = 58.2%, p = 0.122). The random effect model suggested that the high level of NLR was related to a poor outcome [OR (95% CI): 1.24 (1.06, 1.44), p = 0.007] (Supplementary Table S2).
3.11 Publication bias
Funnel plots suggested that there might be a potential publication bias in NLR for predicting poor outcome (Figure 6A). However, publication bias might not exist in PLR (Figure 6B) and WBC (Figure 6C) for estimating poor outcome. Notably, potential publication bias might also exist in CRP for forecasting poor outcome (Figure 6D). In terms of mortality, NLR (Figure 6E), PLR (Figure 6F), and WBC (Figure 6G) for predicting mortality might have a low risk of publication bias. However, CRP for estimating mortality might have a high risk of publication bias (Figure 6H). Begg’s test disclosed that only NLR for predicting poor outcome (p < 0.001) and CRP for predicting mortality (p = 0.007) existed publication bias. Subsequently, the trim-and-filling method was applied to validate the stability, and it was found that the OR (95% CI) of NLR for estimating poor outcome before and after filling imputed missing studies was 0.07 (0.05–0.09) (p < 0.001) and 1.05 (1.03–1.07) (p < 0.001), which indicated the model was robust. Meanwhile, the OR (95% CI) of CRP for estimating mortality before and after filling imputed missing studies was 0.01 (0.01–0.02) (p < 0.001) and 1.01 (1.01–1.02) (p < 0.001), which indicated the model was stable.
Figure 6. Funnel plot for publication bias. Funnel plot of NLR (A), PLR (B), WBC (C), and CRP (D) for predicting poor outcome in ICH patients. Funnel plot of NLR (E), PLR (F), WBC (G), and CRP (H) for predicting mortality in ICH patients.
4 Discussion
Aggravated inflammation facilitates the progression of secondary brain injury, which may ultimately contribute to poor outcome in ICH patients (16). In this meta-analysis, it was discovered that the high level of NLR, WBC, and CRP were related to poor outcome in ICH patients. The potential reasons might be that: (1) after ICH, the neutrophils would rapidly reach the hemorrhage site and infiltrate the brain parenchyma, which impaired the blood–brain barrier and led to neurological injury, thereby resulting in poor outcome (16). In addition, the inflammatory response following ICH would further interfere with the function of the innate and adaptive immune cells, which might lead to adaptive immunosuppression (73–75). (2) increased leukocytes could also facilitate the neurotoxicity through production of matrix metalloproteinases, reactive oxygen species, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, which further contributed brain injury (19). (3) CRP could activate the complement cascade and microglia, and promote the release of proinflammatory cytokines to aggravate secondary brain injury, which ultimately contributed to poor outcome (17, 76, 77). Taken together, considering the involvement of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and CRP in the brain injury after ICH, NLR, WBC, and CRP might have the ability to predict the poor outcome. Notably, heterogeneity existed among the studies that reported the correlation of NLR, WBC, and CRP with poor outcome in ICH patients. Therefore, the findings of this meta-analysis needed further validation.
Some studies also disclose the role of NLR, PLR, WBC, and CRP in forecasting mortality in ICH patients (25, 26, 33, 47). For instance, the high level of NLR independently predicts higher mortality in ICH patients (47). Meanwhile, the high level of WBC is also independently linked with increased mortality in ICH patients (25). Furthermore, another study indicates that the high level of CRP can estimate elevated mortality in ICH patients (33). However, one study figures out that PLR lacks the ability to predict mortality in ICH patients (26). In this meta-analysis, it was found that the high level of NLR, WBC, and CRP were correlated with increased mortality in ICH patients. The possible reasons might be that: (1) following ICH, neutrophils would impair the blood–brain barrier and induce neurological injury, which might further induce temporary immune suppression and lead to lymphocytopenia (16, 74, 78). Subsequently, lymphocytopenia would increase the risk of infection, which was responsible for mortality (73, 79). Therefore, the high level of NLR predicted elevated mortality in ICH patients. (2) the high level of NLR, WBC, and CRP could reflect exacerbated inflammatory status, and aggravated inflammation could facilitate hematoma expansion after ICH (80, 81). Then the expanded hematoma would further lead to intracranial hypertension, resulting in mortality (81). Conclusively, the high level of NLR, WBC, and CRP predicted raised mortality in ICH patients.
Further subgroup analysis discovered that in retrospective studies, the high level of NLP and WBC were related to poor outcome; meanwhile, the high level of NLR, WBC, and CRP were correlated with increased mortality in ICH patients. However, in prospective studies, only the high level of CRP estimated poor outcome, and only the high level of NLR predicted elevated mortality in ICH patients. A possible reason would be that selection bias and information bias would exist in retrospective studies, which might influence the prognostic effect of these inflammatory indexes (82, 83). Therefore, the findings of this meta-analysis should be read with caution, and more solid evidence was required. Apart from study design, subgroup analysis based on follow-up duration disclosed that in studies with a follow-up duration of ≥90 days, the high level of NLR, WBC, and CRP was related to poor outcome; the high level of NLR and WBC was correlated with increased mortality in ICH patients. In studies with a follow-up duration of <90 days, only the high level of NLR was linked to poor outcome, and the high level of NLR, WBC, and CRP was linked with raised mortality in ICH patients. A potential reason might be that aggravated inflammation after ICH might sustainably degrade immune resilience over time, which increased the risk of infection and obstructed the recovery from the disease, contributing to a poor outcome and increased mortality (84, 85). Considering that the longer follow-up duration might more objectively reflect the prognosis of ICH patients, it was speculated that the high level of NLR, WBC, and CRP had a good ability to predict poor outcome, and the high level of NLR and WBC could estimate increased mortality in ICH patients. However, more evidence was required to validate this speculation. Notably, limited by the number of studies, whether the prognostic effect of PLR and CRP would be affected by follow-up duration should be further studied. In addition, other factors, such as hematoma size, surgery, co-infections, etc., might also affect the prognosis of ICH patients, which could be a study direction for subsequent studies. Moreover, this meta-analysis also discovered that in studies with a sampling time at admission and within 48 h after surgery, the high level of NLR was correlated with poor outcome. Based on this finding, it was speculated that the ability of NLR to predict poor outcome in ICH patients was not affected by the sampling times. However, limited by the sample size of this meta-analysis, the number of studies that could be included in the subgroup analysis was small, especially for the studies in which the sampling times were not at admission. Therefore, the findings of this meta-analysis should be further validated.
Limitations could not be omitted in this meta-analysis. Firstly, the regions of the included studies differed, and most included studies were conducted in China. Thus, the generalization of the findings of this meta-analysis should be validated. Secondly, some studies had different sampling times, which might affect the results. Thirdly, many screened studies had a retrospective design; thus, selection bias and information bias might exist. Fourthly, some factors, such as sampling time and follow-up duration, would affect the role of PLR in predicting the prognosis of ICH patients. In addition, the number of studies that reported PLR for predicting poor outcome (N = 4) and mortality (N = 2) in ICH patients was relatively small, which limited the statistical power and the conduction of relevant subgroup analyses. Therefore, more evidence was required to validate the prognostic implication of PLR in ICH patients. Fifthly, aneurysmal cerebral hemorrhage should be excluded due to differences in etiology. However, only Radu and Kim clearly indicated that they excluded aneurysmal cerebral hemorrhage patients, while other studies did not provide this information. Therefore, the findings of this meta-analysis should be further validated.
This meta-analysis concludes that the high level of NLR, WBC, and CRP estimates poor outcome and elevated mortality in ICH patients. Although these indexes are dynamically changing, in our opinion, their variation is still within an abnormal range. Therefore, the high level of NLR, WBC, and CRP could still indicate aggravated inflammation after ICH. Clinically, given that the detection of NLR, WBC, and CRP is simple and the high level of these indexes may provide prognostic information of ICH patients, the detection of these indexes should be widely applied in ICH patients. In addition, considering the high level of NLR, WBC, and CRP could reflect aggravated inflammation, acute interventions that target inflammation may help to improve the prognosis of ICH patients.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
PG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. WZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1288377/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Puy, L, Parry-Jones, AR, Sandset, EC, Dowlatshahi, D, Ziai, W, and Cordonnier, C. Intracerebral haemorrhage. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2023) 9:14. doi: 10.1038/s41572-023-00424-7
2. Collaborators GBDS . Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Neurol. (2021) 20:795–820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0
3. Magid-Bernstein, J, Girard, R, Polster, S, Srinath, A, Romanos, S, Awad, IA, et al. Cerebral hemorrhage: pathophysiology, treatment, and future directions. Circ Res. (2022) 130:1204–29. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319949
4. Li, X, Zhang, L, Wolfe, CDA, and Wang, Y. Incidence and Long-term survival of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage over time: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Front Neurol. (2022) 13:819737. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.819737
5. Wang, S, Zou, XL, Wu, LX, Zhou, HF, Xiao, L, Yao, T, et al. Epidemiology of intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. (2022) 13:915813. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.915813
6. Parry-Jones, AR, Moullaali, TJ, and Ziai, WC. Treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage: from specific interventions to bundles of care. Int J Stroke. (2020) 15:945–53. doi: 10.1177/1747493020964663
7. Schrag, M, and Kirshner, H. Management of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: JACC focus seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2020) 75:1819–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.066
8. Zhao, W, Wu, C, Stone, C, Ding, Y, and Ji, X. Treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage: current approaches and future directions. J Neurol Sci. (2020) 416:117020. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117020
9. Hostettler, IC, Seiffge, DJ, and Werring, DJ. Intracerebral hemorrhage: an update on diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother. (2019) 19:679–94. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2019.1623671
10. An, SJ, Kim, TJ, and Yoon, BW. Epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical features of intracerebral hemorrhage: An update. J Stroke. (2017) 19:3–10. doi: 10.5853/jos.2016.00864
11. Pasi, M, Casolla, B, Kyheng, M, Boulouis, G, Kuchcinski, G, Moulin, S, et al. Long-term mortality in survivors of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Int J Stroke. (2021) 16:448–55. doi: 10.1177/1747493020954946
12. Poon, MT, Fonville, AF, and Al-Shahi, SR. Long-term prognosis after intracerebral haemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2014) 85:660–7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306476
13. Fernando, SM, Qureshi, D, Talarico, R, Tanuseputro, P, Dowlatshahi, D, Sood, MM, et al. Intracerebral hemorrhage incidence, mortality, and association with Oral anticoagulation use: a population study. Stroke. (2021) 52:1673–81. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032550
14. Pasi, M, Casolla, B, Kyheng, M, Boulouis, G, Kuchcinski, G, Moulin, S, et al. Long-term functional decline of spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage survivors. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2021) 92:249–54. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-324741
15. Pinho, J, Costa, AS, Araujo, JM, Amorim, JM, and Ferreira, C. Intracerebral hemorrhage outcome: a comprehensive update. J Neurol Sci. (2019) 398:54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.01.013
16. Chen, S, Li, L, Peng, C, Bian, C, Ocak, PE, Zhang, JH, et al. Targeting oxidative stress and inflammatory response for blood-brain barrier protection in intracerebral hemorrhage. Antioxid Redox Signal. (2022) 37:115–34. doi: 10.1089/ars.2021.0072
17. Zhu, H, Wang, Z, Yu, J, Yang, X, He, F, Liu, Z, et al. Role and mechanisms of cytokines in the secondary brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage. Prog Neurobiol. (2019) 178:101610. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.03.003
18. Wang, J, Du, Y, Wang, A, Zhang, X, Bian, L, Lu, J, et al. Systemic inflammation and immune index predicting outcomes in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurol Sci. (2023) 44:2443–53. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06632-z
19. Nguyen, HX, O'Barr, TJ, and Anderson, AJ. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes promote neurotoxicity through release of matrix metalloproteinases, reactive oxygen species, and TNF-alpha. J Neurochem. (2007) 102:900–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04643.x
20. Prass, K, Meisel, C, Hoflich, C, Braun, J, Halle, E, Wolf, T, et al. Stroke-induced immunodeficiency promotes spontaneous bacterial infections and is mediated by sympathetic activation reversal by poststroke T helper cell type 1-like immunostimulation. J Exp Med. (2003) 198:725–36. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021098
21. Scull, CM, Hays, WD, and Fischer, TH. Macrophage pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion is enhanced following interaction with autologous platelets. J Inflamm (Lond). (2010) 7:53. doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-7-53
22. Kuhlmann, CR, Librizzi, L, Closhen, D, Pflanzner, T, Lessmann, V, Pietrzik, CU, et al. Mechanisms of C-reactive protein-induced blood-brain barrier disruption. Stroke. (2009) 40:1458–66. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.535930
23. Juma, WM, Lira, A, Marzuk, A, Marzuk, Z, Hakim, AM, and Thompson, CS. C-reactive protein expression in a rodent model of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. Brain Res. (2011) 1414:85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.07.047
24. Yan, XJ, Yu, GF, Jie, YQ, Fan, XF, Huang, Q, and Dai, WM. Role of galectin-3 in plasma as a predictive biomarker of outcome after acute intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci. (2016) 368:121–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.06.071
25. Tao, C, Hu, X, Wang, J, Ma, J, Li, H, and You, C. Admission neutrophil count and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predict 90-day outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage. Biomark Med. (2017) 11:33–42. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2016-0187
26. Fonseca, S, Costa, F, Seabra, M, Dias, R, Soares, A, Dias, C, et al. Systemic inflammation status at admission affects the outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage by increasing perihematomal edema but not the hematoma growth. Acta Neurol Belg. (2021) 121:649–59. doi: 10.1007/s13760-019-01269-2
27. Zhao, Y, Xie, Y, Li, S, and Hu, M. The predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio on 30-day outcomes in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patients after surgical treatment: a retrospective analysis of 128 patients. Front Neurol. (2022) 13:963397. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.963397
28. Shi, M, Li, XF, Zhang, TB, Tang, QW, Peng, M, and Zhao, WY. Prognostic role of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Front Neurosci. (2022) 16:825859. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.825859
29. Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Kunz, R, Atkins, D, Brozek, J, Vist, G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. (2011) 64:395–400. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012
30. Stang, A . Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. (2010) 25:603–5. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z
31. Diedler, J, Sykora, M, Hahn, P, Rupp, A, Rocco, A, Herweh, C, et al. C-reactive-protein levels associated with infection predict short- and long-term outcome after supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2009) 27:272–9. doi: 10.1159/000199465
32. Alexandrova, ML, and Danovska, MP. Serum C-reactive protein and lipid hydroperoxides in predicting short-term clinical outcome after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci. (2011) 18:247–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.07.125
33. Di Napoli, M, Godoy, DA, Campi, V, del Valle, M, Pinero, G, Mirofsky, M, et al. C-reactive protein level measurement improves mortality prediction when added to the spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage score. Stroke. (2011) 42:1230–6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.604983
34. Rodriguez-Yanez, M, Brea, D, Arias, S, Blanco, M, Pumar, JM, Castillo, J, et al. Increased expression of toll-like receptors 2 and 4 is associated with poor outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neuroimmunol. (2012) 247:75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2012.03.019
35. Lopponen, P, Qian, C, Tetri, S, Juvela, S, Huhtakangas, J, Bode, MK, et al. Predictive value of C-reactive protein for the outcome after primary intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. (2014) 121:1374–9. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132678
36. Adeoye, O, Walsh, K, Woo, JG, Haverbusch, M, Moomaw, CJ, Broderick, JP, et al. Peripheral monocyte count is associated with case fatality after intracerebral hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2014) 23:e107–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.09.006
37. Walsh, KB, Sekar, P, Langefeld, CD, Moomaw, CJ, Elkind, MS, Boehme, AK, et al. Monocyte count and 30-day case fatality in intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. (2015) 46:2302–4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009880
38. Yu, S, Arima, H, Heeley, E, Delcourt, C, Krause, M, Peng, B, et al. White blood cell count and clinical outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage: the INTERACT2 trial. J Neurol Sci. (2016) 361:112–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.12.033
39. Lattanzi, S, Cagnetti, C, Provinciali, L, and Silvestrini, M. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts the outcome of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. (2016) 47:1654–7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013627
40. Wang, F, Hu, S, Ding, Y, Ju, X, Wang, L, Lu, Q, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and 30-day mortality in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2016) 25:182–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.013
41. Giede-Jeppe, A, Bobinger, T, Gerner, ST, Sembill, JA, Sprugel, MI, Beuscher, VD, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is an independent predictor for in-hospital mortality in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2017) 44:26–34. doi: 10.1159/000468996
42. Sun, Y, You, S, Zhong, C, Huang, Z, Hu, L, Zhang, X, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and the hematoma volume and stroke severity in acute intracerebral hemorrhage patients. Am J Emerg Med. (2017) 35:429–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.11.037
43. Bolayir, A, Cigdem, B, Gokce, SF, Bolayir, HA, Kayim Yildiz, O, Bolayir, E, et al. The effect of Eosinopenia on mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2017) 26:2248–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.05.007
44. Elhechmi, YZ, Hassouna, M, Cherif, MA, Ben Kaddour, R, Sedghiani, I, and Jerbi, Z. Prognostic value of serum C-reactive protein in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: when should we take the sample? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2017) 26:1007–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.11.129
45. Lattanzi, S, Cagnetti, C, Rinaldi, C, Angelocola, S, Provinciali, L, and Silvestrini, M. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio improves outcome prediction of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci. (2018) 387:98–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.01.038
46. Fan, Z, Hao, L, Chuanyuan, T, Jun, Z, Xin, H, Sen, L, et al. Neutrophil and platelet to lymphocyte ratios in associating with blood glucose admission predict the functional outcomes of patients with primary brainstem hemorrhage. World Neurosurg. (2018) 116:e100–7. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.089
47. Wang, F, Wang, L, Jiang, TT, Xia, JJ, Xu, F, Shen, LJ, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is an independent predictor of 30-day mortality of intracerebral hemorrhage patients: a validation cohort study. Neurotox Res. (2018) 34:347–52. doi: 10.1007/s12640-018-9890-6
48. Qi, H, Wang, D, Deng, X, and Pang, X. Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is an independent predictor for neurological deterioration and 90-day mortality in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Med Sci Monit. (2018) 24:9282–91. doi: 10.12659/MSM.911645
49. Zhang, F, Tao, C, Hu, X, Qian, J, Li, X, You, C, et al. Association of Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio on 90-day functional outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage undergoing surgical treatment. World Neurosurg. (2018) 119:e956–61. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.010
50. Guo, R, Wu, Y, Chen, R, Yu, Z, You, C, Ma, L, et al. Clinical value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in primary intraventricular hemorrhage. World Neurosurg. (2019) 127:e1051–6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.040
51. Qin, J, Li, Z, Gong, G, Li, H, Chen, L, Song, B, et al. Early increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with poor 3-month outcomes in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. PLoS One. (2019) 14:e0211833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211833
52. Wang, F, Xu, F, Quan, Y, Wang, L, Xia, JJ, Jiang, TT, et al. Early increase of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts 30-day mortality in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. CNS Neurosci Ther. (2019) 25:30–5. doi: 10.1111/cns.12977
53. Zhang, F, Ren, Y, Fu, W, Wang, Y, Qian, J, Tao, C, et al. Association between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and blood glucose level at admission in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:15623. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52214-5
54. Zhang, F, Ren, Y, Fu, W, Yang, Z, Wen, D, Hu, X, et al. Predictive accuracy of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on Long-term outcome in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. World Neurosurg. (2019) 125:e651–7. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.143
55. Zhang, F, Ren, Y, Shi, Y, Fu, W, Tao, C, Li, X, et al. Predictive ability of admission neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio on short-term outcome in patients with spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage. Medicine (Baltimore). (2019) 98:e16120. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016120
56. Chen, W, Wang, X, Liu, F, Tian, Y, Chen, J, Li, G, et al. The predictive role of postoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for 30-day mortality after intracerebral hematoma evacuation. World Neurosurg. (2020) 134:e631–5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.154
57. Sagar, R, Kumar, A, Verma, V, Yadav, AK, Raj, R, Rawat, D, et al. Incremental accuracy of blood biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2021) 30:105537. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105537
58. Menon, G, Johnson, SE, Hegde, A, Rathod, S, Nayak, R, and Nair, R. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio – a novel prognostic marker following spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2021) 200:106339. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106339
59. Gusdon, AM, Thompson, CB, Quirk, K, Mayasi, YM, Avadhani, R, Awad, IA, et al. CSF and serum inflammatory response and association with outcomes in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage with intraventricular extension: an analysis of the CLEAR-III trial. J Neuroinflammation. (2021) 18:179. doi: 10.1186/s12974-021-02224-w
60. Mackey, J, Blatsioris, AD, Saha, C, Moser, EAS, Carter, RJL, Cohen-Gadol, AA, et al. Higher monocyte count is associated with 30-day case fatality in intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. (2021) 34:456–64. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01040-z
61. Li, J, Yuan, Y, Liao, X, Yu, Z, Li, H, and Zheng, J. Prognostic significance of admission systemic inflammation response index in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a propensity score matching analysis. Front Neurol. (2021) 12:718032. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.718032
62. Radu, RA, Terecoasa, EO, Tiu, C, Ghita, C, Nicula, AI, Marinescu, AN, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Medicina (Kaunas). (2021) 57:622. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060622
63. Yang, W, Yuan, Y, Li, J, Shuai, Y, Liao, X, Yu, Z, et al. Prognostic significance of the combined score of plasma fibrinogen and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Dis Markers. (2021) 2021:7055101. doi: 10.1155/2021/7055101
64. Bender, M, Naumann, T, Uhl, E, and Stein, M. Early serum biomarkers for intensive care unit treatment within the first 24 hours in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. (2021) 82:138–46. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716516
65. Luo, S, Yang, WS, Shen, YQ, Chen, P, Zhang, SQ, Jia, Z, et al. The clinical value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and D-dimer-to-fibrinogen ratio for predicting pneumonia and poor outcomes in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1037255. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1037255
66. Du, Y, Wang, A, Zhang, J, Zhang, X, Li, N, Liu, X, et al. Association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and adverse clinical prognosis in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2022) 18:985–93. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S358078
67. Wang, D, Wang, J, Li, Z, Gu, H, Yang, K, Zhao, X, et al. C-reaction protein and the severity of intracerebral hemorrhage: a study from Chinese stroke center Alliance. Neurol Res. (2022) 44:285–90. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2021.1980842
68. Chu, H, Huang, C, Zhou, Z, Tang, Y, Dong, Q, and Guo, Q. Inflammatory score predicts early hematoma expansion and poor outcomes in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Int J Surg. (2023) 109:266–76. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000191
69. Zhang, GJ, Wang, H, Gao, LC, Zhao, JY, Zhang, T, You, C, et al. Constructing and validating a nomogram for survival in patients without hypertension in hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage-related locations. World Neurosurg. (2023) 172:e256–66. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.01.006
70. Zhang, J, Liu, C, Hu, Y, Yang, A, Zhang, Y, and Hong, Y. The trend of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage and the predictive value of short-term postoperative prognosis in patients. Front Neurol. (2023) 14:1189898. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1189898
71. Shi, J, Liu, Y, Wei, L, Guan, W, and Xia, W. Admission neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to predict 30-day mortality in severe spontaneous basal ganglia hemorrhage. Front Neurol. (2022) 13:1062692. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1062692
72. Kim, Y, Sohn, JH, Kim, C, Park, SY, and Lee, SH. The clinical value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio for predicting hematoma expansion and poor outcomes in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. J Clin Med. (2023) 12:3004. doi: 10.3390/jcm12083004
73. Esmaeili, A, Dadkhahfar, S, Fadakar, K, and Rezaei, N. Post-stroke immunodeficiency: effects of sensitization and tolerization to brain antigens. Int Rev Immunol. (2012) 31:396–409. doi: 10.3109/08830185.2012.723078
74. Dirnagl, U, Klehmet, J, Braun, JS, Harms, H, Meisel, C, Ziemssen, T, et al. Stroke-induced immunodepression: experimental evidence and clinical relevance. Stroke. (2007) 38:770–3. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000251441.89665.bc
75. Zhang, J, Shi, K, Li, Z, Li, M, Han, Y, Wang, L, et al. Organ- and cell-specific immune responses are associated with the outcomes of intracerebral hemorrhage. FASEB J. (2018) 32:220–9. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700324r
76. Di Napoli, M, Slevin, M, Popa-Wagner, A, Singh, P, Lattanzi, S, and Divani, AA. Monomeric C-reactive protein and cerebral hemorrhage: from bench to bedside. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:1921. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01921
77. Holste, K, Xia, F, Garton, HJL, Wan, S, Hua, Y, Keep, RF, et al. The role of complement in brain injury following intracerebral hemorrhage: a review. Exp Neurol. (2021) 340:113654. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2021.113654
78. Lattanzi, S, Brigo, F, Trinka, E, Cagnetti, C, Di Napoli, M, and Silvestrini, M. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in acute cerebral hemorrhage: a system review. Transl Stroke Res. (2019) 10:137–45. doi: 10.1007/s12975-018-0649-4
79. Morotti, A, Marini, S, Jessel, MJ, Schwab, K, Kourkoulis, C, Ayres, AM, et al. Lymphopenia, infectious complications, and outcome in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. (2017) 26:160–6. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0367-2
80. Jiang, C, Wang, Y, Hu, Q, Shou, J, Zhu, L, Tian, N, et al. Immune changes in peripheral blood and hematoma of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. FASEB J. (2020) 34:2774–91. doi: 10.1096/fj.201902478R
81. Li, Z, You, M, Long, C, Bi, R, Xu, H, He, Q, et al. Hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage: An update on prediction and treatment. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:702. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00702
82. Soni, PD . Selection Bias in population registry-based comparative effectiveness research. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2019) 103:1058–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.12.011
83. Mann, CJ . Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emerg Med J. (2003) 20:54–60. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.1.54
84. Ahuja, SK, Manoharan, MS, Lee, GC, McKinnon, LR, Meunier, JA, Steri, M, et al. Immune resilience despite inflammatory stress promotes longevity and favorable health outcomes including resistance to infection. Nat Commun. (2023) 14:3286. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38238-6
Keywords: intracerebral hemorrhage, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, white blood cell, C-reactive protein, prognosis
Citation: Guo P and Zou W (2024) Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, white blood cell, and C-reactive protein predicts poor outcome and increased mortality in intracerebral hemorrhage patients: a meta-analysis. Front. Neurol. 14:1288377. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1288377
Edited by:
Roberto Paganelli, YDA, Institute for Advanced Biologic Therapies, ItalyReviewed by:
Angelo Di Iorio, University of Studies G. d'Annunzio Chieti and Pescara, ItalyJesus Miguel Pradillo, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
Copyright © 2024 Guo and Zou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Wei Zou, d2VpcWlhbmd6aGl6YmpAMTYzLmNvbQ==