Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging Neurosci., 13 September 2022
Sec. Parkinson’s Disease and Aging-related Movement Disorders

Iron deposition heterogeneity in extrapyramidal system assessed by quantitative susceptibility mapping in Parkinson’s disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

  • Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China

Purpose: Excessive brain iron depositions were found in both patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The present study aimed to explore iron deposition and heterogeneity in the extrapyramidal system in PD patients with T2DM using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and further to reveal the effect of T2DM on the changes in brain iron in patients with PD.

Materials and methods: A total of 38 PD patients with T2DM (PDDM), 30 PD patients without T2DM (PDND), and 20 asymptomatic control subjects (CSs) were recruited for this study. All subjects underwent multiple MRI sequences involving enhanced gradient echo T2 star weighted angiography (ESWAN). The magnetic sensitivity values (MSV) and volume of the whole nuclei (MSVW, VW) and high iron region (MSVRII, VRII) were measured on the bilateral caudate nucleus (CN), the putamen (PUT), the globus pallidus (GP), the substantia nigra (SN), the red nucleus (RN) and the dentate nucleus (DN). Clinical and laboratory data were recorded, especially for the Hoehn and Yahr (H-Y) stage, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA). All QSM data were compared between PDDM and PDND groups and correlated with clinical and laboratory data.

Results: Compared to the PDND group, the VRII/VW of the left CN was significantly increased in the PDDM group. Significantly higher MSVW and MSVRII were also found in the PDDM group, including bilateral SN of MSVW, right PUT, and bilateral CN, GP, and SN of MSVRII. The H-Y stage of the PDDM group was significantly higher than that of the PDND group. The MSVRII of bilateral RN of the PDDM group was positively correlated with the HAMA scores. HDL, DBP, and SBP levels were associated with MSVRII of right CN in the PDDM group.

Conclusion: T2DM could aggravate the disease severity and anxiety in patients with PD. The iron distribution of deep gray matter nuclei in PD patients with T2DM was significantly heterogeneous, which was related to blood pressure and blood lipids.

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common aging-related chronic neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. Recently, some epidemiological studies demonstrated that T2DM can increase the risk of PD (Schernhammer et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2011; Cereda et al., 2012; Yue et al., 2016). An analysis of a large-scale cohort involving 15 million subjects found that the risk of PD increases significantly with the duration of diabetes and hyperglycemia (DM 5 years HR = 1.618; 95% CI: 1.566–1.672) (Rhee et al., 2020). The molecular biology study has suggested that PD and T2DM are connected (Chang et al., 2021), and the mechanisms include mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum dysfunction, inflammation, and changes in glucose metabolism.

The clinical manifestations of PD are mainly extrapyramidal symptoms (Pfeiffer, 2007), and previous studies found a clear relationship between abnormal extrapyramidal iron deposition and clinical symptoms (Pesch et al., 2019; Guan et al., 2020). Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) has been proved to be an optimal modality for iron content detection of the brain in vivo. Thus, QSM is widely used for detecting overdose of iron deposition to assist PD diagnosis. It can accurately reflect both the spatial distribution of tissue susceptibility and the quantitative information of the regional iron content within gray nuclei (Xiao et al., 2019). The red nucleus (RN) and the substantia nigra (SN) are the main target structures of iron anomaly deposition in patients with PD (Costa-Mallen et al., 2017). In addition, the disappearance of “swallow’s tail sign” in the SN is considered one of the imaging indicators for PD diagnosis (Calloni et al., 2018). T2DM is associated with chronic brain injury, including microvascular complications, neuronal degeneration, and apoptosis of dopamine neurologic cells (Ferris et al., 2020). Excessive brain iron depositions have been found in the caudate nucleus (CN), the pallidum, the putamen (PUT), and the frontal precentral gyrus in patients with T2DM (Li et al., 2020a). Both patients with PD and T2DM have iron deposition in the brain; however, the main targets for iron deposition are different, and clinical manifestations are also inconsistent.

Bartzokis et al.’s (2007) study confirmed that the distribution of iron in the brain is heterogeneous, even in the deep gray matter nuclei. However, most of the current studies use the mean value of the whole structure of the deep gray matter nuclei to reflect the iron content, which can not sufficiently reflect the heterogeneity of iron distribution. At present, there is no study on iron deposition in PD patients with T2DM as well as its clinical correlation. As the results indicate, we used the QSM threshold method to explore brain iron deposition and heterogeneity in PD with T2DM patients and to further reveal the effect of T2DM on the changes of brain iron in patients with PD.

Materials and methods

Participants

This retrospective study was approved by the hospital ethics committee (PJ-KS-KY-2021-121). All patients were admitted to the Department of Neurology in our hospital. A total of 68 clinically diagnosed patients with PD from June 2016 to April 2021 were enrolled and recorded as the PD group. The PD diagnosis criteria adopted the 2015 Movement Disorders Society (MDS) criteria for Parkinson’s disease diagnosis (Postuma et al., 2015). The exclusion criteria of the PD group included (a) secondary Parkinson’s syndrome, Parkinson’s superimposed syndrome, and other neurodegenerative diseases; (b) a history of brain tumor, serious head trauma, stroke, neurologic or psychiatric diseases, and large-vessel disease and diseases with white matter lesions; (c) other brain diseases related to iron deposition; (d) recently taken foods or drugs that affect iron metabolism; (e) deep brain stimulator (DBS) implanted in the patients; (f) acute complications of T2DM occurred within 3 months before the examination, such as ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycemia; and (g) MRI scan contraindications. The PD group was ulteriorly divided into two subgroups according to whether PD was complicated with T2DM, the PDDM (PD with T2DM) group (38 cases, 23 males, mean age: 67.50 ± 7.44 years) and the PDND (PD without T2DM) group (30 cases, 18 males, mean age: 66.20 ± 9.22 years). The diagnosis criteria of T2DM met the T2DM diagnostic criteria (American Diabetes Association criteria) (American Diabetes Association, 2018). In addition, 20 control subjects (CS) constituted the CS group (20 cases, 12 males, mean age: 67.56 ± 8.11 years). The CS group was collected to define the threshold of iron content measured by QSM. The inclusion criteria of the CS group were as follows: (a) age- and gender-matched with that of the PDDM and PDND groups and (b) no history of T2DM or PD. The exclusion criteria of the CS group were the same as that of the PD group. All subjects were right-handed. Clinical and laboratory data of PD patients were collected, including gender, age, course of disease, years of education, systolic pressure (SBP), diastolic pressure (DBP), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), homocysteine levels (HCY), uric acid (UA), and free glucose levels. Neuropsychological scale scores including the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), and the Hoehn and Yahr stage (H-Y) were also collected in all patients.

MRI acquisition

All subjects underwent a routine MRI and enhanced gradient echo T2 star weighted angiography (ESWAN) on a 3.0T GE Signa HDXT scanner from America with a dedicated eight-channel head coil. The ESWAN parameters were kept the same (TR = 36 ms, TE = 3.6 ms; 7.8 ms; 11.9 ms; 16.1 ms; 20.3 ms; 2 4.4 ms; 28.6 ms; 32.8 ms, FOV = 24 cm2 × 24 cm2, slice thickness = 1 mm, slice gap = 0 mm, matrix = 256 × 256).

Quantitative susceptibility mapping post-processing and measurement

The ESWAN raw images were downloaded in the form of DICOM from GE Advantage Workstation 4.6, and Signal Processing in nuclear magnetic resonance (SPIN) software was used for the post-processing of ESWAN images. SPIN software was used to distinguish the original amplitude map and the phase map of ESWAN images; then, the QSM image was obtained by processing the original amplitude and the phase map by the susceptibility weighted imaging mapping (SWIM) module in the software.

The regions of interest (ROIs) were selected in the bilateral extrapyramidal system, including the CN, the PUT, the globus pallidus (GP), the SN, the RN, and the dentate nucleus (DN), as seen in Figures 1A–C. The ROIs were drawn manually along the edge of each nucleus at three successive slices. For the nuclei with small anatomical structures, such as RN and SN, ROIs were measured three times at the largest slice. The ventricle and vessel were avoided when sketching. The three measurements of each nucleus (averaged for iron content and added for volume) were recorded as magnetic susceptibility value (MSV), providing the quantitative information resulting from brain iron deposition. The iron deposition throughout each nucleus was inhomogeneous (Figures 1D–F). To more accurately evaluate the iron content in the nucleus, an MSV threshold from the CS group was calculated to define regions of high iron content (R II). According to the study of Haacke et al. (2007), the MSV threshold of each nucleus was generated by the mean plus two standard deviations (Table 1). The MSV of the whole nucleus (MSVW) and the R II region (MSVRII) were recorded, as well as the volumes of the whole nucleus (VW) and the R II region (VRII) were done. After 7 months, the same doctor measured the QSM parameters of all patients with PD again.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. A 61-year-old female of PDDM group. Regions of interest selected on susceptibility maps. (A) Green-caudate nucleus; orange-putamen; blue-globus pallidus; (B) Red-substantia nigra; yellow-red nucleus; (C) purple-dentate nucleus. Panels (D–F) were based on the MSV threshold, the purple regions were the obtained high iron content region of the corresponding nuclei. (D) Right caudate nucleus; (E) right globus pallidus; (F) right putamen.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The MSV threshold of gray matter nuclei in brain (from CS).

Statistical analyses

Data analyses were performed using SPSS (version 26.0). To evaluate the reliability of the interobserver, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. Independent-samples t-test (for normally distributed data) or the Mann–Whitney U test (for non-normally distributed data) were used to compare the MSVw, MSVRII, VW, VRII, VRII/VW, and clinical data between two groups. The Pearson correlation analysis (for normally distributed data) or the Spearman correlation analysis (for non-normally distributed data) was used to analyze the relations between MSVRII and the MMSE score, the MoCA score, the HAMA score, the HAMD score, and the H-Y stage in the PDDM group. A false discovery rate (FDR) was performed to correct the multiple comparisons. A multiple linear regression analysis analyzed independent related factors of the MSVRII in the PDDM group. In order to eliminate the collinearity among independent variables, the TG and LDL were removed from the independent variables after the collinearity analysis of independent variables.

Results

Subject characteristics

The clinical laboratory indicators, the H-Y stage, and neuropsychological scale assessments are summarized in Table 2. Except for free glucose levels (P = 0.000), there were no differences in the clinical data and clinical laboratory indicators (gender, age, course, years of education, SBP, DBP, TC, TG, HDL, LDL, UA, and HCY levels) between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Compared to the PDND group, a significant increase in the H-Y stage (P = 0.011) score was found in the PDDM group, while the MMSE score, the MoCA score, the HAMA score, and the HAMD score were also found to be higher but without a statistic difference.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The clinical, laboratory and neuropsychological data of PDDM group and PDND group.

Magnetic sensitivity values changes between Parkinson’s disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus group and Parkinson’s disease patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus group

The ICC analysis showed that all measured values had excellent inter-rater consistency (0.852–0.935). Compared to the PDND group, the MSVW of the PDDM group was increased in most of the nuclei, except for left DN. Differences were only found in the right SN (P = 0.036, FDR correction) and the left SN (P = 0.012, FDR correction) (Table 3; Figure 2). MSVRII was significantly increased in the right PUT, the bilateral SN, the CN, and the GP in the PDDM group (all P<0.05, FDR correction) (Table 4; Figure 2).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. MSVW of gray matter nucleus between PDDM group and PDND group.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Comparisons of MSVw and MSVRII of gray matter nucleus in brain between PDDM and PDND group. The results in the figures showed that iron deposition in the PDDM group was greater than that in the PDND group in most nuclei except for the R-DN. For MSVw, there were significant differences in the R-SN and L-SN (A); For MSVRII, there were significant differences in the R-CN, L-CN, R-PUT, R-GP, L-GP, R-SN, and L-SN (B). *P < 0.05. MSVW, MSV of the whole nuclei; MSVRII, MSV of the high iron region; PDDM, PD with T2DM; PDND, PD without 20 T2DM; R, right; L, left; CN, caudate nucleus; PUT, putamen; GP, globus pallidus; SN, substantia nigra; RN, red nucleus; DN, dentate nucleus.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. MSVRII of gray matter nucleus between PDDM group and PDND group.

Volume changes between Parkinson’s disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus group and Parkinson’s disease patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus group

There was no significant difference in VW and VRII between the two groups (Tables 5, 6). Nevertheless, compared to the PDND group, a difference was found in VRII/VW of the left CN (P = 0.048, FDR correction), and the VRII/VW increased in the PDDM group (Table 7; Figure 3).

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. VW of gray matter nucleus between PDDM group and PDND group.

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. VRII of gray matter nucleus between PDDM group and PDND group.

TABLE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Table 7. VRII/VW of gray matter nucleus between PDDM group and PDND group.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Comparisons of VRII/VW of gray matter nucleus in brain between PDDM group and PDND group. The results in the figure showed that VRII/VW in the PDDM group were greater than that in the PDND group in most nuclei. There was significant differences in the L-CN. *P < 0.05. VW, volume of the whole nuclei; VRII, volume of the high iron region; PDDM, PD with T2DM; PDND, PD without T2DM; R, right; L, left; CN, caudate nucleus; PUT, putamen; GP, globus pallidus; SN, substantia nigra; RN, red nucleus; DN, dentate nucleus.

Correlation of magnetic sensitivity values and the Hoehn and Yahr Stage, neuropsychiatric test scores in Parkinson’s disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus group

The MSVRII of the right CN (r = 0.449, P = 0.032) and the left CN (r = 0.424, P = 0.044) showed a positive correlation with the HAMA scores in the PDDM group (Figure 4). There was no relationship between MSV and the other Neuropsychiatric test scores as well as the H-Y Stage.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Correlation of MSVRII and HAMA scores in PDDM Group. Positive correlation between MSVRII of R-RN, L-CN and HAMA score in PDDM group. MSVRII, MSV of the high iron region; PDDM, PD with T2DM; R-CN, right-caudate nucleus; L-CN, left-caudate nucleus; HAMA, Hamilton anxiety scale.

Clinical factors of MSVRII in the Parkinson’s disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus group

Multiple linear regression showed that, in the right CN, the MSVRII was positively correlated with the SBP level (B = 0.409, β = 0.488, R2 = 0.227, P = 0.021) and was negatively correlated with the DBP (B = -0.634, β = -0.482, R2 = 0.227, P = 0.023) and HDL levels (B = -17.835, β = -0.458, R2 = 0.227, P = 0.023) (Figure 5). The regression equation was shown as MSVRII = 137.998 + 0.409 × SBP - 0.634 × DBP - 17.835 × HDL.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. The results of multiple linear regression. (A) SBP level (B = 0.409, β = 0.488, R2 = 0.227, P = 0.021) was positively correlated with MSVRII of R-CN in PDDM group. (B) DBP level (B = -0.634, β = -0.482, R2 = 0.227, P = 0.023) was negatively correlated with MSVRII of R-CN in PDDM group. (C) HDL level (B = -17.835, β = -0.458, R2 = 0.227, P = 0.023) was negatively correlated with MSVRII of R-CN in PDDM patients. MSVRII, MSV of the high iron region; PDDM, PD with T2DM; R-CN, right caudate nucleus; SBP, systolic pressure; DBP, diastolic pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein.

Discussion

In the present study, we used the QSM threshold method to compare and analyze the iron content in both the high iron zone and the whole iron zone in the deep gray matter nuclei of the PDDM and PDND groups. It was found that T2DM aggravated not only extrapyramidal iron deposition but also its homogeneity in patients with PD. In addition, we also found that, although T2DM did not affect the whole volume of gray matter nuclei in patients with PD, it increased the relative volume of high-iron areas in the gray matter nuclei, further indicating that T2DM leads to uneven iron distribution in gray matter nuclei in patients with PD. We also found that SBP, DBP, and HDL were independent influencing factors of iron distribution in patients with PDDM.

The central nervous system requires iron for many metabolic processes, and it will suffer from disturbed function whether the iron is excessive or lacking. Iron plays a pivotal role in many physiological functions, including neuronal metabolism, DNA synthesis, oxygen transport, mitochondrial respiration, nerve transmission, and myelination (Sian-Hülsmann et al., 2011). Excessive iron in cells catalyzes the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can damage DNA and proteins. However, the deficiency of cellular iron can lead to cell death. Disordered iron metabolism occurs at multiple different parts, including iron uptake and release, storage, intracellular metabolism, and regulation. T2DM is a risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Systemic insulin resistance presenting in T2DM is well known to be a hallmark of T2DM at the cellular level. It is related to prediabetic lesions that ultimately lead to the occurrence of T2DM (Hong et al., 2020). Glucose is almost the only energy source for brain tissue. Energy metabolism disorder is one of the important characteristics of central nervous system diseases. Hyperglycemia can cause chronic damage to the central nervous system. Diabetes represents a persistent state of hyperglycemia which aggravates neurological damage to the central nervous system. Brain iron deposition has considered to be the pathomechanism of T2DM patients with cognitive impairment. In this study, we found that T2DM further exacerbated the disease progression of patients with PD. This result suggested that T2DM might be a risk factor for aggravating brain injury in patients with PD. Brain iron contents in the deep brain gray matters are increased with age even under the physiological status (Ghassaban et al., 2019).

Hoehn and Yahr stage and neuropsychiatric test scores differences between the Parkinson’s disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus group and the Parkinson’s disease patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus group

Our results showed that H-Y staging in the PDDM group was significantly higher than that in the PDND group, and there were no significant differences in cognitive scores, depression, and anxiety symptoms between the two groups. Our results suggested that T2DM would accelerate the disease process in patients with PD. One case-control research indicated that PD patients with T2DM scored higher on the severity scale including the H-Y stage than those with PD (Cereda et al., 2012). A retrospective study with 72 patients with PD indicated that patients accompanied with T2DM developed motor complications 12 months in advance (Mohamed Ibrahim et al., 2018). The above views were consistent with our results. Similarly, a cohort study revealed that patients with T2DM had a lower binding rate of dopamine transporter in striatal and accelerated cognitive and motor decline (Pagano et al., 2018).

MSVW and MSVRII changes between the Parkinson’s disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus group and the Parkinson’s disease patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus group

In out study, we found that, compared to the PDND group, the iron contents in the bilateral SN were increased in the PDDM group for the whole nucleus area, which suggests that T2DM may aggravate the local iron deposition in the gray matter nuclei of patients with PD. Previous studies showed that iron accumulation in the SN of patients with PD is abnormal, especially in the dense part of the SN. Studies found excessive iron accumulation in the SN and the RN of patients with PD (Costa-Mallen et al., 2017). Excessive iron deposition in the SN produces substances such as reactive oxygen species, stimulates the formation of α-synuclein, and then accelerates the degeneration and necrosis of dopamine neurons (Bagetta et al., 2010). In addition, Li Jing found that patients with T2DM had a higher iron content in the basal ganglia nucleus (Li et al., 2020b). We proposed that the overdose of iron in the RN and the basal ganglia nucleus may be associated with the reactive oxygen species and its corresponding response, as well as in the SN. According to previous investigations by QSM on brain iron deposition in patients with T2DM, T2DM patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have significantly higher MSVs in the left PUT compared to T2DM patients without MCI (Yang et al., 2018). Based on this, we suggest that T2DM might affect iron deposition in patients with PD.

The distribution of iron in the gray matter nuclei is uneven (Haacke et al., 2007). To further understand the distribution of iron in the nucleus, we subdivided the gray matter nucleus into the R II region and the R I region by threshold. We found that the whole iron content differed between groups only in the bilateral SN region but showed more between-group differences in the R II region, mainly manifested in bilateral CN, the right PUT, the bilateral GP, and the bilateral SN. Using the threshold method to measure MSV in the R II region can more sensitively reflect the abnormal distribution of brain iron in the nucleus. The results well explain that T2DM may aggravate the heterogeneity of iron distribution in the PD gray matter nuclei, driving more iron to distribute to the R II region. Heterogeneity in iron distribution may be related to differences in blood supply and function of the intranuclear substructure, as well as local iron storage, absorption, and transport statuses. Wang et al. found that, for the CN, the high iron deposition was concentrated in the area near the drainage vein. The high iron deposition of the PUT was mainly concentrated in the lower outer and lower inner regions; In the SN, the iron deposition was mainly in the compact region (Wang et al., 2012). We hypothesized that T2DM would affect the heterogeneity of iron distribution in the gray matter nuclei of the brain in patients with PD. At present, the mechanism of how T2DM aggravates the uneven distribution of PD iron deposition is still unclear, especially the extra distribution in the R II region, and further research is needed.

VW, VRII, and VRII/VW differences between the Parkinson’s disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus group and the Parkinson’s disease patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus group

Also, we found that there were no differences in VW and VRII between the two groups. We suggested that T2DM did not affect the volume of gray matter nucleus in patients with PD. Through FreeSurfer analysis, Pagano et al. showed no differences in subcortical nuclei volumes between the PDDM group and the PDND group (Pagano et al., 2018). Rosenberg et al. (2019) summarized the results of 21 studies and found no significant changes in the gray matter volume between patients with T2DM and healthy controls. Ji Chen et al. measured gray matter volume through morphological analysis, and the results showed that T2DM was associated with focal atrophy of bilateral CN. In contrast, voxel-based morphometry (VBM) measurement showed no significant difference in gray matter volume between the T2DM group and the normal group (Chen et al., 2017). Crutcher et al.’s study showed the basal ganglia nucleus atrophy in patients with PD (Crutcher and DeLong, 1984). However, the VRII/VW in the left CN was increased significantly in the PDDM group compared to the PDND group. Considering the differences in the brain gray matter volume among individuals, VRII/VW was calculated for a more precise understanding of the iron distribution in the R II region, and we found that the VRII/VW of most nuclei in the PDDM group were higher than those in the PDND groupand that a significant difference was observed for the left CN, which shows that, when the nuclei volume between the two groups is the same, the volume of the R II region in the PDDM group is significantly larger than that in the PDND group. T2DM drives the distribution of iron to the R II region, further demonstrating that T2DM aggravates the heterogeneity of iron distribution in the PD gray matter nuclei.

Correlation the MSVRII with the Hoehn and Yahr stage and neuropsychiatric test scores in the Parkinson’s disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus group

Our result indicated that the MSVRII of the bilateral RN was positively correlated with the HAMA score. The HAMA score was consistent with the anxiety level. Thus, higher MSV indicates higher iron deposition in the brain; the higher the anxiety scores the more severe the anxiety level. Anxiety is the result of neurochemical changes in the disease itself or psychological responses to the stress of the disease (Walsh and Bennett, 2001). Anxiety is a common non-motor symptom of PD and T2DM because they are all chronic progressive diseases. Pellegrino found that iron deposited in specific areas of neural tissue led to selective activation of neurons and anxiety-like behaviors developed (Pellegrino et al., 2016).

Independent influence factors of MSVRII in Parkinson’s disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

In our study, the SBP level was an independent risk factor for MSVRII in patients with PDDM, the higher the SBP level the more the iron deposition in the brain; HDL and DBP were independent protective factors for MSVRII in patients with PDDM, and maintaining normal HDL (our hospital standard is greater 1.04) and SBP levels is significant for maintaining iron deposition, and sometimes HDL can be higher than normal (the lowest and highest values in our patient is 0.72–2.02). Previous research showed that HDL was directly involved in anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects that would reduce iron release from ferritin and that inadequate HDL was associated with an increased risk of neuronal degeneration (Fotakis et al., 2019). HDL deficiency has been reported to contribute to cognitive decline by affecting atherosclerotic risk (Bahrami et al., 2019). In this study, HDL was negatively correlated with cerebral iron deposition in the PDDM group, which was consistent with previous research results. Besides, a recent study suggested that abnormal blood pressure has a negative impact on the cerebrovascular system in patients with PD (Yamashiro et al., 2018), which increased the permeability of the BBB, leading to increased iron deposition in the brain of patients with PD. Cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction characterized by abnormal arterial blood pressure patterns is part of the non-motor characteristic spectrum of PD (Tham et al., 2021).

Limitations

Our present study has some limitations: (1) The sample size was small; thus, a larger sample size is needed to reduce errors. (2) The ROIs in this study were manually placed, inevitably leading to some errors. (3) This study did not consider the effect of insulin and other drug treatments on brain iron deposition, which may interfere with the results to a certain extent. (4) The subthalamic nucleus is an essential structure in the extrapyramidal system. It failed to be accurately measured on QSM because of its small size and poor distinction from the adjacent organization. More accurate measurement methods are needed. (5) The age spectrum of patients in the PDDM and PDND groups included in this study was wide, and considering the influence of age on the iron content in neurodegenerative diseases, we need to stratify patients by age to refine the iron deposition changes further.

Conclusion

In summary, based on the QSM threshold method, we identified that T2DM could aggravate iron deposition and its heterogeneity in extrapyramidal gray matter nuclei in patients with PD, which was consistent with the severity and anxiety of the disease of PD. Iron deposition in patients with \PDDM correlates with HDL, DBP, and SBP, suggesting that managing blood pressure and blood lipids is necessary for patients with PDDM.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by PJ-KS-KY-2021-121. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

WL: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, visualization, and writing—original draft. BG: conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, and writing—original draft. WD, YJ, JY, RH, YL, NL, and YZ: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, and writing—reviewing and editing. QS: conceptualization, supervision, project administration, and writing—reviewing and editing. YM: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, supervision, and writing—reviewing and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81671646).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

American Diabetes Association (2018). 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care 41(Suppl 1), S13–S27. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bagetta, V., Ghiglieri, V., Sgobio, C., Calabresi, P., and Picconi, B. (2010). Synaptic dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 38, 493–497. doi: 10.1042/bst0380493

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bahrami, A., Barreto, G. E., Lombardi, G., Pirro, M., and Sahebkar, A. (2019). Emerging roles for high-density lipoproteins in neurodegenerative disorders. Biofactors 45, 725–739. doi: 10.1002/biof.1541

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bartzokis, G., Tishler, T. A., Lu, P. H., Villablanca, P., Altshuler, L. L., Carter, M., et al. (2007). Brain ferritin iron may influence age- and gender-related risks of neurodegeneration. Neurobiol. Aging 28, 414–423. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.02.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Calloni, S. F., Conte, G., Sbaraini, S., Cilia, R., Contarino, V. E., Avignone, S., et al. (2018). Multiparametric MR imaging of Parkinsonisms at 3 tesla: Its role in the differentiation of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease versus atypical Parkinsonian disorders. Eur. J. Radiol. 109, 95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.10.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cereda, E., Barichella, M., Cassani, E., Caccialanza, R., and Pezzoli, G. (2012). Clinical features of Parkinson disease when onset of diabetes came first: A case-control study. Neurology 78, 1507–1511. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182553cc9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, Y. H., Yen, S. J., Chang, Y. H., Wu, W. J., and Lin, K. D. (2021). Pioglitazone and statins lower incidence of Parkinson disease in patients with diabetes mellitus. Eur. J. Neurol. 28, 430–437. doi: 10.1111/ene.14542

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, J., Zhang, J., Liu, X., Wang, X., Xu, X., Li, H., et al. (2017). Abnormal subcortical nuclei shapes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur. Radiol. 27, 4247–4256. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4790-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Costa-Mallen, P., Gatenby, C., Friend, S., Maravilla, K. R., Hu, S. C., Cain, K. C., et al. (2017). Brain iron concentrations in regions of interest and relation with serum iron levels in Parkinson disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 378, 38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.04.035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Crutcher, M. D., and DeLong, M. R. (1984). Single cell studies of the primate putamen. I. Functional organization. Exp. Brain Res. 53, 233–243. doi: 10.1007/bf00238153

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferris, J. K., Inglis, J. T., Madden, K. M., and Boyd, L. A. (2020). Brain and body: A Review of central nervous system contributions to movement impairments in diabetes. Diabetes 69, 3–11. doi: 10.2337/db19-0321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fotakis, P., Kothari, V., Thomas, D. G., Westerterp, M., Molusky, M. M., Altin, E., et al. (2019). Anti-inflammatory effects of HDL (High-Density Lipoprotein) in macrophages predominate over proinflammatory effects in atherosclerotic plaques. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 39, e253–e272. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.119.313253

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ghassaban, K., He, N., Sethi, S. K., Huang, P., Chen, S., Yan, F., et al. (2019). Regional High iron in the substantia nigra differentiates Parkinson’s disease patients from healthy controls. Front. Aging Neurosci. 11:106. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guan, X., Guo, T., Zhou, C., Wu, J., Gao, T., Bai, X., et al. (2020). Asymmetrical nigral iron accumulation in Parkinson’s disease with motor asymmetry: An explorative, longitudinal and test-retest study. Aging (Albany NY) 12, 18622–18634. doi: 10.18632/aging.103870

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haacke, E. M., Ayaz, M., Khan, A., Manova, E. S., Krishnamurthy, B., Gollapalli, L., et al. (2007). Establishing a baseline phase behavior in magnetic resonance imaging to determine normal vs. Abnormal iron content in the brain. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 26, 256–264. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22987

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hong, C. T., Chen, K. Y., Wang, W., Chiu, J. Y., Wu, D., Chao, T. Y., et al. (2020). Insulin resistance promotes Parkinson’s disease through aberrant expression of α-synuclein, mitochondrial dysfunction, and deregulation of the polo-like kinase 2 signaling. Cells 9:740. doi: 10.3390/cells9030740

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Zhang, Q., Zhang, N., and Guo, L. (2020a). Increased Brain iron deposition in the putamen in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus detected by quantitative susceptibility mapping. J. Diabetes Res. 2020:7242530. doi: 10.1155/2020/7242530

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Zhang, Q., Zhang, N., and Guo, L. (2020b). Increased brain iron detection by voxel-based quantitative susceptibility mapping in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with an executive function decline. Front. Neurosci. 14:606182. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.606182

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mohamed Ibrahim, N., Ramli, R., Koya Kutty, S., and Shah, S. A. (2018). Earlier onset of motor complications in Parkinson’s patients with comorbid diabetes mellitus. Mov. Disord. 33, 1967–1968. doi: 10.1002/mds.27526

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pagano, G., Polychronis, S., Wilson, H., Giordano, B., Ferrara, N., Niccolini, F., et al. (2018). Diabetes mellitus and Parkinson disease. Neurology 90, e1654–e1662. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000005475

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pellegrino, R. M., Boda, E., Montarolo, F., Boero, M., Mezzanotte, M., Saglio, G., et al. (2016). Transferrin receptor 2 dependent alterations of brain iron metabolism affect anxiety circuits in the mouse. Sci. Rep. 6:30725. doi: 10.1038/srep30725

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pesch, B., Casjens, S., Woitalla, D., Dharmadhikari, S., Edmondson, D. A., Zella, M. A. S., et al. (2019). Impairment of motor function correlates with neurometabolite and brain iron alterations in Parkinson’s disease. Cells 8:96. doi: 10.3390/cells8020096

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, R. F. (2007). Non-motor parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 13 (Suppl 3), S211–S220. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8020(08)70004-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Postuma, R. B., Berg, D., Stern, M., Poewe, W., Olanow, C. W., Oertel, W., et al. (2015). MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 30, 1591–1601. doi: 10.1002/mds.26424

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rhee, S. Y., Han, K. D., Kwon, H., Park, S. E., Park, Y. G., Kim, Y. H., et al. (2020). Association between glycemic status and the risk of Parkinson disease: A nationwide population-based study. Diabetes Care 43, 2169–2175. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0760

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosenberg, J., Lechea, N., Pentang, G. N., and Shah, N. J. (2019). What magnetic resonance imaging reveals - A systematic review of the relationship between type II diabetes and associated brain distortions of structure and cognitive functioning. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 52:79–112. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schernhammer, E., Hansen, J., Rugbjerg, K., Wermuth, L., and Ritz, B. (2011). Diabetes and the risk of developing Parkinson’s disease in Denmark. Diabetes Care 34, 1102–1108. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1333

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sian-Hülsmann, J., Mandel, S., Youdim, M. B., and Riederer, P. (2011). The relevance of iron in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurochem. 118, 939–957. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07132.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tham, M., Frischer, J. M., Weigand, S. D., Fitz-Gibbon, P. D., Webb, S. M., Guo, Y., et al. (2021). Iron heterogeneity in early active multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann. Neurol. 89, 498–510. doi: 10.1002/ana.25974

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Walsh, K., and Bennett, G. (2001). Parkinson’s disease and anxiety. Postgrad. Med. J. 77, 89–93. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.904.89

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Butros, S. R., Shuai, X., Dai, Y., Chen, C., Liu, M., et al. (2012). Different iron-deposition patterns of multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonism and idiopathetic Parkinson diseases demonstrated by phase-corrected susceptibility-weighted imaging. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 33, 266–273. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2765

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, B., He, N., Wang, Q., Cheng, Z., Jiao, Y., Haacke, E. M., et al. (2019). Quantitative susceptibility mapping based hybrid feature extraction for diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage Clin. 24:102070. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, Q., Park, Y., Huang, X., Hollenbeck, A., Blair, A., Schatzkin, A., et al. (2011). Diabetes and risk of Parkinson’s disease. Diabetes Care 34, 910–915. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1922

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yamashiro, K., Tanaka, R., Shimo, Y., Oyama, G., Ogawa, T., Umemura, A., et al. (2018). Cerebral microbleeds and blood pressure abnormalities in Parkinson’s disease. eNeurologicalSci 10, 5–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2017.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Q., Zhou, L., Liu, C., Liu, D., Zhang, Y., Li, C., et al. (2018). Brain iron deposition in type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without mild cognitive impairment-an in vivo susceptibility mapping study. Brain Imaging Behav. 12, 1479–1487. doi: 10.1007/s11682-017-9815-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yue, X., Li, H., Yan, H., Zhang, P., Chang, L., and Li, T. (2016). Risk of Parkinson disease in diabetes mellitus: An updated meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e3549. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000003549

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Parkinson’s disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, iron, magnetic sensitivity value, heterogeneity

Citation: Li W, Gao B, Du W, Jiang Y, Yang J, Hu R, Liu Y, Liu N, Zhang Y, Song Q and Miao Y (2022) Iron deposition heterogeneity in extrapyramidal system assessed by quantitative susceptibility mapping in Parkinson’s disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front. Aging Neurosci. 14:975390. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.975390

Received: 22 June 2022; Accepted: 01 August 2022;
Published: 13 September 2022.

Edited by:

Xiaobo Mao, Johns Hopkins Medicine, United States

Reviewed by:

Enquan Xu, Duke University, United States
Xiaodi Zhang, Johns Hopkins Medicine, United States

Copyright © 2022 Li, Gao, Du, Jiang, Yang, Hu, Liu, Liu, Zhang, Song and Miao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yanwei Miao, eXdtaWFvNzE2QDE2My5jb20=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.