Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neuroanat., 25 August 2022
This article is part of the Research Topic Methods and Applications in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy View all 8 articles

Quantitative myelin-related maps from R1 and T2* ratio images using a single ME-MP2RAGE sequence in 7T MRI

  • 1Neuroscience Research Institute, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea
  • 2Department of Psychiatry, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, South Korea
  • 3Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea

Background: There still are limitations associated with quantifying myelin content using brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) despite several studies conducted on this subject. Therefore, this study aimed: (1) to propose a myelin-related mapping technique to obtain the quantitative R1/T2* (q-Ratio) that has the advantage of quick processing and less dependency on imaging parameters, (2) to validate this adapted q-Ratio method by comparing the quantitative myelin-related map with those acquired through an existing mapping method [T1-weighted/T2*-weighted (w-Ratio)], and (3) to determine the q-Ratio myelin-related values in the white and gray matter, and the relationship between the q-Ratio myelin-related value and cerebral volume size in regions of interest (ROIs) in a healthy population.

Methods: The multi-echo magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient echoes (ME-MP2RAGE) sequence was used in a 7 Tesla (7T) MRI for the acquisition of data regarding myelin content in 10 healthy participants. A correlation analysis was performed between myelin-related values obtained through the q-Ratio and w-Ratio methods. Additionally, myelin distribution was analyzed and compared in the white and gray matter, and the correlation between cerebral volume size and q-Ratio myelin-related value was analyzed in ROIs in the brain.

Results: The myelin-related maps acquired through the q-Ratio and w-Ratio methods were significantly correlated (p < 0.001), but the q-Ratio myelin-related map was much clearer. Additionally, the cerebral volume size in the gray matter was 399.40% larger than that in the white matter, but the q-Ratio myelin-related value in the gray matter was 80.83% lower than that of the white matter. Furthermore, volume size was positively correlated with q-Ratio myelin-related values in the white matter (r = 0.509, p = 0.006) but not in the gray matter (r = -0.133, p = 0.402).

Conclusions: In this study, we validated using a q-Ratio myelin-related map that was acquired in one imaging sequence at 7T MRI. In addition, we found a significant correlation between ROI volume size and the q-Ratio myelin-related value in the white matter but not in the gray matter. It is expected that this technique could be applied to the study of various neuropsychiatric diseases related to demyelination in the future.

Introduction

Myelin surrounds the axon of neurons and is an essential component for maintaining efficient brain function (Ganzetti et al., 2014). Myelin maintains nerve fiber integrity and speeds up the propagation of action potentials, thereby facilitating proper brain function (Salzer, 2015). When myelin is damaged, it interferes with the normal signal transmission of nerves, which causes various symptoms affecting sensory function, cognition, and behavior (Papuć and Rejdak, 2018). Therefore, it is considered important to conduct an accurate quantitative evaluation of myelin in neuropsychiatric disorders, such as multiple sclerosis (Love, 2006), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (Jeong et al., 2017), traumatic brain injury (Mierzwa et al., 2015; Shi et al., 2015), Alzheimer’s disease (Fornari et al., 2012), and major depressive disorder (Sacchet and Gotlib, 2017).

Recently, based on research results indicating that myelin as well as its surrounding lipids, water, and iron affect longitudinal (T1 or R1) and transverse (T2 and T2*) relaxation times, several studies on noninvasive myelin evaluation methods using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been initiated (Koenig, 1991; Miot-Noirault et al., 1997; Schmierer et al., 2004; Callaghan et al., 2015; Haast et al., 2016). Callaghan et al. studied the dependence of R1 on local microstructural tissue properties, such as macromolecular characteristics, iron content, and water content (Callaghan et al., 2015). Miot-Noirault et al. (1997) also visualized gray matter differentiation on MRI using the T2 relaxation time, and they quantitatively analyzed the MRI data in order to evaluate the progress of myelination in the brain. However, these studies only used data derived from one of the various types of contrast images. Therefore, several studies have pursued methods involving the use of multiple contrast images and/or various imaging variables, which could possibly aid in acquiring improved myelin maps. Ganzetti et al. (2014) used the T1-weighted/T2-weighted technique for myelin mapping, and Haast et al. compared various methods for obtaining a myelin-related image suitable for subject-specific anatomical cortical parcellation (Haast et al., 2016). As such, cerebral myelination has been studied with various techniques that provide the contrast-enhanced images, such as T1-weighted/T2*-weighted (w-Ratio), R1, and T2* methods. Consequently, it was found that high signal intensity in cortical regions with high myelination could be seen in T1-weighted and R1 images, and low signal intensity, in T1 and T2* images (Sigalovsky et al., 2006; Geyer et al., 2011; Glasser and Van Essen, 2011; Cohen-Adad et al., 2012; Dick et al., 2012; Bock et al., 2013; Sereno et al., 2013; Lutti et al., 2014; De Martino et al., 2015; Haast et al., 2016).

Among the myelin evaluation methods, methods involving the division of T1-weighted images by T2*-weighted images resulted in an improvement in myelin contrast between heavily myelinated and non-myelinated regions (Glasser and Van Essen, 2011; De Martino et al., 2015) and in the effective removal of receive bias field owing to image division (Haast et al., 2016). However, there are limitations associated with weighted images, as they are not quantitative and stable values corresponding to the basic biochemical composition of tissues; this is because these images vary according to MRI imaging parameters and the selected sequences. On the other hand, the myelin evaluation method using R1 and T2* has quantitative value; however, the acquisition time (TA) is long because a large number of acquisition datasets are required for avoiding systematic bias in the MRI parameter estimates. In addition, since systematic bias is usually larger than the subtle changes in the MRI signal resulting from myelin content changes, it should be appropriately controlled in order to obtain quantitative MRI parameter estimates of the tissue microarchitecture (Lutti et al., 2014). Based on this, many attempts have been made to obtain quantitative and more reliable values in order to improve the contrast of myelinated areas by determining the myelin content through the R1/T2* (q-Ratio) method (Haast et al., 2016). However, these previous attempts have required a long TA due to multiple image sequences as well as an additional process for the registration of the pixel positions in images obtained via different sequences.

Therefore, in this study, we aimed: (1) to introduce a technique to obtain a q-Ratio myelin-related map that has the advantage of quick processing and less dependency on imaging parameters, (2) to validate this method by comparing the acquired q-Ratio myelin-related maps with those acquired through the existing mapping method (w-Ratio), and (3) to determine the q-Ratio myelin-related values in white and gray matter and the relationship between the q-Ratio myelin-related value and the volume size of brain regions of interest (ROIs) in a healthy population.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

Ten healthy volunteers (male:female = 2:8) aged 20–65 years (mean ± standard deviation: 32.7 ± 11.8) participated in this study. They were recruited as healthy controls in relation to patients with major depressive disorder. A board-certified psychiatrist interviewed all the participants and assessed their eligibility for participation in this study using a structured clinical interview employing the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5; First et al., 2015). The following exclusion criteria were applied: left-handedness according to the Edinburgh Handedness Test (Oldfield, 1971), unstable or major medical condition, neurological disorders, any psychiatric history, history of taking psychotropic medications, substance use disorder, intellectual disability, personality disorder, first-degree relatives with major psychiatric disorders, neurocognitive disorders, history of head trauma, previous abnormal findings on brain imaging, contraindications to MRI (e.g., metals in the body), and pregnancy or lactation. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gil Medical Center (IRB No. GDIRB2018-005); further, before starting the experiment, the purpose of the study was explained to all the participants, and written informed consent was obtained.

Data acquisition parameters

Sagittal images of the whole brain were obtained with an 8-channel phase-array coil using a 7T MRI system (Magnetom, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). In order to ensure that the participants were in a comfortable position, a pillow was placed under the head, and a foam cushion was used to minimize head movement. The prototype multi-echo magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient echoes (ME-MP2RAGE) sequence was used (Metere et al., 2017), and images of 208 slices were obtained with repetition time (TR) of 8,000 ms; echo times (TEs) of 3.46, 7.28, 11.1, and 14.92 ms; inversion times (TI) of 1,000 and 3,200 ms; generalized auto-calibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) with accelerating factor = 3 (50 reference lines); 7/8 and 6/8 partial Fourier factors along the phase-encoding (PE) and slice-encoding (SE) directions, respectively; and a matrix size of 256 × 256. The acquisition parameters used in this study are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Acquisition parameters used with the ME-MP2RAGE sequence in 7T MRI.

Image processing

Both T1 and T2* maps were created from the images acquired in the single sequence, but they were created through separate processes. T1 maps were generated immediately after data acquisition as part of the built-in data acquisition process. T2* maps, however, were generated through a separate process that required fitting an appropriate algorithm to the acquired images. The University of Edinburgh’s “Fit T2 or T2 Star MRI data and create parameters maps”1 tool was employed to generate R2* maps with multiple echo images created from the second inversion radiofrequency pulse, which involved the use of the non-linear least-square curve fitting method with the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm (Thrippleton et al., 2019). For the verification of the q-Ratio technique, the first TE (TE1) image of the first TI (TI1) process and fourth TE (TE4) image of the second TI (TI2) process were used as the T1-weighted and T2*-weighted images, respectively.

For the group analysis of cerebral myelin-related maps, T1-weighted, T2*-weighted, T1, and R2* images were normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) 152 template in the standard space using SPM12 by performing the following steps. For easy segmentation, the T1 map was contrast-inverted, segmented and divided into gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). A mask image was created by adding gray matter, white matter, and bone images and was multiplied by an inverted T1 map to generate an image aligned to the MNI template. T1-weighted images, T2*-weighted images, original T1 maps, and R2* maps were added to the “images to write” and were normalized with a voxel size of 0.5 mm.

A T2* map (e.g., 1/R2* map) was created from the normalized R2* map, which was registered in the standard space. The T1 and T2* ranges were set to 700–4,000 ms and 1–60 ms, respectively (Metere et al., 2017). A q-Ratio myelin-related map was created by dividing the R1 map by the T2* map (Figure 1). In addition, to verify the q-Ratio technique, a w-Ratio myelin-related map was also created by dividing the normalized T1-weighted image by the T2*-weighted image (Figure 2). As artifacts around the edge of the brain can make further analysis difficult (visible in Figure 2), we set the thresholds of the gray and white matter to 0.4 and 0.6, respectively, to remove the artifactual signals in the w-Ratio myelin-related map. Furthermore, the voxels in which the artifacts were removed in the w-Ratio map were used as a mask image for obtaining the q-Ratio myelin-related values.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the entire procedure from image acquisition to myelin-related mapping.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Comparison of myelin-related mapping methods. The myelin-related maps obtained with the T1-weighted/T2*-weighted (w-Ratio) and R1/T2* (q-Ratio) methods are similar in both subjects. Note that the FOV was not optimized during image acquisition and that aliasing artifacts occurred, depending on the subjects’ head sizes, mainly along the anterior and posterior regions in Subject 1 and the left and right regions in Subject 2. Abbreviations: FOV, field-of-view.

Validation and analysis of the adapted q-Ratio technique

To validate the q-Ratio myelin-related mapping technique, the q-Ratio myelin-related map was compared with the w-Ratio myelin-related map. First, to assess the sensitivity to myelin-related variation, the difference between averaged myelin-related values in the white and gray matter in both q-Ratio and w-ratio myelin-related maps was compared. Additionally, the inter-subject coefficient of variation (COV) was calculated for both the q-Ratio and w-Ratio maps to examine the myelination variability across subjects (Brown, 1998). As Haast et al. (2016) found that R1 myelin-related maps had lower inter-subject COV than did either q-Ratio (obtained through two sequences) or w-Ratio myelin-related maps, R1 myelin-related maps were also included in the COV analysis for comparison.

For the selection of ROIs in the gray and white matter in the left hemisphere (Ganzetti et al., 2014), we used the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) ICBM-DTI-81 white matter labels atlas (Mori et al., 2008) and Automated Anatomical Labeling atlas 3 (AAL3; Rolls et al., 2020), which were also normalized to 0.5 mm. For further comparison, five representative ROIs were selected in the gray matter [superior frontal gyrus-dorsolate (Frontal_Sup_2), lingual gyrus (Lingual), middle occipital gyrus (Occipital_Mid), superior temporal gyrus (Temporal_Sup), and anterior cingulate cortex (subgenual; ACC_sub)], and seven representative ROIs were selected in the white matter [genu of corpus callosum (GCC), anterior limb of internal capsules (ALIC), posterior limb of internal capsules (PLIC), retrolenticular limb of internal capsules (RLIC), anterior corona radiata (ACR), posterior thalamic radiation (including optic radiation; PTR), and external capsule (EC)]. To examine the cerebral myelin distribution, the average myelin-related map of 10 subjects was obtained (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Averaged myelin-related maps of total participants. A high signal appears in the white matter.

For this comparison, the subcortical and cerebellar areas were excluded to facilitate clear differentiation between white and gray matter because these areas usually include more complicated neural components and a relatively large distribution of nerve fibers. Therefore, the gray matter included the cerebral and cingulate cortices allocated with AAL3. Regardless of gray or white matter, the w-Ratio and q-Ratio myelin-related maps within all the selected ROIs were analyzed using the correlation analysis. Furthermore, the correlation between q-Ratio myelin-related value and cerebral volume size in each ROI in the gray and white matter was analyzed using the data of the 10 subjects. This was performed using MATLAB 2018b (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA).

Results

The inter-subject COVs for the q-Ratio, w-Ratio, and R1 maps in the white matter were 0.321 (R1) < 0.556 (q-Ratio) < 0.644 (w-Ratio). In the gray matter, COVs were 0.521 (R1) < 0.839 (q-Ratio) < 0.911 (w-Ratio).

The q-Ratio myelin-related map in two representative subjects was comparable to the w-Ratio myelin-related map, as shown in Figure 2. In the w-Ratio myelin-related map, exaggerated signals were found at the edges of the brain. On the other hand, in the q-Ratio myelin-related map, the intensity of these signals was substantially decreased.

The contrast differences between the white and gray matter were 44.67% (z = 0.523) and 53.50% (z = 0.547) in the q-Ratio and the w-Ratio maps, respectively. The difference between the white and gray matter was much clearer when the myelin-related maps from 10 subjects were averaged (Figure 3). However, when TI2-TE3 was used instead of TI2-TE4, the contrast difference between the white and gray matter decreased to 46.93% (z = 0.536) for the w-Ratio map.

The average of myelin-related values calculated using the w-Ratio method was 0.307 in the white matter and 0.157 in the gray matter. When TE3 images of TI2 were used as the T2*-weighted images, the averaged w-Ratio myelin-related values were 0.266 in the white matter and 0.165 in the gray matter. The average of myelin-related values calculated using the q-Ratio method was 27.31 ms−2 in the white matter and 16.62 ms−2 in the gray matter. In the correlation analysis between the myelin-related values obtained through the two mapping methods, there was a significant positive correlation in both the gray and white matter (r = 0.706, p < 0.001; r = 0.899, p < 0.001, respectively; Figure 4).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Correlation between the two myelin-related mapping methods. Abbreviations: ROI, region of interest.

In the selected ROIs in the left hemisphere of the participants, the q-Ratio myelin-related values in the white matter were higher (range: 21.70–44.85 ms−2) than those in the gray matter (range: 11.81–24.81 ms−2; Figure 5). The q-Ratio myelin-related values in the selected representative ROIs in Figure 5 were as follows: GCC in the white matter area, 30.24 ms−2; ALIC, 37.94 ms−2; PLIC, 31.95 ms−2; RLIC, 34.09 ms−2; ACR, 32.89 ms−2; PTR, 32.90 ms−2; and EC, 25.49 ms−2. The q-Ratio myelin-related values in Frontal_Sup2 in the gray matter area was 14.17 ms−2 and those in the Lingual, Occipital_Mid, TemporalSup, and ACCsub cortices were 20.48, 21.23, 17.73, and 18.42 ms−2, respectively.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Q-Ratio myelin-related values in the representative ROIs in the gray and white matter in the left hemisphere. Averaged myelin-related map of 10 subjects was shown on the left. Q-Ratio myelin-related values in the gray matter (right-top) and in the white matter (right-bottom) were compared. Abbreviations: ROIs, regions of interest. In the gray matter, #003: Frontal_Sup_2 (superior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral), #051: Lingual (lingual gyrus), #055: Occipital_Mid (middle occipital gyrus), #085: Temporal_Sup (superior temporal gyrus), #151: ACC_sub (anterior cingulate cortex, subgenual). In the white matter, #03: GCC (genu of corpus callosum), #18: ALIC (anterior limb of internal capsule), #20: PLIC (posterior limb of internal capsule), #22: RLIC (retrolenticular part of internal capsule), #24: ACR (anterior corona radiate), #30: PTR [posterior thalamic radiation (include optic radiation)], #34: EC (external capsule).

The results corresponding to the cerebral volume size and myelin-related value derived through the q-Ratio method were as follows. The median [95% confidence interval (CI)] q-Ratio myelin-related value in the white matter and cerebral volume size were 28.68 (24.70–29.93) ms−2 and 4,653.26 (4,126.84–7,574.65) mm3, respectively (Table 2), and the median q-Ratio myelin-related value in the gray matter (cortical area) and cerebral volume size were 15.86 (15.68–17.57) ms−2 and 23,238.44 (22,155.09–34,566.04) mm3, respectively (Table 3). Although the volume size of the gray matter was 399.40% larger than that of the white matter, the q-Ratio myelin-related value of the white matter was 80.83% higher than that of the gray matter. Table 2 presents the q-Ratio myelin-related value and cerebral volume size in each ROI in the white matter; there was a positive correlation between the cerebral volume size and q-Ratio myelin-related value (r = 0.509, p = 0.006). On the other hand, there was no significant correlation in the gray matter (r = -0.133, p = 0.402; Figure 6).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Correlation of q-Ratio myelin-related value and cerebral volume size in the gray and white matter. In the white matter, there was a significant correlation between the cerebral volume size and myelin-related value (r = 0.509, p = 0.006), and the slope of the trend line was observed to increase more steeply. However, there was no significant relationship with cerebral volume size in the gray matter.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Quantitative ratio (q-ratio) myelin-related values and cerebral volume sizes in the white matter ROIs.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Quantitative ratio (q-ratio) myelin-related values and cerebral volume sizes in the gray matter ROIs.

Discussion

In this study of cerebral myelin mapping, high-resolution images were obtained within a reasonable acquisition time using the ME-MP2RAGE sequence at 7T MRI, and quantitative myelin-related mapping was performed using the q-Ratio method. The acquired myelin-related map was comparable to those created using weighted images, which have been studied in various ways, thus validating the reliability of the proposed method. In addition, the results of the comparison of the q-Ratio myelin-related values in the white and gray matter of healthy subjects suggest the possibility of further developing the proposed method for various clinical applications in the future.

Although the ME-MP2RAGE sequence used in this study had the advantage of obtaining multiple images with one imaging scan, the TA (14 min 16 s), while reasonable, might not seem to be advantageous compared to a typical acquisition collected over multiple shorter sequences. However, TA can be reduced by adjusting parameters that affect TA, such as TR and TI. Therefore, the proposed technique allows for effectively acquiring multiple images in a single sequence, providing simplicity in image processing while preserving the independence of image parameters and/or the possibility of shortening the TA.

Among the myelin-related mapping methods, R1 had the lowest COV. T1 (or R1) is known to be an MR parameter closely related to tissue myelination and myelin-bound cholesterol, and it is a contrast source in which myelin content dominates (Haast et al., 2016). However, oligodendrocytes, glial cells of the central nervous system that produce myelin, are known to stain iron more strongly than other cells in the normal adult brain and require a certain amount of iron for the production and maintenance of myelin (Todorich et al., 2009). As we age, especially when neurons begin to accumulate high levels of iron, oxidative stress-related neurodegeneration and myelin destruction can occur, which can lead to neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease (Todorich et al., 2009). As such, myelin is considered important in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Moreover, pathologically, it is known that various neurodegenerative disorders and iron levels in the brain area are correlated (Berg and Youdim, 2006). Therefore, it is necessary to weight the iron contribution to better assess myelin information. The iron contribution in T1 maps (=1/R1 map) is, on average, 10% in the white matter and 36% in the gray matter (Stüber et al., 2014; Haast et al., 2016). In contrast, the T2* map (=1/R2* map) is known as a contrast source dominated by iron (Haast et al., 2016). Additionally, myelin studies using R2* and quantitative susceptibility mapping confirm that R2* is directly proportional to myelin-related content as well as iron content (Wood et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2017). Therefore, through this study, we suggest that the proposed method could aid in the interpretation of myelin in relation to iron, particularly in cases of aging and neurodegenerative or psychiatric disorders.

The verification of the q-Ratio technique and comparison with the w-Ratio myelin-related mapping technique revealed that both methods produced a similar pattern of showing a high signal in the white matter (Figure 2), which was seen much more clearly in the averaged myelin-related map (Figure 3). This qualitative observation was corroborated through an objective measure calculating the difference between gray and white matter, confirming that the w-Ratio myelin-related map was slightly more sensitive to the myelin-related variations than was the q-Ratio myelin-related map. Further, the myelin-related value calculated using the q-Ratio myelin-related mapping method was significantly correlated with that calculated using the w-Ratio myelin-related mapping method in both the gray and white matter, as shown in Figure 4. Considering that the R1 and T2* maps used in the q-Ratio method contain quantitative information, it appears that the adapted q-Ratio method is superior to the w-Ratio method. Therefore, it seems that the q-Ratio map proposed here with images acquired in one sequence is sufficient to replace the w-Ratio map.

Based on these results, it was confirmed that the limitations of weighted images obtained with various MRI parameters and of those collected with different MRI pulse sequences, which provide inconsistent myelin-related contrasts (Ganzetti et al., 2014), could be overcome with the myelin-related value calculated noninvasively and quantitatively using q-Ratio images. This is because weighted images cannot provide constant contrasts, as they vary with the MRI acquisition parameters, and it might be necessary to capture images with different sequences for further registration processing. For comparing the q-Ratio method with the w-Ratio method in this study, we used the TE1 image of TI1 as the T1-weighted image and the TE4 image of TI2 as the T2*-weighted image; however, the myelin-related value is likely to change when different weighted images are used during the w-Ratio mapping (e.g., TE2 image of TI1 and TE3 image of TI2). Indeed, when TI1-TE1 was divided by TI2-TE3, the w-Ratio values were 0.165 and 0.266 in the gray and white matter, respectively, while when divided by TI2-TE4, the w-Ratio values were 0.157 and 0.307 in the gray and white matter, respectively. Furthermore, when TI2-TE3 was used for the w-Ratio map, the difference between gray and white matter decreased, from 53.50% (z = 0.547) with TI2-TE4 to 46.93% (z = 0.536). Given that the w-Ratio value can vary depending on which sequence timing is used even with the same parameters, this variability reconfirms the limitations of the w-Ratio method. Therefore, it seems necessary to compare the myelin-related values obtained through our q-Ratio method with those obtained using other w-Ratio methods.

The results of the analysis of the q-Ratio myelin-related values in the white and gray matter ROIs in healthy subjects revealed that the average cerebral volume size in the white matter ROIs was smaller than that in the gray matter ROIs; however, the average q-Ratio myelin-related value in the white matter ROIs was higher. The median q-Ratio myelin-related value in the white matter ROIs was 28.68 ms−2 and that was 15.86 ms−2 in the gray matter ROIs. In addition to these results, the cerebral volume size and q-Ratio myelin-related value were positively correlated in the white matter, which is mainly composed of myelinated axons. However, there was no significant correlation in the gray matter, which is presumably because myelin is not a dominant component in the gray matter compared to in the white matter and because the gray matter also has other complicated components.

In conclusion, we were able to validate the quantitative measurement of myelin through the q-Ratio technique. Further, it was confirmed that the cerebral volume size and q-Ratio myelin-related value are positively correlated in the white matter, but this correlation was not seen in the gray matter. However, an in-depth study of the normal range of myelin was still not conducted due to the small number of participants. Therefore, in future studies, larger sample sizes must be used, and the effect of neuropsychiatric disorders on myelin must be examined by comparing the q-Ratio myelin-related values between healthy subjects and patients with neuropsychiatric disorders. In addition, due to the inhomogeneity of 7T MRI, q-Ratio myelin-related values in some sensitive regions still be carefully considered and should be studied further in larger samples. Furthermore, the stability of the q-Ratio method proposed here should be further examined through comparison of various sequences and further validation of various imaging parameters and analyses of test-retest data. In addition, the gray matter atlas includes white matter components within the gray matter; due to this potential limitation, it is necessary to perform an analysis according to the components of the gray and white matter within the ROIs in a future study. Finally, some regions in the subcortical areas, such as the thalamus, pallidum, and putamen, where the myelin-related signal was very high, should be further analyzed. If these efforts were undertaken in further studies, they can be expected to make a great contribution to the identification of the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders caused by demyelination.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gil Medical Center (IRB No. GDIRB2018-005). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

J-MS, S-GK, and C-KK contributed to the conception and design of the study. S-EC and S-GK recruited the participants and conducted the experiments. J-MS and C-KK analyzed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. J-MS, S-GK, and C-KK edited the manuscript. All the authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the South Korean government (MSIT; NRF-2020R1A2C1004355, NRF-2020R1A2C1007527). This research was also funded by the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, South Korea (grant number: HI17C2665).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

This work was performed with the support of Tobias Kober, the developer of the MP2RAGE sequence (Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthineers, Lausanne, Switzerland). We would also like to thank the staff of Siemens Korea (Inseong Kim and Sugil Kim).

Footnotes

  1. ^ http://github.com/mjt320/T2Star

References

Berg, D., and Youdim, M. B. H. (2006). Role of iron in neurodegenerative disorders. Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging 17, 5–17. doi: 10.1097/01.rmr.0000245461.90406.ad

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bock, N. A., Hashim, E., Janik, R., Konyer, N. B., Weiss, M., Stanisz, G. J., et al. (2013). Optimizing T1-weighted imaging of cortical myelin content at 3.0T. Neuroimage 65, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown, C. E. (1998). “Coefficient of variation,” in Applied Multivariate Statistics in Geohydrology and Related Sciences, ed C. E. Brown (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer), 155–157. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-80328-4_13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Callaghan, M. F., Helms, G., Lutti, A., Mohammadi, S., and Weiskopf, N. (2015). A general linear relaxometry model of R1 using imaging data: general linear relaxometry model of R1. Magn. Reson. Med. 73, 1309–1314. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cohen-Adad, J., Polimeni, J. R., Helmer, K. G., Benner, T., McNab, J. A., Wald, L. L., et al. (2012). T2* mapping and B0 orientation-dependence at 7T reveal cyto- and myeloarchitecture organization of the human cortex. Neuroimage 60, 1006–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Martino, F., Moerel, M., Xu, J., van de Moortele, P.-F., Ugurbil, K., Goebel, R., et al. (2015). High-resolution mapping of myeloarchitecture in vivo: localization of auditory areas in the human brain. Cereb. Cortex 25, 3394–3405. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu150

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dick, F., Taylor Tierney, A., Lutti, A., Josephs, O., Sereno, M. I., and Weiskopf, N. (2012). In vivo functional and myeloarchitectonic mapping of human primary auditory areas. J. Neurosci. 32, 16095–16105. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1712-12.2012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

First, M. B., Williams, J. B. W., Karg, R. S., and Spitzer, R. L. (2015). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders, Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.

Google Scholar

Fornari, E., Maeder, P., Meuli, R., Ghika, J., and Knyazeva, M. G. (2012). Demyelination of superficial white matter in early Alzheimer’s disease: a magnetization transfer imaging study. Neurobiol. Aging 33, 428.e7–428.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.11.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ganzetti, M., Wenderoth, N., and Mantini, D. (2014). Whole brain myelin mapping using T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging data. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:671. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00671

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Geyer, S., Weiss, M., Reimann, K., Lohmann, G., and Turner, R. (2011). Microstructural parcellation of the human cerebral cortex - from brodmann’s post-mortem map to in vivo mapping with high-field magnetic resonance imaging. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:19. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glasser, M. F., and Van Essen, D. C. (2011). Mapping human cortical areas in vivo based on myelin content as revealed by T1- and T2-weighted MRI. J. Neurosci. 31, 11597–11616. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2180-11.2011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haast, R. A. M., Ivanov, D., Formisano, E., and Uludaǧ, K. (2016). Reproducibility and reliability of quantitative and weighted T1 and T*2; mapping for myelin-based cortical parcellation at 7 tesla. Front. Neuroanat. 10:112. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2016.00112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jeong, I. H., Choi, J. Y., Kim, S.-H., Hyun, J.-W., Joung, A., Lee, J., et al. (2017). Normal-appearing white matter demyelination in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Eur. J. Neurol. 24, 652–658. doi: 10.1111/ene.13266

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koenig, S. H. (1991). Cholesterol of myelin is the determinant of gray-white contrast in MRI of brain. Magn. Reson. Med. 20, 285–291. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910200210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, J., Shin, H.-G., Jung, W., Nam, Y., Oh, S.-H., and Lee, J. (2017). An R2* model of white matter for fiber orientation and myelin concentration. Neuroimage 162, 269–275. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Love, S. (2006). Demyelinating diseases. J. Clin. Pathol. 59, 1151–1159. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.031195

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lutti, A., Dick, F., Sereno, M. I., and Weiskopf, N. (2014). Using high-resolution quantitative mapping of R1 as an index of cortical myelination. Neuroimage 93, 176–188. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Metere, R., Kober, T., Möller, H. E., and Schäfer, A. (2017). Simultaneous quantitative MRI Mapping of T1, T2* and magnetic susceptibility with multi-echo MP2RAGE. PLoS One 12:e0169265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169265

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mierzwa, A. J., Marion, C. M., Sullivan, G. M., McDaniel, D. P., and Armstrong, R. C. (2015). Components of myelin damage and repair in the progression of white matter pathology after mild traumatic brain injury. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 74, 218–232. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0000000000000165

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miot-Noirault, E., Barantin, L., Akoka, S., and Le Pape, A. (1997). T2 relaxation time as a marker of brain myelination: experimental MR study in two neonatal animal models. J. Neurosci. Methods 72, 5–14. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0270(96)00148-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mori, S., Oishi, K., Jiang, H., Jiang, L., Li, X., Akhter, K., et al. (2008). Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template. Neuroimage 40, 570–582. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9, 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Papuć, E., and Rejdak, K. (2018). The role of myelin damage in Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Arch. Med. Sci. 16, 345–351. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2018.76863

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rolls, E. T., Huang, C.-C., Lin, C.-P., Feng, J., and Joliot, M. (2020). Automated anatomical labelling atlas 3. Neuroimage 206:116189. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116189

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sacchet, M. D., and Gotlib, I. H. (2017). Myelination of the brain in Major Depressive Disorder: an in vivo quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. Sci. Rep. 7:2200. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02062-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salzer, J. L. (2015). Schwann Cell myelination. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7:a020529. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020529

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmierer, K., Scaravilli, F., Altmann, D. R., Barker, G. J., and Miller, D. H. (2004). Magnetization transfer ratio and myelin in postmortem multiple sclerosis brain. Ann. Neurol. 56, 407–415. doi: 10.1002/ana.20202

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sereno, M. I., Lutti, A., Weiskopf, N., and Dick, F. (2013). Mapping the human cortical surface by combining quantitative T1 with retinotopy†. Cereb. Cortex 23, 2261–2268. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, H., Hu, X., Leak, R. K., Shi, Y., An, C., Suenaga, J., et al. (2015). Demyelination as a rational therapeutic target for ischemic or traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 272, 17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.03.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sigalovsky, I. S., Fischl, B., and Melcher, J. R. (2006). Mapping an intrinsic MR property of gray matter in auditory cortex of living humans: a possible marker for primary cortex and hemispheric differences. Neuroimage 32, 1524–1537. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stüber, C., Morawski, M., Schäfer, A., Labadie, C., Wähnert, M., Leuze, C., et al. (2014). Myelin and iron concentration in the human brain: a quantitative study of MRI contrast. Neuroimage 93, 95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thrippleton, M., Blair, G., Valdes-Hernandez, M., Glatz, A., Semple, S., Doubal, F., et al. (2019). MRI relaxometry for quantitative analysis of USPIO uptake in cerebral small vessel disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20:776. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030776

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Todorich, B., Pasquini, J. M., Garcia, C. I., Paez, P. M., and Connor, J. R. (2009). Oligodendrocytes and myelination: the role of iron. Glia 57, 467–478. doi: 10.1002/glia.20784

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wood, J. C., Enriquez, C., Ghugre, N., Tyzka, J. M., Carson, S., Nelson, M. D., et al. (2005). MRI R2 and R2* mapping accurately estimates hepatic iron concentration in transfusion-dependent thalassemia and sickle cell disease patients. Blood 106, 1460–1465. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-10-3982

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: myelin-related map, relaxation times, ratio mapping, ME-MP2RAGE, 7T MRI

Citation: Shim J-M, Cho S-E, Kang S-G and Kang C-K (2022) Quantitative myelin-related maps from R1 and T2* ratio images using a single ME-MP2RAGE sequence in 7T MRI. Front. Neuroanat. 16:950650. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2022.950650

Received: 23 May 2022; Accepted: 05 August 2022;
Published: 25 August 2022.

Edited by:

Basilis Zikopoulos, Boston University, United States

Reviewed by:

Manojkumar Saranathan, University of Massachusetts Medical School, United States
Christopher Dennis Rowley, McGill University, Canada

Copyright © 2022 Shim, Cho, Kang and Kang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Seung-Gul Kang, a2FuZ3NnQGdhY2hvbi5hYy5rcg==; Chang-Ki Kang, Y2trYW5nQGdhY2hvbi5hYy5rcg==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.