Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 13 January 2022
Sec. Movement Disorders

Lower GDNF Serum Level Is a Possible Risk Factor for Constipation in Patients With Parkinson Disease: A Case–Control Study

  • 1Department of Neurobiology, Xuzhou Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
  • 2Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Shuyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Yangzhou Medical University, Suqian, China
  • 3Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
  • 4Department of Neurology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China
  • 5Department of Geriatrics, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Background: Constipation is a significant symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). Glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is important for the morphogenesis of the enteric nervous system and plays a critical role in the preservation of mucosal integrity under enteric glia surveillance. The aim of this work was to evaluate the serum levels of GDNF in patients with PD with and without constipation.

Methods: This work included 128 patients with PD. The patients were classified into three groups: those with PD but no constipation (nCons-PD) (n = 49), those with prodromal stage constipation (Cons-Pro-PD) (n = 48), and those with clinical stage constipation (Cons-Clinic-PD) (n = 31). The association between serum GDNF concentration and constipation was explored using logical regression.

Results: The nCons-PD group's mean GDNF levels were 528.44 pg/ml, which was higher than the Cons-Pro-PD group's 360.72 pg/ml and the Cons-Clinic-PD group's 331.36 pg/ml. The results of binary logistic regression indicated that GDNF was a protective factor in the prevention of constipation. Cons-Clinic-PD group had a higher score of MDS-UPDRS-II, MDS-UPDRS-III, MDS-UPDRS-IV, and a higher H-Y staging as compared with nCons-PD group. Relative to the nCons-PD group, Cons-Clinic-PD had higher NMSS scores, lower MoCA and PDSS scores, and were more likely to have RBD.

Conclusions: GDNF serum levels are lower in patients with PD who are constipated. A low GDNF level is a potential risk factor for constipation in patients with PD.

Introduction

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative condition, affecting 2–3% of the population over the age of 65 (1) worldwide and 1.7% of the population over the age of 65 years in China (2), and it is an incurable multisystem condition that causes severe morbidity and healthcare burden. PD is currently diagnosed based on the existence of motor defects such as bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor, which normally manifest unilaterally or asymmetrically (3). The motor features are primarily the result of dopaminergic neuron failure in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), and by the time of clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, patients have usually already undergone significant neuronal loss (4).

Although the clinical effects of dopamine deficiency are used to diagnose PD, this disease is associated with other neurotransmitter deficiencies that are known to trigger a variety of motor and non-motor symptoms (NMS) and indications. The symptoms and signs, such as hyposmia, REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), depression, and gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction, have gained increasing attention and have an effect on the quality of life (QoL) (5). GI dysfunctions are the most common NMS of PD, affecting ~65% (6) of the patients and having a significant negative effect on the QoL. Constipation, bloating, drooling, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, and gastroparesis are common GI symptoms that can occur up to 20 years before motor symptoms (7). Constipation is a significant symptom of PD and one of the first (NMS) to appear during the prodromal phase (8). Constipation in PD is caused by slowed passage of fecal material through the colon, which is seen in up to 80% of the patients (9). It can occur up to 15 years before motor symptoms and is included in the research criteria for prodromal PD diagnostics as one of the risk factors for potential PD development (10). It has been reported that intestinal smooth muscle cells and enterocytes secrete GDNF (11, 12). GDNF is a member of the transforming growth factor-superfamily that can promote and defend the survival of several different types of neurons, including dopaminergic neurons, motor neurons, sensory neurons, and intestinal neurons. In the intestine, glial cells are an important component of intestinal cells. They are found underneath epithelial cells in the gastrointestinal mucosa, they influence epithelial barrier function, and GDNF was previously believed to be primarily secreted by enteric glial cells. The correlation between constipation in patients with PD and glial cell line derived neurotrophic factor is elusive. In patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease, decreased peripheral serum GDNF levels have been observed (13). For the past few decades, our laboratory has focused on investigating the protective effects of GDNF on dopaminergic neurons. According to one of our studies, low serum GDNF levels predict cognitive impairment in PD (14). As such, multiple studies have explored the association between PD and intestinal nervous system, intestinal glial cells, and constipation, but it is perplexing whether GDNF serum level is a risk factor in patients with PD with constipation.Here, we report an association of GDNF serum level and constipation in patients with PD using logistic regression model. Results predict that GDNF is a protective factor in the prevention of constipation implying that a low GDNF level is a risk factor for constipation in'patients with PD.

Methods

Study Setting and Subjects

Between October 2018 and August 2020, subjects were recruited from the clinic or as in-patients at the Department of Neurology, Xuzhou Central Hospital/Clinical Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, China. Two experienced neurologists gathered and analyzed extensive demographic details, medical history, disease course, motor symptoms, and non-motor symptoms.

Inclusion criteria for patients with PD were (1) Age ≥18 years old, (2) ability to complete all neuropsychological, clinical, and behavioral tests under the supervision of a physician, as well as to listen, talk, read, and comprehend, (3) two qualified neurologists independently diagnosed PD using the UK Brain Bank Criteria (15), with reference to the Movement Disorder Society diagnostic criteria (16). Secondary parkinsonism caused by drugs, head trauma, vascular disease, or another cause, Parkinsonism and other neurodegenerative disorders, patients with organic digestive tract disorders and a history of digestive tract surgery, systemic diseases such as heart, liver, and renal disease, as well as other diseases that may impair GI function, were excluded.

Ethics Approval

The Ethics Committee of the Xuzhou Central Hospital in China authorized this study (approval No. XZXY-LJ-20190307-008). The subjects themselves signed informed consent documents.

Sample Collection

Patients were asked to fast beginning from 22:00 for samples to be collected the next morning. Five milliliters of blood was collected from each patient (between 07:00 and 08:00). The samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 4°C at 1,000 g. The samples were placed at room temperature for up to 2 h before centrifugation. To avoid destroying the serum components, they were immediately dispensed into 130 uL Eppendorf tubes and processed at −80°C for later assays. After collecting serum from all subjects, GDNF levels in patients with PD were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits in strict compliance with the manufacturers' instructions.

Data Collection

Movement disorder specialists conducted in-person interviews to gather demographic, general information, and clinical data. Two among them clinically evaluated PD subjects in an “ON” state. Standard methods for measuring daily levodopa equivalent doses were used to compare medications (LEDmg). The severity of PD was determined using the Hoehn-Yahr (H&Y) stage and the Movement Disorder Society—Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Using the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, the study described the tremor dominant (TD) and postural instability/gait difficulty (PIGD) phenotypes of PD (MDS-UPDRS). The PD non-motor symptoms scale (PD-NMSS), Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA), Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire (RBD-SQ), restless leg syndrome (RLS) diagnosis, Parkinson's disease sleep scale (PDSS), minimental state examination (MMSE), and Montreal cognitive assessment were used to assess non-motor symptoms (MoCA). The ROME IV functional constipation criteria were used to describe constipation. In this study, patients were divided into three groups: those who have PD with constipation (Cons-PD) and those who do not have constipation (nCons-PD). We also asked if constipation occurred before or after the onset of motor symptoms in the Cons-PD population. Patients with constipation before the onset of motor symptoms were referred to as the prodromal stage constipation group (Cons-Pro-PD), and those with constipation after the onset of motor symptoms were referred to as the clinical stage constipation group (Cons-clinic-PD). The Patient Assessment of Constipation–Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAC-QOL) was used in patients with PD with constipation to assess their physical status, psychological status, worry, social relations, and satisfaction, whereas the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms (PAC-SYM) questionnaire was used to assess the severity of constipation symptoms mentioned by patients.

Statistical Analysis

The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to confirm the normal distribution of all data. The normally distributed indices, such as age, age of onset of motor symptoms, body mass index (BMI), and Moca global score, were expressed as the mean standard deviation (SD). Since the data such as education, disease length, HAMA, ESS, PDSS, MMSE, PD-NMSS, HAMA, and HAMD were not normally distributed, they were interpreted as the median (interquartile range) [M (QR)]. When comparing multiple classes, the parameters were analyzed using one-way ANOVA if the data matched the normal distribution. If the data did not correspond to the normal distribution, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to evaluate the non-parametric comparison between the three classes, followed by the Bonferroni test for pairwise comparison to correct the P value and monitor the total likelihood of type I error. To compare variations between categorical variables, Chi-squared tests were used. Constipation risk factors were investigated using binary logistic regression. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. SPSS, version 22, was used to analyze the data (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA).

Results

Demographic Characteristics

This study included 128 patients with PD who were classified into three groups: those who did not have constipation (nCons-PD) (n = 49), those who had prodromal constipation (Cons-Pro-PD) (n = 48), and those who did have clinical constipation (Cons-Clinic-PD) (n = 31) (Table 1). The study gathered education (years), body mass index (BMI), history of smoking, alcohol use, exposure to insecticides/herbicides, hypertension, diabetes, stroke, brain trauma, family history of Parkinson's disease, and age of motor symptoms onset from all subjects, with no statistically significant differences observed between the groups (p > 0.05). Age analysis revealed that the nCons-PD group had a lower mean age (64.73 years) than the Cons-pro-PD group (68.35 years, p = 0.048) and the Cons-Clinic-PD group (70.52 years, p = 0.006) (Figure 1A). There were no statistically significant variations observed between the Cons-Pro-PD and Cons-clinic-PD groups (p > 0.05). Cons-clinic-PD had a longer disease span than the Cons-pro-PD and nCons-PD group (Figure 1B). There were no statistically significant discrepancies between the Cons-Pro-PD and nCons-PD group. It is presumed that the prevalence of constipation in PD is linked to disease progression and age.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the subjects in the study.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. (A) compares the ages of the three groups pairwise. The mean age of the nCons-PD group was 64.73 years (SD 9.565, Range 43–82), which was less than that of the Cons-Pro-PD group 68.35 years (SD 8.353, range 49–82, p = 0.048) and Cons-Clinic-PD groups 70.52 years (SD8.733, range 51–87, p = 0.006), with no statistically significant difference between Cons-Pro-PD and Cons-Clinic-PD groups (p > 0.05). (B) shows that the median course of disease in the Cons-Clinic-PD group (M 88 months, QR 48–125) was longer than that of the Cons-Pro-PD group (M 48 months, QR 24–84, p = 0.002) and the nCons-PD group (36 months, QR 15.5–60, p = 0.000), but there was no significant difference in the course of disease between the Cons-pro-PD and nCons-PD groups (p > 0.05).

GDNF Between the Three Groups

On dopaminergic neurons, motor neurons, sensory neurons, intestinal neurons, and other neurons, GDNF promotes longevity and protects against injury. The peripheral serum GDNF levels of the subjects were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method in this study, and it was discovered that serum GDNF levels in the three groups were not essentially the same (p = 0.000). The analysis shows that the Cons-PD group had higher mean GDNF levels (528.44 pg/ml) than the Cons-pro-PD group (360.72 pg/ml p = 0.000) and the Cons-Clinic-PD group (331.36 pg/ml p = 0.000), with no statistically relevant discrepancies found between the Cons-Pro-PD and Cons-clinic-PD groups (p > 0.05) (Figure 5B).

Clinical Characteristics of the Cohort

Motor Symptoms and Constipation

In this analysis, there was no statistical difference in the composition ratio among the motor forms of PD (p > 0.05) in the general clinical characteristics of the subjects of the three groups (Table 2). MDS-UPDRS-II, MDS-UPDRS-III, and MDS-UPDRS-IV were used to assess motor symptoms and motor complications in patients with PD, and the overall scores were not consistent among the three classes (p < 0.05). Further comparison revealed that the differences were primarily reflected in the MDS-UPDRS-II, MDS-UPDRS-III, and MDS-UPDRS-IV scores of the Cons-Clinic-group, which were higher than those of the nCons-PD group MDS-UPDRS-II (p = 0.000) (Figure 2B), MDS-UPDRS-III (P = 0.013) (Figure 2C), and MDS-UPDRS-IV (P = 0.007) (Figure 2D). The median H-Y staging of Cons-Clinic-PD at 3 was higher than the median H-Y staging of nCons-PD at 2 (p = 0.003) in H-Y staging for determining PD intensity based on MDS-UPDRS-III motor function score (p = 0.003) (Figure 2A). There was no statistical difference in H-Y staging between the Cons-pro-PD and nCons-PD groups (p > 0.05) or the Cons-Clinic-PD group (p > 0.05). This suggests that in patients with PD, constipation symptoms signify more serious conditions, more noticeable motor symptoms, and more essential motor complications.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Clinical characteristics of the subjects in the study.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. (A) Shows that H-Y staging in the three groups is compared. Cons-Clinic-PD had a higher median H-Y staging (M 3, QR 2–4) than the nCons-PD group (M 2, QR 1–3, p = 0.003), with no substantial difference in H-Y staging between Cons-pro PD (M 2, QR 2–3) and the nCons-PD group (p > 0.05). MDS-UPDRS-II, MDS-UPDRS-III, and MDS-UPDRS-IV total scores were not equal among the three groups (p < 0.05). The median MDS-UPDRS-II (M 22, QR 15–34), MDS-UPDRS-III (M 48, QR33–80), and mean MDS-UPDRS-IV (M 3.58, range 0–21) of the Cons-Clinic-PD category were all higher compared with MDS-UPDRS-II (M 11, QR 8–19 p = 0.000) (B) MDS-UPDRS-III (M 30, QR 20–48, p = 0.013) (C) and MDS-UPDRS-IV (M 1.204, range 0–18) (D). There was no substantial difference between the Cons-pro-PD group and the nCons-PD group (p > 0.05) or the Cons-Clinic-PD group (p > 0.05).

NMS and Constipation

Non-motor symptoms such as autonomic nervous symptoms, paresthesia, neuropsychiatric symptoms, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and so on are common in patients with PD. Some non-motor symptoms, such as mental disorders, are closely linked to constipation. This study used NMSS and MDS-UPDRS-I to conduct regular assessments of the subjects' non-motor symptoms to investigate the effect of other non-motor symptoms on constipation in patients with PD. The NMSS and MDS-UPDRS-I total scores were not consistent among the three groups (p < 0.05). Further analysis indicated that the variations were primarily expressed in the Cons-Clinic-PD and nCons-PD groups. The NMSS and MDS-UPDRS-I scores in the Cons-Clinic-PD group were higher than those in the nCons-PD group (Figures 3A,B).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. (A) Revealed that the median NMSS score of the Cons-Clinic-PD group (M 61,QR 34–90) was higher than that of the nCons-PD group (M 29,QR 15–55.5, p = 0.002), although no statistically significant difference was observed in nCons-PD (M 29, QR 15–55.5, p > 0.05) and Cons-Clinic-PD (M 61, QR 34–90 p > 0.05). (B) Revealed that the median MDS-UPDRS-I in the nCons-PD group (M 7,QR 4.5–10.5) was lower than in the Cons-Pro-PD group (M 11, QR 7–19.75, p = 0.004) and Cons-Clinic-PD group (p = 0.001), and no statistical difference was found between the Cons-pro-PD and Cons-clinic-PD groups (P > 0.05). (C) Indicates that the mean MoCA of the Cons-Clinic-PD group was 13.10 (SD 6.37) lower than the Cons-Pro-PD group, which was 17.42 (SD 5.78 p = 0.003) and 17.33 (SD 6.56, p = 0.004). There was no substantial difference in the course of disease between the Cons-pro-PD and nCons-PD groups (p > 0.05). (D) Revealed that the median PDSS score of the Cons-Clinic-PD group (M 98,QR 66–113) was lower than the nCons-PD group (M 117, QR 92–129, p = 0.007), and no statistically significant difference was observed in nCons-PD (M117, QR 92–129 p > 0.05) and Cosn-Clinic-PD (M 98, QR 66–113, p > 0.05).

While constipation was one of the non-motor symptoms, it appeared that the Cons-Clinic-PD group had more serious non-motor symptoms. Whether the differences in NMSS and MDS-UPDRS-I scores between the three groups are only caused by constipation, and have nothing to do with other non-motor symptoms, we used MMSE and MoCA to evaluate cognition, HAMA, and HAMD to evaluate mental status, and RBD, RLS, and PDSS to evaluate sleep disorders, respectively, and observed the differences between these clinically common non-motor symptoms among the three groups. Simultaneously, the PAC-SYM and PAC-QOL questionnaires were used to measure the magnitude of constipation symptoms and the impact of constipation on everyday life in patients with PD constipation (Table 2).

Constipation and Cognition

The MMSE rating did not vary between the three groups of subjects, while the MoCA score indicated that the three groups were not absolutely equal, which may be attributed to the fact that the sensitivity of the MoCA scale to cognitive disability was slightly higher than that of the MMSE.

Further investigation revealed that the mean MoCA of the Cons-Clinic-PD patients was lower than that of the Cons-Pro-PD group (13.10 vs. 17.42, p = 0.003) and the nCons-PD group (13.10 vs. 17.33, p = 0.004) (Figure 3D). This indicates that cognitive impairment was more severe in the Cons-Clinic-PD group, whereas there was no statistically significant difference in cognitive impairment between the Cons-Pro-PD group and the nCons-PD group (p > 0.05).

Sleep Disorders and Constipation

The prevalence of RLS did not vary statistically between the three groups (p > 0.05). The ESS was used to assess daytime sleepiness in patients with PD. The three groups were not consistent (p = 0.048), but there was no difference between them in a pairwise comparison (p > 0.05). The prevalence of RBD differed between the three groups (p = 0.007). Further analysis revealed that 10.2% of nCons-PD was lower than 31.3% of Cons-Pro-PD (P < 0.05) and 38.7% of Cons-Clinic-PD (p < 0.05) (Figure 4B), implying that patients with PD who have constipation are more likely to have RBD. The Cons-Clinic-PD group scored lower on the PDSS than the nCons-PD group (p = 0.007) (Figure 3C), indicating that the Cons-Clinic-PD group slept less than the nCons-PD group. There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between Cons-pro-PD and nCons-PD.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. (A) Reveals that 96.8% of individuals in the Cons-clinic-PD group use levodopa, which is higher than 72.9% (p < 0.05) in the Cons-Pro-PD group and 71.4% (p < 0.05) in the nCons-PD group, with no substantial difference (p > 0.05) between the Cons-Pro-PD group (72.9%) and the nCons-PD group (71.4%). (B) Indicates that 10.2% of people in nCons-PD have RBD, which is lower than 31.3% (p < 0.05) in Cons-Pro-PD and 38.7% (p < 0.05) in Cons-clinic-PD, but there is no statistical difference between 31.3% in Cons-Pro-PD and 38.7% (p > 0.05) in Cons-clinic-PD.

Constipation, Anxiety, and Depression

Anxiety and depression have been linked to constipation in the general population, but there was no substantial difference in anxiety or depression among the three groups of patients with PD treated with HAMA or HAMD in this work.

Relationship Between Constipation and Anti-Parkinson's Medications

Anti-Parkinson's medications can cause constipation, and dopaminergic therapy can also cause constipation. A Cochrane metaanalysis discovered that patients taking dopamine agonists had more constipation than those taking levodopa. There was no substantial difference in the constituent ratios of levodopa, dopa receptor agonists, monoamine oxidase-B-inhibitors (MAO-B), anticholinergic agents, catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors, amantadine, and not treated with drugs between the three classes in this sample (p > 0.05). However, the constituent ratios of levodopa patients and the corresponding dose of levodopa (Levodopa equivalent doses, LEDs mg) are not consistent (p = 0.000) (Table 2). LEDs (mg) in the nCons-PD category were lower than in the Cons-Pro-PD group (p = 0.042) and the Cons-Clinic-PD group (p = 0.002) (Figure 5A). There was no statistically relevant difference between Cons-pro-PD and Cons-clinic-PD (p > 0.05). Levodopa was used by 96.8% of the Cons-Clinic-PD group, 72.9% of the Cons-Pro-PD group (p < 0.05), and 71.4% of the nCons-PD group (p < 0.05) (Figure 4A).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. (A) Depicts a pairwise analysis of the three groups' median LEDs (mg). The median LEDs (mg) of the nCons-PD group was 337.5 mg (QR 37.5–400), which was lower than the Cons-Pro-PD group (M 443.75 mg, QR 162.5–600, p = 0.042) and the Cons-Clinic-PD group (M 537.5 mg, QR 400–637.5, p = 0.000), with no statistically relevant difference between the Cons-Pro-PD and Cons-Clinic-PD groups (p > 0.05). (B) Shows that the mean GDNF levels of the nCons-PD group were 528.44 pg/ml (SD 136.87), higher than the Cons-Pro-PD group 360.72 pg/ml (SD 93.18, p = 0.000), and the Cons-Clinic-PD group 331.36 pg/ml (SD 97.737, p = 0.000), with no statistically relevant variations found between the Cons-Pro-PD and Cons-Clinic-PD.

We used the constipation QoL self-rating scale (PAC-QOL) in patients with PD with constipation to assess their physical state, psychological status, worry, social connections, and satisfaction. The Constipation Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (PAC-SYM) was also used to evaluate the seriousness of constipation symptoms recorded by the patients. We compared and analyzed the PAC-SYM and PAC-QOL scores of prodromal and clinical constipation, but no statistical difference was observed between the two classes (p > 0.05).

Constipation Risk Factors

Constipation is correlated with increasing age, female sex, lower socioeconomic status, lower parental education rates, less self-reported physical activity, some drugs, traumatic life events, physical and sexual violence, and depression. We sought to investigate the risk factors for constipation in patients with PD in this study.

A binary logic regression was performed on the subjects with constipation as the dependent variable. The independent variables were sex, age, LED, MDS-UPDRS-I, MDS-UPDRS II, MDS-UPDRS III, MDS-UPDRS IV, H-Ystage, NMSS total score, MoCA total score, RLS, PDSS total score, ESS total score, age of onset of motor symptoms, GDNF, RBD, and the motor forms of Parkinson's disease. The final variables chosen in the model using the forward (wald) approach for data analysis and processing were age, LEDs (mg), MDS-UPDRS-III, H-Y stage, age of motor symptoms, GDNF, and RBD (χ2 = 129.945, p = 0.000). GDNF is a protective factor in the prevention of constipation after adjusting for age, LED, MDS-UPDRS-III, H-Y stage, age of motor symptoms, and RBD (B = −0.106, Wald = 19.486, p = 0.000, OR = 0.899, 95% C.I 0.858–0.943) (Table 3). In the discrimination of predicting the impact of constipation, the regression model uses the occurrence of constipation as the endpoint and the prediction likelihood of 0.5 as the discriminant point; the sensitivity for deciding the occurrence of constipation is 96.2%, the precision is 87.8%, and the overall correct rate is 93.0%. Table 3 is the result of binary logic regression with constipation as a dependent variable, suggesting that GDNF is a protective factor in the prevention of constipation.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Binary logistic regression between PD with constipation and PD with no constipation cohort.

Discussion

Constipation is a frequently occurring NMS of PD, and it is one of the first NMS to appear in the prodromal phase of the disease. The cause of constipation in PD is still uncertain, and the prevalence of constipation varies. The estimated incidence of constipation in patients with PD diverges widely across individual studies, ranging from 8 to 70% in PD (17). The overall incidence of constipation in this work was 61.7%, which was consistent with previous works.

In 2003, Braak and colleagues proposed that PD pathology may begin in the digestive tract and spread to the brain through the vagus nerve (18), and much work has since been done to validate this theory. What is clear, however, is the existence of Lewy bodies (and/or a-synuclein inclusions and Lewy neurites) in PD at almost every stage of the GI tract (19). Enteroendocrine cells in the gut epithelium, which face the lumen and are linked to enteric nerves, have been identified as a possible site where different toxic substances may interact with a-syn, eventually leading to the assembly and spread of pathological a-syn to the myenteric plexus (20). A new mouse model (21) was developed recently to support the Braak hypothesis of the temporal and stereotypical spread of LBs pathology from gut to brain, leading to clinical features of idiopathic Parkinson's disease, including both motor and NMS. Pathological a-syn preformed fibrils were injected into the duodenal and pyloric muscularis layers in that study. Pathologic a-syn spread in the brain was first found in the dorsal motor nucleus, then in caudal parts of the hindbrain, like the locus coeruleus, and much later in the basolateral amygdala, dorsal raphe nucleus, and the SNc. Furthermore, dopaminergic neuron loss, as well as motor and NMS, were observed in a related temporal pattern. This may be a pathological cause of constipation in some patients with PD prior to the onset of motor symptoms. Nonetheless, our basic understanding of the underlying causes of constipation is minimal, and it is debatable to what extent the enteric nervous system itself degenerates in Parkinson's disease.

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor is essential for the regulation of the intestinal barrier. Several studies have found that EGC-derived GDNF improves tight junction organization in intestinal epithelial cells (22). GDNF reduces inflammation-induced impairment of ntestinal epithelial barrier (IEB) function caused by DSG2 loss through p38 MAPK–dependent phosphorylation of cytokeratin (23). As a result, GDNF promotes homeostasis and wound healing in the gut epithelium. Moreover, there are studies embarked on GDNF serum level vs. neurological diseases. For example, Tang and colleagues revealed a low BDNF and GDNF serum level in Chinese male patients with schizophrenia (24). A similar study by Xiao et al. reported a GDNF serum level reduction in patients with cognitive impairment (25). GDNF serum level has enormously implicated in many other neurological disorders (2628). These are consistent with our findings which revealed a reduced GDNF serum levels in patients with PD who are constipated.

The gut microbiota is increasingly being recognized as a possible player in understanding the pathogenesis and response to treatment in patients with PD (29). A study reported that the gut microbiota is required for the development of motor deficits, reduced intestinal transit, and a-synuclein pathology in a-synuclein-overexpressing mice (30). This research also found that fecal microbiota transplantation from patients with PD exacerbated motor symptoms in germ-free mice, implying that the gut microbiota plays a role in the control of a-synucleinopathy and movement disorders. Short-chain fatty acids and extracellular fibers, such as curli, formed by microbes in the gastrointestinal tract, have been shown in studies to cause a-syn aggregation and motor dysfunction (30). Our findings indicate that serum GDNF levels are lower in patients with PD who are constipated. We propound that low GDNF levels cause more easily impaired intestinal mucosal barrier function, more difficult intestinal mucosal repair, changes in intestinal permeability, and a more susceptible intestinal nervous system to intestinal flora, all of which may be linked to the “second hit” of Braak theory, which is one of the causes of PD constipation. The clinical symptoms of patients with PD with constipation are more apparent after motor symptoms, leading one to speculate that the presence of constipation symptoms aggravates the effect of microflora on the intestinal tract and promotes disease development.

In adults, the prevalence of constipation seems to increase with age and is higher in elderly patients than in younger adults, possibly owing to the degeneration of epithelial, muscle, and neural cells of the colon and pelvic floor (31). This study discovered that the average age of PD without constipation was lower than that of the Cons-Prod-PD group and the Cons-clinic-PD group, implying that age is a risk factor for constipation and that the incidence of PD constipation is also related to age, which is consistent with the previous survey. Meanwhile, we discovered that the duration of disease in the Cons-clinic-PD group was longer than in the Cons-Pro-PD group and nCons-PD group, implying that the risk of constipation increased as the disease course was prolonged. The analysis of gender differences in the occurrence of constipation in PD is not entirely consistent. Some studies have indicated that the incidence of constipation is slightly higher in women with PD, but it has also been stated that the incidence of constipation in men is slightly higher. According to a recent metaanalysis, the prevalence of constipation was not significantly associated with sex (32), and this study did not find that the incidence of constipation is linked to gender.

Slow passage constipation is characterized as decreased motility and frequency of mass movements, resulting in general slow transit throughout the colon, whereas outlet obstruction is defined as a lack of relaxation of the puborectalis muscle or anal sphincters during defecation. Both forms have been studied and verified in'patients with PD (33); however, there is still a lack of direct evidence linking the onset and progression of PD and motor symptoms. Khedr and colleagues investigated moderate-stage PD and discovered that 64% of the akinetic-rigid population was constipated vs. 49% in the tremor group (34). In a review of de novo PD, these figures were 45 vs. 21% (35). However, this study found no difference in the occurrence of constipation between activity types.

According to a metaanalysis, the occurrence of constipation is correlated with a rise in clinical disease phases (17). In this study, it was found that the H-Y staging in the clinical stage of PD group with constipation was higher than that in the non-constipation group, and the MDS-UPDRS-II, MDS-UPDRS-III, and MDS-UPDRS-IV scores in the clinical stage of PD group were all higher than those in the non-constipation group. These findings indicate that patients with PD with constipation symptoms have a more serious illness, motor symptoms are more apparent, and motor problems are more severe.

Non-motor symptoms (NMS) are, by all accounts, very common in people with PD. In two trials, nearly 100% of patients reported at least one non-motor symptom (36). Symptoms other than motor function, which Dr. Parkinson describes as NMS, are sleep disturbances, gastrointestinal dysfunction, bladder dysfunction, and even fatigue (extreme exhaustion). PD non-motor symptoms are not independent of one another. Visual hallucinations have been related to perceptual, executive, and sleep dysfunction in Parkinson's disease, and they most likely represent the distribution of Lewy body pathology (37). Anxiety, sometimes in conjunction with depression, may arise prior to the initiation of motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, implying that this symptom is linked to pathology beyond the nigrostriatal pathway. According to one study, stress is a contributing factor for PD constipation (38). Constipation is more common in patients with PD with RBD sleep disturbance (39). In this work, when NMS were compared between groups, it was discovered that NMS were more severe in the Cons-clinic-PD group, and cognitive and sleep problems were more noticeable in the nCons-PD group than in the nCons-PD group. The incidence of RBD was lower in the nCons-PD party. We hypothesize that constipation develops after the clinical symptoms of Parkinson's disease, and that NMS, such as cognitive dysfunction and sleep disturbances, develop more rapidly.

Constipation is a frequent complication of many PD medications, including anticholinergics, dopamine agonists, and dopaminergic treatments (40). The LED (mg) of the nCons-PD group was lower than that of the Cons-Pro-PD and Cons-clinic-PD groups in this analysis. In the Cons-clinic-PD group, 96.8% used levodopa, compared with 72.9% in the Cons-Pro-PD group and 71.4% in the nCons-PD group, which was consistent with the previous survey.

In conclusion, the motor and NMS were more noticeable in the Cons-clinic-PD group than in the nCons-PD group. We postulate that constipation predicts a faster course of PD in patients. In this work, we selected to examine general motor symptoms, non-motor symptoms, substance use, as well as cognitive, sleep, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. In clinical work, these metrics are common, easy to get, and cost-effective, and they would not imperil patients throughout the assessment process. This study also investigated if serum GDNF might be utilized as a predictor. In the established regression model, our data showed that GDNF had a protective function in PD constipation symptoms, and that low levels of GDNF were a risk factor for PD constipation symptoms.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Xuzhou Central Hospital in China. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

GC, QX-l, and GD-s conceived the project and designed the study. GC wrote the manuscript. GC, YD, and YX performed the experiments. PK provided scientific input and English-editing work. GC, LW, LZ-l, XZ-e, and XL performed clinical peripheral blood samples collection and scale evaluation from PD patients. GC, CT, and MS contributed to analysis. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 81971006, to DS).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all members of the Neurobiology laboratory past and present who participated in this project.

References

1. Kaplin AI, Williams M. How common are the “common” neurologic disorders? Neurology. (2007) 6:410. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000278071.91524.4d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Zhang Z, Roman G, Hong Z, Wu C, Qu Q, Huang J, et al. Parkinson's disease in China: prevalence in Beijing, Xian, and Shanghai. Lancet. (2005) 365:595–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736 (05)70801-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Berardelli A, Wenning GK, Antonini A, Berg D, Bloem BR, Bonifati V, et al. EFNS/MDS-ES recommendations for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Euro J Neurol. (2013) 20:16–34. doi: 10.1111/ene.12022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Stern MB, Siderowf A. Parkinson's at risk syndrome: can Parkinson's disease be predicted? Mov Disord. (2010) 25:S89–93. doi: 10.1002/mds.22719

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Pfeiffer RF. Gastrointestinal dysfunction in Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. (2003) 2:107–16. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422 (03)00307-7.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Makaroff L, Gunn A, Gervasoni C, Richy F. Gastrointestinal disorders in Parkinson's disease: prevalence and health outcomes in a US claims database. J Parkinsons Dis. (2011) 1:65–74. doi: 10.3233/JPD-2011-001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Savica R, Carlin JM, Grossardt BR, Bower JH, Ahlskog JE, Maraganore DM, et al. Medical records documentation of constipation preceding Parkinson Disease: a case-control study. Neurology. (2009) 73:1752–8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c34af5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Adams-Carr KL, Bestwick JP, Shribman S, Lees A, Schrag A, Noyce AJ. Constipation preceding Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2016) 87:710–6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-311680

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Knudsen K, Fedorova TD, Bekker AC, Iversen P, Ostergaard K, Krogh K, et al. Objective colonic dysfunction is far more prevalent than subjective constipation in Parkinson's Disease: a colon transit and volume study. J Parkinsons Dis. (2017) 7:359–67. doi: 10.3233/JPD-161050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Berg D, Postuma RB, Adler CH, Bloem BR, Chan P, Dubois B, et al. MDS research criteria for prodromal Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. (2015) 30:1600–11. doi: 10.1002/mds.26431

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Rao M, Rastelli D, Dong L, Chiu S, Setlik W, Gershon MD, et al. Enteric glia regulate gastrointestinal motility but are not required for maintenance of the epithelium in mice. Gastroenterology. (2017) 153:1068–81. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Brun P, Gobbo S, Caputi V, Spagnol L, Schirato G, Pasqualin M, et al. Toll like receptor-2 regulates production of glial-derived neurotrophic factors in murine intestinal smooth muscle cells. Mol Cell Neurosci. (2015) 68:24–35. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2015.03.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Forlenza OV, Miranda AS, Guimar I, Talib LL, Diniz BS, Gattaz WF, et al. Decreased neurotrophic support is associated with cognitive decline in non-demented subjects. J Alzheimers Dis. (2015) 46:423–9. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150172

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Shi MY, Ma CC, Chen FF, Zhou XY, Li X, Tang CX, et al. Possible role of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor for predicting cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: a case-control study. Neural Regen Res. (2021) 16:885–92. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.297091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (1992) 55:181–4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M, Poewe W, Olanow CW, Oertel W, et al. MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. (2015) 30:1591–601. doi: 10.1002/mds.26424

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Knudsen K, Krogh K, Ostergaard K, Borghammer P. Constipation in parkinson's disease: subjective symptoms, objective markers, and new perspectives. Mov Disord. (2017) 32:94–105. doi: 10.1002/mds.26866

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Braak H, Ghebremedhin E, Rub U, Bratzke H, Del Tredici K. Stages in the development of Parkinson's disease-related pathology. Cell Tissue Res. (2004) 318:121–34. doi: 10.1007/s00441-004-0956-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Gelpi E, Navarro-Otano J, Tolosa E, Gaig C, Compta Y, Rey MJ, et al. Multiple organ involvement by alpha-synuclein pathology in Lewy body disorders. Mov Disord. (2014) 29:1010–8. doi: 10.1002/mds.25776

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Chandra R, Hiniker A, Kuo Y, Nussbaum R, Liddle R. α-Synuclein in gut endocrine cells and its implications for Parkinson's disease. JCI Insight. (2017) 2:12. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.92295

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Kim S, Kwon SH, Kam TI, Panicker N, Karuppagounder SS, Lee S, et al. Transneuronal propagation of pathologic alpha-synuclein from the gut to the brain models Parkinson's Disease. Neuron. (2019) 103:627–4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Xiao W, Wang W, Chen W, Sun L, Li X, Zhang C, et al. GDNF is involved in the barrier-inducing effect of enteric glial cells on intestinal epithelial cells under acute ischemia reperfusion stimulation. Mol Neurobiol. (2014) 50:274–89. doi: 10.1007/s12035-014-8730-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Meir M, Burkard N, Ungewiss H, Diefenbacher M, Flemming S, Kannapin F, et al. Neurotrophic factor GDNF regulates intestinal barrier function in inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Invest. (2019) 129:2824–40. doi: 10.1172/JCI120261

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Tang X, Zhou C, Gao J, Duan W, Yu M, Xiao W, et al. Serum BDNF and GDNF in Chinese male patients with deficit schizophrenia and their relationships with neurocognitive dysfunction. BMC Psychiatry. (2019) 19:254. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2231-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Xiao W, Ye F, Liu C, Tang X, Li J, Dong H, et al. Cognitive impairment in first-episode drug-naive patients with schizophrenia: relationships with serum concentrations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (2017) 76:163–168. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.03.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Man L, Lv X, Du XD, Yin G, Zhu X, Zhang Y, et al. Cognitive impairments and low BDNF serum levels in first-episode drug-naive patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. (2018) 263:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.02.034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Niitsu T, Shirayama Y, Matsuzawa D, Shimizu E, Hashimoto K, Iyo M. Association between serum levels of glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor and attention deficits in schizophrenia. Neurosci Lett. (2014) 575:37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.05.034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Ye F, Zhan Q, Xiao W, Sha W, Zhang X. Altered serum levels of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in male chronic schizophrenia patients with tardive dyskinesia. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. (2018) 27:e1727. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1727

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Lubomski M, Davis RL, Sue CM. The gut microbiota: a novel therapeutic target in Parkinson's disease? Parkinsonism Relat Disord. (2019) 66:265–266. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.08.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Sampson TR, Debelius JW, Thron T, Janssen S, Shastri GG, Ilhan ZE, et al. Gut microbiota regulate motor deficits and neuroinflammation in a model of Parkinson's Disease. Cell. (2016) 167:1469–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Vriesman MH, Koppen IJN, Camilleri M, Di Lorenzo C, Benninga MA. Management of functional constipation in children and adults. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2020) 17:21–39. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0222-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Iwaki H, Blauwendraat C, Leonard HL, Makarious MB, Kim JJ, Liu G, et al. Differences in the presentation and progression of Parkinson's Disease by sex. Mov Disord. (2021) 36:106–17. doi: 10.1002/mds.28312

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Borghammer P, Knudsen K, Brooks DJ. Imaging systemic dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. (2016) 16:51. doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0655-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Khedr EM, El Fetoh NA, Khalifa H, Ahmed MA, El Beh KM. Prevalence of non motor features in a cohort of Parkinson's disease patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2013) 115:673–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.07.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Pont-Sunyer C, Hotter A, Gaig C, Seppi K, Compta Y, Katzenschlager R, et al. The onset of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (the ONSET PD study). Mov Disord. (2015) 30:229–37. doi: 10.1002/mds.26077

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Krishnan S, Sarma G, Sarma S, Kishore A. Do nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson's disease differ from normal aging? Mov Disord. (2011) 26:2110–3. doi: 10.1002/mds.23826

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Muller AJ, Shine JM, Halliday GM, Lewis SJ. Visual hallucinations in Parkinson's disease: theoretical models. Mov Disord. (2014) 29:1591–8. doi: 10.1002/mds.26004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Xiao-Ling Q, Gang C, Bo L, Zai-Li L, Xue-Kui L, Xue L, et al. Depression is associated with constipation in patients with Parkinson's Disease. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:567574. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.567574

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Ferini-Strambi L, Oertel W, Dauvilliers Y, Postuma RB, Marelli S, Iranzo A, et al. Erratum to: autonomic symptoms in idiopathic REM behavior disorder: a multicentre case-control study. J Neurol. (2015) 262:249–50. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7609-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Fasano A, Visanji NP, Liu LW, Lang AE, Pfeiffer RF. Gastrointestinal dysfunction in Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. (2015) 14:625–39. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422 (15)00007-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: GDNF (glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor), Parkinson's disease, constipation, gastrointestinal dysfunction, enteric nervous system (ENS)

Citation: Chen G, Du Y, Li X, Kambey PA, Wang L, Xia Y, Tang C, Shi M, Zai-li L, Zai-e X, Xiao-ling Q and Dian-shuai G (2022) Lower GDNF Serum Level Is a Possible Risk Factor for Constipation in Patients With Parkinson Disease: A Case–Control Study. Front. Neurol. 12:777591. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.777591

Received: 15 September 2021; Accepted: 25 November 2021;
Published: 13 January 2022.

Edited by:

Chiayu Chiu, Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile

Reviewed by:

Michael David Gershon, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, United States
Malco Rossi, Fundación Para la Lucha Contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (FLENI), Argentina

Copyright © 2022 Chen, Du, Li, Kambey, Wang, Xia, Tang, Shi, Zai-li, Zai-e, Xiao-ling and Dian-shuai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Qin Xiao-ling, doctorqx0@126.com; Gao Dian-shuai, gds@xzhmu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.