Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Neurol., 30 August 2022
Sec. Stroke

Research progress on astrocyte autophagy in ischemic stroke

\nPei-Wei SuPei-Wei Su1Zhe ZhaiZhe Zhai1Tong WangTong Wang2Ya-Nan Zhang,Ya-Nan Zhang1,3Yuan Wang,Yuan Wang1,3Ke Ma,Ke Ma1,3Bing-Bing Han,Bing-Bing Han1,3Zhi-Chun Wu,Zhi-Chun Wu1,3Hua-Yun Yu,Hua-Yun Yu1,3Hai-Jun Zhao,
Hai-Jun Zhao1,3*Shi-Jun Wang,
Shi-Jun Wang1,3*
  • 1College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
  • 2School of Nursing, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
  • 3Shandong Co-innovation Center of Classic Traditional Chinese Medicine Formula, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China

Ischemic stroke is a highly disabling and potentially fatal disease. After ischemic stroke, autophagy plays a key regulatory role as an intracellular catabolic pathway for misfolded proteins and damaged organelles. Mounting evidence indicates that astrocytes are strongly linked to the occurrence and development of cerebral ischemia. In recent years, great progress has been made in the investigation of astrocyte autophagy during ischemic stroke. This article summarizes the roles and potential mechanisms of astrocyte autophagy in ischemic stroke, briefly expounds on the crosstalk of astrocyte autophagy with pathological mechanisms and its potential protective effect on neurons, and reviews astrocytic autophagy-targeted therapeutic methods for cerebral ischemia. The broader aim of the report is to provide new perspectives and strategies for the treatment of cerebral ischemia and a reference for future research on cerebral ischemia.

Introduction

Stroke is an acute focal injury of the central nervous system initiated by vascular events. It is the main cause of disability, and the second most common cause of death worldwide (1, 2). Stroke is sub-divided into two types: hemorrhagic stroke and ischemic stroke. Ischemic stroke evoked by arterial occlusion accounts for 71% of all strokes (3). After ischemic stroke, astrocytes reportedly have a stronger ability to resist cerebral ischemic stress than neurons and play a significant neuroprotective role, holding promise as a key protector against ischemic damage (4). Notably, however, relevant pathophysiological mechanisms related to this have not been elucidated.

Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved intracellular lysosomal degradation pathway mediated by autophagy-related genes (ATGs) (5). Under physiological conditions, autophagy serves as an intracellular catabolism regulatory mechanism that prompts cells to adapt to metabolic demands and plays an important role in development, differentiation, maturation, immunity, and disease prevention (57). Under pathological conditions, autophagy interferes with cell homeostasis by maintaining the bioenergy of damaged cells, clears protein aggregates and damaged organelles, and participates in the pathophysiological processes of diseases such as malignant tumors and cardiovascular and nervous system disorders (8, 9).

Accumulating evidence indicates that astrocyte autophagy regulates the survival and death of neurons through a variety of pathways and factors in the context of cerebral ischemia, reducing or aggravating cerebral ischemic injury (1012). Therefore, astrocyte autophagy is likely to be a crucial therapeutic target in cerebral ischemia. Based on the understanding of the biological mechanism of autophagy, this report systematically expounds on the roles, molecular mechanisms, and effects of astrocyte autophagy in cerebral ischemia, and offers new ideas and strategies for the clinical treatment of cerebral ischemia.

Molecular mechanisms of autophagy

In mammals, autophagy exhibits three forms: chaperone-mediated autophagy, microautophagy, and macroautophagy (13). Relative to the aforementioned two processes, macroautophagy is the most widespread and classical form of autophagy (14) (hereinafter referred to as autophagy), in which proteins or organelles in the cytoplasm are wrapped by double-membrane autophagosomes and fused with lysosomes to form autophagolysosomes, the contents of which are then degraded (8). The process entails the initiation of autophagy, autophagosome formation, the formation of autophagolysosomes, and the degradation of their contents (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Molecular process of autophagy. Stresses stimulate mTORC1, initiating autophagy. Under the action of mTORC1 and AMPK, ULK1 in the ULK complex is activated, which in turn activates VPS34 in PtdIns3K-C1, generating PtdIns3P in the omegasome. ATG9A vesicles, recycling endosomes, and COPII-coated vesicles are involved in phagophore generation and nucleation. PtdIns3P recruits DFCP1 and WIPI2 for phagophore nucleation and expansion. The ATG12 system and the LC3 system regulate phagophore elongation, and the ESCRT mechanism regulates phagophore sealing, forming autophagosomes. Microtubule-based motor kinesins, FYCO1-RAB7 and BORC-ARL8 complexes, and dynein-dynein motor complex with RAB7, RILP, and ORP1L participate in the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes. SNARE complexes, tethers, and Rab proteins act synergistically in the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes to form autophagolysosomes.

Autophagy initiation

The initiation of autophagy is controlled and affected by a series of molecules. Intracellular autophagy is induced when the body suffers adverse events such as nutrient deficiency, hypoxia, oxidative stress, pathogen infection, or endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress (15). Initially, the nutrient sensor mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) and the energy sensor AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK) serve as upstream regulators of autophagy and modulate the critical autophagy-initiating kinase Unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase 1 (ULK1), inducing autophagy (1618). The protein kinase ULK complex is composed of ULK1/2, FIP200, ATG13, and ATG101 (19), and the autophagy-specific class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex I (PtdIns3K-C1) consisting of PIK3C3/vacuolar protein sorting 34 (VPS34), PIK3R4/VPS15, Beclin1, and ATG14L are then successively translocated and recruited to the phosphatidylinositol synthase (PIS)-rich ER subregion which consequently drives the autophagy cascade (2022).

Formation of autophagosomes

The formation of autophagosomes involves the processes of phagophore nucleation, elongation, and sealing. Phagophore is regenerated from small, flat cisterna and ATG9A vesicles, and recycling endosomes, COPII-coated vesicles, and the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) are potentially involved in phagophore generation and nucleation (23). Phagophore nucleation and growth can be regulated by the PtdIns3P-specific recruitment proteins zinc finger FYVE-type containing 1 (ZFYVE1/DFCP1) and WD repeat domain phosphoinositide-interacting protein 2 (WIPI2), but the regulatory mechanism of phagophore nucleation remains unclear (24, 25).

Phagophore elongation is modulated by two ubiquitin-like protein-binding systems, the ATG12 system and the microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) system (26, 27). ATG12 is activated by the E1-like enzyme ATG7, then forms a thioester intermediate with ATG7 and the E2-like enzyme ATG10, then ATG12 binds to ATG5 and forms the complex ATG12-ATG5-ATG16L1 with ATG16L1 dimer (2729). In the LC3 system, the protease ATG4 cleaves the C-terminus of LC3 to generate LC3-I, which binds to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and is converted to autophagosome membrane-bound LC3-II via the action of the E1-like enzyme ATG7, E2-like enzyme ATG3, and ATG12-ATG5-ATG16L1 resulting in adsorption (30, 31).

The process of phagophore sealing contributing to the formation of autophagosomes is directly regulated by the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery (3234). It has also been reported that the ATG-conjugated system, Rab guanosine triphosphatases, soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs), sphingomyelin, and calcium are involved in the process of phagophore sealing (35, 36).

Formation of autophagolysosomes

SNARE complexes, tethers, phosphoinositides, and Rab proteins collectively mediate the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes/endosomes (37, 38). The transport of autophagosomes and lysosomes via microtubules is crucial for their successful fusion (37). The homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting complex, a key tethering factor in the fusion process, interacts with guanosine triphosphatases and other proteins to promote cross-linking of autophagosome membranes and endosome/lysosome membranes (39). The SNARE complex, the most critical factor in the fusion process, drives the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes to form autophagolysosomes (40). Ultimately autophagolysosomes are degraded by lysosomes, and the contents are released into the cytoplasm generating energy and substances for cellular reorganization and homeostasis (41).

Ischemic stroke and autophagy

Acute ischemic occlusion and decreased cerebral arterial blood flow in ischemic stroke cause insufficient oxygen supply to the brain and reduced glucose. This results in severe stress responses and a series of metabolic disorder-induced pathological changes including energy exhaustion, increased calcium ion concentration, excitotoxicity, cytokine-mediated cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammation (42). These alterations trigger the autophagic process in ischemic stroke (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Autophagy pathways affected by pathological changes after cerebral ischemia. Hypoxic conditions activate HIF-1α which then binds to HIF-1β, and BNIP3 dissociates Beclin1 from the Beclin1/Bcl-2 complex, eliciting autophagy. p53 also induces autophagy. Growth factors that are deficient after cerebral ischemia activate PI3K, inducing Akt phosphorylation, then inhibit TSC1/2 and Rheb, activating mTORC1. Amino acid deficiency under cerebral ischemia induces autophagy by inhibiting mTORC1 activity. Similarly, energy exhaustion leads to increased AMP/ATP, and activation of AMPK inhibits the activity of mTORC1, mediating autophagy. Cerebral ischemia can trigger the release of Ca2+ from the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor on the ER, activating CaMKKβ, thereby activating AMPK. ER stress mediates autophagy mainly through the PERK-eIF2α-ATF4 pathway. Excessive misfolded proteins caused by ischemic injury promote autophagy by upregulating Bcl2-associated athanogene 3 and histone deacetylase 6.

Initially, hypoxia in brain tissues elicits enhanced activity of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which in turn regulates autophagy. B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl2)-interacting protein (BNIP3), the direct target gene of HIF-1α (the oxygen-regulated HIF-1 subunit), competes with Beclin1 to form the BNIP3/Bcl-2 complex and dissociates Beclin1, accelerating autophagy. Hypoxia-induced HIF-1α can stabilize p53, activating autophagy (4345). The deficiency of glucose and growth factors after ischemia then reduces the activity of the PI3K/Akt pathway, which in turn inhibits the activity of the nutrient sensor mTORC1 and induces the autophagy pathway (46, 47). Energy is exhausted in brain cells, and the AMP/ATP ratio is greatly increased, leading to AMPK activation. AMPK has a direct role in initiating the autophagy pathway and inhibits the activity of mTORC1, boosting the autophagy process (48, 49). Ca2+ can be released through the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor in the ER calcium channel under ischemic conditions, and this is closely linked to ER stress (50). Cerebral ischemic injury can trigger ER stress, activating unfolded protein response (UPR). UPR core component protein kinase R-like ER kinase (PERK)-induced upregulation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) activates the translation of transcription factor 4 (ATF4), indirectly participating in autophagy regulation (10, 51).

After cerebral ischemia, the ubiquitin-proteasome system can degrade the misfolded proteins induced by it. When the ubiquitin-proteasome system is overloaded, however, excess misfolded proteins induce autophagy by increasing the expression of Bcl2-associated athanogene 3 and histone deacetylase 6, by which the misfolded proteins are eliminated through the autophagy-lysosomal pathway (52, 53). Previous studies have mostly focused on the induction of autophagy in brain tissues, especially neurons, through pathological changes after cerebral ischemic injury. The important role, intervention factors, and specific regulatory mechanism of glial autophagy, as well as whether there are differences between neuronal autophagy and glial autophagy, need to be further studied.

Autophagy of astrocytes in ischemic stroke

Under physiological conditions, astrocytes in brain tissues exhibit a relatively high level of basal autophagy to maintain cellular homeostasis and function (11, 54). There are rarely autophagosomes in healthy neurons in brain tissue, indicating that neuronal basic autophagy is at a low level under normal physiological conditions (55). Knocking out core autophagy regulatory genes in neurons and astrocytes during the normal growth process of organisms leads to neurological degeneration and brain dysfunction (5658). Thus, basic autophagy is essential for the normal functioning of neurons and astrocytes.

Ischemia-hypoxia injury deregulates autophagy, and also promotes the transformation of basic autophagy in astrocytes and neurons into induced high-level autophagy (54, 59, 60). Another study revealed that astrocytes are more sensitive than neurons, with stronger autophagic responses under the stimulation of metabolic and ischemic solutions (61). Ischemic injury after ischemia/reperfusion significantly elevates the level of autophagic flux in astrocytes, and they retain more autophagic mechanistic function than neurons (11). It is therefore essential to ascertain the specific mechanism of autophagy in damaged astrocytes in ischemic stroke. Recent reports indicate that astrocyte autophagy may have a dual effect on ischemic stroke (Table 1) and it is regulated by multiple molecules and pathways.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Roles of astrocyte autophagy in experimental models of ischemic stroke.

Dual roles of astrocyte autophagy

Detrimental role

The activation and development of autophagy can cause and aggravate the ischemic injury of astrocytes. Qin et al. (62) reported that astrocyte autophagy is activated and cellular autophagic vacuoles are increased in the cortical core region of permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) induces autophagy of astrocytes, and markedly increases the expression of the early autophagy marker protein Beclin1 and the LC3-II/LC3-I ratio (62). The addition of the autophagy inhibitor 3-methyladenine (3-MA) and bafilomycin A1 (Baf-A1) mildly but significantly inhibits the death of damaged astrocytes (62). It has also been reported that the activation of autophagy results in ischemic damage to astrocytes (63). Under OGD conditions, ATG5 and LC3-II are downregulated in ATG5-knockout astrocytes, and 3-MA and the autophagy inhibitor wortmannin repress OGD-induced astrocyte autophagy and the activation of cysteinyl aspartate-specific protease 3 (caspase-3) but increase the number of active astrocytes (63). The circular RNA HECTD1 (circHECTD1) is significantly increased in ischemic brain tissues, and knockdown of circHECTD1 restrains astrocyte autophagy and ameliorates neuronal damage and brain edema (64). The presence of excess zinc ions after ischemic stroke markedly aggravates brain injury, and 3-MA suppresses the autophagy and death of astrocytes caused by hypoxia/reoxygenation in the presence of zinc ions in vitro (65).

Protective role

Autophagy reportedly has a protective effect on astrocytes after ischemia and hypoxia. Pamenter et al. (54) reported that Beclin1 and LC3-II in astrocytes were markedly increased during 2 to 6 h of oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD), and similar observations were reported by Qin et al. (62). Dissimilarly, 4 and 12 h of treatment of OGD-exposed astrocytes with 3-MA and the autophagy inhibitor chloroquine significantly reduced astrocyte viability, whereas Baf-A1 treatment had little effect (54). In another study, Beclin1 knockout reduced LC3-II levels, inhibited the degradation of p62 in OGD-treated astrocytes, and increased caspase-3 expression and the number of apoptotic cells (66). Intriguingly, caspase 3 cleavage levels are elevated and cell apoptosis is strengthened in astrocytes after 1 and 4 h of exposure to OGD and treatment with 3-MA, whereas astrocyte viability is reduced after 4, 8, and 24 h of exposure, and autophagy inhibits the astrocyte apoptosis elicited by OGD (67).

Multiple factors affect astrocyte autophagy. Most studies have investigated astrocyte autophagy in vitro, possibly due to the difficulty of quantitatively determining the amount of autophagy in astrocytes in vivo. Notably, the different roles of autophagy in the regulation of ischemic injury may be relevant to the discrepancies in the length of anaerobic time, presence/absence of reoxygenation, and length of reoxygenation time in reported studies, as well as differences in autophagy inhibitors and concentrations. Wang et al. (10) reported that moderate autophagy could maintain cellular homeostasis and that long-term excessive autophagy could lead to cell death due to excess cellular adaptive capacity. Therefore, astrocyte autophagy may be a “double-edged sword” in cerebral ischemia, due to different degrees of ischemic and hypoxic damage after cerebral ischemia, and varying durations of autophagy activation.

Astrocyte autophagy-regulatory pathways

mTOR

mTOR is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates intracellular transcription, translation, protein degradation, and metabolism (68). The mTOR inhibitor rapamycin attenuates astrocyte proliferation and production of inflammatory cytokines following OGD/reoxygenation (OGD/R) (69). Another study indicates that rapamycin elicits the autophagy of astrocytes after OGD/R (12). However, it has also been reported that OGD triggers astrocyte autophagic flux, accompanied by an increase in the level of phosphorylated (p)-mTOR, that is, mTOR can regulate astrocyte autophagy (70).

AMPK

AMPK is a serine/threonine kinase that is a key regulator of the intracellular energy metabolic balance (71) and can positively regulate autophagy in astrocytes. Liver kinase B1, AMPKα1, and acetyl-CoA carboxylase are phosphorylated and upregulated when autophagy is induced in ischemic astrocytes, whereas AMPKα1 silencing and its inhibitor can downregulate the expression of astrocyte autophagy protein (54). As described above, the upstream regulators of autophagy mTORC1 and AMPK regulate the initiation of autophagy by activating ULK1 (16, 17). Another study identified the involvement of the AMPK/mTOR/ULK1 pathway in astrocyte autophagy (72). Upon elevation of autophagy levels in astrocytes after OGD exposure, p-AMPK and p-ULK1 protein levels are markedly elevated and mTOR is dephosphorylated (72).

Non-coding RNA-mediated autophagy

Non-coding RNAs have emerged as mediators of the autophagy pathway (73). They do not encode proteins and include microRNAs (miRNAs) that control translational functions, circular RNAs (circRNAs) that mediate miRNA functions, and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) that regulate transcriptional functions (74). Upregulation or downregulation of miRNAs may induce autophagy under stress conditions (75). Zhao et al. (66) reported that miR-30d inhibited Beclin1 in astrocytes and that miR-30d antagomir expedited autophagy in OGD-treated astrocytes, which could be reversed by knocking out Beclin1 (66). CircHECTD1 is significantly elevated in brain tissues after cerebral ischemia and acts as a sponge of endogenous miR-142 to inhibit its activity, thereby upregulating the expression of TCDD inducible poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (TIPARP) and promoting autophagy (64). Conversely, circHECTD1 knockdown reverses this process and partially alleviates ischemic injury (64). circ_0025984 and ten-eleven translocation (TET) family protein 1 (TET1) are the sponge and target of miR-143-3p, respectively, and under OGD conditions, they are downregulated in astrocytes, whereas miR-143-3p is significantly upregulated. miR-143-3p inhibitor and circ_0025984 and TET1 overexpression can dramatically reduce astrocyte apoptosis and autophagy in mice with cerebral ischemia (76). To date, there are no reports on the regulation of lncRNAs and astrocyte autophagy in cerebral ischemia.

Post-translational modifications

Autophagy protein activity and autophagy development are widely regulated by post-translational modifications (PTMs). PTM is a biochemical process that regulates protein activity and function (77). PTMs are well-known for their roles in autophagy, and phosphorylation and ubiquitin are two common types (78). Other types of PTM regulations such as acetylation, O-glcnacylation, and N6-methyladenosine modification reportedly play key roles in autophagy (7982). Rahman (83) concluded that increasing O-glcnacylation did not affect astrocyte autophagy levels, and that inhibiting it promoted the autophagy of mouse cortical astrocytes. Hypoxia induces acetylation of p21 [RAC1] activated kinase 1 (PAK1), which promotes the phosphorylation and binding of ATG5 in threonine 101, thereby enhancing autophagy and promoting glioblastoma (84). Similarly, the autophagy-related gene ULK2 was found to be silenced via methylation in glioblastoma and plays an important role in astrocyte transformation in vitro via autophagy (85). Phosphorylation of astrocyte gap junction protein connexin-43 (Cx43) is the initiator of selective autophagic degradation of Cx43 during ischemic injury (86). Ubiquitination of Cx43 is involved in autophagic degradation, but the relationship between the two is currently unclear (86). Therefore, these types of PTMs play important roles in astrocyte autophagy, but the specific intervention modes and mechanisms involving PTMs and astrocyte autophagy after cerebral ischemia require further investigation.

Differences between astrocytes and neurons in the autophagy pathway

The autophagy process differs in astrocytes and neurons under stress. During nutritional deprivation and metabolic stress induced by the autophagy inducer rapamycin, astrocyte autophagy is more strongly activated than neuron autophagy (87). Similarly, Moruno-Manchon et al. (88) reported that the autophagy related to sphingospkinase 1 was enhanced in astrocytes under starvation conditions, whereas neurons were not affected, and that the autophagy inducer benoxazine upregulated neuronal autophagy and sphingospkinase 1, but astrocytes were not affected. Autophagy reactions between astrocytes and neurons differ under hypoxic-ischemic conditions, and studies indicate that there may be differences in the autophagy pathway between astrocytes and neurons in cerebral ischemia.

MTOR and AMPK are classic pathways that regulate autophagy in astrocytes and neurons after cerebral ischemic injury. Regulated in development and DNA damage responses 1, TP53-induced glycolysis and apoptosis regulator, P53, and lncRNA C2dat2 are upstream of mTOR and regulate the autophagy pathway of mTOR in neurons (8993). Similarly, Sirtuin3, LncR-AC136007.2, and α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7nAChR) can also affect the neuronal AMPK autophagy pathway (9496). However, it is not known whether these or other regulatory factors affect the autophagy pathway of astrocytes. The classical autophagy regulatory pathway PI3K/AKT/mTOR can regulate neuronal autophagy (47), but whether it regulates astrocyte autophagy in cerebral ischemia has not been determined. Beclin1, ATG7, and ATG16L are core autophagy regulatory factors, and miR-30a, β-arrestin 2, mir-379-5p, lncRNA snhg3, and lncRNA peg11as function as their upstream factors to regulate neuronal autophagy (97100). Others, including autophagy-influencing factors transcription factor EB, syntaxin 17, and myotubularin-related protein 14 play specific roles in the autophagy of cerebral ischemic neurons (101103). Interestingly, the downregulation of miR-30a in cerebral ischemic injury can enhance Beclin1-mediated neuronal autophagy to alleviate ischemic injury, and miR-30a also inhibits the expression of Beclin1 and autophagy in astrocytes. However, the effect of miR-30a on differences between astrocyte autophagy and neuron autophagy requires further investigation (66, 97, 98). HIF-1, UPR, neuron-specific protein conventional protein kinase Cγ (cPKCγ), and Shroom 4 are expressed in polarized cells such as neurons and can also regulate neuronal autophagy after cerebral ischemia (104107). Despite numerous studies investigating differences in autophagy pathways between neurons and astrocytes after cerebral ischemia, the classic astrocyte autophagy pathway and the upstream regulator of autophagy core protein remain unclear. Few studies have investigated the differential regulation of autophagy in neurons and astrocytes under the same conditions. Such investigations may guide future research in the field of astrocyte autophagy.

Crosstalk between astrocyte autophagy and other mechanisms in ischemic stroke

In the malignant secondary process of cerebral ischemic injury, astrocytes perform different functions at different stages, which are affected by many factors and mechanisms. Astrocytes activated by ischemic injury become reactive astrocytes, and under the influence of oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and other mechanisms caused by cerebral ischemic injury, they play a role in alleviating oxidative stress, releasing neurotrophic factors, producing excitatory toxicity, triggering inflammation, and glial scar formation (108). Astrocyte autophagy is one of the important regulatory mechanisms that plays an important role in the crosstalk between autophagy and other mechanisms.

Oxidative stress

Many studies indicate that there is a close relationship between oxidative stress and autophagy. Specific manifestations of oxidative stress include excessive production of free radicals and oxidants or insufficient endogenous antioxidant capacity, resulting in damage to DNA, lipids, proteins, and other cellular components (109). The excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) activates autophagy, resulting in the removal of irreversible oxidation molecules and the reduction of oxidative stress damage, whereas damaged or disordered autophagy leads to increased mitochondrial ROS under pathological conditions (25, 110). Astrocyte autophagy is activated in an H2O2 environment, and autophagy inhibitors can reduce H2O2-induced cell damage (111). Lead exposure induces autophagy and oxidative stress in astrocytes, and the use of autophagy inhibitors reduces oxidative stress levels (112). Hence, astrocyte autophagy may increase oxidative stress damage. After pretreatment with rapamycin and anthocyanin, autophagy levels and the viability of U87 cells were reportedly increased in an OGD environment, and anthocyanin had strong antioxidant activity and reduced cellular ROS levels (113). This suggests that induction of autophagy after cerebral ischemic injury may improve the capacity of astrocytes to resist oxidative stress (113). Whether astrocyte autophagy can exacerbate oxidative stress damage caused by cerebral ischemia is in urgent need of further research.

Inflammation

As an intracellular protein degradation system, autophagy is involved in the regulation of inflammation. It eliminates inflammasome and pro-inflammatory cytokines, thereby limiting harmful and uncontrolled inflammation, whereas autophagy deficiency promotes the abnormal activation of inflammasomes, leading to many inflammatory diseases (109, 114). Rapamycin, an autophagy inducer, reportedly promotes the production of the astrocyte inflammatory factors TNF-α and iNOS in an OGD/R environment (69). Zha et al. (12) found that rapamycin-induced astrocyte autophagy downregulated the expression of inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL) 1β and IL-6 in astrocytes under the influence of OGD/R, and the protective astrocyte autophagy induced may be offset by an inflammatory response with the prolongation of injury time. It can be inferred that the “struggle” between astrocyte autophagy and inflammatory responses also changes with the duration of ischemic injury, which further supports the contention that cerebral ischemia is affected by multiple complex mechanisms.

Apoptosis and necroptosis

Under physiological and pathological conditions, autophagy and apoptosis—as two distinct manifestations of programmed cell death—have important roles in maintaining homeostasis. Autophagy interacts with apoptosis through complex mechanistic networks such as the interaction between autophagy-related proteins and caspases (115), and interactions between autophagy-related proteins Beclin1, Bcl-2, and Bcl-xL (116). Dynamic changes in autophagy and apoptosis within 7 days after stroke were assessed by determining the levels of LC3-II and cleaved caspase-3 following permanent MCAO injury (117). Results included activation and coexistence of autophagy and apoptosis within 12 h, as well as a marked decrease in the caspase-3 cleavage level and an increase in the LC3-II level after 4 days, suggesting a possible transition from apoptosis to autophagy, but it is unclear whether this transition occurred in neurons or glial cells (117). Another study indicated that autophagy may delay the initiation of apoptosis via the endogenous apoptotic pathway and protects astrocytes against OGD (67). After exposure to OGD combined with 3-MA for 1 h and 4 h, the levels of caspase-3 cleavage and caspase-9 were elevated in the astrocytes, and apoptosis was accelerated compared to control astrocytes. After 8 and 24 h of exposure, the levels of these factors were lower than those in control astrocytes (67).

Some progress has been made concerning the mutual regulatory mechanism of autophagy and apoptosis in astrocytes post-cerebral ischemia. Zhou et al. (63) reported that activation of the autophagy pathway after permanent MCAO can activate cathepsins B and L, cleave Bid, and elicit the translocation of cytochrome c from mitochondria to the cytoplasm, thereby activating caspase-3 in the ischemic cortex (63). In vitro experiments indicate that inhibition of astrocyte autophagy can block this process, which may be related to the reduction of lysosomal membrane instability caused by upregulation of heat shock protein 70.1B in astrocyte lysosomes (63). Under ischemic conditions, genetic knockout of ATG7 reduces caspase-3 and caspase-9 levels in astrocytes, whereas overexpression of miR-143-mediated TET1 induces 150-kDa oxygen-regulated protein, which in turn increases ATG7 levels via upregulation of glucose-regulated protein 78 (76). This contributes to the autophagy activation and apoptosis driven by caspase-3 and caspase-9 upregulation (76). Autophagy of OGD-induced astrocytes is suppressed and their apoptosis is increased after Beclin1 knockout (66). However, Beclin1 does not have a direct pro-apoptotic capacity, and its BH3 domain binds to members of the Bcl-2 family, thus playing a key regulatory role in autophagy and apoptosis (118, 119). c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) can facilitate astrocyte apoptosis by increasing Bax/Bcl-2 levels after cerebral ischemic injury (120). Du et al. (121) reported that andrographolide accelerates autophagy and reduces the apoptosis of astrocytes after 12 h of hypoxia by activating the JNK pathway and regulating ATG5 in an in vitro astrocyte hypoxia injury model. Whether the JNK pathway affects the crosstalk between astrocyte autophagy and apoptosis in ischemic stroke warrants further investigation.

Astrocyte autophagy is closely associated with necroptosis. The regulatory or programmed form of necrosis is called necroptosis, of which receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK) is an important regulatory protein (122). Ryan et al. (123) investigated time-dependent changes in RIPK1, RIPK3, and apoptosis-related and autophagy-related proteins within 48 h after whole cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. They reported that ischemic injury may activate autophagy-triggered necroptosis, and described a contrasting effect with caspase-3-dependent apoptosis (123). Another study indicated that RIPK1-mediated necroptosis may activate the autophagy-lysosome pathway by elevating LC3-II and active cathepsin B levels, thereby leading to ischemia-caused astrocyte death (124). In conclusion, autophagy, apoptosis, and necroptosis are modes of programmed cell death, and the relationship among autophagy, apoptosis, and necroptosis is not difficult to demonstrate, but the relevant mechanism has not been explained. Ferroptosis, a newly described type of autophagy-dependent programmed cell death type, is inextricably linked to autophagy. Unfortunately, to date, there is no reported study on the relationship between the two in astrocytes, which may be a new field that remains to be explored.

Ubiquitin proteasome system

The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) is a non-lysosomal protein degradation system (125). It is capable of eliminating short-lived, damaged, and misfolded proteins (125). As a lysosomal protein degradation pathway, autophagy interacts with UPS (126). Inhibition of protease induces compensatory autophagy activation, and inhibition of autophagy promotes the accumulation of ubiquitinated substrates and their polymers (126). Previous studies confirmed that inhibition of proteasome upregulation of Beclin1 and LC3-I expression activated SHG-44 glioma cell autophagy (127). Further studies showed that when the proteasome is damaged, the astrocyte autophagy pathway is activated to resist proteasome stress damage (128). In a recent study, however, inhibition of UPS astrocyte autophagosomes increased slightly, accompanied by an increase in autophagy flux, and decreased with long-term inhibition of UPS astrocyte autophagy flux, which may be due to the inability of specific aggregates in astrocytes to degrade via the autophagy pathway (129). Notably, there is a shift from a UPS to an autophagy-mediated protein degradation pathway from ischemic injury to severe injury (52). Impaired UPS capacity in cerebral ischemia leads to the activation of compensatory astrocyte autophagy by massive fused in sarcoma (FUS) aggregate and may lead to excessive autophagy (130). Therefore, there are interactions and crosstalk between UPSs and autophagy in ischemic astrocytes, and how to use the mechanism and relationship to treat an ischemic injury is a new challenge.

Astrocyte autophagy and neurons in ischemic stroke

Under physiological and pathological conditions, astrocytes and neurons are inseparable in terms of structure and function with respect to maintaining the functional stability and health of the central nervous system. Astrocytes are structurally closely related to neurons, with their fine branch processes linked to all parts of neurons (131). In the context of cerebral ischemia, astrocytes can supply metabolic substrates such as glucose and lactate, and release neurotrophic factors to protect neurons and maintain neuronal activity (131133). Astrocytes can also secrete pro-inflammatory mediators that damage neurons (133). In an astrocyte-neuron co-culture model, OGD-induced autophagic flux in astrocytes enhances neuronal viability and attenuates apoptosis, whereas inhibition of autophagic flux counteracts this effect, which is consistent with in vivo experiments (11). Interestingly, the autophagy agonist rapamycin triggers autophagy in astrocytes after OGD/R, which can effectively reduce the release of IL-1β and IL-6 from astrocytes, contributing to a protective effect on neurons (12). G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) in astrocytes exerts a neuroprotective role in mouse MCAO, and activation of GPR30 restores astrocyte autophagy suppressed by glutamate and alleviates neuronal damage (134). In conclusion, astrocyte autophagy helps to protect neuronal activity after ischemia, and it plays a dual role after cerebral ischemic injury. Whether the injury of astrocyte autophagy affects neurons, and the specific mechanism of autophagy flux which plays a protective role in neurons, warrant further investigation.

Astrocyte autophagy-targeted drug therapies for ischemic stroke

Therapeutic drugs targeting astrocyte autophagy can exert neuroprotective effects through different actions and pathways in ischemic stroke (Table 2). Rapamycin is an autophagy agonist that inhibits mTOR, initiating autophagy. It can induce autophagy in astrocytes after OGD/R, alleviating damage and reducing the infarct size in rats with transient MCAO (12). Similarly, dexmedetomidine upregulates autophagy in astrocytes by activating the TSC2/mTOR pathway and has a protective effect against cerebral ischemia (70). Ginkgolide K, a bioactive lactone extracted from Ginkgo biloba leaves, stimulates protective autophagy in astrocytes after OGD via the AMPK/mTOR/ULK1 pathway (72), and the Salvia miltiorrhiz extract salvianolic acid B exhibits a consistent effect (135). In contrast, Dendrobium officinale polysaccharides block AMPK/ULK1 pathway activation and have anti-autophagic effects on hypoxia/reoxygenation-stimulated astrocytes, promoting cell survival and reducing apoptosis (136). circAkap7-modified adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell-sourced exosomes can target ATG12, facilitating astrocyte autophagy and ameliorating ischemic brain injury, and are thus of clinical therapeutic value (137). Other pharmacological studies suggest that both anthocyanins (113) and delta-opioid peptide [D-Ala2, D-leu5] enkephalin (138) confer protection against hypoxia-ischemia injury by inducing autophagy in astrocytes, whereas breviscapine (139), nimodipine (140), and propofol (141) have protective effects on hypoxia-ischemia injury via suppression of astrocyte autophagy. Many experimental studies have demonstrated that astrocyte autophagy is a potentially important therapeutic target in cerebral ischemia by utilizing the dual effects of astrocyte autophagy, but how to develop targeted drug therapy based on the characteristics of astrocyte autophagy requires further research.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Astrocyte autophagy-targeted drug therapies for ischemic stroke.

Conclusions and perspectives

As a regulatory mechanism to maintain the protein balance in the body, autophagy is indispensable. Astrocyte autophagy becomes a “double-edged sword” in ischemic stroke, and there are crosstalks between astrocyte autophagy and other pathological mechanisms. Notably, targeting autophagic flux in astrocytes can reinforce the neuroprotective effect of astrocytes. Therefore, it is particularly important to control the level of autophagy in astrocytes. Based on the existing literature, we have summarized the regulatory pathways involved in astrocyte autophagy in ischemic stroke, as depicted in Figure 3.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The regulatory pathways involved in astrocyte autophagy in ischemic stroke.

With continued research, astrocyte autophagy may become a therapeutic drug target in cerebral ischemia, but the clinical efficacy of this approach remains to be validated. Notably, autophagy-related genes may have various effects on cells. For example, the autophagy-associated protein Beclin1 affects the autophagy process, but it also participates in the regulation of cell functions such as endocytic transport and LC3-related phagocytosis (119). Thus, there is an urgent need to develop therapeutic drugs targeting the regulation of astrocyte autophagy in ischemic stroke, which is conducive to elucidating the regulatory mechanisms of astrocyte autophagy and provides new directions and strategies for the clinical treatment of cerebral ischemia.

Author contributions

P-WS: wrote the manuscript and draw the pictures. ZZ, TW, Y-NZ, YW, KM, B-BH, Z-CW, and H-YY: proofread the manuscript. H-JZ and S-JW: reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to this article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81874411), the Joint Foundation for Innovation and Development of the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021LZY014), the Shandong Province Universities' Development Plan for Youth Innovation Teams (2019-9-201, 2019-9-202, and 2019KJK013), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2019ZD23).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Feigin VL, Stark BA, Johnson CO, Roth GA, Bisignano C, Abady GG, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. (2021) 20:795–820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Campbell BCV, Khatri P. Stroke. Lancet. (2020) 396:129–42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31179-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Campbell BCV, De Silva DA, Macleod MR, Coutts SB, Schwamm LH, Davis SM, et al. Ischaemic stroke. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2019) 5:70. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0118-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Sims NR, Yew WP. Reactive astrogliosis in stroke: contributions of astrocytes to recovery of neurological function. Neurochem Int. (2017) 107:88–103. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2016.12.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Levine B, Kroemer G. Biological functions of autophagy genes: a disease perspective. Cell. (2019) 176:11–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Levine B, Kroemer G. Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell. (2008) 132:27–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Mizushima N, Levine B. Autophagy in human diseases. N Engl J Med. (2020) 383:1564–76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2022774

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Wang L, Ye X, Zhao T. The physiological roles of autophagy in the mammalian life cycle. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. (2019) 94:503–16. doi: 10.1111/brv.12464

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Doherty J, Baehrecke EH. Life, death and autophagy. Nat Cell Biol. (2018) 20:1110–7. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0201-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Wang P, Shao BZ, Deng Z, Chen S, Yue Z, Miao CY Autophagy in ischemic stroke. Prog Neurobiol. (2018) 163–164:98–117. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2018.01.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Liu X, Tian F, Wang S, Wang F, Xiong L. Astrocyte autophagy flux protects neurons against oxygen-glucose deprivation and ischemic/reperfusion injury. Rejuvenation Res. (2018) 21:405–15. doi: 10.1089/rej.2017.1999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Zha H, Fan Y, Yang L, Yin M, Miao W, He J, et al. Autophagy protects against cerebral ischemic reperfusion injury by inhibiting neuroinflammation. Am J Transl Res. (2021) 13:4726-37.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

13. Mizushima N. A brief history of autophagy from cell biology to physiology and disease. Nat Cell Biol. (2018) 20:521–7. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0092-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Mo Y, Sun YY, Liu KY. Autophagy and inflammation in ischemic stroke. Neural Regen Res. (2020) 15:1388–96. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.274331

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Khandia R, Dadar M, Munjal A, Dhama K, Karthik K, Tiwari R, et al. A comprehensive review of autophagy and its various roles in infectious, non-infectious, and lifestyle diseases: current knowledge and prospects for disease prevention, novel drug design, and therapy. Cells. (2019) 8:674. doi: 10.3390/cells8070674

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Holczer M, Hajdu B, Lorincz T, Szarka A, Banhegyi G, Kapuy O. A double negative feedback loop between mTORC1 and AMPK Kinases guarantees precise autophagy induction upon cellular stress. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:5543. doi: 10.3390/ijms20225543

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Holczer M, Hajdu B, Lorincz T, Szarka A, Banhegyi G, Kapuy O. Fine-tuning of AMPK-ULK1-mTORC1 regulatory triangle is crucial for autophagy oscillation. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:17803. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75030-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Wu W, Stork B. Regulating RIPK1: another way in which ULK1 contributes to survival. Autophagy. (2020) 16:1544–6. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1783110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Yamasaki A, Jin Y, Ohsumi Y. Mitotic phosphorylation of the ULK complex regulates cell cycle progression. PLoS Biol. (2020) 18:e3000718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000718

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Birgisdottir AB, Mouilleron S, Bhujabal Z, Wirth M, Sjottem E, Evjen G, et al. Members of the autophagy class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex I interact with GABARAP and GABARAPL1 via LIR motifs. Autophagy. (2019) 15:1333–55. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1581009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Dooley HC, Razi M, Polson HE, Girardin SE, Wilson MI, Tooze SA. WIPI2 links LC3 conjugation with PI3P, autophagosome formation, and pathogen clearance by recruiting Atg12-5-16L1. Mol Cell. (2014) 55:238–52. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Nishimura T, Mizushima N. The ULK complex initiates autophagosome formation at phosphatidylinositol synthase-enriched ER subdomains. Autophagy. (2017) 13:1795–6. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1358344

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Gomez-Sanchez R, Tooze SA, Reggiori F. Membrane supply and remodeling during autophagosome biogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. (2021) 71:112–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2021.02.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Nascimbeni AC, Codogno P, Morel E. Local detection of PtdIns3P at autophagosome biogenesis membrane platforms. Autophagy. (2017) 13:1602–12. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1341465

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Yun HR, Jo YH, Kim J, Shin Y, Kim SS, Choi TG. Roles of autophagy in oxidative stress. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21:3289. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093289

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Xiong Q, Li W, Li P, Yang M, Wu C, Eichinger L. The role of ATG16 in Autophagy and the Ubiquitin Proteasome System. Cells. (2018) 8:2. doi: 10.3390/cells8010002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Mizushima N. The ATG conjugation systems in autophagy. Curr Opin Cell Biol. (2020) 63:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.12.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Wible DJ, Chao HP, Tang DG, Bratton SB. ATG5 cancer mutations and alternative mRNA splicing reveal a conjugation switch that regulates ATG12-ATG5-ATG16L1 complex assembly and autophagy. Cell Discov. (2019) 5:42. doi: 10.1038/s41421-019-0110-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Lystad AH, Carlsson SR, Simonsen A. Toward the function of mammalian ATG12-ATG5-ATG16L1 complex in autophagy and related processes. Autophagy. (2019) 15:1485–6. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1618100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Yang A, Hacheney I, Wu YW. Semisynthesis of autophagy protein LC3 conjugates. Bioorg Med Chem. (2017) 25:4971–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.05.051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Cao W, Li J, Yang K, Cao D. An overview of autophagy: Mechanism, regulation and research progress. Bull Cancer. (2021) 108:304–22. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.11.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Melia TJ, Lystad AH, Simonsen A. Autophagosome biogenesis: from membrane growth to closure. J Cell Biol. (2020) 219:e202002085. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202002085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Takahashi Y, He H, Tang Z, Hattori T, Liu Y, Young MM, et al. An autophagy assay reveals the ESCRT-III component CHMP2A as a regulator of phagophore closure. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:2855. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05254-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Takahashi Y, Liang X, Hattori T, Tang Z, He H, Chen H, et al. VPS37A directs ESCRT recruitment for phagophore closure. J Cell Biol. (2019) 218:3336–54. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201902170

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Koyama-Honda I, Tsuboyama K, Mizushima N. ATG conjugation-dependent degradation of the inner autophagosomal membrane is a key step for autophagosome maturation. Autophagy. (2017) 13:1252–3. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1319041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Jiang W, Chen X, Ji C, Zhang W, Song J, Li J, et al. Key regulators of autophagosome closure. Cells. (2021) 10:2814. doi: 10.3390/cells10112814

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Zhao YG, Codogno P, Zhang H. Machinery, regulation and pathophysiological implications of autophagosome maturation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2021) 22:733–50. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00392-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Zhao YG, Zhang H. Autophagosome maturation: an epic journey from the ER to lysosomes. J Cell Biol. (2019) 218:757–70. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201810099

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Lorincz P, Juhasz G. Autophagosome-Lysosome Fusion. J Mol Biol. (2020) 432:2462–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.10.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Tian X, Teng J, Chen J. New insights regarding SNARE proteins in autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Autophagy. (2021) 17:2680–8. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1823124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Mizushima N, Komatsu M. Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues. Cell. (2011) 147:728–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Kuriakose D, Xiao Z. Pathophysiology and treatment of stroke: present status and future perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21:7609. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207609

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Guo YQ. Role of HIF-1a in regulating autophagic cell survival during cerebral ischemia reperfusion in rats. Oncotarget. (2017) 8:98482–94. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21445

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Lu N, Li XX, Tan RL, An J, Cai ZL, Hu XX, et al. HIF-1 alpha/Beclin1-Mediated autophagy is involved in neuroprotection induced by hypoxic preconditioning. J Mol Neurosci. (2018) 66:238–50. doi: 10.1007/s12031-018-1162-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Xin XY, Pan J, Wang XQ, Ma JF, Ding JQ, Yang GY, et al. 2-methoxyestradiol attenuates autophagy activation after global ischemia. Can J Neurol Sci. (2011) 38:631–8. doi: 10.1017/S031716710001218X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Perez-Alvarez MJ, Villa Gonzalez M, Benito-Cuesta I, Wandosell FG. Role of mTORC1 controlling proteostasis after brain ischemia. Front Neurosci. (2018) 12:60. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00060

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Wang MM, Zhang M, Feng YS, Xing Y, Tan ZX, Li WB, et al. Electroacupuncture inhibits neuronal autophagy and apoptosis via the PI3K/AKT pathway following ischemic stroke. Front Cell Neurosci. (2020) 14:134. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.00134

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Jiang S, Li T, Ji T, Yi W, Yang Z, Wang S, et al. AMPK: potential therapeutic target for ischemic stroke. Theranostics. (2018) 8:4535–51. doi: 10.7150/thno.25674

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Fu L, Huang L, Cao CS, Yin Q, Liu J. Inhibition of AMP-activated protein kinase alleviates focal cerebral ischemia injury in mice: interference with mTOR and autophagy. Brain Res. (2016) 1650:103–11. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.08.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Su Y, Li F. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in brain ischemia. Int J Neurosci. (2016) 126:681–91. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2015.1059836

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Han Y, Yuan M, Guo YS, Shen XY, Gao ZK, Bi X. Mechanism of endoplasmic reticulum stress in cerebral ischemia. Front Cell Neurosci. (2021) 15:704334. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2021.704334

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Liu X, Yamashita T, Shang J, Shi X, Morihara R, Huang Y, et al. Molecular switching from ubiquitin-proteasome to autophagy pathways in mice stroke model. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (2020) 40:214–24. doi: 10.1177/0271678X18810617

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Chen C, Qin H, Tan J, Hu Z, Zeng L. The role of Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway and Autophagy-Lysosome Pathway in cerebral ischemia. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2020) 2020:5457049. doi: 10.1155/2020/5457049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Gabryel B, Kost A, Kasprowska D, Liber S, Machnik G, Wiaderkiewicz R, et al. AMP-activated protein kinase is involved in induction of protective autophagy in astrocytes exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation. Cell Biol Int. (2014) 38:1086–97. doi: 10.1002/cbin.10299

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Nikoletopoulou V, Papandreou ME, Tavernarakis N. Autophagy in the physiology and pathology of the central nervous system. Cell Death Differ. (2015) 22:398–407. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Komatsu M, Waguri S, Chiba T, Murata S, Iwata J-i, Tanida I, et al. Loss of autophagy in the central nervous system causes neurodegeneration in mice. Nature. (2006) 441:880–4. doi: 10.1038/nature04723

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Hara T, Nakamura K, Matsui M, Yamamoto A, Nakahara Y, Suzuki-Migishima R, et al. Suppression of basal autophagy in neural cells causes neurodegenerative disease in mice. Nature. (2006) 441:885–9. doi: 10.1038/nature04724

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Wang S, Li B, Qiao H, Lv X, Liang Q, Shi Z, et al. Autophagy-related gene Atg5 is essential for astrocyte differentiation in the developing mouse cortex. EMBO Rep. (2014) 15:1053–61. doi: 10.15252/embr.201338343

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Dikic I, Elazar Z. Mechanism and medical implications of mammalian autophagy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2018) 19:349–64. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0003-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Hou K, Xu D, Li F, Chen S, Li Y. The progress of neuronal autophagy in cerebral ischemia stroke: mechanisms, roles and research methods. J Neurol Sci. (2019) 400:72–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.03.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Pamenter ME, Perkins GA, McGinness AK, Gu XQ, Ellisman MH, Haddad GG. Autophagy and apoptosis are differentially induced in neurons and astrocytes treated with an in vitro mimic of the ischemic penumbra. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e51469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Qin AP, Liu CF, Qin YY, Hong LZ, Xu M, Yang L, et al. Autophagy was activated in injured astrocytes and mildly decreased cell survival following glucose and oxygen deprivation and focal cerebral ischemia. Autophagy. (2010) 6:738–53. doi: 10.4161/auto.6.6.12573

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Zhou XY, Luo Y, Zhu YM, Liu ZH, Kent TA, Rong JG, et al. Inhibition of autophagy blocks cathepsins-tBid-mitochondrial apoptotic signaling pathway via stabilization of lysosomal membrane in ischemic astrocytes. Cell Death Dis. (2017) 8:e2618. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.34

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Han B, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Bai Y, Chen X, Huang R, et al. Novel insight into circular RNA HECTD1 in astrocyte activation via autophagy by targeting MIR142-TIPARP: implications for cerebral ischemic stroke. Autophagy. (2018) 14:1164–84. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1458173

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Pan R, Timmins GS, Liu W, Liu KJ. Autophagy mediates astrocyte death during zinc-potentiated ischemia–Reperfusion injury. Biol Trace Elem Res. (2015) 166:89–95. doi: 10.1007/s12011-015-0287-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Zhao F, Qu Y, Wang H, Huang L, Zhu J, Li S, et al. The effect of miR-30d on apoptosis and autophagy in cultured astrocytes under oxygen-glucose deprivation. Brain Res. (2017) 1671:67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.06.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Kasprowska D, Machnik G, Kost A, Gabryel B. Time-dependent changes in apoptosis upon autophagy inhibition in astrocytes exposed to oxygen and glucose deprivation. Cell Mol Neurobiol. (2017) 37:223–34. doi: 10.1007/s10571-016-0363-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Switon K, Kotulska K, Janusz-Kaminska A, Justyna ZA, Jaworski J. Molecular neurobiology of mTOR. Neuroscience. (2017) 341:112–53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.11.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Li CY, Li X, Liu SF, Qu WS, Wang W, Tian DS. Inhibition of mTOR pathway restrains astrocyte proliferation, migration and production of inflammatory mediators after oxygen-glucose deprivation and reoxygenation. Neurochem Int. (2015) 83–84:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2015.03.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Zhu C, Zhou Q, Luo C, Chen Y. Dexmedetomidine protects against oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced injury through inducing astrocytes autophagy via TSC2/mTOR pathway. Neuromolecular Med. (2020) 22:210–7. doi: 10.1007/s12017-019-08576-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Garcia D, Shaw RJ. AMPK: mechanisms of cellular energy sensing and restoration of metabolic balance. Mol Cell. (2017) 66:789–800. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Zhang Y, Miao JM. Ginkgolide K promotes astrocyte proliferation and migration after oxygen-glucose deprivation via inducing protective autophagy through the AMPK/mTOR/ULK1 signaling pathway. Eur J Pharmacol. (2018) 832:96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.05.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Liang J, Zhang L, Cheng W. Non-coding RNA-mediated autophagy in cancer: a protumor or antitumor factor? Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. (2021) 1876:188642. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188642

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Mehta SL, Chokkalla AK, Vemuganti R. Noncoding RNA crosstalk in brain health and diseases. Neurochem Int. (2021) 149:105139. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2021.105139

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Akkoc Y, Gozuacik D. MicroRNAs as major regulators of the autophagy pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. (2020) 1867:118662. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118662

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Zhou D, Huang Z, Zhu X, Hong T, Zhao Y. Circular RNA 0025984 ameliorates ischemic stroke injury and protects astrocytes through miR-143-3p/TET1/ORP150 pathway. Mol Neurobiol. (2021) 58:5937–53. doi: 10.1007/s12035-021-02486-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Xie Y, Kang R, Sun X, Zhong M, Huang J, Klionsky DJ, et al. Posttranslational modification of autophagy-related proteins in macroautophagy. Autophagy. (2015) 11:28–45. doi: 10.4161/15548627.2014.984267

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Wang R, Wang G. Protein modification and autophagy activation. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2019) 1206:237–59. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-0602-4_12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Bánréti A, Sass M, Graba Y. The emerging role of acetylation in the regulation of autophagy. Autophagy. (2013) 9:819–29. doi: 10.4161/auto.23908

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Son SM, Park SJ, Stamatakou E, Vicinanza M, Menzies FM, Rubinsztein DC. Leucine regulates autophagy via acetylation of the mTORC1 component raptor. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:3148. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16886-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Pyo KE, Kim CR, Lee M, Kim JS, Kim KI, Baek SH. ULK1 O-GlcNAcylation is crucial for activating VPS34 via ATG14L during autophagy initiation. Cell Rep. (2018) 25:2878–90.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Tang HW, Weng JH, Lee WX, Hu Y, Gu L, Cho S, et al. mTORC1-chaperonin CCT signaling regulates m(6)A RNA methylation to suppress autophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2021) 118:e2021945118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021945118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Rahman MA, Hwang H, Cho Y, Rhim H. Modulation of O-GlcNAcylation regulates autophagy in cortical astrocytes. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2019) 2019:6279313. doi: 10.1155/2019/6279313

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Feng X, Zhang H, Meng L, Song H, Zhou Q, Qu C, et al. Hypoxia-induced acetylation of PAK1 enhances autophagy and promotes brain tumorigenesis via phosphorylating ATG5. Autophagy. (2021) 17:723–42. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1731266

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Shukla S, Patric IR, Patil V, Shwetha SD, Hegde AS, Chandramouli BA, et al. Methylation silencing of ULK2, an autophagy gene, is essential for astrocyte transformation and tumor growth. J Biol Chem. (2014) 289:22306–18. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.567032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Wang X, Feng L, Xin M, Hao Y, Wang X, Shang P, et al. Mechanisms underlying astrocytic connexin-43 autophagy degradation during cerebral ischemia injury and the effect on neuroinflammation and cell apoptosis. Biomed Pharmacother. (2020) 127:110125. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Kulkarni A, Dong A, Kulkarni VV, Chen J, Laxton O, Anand A, et al. Differential regulation of autophagy during metabolic stress in astrocytes and neurons. Autophagy. (2020) 16:1651–67. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1703354

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Moruno-Manchon JF, Uzor NE, Ambati CR, Shetty V, Putluri N, Jagannath C, et al. Sphingosine kinase 1-associated autophagy differs between neurons and astrocytes. Cell Death Dis. (2018) 9:521. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0599-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Sun J, Yue F. Suppression of REDD1 attenuates oxygen glucose deprivation/reoxygenation-evoked ischemic injury in neuron by suppressing mTOR-mediated excessive autophagy. J Cell Biochem. (2019) 120:14771–9. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28737

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Zhang DM, Zhang T, Wang MM, Wang XX, Qin YY, Wu J, et al. TIGAR alleviates ischemia/reperfusion-induced autophagy and ischemic brain injury. Free Radic Biol Med. (2019) 137:13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.04.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Guo X, Wang Y, Zheng D, Cheng X, Sun Y. LncRNA-MIAT promotes neural cell autophagy and apoptosis in ischemic stroke by up-regulating REDD1. Brain Res. (2021) 1763:147436. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147436

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Zhao J, Dong Y, Chen X, Xiao X, Tan B, Chen G, et al. p53 inhibition protects against neuronal ischemia/reperfusion injury by the p53/PRAS40/mTOR pathway. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2021) 2021:4729465. doi: 10.1155/2021/4729465

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Xu Q, Guohui M, Li D, Bai F, Fang J, Zhang G, et al. lncRNA C2dat2 facilitates autophagy and apoptosis via the miR-30d-5p/DDIT4/mTOR axis in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. Aging. (2021) 13:11315–35. doi: 10.18632/aging.202824

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Dai SH, Chen T, Li X, Yue KY, Luo P, Yang LK, et al. Sirt3 confers protection against neuronal ischemia by inducing autophagy: involvement of the AMPK-mTOR pathway. Free Radic Biol Med. (2017) 108:345–53. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.04.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Liu N, Peng A, Sun H, Zhuang Y, Yu M, Wang Q, et al. LncRNA AC136007.2 alleviates cerebral ischemic-reperfusion injury by suppressing autophagy. Aging. (2021) 13:19587–97. doi: 10.18632/aging.203369

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Xu ZQ, Zhang JJ, Kong N, Zhang GY, Ke P, Han T, et al. Autophagy is involved in neuroprotective effect of Alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor on ischemic stroke. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:676589. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.676589

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Wang P, Liang J, Li Y, Li J, Yang X, Zhang X, et al. Down-regulation of miRNA-30a alleviates cerebral ischemic injury through enhancing beclin 1-mediated autophagy. Neurochem Res. (2014) 39:1279–91. doi: 10.1007/s11064-014-1310-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Guo D, Ma J, Yan L, Li T, Li Z, Han X, et al. Down-regulation of Lncrna MALAT1 attenuates neuronal cell death through suppressing Beclin1-dependent autophagy by regulating Mir-30a in cerebral ischemic stroke. Cell Physiol Biochem. (2017) 43:182–94. doi: 10.1159/000480337

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Wang P, Xu TY, Wei K, Guan YF, Wang X, Xu H, et al. ARRB1/beta-arrestin-1 mediates neuroprotection through coordination of BECN1-dependent autophagy in cerebral ischemia. Autophagy. (2014) 10:1535–48. doi: 10.4161/auto.29203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Mo Y, Sun YY, Yue E, Liu Y, Liu KY. MicroRNA-379-5p targets MAP3K2 to reduce autophagy and alleviate neuronal injury following cerebral ischemia via the JNK/c-Jun signaling pathway. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. (2022) 38:230–43. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12488

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Liu Y, Xue X, Zhang H, Che X, Luo J, Wang P, et al. Neuronal-targeted TFEB rescues dysfunction of the autophagy-lysosomal pathway and alleviates ischemic injury in permanent cerebral ischemia. Autophagy. (2019) 15:493–509. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1531196

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Chen L, Xia YF, Shen SF, Tang J, Chen JL, Qian K, et al. Syntaxin 17 inhibits ischemic neuronal injury by resuming autophagy flux and ameliorating endoplasmic reticulum stress. Free Radic Biol Med. (2020) 160:319–33. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.08.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Pan Q, Liu Y, Wang G, Wen Z, Wang Y. MTMR14 protects against cerebral stroke through suppressing PTEN-regulated autophagy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2020) 529:1045–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.06.096

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Singh A, Wilson JW, Schofield CJ, Chen R. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors induce autophagy and have a protective effect in an in-vitro ischaemia model. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:1597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58482-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Vavilis T, Delivanoglou N, Aggelidou E, Stamoula E, Mellidis K, Kaidoglou A, et al. Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation (OGD) modulates the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) and inflicts autophagy in a PC12 hypoxia cell line model. Cell Mol Neurobiol. (2016) 36:701–12. doi: 10.1007/s10571-015-0250-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Hua R, Han S, Zhang N, Dai Q, Liu T, Li J. cPKCgamma-modulated sequential reactivation of mTOR inhibited autophagic flux in neurons exposed to oxygen glucose deprivation/reperfusion. Int J Mol Sci. (2018) 19:1380. doi: 10.3390/ijms19051380

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Yuan YJ, Ye Z, Yu H, Chen Y, Wang YW, Zhao JH, et al. Shrm4 contributes to autophagy inhibition and neuroprotection following ischemic stroke by mediating GABAB receptor activation. FASEB J. (2020) 34:15837–48. doi: 10.1096/fj.202000458RR

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Shen XY, Gao ZK, Han Y, Yuan M, Guo YS, Bi X. Activation and role of astrocytes in ischemic stroke. Front Cell Neurosci. (2021) 15:755955. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2021.755955

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Wang JL, Xu CJ. Astrocytes autophagy in aging and neurodegenerative disorders. Biomed Pharmacother. (2020) 122:109691. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109691

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Filomeni G, De Zio D, Cecconi F. Oxidative stress and autophagy: the clash between damage and metabolic needs. Cell Death Differ. (2015) 22:377–88. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.150

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Lee SJ, Cho KS, Koh JY. Oxidative injury triggers autophagy in astrocytes: the role of endogenous zinc. Glia. (2009) 57:1351–61. doi: 10.1002/glia.20854

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Huang Y, Liao Y, Zhang H, Li S. Lead exposure induces cell autophagy via blocking the Akt/mTOR signaling in rat astrocytes. J Toxicol Sci. (2020) 45:559–67. doi: 10.2131/jts.45.559

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Kim YK, Yoon HH, Lee YD, Youn DY, Ha TJ, Kim HS, et al. Anthocyanin extracts from black soybean (Glycine max L.) protect human glial cells against oxygen-glucose deprivation by promoting autophagy. Biomol Ther. (2012) 20:68–74. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2012.20.1.068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Takahama M, Akira S, Saitoh T. Autophagy limits activation of the inflammasomes. Immunol Rev. (2018) 281:62–73. doi: 10.1111/imr.12613

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Tsapras P, Nezis IP. Caspase involvement in autophagy. Cell Death Differ. (2017) 24:1369–79. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2017.43

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Xu HD, Qin ZH. Beclin 1, Bcl-2 and Autophagy. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2019) 1206:109–26. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-0602-4_5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Zhang P, Yang L, He H, Deng Y. Differential variations of autophagy and apoptosis in permanent focal cerebral ischaemia rat model. Brain Inj. (2017) 31:1151–8. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2017.1298005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Maejima Y, Isobe M, Sadoshima J. Regulation of autophagy by Beclin 1 in the heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. (2016) 95:19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.10.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Tran S, Fairlie WD, Lee EF. BECLIN1: protein structure, function and regulation. Cells. (2021) 10:1522. doi: 10.3390/cells10061522

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Huang W, Lv B, Zeng H, Shi D, Liu Y, Chen F, et al. Paracrine factors secreted by MSCs promote astrocyte survival associated with GFAP downregulation after ischemic stroke via p38 MAPK and JNK. J Cell Physiol. (2015) 230:2461–75. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24981

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Du J, Zhang C, Na X, Li A, Zhang Q, Li K, et al. Andrographolide protects mouse astrocytes against hypoxia injury by promoting autophagy and S100B expression. Braz J Med Biol Res. (2018) 51:e7061. doi: 10.1590/1414-431x20177061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Khoury MK, Gupta K, Franco SR, Liu B. Necroptosis in the pathophysiology of disease. Am J Pathol. (2020) 190:272–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.10.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Ryan F, Khodagholi F, Dargahi L, Minai-Tehrani D, Ahmadiani A. Temporal pattern and crosstalk of necroptosis markers with autophagy and apoptosis associated proteins in ischemic hippocampus. Neurotox Res. (2018) 34:79–92. doi: 10.1007/s12640-017-9861-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Ni Y, Gu WW, Liu ZH, Zhu YM, Rong JG, Kent TA, et al. RIP1K contributes to neuronal and astrocytic cell death in ischemic stroke via activating autophagic-lysosomal pathway. Neuroscience. (2018) 371:60–74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.10.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Çetin G, Klafack S, Studencka-Turski M, Krüger E, Ebstein F. The Ubiquitin-Proteasome system in immune cells. Biomolecules. (2021) 11:60. doi: 10.3390/biom11010060

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Ji CH, Kwon YT. Crosstalk and interplay between the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System and Autophagy. Mol Cells. (2017) 40:441–9. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2017.0115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Ge PF, Zhang JZ, Wang XF, Meng FK, Li WC, Luan YX, et al. Inhibition of autophagy induced by proteasome inhibition increases cell death in human SHG-44 glioma cells. Acta Pharmacol Sin. (2009) 30:1046–52. doi: 10.1038/aps.2009.71

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Jänen SB, Chaachouay H, Richter-Landsberg C. Autophagy is activated by proteasomal inhibition and involved in aggresome clearance in cultured astrocytes. Glia. (2010) 58:1766–74. doi: 10.1002/glia.21047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Yuan R, Hahn Y, Stempel MH, Sidibe DK, Laxton O, Chen J, et al. Proteasomal inhibition preferentially stimulates lysosome activity relative to autophagic flux in primary astrocytes. Autophagy. (2022) 1–27. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2022.2084884 [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Wu S, Yin Y, Du L. FUS aggregation following ischemic stroke favors brain astrocyte activation through inducing excessive autophagy. Exp Neurol. (2022) 355:114144. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.114144

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Liu Z, Chopp M. Astrocytes, therapeutic targets for neuroprotection and neurorestoration in ischemic stroke. Prog Neurobiol. (2016) 144:103–20. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.09.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Zhang Z, Sun GY, Ding S. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and focal ischemic stroke. Neurochem Res. (2021) 46:2638–50. doi: 10.1007/s11064-021-03266-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Xu S, Lu J, Shao A, Zhang JH, Zhang J. Glial cells: role of the immune response in ischemic stroke. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:294. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00294

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Wang XS, Yue J, Hu LN, Tian Z, Zhang K, Yang L, et al. Activation of G protein-coupled receptor 30 protects neurons by regulating autophagy in astrocytes. Glia. (2020) 68:27–43. doi: 10.1002/glia.23697

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Xin MY. Protection of Autophagy in Ischemic Brain Injury and the Neuroprotective Mechanism of Salvianolic Acid B Base on AMPK/mTOR/ULK1 Pathway. [Doctor]. [City]: Jilin University (2020).

Google Scholar

136. Han H, Liu W J, Chen F, Li N. Effect of dendrobium officinale polysaccharides on autophagy related to AMPK/ULK1 pathway induced by Hypoxia/Reoxygenation in Astrocytes. Chin J Mod Appl Pharm. (2021) 38:2110–5. doi: 10.13748/j.cnki.issn1007-7693.2021.17.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Xu L, Ji H, Jiang Y, Cai L, Lai X, Wu F, et al. Exosomes derived from CircAkap7-modified adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells protect against cerebral ischemic injury. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2020) 8:569977. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.569977

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Wang S, Cao X, Duan Y, Zhang G. Delta Opioid Peptide [d-Ala2, d-Leu5] Enkephalin (DADLE) exerts a cytoprotective effect in astrocytes exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation by inducing autophagy. Cell Transplant. (2019) 28:775–82. doi: 10.1177/0963689719825619

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Pengyue Z, Tao G, Hongyun H, Liqiang Y, Yihao D. Breviscapine confers a neuroprotective efficacy against transient focal cerebral ischemia by attenuating neuronal and astrocytic autophagy in the penumbra. Biomed Pharmacother. (2017) 90:69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.03.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Li L B, Chen B, Qian Y, Li QY. Effects of nimodipine on autophagy in rats with cerebral ischemia. J Jiangsu Univ. (2019) 29:123–127+146. doi: 10.13312/j.issn.1671-7783.y180219

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Sun Y, Wang Q, Ji W, Luo W. [Propofol attenuates excessive autophagy induced by astrocyte oxygen glucose deprivation injury]. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. (2019) 48:553–5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2019.07.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: ischemic stroke, autophagy, astrocyte, apoptosis, drug therapy

Citation: Su P-W, Zhai Z, Wang T, Zhang Y-N, Wang Y, Ma K, Han B-B, Wu Z-C, Yu H-Y, Zhao H-J and Wang S-J (2022) Research progress on astrocyte autophagy in ischemic stroke. Front. Neurol. 13:951536. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.951536

Received: 24 May 2022; Accepted: 28 July 2022;
Published: 30 August 2022.

Edited by:

Bruno Meloni, University of Western Australia, Australia

Reviewed by:

Feng Zhang, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, China
Ning Chen, Sichuan University, China

Copyright © 2022 Su, Zhai, Wang, Zhang, Wang, Ma, Han, Wu, Yu, Zhao and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hai-Jun Zhao, aGFpanVuemhhbyYjeDAwMDQwO3NkdXRjbS5lZHUuY24=; Shi-Jun Wang, cGF0aG9sb2d5JiN4MDAwNDA7MTYzLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.