Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 24 January 2023
Sec. Neuro-Ophthalmology

Optic nerve sheath fenestration for visual impairment in cerebral venous diseases

\nXiao XueXiao Xue1Chen Zhou,Chen Zhou2,3Yuan GaoYuan Gao4Xunming Ji,Xunming Ji3,5Xuxiang Zhang
Xuxiang Zhang6*
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 2Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 3Laboratory of Brain Disorders, Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 4Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
  • 5Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 6Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

Objective: Visual impairment is the most common clinical feature of cerebral venous sinus occlusion or cerebral venous thrombosis-induced intracranial hypertension, which can result in optic atrophy, leading to irreversible vision loss, visual field defections, and finally, permanent blindness. Papilledema is a typical early pathophysiological alteration in visual impairment. Optic nerve sheath fenestration (ONSF) has become increasingly accepted as an option to prevent or halt progressive visual loss owing to its low risk and complications. The objective of this study is to review the latest research progress on ONSF for the treatment of visual impairment related to cerebral venous diseases.

Methods: Study were searched following PRISMA guidelines based on three electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase and Medline-Ovid). We used the following keywords and variations as keywords to identify studies: “optic nerve sheath fenestration, papilledema, cerebral venous diseases, cerebral venous stenosis, cerebral venous thrombosis, idiopathic intracranial hypertension”. The publication date of studies was restricted between 1,872.1.1 and 2,021.12.31. The application of ONSF in papilledema due to cerebral venous diseases is reviewed. Additionally, the common surgical approaches as well as advantages and disadvantages are also described graphically.

Results: With the improvement of specific details of the ONSF procedure and surgical instruments, complications of ONSF have reduced and its safety has been significantly improved, although the number of clinically investigated cases in the literature remains low.

Conclusion: We recommend that ONSF should be considered as an imperative alternative to reduce or delay the visual morbidity of cerebral venous diseases, although there is yet no consensus on the optimal surgical timing.

1. Introduction

The cerebral venous circulation consists of a superficial venous system and a deep venous system, both of which eventually drain into the right atrium via the internal jugular vein and the sigmoid sinus. Proper functioning of the brain relies on coordination of the functions of the arterial and cerebral venous systems. A disturbance in the cerebral venous return can lead to a wide range of neuropathological insults, including cranial hypertension, blood-brain barrier breakdown, abnormal cerebrospinal fluid circulation, impaired glymphatic system function, and hemodynamic disturbances. Causes of cerebral venous reflux disorders can be classified as thrombotic and non-thrombotic: thrombotic disorders include cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), whereas non-thrombotic disorders include cerebral venous sinus stenosis (CVSS).

2. Cerebral venous thrombosis

CVT is a specific type of cerebrovascular disease characterized by disturbed cerebral venous return and cranial hypertension, which presents clinically as headache, visual impairment, seizures, and focal neurological dysfunction (1, 2). CVT most often occurs in young women aged 25–35 years, accounting for ~ 0.5% of all deaths. CVT-related deaths include dural sinus thrombosis and cortical venous thrombosis, in which dural sinus thrombosis accounts for the majority. Venous thrombosis often originates from sinus thrombosis; venous thrombosis alone is rare. Various genetic or secondary thrombogenic factors can be the etiology of cerebral venous stenosis, including Factor V Leiden mutation; thrombin G20210A mutation; hyperhomocysteinemia; protein S, protein C, or antithrombin III defect; pregnancy; puerperium; oral contraceptives; obesity; blood disease; infection; trauma; tumor; dehydration; connective tissue disease; nephrotic syndrome; neurosurgery; and COVID-19 related etiology (28).

The clinical manifestations of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) are complex and heterogeneous. Blockage of the venous sinus by thrombotic tissue leads to an increase in pressure and venous dilatation in the distal sinus and at the same time, a decrease in cerebral perfusion pressure. These pathological changes can lead to insufficient local perfusion of brain tissue, tissue hypoxia, and reduced cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) absorption, and finally, venous infarction and high intracranial pressure (9, 10). In addition, thrombosis can damage the vascular wall, leading to blood-brain-barrier destruction, vascular rupture, and even subarachnoid hemorrhage. These pathological changes can cause headache, visual impairment, focal nerve injury, seizures, high intracranial pressure, and other symptoms or signs. The VENOST study (11) reported the clinical characteristics of 1,144 CVST patients, of which, 47% were acute onset, 34% were subacute onset, and 19% were chronic onset. The clinical symptoms were headache (87%), nausea and vomiting (28%), visual field defects (27%), seizures (24%), other focal neurological deficits (18%), and consciousness disturbance (18%). In the ISCVST study, papilledema was present in the acute phase in 30% of patients, and 6.7% had a major problem with visual impairment during their visit (12). In the VENOPORT study, 13% of the patients had impaired vision and 1.4% had severe visual loss (13). Moreover, 27% of CVST patients in the ENOST study had blurry vision (14).

3. Cerebral venous sinus stenosis

Cerebral venous stenosis is a cerebrovascular disease characterized by disturbed cerebral venous flow return. Based on the location of the lesion, it can be divided into cerebral venous sinus stenosis (CVSS) and internal jugular vein stenosis (IJVS). The mechanism of the generation of CVSS is as follows: (1) Endotype: malformation of the venous sinus wall (arachnoid granulation, scar tissue). The emergence of anatomical variations of the venous sinus wall (venous partition and blind pouch structures), result in a decline in venous compliance and capacity. Stagnation of blood flow or an excessively fast flow rate can thus be produced, eventually leading to an increase in the intravenous pressure and subsequently to an increase in intracranial pressure; (2) Exogenous: is mostly found in patients with self-limited venous sinus collapse caused by increased CSF pressure and extrusion of the intracranial space; however, the etiology remains unknown (15).

Obstruction of venous return by venous sinus stenosis causes increased venous sinus pressure distal to the stenosis, which in turn results in malabsorption of the CSF and increased intracranial pressure. Magnetic resonance imaging identified venous sinus stenosis is up to 93% of patients with idiopathic cranial hypertension (IIH) (14). However, it is worth noting that some patients who have a long-standing variant of venous sinus stenosis may not have an obvious clinical manifestation. Significant intracranial pressure elevations must develop after a “second hit”, which is mostly occurs in cases that are overweight or have CSF hypersecretion (16). Not only is intracranial venous sinus stenosis etiologically complex, but its causal relationship with raised intracranial pressure remains ambiguous. Usually, however, the clinical manifestations of intracranial venous sinus stenosis are associated with increased intracranial pressure, such as headache, pulsatile tinnitus, and decreased visual acuity. As intracranial pressure decreases, patient headache and tinnitus symptoms can improve, but massive retinal apoptosis can lead to irreversible vision loss and even blindness due to prolonged edema of the retinal cells (17).

4. Major mechanisms by which cerebral venous diseases lead to impairment of visual function

Regarding the causes of visual impairment in CVT patients, the site of embolization was divided into two types: (1) Focal brain injury due to cortical vein thrombosis: focal cerebral edema (including vasogenic edema and cytotoxic edema), cerebral infarction, and intracerebral hemorrhage, which occurs in the visual center of the occipital cortex and will cause visual field defects; (2) Intracranial hypertension due to dural sinus thrombosis: Normally, the CSF drains through the arachnoid granulation located in the sagittal and transverse sinuses; however, dural sinus thrombosis can disrupt this buffering mechanism, resulting in increased venous pressure, decreased CSF absorption, and increased intracranial pressure. The patient's excessive intracranial pressure can involve the third, IV, and VI cranial nerves to cause diplopia and also directly causes optic nerve damage (2).

The mechanism by which CVSS causes visual impairment is mainly through optic nerve damage due to increased intracranial pressure. The pathogenesis of optic disc edema in raised intracranial pressure is a mechanical phenomenon. It is primarily due to a rise of raised cerebrospinal fluid pressure in the optic nerve sheath, which produces axoplasmic flow stasis in the optic nerve fibers in the surface nerve fiber layer and prelaminar region of the optic nerve head. Axoplasmic flow stasis then results in swelling of the nerve fibers, and consequently of the optic disc. Swelling of the nerve fibers and of the optic disc secondarily compresses the fine, low-pressure venules in that region, resulting in venous stasis and fluid leakage; that leads to the accumulation of extracellular fluid. Thus, optic disc edema in raised cerebrospinal fluid pressure is due to a combination of swollen nerve fibers and the accumulation of extracellular fluid (18). Visual function impairment often presents as transient blurring of visual objects, enlargement of physiological blind spots, visual field defects, and irreversible vision loss (18).

5. Treatments of visual impairment caused by intracranial hypertension

Apart from using systemic anticoagulants to attempt recanalization and drugs with carbonic anhydrase inhibitor activity to reduce the ICPs, surgical treatment for cerebral venous disease, including CVST and CVSS, also include (1) recanalization by local thrombolysis, stenting, or mechanical devices; (2) cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures such as ventriculoperiotoneal shunting; and (3) specific treatment for conditions such as dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF) occurring as a late complication (1921). However, for visual impairment due to intracranial hypertension caused by CVT/CVSS, these methods do not provide rapid relief of optic nerve damage.

Patients with ocular symptoms and signs despite maximally tolerated medical treatment, ONSF is an effective and safe surgical option for the treatment of papilledema due to CVT/CVSS after medical treatment has failed (22). ONSF is a procedure that incises the optic nerve sheath in the intraorbital segment, thereby draining CSF into the orbital tissue to reduce intracranial pressure. The mechanism of ONSF is to provide a stoma to drain CSF or a fenestration to form a cyst to reduce pressure around the optic nerve (22). At present, the mechanism underlying the long-term onset of action is controversial and may be related to the closure of fistulas by fibroblasts in the subarachnoid space from the optic nerve sheath, scar formation, and a reduction in the distant conduction pressure (23). ONSF does not treat the source of the elevated ICP itself, but the procedure does diminish the associated visual sequelae (24).

Except for cerebral venous diseases, ONSF is widely applicated in papilledema due to IIH, cryptococcal meningitis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, intracranial mass or tumors, shunt malfunction (2527). Although studies have reported that unilateral ONSF significantly decreases the grade of papilledema in both ipsilateral (operated) and contralateral (unoperated) eyes (28, 29), whether or not to operate on both eyes depends on the doctor and patient's condition. In addition, study suggests that secondary and tertiary ONSF is a viable management option for patients with progressive vision loss from IIH (30).

At present, there is no consensus on the timing of ONSF surgery. However, strict follow-up and timely ONSF are important to prevent irreversible visual impairment.

Figure 1 provides a schematic diagram for the proposed management algorithm of new cases of CVT/CVSS.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Schematic diagram for the proposed management algorithm of visual impairment caused by intracranial hypertension due to CVT/CVSS. CVT, cerebral venous thrombosis; CVSS, cerebral venous sinus stenosis; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MRV, magnetic resonance venography; CT, computed tomography; CTA, computed tomographic angiography; ONSF, optic nerve sheath fenestration; OCT, optical coherence tomography; DAVF, dural arteriovenous fistula; EVT, endovascular therapy; ICP, intracranial pressure.

6. History of ONSF treatment for intracranial hypertension secondary to cerebral venous diseases

ONSF was first reported and proposed by De Wecker in 1872 adapted in neuroretinitis. In 1964, Hayreh et al. successfully made an animal model of intracranial hypertension, implemented ONSF in this animal model and eliminated papilledema after surgery. In 1988, Brourman et al. believed that ONSF was the preferred surgical method to maintain or improve visual function in patients with IIH. In 1991, Sergott et al. first applied ONSF to the treatment of CVST and concluded that the prognosis was closely related to the intervention time. In 2005, Cunha et al. reported a case of chronic intracranial hypertension secondary to multiple cerebral venous thrombosis, after ONSF treatment, papilledema eliminated, but visual acuity continued to deteriorate. In the following years, several authors such as Nithyanandam, Murdock, and Moreau successively published original articles on the application of ONSF for cerebral venous diseases. And the development of history of ONSF as a treatment for intracranial hypertension is presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. History of development of ONSF for intracranial hypertension.

7. Surgical approaches for ONSF

There are many surgical routes for ONSF, including the transconjunctival approach, transcranial route, and transnasal approach. According to a 2015 survey of ophthalmologists who performed ONSF (41), the three most commonly used surgical approaches were the medial conjunctival approach (59%), upper medial eyelid fold incision (31%), and lateral orbital incision (10%).

7.1. The medial conjunctival approach

The physician makes an incision on the bulbar conjunctiva along the nasal limbus of the affected eye, bluntly separates the bulbar conjunctiva and fascial tissue, and exposes and separates the medial rectus muscle. The physician makes a traction suture and pulls the eyeball against the temporal side, deflects, pushes the periocular and retro-orbital fat against the nasal side, and fully exposes the optic nerve sheath and posterior ciliary vessels and nerves. Finally, the optic nerve sheath is incised to drain the CSF, the rectus muscle is repositioned, and the conjunctiva is sutured (Figure 2). Through the medial conjunctival approach, the ONSF surgical approach is less surgically invasive than other approaches, leaving no scar after surgery and shorter recovery time. However, because of the damage to the medial rectus muscle and ciliary ganglion as well as blood vessels, it has the potential to cause postoperative short-term diplopia, pupillary paralysis, elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), and retinal artery occlusion (42).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The medial conjunctival approach: (a) Incise the bulbar conjunctiva along the nasal limbus, bluntly separate the bulbar conjunctiva and fascial tissue; (b) expose and separate the medial rectus muscle; (c) immobilize the internal rectus muscle; (d) expose the optic nerve sheath and make an incision.

7.2. Transepithelial medial eyelid approach

The physician makes an incision in the skin and orbicularis oculi muscle along the medial upper palpebral fold, uses sutures to secure the margins, bluntly separates the medial fat in the upper eyelid, exposes the optic nerve sheath, and incises and drains the CSF (Figure 3). The transepithelial medial eyelid approach saves time and does not result in injury to the extraocular muscles, far from the ciliary ganglion, reducing the probability of diplopia and pupillary paralysis complications; however, its disadvantage is the small surgical field and that there may be scar postoperatively (43).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Transepithelial medial eyelid approach: (a) Incise the skin; (b) incise orbicularis oculi muscle; (c) bluntly separate the medial fat in the upper eyelid; (d) expose the optic nerve sheath; (e, f) incise and drain.

7.3. Transcanthal incision approach

The physician creates a 1-cm lateral canthal incision, uses sutures to secure the lateral rectus muscle by traction under the lateral rectus muscle, and separates the overlying periosteum superiorly and inferiorly at the lateral margin. During the operation, the physician aims to expose the patient's near orbital rim eyeball, lift the deep lacrimal gland, expose the optic nerve sheath, and make an incision (Figure 4). Using this technique, a large enough surgical field can be obtained and the success rate of safe surgical manipulation of the optic nerve is guaranteed. At the same time, physicians there is no damage to the extraocular muscles, reducing the probability of diplopia; however, there are risks of damage to the lacrimal and ciliary ganglion causing lacrimal gland dysfunction and pupillary paralysis to a certain extent (44).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Transcanthal incision approach: (a) Incise a 1 cm lateral canthal incision; (b) use sutures to secure the lateral rectus muscle; (c) separate the overlying periosteum superiorly and inferiorly; (d) expose the eyeball, lift the deep lacrimal gland; (e) expose the optic nerve sheath and make an incision.

7.4. Nasoendoscopic transsphenoidal route

The physician uses nasendoscopy to pass through the nostril, resect part of the middle turbinate of the patient, expose the uncinate process and ethmoid bullae of the patients' maxillary sinus, and incise the lower 1/3 of the maxillary sinus to expose and enlarge the maxillary sinus to prevent mucous cyst formation. Then, the physician resects the ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses, revealing the patients' sphenoid plateau and sellar base, identifies the optic nerve carotid crypts as well as the optic nerve bulging, and then chisels the medial and superior wall of optic nerve canal and makes an incision from medial to lateral (Figure 5). The advantage of this procedure is the short operation time, which allows simultaneous bilateral optic nerve canal decompression. The disadvantage is the risk of complications such as CSF leakage, infection, and epistaxis (45).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Nasoendoscopic transsphenoidal route: (a) Use nasendoscopy to pass through the nostril, resects part of the middle turbinatet, exposes the uncinate process and ethmoid bullae of maxillary sinus, and incises the lower 1/3 of the maxillary sinus to expose the maxillary sinus. (b) Resect the ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses, reveal the sphenoid plateau and sellar base, identify the optic nerve carotid crypts as well as the optic nerve bulging. (c) Chisel the medial and superior wall of optic nerve canal and make an incision from medial to lateral.

7.5. Transcranial route

The physician adopts a frontotemporal pterygium craniotomy via Dolenc. The patient takes the supine position, and the head is rotated to the contralateral side by 30 degrees and is fixed using a head frame so that the supraorbital rim and zygomatic arch junction are at the highest point. The physician cuts the patients' scalp and temporalis muscle hierarchically, generating a free bone flap. The physician resects the sphenoid crest and part of the orbital roof of the patient under the microscope, cuts the dural sheath transversely through the supraorbital fissure, and uses an ultrasonic aspirator to separate the two-layered dural gaps in the lateral wall of the patient's cavernous sinus. The physician grinds off the patients' anterior bed process and continues with the abrasive decompression along the optic column to the sphenoid bone to decompress the patients' optic nerve at 270 degrees from superior, medial, and inferolateral. The physician then incises the patients' optic nerve sheath, which, together with the drilled bone, forms a channel for CSF outflow, and the fistula in this way communicates with the overlying muscles and the frontal and temporal lobes for systemic absorption (Figure 6). The advantage of such manipulation is that it is performed transorally without the risk of damaging the patients'vessels, resulting in a low incidence of diplopia. The disadvantages are the risk of infection and subdural cyst (46, 47).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Transcranial route: (A) Make a frontotemporal pterygium craniotomy via Dolenc route. (B) cut the scalp and temporalis muscle. (C) Grind off the anterior bed and the sphenoid bone and decompress the optic nerve at 270 degrees from superior, medial, and inferolateral.

7.6. Superonasal transconjunctival

Melson et al. (48) use an incision made through the conjunctiva in the superonasal fornix, excise a small strip of the underlying Tenon capsule, secure the superior and medial rectus muscles with separate 4-0 silk traction suture, insert The Farris-Tang retractor through the conjunctival incision to retract the surrounding structures nasally, expose the optic nerve sheath and create a fenestration along the superonasal aspect of the optic nerve sheath with intraocular scissors. The advantage of this procedure is the lack of muscle disinsertion which reduces postoperative diplopia rates as well as increases the efficiency and shortens operative time. Any intraoperative or perioperative complications have not be identified.

7.7. Emerging technologies

Kozub et al. (49) discovered that doctors could expose the optic nerve through an endoscope and then use infrared lasers for sheath cautery. Mitros et al. (50) developed a three-arm robot called the Concentric Tube Robot (CTR). The robot is equipped with a video camera, drilling needle, and micro holder, which can be self-regulated according to the curvature of the patient's ocular surface, entering from the front of the patient's eye, reaching the orbit and optic nerve, and completes a precise sheath incision operation.

8. Prognostic assessment for the ONSF treatment of papilledema

Previous studies have suggested that various surgical approaches and ways of cutting the optic nerve sheath (remove a window or fenestrate with slits) can achieve the purpose of decompression of the optic nerve sheath, with few complications (41, 43, 44, 5156). The rare complications of ONSF surgery include transient vision loss, choroidal infarction, transient third and sixth nerve paresis (5759). Regarding the evaluation of whether the procedure is effective, the current mainstay is clarification by comparing retinal nerve fiber layer thickness with optical coherence tomography, b-super-sheath diameter, optometry for best-corrected visual acuity, and Humphery perimetry (60, 61). Factors that may affect the surgical outcomes include inadequate exposure to the optic nerve, insufficient depth of optic nerve sheath incision, poor postoperative fibroblast proliferation or premature excessive proliferation of scar tissue, and, most importantly, the timing of the surgery for ONSF. Obi et al. (62) suggested that ONSF should be implemented aggressively and early to avoid a progressive decline in visual function in patients with IIH. Robinson et al. (63) suggested that for IIH patients with intracranial pressure higher than 50 cmH2O, the postoperative visual function improvements such as visual acuity and visual field were largely inferior to those with intracranial pressure lower than 50 cmH2O, and that the probability of poor visual outcome was also higher.

9. Prospects

With the improvement of specific details of the ONSF procedure and surgical instruments, complications of ONSF have reduced and its safety has been significantly improved. Although the number of clinically investigated cases in the literature remains low and there is a lack of controlled studies, the available studies are sufficient to suggest that ONSF can be used to prevent, or even reverse, visual impairment in patients with cerebral venous diseases, especially in patients who fail to respond to other treatments and still have progressive visual loss. Operation time is essential to save the patient's visual function; the earlier the operation time, the less damaged the optic nerve, and the greater the likelihood of recovery of visual function. Therefore, scholars are actively studying the optimal surgical timing of patients. In addition, it is necessary to develop a screening model for the patient's suitability for surgery. Furthermore, while pursuing improvements in visual function, we should actively search for a cause, cooperate with other regimens, and allow patients to receive timely and appropriately effective treatment.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding

This study was supported by the General Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82071312) and the Pharmaceutical Collaboration Project of Beijing Science and Technology Commission (Z181100001918026).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

CVT, cerebral venous thrombosis; CVST, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis; CVSS, cerebral venous sinus stenosis; IIH, Idiopathic Intracranial hypertension; ONSF, optic nerve sheath fenestration; IOP, elevated intraocular pressure; DAVF, dural arteriovenous fistula; EVT, endovascular therapy.

References

1. Ferro JM, Aguiar de Sousa D. Cerebral venous thrombosis. Nat Rev Neurol. (2017) 13:555–65. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ropper AH, Klein JP. Cerebral venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med. (2021) 385:59–64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2106545

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ferro JM, Canhão P, Stam J, Bousser M-G, Barinagarrementeria F, ISCVT Investigators. Prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis: results of the International Study on Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT). Stroke. (2004) 35:664–70. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000117571.76197.26

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Baldini T, Asioli GM, Romoli M, Dias MC, Schulte EC, Hauer L, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol. (2021) 28:3478–90. doi: 10.1111/ene.14727

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Dakay K, Cooper J, Bloomfield J, Overby P, Mayer SA, Nuoman R, et al. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in COVID-19 infection: a case series and review of the literature. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2021) 30:105434. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105434

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Abdalkader M, Shaikh SP, Siegler JE, Cervantes-Arslanian AM, Tiu C, Radu RA, et al. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in COVID-19 patients: a multicenter study and review of literature. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2021) 30:105733. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105733

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Sweid A, Hammoud B, Bekelis K, Missios S, Tjoumakaris SI, Gooch MR, et al. Cerebral ischemic and hemorrhagic complications of coronavirus disease 2019. Int J Stroke. (2020) 15:733–42. doi: 10.1177/1747493020937189

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Song S-Y, Lan D, Wu X-Q, Ding Y-C, Ji X-M, Meng R. Clinical characteristics, inflammation and coagulation status in patients with immunological disease-related chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency. Ann Transl Med. (2021) 9:236. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4201

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Jellinger KA. Handbook of cerebral venous thrombosis. Eur J Neurol. (2009) 16:e6–e38. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02469.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Schaller B, Graf R. Cerebral venous infarction: the pathophysiological concept. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2004) 18:179–88. doi: 10.1159/000079939

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Duman T, Uluduz D, Midi I, Bektas H, Kablan Y, Goksel BK, et al. A multicenter study of 1144 patients with cerebral venous thrombosis: The VENOST Study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2017) 26:1848–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.04.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ferro JM, Lopes MG, Rosas MJ, Ferro MA, Fontes J. Long-term prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis results of the VENOPORT study. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2002) 13:272–8. doi: 10.1159/000057855

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. King JO, Mitchell PJ, Thomson KR, Tress BM. Cerebral venography and manometry in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology. (1995) 45:2224–8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.45.12.2224

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Farb RI, Vanek I, Scott JN, Mikulis DJ, Willinsky RA, Tomlinson G, et al. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the prevalence and morphology of sinovenous stenosis. Neurology. (2003) 60:1418–24. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000066683.34093.E2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Dinkin MJ, Patsalides A. Venous sinus stenting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: results of a prospective trial. J Neuroophthalmol. (2017) 37:113–21. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Dinkin MJ, Patsalides A. Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: where are we now? Neurol Clin. (2017) 35:59–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2016.08.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Dinkin M, Oliveira C. Men are from mars, idiopathic intracranial hypertension is from venous: the role of venous sinus stenosis and stenting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Semin Neurol. (2019) 39:692–703. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3399506

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Hayreh SS. Pathogenesis of optic disc edema in raised intracranial pressure. Prog Retin Eye Res. (2016) 50:108–44. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Kalyvas A, Neromyliotis E, Koutsarnakis C, Komaitis S, Drosos E, Skandalakis GP, et al. A systematic review of surgical treatments of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Neurosurg Rev. (2021) 44:773–92. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01288-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Aaron S, Arthur A, Prabakhar AT, Mannam P, Shyamkumar NK, Mani S, et al. Spectrum of visual impairment in cerebral venous thrombosis: importance of tailoring therapies based on pathophysiology. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. (2017) 20:294–301. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_11_17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Havali C, Ince H, Gündogdu EB, Gürkaş E, Karal Y, Ekici A, et al. The management of elevated intracranial pressure and sinus vein thrombosis associated with mastoiditis: the experience of eighteen patients. Childs Nerv Syst. (2021) 38:421–8. doi: 10.1007/s00381-021-05402-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Murdock J, Tzu JH, Schatz NJ, Lee WW. Optic nerve sheath fenestration for the treatment of papilledema secondary to cerebral venous thrombosis. J Neuroophthalmol. (2014) 34:67–9. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000087

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Lee AG, Wall M. Papilledema: are we any nearer to a consensus on pathogenesis and treatment? Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. (2012) 12:334–9. doi: 10.1007/s11910-012-0257-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Adesina O, Patel Bc. Optic Nerve Decompression. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls (2021).

Google Scholar

25. Chen H, Zhang Q, Tan S, Fu H, Farris BK, Yang Z. Update on the application of optic nerve sheath fenestration. Restor Neurol Neurosci. (2017) 35:275–86. doi: 10.3233/RNN-160693

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Thomas S, Tan J, Lawden M, Sampath R. Optic nerve sheath fenestration for intracranial hypertension associated with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. (2004) 20:325–7. doi: 10.1097/01.IOP.0000131730.26396.84

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Proctor CNR, Baker RS, Pittman T. Prevention of visual loss caused by shunt failure: a potential role for optic nerve sheath fenestration Report of three cases. J Neurosurg. (2006) 104:149–51. doi: 10.3171/ped.2006.104.2.13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Alsuhaibani AH, Carter KD, Nerad JA, Lee AG. Effect of optic nerve sheath fenestration on papilledema of the operated and the contralateral nonoperated eyes in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Ophthalmology. (2011) 118:412–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Hagen SM, Wegener M, Toft PB, Fugleholm K, Jensen RH, Hamann S. Unilateral optic nerve sheath fenestration in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a 6-month follow-up study on visual outcome and prognostic markers. Life (Basel). (2021) 11:778. doi: 10.3390/life11080778

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Anzeljc AJ, Frias P, Hayek BR, Canter Weiner N, Wojno TH, Kim HJ. A 15-year review of secondary and tertiary optic nerve sheath fenestration for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Orbit. (2018) 37:266–72. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2017.1423337

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Moreau A, Lao KC, Farris BK. Optic nerve sheath decompression: a surgical technique with minimal operative complications. J Neuroophthalmol. (2014) 34:34–8. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Hayreh SS. Pathogenesis of oedema of the optic disc. Doc Ophthalmol. (1968) 24:289–411. doi: 10.1007/BF02550944

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Brourman ND, Spoor TC, Ramocki JM. Optic nerve sheath decompression for pseudotumor cerebri. Arch Ophthalmol. (1988) 106:1378–83. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060140542020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Sergott RC. Optic nerve sheath decompression: neuropathologic, clinical, and hemodynamic results and rationale. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. (1991) 89:675–720.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

35. Acheson JF, Green WT, Sanders MD. Optic nerve sheath decompression for the treatment of visual failure in chronic raised intracranial pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (1994) 57:1426–9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.11.1426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Banta JT, Farris BK. Pseudotumor cerebri and optic nerve sheath decompression. Ophthalmology. (2000) 107:1907–12. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00340-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Cunha LP, Gonçalves AC, Moura FC, Monteiro ML. Severe bilateral visual loss as the presenting sign of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: case report. Arq Bras Oftalmol. (2005) 68:533–7. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27492005000400020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Nithyanandam S, Manayath GJ, Battu RR. Optic nerve sheath decompression for visual loss in intracranial hypertension: report from a tertiary care center in South India. Indian J Ophthalmol. (2008) 56:115–20. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.39115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Elnahry AG, Talbet JH, Mahgoub IRE, Elnahry GA. Optic nerve sheath fenestration for papilledema due to cerebral venous sinus thrombosis associated with antiphospholipid syndrome: a case report. Am J Case Rep. (2021) 22:e930497. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.930497

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Bajin MS, Engin CD, Yaman A, Ayhan Z, Gökçay F, Çelebisoy N, et al. Optic nerve sheath decompression saves sight in severe papilloedema: results from 81 eyes in 56 patients with pseudotumor cerebri. Acta Ophthalmol. (2021) 99:e991–8. doi: 10.1111/aos.14732

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Sobel RK, Syed NA, Carter KD, Allen RC. Optic nerve sheath fenestration: current preferences in surgical approach and biopsy. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. (2015) 31:310–2. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000326

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Yaqub MA, Mehboob MA, Islam QU. Efficacy and safety of optic nerve sheath fenestration in patients with raised intracranial pressure. Pak J Med Sci. (2017) 33:471–5. doi: 10.12669/pjms.332.11937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Jefferis JM, Littlewood RA, Pepper IM, Hickman SJ, Salvi SM. Optic nerve sheath fenestration via a supero-medial eyelid skin crease approach for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in a UK population. Eye. (2021) 35:1418–26. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-1024-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Kersten RC, Kulwin DR. Optic nerve sheath fenestration through a lateral canthotomy incision. Arch Ophthalmol. (1993) 111:870–4. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090060160042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Srivastava AK, Singh S, Khatri D, Jaiswal AK, Sankar R, Paliwal VK, et al. Endoscopic endonasal optic nerve decompression with durotomy: pis aller in the mind of a blind. Neurol India. (2020) 68:54–60. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.279701

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Wadikhaye R, Alugolu R, Mudumba VS, A. 270-Degree decompression of optic nerve in refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension using an ultrasonic aspirator - a prospective institutional study. Neurol India. (2021) 69:49–55. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.310080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Dolenc VV. Frontotemporal epidural approach to trigeminal neurinomas. Acta Neurochir. (1994) 130:55–65. doi: 10.1007/BF01405503

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Melson AT, Warmath JD, Moreau A, Farris BK. Superonasal transconjunctival optic nerve sheath decompression: a simplified technique for safe and efficient decompression. J Neuroophthalmol. (2021) 41:e16–21. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000898

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Kozub J, Shen JH, Joos KM, Prasad R, Hutson MS. Optic nerve sheath fenestration using a Raman-shifted alexandrite laser. Lasers Surg Med. (2016) 48:270–80. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22456

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Mitros Z, Sadati S, Seneci C, Bloch E, Leibrandt K, Khadem M, et al. Optic nerve sheath fenestration with a multi-arm continuum robot. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. (2020) 5:4874–81. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2020.3005129

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Malik AI, Xu J, Lee AG. Outcomes of optic nerve sheath fenestration from superomedial eyelid crease approach. Orbit. (2022) 41:413–21. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2021.1880444

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Blessing NW, Tse DT. Optic nerve sheath fenestration: a revised lateral approach for nerve access. Orbit. (2019) 38:137–43. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2018.1452949

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Tirakotai W, Masaya-Anon P, Suwansanya J, Sitthimongkon U, Roongpuvapaht B. Endoscopic optic nerve sheath fenestration for treatment of papilledema secondary to intracranial venous hypertension: report of two cases. J Med Assoc Thai. (2016) 99(Suppl. 3):S141–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

54. Prabhakaran VC, Selva D. Vertical lid split approach for optic nerve sheath decompression. Indian J Ophthalmol. (2009) 57:305–6. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.53057

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Pelton RW. The anterior eyelid crease approach to the orbit. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. (2009) 20:401–5. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32832ec3f7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Pelton RW, Patel BC. Superomedial lid crease approach to the medial intraconal space: a new technique for access to the optic nerve and central space. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. (2001) 17:241–53. doi: 10.1097/00002341-200107000-00003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Othman BA, Raabe J, Malik A, Li H, Kini A, Lee AG. Transient vision loss after optic nerve sheath fenestration. Orbit. (2020) 39:217–20. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2019.1668433

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Rizzo JF 3rd, Lessell S. Choroidal infarction after optic nerve sheath fenestration. Ophthalmology. (1994) 101:1622–6. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31128-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Smith KH, Wilkinson JT, Brindley GO. Combined third and sixth nerve paresis following optic nerve sheath fenestration. J Clin Neuroophthalmol. (1992) 12:85–7; discussion 88. doi: 10.3109/01658109209058122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Gilbert AL, Chwalisz B, Mallery R. Complications of optic nerve sheath fenestration as a treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Semin Ophthalmol. (2018) 33:36–41. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2017.1353810

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Kabatas N, Eren Y, Nalcacioglu P, Caliskan S, Bicer T, Comoglu SS, et al. Management of the regression of papilledema with regional axon loss in idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients. Int Ophthalmol. (2021) 41:1467–77. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01711-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Obi EE, Lakhani BK, Burns J, Sampath R. Optic nerve sheath fenestration for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a seven year review of visual outcomes in a tertiary centre. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2015) 137:94–101. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.05.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Robinson ME, Moreau A, O'Meilia R, Pagteilan J, Ding K, Siatkowski RM, et al. The relationship between optic nerve sheath decompression failure and intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neuroophthalmol. (2016) 36:246–51. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000370

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: optic nerve sheath fenestration, papilledema, cerebral venous diseases, cerebral venous stenosis, cerebral venous thrombosis

Citation: Xue X, Zhou C, Gao Y, Ji X and Zhang X (2023) Optic nerve sheath fenestration for visual impairment in cerebral venous diseases. Front. Neurol. 14:1065315. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1065315

Received: 09 October 2022; Accepted: 06 January 2023;
Published: 24 January 2023.

Edited by:

Christoph Schankin, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland

Reviewed by:

Hilary Grabe, Inselspital, Switzerland
Ayman Gehad Elnahry, Cairo University, Egypt

Copyright © 2023 Xue, Zhou, Gao, Ji and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xuxiang Zhang, yes zhang_xuxiang@hotmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.