Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Nephrol., 11 September 2024
Sec. Glomerular disease
This article is part of the Research Topic IgA Nephropathy: a Nephrologist’s Challenge in 2023 View all 5 articles

Editorial: IgA nephropathy: a nephrologist’s challenge in 2023

  • 1Nephrology, Dialysis and Hypertension Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • 2Berkshire Kidney Unit, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, United Kingdom
  • 3Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, ASST Lariana, San Fermo della Battaglia, Italy

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerulonephritis in young people worldwide. It is characterized by mesangial deposition of immune-complexes containing galactose-deficient-IgA1 and associated autoantibodies; thus, it is now considered an autoimmune disease. The prevalence of IgAN is higher in Asian compared to European and sub-Saharan African populations, due to genetic and environmental factors and to the differences in the frequency of urine screening and threshold for performing kidney biopsy, the gold standard for the diagnosis. IgAN accounts for approximately 40% of all native biopsies in Japan, 25% in Europe, 12% in USA, and <5% in Central Africa (1).

Although slowly, end-stage kidney disease occurs in 25%–50% of patients within 10–20 years of presentation (24). Thus, many young patients will start dialysis in their lifetime, even when treated with currently available therapy (4). In older patients, IgAN can increase cardiovascular risk and anticipate initiation of dialysis (5). Broadening the criteria for kidney biopsy would allow earlier diagnosis and treatment, possibly improving this outcome. The Oxford Classification has shown the prognostic importance of histological lesions, and a recent Chinese study assumes that the intensity of glomerular macrophage invasion can predict the response to immune-suppressive therapy (6). Thus, repeat biopsies may become important if increased disease activity is clinically suspected.

Hypertension and proteinuria are independent risk factors for disease progression in IgAN (3, 7). Current and main therapeutic goals are proteinuria <1 g/day, better if <0.5 g/day (8, 9), it is then reasonable to assume that reducing proteinuria as low and as early as possible is worthwhile; and blood pressure <120/80 mmHg, as Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend (10).

Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) or Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are the first choice at maximum tolerated doses, irrespective of hypertension (10). Lifestyle changes, in particular dietary sodium restriction, weight control, and aerobic exercise, are essential parts of IgAN treatment (10). Thus, encouraging the patient to adopt a healthy lifestyle becomes part of the management as well as its active participation in treatment decisions.

This Research Topic arises from the ferment in IgAN research. Advances in the understanding of pathogenesis (GWAS studies), disease assessment, and international collaboration have led to new medications approved by FDA and EMA, providing hope that future treatment options will become increasingly precise and personalized.

According to the “four-hit hypothesis,” elevated circulating IgA1 levels that lack galactose residues (Gd-IgA1) (hit 1), in susceptible individuals, trigger autoantibody production (hit 2) that causes formation (hit 3) and deposition of immune-complexes in the mesangium, triggering the complement cascade, cellular proliferation, and cytokine and chemokine release and leading to kidney injury in IgAN (hit 4) (11). In a review by Cheung et al., the pivotal roles of BAFF (B-cell-activating factor of the TNF family) and APRIL (A proliferation-inducing ligand) in IgAN pathogenesis were explored, in particular in their interplay between mucosal hyper-responsiveness (Human gut-associated lymphoid tissues (GALT) and nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT)) and B-cell activation with overproduction of Gd-IgA1 and its autoantibodies. Preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate the relationship between high levels of both mediators and IgA levels. As BAFF is primarily involved in the survival and maturation of B cells (12) and APRIL in the later stages of B-cell differentiation (13), their single or dual inhibition is to be considered as a therapeutic strategy. Sibeprenlimab, an anti-APRIL-humanized antibody (14), telitacicept and atacicept, two novel agents that target both BAFF and APRIL tested in Chinese IgAN patients (15, 16), have shown promising results.

In their original research, Fu et al., through a two-sample Mendelian randomization, observed a causal relationship between elevated cathepsin S (CTSS) levels and increased risk of developing IgAN. Cathepsins are a class of enzymes regulating protein trafficking and secretion in the proteolytic events of many kidney and autoimmune diseases (1721). As they also found higher serum CTSS and higher CTSS expression in tubulo-interstitium of IgAN patients compared to controls and other primary glomerulonephritis, they hypothesized that CTSS could influence immune-mediated processes and metabolic pathways in IgAN. They also observed that CTSS expression positively correlate with monocytes and T cells gamma delta infiltration in IgAN renal tissues. Thus, they suggested that CTSS could be an exciting drug target for IgAN treatment.

Noor et al. presented an overview of available and eligible drugs for IgAN. They discussed two new drugs approved by FDA: TRF-budesonide and sparsentan. TRF-budesonide acts on Peyer’s patches, the primary site for IgA production, and minimizes systemic exposure to steroids. In the NefIgArd trial, patients treated with maximum Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition and targeted-release formulation (TRF)-budesonide for 9 months had a 48% reduction in UPCR (22) and eGFR over 2 years was higher in TRF-budesonide compared to placebo, even after 15 months of drug discontinuation (23). Sparsentan, an oral dual endothelin and angiotensin II-receptor antagonist, has been approved for high-risk IgAN patients. In the PROTECT trial, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) was reduced by 49.8% in the sparsentan group compared with the irbesartan group at 36 weeks (24). Keeping in mind the side effects of steroids, in IgAN patients at high risk of progression (higher proteinuria, eGFR loss, and MEST-C score), low-dose steroids, as in the TESTING 2.0 trial, should be considered, whereas clinical trial enrollment is desirable. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have been approved for chronic kidney disease; through the reduction of intraglomerular pressure by tubulo-glomerular feedback, they have proven to be effective in reducing UPCR by 26% in IgAN (25) and slowing the rate of progression of chronic kidney disease in all patients, including those with low-grade albuminuria (26). There are ongoing studies on other endothelin-receptor antagonists and non-steroidal anti-aldosteron antagonists, alone or in combination with i-SGLT-2.

Yoshimura et al. presented a 51-year-old male patient affected by alcoholic liver cirrhosis (ALC) with renal impairment (serum creatinine: 2 mg/dL) and nephrotic syndrome (UPCR 4.3 g/gCr) due to biopsy-proven IgAN. Dapagliflozin (10 mg/day) was initiated, and surprisingly, after 1 week of treatment, UPCR was markedly reduced to <1 g/gCr and hematuria disappeared. The authors assumed a potential efficacy of iSGLT-2 for renal protection in IgAN-ALC. Since in DAPA-CKD and EMPA-KIDNEY nephrotic syndrome was only slightly represented, caution is needed to use SGLT-2 inhibitors in these patients.

We thank the contributing authors for demonstrating interest in this Research Topic and for sharing their research, while waiting for the results of ongoing trials and the new KDIGO guidelines for IgA nephropathy.

Author contributions

FC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. OF: Writing – review & editing. LV: Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Woo KT, Chan CM, Chin YM, Choong HL, Tan HK, Foo M, et al. Global evolutionary trend of the prevalence of primary glomerulonephritis over the past three decades. Nephron Clin Pract. (2010) 116:c337–46. doi: 10.1159/000319594

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Jarrick S, Lundberg S, Welander A, Carrero JJ, Höijer J, Bottai M, et al. Mortality in IgA nephropathy: A nationwide population-based cohort study. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2019) 30:866–76. doi: 10.1681/asn.2018101017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Berthoux F, Mohey H, Laurent B, Mariat C, Afiani A, Thibaudin L. Predicting the risk for dialysis or death in IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2011) 22:752. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010040355

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Pitcher D, Braddon F, Hendry B, Mercer A, Osmaston K, Saleem MA, et al. Long-term outcomes in IgA nephropathy. Clin J. (2023) 18:727–38. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000135

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Barbour SJ, Reich JN. Risk stratification of patients with IgA nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis. (2012) 59:865–73. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.02.326

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Xie D, Zhao H, Xu X, Zhou Z, Su C, Jia N, et al. Intensity of macrophage infiltration in glomeruli predicts response to immunosuppressive therapy in patients with igA nephropathy. JASN. (2021) 32:3187–96. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021060815

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Reich HN, Troyanov S, Scholey JW, Cattran DC, Toronto Glomerulonephritis Registry. Remission of proteinuria improves prognosis in IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2007) 18:3177. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007050526

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Le W, Liang S, Hu Y, Deng K, Bao H, Zeng C, et al. Long-term renal survival and related risk factors in patients with IgA nephropathy: results from a cohort of 1155 cases in a Chinese adult population. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2012) 27:1479–85. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr527

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Inker LA, Mondal H, Greene T, Masaschi T, Locatelli F, Schena FP, et al. Early change in urine protein as a surrogate end point in studies of IgA nephropathy: an individual patient meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. (2016) 68:392–401. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.02.042

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerular Diseases Work Group. KDIGO 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of glomerular diseases. Kidney Int. (2021) 100:S1–S276. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Suzuki H, Kiryluk K, Novak J, Moldovoeany Z, Herr A, Renfrow MB, et al. The pathophysiology of IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2011) 22:1795–803. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011050464

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Mackay F, Schneider P. Cracking the BAFF code. Nat Rev Immunol. (2009) 9:491–502. doi: 10.1038/nri257212

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Benson MJ, Dillon SR, Castigli E, Geha RS, Xu S, Lam KP, et al. Cutting edge: the dependence of plasma cells and independence of memory B cells on BAFF and APRIL. J Immunol. (2008) 180:3655–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.6.3655

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Mathur M, Barratt J, Chacko B, Chan TM, Kooienga L, Oh LH, et al. A phase 2 trial of sibeprenlimab in patients with igA nephropathy. N Engl J Med. (2024) 390:20–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2305635

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Lv J, Liu L, Hao C, Li G, Fu P, Xing G, et al. Randomized phase 2 trial of telitacicept in patients with IgA nephropathy with persistent proteinuria. Kidney Int Rep. (2022) 8:499–506. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.12.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Lafayette R, Maes B, Lin C, Barbour S, Phoon R, Kim SG, et al. 3848 ORIGIN trial: 24-wk primary analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ph2b study of atacicept in patients with IgAN. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2023) 38:gfad063a. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfad063a_3848

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Wang Y, Xi W, Zhang X, Bi X, Liu B, Zheng X, et al. CTSB promotes sepsisinduced acute kidney injury through activating mitochondrial apoptosis pathway. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1053754 7. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.10537547

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Suzuki C, Tanida I, Ohmuraya M, Oliva Trejo JA, Kakuta S, Sunabori T, et al. Lack of cathepsin D in the renal proximal tubular cells resulted in increased sensitivity against renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:1711. doi: 10.3390/ijms20071711

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Hamm-Alvarez SF, Janga SR, Edman MC, Madrigal S, Shah M, Frousiakis SE, et al. Tear cathepsin S as a candidate biomarker for Sjögren’s syndrome. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2014) 66:1872–81. doi: 10.1002/art.3863335

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Kawato Y, Fukahori H, Nakamura K, Kanno A, Kubo K, Hiramitsu M, et al. Potential benefit of the cathepsin S inhibitor, ASP1617, as a treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus. Eur J Pharmacol. (2022) 919:174826. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.174826

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Behl T, Chadha S, Sehgal A, Singh S, Sharma N, Kaur R, et al. Exploring the role of cathepsin in rheumatoid arthritis. Saudi J Biol Sci. (2022) 29:402–10. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.09.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Barratt J, Lafayette R, Rovin B, Stone A, Cattran D, Floege J, et al. Results from part a of the multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled NefIgArd trial, which evaluated targeted-release formulation of budesonide for the treatment of primary immunoglobulin a nephropathy. Kidney Int. (2023) 103:391–402. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.09.017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Fellström BC, Barratt J, Cook H, Coppo R, Feehally J, de Fijter JW, et al. Targeted-release budesonide versus placebo in patients with IgA nephropathy (NEFIGAN): a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet. (2017) 389:2117–27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00569-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Heerspink HJL, Radhakrishnan J, Perkovic VPROTECT Investigators. Sparsentan in patients with IgA nephropathy: a prespecified interim analysis from a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial. Lancet. (2023) 401:1584–94. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00569-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Wheeler DC, Toto RD. DAPA-CKD trial committees and investigators. a prespecified analysis of the DAPA-CKD trial demonstrates the effects of dapagliflozin on major adverse kidney events in patients with IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int. (2021) 100:215–24. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.03.033

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Staplin N, Haynes R, Judge PK, Wanner C, Green JB, Emberson J, et al. Effects of empaglifozin on progression of chronic kidney disease: a prespecified secondary analysis from empa-kidney trial. Lancet Diabtes Endocrinol. (2024) 12:39–50. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00033-0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: IgA nephropathy, treatment, pathogenesis, cathepsin S (Cat S), BAFF - B-cell activating factor, APRIL (TNFSF13), biomarker, SGLT 2 inhibitor

Citation: Catapano F, Flossmann O and Del Vecchio L (2024) Editorial: IgA nephropathy: a nephrologist’s challenge in 2023. Front. Nephrol. 4:1477350. doi: 10.3389/fneph.2024.1477350

Received: 07 August 2024; Accepted: 15 August 2024;
Published: 11 September 2024.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Duvuru Geetha, Johns Hopkins Medicine, United States

Copyright © 2024 Catapano, Flossmann and Del Vecchio. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Fausta Catapano, ZmF1c3RhLmNhdGFwYW5vQGFvc3AuYm8uaXQ=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.