Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Neurol., 03 November 2023
Sec. Pediatric Neurology

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in children with malignancies – a single-center retrospective study

Aleksandra KiermaszAleksandra Kiermasz1Magdalena Zapa&#x;aMagdalena Zapała2Bartosz ZwiernikBartosz Zwiernik2Angelika Str&#x;k-Cholewi&#x;skaAngelika Stręk-Cholewińska1Magdalena Machnikowska-Soko&#x;owskaMagdalena Machnikowska-Sokołowska3Agnieszka Mizia-Malarz,
&#x;Agnieszka Mizia-Malarz1,4*
  • 1Department of Oncology, Hematology, and Chemotherapy, Upper Silesia Children’s Care Health Centre, Katowice, Poland
  • 2Students’ Research Group, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
  • 3Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Upper Silesia Children’s Healthcare Center, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
  • 4Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Silesia, Upper Silesia Children’s Care Health Centre, Katowice, Poland

Background: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) diagnosis relies on clinical and radiological characteristics. Clinical manifestations include focal neurologic deficits, hemiparesis, seizures with symptoms of intracranial hypertension, headache, nausea, vomiting, and visual field disturbances. The majority of patients have typical changes in magnetic resonance imaging. The epidemiology and outcomes of PRES in the pediatric cancer population have not been well described. Most of the available data are from retrospective analyses.

Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological presentation as well as the outcome of PRES in children treated for cancers in a single center.

Methods: We analyzed data from 1,053 patients diagnosed with malignancies in a single center over 15 years to determine the incidence of PRES.

Results: 19/1053 (1.8%) patients developed PRES. The diagnosis was accompanied by a range of clinical symptoms including hypertension, seizures, altered mental status, and headaches. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in all patients, and 14/19 (73.7%) exhibited typical findings consistent with PRES. Four patients (21.0%) required treatment in the Intensive Care Unit.

Conclusion:

1. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a rare but significant complication in children with cancer.

2. There is a clear need to establish clinical criteria for PRES to improve the diagnosis and treatment of patients with PRES, particularly in the pediatric oncological population.

3. Further studies are needed to identify the risk factors for recurrent PRES, particularly in pediatric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive treatment.

Introduction

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is diagnosed based on the presence of clinical symptoms and specific radiological changes (13). Despite a limited understanding of PRES epidemiology, children with cancer or those who have undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) appear to be at increased risk for developing PRES. However, few studies have determined the incidence of PRES in pediatric populations, with estimates ranging around 0.04% (2). Among the various risk factors associated with PRES, elevated blood pressure is the most commonly described (3). Other risk factors include autoimmune diseases, renal diseases, anemia, and organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (15). It was also reported in patients receiving immunospuppressive and cytotoxic treatments such as cyclosporin, cisplatin, cytarabine, high-dose methotrexate, gemcytabine, FK506, interferon α, erythropoietin, tacrolimus ans L-asparaginase (6). Several potential pathophysiological explanations for PRES have been proposed, with endothelial dysfunction and the theory of hypertension-induced breakdown in cerebral autoregulation being the most accepted mechanisms (24). Diagnosis of PRES relies on clinical and radiological characteristics, with neurological manifestations including focal neurologic deficits, hemiparesis, seizures with symptoms of intracranial hypertension, headache, nausea, vomiting, and visual field disturbances (3). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard imaging modality, typically showing involvement of the parieto-occipital region, although other areas such as the temporal or frontal lobes and posterior fossa may also be affected (5, 7). The term “reversible” stems from the fact that neurological and neuroimaging findings often spontaneously improve with the initiation of treatment, which typically involves antihypertensive and anti-edema measures (5). Unfortunately, data suggest that there is a subset of patients with PRES who may experience an unfavorable course with incomplete recovery, leading to permanent neurological deficits and even death (3, 8).

Subjects and methods

This retrospective observational study included a total of 1,053 patients, ranging in age from 1 month to 17.8 years, who were diagnosed and treated for malignancy between June 2008 and December 2022 at the Oncology, Hematology, and Chemotherapy Department of the Upper Silesia Children’s Healthcare Center. Patients who presented with symptoms suggestive of PRES (hypertension and/or encephalopathy) underwent screening with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The diagnosis of PRES was established based on clinical symptoms supported by radiographic evidence. A subgroup of 19 children (1.8%) with PRES syndrome was identified, and additional data were collected from their medical records. The collected data were analyzed to determine the incidence in PRES, which is presented as medians and ranges or as frequencies.

Results

The study group consisted of 19 patients diagnosed with PRES; age 2.5–11 years old (median 6.0); gender F/M 8/11. Among the studied group, both solid tumors and hematological malignancies were diagnosed, with acute lymphoblastic leukemia being the most common cancer associated with PRES (n = 9) (Table 1). Gender, age, and multiple diseases were assessed for their association with PRES, but none of these factors were found to be statistically significant (p > 0.05).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Types and localization of primary diagnosis in all 19 patients with PRES.

The median time from the onset of malignancy treatment to the diagnosis of PRES was 81 days, with an average of 226 days. A comparison of this median between groups with different primary diagnoses revealed a significantly shorter time to develop PRES in the hematological group compared to the brain tumor group (81 days vs. 396.5 days). The receipt of intrathecal chemotherapy was not found to be associated with PRES (p > 0.05). All patients received standard protocol treatment based on their oncological diagnosis. Prior to the episode of PRES, 5 children (26.3%) received supportive radiotherapy, and 2 patients (10.5%) underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and relapsed ALL had all received corticosteroids at the time of PRES onset.

Clinical symptoms

The analysis also focused on the type and frequency of clinical complaints to better characterize the prodromal symptoms and course of the illness (Table 2). Among the patients, the most common symptoms were episodes of hypertension and disturbances of consciousness, which were observed in 15 out of 19 cases (78.9%). Apathy was the next most common symptom, occurring in 42.1% of children (8 out of 19), followed by visual changes, headache, and nausea or vomiting. The median systolic pressure was 145 (110–180) and the diastolic pressure was 100 (70–120).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Number of symptoms experienced by patients with PRES.

MRI results

The majority of findings in the group were consistent with typical PRES characteristics, including subcortical areas of high signal intensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and T2-weighted images (Table 3). The most frequently affected regions were the occipital, parietal, and frontal lobes. Among the observed findings, 63.20% were symmetrical and bilateral. Additionally, four patients exhibited diffuse lesions in both hemispheres of the cerebellum (Figure 1).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Number of MRI findings associated with patients with PRES.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. PRES changes in the brain, MRI images from 2 patients.

Laboratory findings

The median blood cell counts revealed the presence of anemia and thrombocytopenia, which are consistent with the underlying diseases. Additionally, 6 patients (31.6%) were found to be neutropenic at the time of PRES onset. Elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and aminotransferases were retrospectively reported in 9 out of 19 cases (47.4%) and 4 out of 19 cases (21.1%), respectively. Hyponatremia was the most frequently observed electrolyte disorder, reported in 36.8% of cases. Hypomagnesemia and hyperkalemia were each detected in 15.8% of children. Hypernatremia and hypophosphatemia were reported in 5.3% of cases (Table 4). We did not perform lumbar puncture in our patients.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Value of blood pressures and laboratory evaluation in first day of PRES diagnosis.

Seizure control and the restoration of a normal level of consciousness were achieved in all the children studied within 1–2 weeks. One case of recurrence was reported, occurring 9 days after the initial attack. This patient had been diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and PRES developed during induction therapy.

Antihypertensive medications were administered to control hypertension in all patients. Additionally, 12 out of 19 patients (63.2%) received anti-edema treatment in the form of 20% mannitol infusions. Clonazepam was the most commonly used medication for seizure prevention. Four out of 19 children (21.2%) required transfer to the Intensive Care Unit. Among the patients, only four needed ongoing chemotherapy, which was temporarily suspended for a maximum of 2 weeks after the diagnosis of PRES.

Unfortunately, one patient diagnosed with PRES passed away during hospitalization on intensive care unit due to increasing cerebral edema caused by PRES and clostridium sepsis.

Discussion

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a relatively rare neurological and radiological complication in the pediatric population, and its etiology encompasses a wide range of possibilities (16). Our study examined 19 children diagnosed with PRES over 15 years. The most common underlying diseases in our group were hematological malignancies, with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) being the most frequently observed. All the patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and relapsed ALL had all received corticosteroids at the time of PRES onset. The incidence of PRES in our analysis was 1.8%, which translates to 18.5 cases per 1,000 patients per year. A comparison of the groups with different primary diagnoses revealed a significantly shorter time to develop PRES in the hematological group compared to the brain tumor group. All the studied patients experienced clinical recovery, with only one case of recurrence reported. We were able to characterize the clinical symptoms and MRI findings in our group.

Previous studies have retrospectively investigated the incidence rate of PRES in children, with estimates ranging from 0.4% in pediatric intensive care unit admissions to 0.7% in pediatric patients with cancer and 0.04% in the pediatric population in the USA (2, 9, 10). While the incidence in our study (1,8%) may appear high, it is important to consider the specific nature of our group, which consisted of a single-center pediatric population. Furthermore, the lack of standardized diagnostic criteria for PRES, given its diverse manifestations (both clinical and radiological) among patients, adds to the difficulty of determining the true incidence. Thus, it is crucial to understand the presenting signs, symptoms, and etiological factors (such as associated treatments and underlying diseases) that may predispose a child to PRES.

In our analysis of clinical presentation and radiological findings, we observed the most frequently reported changes that were consistent with the existing literature on PRES (13, 11, 12). MRI was the confirmation method used in all patients, and the typical involvement of the parietal, occipital, and frontal lobes was commonly observed (13). Four patients also exhibited cerebellar involvement, which, although less common, has been reported in cases of PRES (7, 13). The top three symptoms in our study were altered mental status, convulsions, and hypertension. Notably, these symptoms were often observed in combination, suggesting complex manifestations of PRES with associated neurological deficits. This underscores the importance of considering PRES in the differential diagnosis of neurological deficits. Hypertension is the most commonly observed manifestation, increased blood pressure may disrupt cerebral autoregulation, which is one of the proposed mechanisms in PRES pathophysiology (14). In literature, PRES has also been reported in cases with normal or marginally elevated blood pressure. In such cases, cancer, chemotherapy, or immunosuppressive treatments may contribute to PRES through their damaging effects on the vascular endothelium (15). In our study the majority of patients manifested hypertension. All the patients in our study had a history of immunomodulatory treatment or chemotherapy, and the majority of children with ALL developed PRES during the induction phase of chemotherapy. Previous studies have also suggested induction chemotherapy as a significant risk factor for PRES in children with leukemia (1618). However, there have been reports of PRES occurring during the consolidation phase as well (19). Several chemotherapeutic drugs, including vincristine, L-asparaginase, cyclophosphamide, high-dose methotrexate, and cytarabine, have been associated with PRES, but none have been identified as the definitive cause in children with leukemia (1618). In our group 63% of patients with hematological malignancies (7 of 11 patients) received L-Asparaginase 3–14 days, 81% (9 of 11 patients) received intrathecal methotrexat and all received corticosteroids before the episode of PRES. The combination of drug toxicities is likely to contribute to the development of PRES. Unfortunately, modifying drug doses or discontinuing therapy entirely may not always be feasible, particularly when combating cancer. The pathogenesis of this syndrome remains incompletely understood, highlighting the need for further research. In our study, we observed only one case of a second episode of PRES in patients with ALL (16, 2022). There is still uncertainty as to whether the continued administration of drugs after the initial episode of PRES contributes to recurrence (18, 19).

Most PRES cases demonstrate reversible and favorable outcomes (8, 14, 2326). However, the mortality rate varies widely depending on the population studied, ranging from 3.2% in children to as high as 16% in adults (2, 5). Only one patient died in our study group which is 5.2%. It is higher than in the literature, possibly because of the small number of patients in our study group. Certain risk factors, such as autoimmune conditions, hypertensive crisis, renal failure, multi-organ failure, and infection, may indicate a worse prognosis or irreversible PRES (14, 23, 25).

This study has some limitations, as it is retrospective and conducted in a single center over 15 years, focusing specifically on pediatric malignancies. Nonetheless, it provides important insights into the diagnosis and outcomes of PRES in this population. Future studies should aim to include a larger number of children from multiple centers to further advance our understanding of PRES.

Conclusion

1. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a rare but significant complication in children with cancer.

2. Children suffering from acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the course of induction treatment are the most vulnerable group of pediatric oncological patients for PRES.

3. There is a clear need to establish clinical criteria for the improved diagnosis and treatment of patients with PRES, particularly in the pediatric oncological population.

4. Further studies are needed to identify the risk factors for recurrent PRES, particularly in pediatric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive treatment.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for the study involving human samples in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

AM-M: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AK: Resources, Writing – original draft. MZ: Formal analysis, Project administration, Writing – original draft. BZ: Formal analysis, Resources, Writing – original draft. AS-C: Formal analysis, Resources, Writing – review & editing. MM-S: Resources, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Fugate, JE, and Rabinstein, AA. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: clinical and radiological manifestations, pathophysiology, and outstanding. Lancet Neurol. (2015) 14:914–25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00111-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Thavamani, A, Umapathi, KK, Puliyel, M, Super, D, Allareddy, V, and Ghori, A. Epidemiology, comorbidities, and outcomes of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in children in the United States. Pediatr Neurol. (2020) 103:21–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2019.07.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lee, VH, Wijdicks, EF, Manno, EM, and Rabinstein, AA. Clinical spectrum of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. Arch Neurol. (2008) 65:205–10. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2007.46

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Bartynski, WS. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, part 2: controversies surrounding pathophysiology of vasogenic edema. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2008) 29:1043–9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0929

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Ando, Y, Ono, Y, Sano, A, Fujita, N, and Ono, S. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: a review of the literature. Intern Med. (2022) 61:135–41. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.7520-21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hourani, R, Abboud, M, Hourani, M, Khalifeh, H, and Muwakkit, S. L-asparaginase-induced posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome during acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment in children. Neuropediatrics. (2008) 39:46–50. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1076740

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Li, K, Yang, Y, Guo, D, Sun, D, and Li, C. Clinical and MRI features of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with atypical regions: a descriptive study with a large sample size. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:194. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00194

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Legriel, S, Schraub, O, Azoulay, E, Hantson, P, Magalhaes, E, Coquet, I, et al. Determinants of recovery from severe posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. PLoS One. (2012) 7:e44534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044534

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Raj, S, Overby, P, Erdfarb, A, and Ushay, HM. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: incidence and associated factors in a pediatric critical care population. Pediatr Neurol. (2013) 49:335–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.06.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Khan, RB, Sadighi, ZS, Zabrowski, J, Gajjar, A, and Jeha, S. Imaging patterns and outcome of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome during childhood Cancer treatment. Pediatr Blood Cancer. (2016) 63:523–6. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25790

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Moon, S-N, Jeon, SJ, Choi, SS, Song, CJ, Chung, GH, Yu, IK, et al. Can clinical and MRI findings predict the prognosis of variant and classical type of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES)? Acta Radiol. (2013) 54:1182–90. doi: 10.1177/0284185113491252

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Raman, R, Devaramane, R, Mukunda Jagadish, G, and Chowdaiah, S. Various imaging manifestations of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Pol J Radiol. (2017) 82:64–70. doi: 10.12659/PJR.899960

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Hugonnet, E, Da Ines, D, Boby, H, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES): features on CT and MR imaging Diagn Interv. Imaging. (2013) 94:45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2012.02.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Chen, TH. Childhood posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: clinicoradiological characteristics, managements, and outcome. Front Pediatr. (2020) 8:585. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00585

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. de Laat, P, Te Winkel, ML, Devos, AS, Catsman-Berrevoets, CE, Pieters, R, and van den Heuvel-Eibrink, MM. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in childhood cancer. Ann Oncol. (2011) 22:472–8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq382

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Anastasopoulou, S, Eriksson, MA, Heyman, M, Wang, C, Niinimäki, R, Mikkel, S, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: clinical characteristics, risk factors, course, and outcome of disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. (2019) 66:e27594. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27594

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Panis, B, Vlaar, AM, van Well, GT, Granzen, B, Weber, JW, Postma, AA, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in paediatric leukaemia. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. (2010) 14:539–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2010.01.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Tang, JH, Tian, JM, Sheng, M, Hu, SY, Li, Y, Zhang, LY, et al. Study of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia after induction chemotherapy. J Child Neurol. (2016) 31:279–84. doi: 10.1177/0883073815589758

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Tavares, M, Arantes, M, Chacim, S, Júnior, AC, Pinto, A, Mariz, JM, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in children with hematologic malignancies. J Child Neurol. (2015) 30:1669–75. doi: 10.1177/0883073815578525

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Hiraide, T, Matsubayashi, T, Ishigaki, H, Asahina, M, Sakaguchi, K, and Fukuda, T. Recurrent posterior reversible encephalopathy due to vasospasm and cerebral hypoperfusion in acute leukemia: a case report. No To Hattatsu. (2015) 47:449–53.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

21. Komur, M, Delibas, A, Arslankoylu, AE, Okuyaz, C, and Kara, E. Recurrent and atypical posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a child with hypertension. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. (2012) 15:208–10. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.99721

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Donmez, FY, and Agildere, AM. Recurrent childhood PRES. Neurol Sci. (2015) 36:1603–9. doi: 10.1007/s10072-015-2212-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Alhilali, LM, Reynolds, AR, and Fakhran, S. A multi-disciplinary model of risk factors for fatal outcome in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J Neurol Sci. (2014) 347:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.09.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Hinduja, A. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: clinical features and outcome. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:71. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Roth, C, and Ferbert, A. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: long-term follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2010) 81:773–7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.189647

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Siebert, E, Bohner, G, Endres, M, and Liman, TG. Clinical and radiological spectrum of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: does age make a difference? – a retrospective comparison between adult and pediatric patients. PLoS One. (2014) 9:e115073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, malignancies, children, clinical symptoms, magnetic resonance

Citation: Kiermasz A, Zapała M, Zwiernik B, Stręk-Cholewińska A, Machnikowska-Sokołowska M and Mizia-Malarz A (2023) Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in children with malignancies – a single-center retrospective study. Front. Neurol. 14:1261075. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1261075

Received: 18 July 2023; Accepted: 23 October 2023;
Published: 03 November 2023.

Edited by:

Angelo Lavano, University of Magna Graecia, Italy

Reviewed by:

Roula Hourani, American University of Beirut, Lebanon
Fabio Pilato, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Italy

Copyright © 2023 Kiermasz, Zapała, Zwiernik, Stręk-Cholewińska, Machnikowska-Sokołowska and Mizia-Malarz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Agnieszka Mizia-Malarz, YS5taXppYUBob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ==; YW1pemlhLW1hbGFyekBzdW0uZWR1LnBs

ORCID: Agnieszka Mizia-Malarz, orcid.org/0000-0002-1984-5527

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.