Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Aging Neurosci., 05 May 2023
Sec. Neurocognitive Aging and Behavior
This article is part of the Research Topic Hippocampal Mechanisms in Aging and Clinical Memory Decline View all 5 articles

Editorial: Hippocampal mechanisms in aging and clinical memory decline

  • 1Center for Dementia Research, Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, NY, United States
  • 2Department of Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
  • 3Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
  • 4NYU Neuroscience Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
  • 5Vascular Cognitive Impairment, Neurodegeneration and Healthy Brain Aging Program, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States
  • 6Department of Health Promotion Sciences, College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States
  • 7The Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States

One of the most common cognitive problems that arises during the course of human senescence is a progressive decline in memory. Elders who otherwise live independent and robust lives often complain of forgetting or misplacing items as part of their daily activities. This is not a great revelation for any individual who interacts with an older family member, friend, or acquaintance. On face value, this may be considered one of the vagaries of aging. In fact, age-related memory loss has been the fodder of entertainment and literature for millennia. However, a deeper evaluation reveals many nuances regarding memory loss and potential opportunities to improve peoples' lives with mnemonic preservation.

Memory encompasses many modalities, including acquisition, encoding, processing, and recall, among others (Squire, 1986). Any one of these flash points can falter. There are short-term forms and long-term forms of memory. Not all aspects of memory are the same in terms of underlying structure, function, physiology, or mechanism of action. Accordingly, aging impacts what we broadly call “memory” in various ways. Some memory processing dysfunction is a common feature of what might be considered normal aging (Harada et al., 2013). However, progressive and pervasive memory decline that leads to loss of daily activity, social interactions, and deterioration of quality-of-life is associated with neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer's disease (AD) (Alzheimer's Association, 2023), is a devastating condition and a worldwide public health issue.

Rigorous and reproducible studies in live humans, postmortem human brains, and relevant animal models of aging and memory, including precise neuroanatomical tracing, neuroimaging, molecular, cellular, physiological, and behavioral studies have identified the hippocampal formation as the principal hub for mnemonic functions (Squire and Zola-Morgan, 1986; Rapp and Amaral, 1991; Huijgen and Samson, 2015). Not surprisingly, multiple components of the hippocampal formation are selectively vulnerable to cell, dendritic, and synapse loss as well as being a primary site for AD hallmark pathology, notably senile plaques (SPs) composed of amyloid-beta peptides and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) composed of the microtubule binding protein tau (Alzheimer's Association, 2023).

Hippocampal disconnection (Hyman et al., 1984, 1990) has been well established in the context of the onset and progression of AD (now recognized as an AD spectrum) (Jack et al., 2019a,b). Specifically, cell-type specific hippocampal formation neurodegeneration and localization of SPs and NFTs are profusely distributed throughout the AD hippocampus, and are an essential component of the neuropathological diagnosis of AD and Alzheimer's disease related dementias (ADRD) (Hyman and Trojanowski, 1997; Jack et al., 2019a,b). Neurodegeneration and neuron loss occurs throughout the hippocampal input-output circuitry. This is notable within stellate cells of the entorhinal cortex that project to the dentate gyrus, and layer IV entorhinal neurons that receive input from the subicular complex, which is the outflow network of the hippocampus (Gomez-Isla et al., 1996). Degeneration of CAl pyramidal cells and NFTs is a hallmark of AD-related pathology (Ginsberg et al., 1999). Subicular neurons also degenerate, and abundant NITs are found throughout the subiculum and parahippocampal gyrus (Ginsberg et al., 1999). Because the entire hippocampal formation circuit is critical for memory processing (Squire, 1986), hippocampal disconnection is a primary driver of the pervasive memory dysfunction seen in aging and neurodegenerative disorders.

The Research Topic “Hippocampal mechanisms in aging and clinical memory decline” was conceived to highlight basic and translational research in human hippocampus and relevant animal models aiming to provide evidence-based scientific inquiry into mechanisms that drive memory loss in aging and AD/ADRD.

In an original article, Matuskova et al., designed a series of experiments to interrogate underlying structural drivers of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) often associated with pathological aging, including AD, in a healthy aging memory clinic cohort of elders employing the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C) tool. The authors found the entorhinal cortex was associated with total score MBI-C performance. Moreover, in this nondemented cohort, NPS is associated with medial temporal lobe atrophy, which indicates the MBI-C may be useful for early identification of individuals with NPS who are at a higher risk for dementia.

Leveraging recent findings that Vang-Gogh like 2 (Vangl2), a key constituent of the planar cell polarity (PCP) signaling pathway, is localized to the adult murine dentate gyrus, Koehl et al., in an original article investigated the impact of Vangl2 on neurogenesis and memory in middle aged mice. Through the study of a Vangl2 mutant model construct, the authors demonstrate normal Vangl2 expression impacts granule cells born in adults and is a key regulator of cognitive flexibility. These provocative preclinical results suggest targeting Vangl2 may be useful in attenuating age-related memory decline.

In a systematic review, Zhou et al., evaluated five exercise regimens, aerobic training, combined training, high-intensity interval training, resistance training, and aerobic training plus resistance training, on serum levels of the neurotrophin brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in healthy aging and diseased cohorts. Bayesian network meta-analysis of 39 randomized controlled trials with 2,031 participants rank ordered resistance training as the optimal exercise approach for both children and elders in terms of sustaining serum BDNF levels to support CNS-related benefits.

Mukli et al., in an original article, tested the hypothesis that gait variability and gait asymmetry are reliable predictors of cognitive decline in elders with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). Cognitive performance, as measured by the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) and gait were evaluated in a cohort of elders with CSVD. Results indicate that step lengths in individuals with CSVD had greater asymmetry than controls. Moreover, gait variability had an inverse association with sustained attention, most notably in individuals with CSVD. These data are supportive of the concept that gait variability and asymmetry are viable predictors of cognitive decline in elders with CSVD.

The evidence presented in these articles complements the existing body of knowledge in the literature (Santín-Márquez et al., 2021; Kilimann et al., 2022; Kiss et al., 2022; Milicic et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022) by providing further insight into the hippocampal mechanisms of memory decline in aging and neurodegenerative disorders such as AD. Specifically, this Research Topic highlighted the critical role of the hippocampal formation in memory processing and the selective vulnerability of this brain region to neurodegeneration, synaptic loss, and the accumulation of hallmark pathologies such as SPs and NFTs. These studies provide new evidence and insights into the mechanisms of memory decline in aging and neurodegenerative disorders and potential interventions for improving cognitive function in older adults.

A general caveat regarding this Research Topic, “Hippocampal mechanisms in aging and clinical memory decline” is that it is not possible to articulate all of the basic, translational, and clinical research components driving memory decline in aging in the context of a circumscribed set of manuscripts on this broad topic. Rather, a stated goal of the Research Topic series in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is to increase awareness and interest in an underserved area with significant public health importance to the aging community writ large. It is our hope this special issue drives greater interest and encourages new investigators from other scientific backgrounds to begin studying aspects of memory dysfunction in aging and AD/ADRD.

Author contributions

SDG and ST wrote and edited the manuscript and take responsibility data integrity of and the accuracy presented herein. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was supported by grants AG014449, AG017617, AG072599, AG074004, and AG077103 to SDG from the National Institutes of Health. This work was also supported by grants from the American Heart Association (AHA 941290 to ST), AG070479 and AG073614 to ST from the National Institutes of Health, the Oklahoma Shared Clinical and Translational Resources, the NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA225520) and the Oklahoma Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Alzheimer's Association. (2023). 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 19, 1598–1695. doi: 10.1002/alz.13016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

Ginsberg, S. D., Schmidt, M. L., Crino, P. B., Eberwine, J. H., Lee, V. M.-Y., and Trojanowski, J. Q. (1999). “Molecular pathology of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders,” in Cerebral Cortex, vol. 14. Neurodegenerative and Age-related Changes in Structure and Function of Cerebral Cortex, Peters, A., and Morrison, J. H. (eds). (New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum) p. 603–653. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4885-0_17

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gomez-Isla, T., Price, J. L., Mckeel, J.r,. D. W, Morris, J. C., Growdon, J. H., et al. (1996). Profound loss of Layer II entorhinal cortex neurons occurs in very mild Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci. 16, 4491–4500. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-14-04491.1996

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harada, C. N., Natelson Love, M. C., and Triebel, K. L. (2013). Normal cognitive aging. Clin Geriatr. Med. 29, 737–752. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2013.07.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huijgen, J., and Samson, S. (2015). The hippocampus: a central node in a large-scale brain network for memory. Rev Neurol (Paris). 171, 204–216. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2015.01.557

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hyman, B. T., and Trojanowski, J. Q. (1997). Consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer disease from the National Institute on Aging and the Reagan Institute Working Group on diagnostic criteria for the neuropathological assessment of Alzheimer disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 56, 1095–1097. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199710000-00002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hyman, B. T., Van Hoesen, G. W., and Damasio, A. R. (1990). Memory-related neural systems in Alzheimer's disease: an anatomic study. Neurology. 40, 1721–1730. doi: 10.1212/WNL.40.11.1721

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hyman, B. T., Van Hoesen, G. W., Damasio, A. R., and Barnes, C. L. (1984). Alzheimer's disease: cell-specific pathology isolates the hippocampal formation. Science. 225, 1168–1170. doi: 10.1126/science.6474172

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jack, C. R. Jr., Therneau, T. M., Weigand, S. D., Wiste, H. J., Knopman, D. S., Vemuri, P., et al. (2019a). Prevalence of biologically vs clinically defined Alzheimer spectrum entities using the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association Research framework. JAMA Neurol. 76, 1174–1183. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1971

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jack, C. R. Jr., Wiste, H. J., Therneau, T. M., Weigand, S. D., Knopman, D. S., Mielke, M. M., et al. (2019b). Associations of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration biomarker profiles with rates of memory decline among individuals without dementia. JAMA. 321, 2316–2325. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7437

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kilimann, I., Wucherer, D., Ittermann, T., Völzke, H., Bülow, R., Hoffmann, W., et al. (2022). Inverse association between the anticholinergic burden and hippocampus volume in a population-based cohort across the entire adult age range. Geroscience. 44, 1715–1726. doi: 10.1007/s11357-021-00497-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kiss, T., Nyúl-Tóth, Á., Delfavero, J., Balasubramanian, P., Tarantini, S., Faakye, J., et al. (2022). Spatial transcriptomic analysis reveals inflammatory foci defined by senescent cells in the white matter, hippocampi and cortical grey matter in the aged mouse brain. Geroscience. 44, 661–681. doi: 10.1007/s11357-022-00521-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Milicic, L., Vacher, M., Porter, T., Dor,é, V., Burnham, S. C., Bourgeat, P., et al. (2022). Comprehensive analysis of epigenetic clocks reveals associations between disproportionate biological ageing and hippocampal volume. Geroscience. 44, 1807–1823. doi: 10.1007/s11357-022-00558-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rapp, P. R., and Amaral, D. G. (1991). Recognition memory deficits in a subpopulation of aged monkeys resemble the effects of medial temporal lobe damage. Neurobiol. Aging. 12, 481–486. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(91)90077-W

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Santín-Márquez, R., Ramírez-Cordero, B., Toledo-Pérez, R., Luna-López, A., López-Diazguerrero, N. E., Hernández-Arciga, U., et al. (2021). Sensory and memory processing in old female and male Wistar rat brain, and its relationship with the cortical and hippocampal redox state. Geroscience. 43, 1899–1920. doi: 10.1007/s11357-021-00353-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Squire, L. R. (1986). Mechanisms of memory. Science. 232, 1612–1619. doi: 10.1126/science.3086978

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Squire, L. R., and Zola-Morgan, S. (1986). Memory: brain systems and behavior. Trends Neurosci. 11, 170–175. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(88)90144-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Roman, R. J., and Fan, F. (2022). Hippocampus is more susceptible to hypoxic injury: has the Rosetta Stone of regional variation in neurovascular coupling been deciphered? Geroscience. 44, 127–130. doi: 10.1007/s11357-021-00449-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: hippocampus, memory, aging, Alzheimer's disease, Alzheimer's disease related dementias

Citation: Ginsberg SD and Tarantini S (2023) Editorial: Hippocampal mechanisms in aging and clinical memory decline. Front. Aging Neurosci. 15:1204954. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1204954

Received: 13 April 2023; Accepted: 17 April 2023;
Published: 05 May 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Kristy A. Nielson, Marquette University, United States

Copyright © 2023 Ginsberg and Tarantini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Stephen D. Ginsberg, ginsberg@nki.rfmh.org

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.