Is acupoint injection the optimal way to administer mecobalamin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy? A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Objective: Mecobalamin is a commonly used drug in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupoint injection of mecobalamin for DPN.

Methods: Relevant clinical trials on acupoint injection of mecobalamin for DPN published before 31 January 2023 were searched in eight commonly used databases. After screening and confirming the included studies, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were performed.

Results: A total of 10 relevant studies were confirmed, and the total sample size was 927 cases. On the efficacy endpoints, meta-analysis showed that compared with other administration methods, acupoint injection of mecobalamin significantly increased the clinical effective rate by 27% [RR = 1.27, 95% CI = (1.19, 1.36), P < 0.00001], motor nerve conduction velocity (median nerve) by 5.93 m/s [MD = 5.93, 95% CI = (4.79, 7.07), P < 0.00001], motor nerve conduction velocity (common peroneal nerve) by 5.66 m/s [MD = 5.66, 95% CI = (2.89, 8.43), P < 0.0001], sensory nerve conduction velocity (median nerve) by 4.83 m/s [MD = 4.83, 95% CI = (3.75, 5.90), P < 0.00001], and sensory nerve conduction velocity (common peroneal nerve) by 3.60 m/s [MD = 3.60, 95% CI = (2.49, 4.71), P < 0.00001], and trial sequential analysis showed these benefits were conclusive. In terms of safety endpoints, meta-analysis indicated that the total adverse events for acupoint injection were comparable to other methods of administration, and trial sequential analysis suggested that the results needed to be validated by more studies. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the benefits of acupoint injections of mecobalamin were not limited by the dose, duration of treatment, or number of acupoints reported in the included studies. Harbord's test showed no significant publication bias (P = 0.106).

Conclusion: The efficacy of acupoint injection of mecobalamin for DPN was significantly better than other administrations, and its safety was comparable to other administrations. Therefore, acupoint injection may be the optimal method of mecobalamin for DPN.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=454120, identifier: CRD42023454120.

1. Introduction

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a peripheral nerve disorder caused by persistent hyperglycemia (1), which is one of the common chronic complications of diabetes (2). DPN mainly manifests as abnormal sensation in distal limbs, symmetrical pain, and movement disorder (3). It is a major cause of disability, foot ulceration, and amputation, which seriously affects the quality of patients' lives (4). Epidemiological studies have shown that ~10% to 20% of patients are diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy at the same time as diabetes (5) and that 50% to 66% of all diabetic patients eventually develop DPN (6). Diabetes patients are reported to spend $663.2 billion per year on treatment. If they got DPN at the same time, the cost would be more than double (7). This is a huge economic burden on individuals, families, health systems, and society. Currently, the goal of treating DPN is to prevent the progression of neuropathy and neurological dysfunction (8). Clinically, nerve-nourishing drugs are often used in combination on the basis of controlling blood sugar.

Mecobalamin is a commonly used clinical drug for nerve nutrition and is essentially endogenous vitamin B12 (9). It can repair the damaged nerve tissue and relieve patients of associated symptoms by promoting the synthesis of lecithin in the medullary sinus and the metabolism of proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids (9). High doses of mecobalamin have been reported to increase the motor nerve conduction velocity of the peroneal nerve by 1.61 m/s and the sensory nerve conduction velocity of the peroneal nerve by 2.73 m/s (10). Although nutritional drugs such as mecobalamin have slowed the progression of DPN to some extent, their clinical efficacy remains limited (11). Therefore, the intervention of novel therapeutic strategies is urgently needed.

In recent years, acupoint injection has attracted more and more attention from researchers (12, 13). Acupoint injection is a way of administering drugs by injecting drugs at acupoints or tender points (14), which is convenient for operation, cost slow, and has few side effects (15). Drug acupoint injections can simultaneously exert the therapeutic effect of drugs and acupoint stimulation, which may lead to a better therapeutic effect (16). Acupoint injections of mecobalamin have been reported to be more effective in reducing clinical symptoms in patients with DPN compared to intramuscular injections, and acupoint injections may be a more effective way to administer the drug (17). However, the research on acupoint injection of mecobalamin is still at the stage of single-center randomized controlled trials, and there is no higher-quality evidence-based evidence for reference. Therefore, this study intends to use meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of acupoint injection of mecobalamin.

2. Materials and methods

This study strictly followed the systematic review and meta-analysis methodology of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (18) and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023454120).

2.1. Literature search

The literature on acupoint injection of mecobalamin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy was searched in four commonly used Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biology Medicine, VIP, and WanFang) and four general English databases (Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PubMed). The subject terms were mecobalamin, acupoint injection, diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, etc. The free terms were supplemented by the Mesh and the Cochrane Library databases, after which the free terms were combined with the subject terms to build a complete search formula. The search is capped at January 2023, with no language or region restrictions.

2.2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) The clinical trials with randomized controlled design. (ii) The patients met the diagnostic criteria for type 2 diabetes established by the World Health Organization in 1999 and had peripheral neuropathy (19–25): (1) abnormal sensation in the limbs; (2) markedly diminished or absent superficial and deep reflexes; (3) electrophysiological examination suggestive of a slowing down of the nerve conduction velocities; (4) exclusion of other causes of neuropathy. (iii) The administration of mecobalamin to the DPN patients in the experimental group was by acupoint injection, while the administration of mecobalamin to the control group was by other methods (oral, intramuscular, and intravenous injection). (iv) The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical effective rate. The clinical effective rate was the effective number divided by the total number. Effective was defined as a reduction in clinical symptoms and an improvement in achilles and knee reflexes. Secondary efficacy endpoints included motor nerve conduction velocity and sensory nerve conduction velocity. The safety endpoint was total adverse events.

The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) The same research findings had been repeatedly reported. (ii) The data was not available. (iii) The included objects covered special groups such as children.

2.3. Literature screening, statistics, and quality evaluation

After importing all the literature to be screened into NoteExpress and excluding duplicates, the target literature was gradually screened according to the inclusion criteria. After identifying the included literature, basic information on the clinical trials was extracted and a table of basic characteristics was drawn up. Afterward, the risk of bias in clinical trials was evaluated in accordance with Cochrane guidelines. These studies were completed independently by FZ and YY. SY was in charge of making decisions when there were disagreements.

2.4. Statistical analysis

Revman 5.3 software and TSA0.9.5.10 Beta were used to perform meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis, respectively. When the indicator was a continuous variable, the mean difference (MD) was used as the effect size. When the indicator was a dichotomous variable, the relative risk (RR) was used as the effect size. The heterogeneity of each indicator was evaluated by the I² value, and the corresponding effect model was selected according to the I² value. When I² < 50%, a fixed effects model was chosen to analyze the data. When I² ≥ 50%, a random effects model was selected to analyze the data. In the trial sequential analysis, the indicator was indicated to be conclusive when the Z curve reached a boundary value. Harbord-weighted linear regression was employed to test for publication bias, with no significant publication bias if P-value > 0.1. The quality evaluation of evidence drew on the GRADE guidelines to comprehensively evaluate the quality of evidence for each indicator.

3. Results

3.1. Literature search results

A total of 345 relevant publications were obtained from the screening. Among them, 198 studies were eliminated due to duplication and other reasons, 130 studies were excluded due to inconsistent topics (1 animal experiment, 5 single-arm studies, 2 reviews, and 122 studies with incompatible intervention programs), 1 literature was removed because no report was retrieved, and 6 studies were eliminated because of non-randomized controlled trials. Finally, 10 clinical studies (26–35) were included, as shown in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Flow chart of literature screening.

3.2. Basic characteristics of the included studies

A total of 10 clinical studies (26–35) published between 2009 and 2022 were included, and the research centers were all in China. The total sample size was 927 cases, including 464 cases in the experimental group and 463 cases in the control group. The basic characteristics are shown in Table 1. The position, regional anatomy, and innervation of the acupoints are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Table of basic characteristics of the included studies.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Position, regional anatomy, and innervation of acupoints.

3.3. Risk of bias assessment

The risk of bias assessment showed that the risk of bias was unclear for the randomized design in five studies, allocation concealment in nine studies, and blinding of participants to the intervention in 10 studies, with the remaining areas at low risk of bias, as shown in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Risk of bias graph.

3.4. Meta-analysis results

3.4.1. Efficacy endpoints

3.4.1.1. Primary efficacy endpoint

Meta-analysis demonstrated that acupoint injection of mecobalamin significantly increased the clinical effective rate [RR = 1.27, 95% CI (1.19, 1.36), P < 0.00001] by 27% compared to other delivery methods. Sensitivity analyses showed low sensitivity for the clinical effective rate combined analyses, suggesting that the results were robust. In the subgroup analysis, acupoint injection of mecobalamin increased the clinical effective rate by approximately 34% relative to oral administration [RR = 1.34, 95% CI (1.06, 1.70), P = 0.01], approximately 34% relative to intramuscular injection [RR = 1.34, 95% CI (1.19, 1.49), P < 0.00001], and ~21% relative to intravenous injection [RR = 1.21, 95% CI (1.11, 1.32), P < 0.0001]. Trial sequential analysis indicated that the cumulative Z-value for the clinical effective rate crossed the TSA boundary in the second study, suggesting that the results observed in the current information set were conclusive. The quality assessment of the evidence showed that the quality of evidence for the clinical effectiveness rate was moderate, as shown in Figure 3.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of the primary efficacy endpoints for acupoint injections of mecobalamin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

3.4.1.2. Secondary efficacy endpoints

Meta-analysis demonstrated that acupoint injection of mecobalamin significantly increased not only motor nerve conduction velocity (median nerve) by 5.93 m/s [MD = 5.93, 95% CI = (4.79, 7.07), P < 0.00001] and motor nerve conduction velocity (common peroneal nerve) by 5.66 m/s [MD = 5.66, 95% CI = (2.89, 8.43), P < 0.0001] but also sensory nerve conduction velocity (median nerve) by 4.83 m/s [MD = 4.83, 95% CI = (3.75, 5.90), P < 0.00001] and sensory nerve conduction velocity (common peroneal nerve) by 3.60 m/s [MD = 3.60, 95% CI = (2.49, 4.71), P < 0.00001] compared to other delivery methods. Sensitivity analysis showed a low sensitivity and high confidence in the results for the combined motor nerve conduction velocity (common peroneal nerve). Trial sequential analysis suggested that these benefits observed for the current information set were conclusive. The quality of evidence assessment showed that the quality of evidence for motor nerve conduction velocity (common peroneal nerve) was low, and the quality of evidence for other indicators was moderate, as shown in Figure 4.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of secondary efficacy endpoints for acupoint injection of mecobalamin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

3.4.2. Safety endpoints

Meta-analysis demonstrated that the total adverse events for acupoint injection of mecobalamin were comparable to other delivery methods. Trial sequential analysis indicated that the cumulative Z-value for total adverse events did not yet meet the desired information set, suggesting that the results need to be validated in more relevant studies. The quality assessment of evidence showed that the quality of evidence for total adverse events was low, as shown in Figure 5.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of safety endpoints for acupoint injection of mecobalamin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

3.5. Subgroup analysis

Subgroups of “0.5 mg q2d”, “0.5 mg qd,” and “1.25 mg q2d” were set up using the dose of acupoint injection as the category. The results demonstrated that acupoint injection of mecobalamin at “0.5 mg q2d” and “0.5 mg qd” significantly improved the clinical efficiency, while the clinical efficacy rate of “1.25 mg q2d” was comparable to that of the control group, as shown in Table 3.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Subgroup analysis of acupoint injection of mecobalamin for DNP.

There are subgroups of “2 weeks,” “4 weeks,” and “6 weeks” based on the duration of the acupoint injection. The results indicated that acupoint injections of mecobalamin at “2 weeks,” “4 weeks,” and “6 weeks” significantly increased the clinical effective rates, as shown in Table 3.

“Single-acupoint” and “multiple-acupoints” subgroups were set by the number of acupoints injected. The results suggested that acupoint injection of mecobalamin at both “single” and “multiple” acupoints significantly improved the clinical effective rates, as shown in Table 3.

3.6. Assessment of publication bias

Taking the clinical effective rate as the standard, the Harbord-weighted linear regression based on event rates in the experimental and control groups showed no significant publication bias in the study (P = 0.106), as shown in Figure 6.

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. Harbord-weighted linear regression of the clinical effective rate.

4. Discussion

Currently, lowering blood sugar and nourishing the nerves are the main means of treating DPN (36). Although drugs such as mecobalamin and alpha-lipoic acid can delay the progression of DPN to some extent, their clinical efficacy is still limited (37). Acupoint injection is a characteristic therapy in which drugs are injected into corresponding acupoints for therapeutic purposes under the guidance of the meridian theory of Chinese medicine and is widely used in China because of its simple operation and considerable efficacy (38). In 2006, Chinese researchers first reported the application of acupoint injection of mecobalamin in patients with DPN, and they found that acupoint injection of mecobalamin was significantly better than intramuscular injection in reducing symptoms and signs (17). Subsequently, a randomized controlled trial published in 2009 confirmed that the clinical efficacy of acupoint injections of mecobalamin was significantly higher than that of intravenous injections (34). Since then, there has been increasing evidence that acupoint injections of mecobalamin may be a more effective strategy for treating DPN (39). A total of 10 clinical trials and a sample size of 927 were subjected to this meta-analysis and TSA, which aimed to comprehensively assess the benefit of acupoint injection of mecobalamin in DPN.

Meta-analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint showed that acupoint injection of mecobalamin significantly increased the clinical effective rate by 27% relative to other delivery methods, meaning that acupoint injection was significantly more effective than any oral, intramuscular, or intravenous administration. TSA demonstrated that the observed results of the current amount of information were conclusive, implying that acupoint injection of mecobalamin was superior to other delivery methods in reducing clinical symptoms and neurological signs in patients with DPN. However, it should be noted that in the subgroup analysis of the mode of administration, the oral subgroup included only two studies and a sample size of 130. This may lead to a decrease in the precision of the results, and therefore, the results remain to be validated by more studies. Compared to other delivery methods for secondary efficacy endpoints, acupoint injection of mecobalamin significantly increased the motor nerve conduction velocities by 5.93 m/s (median nerve) and 5.66 m/s (common peroneal nerve) and the sensory nerve conduction velocities by 4.83 m/s (median nerve) and 3.60 m/s (common peroneal nerve). TSA confirmed that these benefits were conclusive, suggesting that acupoint injection can effectively improve the function of the sensory nerve and motor nerve in patients with DPN. Interestingly, Sun et al. (30) found a negative correlation between the efficacy of acupoint injections of mecobalamin and the duration of DPN disease, implying that the earlier the use of acupoint injections of mecobalamin the greater the benefit may be. In addition, some of the included studies (32, 33, 35) also reported the benefits of acupoint injection of mecobalamin in Substance P (SP) and the vibration perception threshold test (VPT). SP is a conductive substance of sensory neurons and is a potential biomarker of DPN (40, 41). Studies by Xie et al. (32, 33) have shown that compared with oral or intramuscular injection, acupoint injection of mecobalamin can significantly increase the serum SP level in patients with DPN, thereby improving neurological function. The VPT is the most sensitive test for detecting DPN and is also a predictor of foot injury (42, 43). Zhao et al. (35) found that acupoint injection of mecobalamin can significantly reduce VPT, thereby reducing the clinical symptoms of patients and the risk of foot ulcers. These evidences suggest that acupoint injection of mecobalamin may be a practical and effective way of drug delivery.

Subgroup analysis indicated that in the dose subgroup, the acupoint injection of mecobalamin at 0.5 mg q2d and 0.5 mg qd could significantly improve the clinical effective rate, while the clinical effective rate of 1.25 mg q2d was comparable to that of the control group. However, we cannot yet assume that acupoint injection of mecobalamin at 1.25 mg q2d is not clinically relevant as the original study also reported a benefit of 1.25 mg q2d in improving motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities (31). Therefore, we preliminarily judged that the acupoint injection of three dosages of mecobalamin can achieve benefits in patients with DPN. Acupoint injections of mecobalamin for 2, 4, and 6 weeks significantly increased the clinical effective rate in the course of the treatment subgroup, suggesting that additional benefits can be realized from acupoint injections in both short- and long-term treatment. In the number of acupoints subgroup, both single-acupoint injections and multiple-acupoint injections significantly increased the clinical effective rate, suggesting that both single-acupoint and multiple-acupoint injections improved clinical efficacy. In traditional Chinese medicine theory, ST36 has the function of regulating the spleen, stomach, qi and blood, and it is the most important acupoint for strong healthcare. Relevant studies have shown that stimulating ST36 can promote local blood circulation in the lower limbs and regulate local nerve function (44), so ST36 has been used by researchers as a key acupoint for the treatment of DPN by acupoint injection (45). In addition, SP6 is an intersection acupoint of the three yin channels of the foot, which has the effect of tonifying the liver and kidneys and regulating qi and blood. LI4 and LI11 are acupoints of the large intestine channel of the hand Yang Ming, which have the effect of regulating qi and blood and moistening the meridians. GB34 is an acupoint of the kidney channel of the foot Shao Yin, which is mainly used for treating musculoskeletal disorders. SP10 is an acupoint of the spleen channel of the foot Tai Yin, which is effective in activating and nourishing. BL57 and BL60 are located on the posterior side of the calf and lateral side of the ankle, respectively, which can dredge qi and blood in the lower limbs. All of these points have the effect of promoting the circulation of qi and blood, and stimulating them can promote blood circulation and improve nerve function (46). In summary, it can be noted that the additional benefit of acupoint injection of mecobalamin was not limited by the dose, duration of treatment, and number of acupoints reported in the included studies.

In terms of safety endpoints, meta-analysis demonstrated that the total adverse events for acupoint injection of mecobalamin were comparable to other delivery methods, suggesting that acupoint injection of mecobalamin has a good safety profile. TSA indicated that the cumulative Z-value for total adverse events had not yet reached the required information set, suggesting that the results have yet to be validated by more relevant studies. Although research results show that acupoint injection has good safety, we still need to pay attention to possible adverse events such as hematoma, nerve injury, pain, acupuncture dizziness, infection, and allergic reaction (47–49). (1) Hematoma: It is mainly caused by subcutaneous bleeding due to mistakenly puncturing a blood vessel or damaging the surrounding tissues during the operation. A small amount of bleeding can be absorbed by itself. If too much subcutaneous bleeding causes severe pain, cold compresses should be used to stop the bleeding first, and after 24 h, hot compresses should be applied to promote the absorption of congestion. During the operation, it is necessary to avoid blood vessels when inserting the needle, pump back the needle after insertion to prevent puncture of blood vessels, and immediately press the skin when the needle is pulled back so as to reduce the risk of hematoma. (2) Nerve damage: It refers to an injury of the nerve trunk during the operation that produces a strong feeling of electric shock and numbness. The nerve trunk should be avoided during the operation, and needle insertion should be done by pricking through the skin first and slowly. When the feeling of electric shock occurs, the needle should be pulled out immediately, and the direction of needle advancement should be changed. (3) Pain: In general, the pain when inserting the needle is mild, and the severe pain is mostly due to the formation of hematoma. So, avoiding the formation of hematoma can effectively reduce the occurrence of pain. The subgroup analysis of this study found that both single-point injection and multi-point injection can significantly improve clinical efficacy, so we recommend the use of ST36 single-point injection to reduce the painful stimulation of the patient during the entry of the needle, improving the patient's compliance. (4) Acupuncture dizziness: It refers to dizziness, nausea, palpitation, and sweating during the operation, mostly due to nervousness, hunger, and other factors. When this occurs, the injection should be stopped immediately, and the patient should recover before operating slowly. (5) Infection: This is mostly due to improper disinfection during the operation, and strict implementation of a standardized disinfection protocol can significantly reduce the risk of infection. (6) Allergic reaction: A small number of patients may develop symptoms such as skin rash, itching, palpitation, and asthma due to drug allergy, and the injection should be stopped immediately. In mild cases, it may disappear on its own after stopping the injection, while in severe cases, rescue is required. In order to avoid such dangerous situations, it is essential to ask for a detailed history of allergy and to perform a skin test before the operation.

In fact, acupoint injection is a special kind of intramuscular injection, which is required to perform intramuscular injection at the location of characteristic acupoints so that patients can obtain the therapeutic effect of drugs and acupoints at the same time. The additional benefit of acupoint injection compared with intramuscular injection is mainly due to the therapeutic effect induced by acupoints (50). However, the specific mechanism of this effect is still unclear. Some scholars believe that it may be achieved by stimulating the local innervation and blood circulation of acupoints to affect the nerve-endocrine-immune system (51). Therefore, theoretically, the safety of acupoint injection is equivalent to that of intramuscular injection, and they are both safe and reliable methods of administering mecobalamin. Notably, acupoint injection requires the same consumables as intramuscular injection, which means that it is a delivery method that can be used to achieve efficacy benefits without increasing the financial burden. Therefore, we believe that it may be of great clinical value in the future.

Although this study followed the guidelines closely, there are still some limitations. First of all, there is a certain amount of methodological heterogeneity. None of the studies mentioned blinding, which may increase the risk of implementation bias and reduce the confidence of the results. Second, the study included a small number of studies and a small sample size, and the quality of the evidence was low, which may have reduced the precision of the results. Third, the diagnostic criteria included in the study were related to the Diabetic Peripheral Nerve Diagnostic Code in 2009, the Chinese Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes (2017), the Chinese Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes (2013), the Practical Endocrinology in 2004, and the Chinese and Western Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes and its Complications in 1997. There are certain differences in the basic diagnosis of each standard, which may affect the meta-analysis. Fourth, acupoint injection is a common external treatment method of Chinese medicine, which is rarely used in countries other than China. This has resulted in the existing clinical trials being conducted in China and with Chinese subjects. This means that the results of the study may only apply to people of Chinese descent, and it is unclear how acupoint injections of mecobalamin work in other ethnic groups. Fifth, although this study clarifies the benefits of acupoint injection of mecobalamin, there is no direct comparison between different doses, courses of treatment, and the number of acupoints of acupoint injection of mecobalamin. Therefore, the optimal dosage and course of treatment of mecobalamin for acupoint injection are not yet clear.

Given the limitations of the existing research, we look forward to continuous improvement in future studies. First, on the basis of controlling relevant variables, high-quality randomized controlled double-blind trials can be continued. This can explore in depth the specific benefits of acupoint injections of mecobalamin at different doses, duration of treatment and number of acupoints, thereby exploring the optimal dosage and duration of acupoint injections of mecobalamin. Second, evaluation indicators such as SP and VPT can be added to study in depth the underlying mechanisms of acupoint injection of mecobalamin in treating DPN. Third, a research center could be established in European, American, and African countries to further explore the effects of acupoint injections of mecobalamin in people of European, American, and African descent. We hope that more scholars will focus on acupoint injection of mecobalamin for treating DPN in the future and that it will bring new hope to patients with DPN.

5. Conclusion

The efficacy of acupoint injections of mecobalamin for DPN was significantly better than other administrations, and its safety profile was comparable. Acupoint injections may be the best way to administer mecobalamin for DPN.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

FZ conceived the article and co-authored the first draft with YY. FZ, YY, and SY were responsible for literature and data. GH, KT, and XY were responsible for the methods and analysis. RY supervised the review and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82074400).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Røikjer J, Mørch CD, Ejskjaer N. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: diagnosis and treatment. Curr Drug Saf. (2021) 16:2–16. doi: 10.2174/1574886315666200731173113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Selvarajah D, Kar D, Khunti K, Davies MJ, Scott AR, Walker J, et al. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: advances in diagnosis and strategies for screening and early intervention. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2019) 7:938–48. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30081-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Xue T, Zhang X, Xing Y, Liu S, Zhang L, Wang X, et al. Advances about immunoin flammatory pathogenesis and treatment in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:748193. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.748193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Khdour MR. Treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a review. J Pharm Pharmacol. (2020) 72:863–72. doi: 10.1111/jphp.13241

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bodman MA, Varacallo M. Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy. Kent: StatPearls Publishing (2022).

Google Scholar

6. Dyck PJ, Kratz KM, Karnes JL, Litchy WJ, Klein R, Pach JM, et al. The prevalence by staged severity of various types of diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy in a population-based cohort: the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study. Neurology. (1993) 43:817–24. doi: 10.1212/WNL.43.4.817

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Sadosky A, Mardekian J, Parsons B, Hopps M, Bienen EJ, Markman J. Healthcare utilization and costs in diabetes relative to the clinical spectrum of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Diabetes Complications. (2015) 29:212–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.10.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Seyedizadeh SH, Cheragh-Birjandi S, Hamedi Nia MR. The effects of combined exercise training. (resistance-aerobic) on serum kinesin and physical function in type 2 diabetes patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (randomized controlled trials). J Diabetes Res. (2020) 2020:6978128. doi: 10.1155/2020/6978128

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Turkiew E, Falconer D, Reed N, Höke A. Deletion of Sarm1 gene is neuroprotective in two models of peripheral neuropathy. J Peripher Nerv Syst. (2017) 22:162–71. doi: 10.1111/jns.12219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Cai J, Wei J, Zhang JP. Efficacy and safety of high-dose mecobalamin ondiabetes peripheral neuropathy: a meta-analysis. Chin J Mod Appl Pharmacy. (2019) 36:1686–91. doi: 10.13748/j.cnki.issn1007-7693.2019.13.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Yu B, Li M, Huang H, Ma S, Huang K, Zhong Z, et al. Acupuncture treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: an overview of systematic reviews. J Clin Pharm Ther. (2021) 46:585–98. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13351

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Li H, Liu SJ, Wang TM. Progress in the application of traditional Chinese medicine in patients with arteriosclerosis obliterans. Chin J Surg Int Trad Western Med. (2023) 29:134–6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6948.2023.01.027

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Xie TY, Li XM. Research progress in the treatment of respiratory diseases by self-blood acupoint injection therapy. Chin J Rural Med Pharmacy. (2023) 30:74–6. doi: 10.19542/j.cnki.1006-5180.006954

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Yang XL, Wang ZM, Zhou CL, Liu XZ. Clinical observation on mecobalamin acupoint injection in the treatment of diabetes peripheral neuropathy. Guangming J Chin Med. (2022) 37:1827–9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8914.2022.10.042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Zhang LM. Clinical study on acupoint injection in the treatment of diabetes peripheral neuropathy. Pract Clin J Int Trad Western Med. (2022) 22:103–5+116. doi: 10.13638/j.issn.1671-4040.2022.11.031

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Liu L, Jiang C, Zhao Z. Effects of salvia miltiorrhiza Ligustrazine injection combined with mecobalamin on diabetic peripheral neuropathy and oxidative stress response. Chin Herbal Med. (2019) 50:2670–4. doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2019.11.025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Zhang JZ, Huang HC. 30 cases of diabetes peripheral neuropathy treated with mecobalamin point injection and pulse therapy. Shaanxi J Trad Chin Med. (2006) l97:1561–2. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7369.2006.12.073

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. (2021) 372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Heng XP. Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes Neuropathy. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House (2002). p. 48–52.

Google Scholar

20. Lv RH. Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes and Its Complications. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House (1997). p. 391.

Google Scholar

21. Liu XM. The Practical Endocrinology. Beijing: People's Military Medical Publishing House (2004). p. 1416–8.

Google Scholar

22. Chinese Diabetes Society. Chinese guidelines for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. Chin J Diab. (2014) 6:447–98. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2014.07.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Chinese Diabetes Society. Chinese guidelines for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. (2017). Chin J Diab. (2018) 10:4–67. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2018.01.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Shen ZZ. Chronic Complications of Diabetes. Shanghai: Shanghai Medical University Publishing (1999). p. 206–287.

Google Scholar

25. Hu RM, Fan DS. Diagnostic and therapeutic regulations for diabetes peripheral neuropathy. Chin J Diab. (2009) 17:638–40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6187.2009.08.022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Cao R. Mecobalamin zusanli acupoint injection in adjuvant treatmenton diabetic peripheral neuropathy of lower limb. Hebei Medicine. (2015) 21:323–5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2015.02.051

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Guo HF, Zhao SK, Li CH, Guo YK, Zhang XY. Clinical experience of mecobalamin injection at zusanli point in treating diabetes peripheral neuropathy. professional committee of neurology, shandong society of integrated traditional and western medicine. Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine Neurology in Shandong Province (Shandong). (2011). p. 4.

Google Scholar

28. Liu YW. Efficacy and safety of different injection methods of mecobalamin in the treatment of diabetes peripheral neuropathy. Chin Sci Technol J Database. (2021) 3:97–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

29. Mo GG, Qin LH, Huang XQ. Clinical observation on 40 cases of diabetes peripheral neuropathy treated by point injection of mecobalamin. Jiangsu J Trad Chin Med. (2011) 43:63–4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-397X.2011.11.044

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Sun JP, Han YG. Observation on the therapeutic effect of mecobalamin point injection on peripheral neuropathy of lower limbs in diabetes. J Modern Int Trad Chin Western Med. (2011) 20:2512–3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2011.20.020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Wen XX. Clinical observation on point injection of mecobalamin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes peripheral neuropathy. J North Pharmacy. (2014) 11:30–1.

Google Scholar

32. Xie Q, Hua DP, Zhang LY, Chen XW. Observation on therapeutic effect of drug point injection on diabetes peripheral neuropathy. Jiangxi J Trad Chin Med. (2016) 32:1189–90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2814.2016.12.036

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Xie Q, Hua DP, Chen XW. Effect of acupoint injection on serum SP in patients with diabetes peripheral neuropathy andclinical observation. Jiangxi J Trad Chin Med. (2022) 53:57–9.

Google Scholar

34. Yang LM, Li SY, Zhu YB. Clinical study on 38 cases of diabetes peripheral neuropathy treated by point injection of mecobalamin. Hebei J Trad Chin Med. (2009) 31:421–2. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2619.2009.03.073

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Zhao CY, Zhang XW, Zhu JY, Wang M, Dou HY, Wang JC. Point injection of mecobalamin combined with intravenous infusion α-Therapeutic effect of lipoic acid on diabetes peripheral neuropathy. Shanxi Med J. (2016) 45:579–80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2016.05.033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Iqbal Z, Azmi S, Yadav R, Ferdousi M, Kumar M, Cuthbertson DJ, et al. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: epidemiology, diagnosis, and pharmacotherapy. Clin Ther. (2018) 40:828–49. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Han Y, Wang M, Shen J, Zhang Z, Zhao M, Huang J, et al. Differential efficacy of methylcobalamin and alpha-lipoic acid treatment on symptoms of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Minerva Endocrinol. (2018) 43:11–8. doi: 10.23736/S0391-1977.16.02505-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Zhang XY, Shi LJ, Wu YN, Li YY, Li XW, Huang TS. Effect of oral administration of Qinlian Yuyang decoction combined with acupoint injection of danshen injection on nsaids-related peptic ulcer with spleen and stomach damp-heat syndrome: 31 cases clinical observation. Shanxi J Trad Chin Med. (2022) 63:2046–51. doi: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2022.21.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Zhang MZ, Li N, Yu M. Clinical research progress of traditional chinese medicine in treating diabetes peripheral neuropathy. Shanxi J Trad Chin Med. (2021) 37:61–2. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7156.2021.02.027

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Tummanapalli SS, Willcox MDP, Issar T, Yan A, Pisarcikova J, Kwai N, et al. Tear film substance P: a potential biomarker for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Ocul Surf. (2019) 17:690–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2019.08.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Gylfadottir SS, Itani M, Kristensen AG, Tankisi H, Jensen TS, Sindrup SH, et al. Analysis of macrophages and peptidergic fibers in the skin of patients with painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. (2021) 9:e1111. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000001111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Jie FY, Zafar MI, Xu L, Shafqat RA, Gao F. Sensitivity of four simple methods to screen chinese patients for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Acta Endocrinol. (2018) 14:410–5. doi: 10.4183/aeb.2018.410

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Boulton AJM, Kubrusly DB, Bowker JH, Gadia MT, Quintera L, Becker DM, et al. Impaired vibratory perception and diabetic foot ulceration. Diabet Med. (1986) 3:335–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1986.tb00775.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Oh JE, Kim SN. Anti-inflammatory effects of acupuncture at ST36 point: a literature review in animal studies. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:813748. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.813748

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Wang LQ, Chen Z, Zhang K, Liang N, Yang GY, Lai L, et al. Zusanli (ST36) acupoint injection for diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Altern Complement Med. (2018) 24:1138–49. doi: 10.1089/acm.2018.0053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Pan H, Wang HF, Wang YF, Huang HP. Rules of acupoint selection for diabetic peripheral neuropathy based on data mining technology. Chin Acupun Moxibust. (2016) 36:1111–4. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2016.10.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Guo Y. Acupoint Injection Therapy. Beijing: China Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2013). p. 70–3.

Google Scholar

48. Bi JQ. Nursing and prevention of acupuncture fainting and adverse drug reactions caused by acupoint injection. China Pract Med. (2012) 7:201–2. doi: 10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2012.08.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Ruan JW, Li SM, Wen M, Rao ZD, Hu YH. Analysis on adverse effects of acupuncture in clinical practices. Chin Acupun Moxibust. (2009) 29:939–42.

Google Scholar

50. Zhao YJ, Ma HY, Cai DG. Clinical and mechanism research progress of acupoint catgut embedding and acupoint injection. Mod J Int Trad Chin Western Med. (2013) 22:784–7.

Google Scholar

51. Zhu YH, Chen YH. On effects of acupoints and drugs in acupoin-t injection treatment. Chin Acupun Moxibust. (2005) 1:50–2.

Google Scholar