Neuropsychobiological Fingerprints of Chronic Fatigue in Sarcoidosis

Abstract

Background:

Chronic fatigue is a prominent symptom in many sarcoidosis patients, affecting quality of life and interfering with treatment. This study investigated neuropsychobiological mechanisms and markers of chronic fatigue in sarcoidosis.

Methods:

Thirty patients with a histological diagnosis of sarcoidosis were included. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory was used to define patients with and without chronic fatigue. All patients were then characterised using several depression, quality of life questionnaires, and executive functioning. Cognitive functioning and underlying neural correlates were assessed using an n-back task measuring working memory and (sustained) attention during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Sarcoidosis disease activity was determined using lung function, laboratory parameters, and exercise capacity.

Results:

Nineteen patients had chronic fatigue and 11 did not; both groups had similar demographic and disease activity characteristics. Chronic fatigue patients showed more symptoms of depression and anxiety, and lower quality of life. During the n-back task, chronic fatigue was associated with a smaller increase in brain activation with increasing task difficulty versus the group without fatigue, especially in the angular gyrus.

Conclusion:

Inadequate adjustment of brain activation with increasing demands appears to be a potential neurobiological marker of chronic fatigue in sarcoidosis patients. The angular gyrus, which plays an important role in the working memory system, was the major area in which fatigue patients showed smaller increase of brain activation compared to those without fatigue. These findings might be relevant for a deeper understanding of chronic fatigue mechanisms in sarcoidosis and future clinical treatment of this disabling syndrome.

Trial Registration:

ClinicalTrials.gov, Trial registration number: NCT04178239

Date of registration: November 26, 2019, retrospectively registered

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04178239.

Introduction

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown aetiology characterised by non-caseating epithelioid cell granulomas. Clinical manifestations and symptoms are highly variable (Marcellis et al., 2011; Drent et al., 2012; Lal et al., 2015). Sarcoidosis patients frequently experience chronic fatigue (CF), characterised by severe disabling fatigue, physical and/or mental weariness, reduced sensation of strength, lack of energy, feeling of complete exhaustion, myalgia, sleep reversal, and/or low spiritedness without any organic cause (Korenromp et al., 2011; Marcellis et al., 2011). The prevalence of CF in sarcoidosis varies from 50 to 80%; its aetiology is not yet understood (Korenromp et al., 2011; Drent et al., 2012; Lal et al., 2015). CF markedly impairs quality of life (QoL), without any established possibility for adequate treatment (Kleijn et al., 2011; Drent et al., 2012; Fleischer et al., 2014; Lal et al., 2015). However, markers indicative of the occurrence, severity, or impact of CF in sarcoidosis have not yet been identified.

The aim of this study was to characterise CF in sarcoidosis based on its neuropsychobiological correlates, specifically whether CF in sarcoidosis leads to cognitive impairment and quantifiable neural alterations in the brain, and whether these features could be used to distinguish between sarcoidosis patients with versus without CF. To achieve this, we used a wide range of neuropsychological questionnaires and a common, standardised cognitive task (n-back) during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The n-back task assesses attention and working memory (WM) (Caseras et al., 2006; Cook et al., 2007) and robustly reveals activations in a fronto-parieto-cerebellar network (Seghier, 2013; Jacola et al., 2014). CF would be expected to be associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety, and impaired QoL in sarcoidosis patients. An additional hypothesis was that sarcoidosis patients with CF would demonstrate alterations in activation of the fronto-parieto-cerebellar network during n-back task due to alterations in WM, similar to previous studies of CF patients without sarcoidosis (Caseras et al., 2006; Bartes-Serrallonga et al., 2014; Provenzano et al., 2020), and that reduced cognitive function would occur in parallel with reduced brain network activation as WM demands increase.

Materials and Methods

Study Subjects

Adult patients with histologically diagnosed sarcoidosis were screened for eligibility. Main exclusion criteria were MRI-related contraindications, such as past thoracic or ophthalmologic surgery, medical history of epilepsy, tinnitus or seizure, extensive tattoos, or current pregnancy. Eligible patients were divided into two groups (CF and no CF [NCF]) based on the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI).

Assessments

The MFI is an instrument to assess fatigue severity and has previously been used in studies of CF in sarcoidosis (Fleischer et al., 2014; Bosse-Henck et al., 2015). For each item, a score from 1 to 5 is possible, resulting in a total score of 20–100 (Smets et al., 1995). In this study, CF was diagnosed in patients with a total score of >53 based on the 75th percentile of norm values (Schwarz et al., 2003) as primary developed by Kuhnt et al. (2009) and used in several studies with cohorts of sarcoidosis patients (Hinz et al., 2011; Fleischer et al., 2014; Bosse-Henck et al., 2015).

In addition to the MFI, participants also completed the Fatigue Assessment Scale, which is frequently used in groups of sarcoidosis patients (Kleijn et al., 2011; Drent et al., 2012), and the Fatigue Impact Scale to assess the impact of fatigue on health-related QoL (Häuser et al., 2003).

Symptoms of depression were measured using two self-assessments (Allgemeine Depressionsskala (Hautzinger et al., 2012) and Rasch-basiertes Depressionsscreening (Forkmann et al., 2011)) and one clinical assessment (Hamilton Depression Scale (Hamilton, 1960)). Anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Spielberger et al., 1983)), QoL (WHOQOL-BREF (Harper, 1998)), subjective impairment of physical and psychological symptoms (Brief Symptom Inventory (Franke, 2000)), and executive functions (Trail Making Test (Reitan, 1956)) were also assessed.

Demographic data and disease history were recorded for all patients, and blood samples were taken. Standard clinical parameters for sarcoidosis disease activity, including complete blood count, circulating levels of C-reactive protein, soluble interleukin-2 receptor, neopterin, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) polymorphism, and calcium were measured in serum and whole blood.

Whole body plethysmography (MasterLab, Viasys, Hoechberg, Germany) was performed according to current recommendations (Miller et al., 2005; Wanger et al., 2005). Norm values were calculated according to Matthys et al. (1995). Samples for arterial blood gas analyses were taken from patients’ arterialised earlobe while breathing room air (ABL 800 flex, Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark).

Exercise capacity was assessed using a standardised 6-min walking test (6MWT) (Ats Committee on Proficiency Standard for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories, 2002). Oxygen saturation before and at the end of the 6MWT was assessed via pulsoximetry and dyspnoea was rated on the Borg Dyspnea Scale (Borg, 1982).

Mean differences in between the CF and NCF groups were tested using independent samples t-tests.

n-Back Task

During fMRI, a visual n-back task was performed, which included four conditions for parametric modulation of WM load. As a baseline condition (“fixation”), participants were presented with a series of letters that they should watch without any need to respond. In the 0-back condition, subjects were required to respond to the target letter “X” via button-press with their right index finger, and in the 1-back condition, they had to respond to the second of two consecutive identical letters. In the 2-back condition, participants had to respond to letters identical to the one presented two letters before (Figure 1). The target letter “X” from the 0-back task did not appear in the 1-back or 2-back task. Each of the three conditions 0-back, 1-back, and 2-back appeared five times, alternating with 15 baseline blocks. Every block was initiated by a 2.5-s task instruction, and stimuli were presented for 500 ms each. For each n-back block, 19 letters were presented, resulting in a block duration (including instructions) of 29.7 s. Baseline blocks included 10 stimuli, resulting in a block duration (including instructions) of 17.2 s. Total duration of the paradigm was 11 min 46 s. Stimuli were presented on a projection screen visible through a mirror attached to the head coil. Stimulus presentation and response acquisition were controlled via Presentation software (Neurobehavioral Systems, Inc., Albany, CA, United States). Average hit rates (number of correct responses divided by the total number of possible correct responses) and reaction times (time from presentation of the target until button-press) were measured for each condition for each participant.

FIGURE 1

Behavioural and cerebral responses on the n-back task for each subject were averaged per condition. For both behavioural and brain data, ANOVAs with condition ([baseline], 0-back, 1-back, and 2-back) as a within-subject factor and group (CF, NCF) as a between-subject factor were performed. Although hit rates were not normally distributed, ANOVAs have been found to be robust to distributional differences, even for small samples (Blanca et al., 2017).

Significance level was set to α = 0.05. Bonferroni and familywise error corrections were applied in IBM SPSS Statistics 24 and SPM12, respectively.

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

fMRI data were obtained on a 3-T Prisma MR scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, Germany). Images were obtained with a gradient-echo EPI sequence (TR 2500 ms, TE 30 ms, 3.1 × 3.1 × 3.1 mm³ voxel size, FoV 200 × 200 mm², 38 slices, 77° flip angle, distance factor 25%). Additionally, a high-resolution structural image (3-D Magnetization Prepared Rapid Gradient Echo [MP-RAGE]) was acquired with the following parameters: TR 2000 ms, TE 3.03 ms, TI 900 ms, 9° flip angle, FoV = 256 × 256 mm², 176 slices, 1 × 1 × 1 mm³ voxel size.

fMRI Data Processing and Analysis

Statistical parametric mapping (SPM12, Welcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, London) was used for pre-processing, and analyses with standard algorithms and parameters were applied unless otherwise specified. Pre-processing included realignment of data to correct for head movement, and slice timing. The mean functional image was coregistered and normalised to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) single-subject template (Collins et al., 1994) using linear proportions and a non-linear sampling as derived from a segmentation algorithm (Ashburner, 2005). Images were spatially smoothed using an 8-mm full-width-at-half maximum Gaussian kernel.

In the GLM analysis for each subject, the four experimental conditions (baseline, 0-back, 1-back, and 2-back) were modelled block-wise by convolving vectors of onset times with the canonical haemodynamic response function. In addition, six head movement parameters from the realignment were included as regressors of no interest in the first-level model. Finally, images were high-pass filtered at 128 s, and an autoregressive AR(1) model was used to account for serial correlations in fMRI time series.

Statistical analyses at the group level were performed by subjecting the four task-relevant contrast images to a full factorial ANOVA with the factors condition (baseline, 0-back, 1-back, and 2-back) and group (CF and NCF). The main effects of condition and group, and interactions between these two factors, were tested. All effects were thresholded at p < 0.05 at cluster-level, familywise error corrected for multiple comparisons (pFWE < 0.05), with an underlying voxel-level threshold of p < 0.001, uncorrected. This entails a minimum cluster size of k > 217. Activation maxima are reported as Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) coordinates; anatomical locations are based on SPM Anatomy Toolbox Version 2.2b (Eickhoff et al., 2005).

Results

Of 184 patients screened for eligibility, 30 patients were included into the study (Figure 2). Of these, 19 had an MFI score of >53 points and were therefore assigned to the CF group; the remaining 11 were assigned to the NCF group. The two groups did not differ significantly in age, height, weight, body mass index, duration of illness, number of affected organs, or laboratory parameters (Table 1). Lung function and 6MWT were also similar in the two groups (Table 2).

FIGURE 2

Questionnaires

Fatigue, depression, and anxiety questionnaires’ overall and sub-domain scores showed significantly greater fatigue, anxiety, and depression in the CF versus NCF group (all p < 0.001). WHOQOL-BREF physical health and global domains differed significantly between the two groups; after correction for multiple testing, no significant differences were found in the social relationships, psychologic health, and environmental health domains. In addition, the CF group showed more subjective impairments in physical and psychological symptoms based on the BSI, both overall and in the somatisation, obsessive–compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobia, and extra items domains (all p < 0.05); there were no statistically significant between-group differences in the paranoia (p = 0.05) and psychoticism (p = 0.149) domains. Executive functions were similar in the CF and NCF groups (all Table 3).

n-Back Task

Hit rates in the n-back task decreased with increasing task difficulty in both groups, and reaction times increased. There was a significant main effect of condition (within-subject effect), but not group (between-subject effect), for both hit rates and reaction times, with no significant interaction (Table 4 and Figure 3).

FIGURE 3

fMRI Data

In both groups, more difficult conditions of the n-back task elicited more brain activation versus conditions that required less WM, especially in parietal and frontal brain areas (Table 5 and Figure 4). Simultaneously, middle cingulate cortex, rolandic operculum, insular lobe, and superior medial gyrus showed decreasing activation in the 2-back versus less demanding conditions. No significant between-subject effect was found.

FIGURE 4

In terms of interactions, the CF group showed more angular gyrus activation than the NCF group in the contrast 0-back > baseline condition. All other significant interactions showed less activation with increasing n-back task difficulty in the CF versus NCF group (Table 6 and Figure 5). Affected brain areas were especially the angular gyrus and, furthermore, the inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, superior medial gyrus, thalamus, anterior cingulate cortex, and superior parietal lobule. Exploratory correlational analyses of questionnaire, clinical, behavioural, and fMRI data yielded no significant results after correction for multiple testing. Correction for covariates gender and age in significant interactions between group and n-back contrast revealed no significant changes in results.

FIGURE 5

Discussion

This is the first time that CF in sarcoidosis has been characterised neuropsychobiologically using fMRI and is therefore an important step towards more comprehensive investigation of this poorly understood and disabling symptom. This study has successfully shown that in addition to being a subjective phenomenon, CF can also be characterised on a cerebral level.

CF patients, who demonstrated fatigue in all subdomains of the fatigue scales used, showed significantly less brain activation with increasingly complex cognitive conditions versus those without fatigue, during the n-back task. Disease activity was similar in both groups. Furthermore, CF patients demonstrated more symptoms of depression and anxiety, worse QoL, and more subjective impairment due to physical and psychological symptoms, similar to results of other studies in sarcoidosis cohorts (Kleijn et al., 2011; Korenromp et al., 2011; Drent et al., 2012; Lower et al., 2013; Saligan, 2014). These results underline the high impact of CF in sarcoidosis and the important need for further investigation of this debilitating symptom and potential treatment strategies.

The n-back task is widely used for assessment of (sustained) attention and WM (Bartes-Serrallonga et al., 2014; Jacola et al., 2014). Using this task, we could show alterations in the neural correlates underlying these functions in fatigued sarcoidosis patients. WM performance (hit rates and reaction times in the n-back task) did not significantly differ between patients with versus without fatigue, but fatigue patients tended to show fewer correct responses while differences between the two groups became greater as task difficulty increased. A similar pattern was found in a study of WM in CF syndrome (independent of any somatic disease) (Caseras et al., 2006). It is possible that the brain compensates for fatigue at lower levels of performance and that the effects of fatigue might only be detected at a higher cognitive demand, e.g., 3-back task, 4-back task. A compensation of fatigue at lower WM demand is revealed additionally in the form of reversed angular gyrus activity with progressively difficult testing (decrease in CF, increase in NCF group).

Patients with versus without fatigue showed more activation in the angular gyrus in the 0-back task compared with the baseline condition. For all other comparisons showing significant interactions, the CF group had less activation in more demanding tasks compared with the NCF group. Areas showing reduced activation during more demanding tasks in the CF group were the angular gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, superior medial gyrus, thalamus, anterior cingulate cortex, and superior parietal lobule. These areas, which all show significant activation in the underlying contrasts as well, are mostly located in frontal and parietal regions, which are known to be part of the WM network (Caseras et al., 2006; Nissim et al., 2016). Activation patterns found in our study therefore illustrate an impact of CF on WM function and its underlying neural correlates in sarcoidosis patients.

Interactions in terms of CF patients showing a reduced activation with increasing task difficulty compared to the NCF group have been detected in a fMRI study regarding CF independent from sarcoidosis as well (Caseras et al., 2006). Main regions in this study are the right middle frontal gyrus as well as the bilateral parietal cortex; they are therefore partly overlapping with the clusters in our study. Our main cluster of activation in interactions, the angular gyrus, has so far proven to play a role in CF independent from sarcoidosis in terms of n-back interactions.

The angular gyrus, which occupies a posterior part of the inferior parietal lobule (Seghier, 2013), was the major cluster of activation in almost all significant interactions. In previous studies, the angular gyrus has shown the greatest change in global connectivity in the different conditions of the n-back task (Seghier, 2013; Vatansever et al., 2017). Therefore, it appears to be one of the major connector hubs linking different cerebral subsystems and to be responsible for reorienting the attentional system towards relevant information. It is also known to be an important part of the default mode network, which is actively involved in the n-back task and thus plays an important role in WM (Seghier, 2013; Vatansever et al., 2017). Previous studies on CF syndrome described less organised default mode connectivity as a potential diagnostic biomarker of CF (Shan et al., 2018). Along these lines, our findings suggest that CF patients do not recruit their WM system and functions in the bilateral angular gyrus according to the task demands in the same way as sarcoidosis patients without CF. They demonstrate less cognitive involvement and an inferior cerebral processing than NCF patients (depicted by their minor increase in activation with increased task difficulty). This is supported by the fact that default mode network connectivity (of which the angular gyrus forms an important part) in CF syndrome in the absence of sarcoidosis is less organised and could potentially be used as a diagnostic biomarker for CF (Shan et al., 2018).

Other clusters of activation in significant interactions are, among others, the middle frontal gyrus as well as the inferior frontal gyrus. These regions have also proven to be part of the WM system; the middle frontal gyrus plays a crucial role in regulating attention networks and is known to be involved in attention processing and sustained attention control (Dumas et al., 2013; Song et al., 2019; Salminen et al., 2020). The CF’s incapacity of recruiting these areas the same way NCF patients do once again underlines minor cognitive involvement and inferior cerebral processing in CF. This is supported by the fact that these regions that strike out significantly in interactions are part of the underlying contrasts. Middle frontal gyrus has as well been detected as a cluster of less activation with increasing n-back task demand in CF independent from sarcoidosis (Caseras et al., 2006). The similarity in results depicts a possible transferability between CF in the presence or absence of somatic diseases such as sarcoidosis. As the n-back task in fMRI has been considered to be a potential diagnostic biomarker in CFS independent from sarcoidosis (Caseras et al., 2006; Cook et al., 2007; Provenzano et al., 2020), it proves to be one for CF in sarcoidosis as well.

Our findings showing similar disease parameters and demographic data in sarcoidosis patients with versus without CF are similar to the majority of those in the published literature (Marcellis et al., 2011; Drent et al., 2012; Saligan, 2014). The lack of association between fatigue and clinical measurements highlights the relevance of our results. Differences between the CF and NCF groups in sarcoidosis cannot be explained by alterations in disease activity but can clearly be demonstrated using clinical questionnaires and assessment of cognitive functions (as visualised by fMRI).

However, our sample size is quite small, and MRI contraindications could have contributed to selection bias. Generalisability is limited by the absence of a healthy comparator population. Therefore, our findings (especially those relating to fMRI) need to be confirmed in a larger sample of sarcoidosis patients and healthy controls.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we found a significant neuropsychobiological marker of fatigue in sarcoidosis patients with CF, who showed similar disease activity to sarcoidosis patients without CF. Those with CF appeared to differ in allocation of resources necessary for successful mastering of cognitive challenges, being unable to adequately recruit brain areas responsible for attention and WM in the same way that patients without fatigue do, particularly regarding the angular gyrus. This is consistent with findings in CF patients without sarcoidosis. Due to the high prevalence and detrimental impact of CF in sarcoidosis patients, our findings form an important basis for further investigations of biomarkers of fatigue and possible treatment strategies.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

• 1

  AshburnerJ. F. K. J. (2005). Unified segmentation.Neuroimage26839–851. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  Ats Committee on Proficiency Standard for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. (2002). ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test.Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.166111–117. 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  Bartes-SerrallongaM.AdanA.Sole-CasalsJ.CaldúX.FalcónC.Pérez-PàmiesM.et al (2014). Cerebral networks of sustained attention and working memory: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study based on the Continuous Performance Test.Rev. Neurol.58289–295.

  • Google Scholar

• 4

  BlancaM. J.AlarcónR.ArnauJ.BonoR.BendayanR. (2017). Non-normal data: is ANOVA still a valid option?.Psicothema29552–557.

  • Google Scholar

• 5

  BorgG. A. (1982). Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.14377–381.

  • Google Scholar

• 6

  Bosse-HenckA.WirtzH.HinzA. (2015). Subjective sleep quality in sarcoidosis.Sleep Med.16570–576. 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.12.025

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  CaserasX.Mataix-ColsD.GiampietroV.RimesK. A.BrammerM.ZelayaF.et al (2006). Probing the working memory system in chronic fatigue syndrome: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study using the n-back task.Psychosom. Med.68947–955. 10.1097/01.psy.0000242770.50979.5f

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  CollinsD. L.NeelinP.PetersT. M.EvansA. C. (1994). Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space.J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.18192–205. 10.1097/00004728-199403000-00005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  CookD. B.O’ConnorP. J.LangeG.SteffenerJ. (2007). Functional neuroimaging correlates of mental fatigue induced by cognition among chronic fatigue syndrome patients and controls.Neuroimage36108–122. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.033

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  DrentM.LowerE. E.de.VriesJ. (2012). Sarcoidosis-associated fatigue.Eur. Respir. J.40255–263. 10.1183/09031936.00002512

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  DumasJ. A.KutzA. M.McDonaldB. C.NaylorM. R.PfaffA. C.SaykinA. J.et al (2013). Increased working memory-related brain activity in middle-aged women with cognitive complaints.Neurobiol. Aging341145–1147. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.08.013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  EickhoffS. B.StephanK. E.MohlbergH.GrefkesC.FinkG. R.AmuntsK.et al (2005). A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data.Neuroimage251325–1335. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  FleischerM.HinzA.BrahlerE.WirtzH.Bosse-HenckA. (2014). Factors associated with fatigue in sarcoidosis.Respir. Care591086–1094. 10.4187/respcare.02080

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  ForkmannT.BöckerM.WirtzM.GauggelS.NorraC. (2011). Rasch-basiertes depressionsscreening [DESC]. Rasch Based Depres. Screen.10.6099/1000058

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  FrankeG. H. (2000). BSI: Brief Symptom Inventory von L.R. Derogatis.Göttingen: Beltz-Testges.

  • Google Scholar

• 16

  HamiltonM. (1960). A rating scale for depression.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry2356–62.

  • Google Scholar

• 17

  HarperA. P. M. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment.Psychol. Med.28551–558. 10.1017/s0033291798006667

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  HäuserW.AlmouhtassebR.MuthnyF.GrandtD. (2003). Validation of a German version of the Fatigue Impact Scale FIS-D.Z. Gastroenterol.41973–982. 10.1055/s-2003-42927

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  HautzingerM.BailerM.HofmeisterD.KellerF. (2012). Allgemeine Depressionsskala: Manual. 2nd ed.Göttingen: Hogrefe.

  • Google Scholar

• 20

  HinzA.FleischerM.BrahlerE.WirtzH.Bosse-HenckA. (2011). Fatigue in patients with sarcoidosis, compared with the general population.Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry33462–468. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.05.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  JacolaL. M.WillardV. W.AshfordJ. M.OggR. J.ScogginsM. A.JonesM. M.et al (2014). Clinical utility of the n-back task in functional neuroimaging studies of working memory.J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol.36875–886. 10.1080/13803395.2014.953039

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  KleijnW. P.de VriesJ.de WijnenP. A.DrentM. (2011). Minimal (clinically) important differences for the Fatigue Assessment Scale in sarcoidosis.Respir. Med.1051388–1395. 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.05.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  KorenrompI. H.HeijnenC. J.VogelsO. J.van den BoschJ. M. M.GruttersJ. C. (2011). Characterization of chronic fatigue in patients with sarcoidosis in clinical remission.Chest140441–447. 10.1378/chest.10-2629

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  KuhntS.ErnstJ.SingerS.RüfferJ. U.KortmannR.-D.StolzenburgJ.-U.et al (2009). Fatigue in cancer survivors–prevalence and correlates.Onkologie32312–317. 10.1159/000215943

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  LalC.MedarovB. I.JudsonM. A. (2015). The interrelationship between sleep disordered breathing and sarcoidosis.Chest1481105–1114. 10.1378/chest.15-0584

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  LowerE. E.MalhotraA.SurdulescuV.BaughmanR. P. (2013). Armodafinil for sarcoidosis-associated fatigue: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.J. Pain Symptom Manage.45159–169. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.02.016

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  MarcellisR. G.LenssenA. F.ElfferichM. D.De VriesJ.KassimS.FoersterK.et al (2011). Exercise capacity, muscle strength and fatigue in sarcoidosis.Eur. Respir. J.38628–634. 10.1183/09031936.00117710

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  MatthysH.ZaissA. W.TheissenJ. L.VirchowJ. C.WernerP. (1995). Definitionen, Soll- und Meßwerte zur Diagnose obstruktiver, restriktiver sowie gemischter Ventilationsstörungen für die klinische Lungenfunktionsdiagnostik.Atemw Lungenkrkh21130–138.

  • Google Scholar

• 29

  MillerM. R.HankinsonJ.BrusascoV.BurgosF.CasaburiR.CoatesA.et al (2005). Standardisation of spirometry.Eur. Respir. J.26319–338. 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  NissimN. R.O’SheaA. M.BryantV.PorgesE. C.CohenR.WoodsA. J. (2016). Frontal structural neural correlates of working memory performance in older adults.Front. Aging Neurosci.8:328. 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00328

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  ProvenzanoD.WashingtonS. D.BaraniukJ. N. A. (2020). Machine Learning Approach to the Differentiation of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) From a Sedentary Control.Front. Comput. Neurosci.14:2. 10.3389/fncom.2020.00002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  ReitanR. (1956). Trail Making Test: Manual for Administration, Scoring And Interpretation.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Google Scholar

• 33

  SaliganL. N. (2014). The relationship between physical activity, functional performance and fatigue in sarcoidosis.J. Clin. Nurs.232376–2378. 10.1111/jocn.12490

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  SalminenT.ForlimC. G.SchubertT.KühnS. (2020). Dual n-back training improves functional connectivity of the right inferior frontal gyrus at rest.Sci. Rep.10:20379. 10.1038/s41598-020-77310-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  SchwarzR.KraussO.HinzA. (2003). Fatigue in the general population.Oncol. Res. Treat.26140–144. 10.1159/000069834

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  SeghierM. L. (2013). The angular gyrus: multiple functions and multiple subdivisions.Neuroscientist1943–61. 10.1177/1073858412440596

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  ShanZ. Y.FineganK.BhutaS.IrelandT.StainesD. R.Marshall-GradisnikS. M.et al (2018). Decreased connectivity and increased blood oxygenation level dependent complexity in the default mode network in individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome.Brain Connect.833–39. 10.1089/brain.2017.0549

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  SmetsE. M.GarssenB.BonkeB.De HaesJ. C. (1995). The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue.J. Psychosom. Res.39315–325. 10.1016/0022-3999(94)00125-o

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  SongP.LinH.LiuC.JiangY.LinY.XueQ.et al (2019). Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Middle Frontal Gyrus During Attention Modes Induced Dynamic Module Reconfiguration in Brain Networks.Front. Neuroinform.13:22. 10.3389/fninf.2019.00022

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  SpielbergerC. D.GorsuchR. L.LusheneR.VaggP. R.JacobsG. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  • Google Scholar

• 41

  VatanseverD.ManktelowA. E.SahakianB. J.MenonD. K.StamatakisE. A. (2017). Angular default mode network connectivity across working memory load.Hum. Brain Mapp.3841–52. 10.1002/hbm.23341

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  WangerJ.ClausenJ. L.CoatesA.PedersenO. F.BrusascoV.BurgosF.et al (2005). Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes.Eur. Respir. J.26511–522.

  • Google Scholar