Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 13 April 2023
Sec. Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology

Association of body mass index and physical activity with fatigue, depression, and anxiety among Iranian patients with multiple sclerosis

Nasim Rezaeimanesh\r\n,\r\nNasim Rezaeimanesh1 ,2 Pegah Rafiee\r\n,\r\nPegah Rafiee1 ,2 Roghayyeh Saeedi\r\nRoghayyeh Saeedi2 Sharareh Eskandarieh\r\nSharareh Eskandarieh2 Mohammad Ali Sahraian\r\nMohammad Ali Sahraian2 Pegah Khosravian\r\nPegah Khosravian3 Maryam Abolhasani\r\n,\r\nMaryam Abolhasani4 ,2 Soodeh Razeghi Jahromi\r\n,\r\n\r\n
\r\n&#x;&#x;Soodeh Razeghi Jahromi1 ,2 * Abdorreza Naser Moghadasi
&#x;&#x;Abdorreza Naser Moghadasi2*
  • 1Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 2Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 3Medical Plants Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
  • 4Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Introduction: Depression, fatigue, and anxiety are three common clinical comorbidities of multiple sclerosis (MS). We investigated the role of physical activity (PA) level and body mass index (BMI) as modifiable lifestyle factors in these three comorbidities.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the MS specialist clinic of Sina Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Demographic and clinical data were collected. BMI was categorized in accordance with the WHO’s standard classification. Physical activity (PA) level and sitting time per day were obtained using the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF). Fatigue, anxiety, and depression scores were measured using the Persian version of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Beck’s Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) questionnaires, respectively. The correlation between the metabolic equivalent of tasks (MET), BMI, and daily sitting hours with depression, anxiety, and fatigue were checked using the linear regression test. The normal BMI group was considered a reference, and the difference in quantitative variables between the reference and the other groups was assessed using an independent sample t-test. Physical activity was classified with tertiles, and the difference in depression, anxiety, and fatigue between the PA groups was evaluated by a one-way ANOVA test.

Results: In total, 85 MS patients were recruited for the study. The mean ± SD age of the participants was 39.07 ± 8.84 years, and 72.9% (n: 62) of them were female. The fatigue score was directly correlated with BMI (P: 0.03; r: 0.23) and sitting hours per day (P: 0.01; r: 0.26) and indirectly correlated with PA level (P < 0.01; r: −0.33). Higher depression scores were significantly correlated with elevated daily sitting hours (P: 0.01; r: 0.27). However, the correlation between depression with PA and BMI was not meaningful (p > 0.05). Higher anxiety scores were correlated with BMI (P: 0.01; r: 0.27) and lower PA (P: 0.01; r: −0.26). The correlation between anxiety and sitting hours per day was not significant (p > 0.05). Patients in the type I obesity group had significantly higher depression scores than the normal weight group (23.67 ± 2.30 vs. 14.05 ± 9.12; P: 0.001). Fatigue (32.61 ± 14.18 vs. 52.40 ± 12.42; P: <0.01) and anxiety (14.66 ± 9.68 vs. 27.80 ± 15.48; P: 0.01) scores were significantly greater among participants in the type II obesity group in comparison with the normal weight group. Fatigue (P: 0.01) and anxiety (P: 0.03) scores were significantly different in the three levels of PA, but no significant difference was found in the depression score (P: 0.17).

Conclusion: Our data suggest that a physically active lifestyle and being in the normal weight category are possible factors that lead to lower depression, fatigue, and anxiety in patients with MS.

Introduction

There is a reported prevalence of 2.5 million cases of multiple sclerosis (MS) worldwide (1). The estimated point prevalence of MS in Tehran, the capital city of Iran, was 167.54 individuals per 100.000 in 2020. Moreover, according to the increasing trend of MS prevalence, it is predicted that it will reach 220.84 per 100.000 individuals in 2029 (2). While the disease can begin at any age, the most common age of onset is between 20 and 40 years old (1).

MS patients may present various symptoms, including cognitive, psychiatric, sensory, motor, urinary, and vision, which may affect their quality of life. Depression, fatigue, and anxiety are three typical clinical manifestations of motor and psychiatric comorbidities, and their treatment has not been well established until now (1, 3). The prevalence of depression and anxiety in MS patients is reported to be 27.01 and 35.19%, respectively, and for fatigue, the prevalence ranges from 36.5 to 78.0% in different studies (3, 4). Anxiety and depression affect the occupational and social aspects of an MS patient’s life (3). On the other hand, fatigue may impact the patient’s capacity to work, employment status, and sick leave (4). MS mainly occurs among the young working-age population and could affect different aspects of their lives through its symptoms and comorbidities. Thus, many physicians use symptom therapies to improve MS patients’ quality of life.

To date, MS has no definite treatment. Hence, studies focusing on the modifiable environmental or lifestyle risk factors of MS or its comorbidities are highly regarded. Weight and physical activity are two samples of lifestyle factors. Obesity and low physical activity are linked with the risk of very chronic disorders through the inflammatory pathways and multiple sclerosis (5–8).

The available evidence has mentioned the association between obesity and higher clinical disability in MS patients (9). Still, data on the association between obesity and depression, fatigue, and anxiety scores among MS patients are controversial (10, 11).

Unfortunately, disability in movement, fear regarding safety, reluctance to participate in activities, and doubt in the ability to engage in physical activities, etc., cause significantly lower activity in MS patients compared with the healthy population (12). However, it seems that PA could have beneficial effects on physical symptoms and cognitive ability and improve the quality of life of MS patients (13). On the other hand, until now, only a few studies have investigated the correlation between the physical activity level of patients with MS and their scores of depression, fatigue, and anxiety, which are contentious too (11, 14–16).

Due to the impacts of MS comorbidities on the various aspects of patients’ lives that result in a decreasing quality of life (4), the increasing prevalence of MS worldwide (17), and the lack of definite treatment for these comorbidities (17), it is necessary to investigate the factors affecting these common comorbidities to improve patients’ quality of life. PA and BMI are modifiable lifestyle factors, and data on the association between them and depression, fatigue, and anxiety among MS patients are modest and inconsistent (10, 11, 14–16). To our knowledge, no study has mentioned the correlation between daily sitting hours and these comorbidities. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to investigate the association of BMI, PA, and sitting time per day with depression, fatigue, and anxiety among Iranian patients with MS.

Materials and methods

Study population

A cross-sectional study was performed in the MS specialist clinic of Sina Hospital, Tehran, Iran, from December 2021 to September 2022. In total, 85 patients with MS among the patients referred to this clinic during the study period were interested in participating in the study, met the inclusion criteria, and were enrolled.

The definite diagnosis of MS was performed according to the revised McDonald criteria 2017 (18) and neurologist confirmation. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age between 18 and 55 years old; Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at less than 5.5; educational status of diploma or higher; not having any other neurological disorder apart from MS; not having other chronic diseases such as chronic gastrointestinal, liver, kidney, heart, respiratory, and cancer diseases; not receiving treatment for depression; not being on a special diet; more than 1 year since diagnosis; more than 1 month since the last corticosteroid pulse therapy and the last relapse; and not being pregnant or lactating.

Patients’ consent and protocol approval

The study method and aims were described for the participants, and they themselves completed the written consent. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science under the ethics number: IR.SBMU.nnftri.Rec.1400.096.

Data collection

Demographic and clinical data were collected by a personal information form during in-person interviews. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was calculated by an expert neurologist during the patients’ examination. Weight and height were obtained using a Seka scale with minimal clothing and an accuracy of 100 grams and a tape measure with an accuracy of 0.5 cm, respectively. BMI was calculated by the weight (kg)/[height (m)]2 formula. BMI was categorized considering the World Health Organization’s (WHO) standard classification of underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (BMI ≥ 18.5 and < 25), overweight (BMI ≥ 25 and < 30), obesity type I (BMI ≥ 30 and < 35), and obesity type II (BMI ≥ 35) (19).

The International Physical Activity Questionnaire–Short Form (IPAQ-SF) was used to assess physical activity levels and sitting hours per day (20). The metabolic equivalent of tasks (MET) was calculated using the frequency and duration of physical activity and was reported as MET-min/wk. (21).

Fatigue, anxiety, and depression scores were measured using the Persian version of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) (22), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) (23), and Beck’s Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) (24) questionnaires, respectively.

BDI-II is a 21-item self-administered multiple-choice questionnaire that measures depression severity over the past 2 weeks. Each of the 21 symptoms is rated from 0 to 1, and a total score is obtained from the summation of all items (25). The scoring cut points used according to the manual for the BDI–II are as follows: 0–13 minimal range, 14–19 mild, 20–28 moderate, and 29–63 severe.

FSS is a nine-item scale in which each item rates between 1 = strongly disagree and 7 = strongly agree and a total score of 9 to 63, and it assesses fatigue intensity over the past 2 weeks. The higher the FSS score, the more severe the fatigue. The considered cut-off values were as follows: <36 = no-to-mild fatigue, 36–52 = moderate fatigue, and >52 = severe fatigue (26).

BAI refers to the 21 clinical symptoms of cognitive and physical anxiety experienced by the participants over the last week. The respondent can choose one of the four options of “not at all: 0,” “mild: 1,” “moderate: 2,” and “severe: 3” for each item. The total score may range from 0 to 63: 0–7 (minimal anxiety level), 8–15 (mild anxiety), 16–25 (moderate anxiety), and 26–63 (severe anxiety) (27, 28).

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using SPSS 26 software. The normal distribution of variables was examined by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The correlation between MET, BMI, and sitting hours per day with depression, anxiety, and fatigue were checked using the linear regression test. Further analysis was conducted by adjusting the linear regression model for age, gender, marital and employment status, educational level, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption status, MS type, MS drug, disease duration, EDSS, and relapse rate. The normal BMI group was considered a reference, and the difference in quantitative variables between the reference and each of the other groups was assessed using the independent sample t-test. Physical activity was classified with tertiles and labeled low, medium, and high physical activity. The difference in depression, anxiety, and fatigue between PA groups was evaluated with a one-way ANOVA test. A value of p of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. For the ANOVA post hoc, P < 0.016 was considered statistically significant considering the Bonferroni correction.

Results

In total, 85 MS patients were recruited for the present study. The mean ± SD age of participants was 39.07 ± 8.84 years old, and 72.9% (n: 62) of them were women. A total of 62.4% (n: 53) of the patients suffered from relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS), 32.9% (n: 28) had secondary progressive MS (SPMS), and the others had the primary progressive type of MS. The mean ± SD of EDSS, annual attack rate, and disease duration of the patients were 3.1 ± 1.72, 0.7 ± 1.4, and 11.8 ± 6.3 years, respectively. The delay between the first onset of MS and the definite diagnosis was 0.92 ± 2.14 years. A total of 57 (67.1%) participants were married, and 22 (25.9%) were single; 38.8% (n: 33) had bachelor’s degrees, and 34.1% (n: 29) had diploma degrees; 42 (49.4%) were unemployed, and 78.5% (n: 33) were housekeepers; 16 (18.8%) were cigarette smokers, the same number as alcohol consumers. Most of the participants were receiving ocrelizumab (n: 55; 64.7%) as MS treatment, followed by natalizumab (n: 25; 29.4%), fingolimod (n: 3; 3.5%), rituximab (n: 1; 1.2%), and dimethyl fumarate (n: 1; 1.2%) (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of participants.

As demonstrated in Table 2, the study participants had a mean ± SD BMI, MET, and sitting hours per day of 24.9 ± 4.8 kg/m2, 918.9 ± 1359.4 MET-min/wk., and 5.6 ± 3.2 h, respectively. The largest number of patients was in the mild fatigue (n: 37; 43.5%), minimal depression (n: 35; 41.2%), and mild anxiety (n: 26; 30.6%) categories. More details on depression, fatigue, and anxiety categorization and the mean ± SD are also reported in this table.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Descriptive statistics of participants.

Table 3 presents the correlation of modifiable lifestyle factors, including BMI, PA level, and sitting time per day, with depression, anxiety, and fatigue in MS patients. Higher BMI (P unadjusted: 0.03, r: 0.23; P adjusted: 0.03, r: 0.26) and sitting time (P unadjusted: 0.01, r: 0.26; P adjusted: 0.01, r: 0.31) showed a significant direct correlation with fatigue. Meanwhile, this significant correlation was indirect in the case of the PA level and fatigue (P unadjusted <0.01, r: −0.33; P adjusted: 0.03, r: −0.25). Even though the depression score directly correlated with BMI and demonstrated an adverse correlation with the PA level, these correlations were not significant (p > 0.05). Higher sitting time per day was correlated with a higher depression score (P unadjusted: 0.01, r: 0.27; P adjusted<0.01, r: 0.31). The analysis regarding anxiety indicated that higher BMI (P unadjusted: 0.01, r: 0.27; P adjusted<0.01, r: 0.37) and sitting time per day (P adjusted: 0.03, r: 0.26) as well as a lower PA level (P unadjusted: 0.01, r: −0.26) are correlated with higher anxiety among MS patients.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. The correlation of body mass index, physical activity, and sitting hours per day with fatigue, depression, and anxiety.

The differences in depression, fatigue, and anxiety scores between the normal weight group of BMI and other categories are highlighted in Table 4. The patients in the type I obesity group had significantly higher depression scores than those in the normal weight group (23.67 ± 2.30 vs. 14.05 ± 9.12; P: 0.001). Fatigue (32.61 ± 14.18 vs. 52.40 ± 12.42; P: <0.01) and anxiety (14.66 ± 9.68 vs. 27.80 ± 15.48; P: 0.01) scores were significantly greater among participants in the type II obesity group in comparison with the normal weight group.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. The difference in fatigue, anxiety, and depression scores between BMI categories.

Table 5 reports the differences in depression, fatigue, and anxiety scores between PA-level stratifications. The fatigue (P: 0.01) and anxiety (P: 0.03) scores were significantly different in the three levels of PA, but no significant difference was found in the depression score (P: 0.17). The mean ± SD of the fatigue score at the low PA level was 42.42 ± 16.15 vs. 30.71 ± 12.32 at the high PA level (P: 0.01).

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. The difference in fatigue, anxiety, and depression scores between physical activity categories.

The correlation between depression, anxiety, and fatigue is reported in Graph 1. Significant direct correlations were found for depression and fatigue (P: <0.0; r: 0.61), depression and anxiety (P: <0.0; r: 0.64), and fatigue and anxiety (P: <0.0; r: 0.61).

GRAPH 1

Discussion

In the present study, we investigated three modifiable lifestyle factors (BMI, PA, and sitting time per day) as influencing factors on three common comorbidities of MS, including depression, fatigue, and anxiety. Our data suggest that a lower BMI (i.e., having a normal BMI) may have protective effects on depression, fatigue, and anxiety. Being physically active is associated with lower fatigue and anxiety, and higher daily sitting hours are related to higher depression scores and more fatigue. These results support the importance of weight control in MS patients to improve their symptoms and quality of life.

We reported a correlation of lower physical activity and higher sitting time per day with some MS comorbidities, but the cause and effect are not clear in this correlation. Although depression, fatigue, and movement disability are among the barriers to physical activity in MS patients (12), investigations have highlighted the beneficial effects of physical activity and exercise on depression, fatigue, and anxiety improvement (29). In 2020, the US National MS Society mentioned the safety of exercise and lifestyle physical activity for MS patients, approved the beneficial effects of physical activity for disease, management of symptoms, overall health, and quality of life of MS patients, and provided physical activity and exercise recommendations for patients with different physical abilities from EDSS 0 to 9 (12). Neurologists and other healthcare providers could use this recommendation based on patients’ abilities, needs, and preferences.

Being overweight and obese are common comorbidities of MS that could be associated with low physical activity and a sedentary lifestyle (30). In other words, one of the effective strategies for weight loss and combating the secondary effects of obesity in MS patients is increasing the level of physical activity (30).

Both obesity and physical inactivity are reported as MS risk factors (8, 30). One proposed mechanism for preventing the effects of physical activity for MS risk is causing an increment in T regulatory cells, a decrease in the secretion of immunoglobulin, a shift of the Th1/Th2 balance, and a reduction in inflammation (8). In addition, exercise could protect MS by modulating immune factors and stress hormones (8). It seems the underlying mechanism in the association between obesity and elevated risk of MS refers to a significant increase in leptin level as an adipose tissue hormone that has a role in adaptive and innate immunity (31). Furthermore, a higher number of interleukin (IL)-6-, IL-17-, IL-2-, IL-15-, TNF-α-, and IFN-γ-producing cells is reported in overweight and obese MS patients compared to patients with normal weight. Increased production of these inflammatory cytokines is mentioned in the presence of leptin (31). In a recent study, the elevation of pro-inflammatory molecules such as IL-6 and leptins, as well as a reduction in anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-13, has been shown in the central nervous system (CNS) of obese MS patients (31).

The role of obesity and low physical activity in increasing inflammation has been proven in the general population and MS patients (6, 8, 32). On the other hand, it seems that one of the proposed mechanisms for depression, anxiety, and fatigue in MS patients is cytokine storm and the peripheral and central inflammatory and immunological pathways (33–35). Therefore, it could be concluded that elevated inflammation resulting from obesity and physical inactivity is the mediating mechanism of their correlation with depression, fatigue, and anxiety.

There is a hypothesis on the interrelationship between anxiety, fatigue, and depression among MS patients. Anxiety is a powerful factor in the development of depression among MS patients, and it is recommended for the initial assessment of anxiety to prevent and diagnose depression (36). In addition, it seems that depression is highly correlated with some other comorbidities of MS, including fatigue; thus, successful treatment of depression could result in a reduction in fatigue in patients with MS (35). Our results confirm these interactions, and we reported significant two-by-two correlations of depression, anxiety, and fatigue. It may be assumed that finding an approach to improve or prevent any of these may lead to the improvement of the others. Our study recommends having a healthy lifestyle, including increasing physical activity, lowering sitting time per day, and having a weight in the normal BMI range, to improve depression, anxiety, and fatigue in MS patients.

While the research regarding the effects of physical exercise on depression, fatigue, and anxiety is modest, most of the available studies report the beneficial role of higher physical activity in improving depression and fatigue in patients with MS, in line with our results (37, 38). Existing data on anxiety are controversial (16). In addition, increasing physical activity with an effect on weight loss may have additional beneficial effects on improving MS comorbidities. Therefore, recommending an active lifestyle may be beneficial to increase the quality of life of MS patients.

According to the American College of Sports Medicine Position Statement guideline, which seems to be useful for MS patients, individuals are recommended to engage in “150–250 min per week of moderate-intensity physical activity for preventing weight gain and reducing the risk of chronic diseases, and between 225 and 420 min per week of moderate-intensity physical activity for weight loss” (30).

Conclusion

Considering the reduction in quality of life of MS patients and the impact of the disease on various dimensions of their personal, social, and occupational lives, studies on modifiable lifestyle factors in MS patients to increase their quality of life have been of great interest in recent years. The present study suggests a healthy lifestyle, which consists of having a normal weight and an active lifestyle (lower sitting hours per day and higher physical activity) as correlating factors to improve the motor and psychiatric comorbidities of MS and eventually improve the patients’ quality of life.

Limitation

No blood samples were collected in this study, and the correlation of pro-inflammatory mediators was not investigated. It appears to be necessary to carry out future studies to find the mediating mechanisms of the observed relationships.

The current study is a cross-sectional study that only shows the relationship between the variables, and the exposure and outcome are unknown. Therefore, it is suggested that clinical studies should be designed and implemented to more closely examine the effectiveness of increasing physical activity and weight control on addressing the comorbidities of MS.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science by the ethic number: IR.SBMU.nnftri.Rec.1400.096. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

NR: hypothesis, data collection, methodology, data entry and analysis, manuscript writing, and manuscript reviewing. PR: data collection, data entry, and manuscript reviewing. RS: methodology and data collection. SE: methodology, analysis, and manuscript reviewing. MS: supervision, data collection, and manuscript reviewing. PK: methodology and manuscript reviewing. MA: data collection and manuscript reviewing. SR: hypothesis, supervision, methodology, data collection, and manuscript writing and reviewing. AN: hypothesis, supervision, methodology, data collection, and manuscript writing and reviewing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was funded by the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, grant number 29983.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Tafti, D, Ehsan, M, and Xixis, KL. Multiple Sclerosis. Stat Pearls. Treasure Island, FL: Stat Pearls Publishing.

Google Scholar

2. Eskandarieh, S, Sahraian, MA, and Ayoubi, S. Prevalence of MS in Tehran, Iran in 2020 and its forecast for the next 10 years. Mult Scler Relat Disord. (2022) 59:103584. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103584

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Peres, DS, Rodrigues, P, Viero, FT, Frare, JM, Kudsi, SQ, Meira, GM, et al. Prevalence of depression and anxiety in the different clinical forms of multiple sclerosis and associations with disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun. (2022) 24:100484. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2022.100484

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Oliva Ramirez, A, Keenan, A, Kalau, O, Worthington, E, Cohen, L, and Singh, S. Prevalence and burden of multiple sclerosis-related fatigue: a systematic literature review. BMC Neurol. (2021) 21:468. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02396-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Keramat, SA, Alam, K, Rana, RH, Chowdhury, R, Farjana, F, Hashmi, R, et al. Obesity and the risk of developing chronic diseases in middle-aged and older adults: findings from an Australian longitudinal population survey, 2009–2017. PLoS One. (2021) 16:e0260158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260158

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Guo, X, Zhang, T, Shi, L, Gong, M, Jin, J, Zhang, Y, et al. The relationship between lipid phytochemicals, obesity and its related chronic diseases. Food Funct. (2018) 9:6048–62. doi: 10.1039/C8FO01026A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Schreiner, TG, and Genes, TM. Obesity and multiple sclerosis-A multifaceted association. J Clin Med. (2021) 10:2689–702. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122689

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Li, C, Lin, J, Yang, T, Xiao, Y, Jiang, Q, and Shang, H. Physical activity and risk of multiple sclerosis: a Mendelian randomization study. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:872126. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.872126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Stampanoni Bassi, M, Iezzi, E, Buttari, F, Gilio, L, Simonelli, I, Carbone, F, et al. Obesity worsens central inflammation and disability in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. (2020) 26:1237–46. doi: 10.1177/1352458519853473

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Marck, CH, Neate, SL, Taylor, KL, Weiland, TJ, and Jelinek, GA. Prevalence of comorbidities, overweight and obesity in an international sample of people with multiple sclerosis and associations with modifiable lifestyle factors. PLoS One. (2016) 11:e0148573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148573

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Aykin Yiğman, Z, Karaahmet, ÖZ, Avşar Ertürk, F, and Yiğman, F. A short-term exercise program in patients with multiple sclerosis: is body mass index important? Int J Rehabil Res. (2021) 44:138–43. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000462

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kalb, R, Brown, TR, Coote, S, Costello, K, Dalgas, U, Garmon, E, et al. Exercise and lifestyle physical activity recommendations for people with multiple sclerosis throughout the disease course. Mult Scler. (2020) 26:1459–69. doi: 10.1177/1352458520915629

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Fasczewski, KS, Gill, DL, and Rothberger, SM. Physical activity motivation and benefits in people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. (2018) 40:1517–23. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1300946

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Motl, RW, and Sandroff, BM. Randomized controlled trial of physical activity intervention effects on fatigue and depression in multiple sclerosis: secondary analysis of data from persons with elevated symptom status. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. (2020) 17:100521. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100521

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Rzepka, M, Toś, M, Boroń, M, Gibas, K, and Krzystanek, E. Relationship between fatigue and physical activity in a polish cohort of multiple sclerosis patients. Medicina. (2020) 56:726. doi: 10.3390/medicina56120726

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Gascoyne, C, Karahalios, A, Demaneuf, T, and Marck, C. Effect of exercise interventions on anxiety in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J MS Care. (2020) 22:103–9. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2019-009R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Walton, C, King, R, Rechtman, L, Kaye, W, Leray, E, Marrie, RA, et al. Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: Insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition. Mult Scler. (2020) 26:1816–21. doi: 10.1177/1352458520970841

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Thompson, AJ, Banwell, BL, Barkhof, F, Carroll, WM, Coetzee, T, Comi, G, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. (2018) 17:162–73. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Lee, PH, Macfarlane, DJ, Lam, TH, and Stewart, SM. Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2011) 8:115. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Mousavi, B, Bathaie, SZ, Fadai, F, Ashtari, Z, Farhang, S, Hashempour, S, et al. Safety evaluation of saffron stigma (Crocus sativus L.) aqueous extract and crocin in patients with schizophrenia. Avicenna J Phytomed. (2015) 5:413–9.

Google Scholar

22. Azimian, M, Farahani, AS, Dadkhah, A, Fallahpour, M, and Karimlu, M. Fatigue severity scale: the psychometric properties of the Persian-version in patients with multiple sclerosis. Res J Biol Sci. (2009) 4:974–7.

Google Scholar

23. Kaviani, H, and Mousavi, A. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Beck anxiety inventory (BAI). Tehran Univ Med J. (2008) 66:136–40.

Google Scholar

24. Stefan-Dabson, K, Mohammadkhani, P, and Massah-Choulabi, O. Psychometrics characteristic of beck depression inventory-II in patients with Magor depressive disorder. Arch. Rehabilit. (2007) 8:82–08.

Google Scholar

25. Beck, AT, Steer, RA, and Brown, G. Beck depression inventory–II. Psychol Assess. (1996).

Google Scholar

26. Gustavsen, S, Olsson, A, Søndergaard, H, Andresen, S, Sørensen, PS, Sellebjerg, F, et al. The association of selected multiple sclerosis symptoms with disability and quality of life: a large Danish self-report survey. BMC Neurol. (2021) 21:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02344-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Beck, AT, Epstein, N, Brown, G, and Steer, RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. (1988) 56:893–7. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Rector, NA, and Arnold, PD. Chapter 7 – Assessment of patients with anxiety disorders In: DS Goldbloom, editor. Psychiatric clinical skills. Philadelphia: Mosby (2006). 71–89.

Google Scholar

29. Pilutti, LA, Dlugonski, D, Sandroff, BM, Klaren, R, and Motl, RW. Randomized controlled trial of a behavioral intervention targeting symptoms and physical activity in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. (2014) 20:594–601. doi: 10.1177/1352458513503391

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Mokhtarzade, M, Agha-Alinejad, H, Motl, RW, Negaresh, R, Baker, JS, and Zimmer, P. Weight control and physical exercise in people with multiple sclerosis: current knowledge and future perspectives. Complement Ther Med. (2019) 43:240–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.02.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Huitema, MJD, and Schenk, GJ. Insights into the mechanisms that may clarify obesity as a risk factor for multiple sclerosis. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. (2018) 18:18. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0827-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Schmidt, FM, Weschenfelder, J, Sander, C, Minkwitz, J, Thormann, J, Chittka, T, et al. Inflammatory cytokines in general and central obesity and modulating effects of physical activity. PLoS One. (2015) 10:e0121971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121971

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Manjaly, ZM, Harrison, NA, Critchley, HD, Do, CT, Stefanics, G, Wenderoth, N, et al. Pathophysiological and cognitive mechanisms of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2019) 90:642–51. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-320050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Platero, JL, Cuerda-Ballester, M, Ibáñez, V, Sancho, D, Lopez-Rodríguez, MM, Drehmer, E, et al. The impact of coconut oil and epigallocatechin gallate on the levels of IL-6, anxiety and disability in multiple sclerosis patients. Nutrients. (2020) 12:305–15. doi: 10.3390/nu12020305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Solaro, C, Gamberini, G, and Masuccio, FG. Depression in multiple sclerosis: epidemiology, aetiology, diagnosis and treatment CNS. Drugs. (2018) 32:117–33. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0489-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Văcăraș, V, Văcăraș, V, Nistor, C, Văcăraș, D, Opre, AN, Blaga, P, et al. The influence of depression and anxiety on neurological disability in multiple sclerosis patients. Behav Neurol. (2020) 2020:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2020/6738645

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Stephens, S, Shams, S, Lee, J, Grover, SA, Longoni, G, Berenbaum, T, et al. Benefits of physical activity for depression and fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal analysis. J Pediatr. (2019) 209:226–32.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.01.040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Feinstein, A, Magalhaes, S, Richard, J-F, Audet, B, and Moore, C. The link between multiple sclerosis and depression. Nat Rev Neurol. (2014) 10:507–17. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.139

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: multiple sclerosis, fatigue, depression, anxiety, physical activity, body mass index

Citation: Rezaeimanesh N, Rafiee P, Saeedi R, Eskandarieh S, Sahraian MA, Khosravian P, Abolhasani M, Razeghi Jahromi S and Naser Moghadasi A (2023) Association of body mass index and physical activity with fatigue, depression, and anxiety among Iranian patients with multiple sclerosis. Front. Neurol. 14:1126215. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1126215

Received: 17 December 2022; Accepted: 15 March 2023;
Published: 13 April 2023.

Edited by:

Steve Simpson-Yap, The University of Melbourne, Australia

Reviewed by:

Omid Beiki, Karolinska Institutet (KI), Sweden
Rocco Capuano, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Italy

Copyright © 2023 Rezaeimanesh, Rafiee, Saeedi, Eskandarieh, Sahraian, Khosravian, Abolhasani, Razeghi Jahromi and Naser Moghadasi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Soodeh Razeghi Jahromi, c29vZGVocmF6ZWdoaUBnbWFpbC5jb20=; Abdorreza Naser Moghadasi, YWJkb3JyZXphbW9naGFkYXNpQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==,

These authors have contributed equally to this work

‡ORCID: Soodeh Razeghi Jahromi, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6696-6583
Abdorreza Naser Moghadasi, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8598-0911

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.