Abstract
Prenatal alcohol exposure has been found to be an important factor determining later consumption of this drug. In humans, despite the considerable diversity of variables that might influence alcohol consumption, longitudinal studies show that maternal alcohol intake during gestation is one of the best predictors of later alcohol use from adolescence to young adulthood. Experimental studies with animals also provide abundant evidence of the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on later alcohol intake. In addition to increased consumption, other effects include enhanced palatability and attractiveness of alcohol flavor as well as sensitization to its sensory and reinforcing effects. Most of these outcomes have been obtained after exposing rats to binge-like administrations of moderate alcohol doses during the last gestational period when the fetus is already capable of detecting flavors in the amniotic fluid and learning associations with aversive or appetitive consequences. On this basis, it has been proposed that one of the mechanisms underlying the increased acceptance of alcohol after its prenatal exposure is the acquisition (by the fetus) of appetitive learning via an association between the sensory properties of alcohol and its reinforcing pharmacological effects. It also appears that this prenatal appetitive learning is mediated by the activation of the opioid system, with fetal brain acetaldehyde playing an important role, possibly as the main chemical responsible for its activation. Here, we review and analyze together the results of all animal studies testing these hypotheses through experimental manipulation of the behavioral and neurochemical elements of the assumed prenatal association. Understanding the mechanisms by which prenatal alcohol exposure favors the early initiation of alcohol consumption, along with its role in the causal pathway to alcohol disorders, may allow us to find strategies to mitigate the behavioral effects of this early experience with the drug. We propose that prenatal alcohol exposure is regarded as a case of involuntary early onset of alcohol use when designing prevention policies. This is particularly important, given the notion that the sooner alcohol intake begins, the greater the possibility of a continued history of alcohol consumption that may lead to the development of alcohol use disorders.
Introduction
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) refers to the range of adverse effects that can occur in the children of women who consume alcohol during pregnancy (Riley and McGee, 2005; Manning and Eugene Hoyme, 2007). At the most severe end of the spectrum is Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS), which may occur with prolonged consumption of relatively high amounts of alcohol (Jones and Smith, 1973; Jones et al., 1973). Prenatal exposure to alcohol may also produce either partial FAS (some of the diagnostic features occur) or may result in Alcohol-Related Birth Defects, or Alcohol-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorders (Stratton et al., 1996; Johnson et al., 2018) Interestingly, whilst the level of alcohol exposure may determine the severity of the observed effects, other cognitive, neuropsychological, and behavioral deficits have consistently been observed (Streissguth, 1986; Astley et al., 2009; Guerri et al., 2009; Kable et al., 2016; Temple et al., 2019).
Although not recognized as a symptom of FASD, there is evidence for an association between prenatal alcohol exposure and alcohol use disorders in offspring. Despite the considerable range of variables that might influence alcohol consumption by individuals, the few existing prospective longitudinal studies analyzing the relation between prenatal alcohol exposure and alcohol use by offspring all agree on one chief outcome: maternal alcohol intake during gestation is one of the best predictors of later alcohol use from adolescence to young-adulthood (Baer et al., 1998, 2003; Griesler and Kandel, 1998; Alati et al., 2006; Streissguth, 2007; Cornelius et al., 2016; Goldschmidt et al., 2019). Concurrently, numerous experimental studies with animals have shown increased alcohol intake in the offspring of dams that had consumed alcohol during gestation. These studies have been extensively reviewed in three previous publications, in which the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on infantile, adolescent and adult alcohol acceptance and intake were described, analyzing the possible mechanism involved in those effects (Spear and Molina, 2005; Chotro et al., 2007; Abate et al., 2008). In the present review, we continue to explore this issue by analyzing specific research on the subject from the last 15 years, particularly those studies that have used animal models, focusing on the importance of mechanisms related to fetal learning about alcohol.
Clinical Evidence
Most of the clinical evidence on the association between prenatal alcohol exposure and alcohol use disorders is derived mainly from a few longitudinal studies. The first of these is the āSeattle Prospective Longitudinal Study on Alcohol and Pregnancy,ā in which the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure were examined on a cohort of children born in 1974 to mothers selected as representative of the Seattle/King County population in the USA (Streissguth et al., 1981). In this study, among many other variables, alcohol use problems were measured in the offspring at three different ages: 14, 21 and 25 years. When subjects were 14 years old, three sets of data from 439 families were collected: adolescent alcohol use, family history of alcohol problems, and prenatal alcohol exposure history; and using these data they conducted correlational analyses. Prenatal alcohol exposure was found to be a better predictor of adolescent alcohol use than a family history of alcohol problems (Baer et al., 1998). When these same subjects were 21 years old, the families were re-evaluated, and it was reported that prenatal alcohol exposure was still strongly associated with a higher number of symptoms of alcohol dependence in early adulthood. This relationship persisted independently of the effects of a family history of alcohol problems, nicotine exposure, other prenatal exposures, and postnatal environmental factors including parental use of other drugs (Baer et al., 2003). At the age of 25, the association between prenatal alcohol exposure and adult alcohol use problems was still present (Streissguth, 2007). In all these cases the results were obtained after adjusting for maternal demographic characteristics, maternal use of tobacco and other drugs during pregnancy, and maternal and familial alcohol problems after birth. In line with those outcomes, alcohol exposure during gestation was also found to be a key factor for predicting alcohol use disorders in adults who were adopted at birth (Yates et al., 1998). In one study, 197 adoptees were evaluated for the use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs. Of those, 21 had received prenatal alcohol exposure and their outcomes were compared with those of 102 control adoptees who had received no alcohol exposure. The results showed that even when controlling for biological parental alcohol abuse or dependence, the prenatal alcohol exposure factor was still the best predictor of alcohol use disorders. This study highlights the relevance of alcohol exposure during prenatal development for alcohol abuse in adulthood, a relationship that appears to exist independently of confounding postnatal environmental variables (Yates et al., 1998).
Another follow-up study with participants from the āMaterāUniversity of Queensland Study of Pregnancy and Its Outcomesā was designed specifically to analyze the association between maternal alcohol exposure and the onset of alcohol disorders. This study was conducted with 2,138 participants from a population-based birth cohort, born in Brisbane, Australia in 1981 (Alati et al., 2006). Mothers and their sons/daughters were followed from pregnancy to the offspringās early adulthood, and the onset of alcohol disorders was registered from adolescence to 21 years old. The results revealed that in utero exposure to three or more drinks containing alcohol was related to alcohol use disorders at the age of 21, increasing its risk by almost three times compared with subjects exposed to either smaller amounts of alcohol or those that had received no exposure. In addition, they reported that the sons and daughters of mothers who had consumed three or more glasses of alcohol during early pregnancy were almost four times more likely to show an early onset of alcohol disorders at the age of 21 than those whose mothers had consumed less than two drinks at any time. This association was robust, even after adjusting for a number of biological and environmental factors (Alati et al., 2006). In another publication, similar results were reported when subjects were 14 years old (Alati et al., 2008).
Another longitudinal prospective study aimed to analyze the relative contribution of familial risk and prenatal exposure to substance use in offspring. This study was carried out with a sample of 209 third-generation offspring of families from the area of Pittsburgh, USA, specifically selected for being at either high or low risk of developing alcohol dependence (OāBrien and Hill, 2014). High-risk families were selected based on the presence of two alcohol-dependent sisters and low-risk families were selected on the basis of having a minimal number of first and second-degree relatives with alcohol dependence. The results of this study showed that prenatal alcohol exposure increased the risk of alcohol use disorders in both high and low-risk participants, although high-risk mothers were more likely to use alcohol and cigarettes during each trimester of pregnancy. In addition, it was reported that among the high-risk offspring, the effects of prenatal exposure were more specific to the particular substance exposed, i.e., prenatal alcohol exposure was associated with alcohol problems in offspring, while cigarette exposure was associated with cigarette use.
Another study analyzed the link between maternal self-reported alcohol consumption during pregnancy and adolescent self-reported drinking in a sample of 185 mothers and their first-borns recruited from the New York State Cohort (Griesler and Kandel, 1998). Maternal drinking was assessed retrospectively, at an average of 3.3 years after delivery, with reports covering a period of 18 months (including pregnancy). Adolescent (age 9ā17) life-time and current alcohol drinking data were obtained from self-reports. The results indicated that maternal alcohol drinking during pregnancyāparticularly moderate to heavy consumptionāwas associated with the current drinking of their female offspring. No association was found, however, between maternal drinking, either during or after pregnancy, and alcohol drinking in sons.
Finally, a fifth longitudinal study was conducted with participants from cohorts of the āMaternal Health Practices and Child Development Project.ā These participants were recruited between 1983 and 1986, also from Pittsburg, USA, and they have been followed since the fourth gestational month. The data from this study demonstrated that the level of adolescent drinking (at the age of 16) was directly predicted by prenatal alcohol exposure, as well as lower levels of parental strictness and exposure to maltreatment and violence during childhood (Cornelius et al., 2016). These authors also reported that heavier drinking during adolescence is directly predicted by maternal alcohol consumption during pregnancy. A similar relation between these variables was observed when analyzing data collected during young adulthood, at the age of 22 (Goldschmidt et al., 2019). The results of these studies, together with the one described previously, provide clear evidence of the direct connection between maternal and adolescent drinking, which not only includes alcohol dependence and alcohol-related problems.
In sum, the outcomes of all these studies support the existence of an association between prenatal alcohol exposure and either early onset of alcohol drinking and/or with the development of alcohol use disorders in adolescence and young adulthood. In addition, most of these studies highlight a critical role for prenatal alcohol exposure in the idea of a causal pathway that leads to alcohol use disorders. Several mechanisms have been proposed to underlie the link between prenatal alcohol exposure and these consequences, although research studies at this level have primarily been conducted with laboratory animals.
Evidence From Studies With Animals
Experimental studies with animals provide abundant evidence confirming the results found in humans i.e., prenatal exposure to alcoholāin addition to producing numerous harmful effectsāwill, in most cases, be followed by an increased acceptance (i.e., attraction and consumption) of alcohol. These effects have been reviewed comprehensively in previous publications in which the outcomes of numerous studies with rodents exposed prenatally and perinatally to alcohol are described and analyzed, focusing on the behavioral effects of prenatal exposure, and in particular, on the factors that play a role in the postnatal response to alcohol (Spear and Molina, 2005; Chotro et al., 2007; Abate et al., 2008). Table 1 includes the studies in rodents described in those reviews, as well as more recent publications, in which the effect of prenatal alcohol exposure on postnatal alcohol intake was assessed. As explained in those early reviews, increased alcohol intake has been observed after prenatal exposure to different doses of alcohol, ranging from relatively low to high alcohol concentrations. Those effects have been found in studies in which pregnant dams were given alcohol in a liquid diet made available for 24 h, as well as when alcohol was administered intragastrically in controlled amounts, modeling the so-called ābinge drinkingā of alcohol. In terms of the period of exposure, most of those studies show that exposure to alcohol during the entire gestation period of the rat (22 days), or only during the last 2 weeks, induces high alcohol consumption in the offspring. But even short binge-like exposures to relatively moderate alcohol doses, restricted to the final gestation days (GD 17ā20), have systematically resulted in heightened alcohol intake. These results have been observed at different postnatal stages, infancy, adolescence, and adulthood. In general, there are more studies reporting this increased alcohol intake effect when tested early in ontogeny than in adulthood. However, there are some showing that this effect can be directly detected in late adolescence and even in adulthood, although in some cases postnatal re-exposure to alcohol seems necessary. The importance of other factors such as sex, genetic differences, and stress conditions at testing, on the detection of an effect of increased alcohol intake after prenatal alcohol exposure, has also been thoroughly discussed in those reviews (Spear and Molina, 2005; Chotro et al., 2007; Abate et al., 2008).
Table 1
| Reference | Prenatal period | Alcohol dose | Sex and test age (PD) | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bond and Di Giusto (1976) | Whole gestation | Liquid diet with 6.5% (14 g/kg/day) | F56 and 70 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Phillips and Stainbrook (1976) | Whole gestation plus lactation up to weaning | Chablis wine as sole liquid source | F170 | Increased Chablis wine intake |
| Holloway and Tapp (1978) | GD 3 or 15 to PD 24, or to birth | Liquid diet 35% EDC | F-M28 and 70 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Abel and York (1979) | From GD 10 to birth | 1ā2 g/kg i.g. daily | F150 | No increase in alcohol intake |
| Buckalew (1979) | Whole gestation + lactation up to weaning | 5% as sole liquid source | F28 | Preference for alcohol over water |
| Randall et al. (1983) | GD 8ābirth | Liquid diet 28% EDC (26ā33 g/kg/day) | F-M25 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Nelson et al. (1983) | Whole gestation | Not specified | F-M100 | Increased alcohol intake, but under stress |
| Nash et al. (1984) | Whole gestation | 10% as sole liquid source | M90 | Increased alcohol intake |
| McGivern et al. (1984) | GD 7ābirth | Liquid diet 35% EDC (14 g/kg/ day) | F-M120 | No increase in alcohol intake |
| Reyes et al. (1985) | Whole gestation | Liquid diet 20.9 EDC (16.85 g/kg/day) | F-M45 | No increase in alcohol intake |
| Grace et al. (1986) | Either weeks 1, 2, 3, or whole gestation | 2.8ā3.5 g/kg/day | F-Maprox. 120 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Hilakivi (1986) | Whole gestation | 7% on weeks 1ā2, and 12%, on week 3, as sole liquid source | M64 | No increase in alcohol intake |
| Hilakivi et al. (1987) | Whole gestation | 5% on week 1 and 10% on weeks 2ā3 | M90 | Increased alcohol intake in ANA but not in AA rats |
| Molina et al. (1987) | GD 8 | Two i.p. injections, 2.82 g/kg with 4 hāinterval | F-M65ā75 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Lancaster and Spiegel (1989) | Whole gestation | Beer (50 ml/day or more, 9ā11 g/kg/day) | F-M85 | Increased beer intake |
| Molina et al. (1995) | GDs 17ā20 | 1 or 2 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M15 | Increased alcohol intake |
| DomĆnguez et al. (1998) | GDs 17ā20 | 1 or 2 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M14 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Honey and Galef (2003) | GD 7ābirth | 4% as sole liquid source | F-M26 | Increased alcohol intake, but only if exposed on weaning |
| Chotro and Arias (2003) | GD 17ā20 | 1 or 2 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M15 and 28 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Arias and Chotro (2005a) | GD 17ā20 | 2 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M14ā15 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Arias and Chotro (2005b) | GD 17ā20 | 2 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M14ā15 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Pueta et al. (2005) | GD 17ā20 | 2 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M15ā16 | Increased alcohol intake, but only if exposed on lactation |
| McMurray et al. (2008) | GD 5ā20 | Liquid diet 35% EDC + nicotine | F-M30ā60 | Increased alcohol intake, but only in female rats |
| Chotro et al. (2009) | GD 17ā20 | 3 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M9ā10 or 12ā13 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Youngentob and Glendinning (2009) | GD 11ā20 | Liquid diet 35% EDC | F-M30 and 90 | Increased alcohol intake |
| DĆaz-Cenzano and Chotro (2010) | GD 17ā18 or GD 19ā20 | 2 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M14 and 26ā27 | Increased alcohol intake in subjects exposed on GD 19ā20 |
| Shea et al. (2012) | Preāpregnancy Whole gestation | 5% + 1 g/l sucralose as sole liquid source | F-M40ā45 to 70 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Youngentob et al. (2012) | GD 6ā10 or GD 11ā20 | 6.7% as sole liquid source | F-M12ā14 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Abate et al. (2014) | GD 17ā20 | 2 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M14ā15 | Increased alcohol intake, particularly in females |
| DĆaz-Cenzano et al. (2014) | GD 19ā20 | 2 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M14 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Nizhnikov et al. (2014) | GD 17ā20 | 1 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M14ā15 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Miranda-Morales et al. (2014) | GD 17ā20 | 1 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M5 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Fabio et al. (2015) | GD 17ā20 | 2 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M37ā62 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Nizhnikov et al. (2016) | GD 17ā20 | 1 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M14 (F1, F2 and F3) | Increased alcohol intake on all generations |
| GaztaƱaga et al. (2017) | GD 17ā20 | 2 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M14 | Increased alcohol intake |
| Biggio et al. (2018) | GD 17ā20 | 1 g/kg i.g. daily | M30ā85 or 90ā145 | No increase in alcohol intake, but alcohol preference after maternal separation |
| FernĆ”ndez et al. (2019) | Whole gestation + postnatal week 1 | 10% sole liquid source 22 h/day + water 2 h/day | M56ā84 | Increased alcohol intake from first testing trials, and potentiates isolation effects on alcohol intake |
| Gore-Langton and Spear (2019) | GD 17ā20 | 2 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M35 and 56ā60 | Increased alcohol intake in adolescent and adult males |
| Wille-Bille et al. (2020) | GD 17ā20 | 2 g/kg i.g. daily | F-M30ā50 | Increased alcohol intake and preference, but only males reared in enriched environment |
Studies in rodents measuring alcohol intake after prenatal alcohol exposure.
GD, gestational day; PD, postnatal day; i.g., intragastric; F, females; M, males.
During the last decade, new studies showing evidence of an increased intake of alcohol following prenatal alcohol exposure in rodents have been added to those reviewed previously. Among all of this literature, those studies proposing and testing possible mechanisms by which fetal exposure to alcohol may increase the avidity for this drug are of particular interest for this review.
Possible Mechanisms
On the basis of the results found in animal studies, a number of different mechanisms have been proposed to explain the increased consumption of alcohol that is observed following prenatal alcohol exposure. Some propose an indirect link between high alcohol consumption and other alterations induced by prenatal alcohol exposure, while others suggest more direct pathways between prenatal alcohol consumption and an increased acceptance of the drug.
Indirect Mechanisms
Genetic differences may lead to differences in susceptibility to the teratogenic effects of alcohol. For example, in a study using two lines of rats selected to differ in alcohol intake (AA, alcohol-preferring, and ANA, alcohol avoiding rats) prenatal alcohol exposure was found to differentially affect voluntary alcohol consumption (Hilakivi et al., 1987). This difference was explained by differences in alcohol metabolism between both ratlines. However, the authors did not offer any explanation for the connection between this differential susceptibility to the teratogenic effects of alcohol and the increased alcohol consumption. Epigenetic alterations have also been proposed as a mechanism by which prenatal alcohol exposure results in increased alcohol intake. The transgenerational transmission of the effects induced by prenatal alcohol exposure was investigated in a study including three generations of rats (Nizhnikov et al., 2016). Pregnant rats were administered with 1 g/kg of alcohol from GD 17ā20, and the offspring of the first generation (F1) was tested in terms of alcohol intake and sensitivity to alcohol-induced sedation in comparison with water-exposed or untreated subjects. These F1 subjects were mated and their descendants (F2) were tested on those same measures and subsequently used to produce F3, which was also tested. The results of these tests revealed that alcohol intake increased in all three generations and that the effects on sedation were observed in F1 and F2, but not in F3. On the basis of previous research (Popoola et al., 2015), differences in maternal care were ruled out as a cause of this transgenerational transmission of the altered response to alcohol. However, in the discussion of the results, no alternative mechanisms were proposed to explain the interesting results observed in the F2 and F3 subjects. Transcript and epigenetic changes as a consequence of prenatal alcohol exposure have been described in several studies with animals (for a complete review, see Comasco et al., 2018), and these epigenetic modifications could underlie the results of the study conducted by Nizhnikov et al. (2016). Exploration of the mechanisms linking these genomic alterations and the increase in alcohol intake in subjects prenatally exposed to alcohol constitutes an interesting research topic that requires rigorous investigation. Recently, preliminary steps have been taken to clarify this issue with a study analyzing the protective effects of environmental enrichment upon modulation of gene expression, the anxiety response, and alcohol intake produced by prenatal alcohol exposure (Wille-Bille et al., 2020). The results showed that prenatal alcohol-induced upregulation in the kappa opioid receptor system mRNA levels in the amygdala, as well as prodynorphin mRNA levels in the ventral tegmental area, with the latter effect being linked to lower DNA methylation at the gene promoter. These effects were normalized by postnatal environmental enrichment manipulations. In addition, environmental enrichment also had a protective effect on alcohol intake, this effect being more marked in males than in females.
Prenatal alcohol has been found to alter the normal development of the neurochemical systems. Based on data showing that voluntary alcohol intake is partially regulated by the activity of the monoaminergic system (Ericson et al., 1998; Gonzales and Weiss, 1998) and that the acquisition of alcohol consumption habits is mediated by the dopaminergic mesencephalic system (Gianoulakis, 2001), it has been proposed that the altered alcohol intake after prenatal exposure is due to alterations in this system. Prenatal alcohol exposure has been observed to affect the development of the dopaminergic system (Shen et al., 1999; Aghaie et al., 2019), inducing, for example, hyperactivity (Cheng et al., 2018) together with sensitivity to the stimulant effects of alcohol (Becker et al., 1993; Barbier et al., 2009). These effects, together with other physiological and behavioral effects, have been linked to increased alcohol consumption in subjects prenatally exposed to alcohol.
Other neurochemical systems that have been shown to be related to motivational aspects of alcohol consumption, either directly or indirectly, and that are affected by alcohol exposure are GABA, serotonin, and the opioid system (Alfonso-Loeches and Guerri, 2011). Specifically, it has been demonstrated that the opioid system is involved in the increased alcohol intake observed in subjects exposed prenatally to a relatively low alcohol dose (1 g/kg; Nizhnikov et al., 2014). In this study, it was observed that prenatal alcohol exposure, in addition to increased alcohol intake in the offspring, induced changes in the kappa opioid receptor system. In particular, a decrease in synaptosomal kappa-opioid receptor expression was found in brain areas implicated in the response to alcohol. The authors suggest that these changes in kappa-opioid function and expression are involved in the enhanced postnatal alcohol intake observed following prenatal exposure.
Differences in the response to stress have been proposed as an alternative way to explain the increased consumption of alcohol following prenatal exposure. Some studies have linked stress and alcohol consumption via alterations in the development of the HPA-axis and the pituitary Ć-endorphin system (Prasad and Prasad, 1995; Fahlke et al., 2000; Nash and Maickel, 2013). For instance, in one study, prenatal alcohol exposure was found to induce higher alcohol intake, but only when rats were tested after chronic stress (Nelson et al., 1983). Interestingly, in most studies, alcohol intake is tested in conditions of isolation, a stressful situation for rats that could facilitate the observation of differential effects of alcohol consumption. Prolonged isolation housing during early development has also been shown to induce augmented alcohol intake in rodents (Lopez et al., 2011; Kutcher et al., 2016). Additionally, in one study it was found that this heightened alcohol intake was facilitated in adolescent males exposed to alcohol during gestation and the first week of lactation (FernĆ”ndez et al., 2019). In that case, males pre- and postnatally exposed to alcohol showed significantly higher alcohol intake and increased alcohol preference in comparison with non-exposed controls during the first 5ā6 testing sessions, but only if they had been housed in isolation conditions from weaning.
The anxiolytic effects of alcohol have also been considered as an explanation for the high alcohol consumption observed during stressful situations, particularly in adolescence (Spear and Molina, 2005). Recently, it has been found that adolescent rats exposed prenatally to alcohol were more sensitive to the social facilitation and anxiolytic effects of acute alcohol (Mooney and Varlinskaya, 2018). Another study examined the combined effects of prenatal alcohol exposure and postnatal maternal separation on HPA responsiveness, anxiety behavior, and alcohol intake, in male offspring (Biggio et al., 2018). The results of this study revealed that male subjects exposed prenatally to alcohol (1 g/kg) did not display an increased intake or preference for alcohol in comparison with non-exposed subjects or those that experienced only maternal separation. Maternal separation by itself was found to increase intake of low concentrations of alcohol, whereas adult males subjected to both treatments āprenatal alcohol and maternal separationādisplayed an increase in anxiety-related behavior and an increased preference for alcohol at either low or high concentrations. The failure to observe an effect on alcohol intake in males following prenatal alcohol exposure is in accordance with the findings of another study in which a sex-dependent result was found after alcohol prenatal exposure, as a function of alcohol dose and age of testing (Chotro and Arias, 2003). This study found that whilst at infancy both males and females exposed prenatally to either 1 or 2 g/kg alcohol showed increased alcohol intake, at adolescence, only males exposed to the higher dose and females exposed to the 1 g/kg dose drank more alcohol than non-exposed subjects. It is possible that an increase in the effect of alcohol consumption might have been observed in the study by Biggio et al. (2018) if the female siblings had been included in the test.
Learning Mechanisms
Other mechanisms proposed to account for the heightened alcohol intake observed after prenatal exposure are based on the notion that the fetus may learn about different aspects of alcohol during exposure in the amniotic environment and this may have an impact on the postnatal response to the drug. Both human and animal fetuses detect chemosensory stimuli that enter the amniotic fluid from the maternal diet, and it has been shown that this experience may change the subsequent response to those flavors (Faas et al., 2000; Schaal et al., 2000; Mennella et al., 2001). Rat fetuses in the final days of gestation (GD 17 to birth) can acquire and express basic forms of non-associative and associative learning (Smotherman, 1982; Smotherman, 2002a,b; Stickrod et al., 1982; Smotherman and Robinson, 1985, 1988a,b; Gruest et al., 2004). Alcohol is one of those substances with chemosensory properties that is able to cross the placenta with ease and reaches not only the fetal tissues but also accumulates in the amniotic fluid, from where it is slowly eliminated (Chotro et al., 2009; Burd et al., 2012). Therefore, after maternal alcohol ingestion, the fetus is exposed to the flavor of alcohol as well as its pharmacological effects. Some studies explain postnatal increased alcohol intake in terms of a mere stimulus exposure effect, that is, familiarity with the alcohol flavor, or habituation to neophobia, which facilitates the initial acceptance of the particular chemosensory aspects of alcohol (Spear and Molina, 2005; DĆaz-Cenzano and Chotro, 2010). However, this mechanism alone is not sufficient to explain the increased alcohol consumption observed when subjects are tested repeatedly and/or after a long period after the prenatal experience (Fabio et al., 2015; GaztaƱaga et al., 2015).
Associative Learning Mechanisms
A mechanism that has been broadly investigated and has obtained abundant support in the last two decades, is one that links increased alcohol consumption to fetal associative learning about alcohol (Chotro and Arias, 2003; Arias and Chotro, 2005a,b, 2006; Chotro et al., 2007, 2009; DĆaz-Cenzano and Chotro, 2010; Miranda-Morales et al., 2010; Youngentob et al., 2012; DĆaz-Cenzano et al., 2014; Bordner and Deak, 2015; GaztaƱaga et al., 2015). The working hypothesis of most of these studies begins with the assumption that the fetus acquires an appetitive conditioned response to alcohol by the formation of an association between the flavor of alcohol (the conditioned stimulus) and its pharmacological effects (the reinforcer).
The Role of the Opioid System
With regard to the pharmacological effects of alcohol, several studies have explored the implied role of the endogenous opioid system. This neurochemical system is known to play an important role in alcohol consumption behaviors (Gianoulakis, 2001, 2004) and in the mediation of the reinforcing effects of alcohol, particularly the mu-opioid receptor system (Acquas et al., 1993; Stromberg et al., 1998; Gianoulakis, 2001; Molina-MartĆnez and JuĆ”rez, 2020). Based on this body of evidence, the reinforcing properties of alcohol during gestation were tested by manipulating the prenatal opioid system. The results of several studies have shown that blocking the opioid receptor system with a non-selective antagonist (naloxone or naltrexone) during prenatal alcohol exposure prevented the observation of the increased alcohol intake effect in the offspring (for example, Chotro and Arias, 2003; Youngentob et al., 2012).
The fetal opioid system has also been found to be activated by the amniotic fluid, in the absence of alcohol. It has been proposed that the amniotic fluid contains a substance that stimulates the kappa-opioid receptors, known as KIF (kappa inducing factor), which is functional in the last two gestational days (GD 20ā21; MĆ©ndez-Gallardo and Robinson, 2010). These researchers suggested that KIF could be the agent that mediates the preferences acquired by flavors experienced prenatally in the amniotic fluid, including the enhanced acceptance of alcohol observed after prenatal exposure to this drug. This hypothesis was tested in further studies in our laboratory. Taking into account that activity of KIF has been reported to start at around GD 20, the prenatal administration of alcohol prior to these days (GDs 17ā18) would not be expected to produce the effect of increased intake, whereas this would be observed when alcohol exposure occurs on the following days (GDs 19ā20). The results appear to support the hypothesis that KIF, and therefore, the stimulation of kappa-opioid receptors, could play an important role as the reinforcer in this prenatal learning (DĆaz-Cenzano and Chotro, 2010). In a second study, this hypothesis was tested from a more unambiguous perspective. Considering that KIF acts directly on kappa-opioid receptors, while the reinforcing effects of alcohol are mediated by the stimulation of mu-opioid receptors, the reinforcing effects of the amniotic fluid (with KIF) and alcohol were assessed by using specific antagonists for each receptor system. The results demonstrated that when prenatally blocking mu-opioid receptors during alcohol exposure, the usually observed effect of increased postnatal consumption of alcohol was completely abolished. However, the blockage of the kappa-opioid receptor system did not abolish this effect. These results allow us to rule out the possibility that the proposed effects of the amniotic fluid (and KIF) on the opioid system is the positive reinforcer responsible for the appetitive conditioned response. The pharmacological effects of alcohol on the mu-opioid receptor system were instead found to be critical for observing the increased consumption of alcohol after prenatal exposure (DĆaz-Cenzano et al., 2014). Coincidently, an increase in the activity of mu-opioid receptors in the ventral tegmental area was reported after prenatal alcohol exposure, together with augmented alcohol intake in adolescence (Fabio et al., 2015).
Acetaldehyde as the Reinforcer
Once this was confirmed, further research aimed to clarify whether the reinforcer responsible for the activation of the opioid system is either alcohol itself or its first metabolite acetaldehyde. A growing body of research indicates that many of the deleterious effects of alcohol on gestation are actually produced by acetaldehyde (Sreenathan et al., 1982; Webster et al., 1983; Eriksson, 2001). As mentioned previously, during gestation alcohol freely crosses the placenta, reaching all fetal tissues to the same extent as maternal blood, including the brain (Zorzano and Herrera, 1989). From there, alcohol is eliminated, mostly unchanged, through maternal metabolism (Clarke et al., 1986). Fetal alcohol hepatic capacity is minimal or null, and therefore peripheral acetaldehyde is not produced by the fetus, while acetaldehyde produced by the maternal liver does not cross the placenta (Heller and Burd, 2014). However, in the fetal brain, acetaldehyde is produced in abundance from alcohol, mainly by the catalase system (Hamby-Mason et al., 1997). Several studies have demonstrated the important role of acetaldehyde in the pharmacological and behavioral effects of alcohol. It has also been found that acetaldehyde produced in the peripheral circulation (in the liver) and centrally (in the brain) have distinct and opposing behavioral effects: peripheral acetaldehyde induces aversive effects (Quertemont and Tambour, 2004) whereas central acetaldehyde is involved in the reinforcing appetitive properties of alcohol (for a review, see Hahn et al., 2006; Correa et al., 2012). Hence, the balance between peripheral and central acetaldehyde derived from alcohol consumption may be critical in determining the perceived effect of alcohol intoxication and may influence further intake of this drug.
Based on all of these facts related to alcohol metabolism, some studies have assessed the role of acetaldehyde on the increased alcohol consumption observed following its prenatal administration. In the infant and newborn rat, it has been found that acetaldehyde produced from alcohol by catalases in the brain is responsible for the reinforcing effects of alcohol (Nizhnikov et al., 2007; March et al., 2013a,b). The participation of centrally produced acetaldehyde has also been investigated in the prenatal period by administering to the pregnant rat the acetaldehyde sequestering agent D-Penicillamine together with alcohol. The results show that in the absence of acetaldehyde prenatal alcohol, exposure does not induce an increase in postnatal alcohol consumption. These results confirmed that acetaldehyde, and not alcohol, is the main reinforcer and that its production is critical for the occurrence of prenatal appetitive learning about alcohol (GaztaƱaga et al., 2017; Chotro et al., 2019). Considering the outcomes of these studies, it could be hypothesized that the reinforcing properties of prenatal alcohol are produced by central acetaldehyde, which in turn stimulates the endogenous opioid system. This hypothesis is supported by studies showing that the reinforcing effects of acetaldehyde produced in the brain from alcohol may be mediated by the Ī¼-opioid receptor system, and acetaldehyde has been found to stimulate the release of Ć-endorphins (Font et al., 2013; Xie et al., 2013). In addition, the condensation product of acetaldehyde and dopamine, salsolinol (Ito et al., 2018), has been found in the fetal brain following chronic prenatal alcohol exposure (Mao et al., 2013). Salsolinol has been shown to be involved in the motivational effects of alcohol and its high intake and produces its effect by interacting with the Ī¼-opioid receptors in the posterior ventral tegmental area (Xie et al., 2012; Quintanilla et al., 2014; Peana et al., 2017), Therefore, the monoamine system appears to be directly implicated in the reinforcing effects of alcohol, and, consequently in prenatal learning about alcohol; although the role of this system has not yet been fully investigated. This could yet prove to be the missing link between the reinforcing action of acetaldehyde and the activation of the opioid system.
The appetitive learning acquired in utero after alcohol exposure can also account for the increased preference or enhanced behavioral response to the odor of alcohol observed from newborns to adult rats (Youngentob et al., 2007; Eade et al., 2009, 2010; Middleton et al., 2009; March et al., 2013b; GaztaƱaga et al., 2015). Interestingly, similar results have been reported in humans. For example, the newborns of mothers who frequently consumed alcohol during gestation responded to alcohol odor with more appetitive facial reactions than babies from control mothers who were infrequent consumers (Faas et al., 2000, 2015). In another study, it was found that young adults with prenatal history of alcohol exposure rated alcohol odor as more pleasant than non-exposed control subjects (Hannigan et al., 2015).
In addition to the enhanced response to alcohol odor, the prenatal experience has been observed to increase the reinforcing capacity of alcohol in operant conditioning tasks (March et al., 2009; Miranda-Morales et al., 2010; GaztaƱaga et al., 2015); and has also been shown to interact with postnatal conditioning, potentiating appetitive learning about alcohol and retarding the acquisition of an aversion to this substance (Arias and Chotro, 2006; Chotro et al., 2009). The enhanced appetitive reinforcing properties of alcohol, together with the development of tolerance and reduced sensitivity to alcoholās aversive effects, have also been proposed as mechanisms by which prenatal alcohol may lead to high postnatal alcohol consumption (Arias et al., 2008; Pautassi et al., 2012; Fabio et al., 2015; Gore-Langton and Spear, 2019).
These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and the consistent outcomes of all the studies cited here suggest that they could be acting simultaneously to generate the augmented alcohol intake response systematically observed after exposure to alcohol during gestation. The increased alcohol intake described in many studies with human subjects exposed prenatally to alcohol may be partially explained by these same mechanisms that have been experimentally studied with rodents. For instance, those studies in which alcohol odor elicited positive reactions in subjects with prenatal alcohol exposure seem to support the idea of an appetitive response to alcohol acquired before birth (Faas et al., 2000, 2015; Hannigan et al., 2015).
Concluding Comments and Future Directions
After reviewing all of the evidence from controlled experimental studies with animals, the connection between prenatal alcohol exposure and augmented alcohol intake during infancy, adolescence, and even adulthood appears to be clear. This link suggests that prenatal alcohol exposure increases the probability of early onset of alcohol use, which in turn has been described as a strong predictor of alcohol dependence (Grant, 1998). Although the causal relationship between adolescent-onset and adult alcohol use is still under debate (Prescott and Kendler, 1999), it is clear that adolescence is a vulnerable period for the neurobehavioral effects of alcohol (Spear, 2000, 2015). Unlike what occurs in adult subjects, initiation of alcohol use in adolescence has been found to accelerate the course of alcohol dependence, without the need for a long history of alcohol consumption (Clark et al., 1998; Spear, 2002). Therefore, any situation that favors the initiation of alcohol use during this period of development, such as stress or prenatal alcohol exposure, can be considered a risk factor for later alcohol use and misuse.
Thus, understanding the mechanisms by which prenatal alcohol exposure favors the early initiation of alcohol consumption may allow us to find strategies to mitigate the behavioral effects of this fetal experience. Moreover, it would be interesting to consider prenatal alcohol exposure as a case of involuntary early onset of alcohol use when designing prevention policies. This is particularly important if we assume that (as indicated by the longitudinal studies reviewed here), the sooner that alcohol intake begins, the greater the possibility of a long history of alcohol consumption and hence, the higher the likelihood of developing an alcohol use disorder.
Given these considerations, it is clear that more clinical and preclinical research is needed to explore prenatal alcohol exposure as a causal pathway leading to alcohol disorders in adolescence and adulthood. As discussed in this review, it has been well established that prenatal learning about the sensory and pharmacological properties of alcohol is a mechanism that plays an important role in facilitating the early onset of alcohol consumption. The opioid system has been found to mediate this prenatal learning, in which acetaldehyde acts as the main appetitive reinforcer. Future research should aim to find the link between acetaldehyde and the activation of the opioid system, with the dopaminergic system and/or salsolinol being the main candidates for this role. In addition to fetal alcohol learning, other identified coexistent and interacting mechanisms undoubtedly need to be investigated in more depth. For instance, stress is a factor that interacts with prenatal exposure to alcohol, facilitating in many cases the observed increase in alcohol intake in the exposed offspring. Further research is also needed to identify the causal processes by which prenatal alcohol-induced alterations in the activity of the HPA-axis drive the subject to consume more alcohol. Furthermore, it would be interesting to continue elucidating the role of the anxiolytic effects of alcohol on the increased intake response observed in subjects prenatally exposed to alcohol. Finally, the mechanistic connection between epigenetic modifications induced by prenatal alcohol exposure and the resulting changes in alcohol intake remains an underexplored but promising field of research, which needs to be addressed through rigorous research. In this regard, the first steps have already been taken, as shown, for example, in the results of a study already mentioned in this review (Wille-Bille et al., 2020).
Statements
Author contributions
MG, AA-A, and MC contributed equally to manuscript writing, revision, read and approved of the submitted version.
Funding
The research has been funded by the Basque Government (IT1341-19) to the research group (PI: Gabriel Rodriguez San Juan).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbateP.HernĆ”ndez-FonsecaK.Reyes-GuzmĆ”nA. C.Barbosa-LunaI. G.MĆ©ndezM. (2014). Prenatal ethanol exposure alters met-enkephalin expression in brain regions related with reinforcement: possible mechanism for ethanol consumption in offspring. Behav. Brain Res.274, 194ā204. 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.08.022
2
AbateP.PuetaM.SpearN. E.MolinaJ. C. (2008). Fetal learning about ethanol and later ethanol responsiveness: evidence against āsafeā amounts of prenatal exposure. Exp. Biol. Med.233, 139ā154. 10.3181/0703-mr-69
3
AbelE. L.YorkL. (1979). Absence of effect of prenatal ethanol on adult emotionality and ethanol consumption in rats. J. Stud. Alcohol40, 547ā553. 10.15288/jsa.1979.40.547
4
AcquasE.MeloniM.Di ChiaraG. (1993). Blockade of Ī“-opioid receptors in the nucleus accumbens prevents ethanol-induced stimulation of dopamine release. Eur. J. Pharmacol.230, 239ā241. 10.1016/0014-2999(93)90809-v
5
AghaieC. I.HausknechtK. A.WangR.DezfuliP. H.Haj-DahmaneS.KaneC. J. M.et al. (2019). Prenatal ethanol exposure and postnatal environmental intervention alter dopaminergic neuron and microglia morphology in the ventral tegmental area during adulthood. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1111/acer.14275
6
AlatiR.Al MamunA.WilliamsG. M.OāCallaghanM.NajmanJ. M.BorW. (2006). In utero alcohol exposure and prediction of alcohol disorders in early adulthood: a birth cohort study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry63, 1009ā1016. 10.1001/archpsyc.63.9.1009
7
AlatiR.ClavarinoA.NajmanJ. M.OāCallaghanM.BorW.MamunA. A.et al. (2008). The developmental origin of adolescent alcohol use: findings from the mater university study of pregnancy and its outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend.98, 136ā143. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.05.011
8
Alfonso-LoechesS.GuerriC. (2011). Molecular and behavioral aspects of the actions of alcohol on the adult and developing brain. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci.48, 19ā47. 10.3109/10408363.2011.580567
9
AriasC.ChotroM. G. (2005a). Increased palatability of ethanol after prenatal ethanol exposure is mediated by the opioid system. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.82, 434ā442. 10.1016/j.pbb.2005.09.015
10
AriasC.ChotroM. G. (2005b). Increased preference for ethanol in the infant rat after prenatal ethanol exposure, expressed on intake and taste reactivity tests. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.29, 337ā346. 10.1097/01.alc.0000156115.35817.21
11
AriasC.ChotroM. G. (2006). Interactions between prenatal ethanol exposure and postnatal learning about ethanol in rat pups. Alcohol40, 51ā59. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2006.10.002
12
AriasC.MolinaJ. C.MlewskiE. C.PautassiR. M.SpearN. (2008). Acute sensitivity and acute tolerance to ethanol in preweanling rats with or without prenatal experience with the drug. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.89, 608ā622. 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.02.017
13
AstleyS. J.AylwardE. H.OlsonH. C.KernsK.BrooksA.CogginsT. E.et al. (2009). Magnetic resonance imaging outcomes from a comprehensive magnetic resonance study of children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.33, 1671ā1689. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01004.x
14
BaerJ. S.BarrH. M.BooksteinF. L.SampsonP. D.StreissguthA. P. (1998). Prenatal alcohol exposure and family history of alcoholism in the etiology of adolescent alcohol problems. J. Stud. Alcohol59, 533ā543. 10.15288/jsa.1998.59.533
15
BaerJ. S.SampsonP. D.BarrH. M.ConnorP. D.StreissguthA. P. (2003). A 21-year longitudinal analysis of the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on young adult drinking. Arch. Gene. Psychiatry60, 377ā385. 10.1001/archpsyc.60.4.377
16
BarbierE.HouchiH.WarnaultV.PierreficheO.DaoustM.NaassilaM. (2009). Effects of prenatal and postnatal maternal ethanol on offspring response to alcohol and psychostimulants in long evans rats. Neuroscience161, 427ā440. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.076
17
BeckerH. C.HaleR. L.BogganW. O.RandallC. L. (1993). Effects of prenatal ethanol exposure on later sensitivity to the low-dose stimulant actions of ethanol in mouse offspring: possible role of catecholamines. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.17, 1325ā1336. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb05249.x
18
BiggioF.TalaniG.LocciV.PisuM. G.BoeroG.CiarloB.et al. (2018). Low doses of prenatal ethanol exposure and maternal separation alter HPA axis function and ethanol consumption in adult male rats. Neuropharmacology131, 271ā281. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.12.005
19
BondN. W.Di GiustoE. L. (1976). Effects of prenatal alcohol consumption on open-field behaviour and alcohol preference in rats. Psychopharmacologia46, 163ā165. 10.1007/bf00421386
20
BordnerK.DeakT. (2015). Endogenous opioids as substrates for ethanol intake in the neonatal rat: the impact of prenatal ethanol exposure on the opioid family in the early postnatal period. Physiol. Behav.148, 100ā110. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.02.013
21
BuckalewL. W. (1979). Alcohol preference, housing effect and bottle position effect in maternally-exposed offspring. Addict. Behav.4, 275ā277. 10.1016/0306-4603(79)90040-6
22
BurdL.BlairJ.DroppsK. (2012). Prenatal alcohol exposure, blood alcohol concentrations and alcohol elimination rates for the mother, fetus and newborn. J. Perinatol.32, 652ā659. 10.1038/jp.2012.57
23
ChengY.WangX.WeiX.XieX.MeloS.MirandaR. C.et al. (2018). Prenatal exposure to alcohol induces functional and structural plasticity in dopamine d1 receptor-expressing neurons of the dorsomedial striatum. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.42, 1493ā1502. 10.1111/acer.13806
24
ChotroM. G.AriasC. (2003). Prenatal exposure to ethanol increases ethanol consumption: a conditioned response?Alcohol30, 19ā28. 10.1016/s0741-8329(03)00037-5
25
ChotroM. G.AriasC.LaviolaG. (2007). Increased ethanol intake after prenatal ethanol exposure: studies with animals. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.31, 181ā191. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.021
26
ChotroM. G.AriasC.SpearN. E. (2009). Binge ethanol exposure in late gestation induces ethanol aversion in the dam but enhances ethanol intake in the offspring and affects their postnatal learning about ethanol. Alcohol43, 453ā463. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2009.08.001
27
ChotroM. G.GaztaƱagaM.Angulo-AlcaldeA. (2019). āConnecting prenatal alcohol, its metabolite acetaldehyde and the fetal brain,ā in Neuroscience of Alcohol: Mechanisms and Treatment, ed. PreedyV. R. (London, UK: Academic Press), 81ā88.
28
ClarkD. B.KirisciL.TarterR. E. (1998). Adolescent versus adult onset and the development of substance use disorders in males. Drug Alcohol Depend.49, 115ā121. 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00154-3
29
ClarkeD. W.SteenaartN. A. E.BrienJ. F. (1986). Disposition of ethanol and activity of hepatic and placental alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenases in the third-trimester pregnant guinea pig for single and short-term oral ethanol administration. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.10, 330ā336. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1986.tb05099.x
30
ComascoE.RangmarJ.ErikssonU. J.OrelandL. (2018). Neurological and neuropsychological effects of low and moderate prenatal alcohol exposure. Acta Physiol.222, 1ā18. 10.1111/apha.12892
31
CorneliusM. D.De GennaN. M.GoldschmidtL.LarkbyC.DayN. L. (2016). Prenatal alcohol and other early childhood adverse exposures: direct and indirect pathways to adolescent drinking. Neurotoxicol. Teratol.55, 8ā15. 10.1016/j.ntt.2016.03.001
32
CorreaM.SalamoneJ. D.SegoviaK. N.PardoM.LongoniR.SpinaL.et al. (2012). Piecing together the puzzle of acetaldehyde as a neuroactive agent. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.36, 404ā430. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.009
33
DĆaz-CenzanoE.ChotroM. G. (2010). Prenatal binge ethanol exposure on gestation days 19ā20, but not on days 17ā18, increases postnatal ethanol acceptance in rats. Behav. Neurosci.124, 362ā369. 10.1037/a0019482
34
DĆaz-CenzanoE.GaztaƱagaM.ChotroM. G. (2014). Exposure to ethanol on prenatal days 19ā20 increases ethanol intake and palatability in the infant rat: involvement of kappa and mu opioid receptors. Dev. Psychobiol.56, 1167ā1178. 10.1002/dev.21162
35
DomĆnguezH. D.LĆ³pezM. F.MolinaJ. C. (1998). Neonatal responsiveness to alcohol odor and infant alcohol intake as a function of alcohol experience during late gestation. Alcohol16, 109ā117. 10.1016/s0741-8329(97)00169-9
36
EadeA. M.SheeheP. R.YoungentobS. L. (2010). Ontogeny of the enhanced fetal-ethanol-induced behavioral and neurophysiologic olfactory response to ethanol odor. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.34, 206ā213. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01083.x
37
EadeA. M.SheeheP. R.MolinaJ. C.SpearN. E.YoungentobL. M.YoungentobS. L. (2009). The consequence of fetal ethanol exposure and adolescent odor re-exposure on the response to ethanol odor in adolescent and adult rats. Behav. Brain Funct.5, 1ā13. 10.1186/1744-9081-5-3
38
EricsonM.BlomqvistO.EngelJ. A.SƶderpalmB. (1998). Voluntary ethanol intake in the rat and the associated accumbal dopamine overflow are blocked by ventral tegmental mecamylamine. Eur. J. Pharmacol.358, 189ā196. 10.1016/s0014-2999(98)00602-5
39
ErikssonC. J. P. (2001). The role of acetaldehyde in the actions of alcohol (update 2000). Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.25, 15Sā32S. 10.1097/00000374-200105051-00005
40
FaasA. E.MarchS. M.MoyaP. R.MolinaJ. C. (2015). Alcohol odor elicits appetitive facial expressions in human neonates prenatally exposed to the drug. Physiol. Behav.148, 78ā86. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.02.031
41
FaasA. E.SpontĆ³nE. D.MoyaP. R.MolinaJ. C. (2000). Differential responsiveness to alcohol odor in human neonates: efects of maternal consumption during gestation. Alcohol22, 7ā17. 10.1016/s0741-8329(00)00103-8
42
FabioM. C.MacchioneA. F.NizhnikovM. E.PautassiR. M. (2015). Prenatal ethanol increases ethanol intake throughout adolescence, alters ethanol-mediated aversive learning and affects Ī¼ but not Ī“ or Īŗ opioid receptor mRNA expression. Front. Neurosci.41, 1569ā1579. 10.1111/ejn.12913
43
FahlkeC.LorenzJ. G.LongJ.ChampouxM.SuomiS. J.HigleyJ. D. (2000). Rearing experiences and stress-induced plasma cortisol as early risk factors for excessive alcohol consumption in nonhuman primates. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.24, 644ā650. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02035.x
44
FernĆ”ndezM. S.CarrizoJ.PlazaW.HaegerP.PautassiR. M. (2019). Prenatal ethanol exposure potentiates isolation-induced ethanol consumption in young adult rats. Alcohol75, 39ā46. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.05.006
45
FontL.LujĆ”nM. Ć.PastorR. (2013). Involvement of the endogenous opioid system in the psychopharmacological actions of ethanol: the role of acetaldehyde. Front. Behav. Neurosci.7, 1ā10. 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00093
46
GaztaƱagaM.Angulo-AlcaldeA.SpearN. E.ChotroM. G. (2017). The role of acetaldehyde in the increased acceptance of ethanol after prenatal ethanol exposure. Front. Behav. Neurosci.11:14. 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00014
47
GaztaƱagaM.Aranda-FernĆ”ndezP. E.ChotroM. G. (2015). Prenatal exposure to vanilla or alcohol induces crawling after these odors in the neonate rat: the role of mu and kappa opioid receptor systems. Physiol. Behav.148, 58ā64. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.12.046
48
GianoulakisC. (2001). Influence of the endogenous opioid system on high alcohol consumption and genetic predisposition to alcoholism. J. Psychiatry Neurosci.26, 304ā318. 10.2331/suisan.58.1751
49
GianoulakisC. (2004). Endogenous opioids and addiction to alcohol and other drugs of abuse. Curr. Top. Med. Chem.4, 39ā50. 10.2174/1568026043451573
50
GoldschmidtL.RichardsonG. A.De GennaN. M.CorneliusM. D.DayN. L. (2019). Prenatal alcohol exposure and offspring alcohol use and misuse at 22 years of age: a prospective longitudinal study. Neurotoxicol. Teratol.71, 1ā5. 10.1016/j.ntt.2018.11.001
51
GonzalesR. A.WeissF. (1998). Suppression of ethanol-reinforced behavior by naltrexone is associated with attenuation of the ethanol-induced increase in dialysate dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens. J. Neurosci.18, 10663ā10671. 10.1523/jneurosci.18-24-10663.1998
52
Gore-LangtonJ. K.SpearL. P. (2019). Prenatal ethanol exposure attenuates sensitivity to the aversive effects of ethanol in adolescence and increases adult preference for a 5% ethanol solution in males, but not females. Alcohol79, 59ā69. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.12.004
53
GraceG. M.RockmanG. E.GlavinG. B. (1986). Effect of prenatal exposure to ethanol on adult ethanol preference and response to zimelidine in rats. Alcohol Alcohol.21, 25ā31. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a044586
54
GrantB. E. (1998). The impact of a family history of alcoholism on the relationship between age at onset of alcohol use and DSM-IV alcohol dependence: results from the national longitudinal alcohol epidemiologic survey. Alcohol Health Res. World22, 144ā147.
55
GrieslerP. C.KandelD. B. (1998). The impact of maternal drinking during and after pregnancy on the drinking of adolescent offspring. J. Stud. Alcohol59, 292ā304. 10.15288/jsa.1998.59.292
56
GruestN.RicherP.HarsB. (2004). Emergence of long-term memory for conditioned aversion in the rat fetus. Dev. Psychobiol.44, 189ā198. 10.1002/dev.20004
57
GuerriC.BazinetA.RileyE. P. (2009). Foetal alcohol spectrum disorders and alterations in brain and behaviour. Alcohol Alcohol.44, 108ā114. 10.1093/alcalc/agn105
58
HahnC. Y.HuangS. Y.KoH. C.HsiehC. H.LeeI. H.YehT. L.et al. (2006). Acetaldehyde involvement in positive and negative alcohol expectancies in han Chinese persons with alcoholism. Arch. Gene. Psychiatry63, 817ā823. 10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.817
59
Hamby-MasonR.ChenJ. J.SchenkerS.PerezA.HendersonG. I. (1997). Catalase mediates acetaldehyde formation from ethanol in fetal and neonatal rat brain. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.21, 1063ā1072. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1997.tb04255.x
60
HanniganJ. H.ChiodoL. M.SokolR. J.JanisseJ.Delaney-BlackV. (2015). Prenatal alcohol exposure selectively enhances young adult perceived pleasantness of alcohol odors. Physiol. Behav.148, 71ā77. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.01.019
61
HellerM.BurdL. (2014). Review of ethanol dispersion, distribution and elimination from the fetal compartment. Birth Defects Res. Part A Clin. Mol. Teratol.100, 277ā283. 10.1002/bdra.23232
62
HilakiviI.KiianmaaK.HellevuoK.HyytiaP. (1987). Effect of prenatal alcohol exposure on neonatal sleep-wake behaviour and adult alcohol consumption in the AA and ANA rat lines. Alcohol Alcohol.22, 231ā240. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a044703
63
HilakiviL. (1986). Effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on neonatal sleep-wake behaviour and adult alcohol consumption in rats. Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. Copenh.59, 36ā42. 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1986.tb00131.x
64
HollowayJ. A.TappW. N. (1978). Effects of prenatal and/or early postnatal exposure to ethanol on offspring of rats. Alcohol Tech. Rep.7, 108ā115.
65
HoneyP. L.GalefB. G. (2003). Ethanol consumption by rat dams during gestation, lactation and weaning increases ethanol consumption by their adolescent young. Dev. Psychobiol.42, 252ā260. 10.1002/dev.10098
66
ItoA.JamalM.AmenoK.TanakaN.TakakuraA.KawamotoT.et al. (2018). Acetaldehyde administrationinduces salsolinol formation in vivo in the dorsal striatum of Aldh2-knockout and C57BL/6N mice. Neurosci. Lett.685, 50ā54. 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.032
67
JohnsonS.MoyerC. L.KlugM. G.BurdL. (2018). Comparison of alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorders and neurodevelopmental disorders associated with prenatal alcohol exposure diagnostic criteria. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr.39, 163ā167. 10.1097/dbp.0000000000000523
68
JonesK. L.SmithD. W. (1973). Recognition of the fetal alcohol syndrome in early infancy. Lancet302, 999ā1001. 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)91092-1
69
JonesK. L.SmithD. W.UllelandC. N.StreissguthA. P. (1973). Pattern of malformation in offspring of chronic alcoholic mothers. The Lancet301, 1267ā1271. 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)91291-9
70
KableJ. A.OāConnorM. J.OlsonH. C.PaleyB.MattsonS. N.AndersonS. M.et al. (2016). Neurobehavioral disorder associated with prenatal alcohol exposure (ND-PAE): proposed DSM-5 diagnosis. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev.47, 335ā346. 10.1007/s10578-015-0566-7
71
KutcherE. O.EgorovA. Y.ChernikovaN. A. (2016). Early social isolation increases alcohol preference in experiment. Zh. Nevrol. Psihiatr. Im. S.S. Korsakova116, 52ā57. 10.17116/jnevro20161164152-57
72
LancasterF. E.SpiegelK. S. (1989). Voluntary beer drinking by pregnant rats: offspring growth, development and behavior. Alcohol6, 199ā205. 10.1016/0741-8329(89)90019-0
73
LopezM. F.Doremus-FitzwaterT. L.BeckerH. C. (2011). Chronic social isolation and chronic variable stress during early development induce later elevated ethanol intake in adult C57BL/6J mice. Alcohol45, 355ā364. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2010.08.017
74
ManningM. A.Eugene HoymeH. (2007). Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: a practical clinical approach to diagnosis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.31, 230ā238. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.016
75
MaoJ.MaH.XuY.SuY.ZhuH.WangR.et al. (2013). Increased levels of monoamine-derived potential neurotoxins in fetal rat brain exposed to ethanol. Neurochem. Res.38, 356ā363. 10.1007/s11064-012-0926-7
76
MarchS. M.AbateP.MolinaJ. C. (2013a). Acetaldehyde involvement in ethanolās postabsortive effects during early ontogeny. Front. Behav. Neurosci.7:70. 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00070
77
MarchS. M.AbateP.SpearN. E.MolinaJ. C. (2013b). The role of acetaldehyde in ethanol reinforcement assessed by Pavlovian conditioning in newborn rats. Psychopharmacology226, 491ā499. 10.1007/s00213-012-2920-9
78
MarchS. M.AbateP.SpearN. E.MolinaJ. C. (2009). Fetal exposure to moderate ethanol doses: heightened operant responsiveness elicited by ethanol-related reinforcers. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.33, 1981ā1993. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01037.x
79
McGivernR. F.ClancyA. N.MousaS. D.CouriD.NobleE. P. (1984). Prenatal alcohol exposure alters enkephalin levels, without affecting ethanol preference. Life Sci.34, 585ā589. 10.1016/0024-3205(84)90492-2
80
McMurrayM. S.WilliamsS. K.JarrettT. M.CoxE. T.FayE. E.OverstreetD. H.et al. (2008). Gestational ethanol and nicotine exposure: effects on maternal behavior, oxytocin and offspring ethanol intake in the rat. Neurotoxicol. Teratol.30, 475ā486. 10.1016/j.ntt.2008.07.001
81
MĆ©ndez-GallardoV.RobinsonS. R. (2010). Opioid mediation of amniotic fluid effects on chemosensory responsiveness in the neonatal rat. Dev. Psychobiol.52, 740ā754. 10.1002/dev.20469
82
MennellaJ. A.JagnowC. P.BeauchampG. K. (2001). Prenatal and postnatal flavor learning by human infants. Pediatrics107, 17ā20. 10.1542/peds.107.6.e88
83
MiddletonF. A.CarrierfensterK.MooneyS. M.YoungentobS. L. (2009). Gestational ethanol exposure alters the behavioral response to ethanol odor and the expression of neurotransmission genes in the olfactory bulb of adolescent rats. Brain Res.1252, 105ā116. 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.023
84
Miranda-MoralesR. S.MolinaJ. C.SpearN. E.AbateP. (2010). Participation of the endogenous opioid system in the acquisition of a prenatal ethanol-related memory: effects on neonatal and preweanling responsiveness to ethanol. Physiol. Behav.101, 153ā160. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.04.033
85
Miranda-MoralesR. S.NizhnikovM. E.SpearN. E. (2014). Prenatal exposure to ethanol during late gestation facilitates operant self-administration of the drug in 5-day-old rats. Alcohol48, 19ā23. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2013.11.001
86
MolinaJ. C.ChotroM. G.DominguezH. D. (1995). āFetal alcohol learning derived from ethanol contamination of the prenatal environment,ā in Fetal Development: A Psychobiological Perspective, eds LecanuetJ. P.FiferW. P.KrasnegorN.SmothermanW. P. (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 419ā438.
87
MolinaJ. C.HoffmannH.SpearL. P.SpearN. E. (1987). Sensorimotor maturation and alcohol responsiveness in rats prenatally exposed to alcohol during gestational day 8. Neurotoxicol. Teratol.9, 121ā128. 10.1016/0892-0362(87)90088-2
88
Molina-MartĆnezL. M.JuĆ”rezJ. (2020). Differential expression of Ī¼-opioid receptors in the nucleus accumbens, amygdala and VTA depends on liking for alcohol, chronic alcohol intake and estradiol treatment. Behav. Brain Res.378:112255. 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112255
89
MooneyS. M.VarlinskayaE. I. (2018). Enhanced sensitivity to socially facilitating and anxiolytic effects of ethanol in adolescent SpragueāDawley rats following acute prenatal ethanol exposure. Alcohol69, 25ā32. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2017.11.002
90
NashF. J.MaickelR. P. (2013). Stress-induced consumption of ethanol by rats. J. Chem. Inform. Model.53, 1689ā1699. 10.1016/0024-3205(85)90546-6
91
NashS. M.WeaverM. S.CowenC. L.DavisS. F.TramillJ. L. (1984). Taste preference of the adult rat as a function of prenatal exposure to ethanol. J. Gen. Psychol.110, 129ā135. 10.1080/00221309.1984.9709956
92
NelsonL. R.LewisJ. W.LiebeskindJ. C.BranchB. J.TaylorA. N. (1983). Stress induced changes in ethanol consumption in adult rats exposed to ethanoll in utero. Pro. West. Pharmacol. Soc.26, 205ā209.
93
NizhnikovM. E.MolinaJ. C.SpearN. E. (2007). Central reinforcing effects of ethanol are blocked by catalase inhibition. Alcohol41, 525ā534. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2007.08.006
94
NizhnikovM. E.PautassiR. M.CarterJ. M.LandinJ. D.VarlinskayaE. I.BordnerK. A.et al. (2014). Brief prenatal ethanol exposure alters behavioral sensitivity to the kappa opioid receptor agonist (U62,066E) and antagonist (Nor-BNI) and reduces kappa opioid receptor expression. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.38, 1630ā1638. 10.1111/acer.12416
95
NizhnikovM. E.PopoolaD. O.CameronN. M. (2016). Transgenerational transmission of the effect of gestational ethanol exposure on ethanol use-related behavior. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.40, 497ā506. 10.1111/acer.12978
96
OāBrienJ. W.HillS. Y. (2014). Effects of prenatal alcohol and cigarette exposure on offspring substance use in multiplex, alcohol-dependent families. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.38, 2952ā2961. 10.1111/acer.12569
97
PautassiR. M.NizhnikovM. E.SpearN. E.MolinaJ. C. (2012). Prenatal ethanol exposure leads to greater ethanol-induced appetitive reinforcement. Alcohol46, 585ā593. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2012.05.004
98
PeanaA. T.PintusF. A.BennardiniF.RocchittaG.BazzuG.SerraP. A.et al. (2017). Is catalase involved in the effects of systemic and pVTA administration of 4-methylpyrazole on ethanol self-administration?Alcohol63, 61ā73. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2017.04.001
99
PhillipsD. S.StainbrookG. L. (1976). Effects of early alcohol exposure upon adult learning ability and taste preferences. Physiol. Psychol.4, 473ā475. 10.3758/bf03326599
100
PopoolaD. O.BorrowA. P.SandersJ. E.NizhnikovM. E.CameronN. M. (2015). Can low-level ethanol exposure during pregnancy influence maternal care? An investigation using two strains of rat across two generations. Physiol. Behav.148, 111ā121. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.01.001
101
PrasadC.PrasadA. (1995). A relationship between increased voluntary alcohol preference and basal hypercorticosteronemia associated with an attenuated rise in corticosterone output during stress. Alcohol12, 59ā63. 10.1016/0741-8329(94)00070-t
102
PrescottC. A.KendlerK. S. (1999). Age at first drink and risk for alcoholism: a noncausal association. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.23, 101ā107. 10.1097/00000374-199901000-00014
103
PuetaM.AbateP.SpearN. E.MolinaJ. C. (2005). Interactions between ethanol experiences during late gestation and nursing: effects upon infantile and maternal responsiveness to ethanol. Int. J. Comparat. Psychol.18, 207ā224.
104
QuertemontE.TambourS. (2004). Is ethanol a pro-drug? The role of acetaldehyde in the central effects of ethanol. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.25, 130ā134. 10.1016/j.tips.2004.01.001
105
QuintanillaM. E.Rivera-MezaM.Berrios-CĆ”rcamoP. A.BustamanteD.BuscagliaM.MoralesP.et al. (2014). Salsolinol, free of isosalsolinol, exerts ethanol-like motivational/sensitization effects leading to increases in ethanol intake. Alcohol48, 551ā559. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2014.07.003
106
RandallC. L.HughesS. S.WilliamsC. K.AntonR. F. (1983). Effect of prenatal alcohol exposure on consumption of alcohol and alcohol-induced sleep time in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.18, 325ā329. 10.1016/0091-3057(83)90194-6
107
ReyesE.GarciaK. D.JonesB. C. (1985). Effects of the maternal consumption of alcohol on alcohol selection in rats. Alcohol2, 323ā326. 10.1016/0741-8329(85)90068-0
108
RileyE. P.McGeeC. L. (2005). Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: an overview with emphasis on changes in brain and behavior. Exp. Biol. Med. Maywood230, 357ā365. 10.1177/15353702-0323006-03
109
SchaalB.MarlierL.SoussignanR. (2000). Human foetuses learn odours from their pregnant motherās diet. Chem. Senses729ā737. 10.1093/chemse/25.6.729
110
SheaK. M.HewittA. J.OlmsteadM. C.BrienJ. F.ReynoldsJ. N. (2012). Maternal ethanol consumption by pregnant guinea pigs causes neurobehavioral deficits and increases ethanol preference in offspring. Behav. Pharmacol.23, 105ā112. 10.1097/fbp.0b013e32834ed866
111
ShenR. Y.HanniganJ. H.KapatosG. (1999). Prenatal ethanol reduces the activity of adult midbrain dopamine neurons. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.23, 1801ā1807. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1999.tb04076.x
112
SmothermanW. P. (1982). In utero chemosensory experience alters taste preferences and corticosterone responsiveness. Behav. Neural Biol.36, 61ā68. 10.1016/s0163-1047(82)90245-x
113
SmothermanW. P.RobinsonS. R. (1985). The rat fetus in its environment: behavioral adjustments to novel, familiar, aversive and conditioned stimuli presented in utero. Behav. Neurosci.99, 521ā530. 10.1037/0735-7044.99.3.521
114
SmothermanW. P.RobinsonS. R. (1988a). Behavior of the Fetus.Caldwell, New Jersey: The Telford Press.
115
SmothermanW. P.RobinsonS. R. (1988b). āThe uterus as environment: the ecology of fetal behavior,ā in Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology, ed. BlassE. M. (New York: Plenun Pub), 149ā196.
116
SmothermanW. P. (2002a). Classical conditioning in the rat fetus: involvement of mu and kappa opioid systems in the conditioned response. Dev. Psychobiol.40, 104ā115. 10.1002/dev.10016
117
SmothermanW. P. (2002b). Classical conditioning in the rat fetus: temporal characteristics and behavioral correlates of the conditioned response. Dev. Psychobiol.40, 116ā130. 10.1002/dev.10017
118
SpearL. P. (2000). Modeling adolescent development and alcohol use in animals. Alcohol Res. Health24, 115ā123. 10.1097/01.ALC.0000171046.78556.66
119
SpearL. P. (2002). The adolescent brain and the college drinker: biological basis of propensity to use and misuse alcohol. J. Stud. Alcohol63, 71ā81. 10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.71
120
SpearL. P. (2015). Adolescent alcohol exposure: are there separable vulnerable periods within adolescence?Physiol. Behav.148, 122ā130. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.01.027
121
SpearN. E.MolinaJ. C. (2005). Fetal or infantile exposure to ethanol promotes ethanol ingestion in adolescence and adulthood: a theoretical review. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.29, 909ā929. 10.1097/01.alc.0000171046.78556.66
122
SreenathanR. N.PadmanabhanR.SinghS. (1982). Teratogenic effects of acetaldehyde in the rat. Drug Alcohol Depend.9, 339ā350. 10.1016/0376-8716(82)90072-2
123
StickrodG.KimbleD. P.SmothermanW. P. (1982). In utero taste/odor aversion conditioning in the rat. Physiol. Behav.28, 5ā7. 10.1016/0031-9384(82)90093-2
124
StrattonK.HoweC.BattagliaF. C. (1996). Fetal Alcohol Syndrome: Diagnosis, Epidemiology, Prevention and Treatment. (Washington, DC: National Academies Press).
125
StreissguthA. P.MartinD. C.MartinJ. C.BarrH. M. (1981). The seattle longitudinal propective-study on alcohol and pregnancy. Neurobehav. Toxicol. Teratol.3, 223ā233.
126
StreissguthA. (2007). Offspring effects of prenatal alcohol exposure from birth to 25 years: the seattle prospective longitudinal study. J. Clin. Psychol. Med. Sett.14, 81ā101. 10.1007/s10880-007-9067-6
127
StreissguthA. P. (1986). āThe behavioral teratology of alcohol: performance, behavioral and intellectual deficits in prenatally exposed children,ā in Alcohol and Brain Development, ed. WestJ. R. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 3ā44.
128
StrombergM. F.VolpicelliJ. R.OāBrienC. P. (1998). Effects of naltrexone administered repeatedly across 30 or 60 days on ethanol consumption using a limited access procedure in the rat. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.22, 2186ā2191. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1998.tb05932.x
129
TempleV. K.CookJ. L.UnsworthK.RajaniH.MelaM. (2019). Mental health and affect regulation impairment in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD): results from the canadian national FASD database. Alcohol Alcohol.54, 545ā550. 10.1093/alcalc/agz049
130
WebsterW. S.WalshD. A.McEwenS. E.LipsonA. H. (1983). Some teratogenic properties of ethanol and acetaldehyde in C57BL/6J mice: implications for the study of the fetal alcohol syndrome. Teratology27, 231ā243. 10.1002/tera.1420270211
131
Wille-BilleA.BelliaF.JimĆ©nez GarcĆaA. M.Miranda-MoralesR. S.DāAddarioC.PautassiR. M. (2020). Early exposure to environmental enrichment modulates the effects of prenatal ethanol exposure upon opioid gene expression and adolescent ethanol intake. Neuropharmacology165:107917. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.107917
132
XieG.KrnjevicK.YeJ. H. (2013). Salsolinol modulation of dopamine neurons. Front. Behav. Neurosci.7:52. 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00052
133
XieG.HipĆ³litoL.ZuoW.PolacheA.GraneroL.KrnjeviÄK.et al. (2012). Salsolinol stimulates dopamine neurons in slices of posterior ventral tegmental area indirectly by activating Ī¼-opioid receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.341, 43ā50. 10.1124/jpet.111.186833
134
YatesW. R.CadoretR. J.TroughtonE. P.StewartM.GiuntaT. S. (1998). Effect of fetal alcohol exposure on adult symptoms of nicotine, alcohol and drug dependence. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.22, 914ā920. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1998.tb03889.x
135
YoungentobS. L.GlendinningJ. I. (2009). Fetal ethanol exposure increases ethanol intake by making it smell and taste better. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A106, 5359ā5364. 10.1073/pnas.0809804106
136
YoungentobS. L.KentP. F.YoungentobL. M. (2012). Gestational naltrexone ameliorates fetal ethanol exposures enhancing effect on the postnatal behavioral and neural response to ethanol. Exp. Biol. Med. Maywood237, 1197ā1208. 10.1258/ebm.2012.012132
137
YoungentobS. L.MolinaJ. C.SpearN. E.YoungentobL. M. (2007). The effect of gestational ethanol exposure on voluntary ethanol intake in early postnatal and adult rats. Behav. Neurosci.121, 1306ā1315. 10.1037/0735-7044.121.6.1306
138
ZorzanoA.HerreraE. (1989). Disposition of ethanol and acetaldehyde in late pregnant rats and their fetuses. Pediatr. Res.25, 102ā106. 10.1203/00006450-198901000-00022
Summary
Keywords
prenatal, alcohol, learning, opioids, acetaldehyde, associative, reinforcer
Citation
GaztaƱaga M, Angulo-Alcalde A and Chotro MG (2020) Prenatal Alcohol Exposure as a Case of Involuntary Early Onset of Alcohol Use: Consequences and Proposed Mechanisms From Animal Studies. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 14:26. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00026
Received
22 December 2019
Accepted
04 February 2020
Published
05 March 2020
Volume
14 - 2020
Edited by
Ricardo Marcos Pautassi, National University of Cordoba, Argentina
Reviewed by
Marvin Rafael Diaz, Binghamton University, United States; Lindsay Halladay, Santa Clara University, United States
Updates
Copyright
Ā© 2020 GaztaƱaga, Angulo-Alcalde and Chotro.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mirari GaztaƱaga mirari.gaztanaga@ehu.eus
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Motivation and Reward, a section of the journal Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.