94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Yong Gao1*†
Lu Ma2†
Changsheng Lin3†
Shizhe Zhu3Lingling Yao1Hong Fan1Jianqiu Gong1Xiaobo Yan1Tong Wang3,4*- 1Department of Rehabilitation, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Shaoxing, China
- 2Library, Zhejiang Industry Polytechnic College, Shaoxing, China
- 3School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- 4Department of Rehabilitation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
by Gao, Y., Ma, L., Lin, C., Zhu, S., Yao, L., Fan, H., Gong, J., Yan, H., and Wang, T. (2021). Front. Aging Neurosci. 13:766525. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.766525
In the published article, there was an error in section Materials and Methods, Statistical analysis, Paragraph.
Instead of “The effect size (ES) was categorized as follows: small (≤0.2), medium (>0.2 and ≤0.5), and large (>0.5),” it should be “The effect size (ES) was categorized as follows: small (<0.3), medium (≥0.3 and<0.6), and large (≥0.6).”
In the published article, there was also an error in section Introduction.
Instead of “Basic neuroscience behind VR-based treatment was the finding of mirror neurons (MNs) in the primary motor cortex (M1), dorsal premotor cortex, supplementary motor area (SMA), and M1 from animal studies,” it should be “Basic neuroscience behind VR-based treatment was the finding of mirror neurons (MNs) in the primary motor cortex (M1), dorsal premotor cortex, and supplementary motor area (SMA) from animal studies.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: cognition, motor, virtual reality, chronic stroke, meta-analysis
Citation: Gao Y, Ma L, Lin C, Zhu S, Yao L, Fan H, Gong J, Yan X and Wang T (2023) Corrigendum: Effects of virtual reality-based intervention on cognition, motor function, mood, and activities of daily living in patients with chronic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front. Aging Neurosci. 14:1128402. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1128402
Received: 20 December 2022; Accepted: 26 December 2022;
Published: 24 January 2023.
Edited and reviewed by: Jorge Oliveira, Lusophone University, Portugal
Copyright © 2023 Gao, Ma, Lin, Zhu, Yao, Fan, Gong, Yan and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Tong Wang, 
d2FuZ3Rvbmc2MDYyMUAxNjMuY29t; Yong Gao, Z2FveW9uZzIwMTdAMTI2LmNvbQ==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship