Karen L. Elliott
Bernd Fritzsch
Jeremy S. Duncan- 1Department of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
- 2Department of Biological Sciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, United States
We review the evolution and development of organ of Corti hair cells with a focus on their molecular differences from vestibular hair cells. Such information is needed to therapeutically guide organ of Corti hair cell development in flat epithelia and generate the correct arrangement of different hair cell types, orientation of stereocilia, and the delayed loss of the kinocilium that are all essential for hearing, while avoiding driving hair cells toward a vestibular fate. Highlighting the differences from vestibular organs and defining what is known about the regulation of these differences will help focus future research directions toward successful restoration of an organ of Corti following long-term hair cell loss.
Introduction
All vertebrate hair cells (HCs) have stereocilia organized in a staircase pattern, displaying distinct apical polarities for stimuli to open mechanoelectrical transduction channels (METs) permitting endolymphatic potassium to enter the HCs and change their resting potential (Hudspeth, 2005; Reichenbach and Hudspeth, 2014). All vertebrates have vestibular-like HCs (vHCs) in ears (Lewis et al., 1985; Desai et al., 2005) and, if present, in lateral line mechanosensors (Fritzsch and López-Schier, 2014; Chagnaud et al., 2017; Nicolson, 2017). However, only mammals possess specialized HCs within mammalian-specific organ of Corti (OC) that differ from vHCs (Fritzsch et al., 2013; Manley, 2017). This distinctiveness is most obvious in their stereocilia organization and the absence of kinocilia (Schwander et al., 2010; Fritzsch and Elliott, 2017). There is also a profound difference in the radial distribution of HCs and supporting cells in the OC (Held, 1902; Jahan et al., 2015a) that is unlike the checkerboard distribution of HCs and supporting cells in the vestibular organs (Desai et al., 2005; Jahan et al., 2015a; Burns and Stone, 2017). In addition to HC morphology and distribution differences, there is a unique innervation by afferent (Rubel and Fritzsch, 2002; Dabdoub et al., 2016) and efferent neurons (Simmons et al., 2011; Sienknecht et al., 2014; Maison et al., 2016) and unique OHC contractility (Okoruwa et al., 2008; He et al., 2014).
Both vHCs and OC-HCs die over time, leading to late onset vestibular and hearing dysfunction (Rauch et al., 2001; Fattal et al., 2018). One approach to combat age-related HC loss is to generate new HCs in their place. Non-mammalian vertebrates are able to regenerate HCs throughout life, and this is also possible for vestibular organs of mice (Bucks et al., 2017). In contrast, mammalian OC-HCs are unable to regenerate beyond an early age (White et al., 2006), even if additional molecular measures convert remaining supporting cells into HC-like cells (McLean et al., 2016; Walters et al., 2017). The reasons for the inability of OC-HCs to regenerate may be related, in part, to the unique cellular structure of the OC, the unique organization of stereocilia on the apical surface of OC-HCs, and the late embryonic/neonatal loss of the kinocilium.
Thus far, all attempts to generate HCs in the dish have resulted in only the formation of vHCs (Liu et al., 2016; Koehler et al., 2017), that are unlikely to function in the OC. While some direct conversions have resulted in OC-like HC types, most attempts generated abnormal HCs that either could not function or have limited viability (Yang et al., 2012; Walters et al., 2017). This review provides an overview of our current understanding of specific aspects of OC-HC versus vHC morphological and molecular development. We evaluate available developmental and evolutionary data to better molecularly understand the necessary steps that can transform vHCs into those of the OC (Figure 1) and transform a vestibular organ with unsymmetrically distributed HC types into a precisely organized OC with two distinctly distributed types of structurally and functional unique OC-HCs (Jahan et al., 2015a).
FIGURE 1. Molecular and morphological differences between vestibular and cochlear hair cells. (A) Type I and type II vestibular hair cells, arranged in a checkerboard pattern with supporting cells, form opposing polarities in the saccule at a line of polarity reversal (dotted line, center). (B) The organ of Corti evolved out of an outgrowth of the saccule into the lagenar duct and requires expression of several genes to form organ of Corti-specific hair cell subtypes and distribution. (C) The organ of Corti has a unique organization of hair cells and supporting cells to form one row of inner hair cells and three rows of outer hair cells separated by two rows of supporting cells (inner and outer pillar cells). Following a downward deflection of the reticular lamina (RL) by 2 nm at 70 dB sound pressure level (SPL; more at higher sound intensities), endolymph from the inner spiral sulcus flows over the stereocilia of inner hair cells (blue arrows) and into the subtectorial space that is in addition modified by the prestin mediated outer hair cell contractility to amplify local movements. (D) We hypothesize that recapitulation of the genes involved in the evolution and development of the organ of Corti might be needed to transform the flat epithelium, consisting of BMP4 positive outer sulcus (Claudius) cells, following hair cell loss to restore the organ of Corti. (E) Substitution of an inner hair cell by a vestibular type hair cell would alter the fluid flow mechanics. Instead of the endolymph primarily moving over the top of stereocilia, it would move around the vestibular stereocilia bundle, causing little movement of stereocilia. In addition, stereocilia movement is reduced by the kinocilium being embedded in the tectorial membrane. This kinocilia in the tectorial membrane would also affect the vibration of the tectorial membrane relative to the basilar membrane. Thickness of blue arrows denotes relative fluid flow.
Molecular Developmental Evolutionary Considerations
In the vestibular organs, the sensory epithelia are mostly organized as a repeating mosaic of supporting cells and HCs. In contrast, the OC contains several types of highly specialized supporting cells and the HCs are organized in a very stereotyped single row of inner hair cells (IHC) and 3 rows of outer hair cells (OHC) surrounded by variable numbers of supporting cells (Lim, 1986) (Figure 1). It has been hypothesized that during evolution, new sensory epithelia evolved by the expansion and subsequent partitioning of preexisting epithelia during development (Duncan and Fritzsch, 2012a; Mann et al., 2017). This also most likely occurred in the formation of the OC by an expansion of the saccular sensory epithelia into the lagenar recess that eventually developed into the cochlea (Fritzsch et al., 2013; Basch et al., 2016). As stated above, the attempts to regenerate HCs results in the formation of vestibular like HCs, perhaps due to the OC’s evolutionary vestibular past (Yang et al., 2012). Deciphering developmental genetic differences between the vestibular epithelia and the OC amounts to understanding the changes in gene regulatory networks that originally drove the evolution of the OC. This information will not only advance the understanding of how a novel sensory modality evolved, but will benefit hearing restoration by regenerating auditory HCs instead of driving cells toward a vestibular fate (Jahan et al., 2018).
Unlike vestibular epithelia, the OC grows through extension into the elongating cochlear duct (Burns et al., 2012; Driver et al., 2017). This growth due to the precise regulation of proliferation, convergent extension, and differentiation results in the unique cellular arrangement of the OC. We have just begun to understand how this can be interpreted as the evolution of transcription factors (for example: Foxg1, Lmx1a, N-Myc, and Neurod1) that expand the OC driving its growth from the ductus reuniens toward the apical end (Montcouquiol et al., 2003; Fritzsch et al., 2013; Driver et al., 2017). Mutations of these genes result in a shortened OC that has multiple rows of both IHCs and OHCs, may show unusual distribution of OC-HC (Neurod1), or develops OC-vHC mixes (Lmx1a). Thus, the extension of the cochlear duct and with it, the convergent extension of the OC precursor cells, must promote the formation of the four rows of HCs. The loss of Foxg1 results in 16 or more rows of HCs within this shortened OC (Pauley et al., 2006), more extensive compared to loss of Neurog1 (Ma et al., 2000). These cochleae resemble monotreme mammals that naturally have multiple rows of HCs in the apex of a shortened cochlear duct (Ladhams and Pickles, 1996; Fritzsch et al., 2013). It is thus conceivable that studying the development of the monotreme OC would reveal the factors necessary for convergent extension (Montcouquiol et al., 2003) and rearrangement of multiple rows of HCs into four rows; with Foxg1 being likely involved. How the differential control of proliferation and differentiation affects convergent extension processes that are involved in the outgrowth of the OC by intercalation of precursor cells is not fully known (Driver et al., 2017).
Unlike the vestibular system, the IHCs and OHCs of the OC are segregated (Figure 1). While the comingling of type I and type II HCs within the vestibular epithelia does not compromise their function, the segregation of IHCs and OHCs is crucial for OC functionality. The OHC cells provide signal amplification (He et al., 2014; Xia et al., 2018) via the tectorial membrane (Russell et al., 2007; Dewey et al., 2018) creating a differential flow of fluid exciting the IHCs. This function requires at a minimum that IHCs lose their kinocilia in order for their stereocilia to move freely from the inner spiral sulcus to the subtectorial space, and back (Figure 1C). To achieve this, IHCs have thick stereocilia and are immediately adjacent to each other to maximally obstruct the fluid flow from the sub-tectorial space to the inner spiral sulcus (Richter et al., 2007) (Figure 1C). Since the reticular lamina is only displaced by approximately 2 nm at 70 dB sound pressure level (Ren et al., 2016), it is essential to have this maximal obstruction of fluid flow so that limited movements of endolymph at the tallest stereocilia causes enough displacement to stimulate IHCs (Hudspeth, 2005; Reichenbach and Hudspeth, 2014). Embedding a kinocilium into the overlying tectorial membrane and reshaping IHC stereocilia like vHC bundles would hamper this IHC function (Figure 1E). In contrast, presence of a kinocilium and embedding it into the tectorial membrane is fully compatible with basilar papilla mediated sound sensing in other vertebrates (Manley, 2017). Beyond morphological descriptions of the loss of kinocilia (Kimura et al., 1964; Lindeman et al., 1971) nothing is known about the molecular cues underlying this delayed loss with retention of the basal body that appears unique to OC HCs. A possibility would be co-opting tubulin disassembly mechanisms from cell division to rapidly disassemble the kinocilia.
These physiological and phylogenetic considerations suggest that OC-HC development and evolution was a stepwise transformation: this achieved the right diameter of stereocilia with the right number and overall organization in the right cell type in conjunction with the prestin mediated OC amplifier (Okoruwa et al., 2008). It also ensured the delayed loss of the kinocilium that is initially necessary for orientation of the HC and its ability to detect diffusible signals such as Shh (Corbit et al., 2005; Bok et al., 2013; Sienknecht et al., 2014). Indeed, the natural late loss of the primary cilium (aka kinocilium) in OC-HCs does not result in aberrant development that occurs when most epithelial cells lose their kinocilium. However, when certain kinocilia proteins are mutated (Jones et al., 2008) or there is a developmental reduction of kinocilia (Delmaghani et al., 2016) there is an effect on the normal development of cochlear HCs, indicating that the kinocilia is necessary early in development and its loss is also crucial for HC function in the OC. Minimally we need to understand this process to the extent that we can form a kinocilia to generate OC-HCs, but then force the loss of the kinocilium in order for HCs to properly function within the OC. It stands to reason that both of these process are embedded downstream of several unique transcription factors (Figure 1) that either selectively affect HCs of the OC if mutated such as Gata3 (Karis et al., 2001; Duncan and Fritzsch, 2013), Pax2 (Torres et al., 1996; Bouchard et al., 2010) or transform part of the OC into a vestibular HC carrying organ such as Lmx1a (Nichols et al., 2008).
Differences Between Vestibular and Cochlear Stereocilia and Their Mechanotransduction Channels
The mammalian mechanosensory channel is in part formed by the transmembrane proteins Tmc1/2 (Pan et al., 2013). Knocking out Tmc1 or 2 differentially affects vHCs and OC-HCs. This may be related to differences in the spatiotemporal expression profile of these proteins between the vestibular and cochlear systems (Imtiaz et al., 2016; Shibata et al., 2016). While Tmc1 null mice are deaf as adults, vestibular function is not impaired. In contrast, Tmc2 null mice have normal hearing and vestibular function. Tmc2 is postnatally downregulated in OC-HCs, whereas vHCs retain Tmc2, suggesting Tmc2 can compensate for loss of Tmc1 in vHCs whereas there is a specific requirement of OC-HCs for Tmc1 (Kawashima et al., 2015). Even more profound are differences between vHCs and OC-HCs regarding the likely MET associated protein, CIB2 (Giese et al., 2017; Vélez-Ortega and Frolenkov, 2017; Vélez-Ortega et al., 2017). While Cib2 null mice progressively lose OC-HCs, there is no change in vHCs. Moreover, HC loss starts in the IHCs, progressing from base to apex, much like in Cdc42 mutants that affect the actin assembly in the stereocilia (Ueyama et al., 2014). Furthermore, OC-HCs are more susceptible to degeneration after embryonic ablation of afferents whereas vHCs are more robust (Kersigo and Fritzsch, 2015), suggesting that differences in physiological properties include differential sensitivity to various components of the mechanotransduction system. While our understanding of the relative necessity of parts of the mechanosensory channel between the vHCs and OC-HCs is greatly increasing, there is a lack of understanding of both why these differences are necessary for specialization of these different HCs and the gene regulatory networks that drive these differences during development (Booth et al., 2018; Ellwanger et al., 2018).
Differential effects of stereocilia homeostasis extend beyond induced cell death after mutations of Cdc42 (Ueyama et al., 2014) and also include differential effects of stereocilia length after mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor pathway substrate 8 [Eps8 (Tavazzani et al., 2016)]: Such mutants are deaf but show no obvious vestibular phenotype, reinforcing the perception of differences between OC-HCs and vHCs. In part, these differences are related to the presence of kinocilia in vHCs that allow mechanical stimuli to be transmitted to the shorter stereocilia, implying that in the vestibular system, kinocilia are part of the mechanotransduction apparatus allowing the tallest stereocilia to participate in mechanotransduction. Furthermore, vHCs have a normal MET current in these mutants, which is substantially altered in OC-HCs (Tavazzani et al., 2016). Moreover, the much-shortened IHC stereocilia essentially disable the function of these HCs as hydrodynamic sensors that monitor fluid flow between the subtectorial space (between the tectorial membrane and the reticular lamina) and the inner spiral sulcus (Figure 1). These data on stereocilia geometry on hearing (Tavazzani et al., 2016) add to the complexity of the cellular assembly of the OC (Jahan et al., 2015a) and its emerging regulation by changes such as replacing Atoh1 by Neurog1 (Jahan et al., 2015b), changing timing of cell cycle exit and Atoh1 regulation (Kopecky et al., 2013) or altering a range of diffusible factors that cooperate with delta-notch signaling to fine tune that pattern (Groves and Fekete, 2012, 2017; Munnamalai and Fekete, 2016).
Planar Cell Polarity in Inner Ear Neurosensory Development
All HCs, no matter their sub-type, initiate their development with the kinocilium in the center of their apical surface surrounded by microvilli. As development progresses, this kinocilium translocates toward one side of the HC and the microvilli specialize as stereocilia (Figure 2A). As they specialize, the stereocilia closest to the kinocilium end up being the tallest while those further away are shorter, resulting in a staircase pattern. This directionality toward one side of the cell gives the HC an orientation, known as polarity (Hudspeth, 2005). Comparative analyses show that the developmental progression of HC polarization resembles that of the evolution from single-celled ancestor of all metazoans to vertebrate mechanosensory cells. In fact, it has been suggested that transformation of the concentric arrangement of apical structures of the choanoflagellate to a more polarized distribution like that of the vertebrate HC is mediated by genes involved in polarity and HC development (Duncan and Fritzsch, 2012a; Fritzsch and Elliott, 2017). This polarization is coordinated, resulting in all HCs of a particular region to be oriented in the same direction. Across most vertebrate taxa, the orientation pattern of the utricle is conserved (Lewis et al., 1985) with two regions of HCs with opposing orientation patterns, abutting at the line of polarity reversal. In contrast, the saccule has 2–6 regions with distinct orientation patterns depending on the species (Lewis et al., 1985; Ladich and Schulz-Mirbach, 2016). In species with two orientation patterns, the two regions of HCs are oriented away from each other. Both the utricle and saccule polarity patterns are substantially different from the mammalian OC where all HCs are oriented with their tallest stereocilia located abneurally. A single polarity for all vHCs is also found in canal cristae but polarity of horizontal crista is different from that of posterior and anterior canal crista (Lewis et al., 1985) possibly due to their late addition (Maklad et al., 2010). The OC-HC single orientation is especially striking as the OC evolved as an outgrowth of the saccule (Duncan and Fritzsch, 2012b). Whether the OC is only the outgrowth of a small region of the saccule with a single orientation or evolved from an intermediate form that contained two orientations of HCs remains unknown but has important ramifications in replacement of cochlear HCs with uniform polarity. The necessity of this information in regeneration is highlighted by the fact that the proper orientation of cochlear HCs is necessary for their function, and when experimentally inducing HCs in the greater epithelial ridge, these HCs lack coordinated orientation (Kelly et al., 2012). Below we provide some insights into these processes.
FIGURE 2. Asymmetries in Inner ear development. (A) Development of stereocilia and kinocilia asymmetric localization on the apical portion of hair cells. The top row is a side view while the bottom row is a top down view of hair cell kinocilia in red and microvillistereocilia in green. As development progresses, the kinocilium migrates into an off-center position devoid of microvilli. The microvilli trailing the kinocilium grow in length and thickness and eventually develop into stereocilia. As the kinocilium reaches its asymmetric position, the stereocilia have formed their typical staircase arrangement whereas microvilli have disappeared. Differential development generates four general types of hair cells with distinctive stereocilia diameter and distribution. In the organ of Corti, hair cells eventually lose their kinocilia. The side view shows a Type I vestibular hair cell and a cochlear outer hair cell. (B) The distribution of PCP proteins in Drosophila, vestibular hair cells, and cochlear hair cells and resulting orientations of hair bristle/stereocilia (black). In the fly and in vestibular hair cells, Prickle (Prickle 2) and Van Gogh reside on one side of the cell, Frizzled and Disheveled on the other and Flamingo/Celsr1 is distributed on both sides of the cell. In vestibular hair cells, while the distribution of PCP proteins remains constant, stereocilia orient in opposing polarities at the line of polarity reversal. In cochlear hair cells, Frizzled3/6 and Celsr1 are expressed on one side, opposite the stereocilia. Data on mutations in PCP genes in the vertebrate suggest that the loss of individual PCP proteins differentially affects hair cells within an epithelium and hair cells between epithelia. (C) In Prickle1 mutants, there is an overlap of branches of apical afferents (blue arrow) with basal afferents (red arrow), in contrast to the maintenance of tonotopic projections in wild type mice. Based on this phenotype, we hypothesize that for spiral ganglion afferent segregation the diffusible Wnts factors released from the dorsal hindbrain (gray gradient) play a role. Abbreviations: HC, hair cell; IHC, Inner hair cell; OHC, outer hair cell; Vangl1/2, Van Gogh-like 1/2; Lp, Looptail.
Planar cell polarity (PCP) mechanisms control the development of polarity in individual cells and coordinate the alignment of neighboring cells across epithelia. Mutations in PCP proteins do not affect all HCs equally. For example, in the absence of Vangl2 it is primarily the third row of OHCs that display orientation defects while the other rows appear more normal (Figure 2B). Similarly, in the utricle only the HCs of the striola are affected whereas the rest of the epithelia remain close to normal (Yin et al., 2012). Interestingly, where the utricle and cochleae are different is when these mice are allowed to develop further. In this circumstance, many of these orientation defects within the cochlea are refined closer to a normal orientation, whereas the orientation defects within the vestibular utricle remain (Copley et al., 2013). Loss of only Vangl1 does not seem to have any effect on OC HCs (Song et al., 2010). However, the Vangl2 looptail mutation has been shown to also restrict the function of Vangl1 and is a severe mutation that results in the misorientation of all four rows of HCs in the OC (Montcouquiol et al., 2003; Yin et al., 2012) (Figure 2B). Like Vangl2, loss of Celsr1 seems to also only affect the 3rd row of outer HCs within the OC and the striola of the utricle (Duncan et al., 2017). Another family of PCP proteins within the OC is Fzd3/6. A double mutation in both Fzd3 and Fzd6 results in a phenotype that is in stark contrast with Vangl2 or Celsr1. In the Fzd3/6 mutant, the inner row of HCs has a severe defect in orientation whereas the third rows are less affected (Wang et al., 2006). These data on canonical PCP proteins is consistent with the mutation of Wnt5a, a ligand of Fzd receptors (Sienknecht et al., 2014). In Wnt5a mutants, HCs show altered orientations (Qian et al., 2007), and several mouse mutants possess sensory epithelia that remained fused and display intermediate PCP orientations (Duncan and Fritzsch, 2012b). Another PCP protein, Prickle 2, affects only the utricle (Deans et al., 2007).
The various subtypes of inner ear HCs are connected to cochlear and vestibular nuclei through cochlear and vestibular afferents, respectively (Rubel and Fritzsch, 2002; Dabdoub et al., 2016) (Figure 2C), and correct navigation to cochlear nuclei can occur even in the absence of central targets (Elliott et al., 2017). Transplantation studies (Elliott et al., 2013, 2015) suggest that inner ear afferents navigate to the correct dorsoventral column in the hindbrain using diffusible molecular cues from the hindbrain (Fritzsch and Elliott, 2017). Since it is thought that HCs and their associated neurons arose from a single neurosensory cell through gene duplication and differential association (Duncan and Fritzsch, 2012a; Fritzsch and Elliott, 2017), it is not surprising that PCP proteins have been shown to play a role in afferent navigation (Tao et al., 2012; Okerlund et al., 2016) in addition to their role in HC polarity. Interestingly, mice mutant for the PCP protein, Prickle 1, had no effect on OC-HC polarity, but rather on spiral ganglion afferent pathfinding (Yang et al., 2017). These mice displayed an overlap of apical afferents with basal afferents within cochlear nuclei (Figure 2C) (Yang et al., 2017). Given the role of several other PCP proteins in axon guidance in other neuronal systems (Zou, 2004; Hua et al., 2014; Qu et al., 2014; Chai et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2017), it is likely that additional PCP proteins play also a role in inner ear afferent navigation.
In summary, mammalian inner ears contain several HC subtypes that vary in their morphology and organization within and between different sensory epithelia and species. Current attempts to generate new HCs have thus far yielded only vHC types; however, these vHCs will not function in the OC due to presence of kinocilia and stereocilia organization and will thus not be able to restore their lost hearing at the needed sensitivity. Understanding the differential molecular evolution and development leading to HC heterogeneity may lend insights into the unique processes that result in the formation of the correct HC subtype in the right position with the proper polarity essential for function, including connection of HCs to their central targets by afferents.
Author Contributions
KE contributed to the conceptualization, wrote part of the paper, contributed to Figures 1, 2 and edited all of the text and figures. BF contributed to the conceptualization, wrote the introduction and contributed to Figure 1. JD conceptualized the paper, wrote the body of the paper and developed Figure 2.
Funding
This work was supported by NIDCD (RO1 DC005590 to BF and R03 DC015333 to KE), and funds from WMU Office of the Dean for the College of Arts and Sciences to JD.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The reviewer JM and the handling Editor declared their shared affiliation.
References
Basch, M. L., Brown, R. M., Jen, H. I., and Groves, A. K. (2016). Where hearing starts: the development of the mammalian cochlea. J. Anat. 228, 233–254. doi: 10.1111/joa.12314
Bok, J., Zenczak, C., Hwang, C. H., and Wu, D. K. (2013). Auditory ganglion source of Sonic hedgehog regulates timing of cell cycle exit and differentiation of mammalian cochlear hair cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 13869–13874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222341110
Booth, K. T., Azaiez, H., Jahan, I., Smith, R. J., and Fritzsch, B. (2018). Intracellular regulome variability along the organ of Corti: evidence, approaches, challenges, and perspective. Front. Genet. 9:156. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00156
Bouchard, M., de Caprona, D., Busslinger, M., Xu, P., and Fritzsch, B. (2010). Pax2 and Pax8 cooperate in mouse inner ear morphogenesis and innervation. BMC Dev. Biol. 10:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-10-89
Bucks, S. A., Cox, B. C., Vlosich, B. A., Manning, J. P., Nguyen, T. B., and Stone, J. S. (2017). Supporting cells remove and replace sensory receptor hair cells in a balance organ of adult mice. eLife 6:e18128. doi: 10.7554/eLife.18128
Burns, J. C., On, D., Baker, W., Collado, M. S., and Corwin, J. T. (2012). Over half the hair cells in the mouse utricle first appear after birth, with significant numbers originating from early postnatal mitotic production in peripheral and striolar growth zones. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 13, 609–627. doi: 10.1007/s10162-012-0337-0
Burns, J. C., and Stone, J. S. (2017). Development and Regeneration of Vestibular Hair Cells in Mammals, Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. New York, NY: Elsevier, 96–105.
Chagnaud, B. P., Engelmann, J., Fritzsch, B., Glover, J. C., and Straka, H. (2017). Sensing external and self-motion with hair cells: a comparison of the lateral line and vestibular systems from a developmental and evolutionary perspective. Brain Behav. Evol. 90, 98–116. doi: 10.1159/000456646
Chai, G., Goffinet, A. M., and Tissir, F. (2015). Celsr3 and Fzd3 in axon guidance. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 64, 11–14. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2015.03.013
Copley, C. O., Duncan, J. S., Liu, C., Cheng, H., and Deans, M. R. (2013). Postnatal refinement of auditory hair cell planar polarity deficits occurs in the absence of Vangl2. J. Neurosci. 33, 14001–14016. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1307-13.2013
Corbit, K. C., Aanstad, P., Singla, V., Norman, A. R., Stainier, D. Y. R., and Reiter, J. F. (2005). Vertebrate Smoothened functions at the primary cilium. Nature 437, 1018–1021. doi: 10.1038/nature04117
Dabdoub, A., Fritzsch, B., Popper, A. N., and Fay, R. R. (2016). The Primary Auditory Neurons of the Mammalian Cochlea. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3031-9
Deans, M. R., Antic, D., Suyama, K., Scott, M. P., Axelrod, J. D., and Goodrich, L. V. (2007). Asymmetric distribution of prickle-like 2 reveals an early underlying polarization of vestibular sensory epithelia in the inner ear. J. Neurosci. 27, 3139–3147. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5151-06.2007
Delmaghani, S., Aghaie, A., Bouyacoub, Y., El Hachmi, H., Bonnet, C., Riahi, Z., et al. (2016). Mutations in CDC14A, encoding a protein phosphatase involved in hair cell ciliogenesis, cause autosomal-recessive severe to profound deafness. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 98, 1266–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.04.015
Desai, S. S., Zeh, C., and Lysakowski, A. (2005). Comparative morphology of rodent vestibular periphery. I. Saccular and utricular maculae. J. Neurophysiol. 93, 251–266. doi: 10.1152/jn.00746.2003
Dewey, J. B., Xia, A., Muller, U., Belyantseva, I. A., Applegate, B. E., and Oghalai, J. S. (2018). Mammalian auditory hair cell bundle stiffness affects frequency tuning by increasing coupling along the length of the cochlea. Cell Rep. 23, 2915–2927. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.024
Driver, E. C., Northrop, A., and Kelley, M. W. (2017). Cell migration, intercalation and growth regulate mammalian cochlear extension. Development 144, 3766–3776. doi: 10.1242/dev.151761
Duncan, J. S., and Fritzsch, B. (2012a). Evolution of sound and balance perception: innovations that aggregate single hair cells into the ear and transform a gravistatic sensor into the organ of Corti. Anat. Rec. 295, 1760–1774. doi: 10.1002/ar.22573
Duncan, J. S., and Fritzsch, B. (2012b). Transforming the vestibular system one molecule at a time: the molecular and developmental basis of vertebrate auditory evolution. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 739, 173–186. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1704-0_11
Duncan, J. S., and Fritzsch, B. (2013). Continued expression of GATA3 is necessary for cochlear neurosensory development. PLoS One 8:e62046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062046
Duncan, J. S., Stoller, M. L., Francl, A. F., Tissir, F., Devenport, D., and Deans, M. R. (2017). Celsr1 coordinates the planar polarity of vestibular hair cells during inner ear development. Dev. Biol. 423, 126–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.01.020
Elliott, K. L., Houston, D. W., and Fritzsch, B. (2013). Transplantation of Xenopus laevis tissues to determine the ability of motor neurons to acquire a novel target. PLoS One 8:e55541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055541
Elliott, K. L., Houston, D. W., and Fritzsch, B. (2015). Sensory afferent segregation in three-eared frogs resemble the dominance columns observed in three-eyed frogs. Sci. Rep. 5:8338. doi: 10.1038/srep08338
Elliott, K. L., Kersigo, J., Pan, N., Jahan, I., and Fritzsch, B. (2017). Spiral ganglion neuron projection development to the hindbrain in mice lacking peripheral and/or central target differentiation. Front. Neural Circuits 11:25. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2017.00025
Ellwanger, D. C., Scheibinger, M., Dumont, R. A., Barr-Gillespie, P. G., and Heller, S. (2018). Transcriptional dynamics of hair-bundle morphogenesis revealed with celltrails. Cell Rep. 23, 2901–2914.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.002
Fattal, D., Hansen, M. R., and Fritzsch, B. (2018). “Age related balance impairment and hearing loss,” in The Wiley Handbook on the Aging Mind and Brain, eds M. Rizzo, S. Anderson, and B. Fritzsch (Chichester: Wiley), 848.
Fritzsch, B., and Elliott, K. L. (2017). Gene, cell, and organ multiplication drives inner ear evolution. Dev. Biol. 431, 3–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.08.034
Fritzsch, B., and López-Schier, H. (2014). “Evolution of polarized hair cells in aquatic vertebrates and their connection to directionally sensitive neurons,” in Flow Sensing in Air and Water, eds H. Bleckmann, J. Mogdans, and S. L. Coombs (Berlin: Springer), 271–294.
Fritzsch, B., Pan, N., Jahan, I., Duncan, J. S., Kopecky, B. J., Elliott, K. L., et al. (2013). Evolution and development of the tetrapod auditory system: an organ of Corti-centric perspective. Evol. Dev. 15, 63–79. doi: 10.1111/ede.12015
Giese, A. P., Tang, T. Q., Sinha, G. P., Bowl, M. R., Goldring, A. C., Parker, A., et al. (2017). CIB2 interacts with TMC1 and TMC2 and is essential for mechanotransduction in auditory hair cells. Nat. Commun. 8:43. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00061-1
Groves, A. K., and Fekete, D. M. (2012). Shaping sound in space: the regulation of inner ear patterning. Development 139, 245–257. doi: 10.1242/dev.067074
Groves, A. K., and Fekete, D. M. (2017). New Directions in Cochlear Development, Understanding the Cochlea. Berlin: Springer, 33–73. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-52073-5_3
He, D. Z., Lovas, S., Ai, Y., Li, Y., and Beisel, K. W. (2014). Prestin at year 14: progress and prospect. Hear. Res. 311, 25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.12.002
Held, H. (1902). Untersuchungen über den Feineren Bau des Ohrlabyrinthes der Wirbeltier. Berlin: BG Teubner.
Hua, Z. L., Chang, H., Wang, Y., Smallwood, P. M., and Nathans, J. (2014). Partial interchangeability of Fz3 and Fz6 in tissue polarity signaling for epithelial orientation and axon growth and guidance. Development 141, 3944–3954. doi: 10.1242/dev.110189
Hudspeth, A. (2005). How the ear’s works work: mechanoelectrical transduction and amplification by hair cells. C. R. Biol. 328, 155–162. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2004.12.003
Imtiaz, A., Maqsood, A., Rehman, A. U., Morell, R. J., Holt, J. R., Friedman, T. B., et al. (2016). Recessive mutations of TMC1 associated with moderate to severe hearing loss. Neurogenetics 17, 115–123. doi: 10.1007/s10048-016-0477-1
Jahan, I., Elliott, K. L., and Fritzsch, B. (2018). Understanding molecular evolution and development of the organ of Corti can provide clues for hearing restoration. Integr. Comp. Biol. doi: 10.1093/icb/icy019 [Epub ahead of print].
Jahan, I., Pan, N., Elliott, K. L., and Fritzsch, B. (2015a). The quest for restoring hearing: understanding ear development more completely. Bioessays 37, 1016–1027. doi: 10.1002/bies.201500044
Jahan, I., Pan, N., Kersigo, J., and Fritzsch, B. (2015b). Neurog1 can partially substitute for Atoh1 function in hair cell differentiation and maintenance during organ of Corti development. Development 142, 2810–2821. doi: 10.1242/dev.123091
Jones, C., Roper, V. C., Foucher, I., Qian, D., Banizs, B., Petit, C., et al. (2008). Ciliary proteins link basal body polarization to planar cell polarity regulation. Nat. Genet. 40, 69–77. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.54
Karis, A., Pata, I., van Doorninck, J. H., Grosveld, F., de Zeeuw, C. I., de Caprona, D., et al. (2001). Transcription factor GATA-3 alters pathway selection of olivocochlear neurons and affects morphogenesis of the ear. J. Comp. Neurol. 429, 615–630. doi: 10.1002/1096-9861(20010122)429:4<615::AID-CNE8>3.0.CO;2-F
Kawashima, Y., Kurima, K., Pan, B., Griffith, A. J., and Holt, J. R. (2015). Transmembrane channel-like (TMC) genes are required for auditory and vestibular mechanosensation. Pflügers Arch. 467, 85–94. doi: 10.1007/s00424-014-1582-3
Kelly, M. C., Chang, Q., Pan, A., Lin, X., and Chen, P. (2012). Atoh1 directs the formation of sensory mosaics and induces cell proliferation in the postnatal mammalian cochlea in vivo. J. Neurosci. 32, 6699–6710. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5420-11.2012
Kersigo, J., and Fritzsch, B. (2015). Inner ear hair cells deteriorate in mice engineered to have no or diminished innervation. Front. Aging. Neurosci. 7:33. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00033
Kimura, R. S., Schuknecht, H. F., and Sando, I. (1964). Fine morphology of the sensory cells in the organ of Corti of man. Acta Otolaryngol. 58, 390–408. doi: 10.3109/00016486409121399
Koehler, K. R., Nie, J., Longworth-Mills, E., Liu, X.-P., Lee, J., Holt, J. R., et al. (2017). Generation of inner ear organoids containing functional hair cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 583–589. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3840
Kopecky, B. J., Jahan, I., and Fritzsch, B. (2013). Correct timing of proliferation and differentiation is necessary for normal inner ear development and auditory hair cell viability. Dev. Dyn. 242, 132–147. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.23910
Ladhams, A., and Pickles, J. O. (1996). Morphology of the monotreme organ of Corti and macula lagena. J. Comp. Neurol. 366, 335–347. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960304)366:2<335::AID-CNE11>3.0.CO;2-O
Ladich, F., and Schulz-Mirbach, T. (2016). Diversity in fish auditory systems: one of the riddles of sensory biology. Front. Ecol. Evol. 4:28. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2016.00028
Lewis, E. R., Leverenz, E. L., and Bialek, W. S. (1985). The Vertebrate Inner Ear. Boca Raton, FA: CRC Press.
Lim, D. J. (1986). Functional structure of the organ of Corti: a review. Hear. Res. 22, 117–146. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90089-4
Lindeman, H., Ades, H., Bredberg, G., and Engström, H. (1971). The sensory hairs and the tectorial membrane in the development of the cat’s organ of Corti: a scanning electron microscopic study. Acta Otolaryngol. 72, 229–242. doi: 10.3109/00016487109122478
Liu, X.-P., Koehler, K. R., Mikosz, A. M., Hashino, E., and Holt, J. R. (2016). Functional development of mechanosensitive hair cells in stem cell-derived organoids parallels native vestibular hair cells. Nat. Commun. 7:11508. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11508
Ma, Q., Anderson, D. J., and Fritzsch, B. (2000). Neurogenin 1 null mutant ears develop fewer, morphologically normal hair cells in smaller sensory epithelia devoid of innervation. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 1, 129–143. doi: 10.1007/s101620010017
Maison, S., Liberman, L. D., and Liberman, M. C. (2016). Type II cochlear ganglion neurons do not drive the olivocochlear reflex: re-examination of the cochlear phenotype in peripherin knock-out mice. eNeuro 3, ENEURO.0207-16.2016. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0207-16.2016
Maklad, A., Kamel, S., Wong, E., and Fritzsch, B. (2010). Development and organization of polarity-specific segregation of primary vestibular afferent fibers in mice. Cell Tissue Res. 340, 303–321. doi: 10.1007/s00441-010-0944-1
Manley, G. A. (2017). “The cochlea: what it is, where it came from, and what is special about it,” in Understanding the Cochlea. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, Vol. 62, eds G. Manley, A. Gummer, A. Popper, and R. Fay (Cham: Springer), 17–32.
Mann, Z. F., Gálvez, H., Pedreno, D., Chen, Z., Chrysostomou, E., żak, M., et al. (2017). Shaping of inner ear sensory organs through antagonistic interactions between Notch signalling and Lmx1a. eLife 6:e33323. doi: 10.7554/eLife.33323
McLean, W. J., McLean, D. T., Eatock, R. A., and Edge, A. S. (2016). Distinct capacity for differentiation to inner ear cell types by progenitor cells of the cochlea and vestibular organs. Development 143, 4381–4393. doi: 10.1242/dev.139840
Montcouquiol, M., Rachel, R. A., Lanford, P. J., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., and Kelley, M. W. (2003). Identification of Vangl2 and Scrb1 as planar polarity genes in mammals. Nature 423, 173–177. doi: 10.1038/nature01618
Munnamalai, V., and Fekete, D. M. (2016). Notch-Wnt-Bmp crosstalk regulates radial patterning in the mouse cochlea in a spatiotemporal manner. Development 143, 4003–4015. doi: 10.1242/dev.139469
Nichols, D. H., Pauley, S., Jahan, I., Beisel, K. W., Millen, K. J., and Fritzsch, B. (2008). Lmx1a is required for segregation of sensory epithelia and normal ear histogenesis and morphogenesis. Cell Tissue Res. 334, 339–358. doi: 10.1007/s00441-008-0709-2
Nicolson, T. (2017). The genetics of hair-cell function in zebrafish. J. Neurogenet. 31, 102–112. doi: 10.1080/01677063.2017.1342246
Okerlund, N. D., Stanley, R. E., and Cheyette, B. N. (2016). The planar cell polarity transmembrane protein Vangl2 promotes dendrite, spine and glutamatergic synapse formation in the mammalian forebrain. Mol. Neuropsychiatry 2, 107–114. doi: 10.1159/000446778
Okoruwa, O. E., Weston, M. D., Sanjeevi, D. C., Millemon, A. R., Fritzsch, B., Hallworth, R., et al. (2008). Evolutionary insights into the unique electromotility motor of mammalian outer hair cells. Evol. Dev. 10, 300–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00239.x
Pan, B., Géléoc, G. S., Asai, Y., Horwitz, G. C., Kurima, K., Ishikawa, K., et al. (2013). TMC1 and TMC2 are components of the mechanotransduction channel in hair cells of the mammalian inner ear. Neuron 79, 504–515. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.019
Pauley, S., Lai, E., and Fritzsch, B. (2006). Foxg1 is required for morphogenesis and histogenesis of the mammalian inner ear. Dev. Dyn. 235, 2470–2482. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20839
Qian, D., Jones, C., Rzadzinska, A., Mark, S., Zhang, X., Steel, K. P., et al. (2007). Wnt5a functions in planar cell polarity regulation in mice. Dev. Biol. 306, 121–133. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.03.011
Qu, Y., Huang, Y., Feng, J., Alvarez-Bolado, G., Grove, E. A., Yang, Y., et al. (2014). Genetic evidence that Celsr3 and Celsr2, together with Fzd3, regulate forebrain wiring in a Vangl-independent manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, E2996–E3004. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402105111
Rauch, S. D., Velazquez-Villaseñor, L., Dimitri, P. S., and Merchant, S. N. (2001). Decreasing hair cell counts in aging humans. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 942, 220–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03748.x
Reichenbach, T., and Hudspeth, A. (2014). The physics of hearing: fluid mechanics and the active process of the inner ear. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77:076601. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/77/7/076601
Ren, T., He, W., and Kemp, D. (2016). Reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibrations in living mouse cochleae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 9910–9915. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607428113
Richter, C.-P., Emadi, G., Getnick, G., Quesnel, A., and Dallos, P. (2007). Tectorial membrane stiffness gradients. Biophys. J. 93, 2265–2276. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.094474
Rubel, E. W., and Fritzsch, B. (2002). Auditory system development: primary auditory neurons and their targets. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 51–101. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142849
Russell, I. J., Legan, P. K., Lukashkina, V. A., Lukashkin, A. N., Goodyear, R. J., and Richardson, G. P. (2007). Sharpened cochlear tuning in a mouse with a genetically modified tectorial membrane. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 215–223. doi: 10.1038/nn1828
Schwander, M., Kachar, B., and Müller, U. (2010). The cell biology of hearing. J. Cell Biol. 190, 9–20. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201001138
Shibata, S. B., Ranum, P. T., Moteki, H., Pan, B., Goodwin, A. T., Goodman, S. S., et al. (2016). RNA interference prevents autosomal-dominant hearing loss. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 98, 1101–1113. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.028
Sienknecht, U. J., Köppl, C., and Fritzsch, B. (2014). Evolution and development of hair cell polarity and efferent function in the inner ear. Brain Behav. Evol. 83, 150–161. doi: 10.1159/000357752
Simmons, D., Duncan, J., de Caprona, D. C., and Fritzsch, B. (2011). Development of the Inner Ear Efferent System, Auditory and Vestibular Efferents. New York, NY: Springer, 187–216. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7070-1_7
Song, H., Hu, J., Chen, W., Elliott, G., Andre, P., Gao, B., et al. (2010). Planar cell polarity breaks bilateral symmetry by controlling ciliary positioning. Nature 466, 378–382. doi: 10.1038/nature09129
Tao, H., Inoue, K.-I., Kiyonari, H., Bassuk, A. G., Axelrod, J. D., Sasaki, H., et al. (2012). Nuclear localization of Prickle2 is required to establish cell polarity during early mouse embryogenesis. Dev. Biol. 364, 138–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.01.025
Tavazzani, E., Spaiardi, P., Zampini, V., Contini, D., Manca, M., Russo, G., et al. (2016). Distinct roles of Eps8 in the maturation of cochlear and vestibular hair cells. Neuroscience 328, 80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.04.038
Torres, M., Gómez-Pardo, E., and Gruss, P. (1996). Pax2 contributes to inner ear patterning and optic nerve trajectory. Development 122, 3381–3391.
Ueyama, T., Sakaguchi, H., Nakamura, T., Goto, A., Morioka, S., Shimizu, A., et al. (2014). Maintenance of stereocilia and apical junctional complexes by Cdc42 in cochlear hair cells. J. Cell Sci. 127, 2040–2052. doi: 10.1242/jcs.143602
Vélez-Ortega, A. C., Freeman, M. J., Indzhykulian, A. A., Grossheim, J. M., and Frolenkov, G. I. (2017). Mechanotransduction current is essential for stability of the transducing stereocilia in mammalian auditory hair cells. elife 6:e24661. doi: 10.7554/eLife.24661
Vélez-Ortega, A. C., and Frolenkov, G. I. (2017). Auditory hair cell stereocilia: balancing stability to gain sensitivity? Hear. J. 70, 8–9. doi: 10.1097/01.HJ.0000527208.28817.42
Walters, B. J., Coak, E., Dearman, J., Bailey, G., Yamashita, T., Kuo, B., et al. (2017). In vivo interplay between p27Kip1, GATA3, ATOH1, and POU4F3 converts non-sensory cells to hair cells in adult mice. Cell Rep. 19, 307–320. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.044
Wang, F., Wang, Q., Li, C., Yu, P., Qu, Y., and Zhou, L. (2017). The role of Celsr3 in the development of central somatosensory projections from dorsal root ganglia. Neuroscience 359, 267–276. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.040
Wang, Y., Guo, N., and Nathans, J. (2006). The role of Frizzled3 and Frizzled6 in neural tube closure and in the planar polarity of inner-ear sensory hair cells. J. Neurosci. 26, 2147–2156. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4698-05.2005
White, P. M., Doetzlhofer, A., Lee, Y. S., Groves, A. K., and Segil, N. (2006). Mammalian cochlear supporting cells can divide and trans-differentiate into hair cells. Nature 441, 984–987. doi: 10.1038/nature04849
Xia, A., Udagawa, T., Raphael, P. D., Cheng, A. G., Steele, C. R., Applegate, B. E., et al. (2018). “Basilar membrane vibration after targeted removal of the third row of OHCs and Deiters cells,” in Proceedings of the AIP Conference, (Melville, NY: AIP Publishing). doi: 10.1063/1.5038451
Yang, J., Bouvron, S., Lv, P., Chi, F., and Yamoah, E. N. (2012). Functional features of trans-differentiated hair cells mediated by Atoh1 reveals a primordial mechanism. J. Neurosci. 32, 3712–3725. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6093-11.2012
Yang, T., Kersigo, J., Wu, S., Fritzsch, B., and Bassuk, A. G. (2017). Prickle1 regulates neurite outgrowth of apical spiral ganglion neurons but not hair cell polarity in the murine cochlea. PLoS One 12:e0183773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183773
Yin, H., Copley, C. O., Goodrich, L. V., and Deans, M. R. (2012). Comparison of phenotypes between different vangl2 mutants demonstrates dominant effects of the Looptail mutation during hair cell development. PLoS One 7:e31988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031988
Keywords: organ of Corti evolution, hair cell planar cell polarity, hair cell kinocilium loss, MET channel mutation effects, PCP effects on sensory neurons
Citation: Elliott KL, Fritzsch B and Duncan JS (2018) Evolutionary and Developmental Biology Provide Insights Into the Regeneration of Organ of Corti Hair Cells. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12:252. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00252
Received: 19 March 2018; Accepted: 23 July 2018;
Published: 08 August 2018.
Edited by:
Michael E. Smith, Western Kentucky University, United StatesReviewed by:
Andy Groves, Baylor College of Medicine, United StatesJerry David Monroe, Western Kentucky University, United States
Matthew William Kelley, National Institutes of Health (NIH), United States
Copyright © 2018 Elliott, Fritzsch and Duncan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jeremy S. Duncan, jeremy.duncan@wmich.edu