This article is a correction to:
Development under predation risk increases serotonin-signaling, variability of turning behavior and survival in adult fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster
Tatjana Krama1,2
Māris Munkevics1,3
Ronalds Krams1,2
Tatjana Grigorjeva1
Giedrius Trakimas1,4
Priit Jõers5
Sergejs Popovs1
Krists Zants3
Didzis Elferts6Markus J. Rantala7
Eriks Sledevskis8
Jorge Contreras-Garduño9,10
Benjamin L. de Bivort11
Indrikis A. Krams3,12,13,14*- 1Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Life Sciences and Technologies, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia
- 2Chair of Plant Health, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia
- 3Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
- 4Institute of Biosciences, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
- 5Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- 6Department of Botany and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
- 7Department of Biology, Turku Brain and Mind Center, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- 8Department of Technology, Institute of Life Sciences and Technologies, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia
- 9Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Mexico
- 10Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
- 11Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
- 12Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia
- 13Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- 14Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States
A corrigendum on
Development under predation risk increases serotonin-signaling, variability of turning behavior and survival in adult fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster
by Krama, T., Munkevics, M., Krams, R., Grigorjeva, T., Trakimas, G., Jõers, P., Popovs, S., Zants, K., Elferts, D., Rantala, M. J., Sledevskis, E., Contreras-Garduño, J., de Bivort, B. L., and Krams, I. A. (2023). Front. Behav. Neurosci. 17:1189301. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1189301
In the published article, there was an error: five sentences are missing.
A correction has been made to Materials and methods, “Prey, predators, developmental speed, and the main treatment groups,” the very end of the 4th paragraph. After this sentence: “The density of F1 first-instar larvae across the vials was similar, and we averaged the density to 120 larvae/vial by removing extra larvae with a squirrel brush (Krams et al., 2016),” there should be five more sentences.
The corrected paragraph appears below:
“We isolated fruit flies using carbon dioxide anesthesia within 6–7 h after eclosion. Ten F0 females and ten males were placed for 24 h in one vial (Flystuff polystyrene vials; Genesee Scientific, El Cajon, CA, USA, 24 mm inner diameter × 95 mm height) containing 6 ml of Cal Tech medium. After 24 h, the adults were removed, and the vials were placed horizontally on the floor of Plexiglas jars (10 cm height × 12 cm diameter). The density of F1 first-instar larvae across the vials was similar, and we averaged the density to 120 larvae/vial by removing extra larvae with a squirrel brush (Krams et al., 2016). Vials with Drosophila larvae were randomly divided into two groups: one that was exposed to spiders and one that was not. In the spider-treated group, a single P. apacheanus individual was also included in each Plexiglas jar. The vials did not have stoppers, giving the spider free access to the developing flies (as well as the fly media). Developing flies were also exposed to the odor of the spider throughout the container. Flies for behavioral and survival assays were removed the day after they eclosed, without anesthesia, and transferred to drug-treated vials as described below.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Keywords: Drosophila melanogaster, behavioral predictability, serotonin, survival under predation, turning behavior
Citation: Krama T, Munkevics M, Krams R, Grigorjeva T, Trakimas G, Jõers P, Popovs S, Zants K, Elferts D, Rantala MJ, Sledevskis E, Contreras-Garduño J, de Bivort BL and Krams IA (2024) Corrigendum: Development under predation risk increases serotonin-signaling, variability of turning behavior and survival in adult fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 18:1391782. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1391782
Received: 26 February 2024; Accepted: 06 March 2024;
Published: 22 March 2024.
Edited and reviewed by: Walter Adriani, National Institute of Health (ISS), Italy
Copyright © 2024 Krama, Munkevics, Krams, Grigorjeva, Trakimas, Jõers, Popovs, Zants, Elferts, Rantala, Sledevskis, Contreras-Garduño, de Bivort and Krams. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Indrikis A. Krams, indrikis.krams@ut.ee