Xinqing Hao
Xiaofeng Huang
Xiaoxue Yin1
Hai-Yang Wang
Zhanhua Liang
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
- 1Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- 2Department of Neurology, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, China
A corrigendum on
Elucidation of the mechanism underlying impaired sensorimotor gating in patients with primary blepharospasm using prepulse inhibition
by Hao, X., Huang, X., Yin, X., Wang, H. Y., Lu, R., Liang, Z., and Song, C. (2023). Front. Neurol. 14:1105483. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1105483
In the published article, there was an error in Figure 3 as published. For PPI200 the BSP value was written as “17.3 ± 14.6” but should have been “16.8 ± 14.4.” For PPI300 the HC value was written as “40.5 ± 20.0” but should have been “40.5 ± 19.8”. The corrected Figure 3 appears below.
FIGURE 3
Figure 3. Differences in PPI size between the HC and BSP groups. PPI120, prepulse inhibition at ISIs of 120 ms; PPI200, prepulse inhibition at ISIs of 200 ms; PPI300, prepulse inhibition at ISIs of 300 ms. All comparisons were performed using the independent-sample t-test. **p < 0.01.
In the published article, there were also errors in Figure 4 as published. For PPI120 the HC value was “39.1 ± 15.4” but should have been “37.4 ± 16.2.” For PPI200 the HC value was “50.1 ± 16.5” but should have been “49.8 ± 17.0.” For PPI300 the HC value was “41.8 ± 18.7” but should have been “40.5 ± 19.8.” The corrected Figure 4 appears below.
FIGURE 4
Figure 4. PPI size of the HC group at ISIs of 120, 200, and 300 ms. PPI120, prepulse inhibition at ISIs of 120 ms; PPI200, prepulse inhibition at ISIs of 200 ms; PPI300, prepulse inhibition at ISIs of 300 ms. The comparisons were performed using the one-way analysis of variance.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: primary blepharospasm, prepulse inhibition, blink reflex, sensory trick, sensorimotor integration
Citation: Hao X, Huang X, Yin X, Wang HY, Lu R, Liang Z and Song C (2023) Corrigendum: Elucidation of the mechanism underlying impaired sensorimotor gating in patients with primary blepharospasm using prepulse inhibition. Front. Neurol. 14:1174368. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1174368
Received: 26 February 2023; Accepted: 02 March 2023;
Published: 16 March 2023.
Edited and reviewed by: Anna Latorre, University College London, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2023 Hao, Huang, Yin, Wang, Lu, Liang and Song. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhanhua Liang, bGlhbmd6aGFuaHVhQGRtdS5lZHUuY24=; Chunli Song, Y2hsc2RhbGlhbkAxNjMuY29t
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship