Case Report: Could Hennebert's Sign Be Evoked Despite Global Vestibular Impairment on Video Head Impulse Test? Considerations Upon Pathomechanisms Underlying Pressure-Induced Nystagmus due to Labyrinthine Fistula

We describe a case series of labyrinthine fistula, characterized by Hennebert's sign (HS) elicited by tragal compression despite global hypofunction of semicircular canals (SCs) on a video-head impulse test (vHIT), and review the relevant literature. All three patients presented with different amounts of cochleo-vestibular loss, consistent with labyrinthitis likely induced by labyrinthine fistula due to different temporal bone pathologies (squamous cell carcinoma involving the external auditory canal in one case and middle ear cholesteatoma in two cases). Despite global hypofunction on vHIT proving impaired function for each SC for high accelerations, all patients developed pressure-induced nystagmus, presumably through spared and/or recovered activity for low-velocity canal afferents. In particular, two patients with isolated horizontal SC fistula developed HS with ipsilesional horizontal nystagmus due to resulting excitatory ampullopetal endolymphatic flows within horizontal canals. Conversely, the last patient with bony erosion involving all SCs developed mainly torsional nystagmus directed contralaterally due to additional inhibitory ampullopetal flows within vertical canals. Moreover, despite impaired measurements on vHIT, we found simultaneous direction-changing positional nystagmus likely due to a buoyancy mechanism within the affected horizontal canal in a case and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo involving the dehiscent posterior canal in another case. Based on our findings, we might suggest a functional dissociation between high (impaired) and low (spared/recovered) accelerations for SCs. Therefore, it could be hypothesized that HS in labyrinthine fistula might be due to the activation of regular ampullary fibers encoding low-velocity inputs, as pressure-induced nystagmus is perfectly aligned with the planes of dehiscent SCs in accordance with Ewald's laws, despite global vestibular impairment on vHIT. Moreover, we showed how pressure-induced nystagmus could present in a rare case of labyrinthine fistulas involving all canals simultaneously. Nevertheless, definite conclusions on the genesis of pressure-induced nystagmus in our patients are prevented due to the lack of objective measurements of both low-acceleration canal responses and otolith function.

Introduction

Pressure-induce nystagmus (PIN), also known as Hennebert's sign (HS), represents a peculiar finding indicating a third window mechanism within the inner ear. It can be elicited either by pressure changes exerted on the external auditory canal (EAC) with tragal compressions or a Politzer bulb, or increasing intracranial/middle-ear pressure through Valsalva maneuvers. It can be found in several labyrinthine disorders with normal otoscopic findings including otosyphilis (1), perilymphatic fistula (2, 3), Meniere's disease (4, 5), vestibular atelectasis (6, 7), hypermobile stapes footplate (8), semicircular canal (SC) dehiscence (9, 10), and other dehiscences between the otic capsule and surrounding structures (11, 12). Similarly, chronic inflammatory pathologies involving the middle ear may lead to labyrinthine fistula (LF) due to otic capsule erosions, accounting for pressure transmission from tympanic cavity into the inner ear (13–19). In the latter case, other classical symptoms and signs of third window syndromes including bone-conducted hyperacusis, sound-induced vertigo (Tullio phenomenon), abnormally enhanced amplitudes and reduced threshold for vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) may be partially or totally hidden by underlying middle ear pathologies.

The pathogenetic mechanism underlying HS is still controversial. In particular, it is unclear whether endolymphatic or perilymphatic flows are involved and which subgroup of hair cells among ampullary and/or otolith receptors represents the target sensor (4–7, 20–28).

Unlike caloric irrigations measuring horizontal SC (HSC) activity in low-acceleration ranges, the video head impulse test (vHIT) represents a recently introduced test assessing the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) of each SC for high accelerations (29). Its diagnostic accuracy is based on Ewalds's laws, stating that stimulation of each canal produces eye rotations around an axis parallel to that of the canal, that ampullopetal endolymphatic flows represent excitatory stimuli for HSC while inhibitory for vertical SCs, and that stronger oculomotor responses are derived from excitatory inputs (30).

Here, we describe three patients with LF due to different temporal bone pathologies presenting with HS and positional nystagmus despite global SCs hypofunction on vHIT. We discuss the possible pathomechanisms underlying PIN and positional nystagmus and we also review the relevant literature.

Case Descriptions

Patient 1

An 83-year-old female presented with long-lasting left ear discharge, hearing loss (HL), and recent onset of headache. Her history was consistent with bilateral chronic otitis media (COM) and diabetes mellitus, whereas she denied oscillopsia, pressure-induced vertigo, or other vestibular symptoms. On otoscopy, her left EAC was obliterated by polypoid soft tissue. Pure tone audiometry detected ipsilateral profound HL and right-sided mixed HL (Figure 1A). Vestibular examination with video-Frenzel goggles showed neither spontaneous nor positional nystagmus. Nevertheless, left tragal compression evoked strong left-beating horizontal nystagmus that reversed on release of the positive pressure on EAC (Supplementary Video 1). Neither glottic nor nasal Valsalva maneuver resulted in detectable nystagmus or vertigo. An ICS Impulse device (Otometrics, Natus Medical Inc, Denmark) was used to measure VOR-gain values for all six SCs on the same day. Gains were considered normal if >0.8 for horizontal SCs and >0.7 for vertical canals (29). vHIT highlighted left global canal deficit and slight right-sided posterior SC (PSC) hypofunction (Figure 1B). Bedside oculomotor testing excluded signs of impaired function of central vestibular pathways. Temporal bones CT scan showed soft tissue occupying the left EAC, mastoid, and tympanic cavities with bony erosion involving ossicular chain, HSC, fallopian canal, tympanic medial wall, and tegmen tympani (Figures 1C,D). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed contrast enhanced tissue invading the intracranial compartment through superior and posteromedial walls of the temporal bone (Figures 1E,F). Histologic examination of the polypoid tissue within the left EAC was consistent with squamous cell carcinoma. Diagnosis of T4-stage disease according to the modified Pittsburgh staging system (31) was made, and the patient was addressed to palliative radiation therapy.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Instrumental and radiological data of case one. (A) Audiometry showing mixed HL on the right side and profound HL on the left. (B) vHIT measurements. Blue lines represent head impulses exciting left SCs, orange lines correspond to impulses for right SCs, green lines represent eye movements induced by the activation of VOR following each impulse and red lines correspond to corrective saccades. Mean value of VOR-gain (eye velocity/head velocity) is reported for each SC. The hexagonal plot in the center of the figure summarizes mean VOR-gains for each SC; normal gains are shown in green and deficient gains are in red. A global canal hypofunction on the left and a slight reduction of the VOR-gain for contralateral PSC with overt saccades could be clearly observed. Axial (C) and coronal (D) images of temporal bones CT scans completed with axial T1-weighted (E) and coronal T2-weighted (F) gadolinium-enhanced brain MRI showing soft tissue density (yellow asterisks) within left external/middle-ear and mastoid cavity disrupting surrounding structures. Ossicular chain is not detectable. Bony erosion areas at the posterior fossa (white arrowheads) and middle fossa floor (yellow arrowheads) with dural infiltration are highlighted. Otic capsule erosion at the left HSC is indicated with red arrows. AC, air conduction; BC, bone conduction; CT, computed tomography; HL, hearing loss; HSC, horizontal semicircular canal; L, left; LA, left anterior; LL, left lateral; LP, left posterior; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PSC, posterior semicircular canal; R, right; RA, right anterior; RL, right lateral; RP, right posterior; SC, semicircular canal; vHIT, video-head impulse test; VOR, vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Patient 2

A 73-year-old woman referred to our center for a follow-up evaluation of right-sided canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomy due to a COM with cholesteatoma. The surgical procedure was conducted two years earlier without simultaneous functional stage. She experienced symptoms consistent with right-sided cochleo-vestibular loss following surgery. Pressure-induced unsteadiness and dizziness represented her prominent residual vestibular symptoms. Otoscopy highlighted dry right EAC and well-preserved postoperative conditions. Her audiogram showed right-sided mixed HL with widened air-bone gap at lower frequencies and contralateral age-related sensorineural HL (Figure 2A). Although spontaneous nystagmus could not be observed with video-Frenzel goggles, mastoid vibrations elicited left-beating nystagmus. Horizontal nystagmus directed toward the affected side was evoked applying positive pressure on her right EAC, reversing on removal of the pressure. Conversely, no nystagmus could be noticed with Valsalva maneuvers. Even though she denied positional vertigo, left-beating nystagmus could be observed on supine positioning and slightly persistent geotropic direction-changing nystagmus was elicited after head rolls, with stronger amplitude on right-sided positioning (Supplementary Video 2). vHIT measurements were taken on the same day, showing VOR-gain reduction for all SCs of the right side and mildly impaired function for left PSC (Figure 2B). High-resolution CT scan detected postoperative LF involving right HSC without inflammatory recurrences (Figures 2C–F). Although we proposed revision surgery for LF closure and hearing restoration, she refused additional procedures as audio-vestibular symptoms did not prevent her from leading a normal life.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Instrumental and radiological data of case two. (A) Audiometric test exhibiting mixed HL on the right with predominant ABG at lower frequencies and left high-frequency sensorineural HL consistent with patient's age. (B) vHIT showing reduced VOR-gain values for all right SCs with both overt and covert saccades and slight hypoactive VOR for contralateral PSC without corrective saccades. Axial (C,D) and coronal (E,F) images of temporal bone CT scans detecting signs of previous CWD mastoidectomy (white asterisks) with HSC fistula (white arrows). ABG, air-bone gap; AC, air conduction; BC, bone conduction; CWD, canal wall down; CT, computed tomography; HL, hearing loss; HSC, horizontal semicircular canal; L, left; LA, left anterior; LL, left lateral; LP, left posterior; PSC, posterior semicircular canal; R, right; RA, right anterior; RL, right lateral; RP, right posterior; SC, semicircular canal; vHIT, video head impulse test; VOR, vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Patient 3

A 46-year-old man with a history of left ear discharge presented with newly onset HL and vertigo. His medical history was otherwise silent besides head trauma (car accident) that occurred seven months prior to the admission with residual positional vertigo. He denied oscillopsia, pressure-induced vertigo, or other vestibular symptoms. The otoscopy revealed a left thickened tympanic membrane with EAC discharge. Audiometric testing showed down-sloping sensorineural HL on the right and left-sided mixed HL with predominant conductive loss for low frequencies (Figure 3A). Right-beating spontaneous nystagmus enhanced by mastoid vibrations consistent with left acute vestibular loss could be observed on video-Frenzel examination. Nystagmus reduced in backward head bending, while increased with downbeat components in forward head tilts. Left Dix-Hallpike maneuver elicited paroxysmal up-beating nystagmus with left torsional components consistent with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) involving left-sided PSC, so he received Epley's repositioning procedures (Supplementary Video 3). At the following examination 2 days later, positioning tests were uneventful, whereas right-beating spontaneous nystagmus enhanced by head shakings could be still detectable. Left tragal compression induced right-torsional nystagmus, followed by stronger opposite eye movements on release of the pressure (Supplementary Video 4), whereas both nasal and glottic Valsalva maneuvers were uneventful. The patient underwent vHIT measurements on the same day, showing left global hypofunction and slightly reduced VOR-gain for the right PSC (Figure 3B). Temporal bones CT scan revealed soft tissue consistent with cholesteatoma obliterating the right-sided tympano-mastoid cavity and eroding ossicular chain, all SCs, sigmoid sinus bony wall, and tegmen tympani (Figures 3C–H). Angio-MRI of the brain ruled out venous thrombosis and meningeal involvement (Figures 3I–K). He received CWD mastoidectomy that evidenced bony erosions of each SC and permitted achievement of cholesteatoma removal. A thin matrix layer was left upon each bony defect, whereas tegmen dehiscence was repaired with bone-pate. Additional procedures for hearing restoration and LF obliteration were postponed at a later stage. Postoperative care included bed rest, intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics, and corticosteroids tapering for additional two weeks. The patient's conditions progressively recovered and hearing threshold remained unchanged at 30 days. Spontaneous nystagmus was progressively reduced whereas vHIT findings and PIN aligning in the same axis persisted over time.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Instrumental and radiological data of case three. (A) Audiometric testing showing high-frequency sensorineural HL on the right side and left mixed HL with significant ABG widened for low frequencies and mild-to-moderate down-sloping sensorineural hearing impairment. (B) vHIT detecting reduced VOR-gain values for all left SCs with overt saccades and slight hypofunction for contralateral PSC with no corrective saccades. Axial (C–E) and coronal (F–H) temporal bones CT scans completed with axial (I) and coronal (J,K) T2-weighted gadolinium-enhanced brain MRI showing soft tissue density (yellow asterisks) within left middle-ear and mastoid cavity eroding ossicles and tegmen tympani (yellow arrowheads). Bony labyrinthine erosions of left SSC (red arrows), HSC (yellow arrows), and PSC (green arrows) are highlighted. ABG, air-bone gap; AC, air conduction; BC, bone conduction; CT, computed tomography; HL, hearing loss; HSC, horizontal semicircular canal; L, left; LA, left anterior; LL, left lateral; LP, left posterior; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PSC, posterior semicircular canal; R, right; RA, right anterior; RL, right lateral; RP, right posterior; SC, semicircular canal; SSC, superior semicircular canal; vHIT, video head impulse test; VOR, vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Written informed consent was obtained from each patient for the publication of this case report, including all data and images.

Discussion

Oval and round windows represent the only sites with reduced impedance in the inner ear, whereas the remaining membranous labyrinth is entirely encased within the otic capsule. Other anatomical openings connecting the inner ear fluid spaces to the surrounding structures, such as the cochlear and vestibular aqueducts, are functionally closed to sound and pressure flows as they usually offer high impedance (11). Additional bony openings such as a labyrinthine dehiscence can result in increased inner ear compliance leading to abnormal pressure transmission into the vestibular system from surrounding compartments (2). LF represents an interruption of the otic capsule connecting perilymphatic spaces with the middle ear. It may occur in <15% of patients affected by COM with cholesteatoma (13–19) or may represent a late complication in subjects being previously submitted to CWD mastoidectomy (32, 33). Affected sites can be identified in <60% of temporal bone CT scans of patients with intraoperative findings of LF (18, 19, 34) while MRI may provide additional information about inner ear involvement (35). Whereas HSC represents the most commonly affected site, both cholesteatoma matrix and inflammatory tissue may sometimes erode other structures as PSC, superior SC (SSC), vestibule, and cochlea (13–18). As LF may also represent a pathway for toxins and pathogens invasion from the middle ear to the membranous labyrinth accounting for serous or suppurative labyrinthitis, symptoms can include variable combinations of vertigo and HL depending on LF location, on the size of bony defects, and on the extent of inner ear damage (13–19, 36). PIN represents a peculiar finding in LF, although it may show a low diagnostic sensitivity. In fact, it might be underestimated due to a possible complete functional loss of inner ear sensors/afferents or the mass-induced canal plug exerted by concurrent middle ear pathologies might prevent pressure change transmissions to the endolymphatic spaces (16, 18, 19, 28, 37). Its pathomechanism is mainly attributed to the stimulation of SC ampulla, according to the site of erosion (14, 20–23, 26–28). On the other hand, HS has been also ascribed to a possible otolith activation in other inner ear disorders, including Meniere's disease, perilymphatic fistula and vestibular atelectasis. In fact, fibrous adhesions between the stapedial footplate and the saccular membranous labyrinth (vestibulofibrosis) either due to a collapse of the membranous labyrinth or due to a saccular distension on a hydropic basis have been hypothesized (4–7, 24, 25). Nevertheless, clinical observations with VEMPs testing in a patient with endolymphatic hydrops (27) and experimental studies on LF in animal models (20) reported the onset of nystagmus after pressure changes despite saccular areflexia and after removal of the otolith membranes, respectively.

All cases herein described presented at our attention with functional loss for all SCs on vHIT besides different degrees of sensorineural HL consistent with global cochleo-vestibular damage. This condition likely represented the result of either previous or current labyrinthitis due to LF, accounting for contralesional nystagmus after mastoid vibrations detected in the second patient and for paretic spontaneous nystagmus enhanced by head shakings in the third case. Conversely, slightly reduced VOR-gains for contralesional PSCs (functionally coupled with affected SSCs) may likely result from the severe functional impairment of injured SSCs, in accordance with studies on contralesional function following vestibular neuritis and vestibular deafferentation, where an involvement of both central compensation processes and peripheral impairment of the “push-pull” mechanism have been hypothesized (38–40). On the other hand, PSC was the only hypoactive canal in the contralateral ear in all cases and the expected corrective saccades after head impulses were lacking in most cases, raising the possibility that our findings might be due to artifacts. Nevertheless, most healthy PSCs exhibited highly reduced VOR-gain values compared to ipsilateral SCs also in larger cohorts with unilateral vestibular loss (41). Moreover, the functional impairment for the PSC of the unaffected ear in the first two cases might reflect the greater effect of aging on PSC VOR-gain compared to the other SCs (42).

Unfortunately, low-acceleration VOR for HSCs could not be assessed with caloric test in the patients of our report due to concurrent external/middle ear pathologies preventing water irrigations. Nevertheless, further HSC VOR responses to different velocity and acceleration ranges could have been provided by rotational testing, but a rotatory chair was not available in our departments. Also, otolith activity could not be measured, as bone-conduction could have been the only possible way to test cervical and ocular VEMPs bypassing middle ear barriers, but it was not available in our institutions. However, given cochlear and SCs impairment, it is reasonable to assume that macular hair cells were also damaged, in accordance with studies in serous labyrinthitis (43–45).

Nevertheless, PIN could still be elicited in all subjects, likewise positional nystagmus in two cases. These apparently incongruent findings might be explained assuming a functional dissociation between ampullary hair cells encoding angular accelerations. In particular, detectable PIN despite SCs impairment on vHIT might imply a spared activity for type II hair cells and regular canal afferents encoding cupular displacements which generates nystagmus (46–48). This hypothesis is supported by studies on animal models of canal dehiscence providing evidence that sound-evoked eye movements (comparable in principle to PIN) do not only arise from sustained sound-evoked activation of phase-locking irregularly-discharging canal afferents, but also to slowly developing but sustained excitation/inhibition of regularly discharging afferents (48–50). Our assumptions are also in line with data from human temporal bone surveys showing that vestibular degeneration following serous labyrinthitis starts from type I hair-cells (44, 45). Similarly, preserved caloric responses were found in clinical studies on patients with COM (43, 51), perilymphatic fistula (52) or in cases exhibiting HS despite otolith functional loss (27). Conversely, investigations with rotatory testing have mainly documented reduced vestibular responses for the affected ear (53–55), strengthening the hypothesis of a greater impaired function of hair cells encoding for higher range frequencies. On the other hand, it may be assumed that there is a different functional outcome for damaged ampullary hair cells/afferents following acute labyrinthitis, where a selective recovery of sensors encoding for low-velocity inputs was matched by deficient high-acceleration VOR responses at long-term evaluation (38, 56). Nevertheless, a possible role of the residual function of phasic afferents in the genesis of PIN could not be ruled out a priori as all patients herein described did not present with complete canal loss on vHIT. In fact, the amount of residual canal function that is actually needed to still generate a response is not yet fully understood. Moreover, it could not be excluded that the different maximal eye velocities observed during each single canal impulse in each subject could have affected evoked nystagmus amplitudes and the interpretation of eye movements during PIN (26).

Whereas in the first two subjects the easiest explanation for HS is represented by pressure-induced endolymphatic flows toward the ampulla of the involved HSC activating spared/recovered regular afferents (Figures 4A,B), simultaneous cupular deflection toward the utricle in all dehiscent SCs could likely account for contralesional torsional nystagmus resulting from left tragal compression in the latter case. In particular, while ipsilesional nystagmus resulting from excitatory pressure-induced input within left HSC was mitigated by underlying baseline spontaneous nystagmus beating in the opposite direction, opposed vertical components generated from simultaneous inhibiting flows within vertical SCs canceled each other. Hence, such a PIN vector (right-torsional nystagmus) could be likely derived from the sum of concurrent inhibitions of left-sided vertical SCs afferents (14, 26) (Figure 4C). In accordance with Ewald's laws, pressure removal from the affected ears elicited coplanar weaker opposite nystagmus due to inhibitory ampullofugal flows within HSC in the first two cases. Conversely, the same maneuver generated stronger ipsilesional torsional nystagmus as a result of overlapping excitatory ampullofugal inputs within the left vertical SCs in the latter case (30).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Schematic representation of the membranous labyrinth along the sagittal plane (above) to explain the proposed mechanism for pressure-induce eye movements (below) in each case. Positive pressure applied over the EAC is represented with black dashed arrows, resulting in endolymphatic flows with red arrows and direction of nystagmus fast phase with blue arrows. (A) In the first case, positive pressure applied on the left EAC resulted in ampullopetal endolymphatic flows within left dehiscent HSC, leading to transitory excitation (+ + +) of left HSC afferents. As there were no spontaneous nystagmus, resulting nystagmus was purely horizontal left-beating. (B) Likewise, in the second patient, right tragal compression led to ampullopetal excitatory (+ + +) endolymphatic flows within right HSC resulting in transient horizontal right-beating nystagmus. (C) In the third case, positive pressure exerted over the patient's left EAC generated simultaneous ampullopetal endolymphatic flows within each dehiscent canal, being excitatory (+ + +) for left HSC and inhibitory for left PSC and SSC (− − −). While horizontal left-beating components coming from left HSC activation opposed to ongoing spontaneous paretic nystagmus, vertical components generated by vertical canal inhibition (upbeat and downbeat for SSC and PSC, respectively) reciprocally canceled. Then, resulting nystagmus mainly reflected torsional rightbeating components coming from inhibition of left vertical canals afferents. EAC, external auditory canal; HSC, horizontal semicircular canal; L, left; PSC, posterior semicircular canal; R, right; SSC, superior semicircular canal.

The same reasoning could be applied in the interpretation of nystagmus behavior in the last patient during head movements along the pitch plane. In this case, vertical/torsional positional nystagmus due to simultaneous left-sided PSC BPPV evoked by head bending likely superimposed underlying baseline paretic spontaneous nystagmus (57). In the same patient, paroxysmal nystagmus could be elicited despite PSC VOR-gain loss on vHIT, strengthening the assumption of spared or recovered low-velocity afferents (58). Similarly, in the second case, positional geotropic direction-changing horizontal nystagmus closely matched with the expected oculomotor findings resulting from a buoyancy mechanism likely due to penetration of toxic agents and/or inflammatory mediators into the affected HSC (59–61). On the other hand, positional nystagmus has been reported in patients with labyrinthine-intracranial fistula. In fact, it has been hypothesized that intracranial pressure variations related to sudden changes in head positions could be conveyed into the dehiscent canal and result in excitatory/inhibitory endolymphatic flows accounting for direction-changing nystagmus (62–64). Similarly, head movements have been assumed to evoke subtle mass-induced pressure changes on the membranous labyrinth at the LF area in a patient with cholesteatoma eroding the HSC who presented with geotropic positional horizontal nystagmus (65). Nevertheless, the patient of the second case herein reported should not have developed similar mechanisms, as the LF was in contact neither with intracranial spaces nor with middle ear masses. Furthermore, an outward protrusion of the membranous duct through the right HSC fistula, that should be expected to occur in right-sided head positionings due to the gravity vector, should have resulted in ampullofugal flows, and in turn to apogeotropic nystagmus, which was not the case for our patient.

Although a reverse functional dissociation pattern impairing low-velocity while sparing high-velocity canal VOR has been often observed in several vestibular diseases (66–69), other vestibular pathologies have been related to a loss of sensitivity for high-acceleration head movements while low-acceleration behavior remains intact, likewise LF herein reported (70–72). In particular, SSC dehiscence represents another condition accounting for a third window mechanism that has been demonstrated to result in ocular movements aligning with the plane of the affected canal in response to loud sounds and/or pressure changes despite selectively impaired canal function on vHIT. However, in this condition, either a plug effect exerted by middle fossa structures on membranous labyrinth or dissipation of mechanical energy through the dehiscence have been assumed as underlying factors accounting for reduced high-velocity VOR-gain for the affected canal (73, 74). Whereas this latter mechanism could hypothetically account for the global canal hypofunction on vHIT in the last case with erosion of all the three SCs, it could neither explain the impaired responses in high-velocity domain for vertical canals detected in the first two cases with isolated HSC fistula, nor could it account for the concomitant sensorineural HL.

While both cases 2 and 3 presented with a widened low-frequency air-bone gap, as expected from a third mobile window pathology (11), several symptoms and signs pertaining to the third window spectrum could not be detected in our patients. Whereas the lack of pulsatile tinnitus, own body sounds hyperacusis and vertigo induced by loud sounds could be explained by the masking effect of the underlying middle ear disorders, nystagmus induced by Valsalva maneuvers could have been missing due to the different location of LF created by middle ear disease (as in our patients) compared to SSC dehiscence at the arcuate eminence. In fact, the lack of PIN in nasal Valsalva could likely be due to the fact that pressure transmission from the nasal cavity to the middle ear through the Eustachian tube was prevented by the coexistent middle ear pathologies. On the other hand, whereas glottic Valsalva maneuver should generate nystagmus through increased intracranial pressure conveyance to the labyrinthine spaces via SSC dehiscence (9), in no case herein described did LF expose the membranous labyrinth to intracranial cavity. Nevertheless, the lack of video-oculographic recording, providing an accurate detection of subtle eye movements to pressure/sounds and slow phase velocity measures, could have prevented detecting these signs in our study.

In general, the results of our study and literature data suggest that conclusions about SCs activity in the case of vestibular impairment only based on vHIT data could be misleading, as these measurements do not reflect the whole VOR response spectrum and dissociation among afferents encoding high and low-acceleration responses could be possible. In fact, as observed in our patients, HS could be elicited despite global canal hypofunction on vHIT, allowing clinicians to combine the analysis of PIN behavior and imaging to identify the location of LF prior to middle ear surgery (14). According to the same reasoning, vestibular hypofunction on vHIT should never authorize clinicians to neglect evaluating for provoked nystagmus in patients with vestibular symptoms, as residual/spared canal activity could account for ampullary activation to endolymphatic flows despite vHIT data.

Nevertheless, as already evidenced, the main limitation of this study, preventing any definite conclusion on the genesis of PIN in our patients, is the lack of objective measurements of both low-acceleration SCs VOR and otolith function. Despite the unlikelihood of a macular contribution to vestibular responses to pressure changes in the patients herein described, we could not exclude a possible activation of otolith receptors, as it has been described how these structures could modify ongoing ocular movements or generate spontaneous horizontal nystagmus (75, 76), and how they could be functionally spared in case of labyrinthitis with concurrent third window pathologies (77). Additionally, even though the presenting instrumental picture and PIN behavior in the patient with EAC tumor overlapped vestibular findings in the other two individuals with COM, we could not exclude that the two pathologies may result in different labyrinthine lesion patterns. Even though it has been reported how squamous cell carcinoma of the EAC could result in inner ear invasion through HSC erosions (78) and how middle ear tumors could lead to both labyrinthitis and labyrinthine ischemia (79, 80), inner ear histopathology in the case of temporal bone malignancy is still mostly unknown.

Conclusions

Although pathomechanisms underlying PIN in LF are still unclear, our case series showing that HS could be detectable even with hypoactive SCs on vHIT might offer additional insights to this aspect. Although vHIT measurements would suggest an impairment of canal function, SCs seem to represent the target sensor of HS in LF as nystagmus axis matched that of the affected canals and its characteristics strictly followed Ewald's laws. In our opinion, this apparently paradoxical finding might be possible through a functional dissociation between low- (active) and high- (impaired) velocity canal afferents. An asymmetrical damage or recovery among different subgroups of hair cells following labyrinthitis might represent the underlying process accounting for this functional behavior. Nevertheless, we strongly believe that further studies on PIN are required to substantiate the assumption that HS in LF results from the stimulation of type II hair-cells and regular afferents of dehiscent SCs.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Area Vasta Nord Emilia Romagna. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author Contributions

AC, PM, SM, and EA: conceptualization and data interpretation. AC, CB, PM, SM, FC, MF, and FL: investigation and original draft preparation. AC, CB, MB, IJF, PM, LR, and GB: data acquisition. AC: images and artwork. GB, EA, and AG: supervision and manuscript review. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.634782/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Video 1. Video Frenzel findings in patient 1.

Supplementary Video 2. Video Frenzel findings in patient 2.

Supplementary Video 3. Video Frenzel findings in patient 3 (first evaluation).

Supplementary Video 4. Video Frenzel findings in patient 3 (last evaluation).

Abbreviations

BPPV, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo; COM, chronic otitis media; CT, computed tomography; CWD, canal wall down; EAC, external auditory canal; HL, hearing loss; HSC, horizontal semicircular canal; LF, labyrinthine fistula; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PIN, pressure-induced nystagmus; PSC, posterior semicircular canal; SC, semicircular canal; SSC, superior semicircular canal; vHIT, video head impulse test; VOR, vestibulo-ocular reflex.

References

1. Hennebert C. A new syndrome in hereditary syphilis of the labyrinth. Presse Med Belg Brux. (1911) 63:467–70.

Google Scholar

2. Minor LB. Labyrinthine fistulae: pathobiology and management. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (2003) 11:340–6. doi: 10.1097/00020840-200310000-00006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Sarna B, Abouzari M, Merna C, Jamshidi S, Saber T, Djalilian HR. Perilymphatic fistula: a review of classification, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:1046. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.01046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Nadol JB Jr. Positive “fistula sign” with intact tympanic membrane. Arch Otolaryngol. (1974) 100:273–8. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1974.00780040283007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Nadol JB Jr. Positive Hennebert's sign in Ménière's disease. Arch Otolaryngol. (1977) 103:524–30. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1977.00780260054005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Wenzel A, Ward BK, Schubert MC, Kheradmand A, Zee DS, Mantokoudis G, et al. Patients with vestibular loss, Tullio phenomenon, and pressure-induced nystagmus: vestibular atelectasis? Otol Neurotol. (2014) 35:866–72. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000366

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Maslovara S, Butkovic-Soldo S, Pajic-Matic I, Sestak A. Vestibular atelectasis: decoding pressure and sound-induced nystagmus with bilateral vestibulopathy. Laryngoscope. (2019) 129:1685–88. doi: 10.1002/lary.27724

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Gadre AK, Edwards IR, Baker VM, Roof CR. Membranous or hypermobile stapes footplate: a new anatomic site resulting in third window syndrome. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:871. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00871

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Minor LB, Solomon D, Zinreich JS, Zee DS. Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (1998) 124:249–58. doi: 10.1001/archotol.124.3.249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Lee JA, Liu YF, Nguyen SA, McRackan TR, Meyer TA, Rizk HG. Posterior semicircular canal dehiscence: case series and systematic review. Otol Neurotol. (2020) 41:511–21. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002576

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ. Conductive hearing loss caused by third-window lesions of the inner ear. Otol Neurotol. (2008) 29:282–9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318161ab24

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Wackym PA, Balaban CD, Zhang P, Siker DA, Hundal JS. Third window syndrome: surgical management of cochlea-facial nerve dehiscence. Front Neurol. (2019) 10:1281. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01281

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Sheehy JL, Brackmann DE. Cholesteatoma surgery: management of the labyrinthine fistula–a report of 97 cases. Laryngoscope. (1979) 89:78–87. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197901000-00008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. McCabe BF. Labyrinthine fistula in chronic mastoiditis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. (1984) 112:138–41. doi: 10.1177/00034894840930S424

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Sanna M, Zini C, Bacciu S, Scandellari R, Delogu P, Jemmi G. Management of the labyrinthine fistula in cholesteatoma surgery. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. (1984) 46:165–72. doi: 10.1159/000275704

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Dornhoffer JL, Milewski C. Management of the open labyrinth. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (1995) 112:410–4. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(95)70275-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Jang CH, Merchant SN. Histopathology of labyrinthine fistulae in chronic otitis media with clinical implications. Am J Otol. (1997) 18:15–25.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

18. Busaba NY. Clinical presentation and management of labyrinthine fistula caused by chronic otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. (1999) 108:435–9. doi: 10.1177/000348949910800503

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Kvestad E, Kvaerner KJ, Mair IW. Labyrinthine fistula detection: the predictive value of vestibular symptoms and computerized tomography. Acta Otolaryngol. (2001) 121:622–6. doi: 10.1080/000164801316878935

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Nylen CO. A clinical study of the labyrinthine fistula symptoms and pseudo-fistula symptoms in otitis. Acta Otolaryngol. (1923) 5(Suppl 3):7–511.

21. Dohlman G. The mechanism of the fistula test. Acta Otolaryngol. (1953) 43(Suppl 109):22–6. doi: 10.3109/00016485309132494

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Pursiainen KE. VI. Fistula Tests. Acta Otolaryngol. (1954) 43(Suppl 112):44–74. doi: 10.3109/00016485409122089

CrossRef Full Text

23. Zwergius E. The mechanism of labyrinthine fistular reactions; experimental investigations. Acta Otolaryngol. (1956) 46:74–9. doi: 10.3109/00016485609118171

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Ostrowski VB, Hain TC, Wiet RJ. Pressure-induced ocular torsion. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (1997) 123:646–9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900060098017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Backous DD, Minor LB, Aboujaoude ES, Nager GT. Relationship of the utriculus and sacculus to the stapes footplate: anatomic implications for sound- and/or pressure-induced otolith activation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. (1999) 108:548–53. doi: 10.1177/000348949910800604

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Yagi T, Kamura E, Shitara A. Three-dimensional analysis of pressure nystagmus in labyrinthine fistulae. Acta Otolaryngol. (1999) 119:150–3. doi: 10.1080/00016489950181558

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Suzuki M, Kitajima N, Ushio M, Shintani M, Ishibashi T. Changes in the Tullio phenomenon and the fistula sign in the course of endolymphatic hydrops. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. (2003) 65:125–8. doi: 10.1159/000070778

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Helmchen C, Gehrking E, Gottschalk S, Rambold H. Persistence of perilymph fistula mechanism in a completely paretic posterior semicircular canal. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2005) 76:280–2. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.038083

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Halmagyi GM, Chen L, MacDougall HG, Weber KP, Mc Garvie LA, Curthoys IS. The video head impulse test. Front Neurol. (2017) 8:258. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00258

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Ewald JR. Physiologische Untersuchungen ueber das Endorgan des Nervus Octavus. Wiesbaden: Bergmann (1892).

Google Scholar

31. Moody SA, Hirsch BE, Myers EN. Squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal: an evaluation of a staging system. Am J Otol. (2000) 21:582–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

32. Hakuba N, Hato N, Shinomori Y, Sato H, Gyo K. Labyrinthine fistula as a late complication of middle ear surgery using the canal wall down technique. Otol Neurotol. (2002) 23:832–5. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200211000-00003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Portmann D, Rezende Ferreira D. Delayed labyrinthine fistula in canal wall down mastoidectomy. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). (2003) 124:265–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

34. Fuse T, Tada Y, Aoyagi M, Sugai Y. CT detection of facial canal dehiscence and semicircular canal fistula: comparison with surgical findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. (1996) 20:221–4. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199603000-00009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Sone M, Mizuno T, Sugiura M, Naganawa S, Nakashima T. Three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging investigation of inner ear disturbances in cases of middle ear cholesteatoma with labyrinthine fistula. Otol Neurotol. (2007) 28:1029–33. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181587d95

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Paparella MM, Brady DR, Hoel R. Sensori-neural hearing loss in chronic otitis media and mastoiditis. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. (1970) 74:108–15.

Google Scholar

37. D'Albora R, Silveira L, Carmona S, Perez-Fernandez N. Diagnostic bedside vestibuloocular reflex evaluation in the setting of a false negative fistula test in cholesteatoma of the middle ear. Case Rep Otolaryngol. (2017) 2017:2919463. doi: 10.1155/2017/2919463

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS, Cremer PD, Henderson CJ, Todd MJ, Staples MJ. The human horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex in response to high-acceleration stimulation before and after unilateral vestibular neurectomy. Exp Brain Res. (1990) 81:479–90. doi: 10.1007/BF02423496

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Aw ST, Fetter M, Cremer PD, Karlberg M, Halmagyi GM. Individual semicircular canal function in superior and inferior vestibular neuritis. Neurology. (2001) 57:768–74. doi: 10.1212/WNL.57.5.768

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Palla A, Straumann D. Recovery of the high-acceleration vestibulo-ocular reflex after vestibular neuritis. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. (2004) 5:427–35. doi: 10.1007/s10162-004-4035-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Allum JHJ, Honegger F. Improvement of asymmetric vestibulo-ocular reflex responses following onset of vestibular neuritis is similar across canal planes. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:565125. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.565125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. McGarvie LA, MacDougall HG, Halmagyi GM, Burgess AM, Weber KP, Curthoys IS. The Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) of semicircular canal function - age-dependent normative values of VOR gain in healthy subjects. Front Neurol. (2015) 6:154. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00154

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Chang CW, Cheng PW, Young YH. Inner ear deficits after chronic otitis media. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. (2014) 271:2165–70. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2714-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. da Costa Monsanto R, Erdil M, Pauna HF, Kwon G, Schachern PA, Tsuprun V, et al. Pathologic changes of the peripheral vestibular system secondary to chronic otitis media. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (2016) 155:494–500. doi: 10.1177/0194599816646359

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Kaya S, Schachern PA, Tsuprun V, Paparella MM, Cureoglu S. Deterioration of vestibular cells in labyrinthitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. (2017) 126:89–95. doi: 10.1177/0003489416675356

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Goldberg JM, Fernandez C. Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating semicircular canals of the squirrel monkey. I. Resting discharge and response to constant angular accelerations. J Neurophysiol. (1971) 34:635–60. doi: 10.1152/jn.1971.34.4.635

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Sadeghi SG, Chacron MJ, Taylor MC, Cullen KE. Neural variability, detection thresholds, and information transmission in the vestibular system. J Neurosci. (2007) 27:771–81. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4690-06.2007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Rabbitt RD. Semicircular canal biomechanics in health and disease. J Neurophysiol. (2019) 121:732–55. doi: 10.1152/jn.00708.2018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Carey JP, Hirvonen TP, Hullar TE, Minor LB. Acoustic responses of vestibular afferents in a model of superior canal dehiscence. Otol Neurotol. (2004) 25:345–52. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200405000-00024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Iversen MM, Zhu H, Zhou W, Della Santina CC, Carey JP, Rabbitt RD. Sound abnormally stimulates the vestibular system in canal dehiscence syndrome by generating pathological fluid-mechanical waves. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:10257. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28592-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Lee IS, Park HJ, Shin JE, Jeong YS, Kwak HB, Lee YJ. Results of air caloric and other vestibular tests in patients with chronic otitis media. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. (2009) 2:145–50. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2009.2.3.145

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Young Y H, Nomura Y, Hara M. Vestibular pathophysiologic changes in experimental perilymphatic fistula. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. (1992) 101:612–6. doi: 10.1177/000348949210100713

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Bhansali SA, Cass SP, Benitez JT, Mathog RH. Vestibular effects of chronic perilymph fistula in the cat. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (1990) 102:701–8. doi: 10.1177/019459989010200613

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Gianoli GJ, Soileau JS. Chronic suppurative otitis media, caloric testing, and rotational chair testing. Otol Neurotol. (2008) 29:13–5. doi: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31815c2589

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Mostafa BE, Shafik AG, El Makhzangy AM, Taha H, Abdel Mageed HM. Evaluation of vestibular function in patients with chronic suppurative otitis media. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. (2013) 75:357–60. doi: 10.1159/000357475

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Schmid-Priscoveanu A, Bohmer A, Obzina H, Straumann D. Caloric and search-coil head-impulse testing in patients after vestibular neuritis. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. (2001) 2:72–8. doi: 10.1007/s101620010060

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Choi S, Choi HR, Nahm H, Han K, Shin JE, Kim CH. Utility of the bow and lean test in predicting subtype of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Laryngoscope. (2018) 128:2600–4. doi: 10.1002/lary.27142

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Casani AP, Cerchiai N, Navari E. Paroxysmal positional vertigo despite complete vestibular impairment: the role of instrumental assessment. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. (2018) 38:563–8. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1549

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Kim CH, Choi JM, Jung HV, Park HJ, Shin JE. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss with simultaneous positional vertigo showing persistent geotropic direction-changing positional nystagmus. Otol Neurotol. (2014) 35:1626–32. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000457

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Kim CH, Yang YS, Im D, Shin JE. Nystagmus in patients with unilateral acute otitis media complicated by serous labyrinthitis. Acta Otolaryngol. (2016) 136:559–63. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2015.1132845

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Choi JW, Han K, Nahm H, Shin JE, Kim CH. Direction-changing positional nystagmus in acute otitis media complicated by serous labyrinthitis: new insights into positional nystagmus. Otol Neurotol. (2019) 40:e393–e8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Brantberg K, Bergenius J, Mendel L, Witt H, Tribukait A, Ygge J. Symptoms, findings and treatment in patients with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Acta Otolaryngol. (2001) 121:68–75. doi: 10.1080/000164801300006308

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Suzuki M, Ota Y, Tanaka T, Ota Y. Lateral semicircular canal-enlarged vestibular aqueduct fistula associated with paroxysmal positional nystagmus. Otol Neurotol. (2016) 37:e192–3. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000778

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Young AS, McMonagle B, Pohl DV, Magnussen J, Welgampola MS. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting with recurrent positional vertigo. Neurology. (2019) 93:1070–2. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008624

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Shim DB, Ko KM, Song MH, Song CE. A case of labyrinthine fistula by cholesteatoma mimicking lateral canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Korean J Audiol. (2014) 18:153–7. doi: 10.7874/kja.2014.18.3.153

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Mahringer A, Rambold HA. Caloric test and video-head-impulse: a study of vertigo/dizziness patients in a community hospital. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. (2014) 271:463–72. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2376-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Bartolomeo M, Biboulet R, Pierre G, Mondain M, Uziel A, Venail F. Value of the video head impulse test in assessing vestibular deficits following vestibular neuritis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. (2014) 271:681–8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2451-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Blödow A, Blödow J, Bloching MB, Helbig R, Walther LE. Horizontal VOR function shows frequency dynamics in vestibular schwannoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. (2015) 272:2143–8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3042-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. McGarvie LA, Curthoys IS, MacDougall HG, Halmagyi GM. What does the head impulse test versus caloric dissociation reveal about vestibular dysfunction in Meniere's disease? Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2015) 1343:58–62. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12687

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Prepageran N, Kisilevsky V, Tomlinson D, Ranalli P, Rutka J. Symptomatic high frequency/acceleration vestibular loss: consideration of a new clinical syndrome of vestibular dysfunction. Acta Otolaryngol. (2005) 125:48–54. doi: 10.1080/00016480410017981

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Kirchner H, Kremmyda O, Hüfner K, Stephan T, Zingler V, Brandt T, et al. Clinical, electrophysiological, and MRI findings in patients with cerebellar ataxia and a bilaterally pathological head-impulse test. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2011) 1233:127–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06175.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Castellucci A, Malara P, Martellucci S, Botti C, Delmonte S, Quaglieri S, et al. Feasibility of using the video-head impulse test to detect the involved canal in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo presenting with positional downbeat nystagmus. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:578588. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.578588

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Cremer PD, Minor LB, Carey JP, Della Santina CC. Eye movements in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome align with the abnormal canal. Neurology. (2000) 55:1833–41. doi: 10.1212/WNL.55.12.1833

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Castellucci A, Piras G, Del Vecchio V, Crocetta FM, Maiolo V, Ferri GG, et al. The effect of superior canal dehiscence size and location on audiometric measurements, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials and video-head impulse testing. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. (2020). doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06169-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Fluur E, Siegborn J. The otolith organs and the nystagmus problem. Acta Otolaryngol. (1973) 76:438–42. doi: 10.3109/00016487309121533

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Manzari L, MacDougall HG, Burgess AM, Curthoys IS. Selective otolith dysfunctions objectively verified. J Vestib Res. (2014) 24:365–73. doi: 10.3233/VES-140537

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Castellucci A, Botti C, Renna L, Delmonte S, Moratti C, Pascarella R, et al. Enhanced otolith function despite severe labyrinthine damage in a case of pneumolabyrinth and pneumocephalus due to otogenic meningitis associated with superior canal dehiscence. Otol Neurotol. (2021) 42:e101–6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002835

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Ungar OJ, Santos F, Nadol JB, Horowitz G, Fliss DM, Faquin WC, et al. Invasion patterns of external auditory canal squamous cell carcinoma: a histopathology study. Laryngoscope. (2021) 131:e590–7. doi: 10.1002/lary.28676

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Hiraide F, Inouye T, Ishii T. Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the middle ear invading the cochlea. A histopathological case report. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. (1983) 92(3 Pt 1):290–4. doi: 10.1177/000348948309200315

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Ogino S, Iino Y, Nakamoto Y, Murakami Y, Toriyama M. Histopathological study of the temporal bones in patients with primary carcinomas of the ear. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. (2000) 103:1141–9. doi: 10.3950/jibiinkoka.103.1141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar