Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Neurol., 01 August 2022
Sec. Neurogenetics
This article is part of the Research Topic Neurogenetics – Case Report Collection 2022 View all 28 articles

The gene diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type I with headache as the main symptom: A case report and review of the literature

\nMing Gao&#x;Ming Gao1Haokun Liu&#x;Haokun Liu2Qiying SunQiying Sun1Guang Yang
Guang Yang3*
  • 1Department of Geriatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
  • 2Department of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
  • 3Department of General Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China

Neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) is an autosomal dominant disease. Some NF1 patients experience atypical clinical manifestations, genetic testing is not widely available, and the types of mutations vary; thus, they are prone to misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. Although headache is not included in the diagnostic criteria for NF1, the incidence of headache in NF1 patients is not low. We report an NF1 family in which the proband presented with prominent headache and atypical clinical presentation, with limited skin pigmentation. We identified a frameshift mutation (c.1541_1542del, p. Q514Rfs*) in the NF1 gene by whole-exome sequencing of this family, and the patients were diagnosed with NF1. We hope to attract the attention of clinicians to these patients and improve genetic testing as soon as possible to increase the diagnosis rate.

Introduction

Neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) is an autosomal dominant condition with a prevalence of ~1/2,500–1/3,500 (1). According to the diagnostic criteria set by the National Institutes of Health, NF1 has two or more of the following characteristics: six or more café au lait patches, two or more neurofibromas, or one plexiform neurofibroma, axillary or inguinal freckling, Lisch nodules, optic glioma, a first-degree relative diagnosed with NF1, or a characteristic osseous lesion (2, 3). However, until genetic testing results emerge, a significant number of patients exhibit atypical manifestations [Such as headache (4), abdominal pain (5, 6), asthenia (7, 8), and shortness of breath (9)]. Although some skin manifestations may occur, they can be easily missed by clinicians. Therefore, physicians must raise awareness regarding NF1 and be vigilant for its atypical clinical symptoms.

Headache is the most common neurological symptom and is not specific. However, the incidence of headache in NF1 patients was not low. In some surveys, the incidence of headache in NF1 patients ranged from 25 to 30%, with an average of one in every three to four patients (10). Here, we report an NF1 family in which the proband presented with headache as the prominent clinical presentation and only some café au lait patches. The laboratory examination results were unremarkable. Head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed multiple abnormal signal foci in the bilateral basal ganglia, thalamus, and pons. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) identified a frameshift mutation (p. Q514Rfs*). Headache is not included in the diagnostic criteria for NF1 because it is not specific; however, we hope to improve clinicians' understanding of such patients and conduct genetic testing to confirm the disease as soon as possible.

Case description

A 13-year-old adolescent boy presented with the chief complaint of recurrent headache for 1 month. One month prior to the consult, the patient developed headache without an obvious trigger, mainly concentrated in the left temporo-occipital region, mild to moderate (2–4 points, total score of 10 points) (11), usually characterized by dull pain, accompanied by vascular pulsation, and occasionally tingling, lasting from several seconds to several minutes, and had four to five attacks in the preceding month. There were no prodromal or accompanying symptoms of aura, photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, or change in level of consciousness. No dizziness or any other neurological symptoms were noted. The patient had no history of hypertension, migraines, sinusitis, or the use of drugs that could cause headaches as an adverse effect. The patient was transferred to our hospital due to headache of unknown cause.

Systemic examination revealed a light brown plaque with clear boundaries of different sizes scattered on the chest and abdomen, back, shoulder, and left upper arm, not protruding from the skin surface, and with a diameter of 0.3–8.0 cm (Figure 1). The patient's mother had similar skin manifestations, but did not have headaches. The laboratory examination results were unremarkable. We performed a lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid examination, which showed no significant abnormalities. Both autoimmune encephalopathy antibodies and central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating antibodies were negative. MRI of the head revealed multiple abnormal signal foci in the bilateral basal ganglia, thalamus, and pons (Figure 2). Based on these clinical and MRI findings, we suspected that the patient had NF1.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Light brown plaques were seen on the chest and abdomen (A), back (B), shoulder (C), and left upper arm (D).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. MRI showed multiple abnormal signal foci in bilateral basal ganglia, thalamus, and pons.

DNA extraction for WES and MLPA for NF1 and NF2 genes from the peripheral blood of the pedigree was performed after obtaining written informed consent. After data filtering, we identified a frameshift mutation (c.1541_1542del; p. Q514Rfs*) in the NF1 gene in the proband and his mother (Figure 3). The same mutation was not detected in the proband's father (Figure 3). Based on the above clinical symptoms, MRI findings, and genetic testing results, the patient was diagnosed with NF1.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. (A) Pedigree of the family affected with NF1. (B) Sequencing results of the NF1 mutation.

We then administered relevant symptomatic supportive treatment to the patient. After 4 months of follow-up, the frequency and severity of the patient's headache had reduced compared with those previously reported by the patient, and no progression of NF1-related complications was found. We will continue to follow-up the patient and adjust the treatment plan according to changes in his condition.

Discussion

The patient had multiple skin café au lait spots and pigmentation and had a family history of similar conditions, but neither he nor his parents noticed these symptoms. Doctors at local hospitals were also ignored. The patient was transferred to our hospital with headache of unknown cause and was eventually diagnosed with NF1 by genetic testing.

NF1 is a syndrome characterized by a series of clinical symptoms caused by mutations in the NF1 gene, which can affect multiple organ systems in the skin, nervous system, skeleton, and eyes (12). Although international diagnostic criteria for NF1 have been proposed, they do not include all clinical manifestations of NF1. Therefore, clinicians should not blindly comply with these diagnostic criteria to avoid missing atypical cases before obtaining genetic testing results. In addition to headaches, we have also summarized some atypical clinical symptoms of NF1 reported in previous English-language literature, which have not been included in the diagnostic criteria, to help enhance the vigilance of clinicians (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Atypical symptoms of NF1 cases reported in English clinical literature.

Headache is not uncommon in NF1 patients, but its cause is unclear. NF1 patients with headache were mostly caused by nonsense mutations, frame shift mutations and splicing mutations in the NF1 gene, which can lead to truncated protein and cause more serious clinical manifestations (2124). Some other studies have suggested that the occurrence of headache in NF1 patients may be related to imaging abnormalities (mostly bright hippocampi and focal areas of signal intensity) (25). The lesions may purportedly affect the brain structures involved in headache pathophysiology, such as the brainstem and thalamus, and abnormalities in these regions have been reported in the scans of nine migraine patients (25, 26). We also observed multiple abnormal signal foci in our patient's thalamus. This suggests that the patient's headache might have been related to these imaging abnormalities. However, in addition to NF1, other CNS diseases, such as infection, autoimmune encephalopathy, and CNS demyelination, may also lead to similar imaging findings. Therefore, we performed lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid examination, including assessments for autoimmune encephalopathy antibodies and CNS demyelinating antibodies, all of which yielded negative results. This suggests that the patient's imaging abnormalities were most likely due to NF1 rather than other diseases. However, some studies suggest that although NF1 patients have intracranial structural changes or an increased frequency of cerebral anomalies, this is not a causal relationship with headache (2729). Some patients also develop headache without intracranial lesions. Therefore, further studies are needed to investigate the pathophysiological mechanisms of headache in NF1 patients.

NF1 is the result of mutations in the tumor suppressor gene NF1 on chromosome 17q11.2, and more than 2,600 different NF1 gene mutations have been found in the Human Gene Mutation Database (30). NF1 mutations are diverse, including missense/nonsense, splicing, microdeletion, microinsertion, total deletion, total insertion, and complex rearrangement (12). Therefore, gene detection should include WES and MLPA to avoid omission. Consequently, NF1 patients are many times more likely to develop tumors that are most common in the nervous system, such as optic gliomas, neurofibromas, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (31). Tumors of the skin and gastrointestinal tract are also common (32). This may be an important reason why the lifespan of NF1 patients is 15 years shorter than that of the general population (33). Therefore, it is particularly important to conduct genetic testing for patients with suspected NF1 as soon as possible. This is conducive to the early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of NF1 to improve prognosis. However, the clinical manifestations and severity of NF1 vary widely between members of the same family and between two individuals with the same mutation. Previously, GIOVANNI reported a 29-year-old Italian woman with giant elephantiasis (34). The mutation was consistent with our reported case after genetic testing (c.1541_1542del; p. Q514Rfs*); thus, the patient was diagnosed with NF1 (35). However, the severity and symptoms of the two diseases are quite different. The female presented mainly with giant elephantiasis of the right leg, which was histopathologically identified as a lymphangioma, with multiple neurofibromas and few café au lait patches. The patient did not exhibit any symptoms of headache nor did he have relevant head MRI findings similar to our case. The reasons for this large difference in phenotypes are complex and may be related to differences in race, environment, and lifestyle. This suggests that, although genetic testing can play a role in the early detection and diagnosis of NF1, clinicians still need to make personalized treatment plans for patients according to their different clinical manifestations.

The current treatments for NF1 mainly focus on early detection, symptomatic treatment, and treatment of complications (36). The patient had no typical symptoms or complications other than cutaneous manifestations. Therefore, in addition to the symptomatic treatment of headache, he will also need long-term follow-up, timely detection, and treatment of related complications.

Conclusion

In this article, we have reported the case of a 13-year-old Chinese NF1 patient with prominent headache. WES and MLPA revealed a frameshift mutation. We have also reviewed the atypical clinical manifestations of NF1 patients reported in English in the past to improve the alertness of clinicians and to emphasize the importance of early genetic testing for these patients.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because of ethical and privacy restrictions. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardian/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s), and minor(s)' legal guardian/next of kin, for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

MG and HL conceptualized the study and drafted the initial manuscript. MG, HL, QS, and GY analyzed and explained the data. QS have collected the data. MG, HL, and GY conceptualized and designed the study, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2021JJ41045, 2021JJ31093) and Natural Science Foundation of Changsha, China (kq2014279).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the patient and family members for agreeing to participate in this study and the help of Mengting Sun, Wenrui Lin, and Zhiwen Ye in data collection.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Anderson JL, Gutmann DH. Neurofibromatosis type 1. Handb Clin Neurol. (2015) 132:75–86. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62702-5.00004-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Razek A. MR imaging of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions of the brain and spine in neurofibromatosis type I. Neurol Sci. (2018) 39:821–7. doi: 10.1007/s10072-018-3284-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ghoneim S, Sandhu S, Sandhu D. Isolated colonic neurofibroma, a rare tumor: a case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases. (2020) 8:1932–8. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i10.1932

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Hanna JA, Mathkour M, Gouveia EE, Lane J, Boehm L, Keen JR, et al. Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma of the pineal region in a pediatric patient with neurofibromatosis type 1. Ochsner J. (2020) 20:226–31. doi: 10.31486/toj.18.0156

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Onitilo AA, Engel JM. A new NF1 variant in a patient with atypical manifestations. Am J Med Genet A. (2013) 161A:389–92. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35728

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Deschamps L, Dokmak S, Guedj N, Ruszniewski P, Sauvanet A, Couvelard A. Mixed endocrine somatostatinoma of the ampulla of vater associated with a neurofibromatosis type 1: a case report and review of the literature. JOP. (2010) 11:64–8. doi: 10.6092/1590-8577/3875

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Van-Gils J, Harambat J, Jubert C, Vidaud D, Llanas B, Perel Y, et al. Atypical hematologic and renal manifestations in neurofibromatosis type I: coincidence or pathophysiological link? Eur J Med Genet. (2014) 57:639–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.09.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Favere AM, Tsukumo DM, Matos PS, Santos SL, Lalli CA. Association between atypical parathyroid adenoma and neurofibromatosis. Arch Endocrinol Metab. (2015) 59:460–6. doi: 10.1590/2359-3997000000092

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Mathew P, Roberts JA, Zwischenberger J, Haque AK. Mediastinal atypical carcinoid and neurofibromatosis type 1. Arch Pathol Lab Med. (2000) 124:319–21. doi: 10.5858/2000-124-0319-MACANT

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. DiMario FJ Jr, Langshur S. Headaches in patients with neurofibromatosis-1. J Child Neurol. (2000) 15:235–8. doi: 10.1177/088307380001500406

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Pinho RS, Fusao EF, Paschoal J, Caran EMM, Minett TSC, Vilanova LCP, et al. Migraine is frequent in children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1. Pediatr Int. (2014) 56:865–7. doi: 10.1111/ped.12375

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Li MZ, Yuan L, Zhuo ZQ. Gene diagnosis of infantile neurofibromatosis type I: a case report. World J Clin Cases. (2020) 8:5678–83. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5678

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Carman K, Yakut A, Anlar B, Ayter S. Spinal neurofibromatosis associated with classical neurofibromatosis type 1: genetic characterisation of an atypical case. BMJ Case Rep. (2013). 2013:bcr2012008468. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-008468

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Gursoy A, Erdogan MF. Severe pulmonary involvement and pheochromocytoma in atypical patient with neurofibromatosis type 1. Endocr Pract. (2006) 12:469–71. doi: 10.4158/EP.12.4.469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Rawal A, Yin Q, Roebuck M, Sinopidis C, Kalogrianitis S, Helliwell TR, et al. Atypical and malignant peripheral nerve-sheath tumors of the brachial plexus: report of three cases and review of the literature. Microsurgery. (2006) 26:80–6. doi: 10.1002/micr.20188

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Stavrinides V, Nasra S. A case of persistent foot pain in a neurofibromatosis type I patient. Case Rep Med. (2012) 2012:479632. doi: 10.1155/2012/479632

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Bianco G, Greco G, Antonelli M, Casali S, Castagnini C. An histologically atypical NF-type 1 patient with a new pathogenic mutation. Neurol Sci. (2012) 33:1483–5. doi: 10.1007/s10072-011-0897-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Tripolszki K, Farkas K, Sulak A, Szolnoky G, Duga B, Melegh B, et al. Atypical neurofibromatosis type 1 with unilateral limb hypertrophy mimicking overgrowth syndrome. Clin Exp Dermatol. (2017) 42:763–6. doi: 10.1111/ced.13154

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Havlovicova M, Novotna D, Kocarek E, Novotna K, Bendova S, Petrak B, et al. A girl with neurofibromatosis type 1, atypical autism and mosaic ring chromosome 17. Am J Med Genet A. (2007) 143A:76–81. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Mastrangelo M, Mariani R, Spalice A, Ruggieri M, Iannetti P. Complex epileptic (Foix-Chavany-Marie like) syndrome in a child with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and bilateral (opercular and paracentral) polymicrogyria. Acta Paediatr. (2009) 98:760–2. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01183.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Yimenicioglu S, Yakut A, Karaer K, Zenker M, Ekici A, Carman KB, et al. new nonsense mutation in the NF1 gene with neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome phenotype. Childs Nerv Syst. (2012) 28:2181–3. doi: 10.1007/s00381-012-1905-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Zhou S, Zhu Y, Xu J, Tao R, Yuan S. Rare NF1 gene mutation in Chinese patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 and anaplastic astrocytoma. World Neurosurg. (2020) 134:434–7. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Banerjee S, Dai Y, Liang S, Chen H, Wang Y, Tang L, et al. A novel mutation in NF1 is associated with diverse intra-familial phenotypic variation and astrocytoma in a Chinese family. J Clin Neurosci. (2016) 31:182–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.12.034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Superina RA, Wood KJ, Morris PJ. The effect of pretreatment with a single cloned donor class I gene product on cardiac allograft survival in mice. Transplantation. (1987) 44:719–21. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198711000-00025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Afridi SK, Leschziner GD, Ferner RE. Prevalence and clinical presentation of headache in a National Neurofibromatosis 1 Service and impact on quality of life. Am J Med Genet A. (2015) 167A:2282–5. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37186

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Akerman S, Holland PR, Goadsby PJ. Diencephalic and brainstem mechanisms in migraine. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2011) 12:570–84. doi: 10.1038/nrn3057

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Creange A, Zeller J, Rostaing-Rigattieri S, Brugieres P, Degos JD, Revuz J, et al. Neurological complications of neurofibromatosis type 1 in adulthood. Brain. (1999) 122:473–81. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.3.473

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Clementi M, Battistella PA, Rizzi L, Boni S, Tenconi R. Headache in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Headache. (1996) 36:10. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1996.3601010.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. DiMario FJ Jr, Ramsby G, Greenstein R, Langshur S, Dunham B. Neurofibromatosis type 1: magnetic resonance imaging findings. J Child Neurol. (1993) 8:32–9. doi: 10.1177/088307389300800105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Messiaen LM, Callens T, Mortier G, Beysen D, Vandenbroucke I, Van Roy N, et al. Exhaustive mutation analysis of the NF1 gene allows identification of 95% of mutations and reveals a high frequency of unusual splicing defects. Hum Mutat. (2000) 15:541–55. doi: 10.1002/1098-1004(200006)15:6<541::AID-HUMU6>3.0.CO;2-N

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Longo JF, Weber SM, Turner-Ivey BP, Carroll SL. Recent advances in the diagnosis and pathogenesis of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated peripheral nervous system neoplasms. Adv Anat Pathol. (2018) 25:353–68. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000197

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Barahona-Garrido J, Aguirre-Gutierrez R, Gutierrez-Manjarrez JI, Tellez-Avila FI, Lopez-Arce G, Fomperoza-Torres A, et al. Association of GIST and somatostatinoma in a patient with type-1 neurofibromatosis: is there a common pathway? Am J Gastroenterol. (2009) 104:797–9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.133

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Rasmussen SA, Yang Q, Friedman JM. Mortality in neurofibromatosis 1: an analysis using US death certificates. Am J Hum Genet. (2001) 68:1110–8. doi: 10.1086/320121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Shen MH, Harper PS, Upadhyaya M. Molecular genetics of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). J Med Genet. (1996) 33:2–17. doi: 10.1136/jmg.33.1.2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Ponti G, Pellacani G, Martorana D, Mandel VD, Loschi P, Pollio A, et al. Giant elephantiasis neuromatosa in the setting of neurofibromatosis type 1: a case report. Oncol Lett. (2016) 11:3709–14. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Zeng Y, Xiong F, Hu H. An infant of neurofibromatosis with external genitalia involvement presentation. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. (2013) 51:865–6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2013.11.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: neurofibromatosis type I, headache, gene diagnosis, atypical manifestation, literature review

Citation: Gao M, Liu H, Sun Q and Yang G (2022) The gene diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type I with headache as the main symptom: A case report and review of the literature. Front. Neurol. 13:874613. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.874613

Received: 12 February 2022; Accepted: 04 July 2022;
Published: 01 August 2022.

Edited by:

Félix Javier Jiménez-Jiménez, Hospital Universitario del Sureste, Spain

Reviewed by:

Lorenzo Pavone, University of Catania, Italy
Marina Shulskaya, Institute of Molecular Genetics (RAS), Russia

Copyright © 2022 Gao, Liu, Sun and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Guang Yang, eWFuZ19uZXVyb2xvZ3kmI3gwMDA0MDsxNjMuY29t

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.