Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Neurol., 12 April 2023
Sec. Endovascular and Interventional Neurology
This article is part of the Research Topic Endovascular and Interventional Neurology – Case Report Collection 2022 View all 23 articles

Case report: Late in-stent thrombosis in a patient with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia after stent-assisted coil embolization due to the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy

\nZhe JiZhe Ji1Wanxin YangWanxin Yang1Yongjie MaYongjie Ma1Lisong BianLisong Bian2Guilin LiGuilin Li1Yongjuan FuYongjuan Fu3Yueshan PiaoYueshan Piao3Hongqi Zhang
Hongqi Zhang1*
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 2Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Haidian Hospital, Peking University, Haidian, China
  • 3Department of Pathology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia (VBD) is a rare type of cerebrovascular disorder with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Due to the distinct pathological characteristics that fragmented internal elastic lamina and multiple dissections, VBD is difficult to treat and cured. Stent-assisted coil embolization is one of the main treatment modalities for such lesions. However, the duration of healing remained questionable, and there were no effective measures for evaluating endothelial coverage. Before complete endothelial coverage, the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy may lead to fatal in-stent thrombosis; however, continued antiplatelet therapy could also result in bleeding complications. Thus, we present an autopsy case of late in-stent thrombosis due to the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy and systematically review the literature to provide a reference for endovascular treatment and antiplatelet regimen of VBD.

Introduction

Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia (VBD) is a rare type of cerebrovascular disorder resulting in ectasia, elongation, and tortuosity of the vertebrobasilar artery. However, there are no current data on the exact incidence of VBD in the general population. Flemming et al. (1) assumed that the incidence was <0.05%, while Ince et al. (2) revealed that VBD was detected in ~2.06% of the first-ever stroke population. Patientswith VBD commonly present with ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and compression of the brainstem and/or cranial nerves (39), which could lead to high rates of morbidity and mortality (10). Among endovascular treatments, stent-assisted coil embolization is one of the main treatment modalities for VBD.

In-stent thrombosis is one of the most common complications after stent-assisted coil embolization, the rate of which is ~1.5% (1). Postoperative antiplatelet therapy is routinely administered to prevent the occurrence of in-stent thrombosis. However, the duration of post-procedure antiplatelet therapy remains questionable. Some studies provide recommendations for the optimal duration according to clinical experience, but there is no definite evidence of timing for the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy (2, 3). Thus, we present an autopsy case of late in-stent thrombosis due to the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy and systematically review the literature.

Case report

A 66-year-old man presented with hemifacial spasm on the left side and hemiplegic paralysis on the right side, as well as lower extremity weakness. CTA revealed ectasia, elongation, and tortuosity of the vertebrobasilar artery, which indicated VBD. T2-weighted MRI showed that the aberrant vertebrobasilar artery contributed to facial nerve compression, which corresponded to the clinical symptoms (Figure 1A). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was also performed, and the diagnosis of VBD was confirmed. Meanwhile, severe stenosis of the basilar artery was detected according to the 3D volume rending reconstructed image. 2D angiography of optimal view demonstrated the stenosis, but the degree of stenosis was less severe. Balloon angioplasty along with stent implantation was performed to treat the stenosis. Postoperative angiography showed that the stenosis was partly improved (Figures 1BE). Daily dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) including aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg was administrated postoperatively since then. Follow-up angiography was conducted 6 months later, which showed that the stenosis was improved while the existence of aneurysm remained. Stent-assisted coil embolization was performed to reduce the bleeding risk (Figures 1F, G). At 15 months after the endovascular treatment, follow-up angiography was performed and showed that an aneurysm-like protrusion of the VBD was occluded, but MRI indicated that facial nerve compression remained (Figures 1H, I). Furthermore, the patient complained of suffering from hemifacial spasms and desired further treatment. The surgical plan of microvascular decompression was then formulated. Because near-complete occlusion was observed in the recent angiography while DAPT was administrated continuously for ~2 years, DAPT was discontinued for 1 week before the operation to avoid the risk of perioperative bleeding without alternative short-term anticoagulation therapy. Adhesions between the tortious vertebral artery and the facial nerve were confirmed and dissected, and the operation was uneventful. Unfortunately, the patient presented with unconsciousness 8 h post-operation. A mobile bedside computed tomography (CT) scan was immediately performed and revealed cerebral infarction, while cerebrovascular ultrasound indicated the occlusion of the basilar artery, which highly indicated in-stent thrombosis.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. (A) Preoperative T2-weighted MRI showed facial nerve compression resulting from VBD (white arrow). (B) Standard frontal view of preoperative DSA also revealed ectasia, elongation, and tortuosity of the vertebrobasilar artery, and the diagnosis of VBD was confirmed. (C) 3D volume rending reconstructed image of preoperative DSA showed severe stenosis of the basilar artery (red arrow). (D) 2D angiography of optimal view of preoperative DSA demonstrated stenosis of the basilar artery, but the degree of stenosis was less severe (red arrow). (E) Postoperative angiography after balloon angioplasty along with stent implantation showed that the stenosis was partly improved (red arrow). (F) 6-month follow-up angiography showed that the stenosis of the basilar was improved (red arrow) while the aneurysm seemed enlarged (blue arrow). (G) Postoperative angiography after stent-assisted coils embolization showed that the aneurysm was occluded (blue arrow). (H) Follow-up angiography after stent-assisted coils embolization showed that an aneurysm-like protrusion of the VBD was occluded (blue arrow). (I) Follow-up MRI indicated facial nerve compression remained (white arrow).

An autopsy was performed with the agreement of relatives. Gross specimens of the vertebrobasilar system showed VBD with obvious protrusion located at the middle of the basilar artery, where stent-assisted coil embolization was performed. Brain stem compression caused by VBD could also be observed (Figure 2A). The specimen of the vertebrobasilar system was dissected separately, which was then chemically fixed and embedded in resin. Three specified regions of VBD, the proximal region, the distal region, and the apparent dilatated region were cut into sections, and microscopic observation was performed (Figure 2B). The section of the apparent dilatated region showed that the stent was suspended, and there was no vascular endothelium coverage on the surface (Figures 2C, D), which was evident and likely contributed to the in-stent thrombosis after the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy. For the proximal region, the stent was relatively adherent, and vascular endothelium or connective tissue coverage appeared above the stent (Figure 2E). For the distal region, even, smooth muscle coverage could be observed on the surface of the stent (Figure 2F).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. (A) Gross specimens of the vertebrobasilar system showed ectasia, elongation, and tortuosity of the vertebrobasilar artery accompanied by brain stem compression caused by VBD. (B) Schematic diagram of tissue slice position: the proximal region (E), distal region (F), and apparent dilatated region (C). (C) Light microscopy images from H–E staining (20×) of tissue slice of the apparent dilatated region: irregular intravascular lumen, loss of smooth muscle, and multiple thromboses among the dissection. (D) Locally magnified images (40×) focusing on the intravascular lumen of the section of the apparent dilatated region showed that the stent was suspended, and there was no vascular endothelium coverage on the surface (blue arrow). (E) Light microscopy images from H-E staining (40×) of tissue slice of the proximal region: the stent was relatively adherent, and vascular endothelium or connective tissue coverage appeared above the stent (red arrow). (F) Light microscopy images from H–E staining (40×) of tissue slice of the distal region: smooth muscle coverage could be observed above the stent (black arrow).

Discussion

In contrast to saccular aneurysms and regular dissecting aneurysms, VBD presents a fragmented internal elastic lamina combined with multiple dissections in pathology (4). The distinct pathological characteristics may account for why VBD is difficult to treat and takes longer to cure. In the past, conventional stent-assisted coil embolization or conventional stent implantation was used to treat VBD, but the efficacy was limited. LEO stents were proven to be an effective endovascular treatment modality in a previous study, which showed that most patients had good reconstruction of the target vessels and improvement of symptoms shortly after treatment (5). However, the results with long-term follow-up suggested that the clinical outcome was poor despite a good radiological outcome (6). Patients who presented with compressive symptoms had an even worse prognosis after endovascular treatment, which may not be beneficial for such patients (7). Recently, a flow diverter was used to treat VBD. Nevertheless, a systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that there were no statistically significant differences in favorable clinical outcomes, complete/near-complete occlusion, or complications between stent-assisted coiling and flow diverter groups in treating posterior circulation non-saccular aneurysms, which are similar to VBD (8). Furthermore, the morbidity and mortality rates of VBD patients who receive surgical treatment are also extremely high (9). Overall, the optimal treatment modality for VBD remains controversial.

In-stent thrombosis is one of the most common complications after stent-assisted coil embolization. A systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that ischemic/thromboembolic events and in-stent thrombosis were the most common complications, and the rate of in-stent thrombosis was ~1.5% (1). Postoperative antiplatelet therapy is routinely administered to prevent the occurrence of in-stent thrombosis. However, the duration of post-procedure antiplatelet therapy remains questionable. Early discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy may result in ischemic complications, while continuous antiplatelet therapy could increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications. For conventional stents, one retrospective study including 395 patients with 403 aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coil placement concluded that DAPT for more than 9 months and late switching to monotherapy are recommended for its prevention (2). Kim et al. suggested that longer-term DAPT (>9 months) should be considered after stent-assisted coil embolization for unruptured intracranial aneurysms, although its efficacy remains to be clarified (10). Noah Hong et al. (3) suggested that the optimal time to discontinue might be ~18–36 months after stent-assisted coil embolization. Large cohort-based studies or randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm these results. However, the earlier three studies had limitations because none of them provided data on the rates of major bleeding for patients treated with antiplatelet therapy. A prospective randomized multicenter trial was conducted to compare the effect of short-term (6 months) and long-term (12 months) DAPT on UIAs in patients undergoing stent-assisted coil embolization to find the optimal duration, and the results were highly anticipated (11). For flow diverters, a systematic review and pooled analysis indicated that a duration of post-procedure clopidogrel therapy <6 months was associated with greater rates of ischemic complications than a clopidogrel regimen of ≥6 months for pipeline embolization of cerebral aneurysms, while the duration of postprocedural high-dose ASA therapy was also not associated with ischemic complications (12). Another meta-analysis indicated that clopidogrel therapy ≤6 months is associated with higher rates of thrombotic events, but high-dose ASA >6 months is associated with fewer permanent thrombotic and hemorrhagic events (13). DAPT had been continuously administered for ~2 years for the case presented, which was much longer than the so-called long-term DAPT in previous studies. However, the fatal basilar thrombo-ischemic event still occurred. All the studies mentioned earlier only provide recommendations for the optimal duration based on clinical experience, but there is no definite evidence or guidelines for the timing of DAPT discontinuation.

None of the routine imaging examinations, such as CT, MR, or DSA, could evaluate the situation of endothelial coverage above the stent, so the evidence provided by these imaging examinations for the timing of DAPT discontinuation is limited. Currently, another imaging method is being used to evaluate cerebral vascular disease: optical coherence tomography (OCT). OCT images can show more features at the pathological level, especially stent apposition and neointima formation (14). A study of coronary stenting demonstrated that incomplete apposition led to a delay in neointimal coverage of the stent struts, activation of platelet function, and late stent thrombosis (15). The study by Rouchaud et al. (16) demonstrated that good wall apposition was a key factor for aneurysm occlusion after flow diverter treatment in a histological evaluation of rabbits. Guerrero et al. (17) described the assessment of the endothelial healing of recurrent intracranial aneurysms after treatment with a PED shield at 8 weeks post-implantation by using OCT. These findings corresponded to our pathological results, which provided valuable support for the perspective that the better the stent adherence is, the easier it is to be covered by the intima or even the muscular layer. When complete endothelial coverage was confirmed in OCT, antiplatelet therapy could be confidently discontinued, whereas for those patients with incomplete intimal coverage, longer or even lifelong medication may be necessary (18). Nevertheless, there were still some limitations to using OCT in the neurovascular field. Stiff catheters and tortuous intracranial arteries may result in iatrogenic dissection and poor imaging quality (19, 20).

Conclusion

This case indicated that the discontinuation of long-term antiplatelet therapy for VBD patients treated with stent-assisted coil embolization could be a cause of late in-stent thrombosis and subsequent cerebral infarction, which may result in poor clinical outcomes. In regard to patients with VBD, the safety of discontinuation of long-term DAPT after endovascular treatment should be carefully considered.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual's legal guardian/next of kin for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

ZJ, WY, and YM drafted and revised the manuscript and were involved in the acquisition of data. ZJ and WY contributed equally to the manuscript. LB was involved in the acquisition of data. YF and YP performed the autopsy. GL and HZ supervised and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Key Research Development Program grant number 2016YFC1300800 and Beijing Scientific and Technologic Project grant number Z201100005520021.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Cagnazzo F, Cappucci M, Lefevre P-H, Dargazanli C, Gascou G, Morganti R, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with self-expandable braided stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2018) 39:2064–9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5804

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Hwang G, Kim JG, Song KS, Lee YJ, Villavicencio JB, Suroto NS, et al. Delayed ischemic stroke after stent-assisted coil placement in cerebral aneurysm: characteristics and optimal duration of preventative dual antiplatelet therapy. Radiology. (2014) 273:194–201. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Hong N, Cho YD, Kim HS, Pang CH, Yoo DH, Kim JE, et al. Is it safe to discontinue antiplatelet medication after stent-assisted coil embolization? If so, when is the best time? J Neuroradiol. (2022) 50:54–8. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2022.03.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Mizutani T, Miki Y, Kojima H, Suzuki H. Proposed classification of nonatherosclerotic cerebral fusiform and dissecting aneurysms. Neurosurgery. (1999) 45:253–9; discussion 259–260.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

5. He X, Duan C, Zhang J, Li X, Zhang X, Li Z. The safety and efficacy of using large woven stents to treat vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia. J Neurointerv Surg. (2019) 11:1162–6. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014933

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Wu X, Xu Y, Hong B, Zhao WY, Huang QH, Liu JM. Endovascular reconstruction for treatment of vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia: long-term outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2013) 34:583–8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3248

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Wang J, Jia L, Yang X, Jia X, Liu J, Liu P, et al. Outcomes in symptomatic patients with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia following endovascular treatment. Front Neurol. (2019) 10:610. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00610

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Domingo RA, Tripathi S, Perez-Vega C, Vivas-Buitrago T, Lu VM, Todnem ND, et al. Treatment of posterior circulation non-saccular aneurysms with flow diversion vs. stent-assisted coiling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. (2021) 13:159–63. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016294

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Nakatomi H, Kiyofuji S, Ono H, Tanaka M, Kamiyama H, Takizawa K, et al. Giant fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms of the basilar trunk and vertebrobasilar junction-clinicopathological and surgical outcome. Neurosurgery. (2020) 88:82–95. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa317

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kim T, Kim CH, Kang SH, Ban SP, Kwon OK. Relevance of antiplatelet therapy duration after stent-assisted coil embolization for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. World Neurosurg. (2018) 116:e699–708. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Ban SP, Kwon O-K, Kim YD, Kim B-T, Oh JS, Kim KM, et al. Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after stent-assisted coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective randomized multicenter trial. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. (2022) 65:765–71. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2022.0082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Saber H, Kherallah RY, Hadied MO, Kazemlou S, Chamiraju P, Narayanan S. Antiplatelet therapy and the risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications associated with Pipeline embolization of cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and pooled analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. (2019) 11:362–6. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Skukalek SL, Winkler AM, Kang J, Dion JE, Cawley CM, Webb A, et al. Effect of antiplatelet therapy and platelet function testing on hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device: a review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. (2016) 8:58–65. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011145

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. John S, Bain MD, Hui FK, Hussain MS, Masaryk TJ, Rasmussen PA, et al. Long-term follow-up of in-stent stenosis after pipeline flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. (2016) 78:862–7. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Dorval JF, Richer LP, Soucie L, McSpadden LC, Hoopai A, Tan S, et al. Electroanatomical navigation to minimize contrast medium or X-rays during stenting: insights from an experimental model. JACC Basic Transl Sci. (2022) 7:131–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.11.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Rouchaud A, Ramana C, Brinjikji W, Ding Y-H, Dai D, Gunderson T, et al. Wall apposition is a key factor for aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion: a histologic evaluation in 41 rabbits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2016) 37:2087–91. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4848

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Guerrero BP, Pacheco CD, Saied A, Joshi K, Rodríguez C, Martínez-Galdámez M, et al. First human evaluation of endothelial healing after a pipeline flex embolization device with shield technology implanted in posterior circulation using optical coherence tomography. Neurointervention. (2018) 13:129–32. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2018.01032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Li L, Yongjie M, Dmytriw AA, Jian R, Hongqi Z. Evaluation of vessel wall apposition for stent-assisted coiling in treatment of vertebral artery aneurysms using optical coherence tomography. Clin Neuroradiol. (2022) 32:565–70. doi: 10.1007/s00062-021-01070-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Yang B, Feng Y, Ma Y, Wang Y, Chen J, Li L, et al. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: feasibility, safety, and preliminary experience. Front Neurol. (2021) 12:678443. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.678443

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Sun C, Nolte F, Cheng KHY, Vuong B, Lee KKC, Standish BA, et al. In vivo feasibility of endovascular Doppler optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express. (2012) 3:2600–10. doi: 10.1364/BOE.3.002600

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: aneurysm—dissecting, stent assisted coil embolization, thrombosis, case report, autopsy

Citation: Ji Z, Yang W, Ma Y, Bian L, Li G, Fu Y, Piao Y and Zhang H (2023) Case report: Late in-stent thrombosis in a patient with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia after stent-assisted coil embolization due to the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy. Front. Neurol. 14:1129816. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1129816

Received: 22 December 2022; Accepted: 20 March 2023;
Published: 12 April 2023.

Edited by:

Carlo Setacci, University of Siena, Italy

Reviewed by:

Faliang Gao, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, China
Kun Zhang, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, China

Copyright © 2023 Ji, Yang, Ma, Bian, Li, Fu, Piao and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hongqi Zhang, xwzhanghq@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.