Abstract
Reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species (RONS) are by-products of aerobic metabolism. RONS trigger a signaling cascade that can be transduced through oxidation-reduction (redox)-based post-translational modifications (redox PTMs) of protein thiols. This redox signaling is essential for normal cellular physiology and coordinately regulates the function of redox-sensitive proteins. It plays a particularly important role in the brain, which is a major producer of RONS. Aberrant redox PTMs of protein thiols can impair protein function and are associated with several diseases. This mini review article aims to evaluate the role of redox PTMs of protein thiols, in particular S-nitrosation, in brain aging, and in neurodegenerative diseases. It also discusses the potential of using redox-based therapeutic approaches for neurodegenerative conditions.
Introduction
Reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species (RONS) are essential signaling molecules produced by the aerobic metabolism (Friedman, 2010a; Finkel, 2011; Sbodio et al., 2019). One essential route to transduce RONS signaling is through oxidation-reduction (redox)-based post-translational modifications (PTMs) of proteins (Stadtman, 1988; Stadtman and Levine, 2003; Finkel, 2011; Santos and Lindner, 2017).
The mammalian brain is metabolically very active and is a major producer of RONS (Colton and Gilbert, 2002; Friedman, 2010a,b). Therefore, RONS-dependent redox signaling is particularly important in the normal physiology of the brain (Colton and Gilbert, 2002; Beckhauser et al., 2016). Under pathological conditions, RONS can reach excessive levels, generating oxidative and nitrosative (O/N) stresses, which can damage DNA, lipid, and proteins and be detrimental to cell function (Jones, 2006; Ray et al., 2012). O/N stresses are active contributing factors to the pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning neurodegenerative conditions including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS; Friedman, 2010a,b; Kim et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2017; Sbodio et al., 2019).
In aerobic organisms, RONS are constantly produced by the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system and by several enzymes [e.g., NADPH oxidases (NOXs) and nitric oxide synthases (NOSs); Ignarro, 1990; Raha and Robinson, 2000; Forman et al., 2002; Bian and Murad, 2003; Murphy, 2009; Lambeth and Neish, 2014; Nayernia et al., 2014; Di Meo et al., 2016; Ma et al., 2017; Moldogazieva et al., 2018; Barua et al., 2019; Sbodio et al., 2019; Gantner et al., 2020]. Some of the major RONS include hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (•OH), superoxide anion (O2•−), peroxyl radical (ROO•), singlet oxygen (1O2), nitic oxide or nitrogen monoxide (•NO), nitrogen dioxide (•NO2), and peroxynitrite (ONOO−; Commoner et al., 1954; McCord, 2000; Forman et al., 2002; Pham-Huy et al., 2008; Di Meo et al., 2016; Sbodio et al., 2019). A tightly regulated machinery of small molecules [e.g., cysteine, ascorbate, glutathione (GSH)] and proteins [e.g., superoxide dismutases (SODs), catalases (CATs), glutathione peroxidases (GPXs), peroxiredoxins (PRDXs)] reduce RONS to control their levels in cells (Forman et al., 2002; Birben et al., 2012; Moldogazieva et al., 2018; Paul et al., 2018; Sbodio et al., 2019). Under normal physiological (eustress) conditions, RONS production and reduction are balanced; however, any imbalance can generate O/N stresses (Jones, 2006; Moldogazieva et al., 2018; Sies, 2019). Crosstalk between ROS and RNS, their specific sources and scavengers regulate the distribution of the various RONS present in cells (RONS composition), their relative abundance and absolute levels (Forman et al., 2002; Daiber, 2010; Dikalov, 2011; Schulz et al., 2014; Daiber et al., 2017). This complex network of RONS triggers a downstream cascade of events, termed redox signaling (Forman et al., 2002, 2014; Jones, 2006; Ray et al., 2012; Moldogazieva et al., 2018).
This mini review article focuses on the signaling triggered by RONS and transduced through redox PTMs of protein thiols and highlights key features of this signaling in normal cell physiology. It also assesses the role played by this redox signaling in brain aging and neurodegenerative conditions. Lastly, it aims to argue for greater considerations of the complexities of this essential signaling when designing new redox-based therapeutic strategies for neurodegenerative diseases.
Redox Post-translational Modifications (PTMs) of Protein Thiols and Their Role as a Redox Switch for Protein Function
Proteins are the main targets of RONS in cells as a result of their high rate constants for oxidation reactions and their abundance (Stadtman and Levine, 2003; Davies, 2005, 2016; Wall et al., 2012; Moldogazieva et al., 2018). Redox PTMs can occur nearly on any amino acid side chains (Stadtman and Levine, 2003; Dickinson and Chang, 2011; Wall et al., 2012; Corcoran and Cotter, 2013; Go and Jones, 2013). Nitration can modify tyrosine residues, and carbonylation can modify lysine, arginine, proline and threonine residues; however, these modifications are generally stable or irreversible and associated with O/N stresses (Dickinson and Chang, 2011; Wall et al., 2012; Corcoran and Cotter, 2013; Houée-Lévin et al., 2015; Weng et al., 2017; Gonos et al., 2018). Redox PTMs of thiol-containing cysteine (Cys) residues are considered to be one of the main drivers of redox signaling in cells because these residues can be easily oxidized and their oxidation is mostly reversible, with rates of oxidation and reduction compatible with signaling initiation and transduction (Miseta and Csutora, 2000; Davies, 2005, 2016; Bindoli et al., 2008; Schöneich, 2011; Wall et al., 2012; Wani et al., 2014; Go et al., 2015). The electronic structure of the thiol group (–SH) of Cys residues enables multiple oxidation states from −2 to +6 leading to a range of reversible and irreversible redox PTMs (Reddie and Carroll, 2008; Wang et al., 2012b; Chung et al., 2013; Cremers and Jakob, 2013; Wani et al., 2014; Figure 1A). Suggesting a potential cross-regulation between different PTMs, Cys residues can be targeted by a number of redox PTMs; for instance, the active Cys sites of protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) can be S-nitrosated or S-glutathionylated (Halloran et al., 2013). Besides, an interconversion between redox PTMs can also occur, with sulfenic acid (–SOH) representing a potential precursor for other reversible redox PTMs, such as S-glutathionylation, or intramolecular disulfide bond formation, possibly through sequential thiol modifications (Gallogly and Mieyal, 2007; Mieyal et al., 2008; Poole and Nelson, 2008; Sabens Liedhegner et al., 2012). The precise mechanisms underlying cross-regulation and interconversion between different redox PTMs of protein thiols remain unclear and future studies investigating multiple redox PTMs in parallel and over appropriate time-course will be required to fully explore these important aspects of redox PTMs regulation.
Figure 1
Mass spectrometry-based redox proteomic studies that have mapped the redox-modified Cys residues across the proteome (redox Cys-proteome) have shown that, for a given condition, only a very specific subset of Cys residues is redox-modified, demonstrating that RONS modify Cys residues in a very selective manner (Doulias et al., 2010; Marino and Gladyshev, 2010, 2012; McDonagh et al., 2014; Gould et al., 2015; Raju et al., 2015; Araki et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2016; Topf et al., 2018; van der Reest et al., 2018; Mnatsakanyan et al., 2019; Xiao et al., 2020). This selectivity is modulated by several factors including the pKa of the –SH moiety of the Cys residue, its accessibility, the other PTMs present in the target protein, and the charges of the neighboring amino acids and local electrostatic effects (Hess et al., 2001; Davies, 2005; Doulias et al., 2010; Marino and Gladyshev, 2010, 2012; Chung et al., 2013; Roos et al., 2013; Gould et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2016; Mnatsakanyan et al., 2019; Xiao et al., 2020). Many potential consensus motifs have been identified and proposed as a chemical rationale that could underlie the redox sensitivity of specific Cys residues in a given protein (Stamler et al., 1997; Doulias et al., 2010; Marino and Gladyshev, 2010, 2012; Chen et al., 2014, 2015; Gould et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2016; Topf et al., 2018; Mnatsakanyan et al., 2019; Xiao et al., 2020). The variety of consensus motifs proposed so far may partly reflect the wide range of experimental and computational approaches employed to identify the protein thiols that are modified by redox PTMs. Indeed, several studies have focused on endogenous redox PTMs while others have studied redox PTMs induced by exogenously applied RONS (e.g., H2O2, S-Nitroso-l-cysteine, S-Nitrosoglutathione, etc.), and an array of proteomic approaches with varying degrees of sensitivity and selectivity has been used across studies. Thus, finding unifying motifs and rules overarching the specificity of redox PTMs on a proteome-wide scale remains an outstanding challenge. It has been proposed that under eustress, for a given RONS composition, RONS absolute levels, and relative abundance, only a subset of redox-sensitive Cys residues within a protein is potentially susceptible to several redox-PTMs. In contrast, O/N stresses can lead to aberrant redox PTMs including redox PTMs on even lowly-reactive Cys residues, and/or addition of excessive, persistent or irreversible redox PTMs (Chung et al., 2013). This continuum of reactivity of Cys residues in redox-sensitive proteins may provide a redox-sensing mechanism for cells to monitor RONS composition and RONS levels in the cellular environment and to coordinate an appropriate downstream response.
Redox PTMs on proteins act as a “redox switch” that dynamically regulates protein function (Go and Jones, 2013; Go et al., 2015; Fra et al., 2017). Redox PTMs can lead to structural changes in the target protein through disulfide bond formation, including intramolecular disulfide bonds, Cys-dependent metal cofactor interactions, and through alteration of the topography of the protein (Davies, 2005; Khoo and Norton, 2011; Wani et al., 2014). The way redox PTMs affect protein conformation is partly dictated by the position of the modified Cys residue in the target protein, e.g., on the protein surface or buried, or on the protein backbone or side-chains (Dean et al., 1997; Davies, 2005). It remains difficult to predict the precise effect of redox PTMs on protein structure and function, and thus computational and experimental approaches need to be combined to fully uncover the functional consequences of redox PTMs on a given protein (Raimondi et al., 2014; Wani et al., 2014). Redox PTMs can also modulate the stability and degradation of target proteins (Pajares et al., 2015, 2018). It has been suggested that depending on the degree of oxidation of a protein (esp. whether its redox PTMs are reversible or irreversible), degradation can occur through either ATP- and polyubiquitination-dependent or independent mechanisms (Pajares et al., 2015; Song et al., 2016). Redox PTMs can induce conformational changes that expose hydrophobic structures normally buried in the natively folded protein; these structures become recognition and binding surfaces for the 20S core subunit of the proteasome, which subsequently degrades the oxidized target protein (Grune et al., 1997; Jung and Grune, 2008; Jung et al., 2014). The redox state of protein thiols can also regulate the localization of target proteins (Wani et al., 2014). Importantly, redox PTMs can ultimately tune the activity of redox-sensitive enzymes and regulate their enzymatic cycle and recycling (Klomsiri et al., 2011). For instance, the function of the redox-sensitive protein, Prdx2, is regulated by a redox switch (Rhee and Kil, 2017). Depending on the cellular RONS composition and levels, the various residues of Prdx2 can be decorated by an array of different redox PTMs (Fang et al., 2007; Park et al., 2011; Engelman et al., 2013; Peskin et al., 2013, 2016; Wong et al., 2013; Randall et al., 2014, 2019; Salzano et al., 2014; Svistunova et al., 2019; Figure 1A). Redox PTMs of Prdx2 regulate its conformation (Wood et al., 2003; Barranco-Medina et al., 2009; Hall et al., 2009, 2011), catalytic cycle (Woo et al., 2005; Hall et al., 2009; Karplus, 2015; Rhee, 2016), degradation (Song et al., 2016) and secretion (Salzano et al., 2014; Mullen et al., 2015; Figures 1B–F). Crucially, redox PTMs can coordinately regulate Prdx2 multiple functions as an antioxidant enzyme and a chaperone. For example, overoxidation (Prdx2-SO2/3) or S-nitrosation (Prdx2-SNO) of Prdx2 can inactivate its antioxidant activity, while Prdx2-SO2/3 stabilizes Prdx2 high-molecular weight chaperone complexes (Wood et al., 2003; Jang et al., 2004; Fang et al., 2007; Hall et al., 2009, 2011; Rhee and Woo, 2011; Saccoccia et al., 2012; Rhee and Kil, 2017; Svistunova et al., 2019).
By acting as a redox switch for protein function, redox PTMs allow for proteins to carry out different functions in different subcellular compartments. Indeed, the nature of the redox PTMs on protein thiols is greatly determined by the RONS composition and pH of the environment surrounding the target protein (Pace and Weerapana, 2013; Roos et al., 2013). Therefore, when a protein shuttles to a different compartment with a different RONS composition and pH, the redox PTMs of the protein as well as its activity will change accordingly (Go and Jones, 2008; Jones and Go, 2010). Together, redox PTMs of protein thiols constitute a powerful mechanism that allows for a very dynamic and compartment-specific regulation of protein functions in cells.
Role of Redox PTMs of Protein Thiols in Cell Physiology and Brain Aging
Advances in redox proteomics have allowed to explore further the functional role of redox PTMs of protein thiols in cell and organ physiology. In particular, a recent study has mapped the oxidized Cys residues landscape in ten different tissues from wild-type mice using a highly sensitive and specific approach (a Cys-reactive phosphate tag method) and has shown that oxidized Cys residues were detected in almost half of all proteins in all tissues tested suggesting that redox PTM of protein thiols is a widely used signaling mechanism in normal cellular physiology (Go et al., 2011; Xiao et al., 2020). Analyses of the redox Cys-proteome across subcellular compartments also demonstrated that redox PTM of protein thiols occurs in all subcellular compartments, from nucleus, cytoplasm, Golgi, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to mitochondria (Go et al., 2011; Chung et al., 2013; Doulias et al., 2013; Xiao et al., 2020).
Redox PTMs have been shown to regulate the activity of proteins implicated in a range of major cellular functions, and cell survival/death (Trachootham et al., 2008; Brigelius-Flohé and Flohé, 2011; Handy and Loscalzo, 2012; Wall et al., 2012; Mailloux et al., 2014; Niforou et al., 2014; Go et al., 2015; Jones and Sies, 2015; Pajares et al., 2015; Nakamura and Lipton, 2017; Figure 2A). In particular, redox PTMs play an essential role in the regulation of energy metabolism in cells through S-nitrosation, S-glutathionylation, or S-sulfenylation of proteins of the mitochondrial respiratory complexes I, II, IV, and V, and ATP synthase (Hurd et al., 2008; Garcia et al., 2010; Handy and Loscalzo, 2012; Wang et al., 2013; Mailloux et al., 2014; Nakamura and Lipton, 2017; van der Reest et al., 2018; Xiao et al., 2020), enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (e.g., Alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase, Isocitrate dehydrogenase, Aconitase; Kil and Park, 2005; McLain et al., 2013; Yan et al., 2013; Bulteau et al., 2017; Nakamura and Lipton, 2017, 2020; Xiao et al., 2020), enzymes of glycolysis [e.g., Hexokinase, Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH); Riederer et al., 2009; Mailloux et al., 2014; McDonagh et al., 2014; Araki et al., 2016; van der Reest et al., 2018; Xiao et al., 2020] and of fatty acid metabolism (e.g., Very long chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase; Doulias et al., 2013). Similarly, for proteostasis, redox PTMs have been reported on chaperones (e.g., Heat shock protein 70, PDI; Wang C. et al., 2012; Grunwald et al., 2014), subunits of the proteasome (Aiken et al., 2011; Jung et al., 2014; Kors et al., 2019), and proteins involved in autophagy (e.g., Autophagy Related 3, 4 and 7; Frudd et al., 2018; Pajares et al., 2018; Scherz-Shouval et al., 2019), which ultimately contribute to the regulation of protein folding and degradation (Niforou et al., 2014; Pajares et al., 2015). Redox PTMs can also regulate the activity of several transcription factors (Brigelius-Flohé and Flohé, 2011). For instance, oxidation, S-nitrosation or nitration of p53, activating protein 1, myocyte enhancer factor 2 or nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB) modulate the DNA binding and activity of these important transcription factors (Abate et al., 1990; Schreck et al., 1991; Rainwater et al., 1995; Klatt et al., 1999; Kabe et al., 2005; Yakovlev et al., 2007; Jung et al., 2008; Ljubuncic et al., 2008; Okamoto et al., 2014; Caviedes et al., 2020). Redox PTMs can also affect the activity of transcription factors through indirect mechanisms. For example, redox PTMs on Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) trigger the dissociation of the cytoplasmic complex formed by Keap1 and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), which allows Nrf2 to translocate to the nucleus and to bind to the antioxidant response element of its target genes (Dinkova-Kostova et al., 2002, 2017; Rachakonda et al., 2008).
Figure 2
More globally, comprehensive functional analyses on the redox Cys-proteomes of various cell types and tissues have demonstrated that redox PTMs can regulate whole networks of proteins that share similar biological activities (Doulias et al., 2010; Go et al., 2011, 2015; Xiao et al., 2020). Importantly, this coordinated redox-based regulation of functional protein networks underpins, at least in part, the unique physiological and metabolic states that characterize the different cell types and tissues present in organisms. Indeed, redox PTMs of protein thiols can tune the activity of ubiquitously expressed proteins in a tissue-specific manner and can also regulate functional networks specifically in different tissues to control both tissue-ubiquitous functions (e.g., tRNA aminoacylation) and tissue-specific functions (e.g., catabolism of glycogen and glucose; Doulias et al., 2013; Xiao et al., 2020). Therefore, redox PTMs of protein thiols play an essential part in normal cell physiology and coordinately regulate functional networks in a tissue- and cell type-specific manner.
Aging is characterized by molecular and cellular hallmarks including, but not limited to, altered mitochondrial function, impaired energy metabolism, increased O/N stresses, and loss of proteostasis (López-Otín et al., 2013; Figure 2B). Many aspects of the fundamental molecular mechanisms of brain aging remain unknown (Mattson and Arumugam, 2018). The “free radical theory of aging” postulates that aging is driven by an accumulation of harmful and irreversible RONS-induced damage to DNA, lipids, and proteins (Harman, 1956, 2006). In accordance with this theory, an increase in modified proteins (e.g., S-nitrosated Cys residues, and nitrated and carbonylated amino acids) has been observed in the brain of aging rodents and humans, especially in the hippocampus, substantia nigra and frontal cortex, brain regions particularly vulnerable to aging-associated diseases (Smith et al., 1991; Cini and Moretti, 1995; Farr et al., 2003; Dremina et al., 2005; Siqueira et al., 2005; Poon et al., 2006b; Gokulrangan et al., 2007; Prokai et al., 2007; Riederer et al., 2009; Grimm et al., 2011; Venkateshappa et al., 2012; Ortuño-Sahagún et al., 2014; Perluigi et al., 2014; Cabré et al., 2017; Gonos et al., 2018). In addition, in line with an age-dependent increase in O/N stresses, accumulation of redox PTMs (e.g., S-sulfonylation and excessive disulfide bonds) on key antioxidant proteins such as PRDXs and SODs has been described and shown to impair the enzymatic activity of these proteins (Kurokawa et al., 2001; Navarro and Boveris, 2004; Poon et al., 2006a,b; Musicco et al., 2009; Pérez et al., 2010; Gottfredsen et al., 2013; McDonagh et al., 2014; Perluigi et al., 2014).
Irreversible redox PTMs can participate in the aging process by triggering unfolding and aggregation of proteins through hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions between target proteins (Höhn et al., 2017). With time, these aggregates can be covalently stabilized, rendering protein aggregates insoluble and non-degradable (Pacifici et al., 1993; Giulivi et al., 1994; Johnston et al., 1998; Calderwood et al., 2009; Koga et al., 2011; Höhn et al., 2017). Existing protein aggregates can undergo further cross-linking reactions with molecules such as aldehydes and malondialdehyde, products of lipid peroxidation, resulting in the formation of highly cross-linked autofluorescent material referred to as lipofuscin, an important hallmark of aging (Stadtman and Levine, 2003; Terman and Brunk, 2004; Jung et al., 2007). O/N stresses also impair the activity of the proteasome through irreversible redox PTMs such as carbonylation of its subunits, leading to an age-dependent reduction of protein degradation and further accumulation of protein aggregates (Friguet, 2006; Jung et al., 2014; Höhn and Grune, 2014; Lefaki et al., 2017). These protein aggregates may in turn interfere with cell homeostasis.
Also, aberrant redox PTMs of proteins on Cys and other residues may be implicated in the impaired energy metabolism observed in aging (Yap et al., 2009; Barzilai et al., 2012; López-Otín et al., 2013; Chistiakov et al., 2014; Jové et al., 2014; Bouzier-Sore and Bolaños, 2015; Goyal et al., 2017; Mattson and Arumugam, 2018; Rizza et al., 2018; Hipkiss, 2019; Ravera et al., 2019). For instance, 3-nitrotyrosine and carbonylation have been detected on energy-related enzymes, proteins of the mitochondrial respiratory complex and ATP-synthase in aged rats, in the senescence-accelerated (SAMP8) mouse model of aging, and in human postmortem tissue from aged control patients (Smith et al., 1991; Navarro and Boveris, 2004; Poon et al., 2004, 2006a,b; Gokulrangan et al., 2007; Lam et al., 2009; Perluigi et al., 2010; Perluigi et al., 2014; Pérez et al., 2010). Aberrant redox PTMs of proteins may also contribute to the age-associated reduced synaptic transmission and impaired induction of long-term potentiation (Foster and Norris, 1997; Foster and Kumar, 2002; Foster, 2006, 2007, 2012; Kumar et al., 2009, 2018; Bodhinathan et al., 2010a,b; Oh et al., 2010; Bradley and Steinert, 2016; Hidalgo and Arias-Cavieres, 2016; Muñoz et al., 2020). For example, the redox-sensitive ryanodine receptor 3 (RyR3) essential for synaptic transmission and plasticity, is nitrated in the cerebellum of aged rats (Gokulrangan et al., 2007; Lanner et al., 2010; Abu-Omar et al., 2018; Arias-Cavieres et al., 2018; Muñoz et al., 2020). Interestingly, hyper-S-nitrosation of RyRs shifts these receptors from a finely regulated state to unregulated Ca2+ leak channels (Bull et al., 2008; Bellinger et al., 2009; Bodhinathan et al., 2010b; Liu et al., 2012; Lacampagne et al., 2017; Muñoz et al., 2020). S-glutathionylation of RyRs also compromises their function (Bull et al., 2003; Hidalgo, 2005; Aracena-Parks et al., 2006). Together, this suggests that redox PTMs of RyRs may contribute to the progressive age-dependent dysregulation of synaptic transmission.
There is a growing body of evidence however that conflicts with the idea that RONS and associated redox PTMs of proteins in aging are solely detrimental to cell function. The “redox theory of aging” indeed presents the redox proteome as a system that allows organisms to best adapt to a changing environment and varied exposures (exposome) throughout their lifespan, and which contributes to building progressive resilience (Go and Jones, 2013; Jones, 2015; Jones and Sies, 2015). It also states that the process of aging could be a gradual breakdown of the redox proteome and redox metabolome, which act together as adaptive interfaces supporting the interaction between the genome and the exposome (Jones, 2015; Go and Jones, 2017). Other studies have also demonstrated that mitochondrial RONS can initiate a positive adaptive homeostasis cascade following a non-linear response (termed mitohormesis); both the dose and timing of RONS exposure determining whether RONS have either a beneficial or detrimental effect on cell function (Kawagishi and Finkel, 2014; Ristow, 2014; Ristow and Schmeisser, 2014; Yun and Finkel, 2014). Mild O/N stresses can indeed trigger a protective response that makes organisms more resistant to future, greater, oxidative insults and therefore increasing levels of RONS (and potentially of redox PTMs of protein thiols) can be beneficial at the cellular or organismal levels and can even promote healthspan and lifespan (Kawagishi and Finkel, 2014; Ristow, 2014; Ristow and Schmeisser, 2014; Yun and Finkel, 2014). It has been hypothesized that aging results in a generalized decline in this adaptive homeostasis, in particular through an age-dependent attenuation of proteolytic activity and capacity (Pomatto and Davies, 2018).
Besides, also contrary to the concept that RONS induce a bulk accumulation of non-specific redox PTMs of protein thiols in aging, a recent study that compared the redox Cys-proteome in tissues of young (16-week-old) and old (80-week-old) mice has shown that the overall levels of reversibly oxidized Cys residues are very similar in young and aged tissues (Xiao et al., 2020), which was consistent with previous observations made in D. melanogaster (Menger et al., 2015). Interestingly, it also found that young and aged tissues have largely distinct redox proteomic signatures with different highly modified Cys residues (Xiao et al., 2020). This demonstrates that a profound and very specific remodeling of the redox signaling landscape occurs during aging, which in turn induces tissue-specific functional shifts. It remains to explore however whether the redox PTMs that have been detected in aged tissue so far contribute to either accelerating or slowing down the the aging process. It is often difficult to ascertain whether redox PTMs of protein thiols have beneficial or detrimental effects on protein and cellular function, as exemplified by Prdxs, which are “gerontogenes” that can prevent the age-related decline in cognitive function and can increase healthspan and lifespan (Neumann et al., 2003; Oláhová et al., 2008; Timmermann et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2011; Nyström et al., 2012). Indeed, because Prdxs are overoxidized with age (which progressively inactivates their antioxidant activity), redox PTM of Prdxs was initially considered as a detrimental factor contributing to aging (Hall et al., 2009; Musicco et al., 2009; Molin et al., 2011; Nyström et al., 2012). However, because overoxidation of Prdxs also favors their chaperone activity, it was later suggested that redox PTM of Prdxs may constitute a positive adaption that helps counteract the detrimental protein aggregation associated with aging (Nyström et al., 2012). Somewhat related, redox-dependent dimerization of Prdx2 drives a Prdx2-dependent increase in overall life expectancy in C. elegans (De Haes et al., 2014), suggesting that redox PTM of Prdx2 plays a role in counteracting the aging process. Therefore, further studies are required to fully grasp the role played by redox PTMs of protein thiols in brain aging and to explore whether redox PTMs may have different effects (i.e., beneficial or detrimental) at different stages of the aging process.
In the past few decades, additional factors have been implicated in aging including low-grade chronic inflammation (“inflammaging”; Franceschi et al., 2007; von Bernhardi et al., 2015). Which one of the various factors contributing to the aging process is the main initiator of brain aging remains unclear. There are nevertheless many lines of evidence that suggest that these various contributing factors exacerbate each other, and that cellular redox dysregulation may be a common denominator (De la Fuente and Miquel, 2009; Ortuño-Sahagún et al., 2014; Yin et al., 2016). As a possible underlying molecular mechanism, it has been suggested that redox PTM of NF-kB, a pivotal transcription factor regulating inflammation, modulates NF-kB activity and subsequently the inflammatory response during aging (Ljubuncic et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2013). Indeed, under sustained O/N stresses (as seen in aging), tyrosine residues of IκBα (one of NF-kB subunits) are nitrated, which leads to a prolonged and excessive NF-kB activation and signaling (Adler et al., 2007; Yakovlev et al., 2007). More integrated studies of the complex process of aging would be required to understand the interconnection and crosstalk between redox PTMs of protein and the various factors contributing to brain aging.
Role of Redox PTMs of Proteins in Neurodegenerative Conditions
In age-related neurodegenerative conditions such as AD, PD, and ALS, an increase in O/N stresses and associated redox PTMs has consistently been described; S-nitrosated, S-sulfonylated, nitrated and carbonylated proteins are amongst the redox PTMs detected in the cerebrospinal fluid, plasma and postmortem brains and spinal cords of patients with AD, PD or ALS (Markesbery, 1997; Jenner, 2003; Mitsumoto et al., 2008; Riederer et al., 2009; Di Domenico et al., 2011; Sultana et al., 2011a,b; Barone et al., 2012; Sultana and Butterfield, 2013; Zahid et al., 2014). Crucially, these O/N stresses-induced PTMs are also observed at the presymptomatic stages of neurodegenerative diseases (Andrus et al., 1998; Aluise et al., 2010, 2011; Butterfield et al., 2010, 2012; Hartl et al., 2012; Granold et al., 2015; Shen et al., 2015). For example, redox proteomics on postmortem brains from patients with preclinical AD (presymptomatic stage) or with AD with mild cognitive impairment (symptomatic stage) has shown that protein carbonylation increases at the transition between the two clinical stages and correlates with clinical features, pathology and biochemistry of AD (Butterfield et al., 2010, 2012; Sultana et al., 2010; Aluise et al., 2011). Together, this suggests that O/N stresses-induced PTMs are not simply a late consequence of the disease progression but that they play an active role in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative conditions.
Redox PTMs contribute to neurodegenerative conditions by facilitating the aggregation of disease-associated proteins. For instance, redox PTMs such as oxidation, sumoylation, and nitration of amyloid β (Aβ) or α-synuclein (associated with AD and PD, respectively) inhibit their degradation by the ubiquitin/proteasome system and autophagy, which leads to further accumulation and aggregation of their toxic products (Kuo et al., 1998; Przedborski et al., 2001; Boutte et al., 2006; Butterfield et al., 2010; Stefanis, 2012; Chavarría and Souza, 2013; Barrett and Timothy Greenamyre, 2015; Roher et al., 2017; Savyon and Engelender, 2020).
Also, aberrant redox PTMs of proteins playing key roles in cell physiology are consistently observed in neurodegenerative conditions (Nakamura et al., 2013; Akhtar et al., 2016; Di Domenico et al., 2017; Tramutola et al., 2017; Valle and Carrì, 2017; Dyer et al., 2019; Sbodio et al., 2019; Tegeder, 2019; Nakamura and Lipton, 2020; Figures 2C–E). For example, the redox-sensitive dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1), a GTPase involved in mitochondrial fission, is activated by S-nitrosation (Drp1-SNO; Cho et al., 2009; Willems et al., 2015; Figure 2C). Drp1 is aberrantly S-nitrosated in neurodegenerative disease as high levels of Drp1-SNO and hyperactive Drp1 are detected in postmortem brains and peripheral blood lymphocytes of AD patients (Cho et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2009; Manczak and Reddy, 2012; Wang S. et al., 2012). Crucially, exposure of primary neuron cultures to Aβ leads to increase in Drp1-SNO, excessive mitochondrial fission, impaired energy metabolism, and neuronal cell loss, mimicking what is seen in AD, while the use of a non-nitrosylable Drp1 mutant prevents these detrimental effects (Cho et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2009; Trushina et al., 2012; DuBoff et al., 2013; Joshi et al., 2017; Pérez et al., 2017; Flannery and Trushina, 2019; Oliver and Reddy, 2019). Therefore, S-nitrosation of Drp1 plays a key role in the mitochondrial dynamic defects and neurodegeneration observed in AD (Wang et al., 2009; Cho et al., 2010, 2013; Nakamura and Lipton, 2020). The multifunctional protein PDI is also aberrantly S-nitrosated in neurodegenerative conditions as shown in postmortem spinal cords of ALS patients and transgenic SOD1G93A mouse model of ALS as well as in postmortem brains of AD and PD patients (Uehara et al., 2006; Walker et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2013; Jeon et al., 2014; Conway and Harris, 2015; Figure 2D). PDI is an ER protein, but in disease conditions, triggered by redox PTMs in particular, it can translocate to the cytoplasm where it localizes to inclusions containing ALS-associated proteins (Turano et al., 2002; Honjo et al., 2011; Walker and Atkin, 2011; Farg et al., 2012; Jeon et al., 2014; Valle and Carrì, 2017; Matsusaki et al., 2020; Parakh et al., 2020). PDI, as an oxidoreductase chaperone, catalyzes the maturation of disulfide bond-containing proteins through oxidation and isomerization functions (Gonzalez et al., 2010). However, S-nitrosation of PDI Cys residues in its two thioredoxin-like domains inactivates both its chaperone and isomerase activities, which leads to the accumulation of misfolded proteins, in particular ALS-associated proteins like SOD1, and to a persistent ER stress that ultimately triggers neuronal injury and death (Uehara et al., 2006; Walker et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2012, 2013; Jeon et al., 2014; Medinas et al., 2018; Matsusaki et al., 2020). Similarly, excessive levels of S-nitrosation of another multifunctional protein, Prdx2, are observed in dopaminergic neurons differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells from PD patients as well as in PQ/MB-exposed PD mouse model and postmortem brains of patients with PD (Fang et al., 2007; Sunico et al., 2016). Importantly, S-nitrosation of Prdx2 breaks the normal redox cycle that regenerates Prdx2, inhibits its peroxidase activity, and reduces its overoxidation (which is essential for stabilization of Prdx2 chaperone complexes; Jang et al., 2004; Fang et al., 2007; Engelman et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2019). Together, this suggests that aberrant redox PTM of Prdx2 Cys residues impairs its antioxidant and chaperone functions, leading to accumulation of misfolded proteins and O/N stresses in neurodegenerative conditions. Neuroinflammation is another essential contributing factor to neurodegeneration (Hsieh and Yang, 2013; Guzman-Martinez et al., 2019). Crucially, redox PTMs of protein thiols have been implicated in inflammation regulation (Gloire and Piette, 2009; Nakamura et al., 2013; Ryan et al., 2014; Gorelenkova Miller and Mieyal, 2015). For instance, S-glutathionylation of various proteins of the NF-kB pathway can modulate the inflammatory response in different cell types, and it has been suggested that S-glutathionylation of protein thiols plays a key role in neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative conditions (Reynaert et al., 2006; Sabens Liedhegner et al., 2012; Gorelenkova Miller and Mieyal, 2015; Cha et al., 2017). Thus, redox PTMs of protein thiols can detrimentally impair the function of target proteins, which in turn can dysregulate many important pathways such as mitochondrial function, proteostasis, ER stress, neuroinflammation, and contribute to the neurodegenerative process (Sabens Liedhegner et al., 2012; Nakamura et al., 2013; Gorelenkova Miller and Mieyal, 2015; Nakato et al., 2015; Valle and Carrì, 2017; Nakamura and Lipton, 2020).
Aberrant redox PTMs have been described in several proteins that can be mutated in the familial forms of neurodegenerative conditions. Importantly, redox PTMs of non-mutated disease-associated proteins can phenocopy the effect of rare genetic mutations (Nakamura et al., 2013). For example, mutations in Parkin in patients with early-onset autosomal recessive juvenile PD impairs its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, which leads to an abnormal accumulation of protein aggregates and cell death (Pankratz and Foroud, 2007; Nakamura et al., 2013; Arkinson and Walden, 2018; Figure 2E). Similar detrimental effects on Parkin function are observed in non-mutated Parkin modified by S-nitrosation (Chung et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2004; Sunico et al., 2013). Levels of S-nitrosated Parkin are increased in postmortem tissues of patients with sporadic PD, which implicates S-nitrosation of Parkin in the pathophysiology of these forms of PD (Chung et al., 2004; Meng et al., 2011; Sunico et al., 2013). Therefore, O/N stresses-induced PTM of protein thiols has been proposed to play an important role in the pathophysiology of the most common forms of neurodegenerative conditions (Sabens Liedhegner et al., 2012; Nakamura et al., 2013; Valle and Carrì, 2017; Dyer et al., 2019).
The Therapeutic Potential of Redox PTMs of Proteins
Given the contribution of O/N stresses in neurodegenerative conditions, therapeutic strategies aiming at reducing O/N stresses using common free radical scavengers such as coenzyme Q10 or Vitamin E have been tested in clinical trials for these conditions, but without much success (Feng and Wang, 2012; Filograna et al., 2016). Mainly due to a lack of appropriate biomarkers, there is still little evidence however that these interventions effectively reduce O/N stresses levels in the patients’ central nervous system. Also, the antioxidants tested target specific RONS but it is not known whether the targeted RONS are implicated in neurodegenerative disease. Indeed, not all RONS are equivalent (Murphy et al., 2011) and only a subset of specific RONS is likely implicated in a given disease state. Physiological levels of RONS are essential for normal cell function and RONS can be beneficial for healthspan and lifespan (Kawagishi and Finkel, 2014; Ristow and Schmeisser, 2014; Ristow, 2014; Yun and Finkel, 2014), therefore globally reducing RONS levels may not only fail to provide therapeutic benefits but may also trigger detrimental side-effects (Kawagishi and Finkel, 2014; Nakamura and Lipton, 2016). These represent few of the factors that may have contributed to the limited success of antioxidant-based therapeutic approaches for the treatment of neurodegenerative conditions.
As an alternative redox-based therapeutic approach, it has been proposed that modulation of redox PTMs of proteins playing part in the neurodegenerative process using small molecules could help prevent disease-associated dysfunction of these proteins and restore their normal activity (Lipton et al., 2002; Wani et al., 2014; Nakamura and Lipton, 2016). This approach has been shown to provide significant therapeutic benefits in several rodent models of neurological conditions. For example, deprenyl/selegiline and its derivatives (CGP3466B, TCH346), used in early PD (Moore and Saadabadi, 2020), has been shown to bind GAPDH (Kragten et al., 1998) and prevent S-nitrosation of its catalytic site (Hara et al., 2006b). S-nitrosation is essential for GAPDH function as it increases its binding to E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase Siah1, which leads to GAPDH translocation to the nucleus and its activity as a transcriptional activator of the apoptotic cascade (Sawa et al., 1997; Kragten et al., 1998; Hara et al., 2005, 2006a,b; Sen et al., 2008). CGP3466B, by preventing GAPDH S-nitrosation, blocks the apoptotic cascade induced by S-nitrosated GAPDH. Accordingly, CGP3466B has been shown to reduce neuronal cell death in animal models of PD (Andringa and Cools, 2000; Andringa et al., 2000; Waldmeier et al., 2000; Hara et al., 2006b; Naoi et al., 2020), ALS (Sagot et al., 2000; Waldmeier et al., 2000), AD (Sen et al., 2018), muscular dystrophy (Erb et al., 2009; Yu et al., 2013), cocaine addiction (Xu et al., 2013; Harraz and Snyder, 2015), traumatic brain injury (Liang et al., 2017), and ischemia (Simon et al., 2001; Ahmari et al., 2020). Together, these studies highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting redox PTMs of specific proteins to modulate protein function and to counteract the neurodegenerative process.
Based on the fact that O/N stresses-induced PTM of proteins can affect the conformation of target proteins and their binding affinity to other proteins and potential drugs, pathologically-activated therapeutics have been developed to interact with “cryptic” sites of the target proteins that are exposed only under pathological conditions (Lipton, 2007). This approach aims to reduce the pathological activity of the target protein and to spare its normal activity in order to prevent any side-effects associated with drug treatment (Lipton, 2007). Such approach has been used to dampen the pathological hyperactivity of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR; Figure 2F). NMDAR is a glutamate-gated ion channel permeable to Ca2+ and is essential for neurotransmission, learning, and memory formation (Lipton, 2006). Hyperactivity of NMDAR is a common disease mechanism for many neurodegenerative conditions (Lipton and Rosenberg, 1994), and plays a critical role in excitotoxicity and synaptic damage in AD (Li et al., 2011; Talantova et al., 2013; Molokanova et al., 2014). To reduce NMDAR hyperactivity, the FDA-approved aminoadamantane compound, Memantine, an uncompetitive fast-off rate NMDAR antagonist that acts as an open-channel blocker was used initially (Chen et al., 1992; Chen and Lipton, 1997; Lipton, 2006). To improve the limited effect of Memantine on disease symptoms, and based on the observation that S-nitrosation of NMDAR reduces its activity (Lipton and Rosenberg, 1994; Choi et al., 2000; Lipton, 2006; Takahashi et al., 2007; Molokanova et al., 2014), NitroSynapsin (YQW-036, NitroMemantine), a derivative of Memantine that combines the aminoadamantane moiety and a nitro group was later synthesized and tested (Lipton, 2006, 2007; Wang et al., 2006; Talantova et al., 2013). NitroSynapsin utilizes the high-affinity Memantine binding site on NMDARs to target the nitro group for interaction with the S-nitrosation/inhibitory site of NMDAR (which is external to the Memantine-binding site); this increases NMDAR S-nitrosation and further reduces its excessive activity (Takahashi et al., 2015; Ghatak et al., 2020). Importantly, this new drug has been shown to reduce synaptic degeneration and improve the disease phenotype of a 3xTg AD mouse model (Talantova et al., 2013), a rat model of vascular dementia (Takahashi et al., 2015), a MEF2C haploinsufficiency mouse model of autism (Tu et al., 2017), a tuberous sclerosis mouse model (Okamoto et al., 2019) and an hAPP-J20 AD mouse model (Ghatak et al., 2020). Very recently, the effect of NitroSynapsin on neuronal activity has also been explored in neurons and cerebral organoids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (Ghatak et al., 2020). Interestingly, NitroSynapsin (but not Memantine) dampens the AD-associated increase in spontaneous action potentials and hypersynchronous network activity, suggesting that NitroSynapsin is more effective than Memantine as a human AD drug (Ghatak et al., 2020), which will be tested in future clinical trials.
The potential synergistic effect on drug efficacy of the combination of an existing drug and a nitro group has also been tested with the FDA-approved compound Clomethiazole (CMZ). CMZ is a well-established neuroprotective potentiator of the redox-sensitive gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor (GABAR; Castel and Vaudry, 2001; Wilby and Hutchinson, 2004; Gasulla et al., 2012; Dejanovic and Schwarz, 2014; Vandevrede et al., 2014; Calvo and Beltrán González, 2016). Crucially, NMZ/GT-1061, a CMZ compound analog possessing a nitro group, was shown in AD mouse models to significantly reduce Aβ deposition and cognitive decline, and to restore neuronal plasticity (Qin et al., 2012; Luo et al., 2015, 2016; Hollas et al., 2019); however, it remains unknown whether NO-mediated redox PTMs on GABAR play a part in the improved beneficial therapeutic effects provided by NMZ treatment.
Given the importance of O/N stresses and associated modifications in the onset and progression of many diseases, redox PTMs, especially irreversible redox PTMs, have been proposed as potential circulating biomarkers for a range of conditions including cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases (Di Domenico et al., 2011; Butterfield et al., 2014; Frijhoff et al., 2015; Mnatsakanyan et al., 2018; Tomin et al., 2019). Several studies have explored the proteins modified by irreversible redox PTMs (e.g., carbonylation) in cerebrospinal fluid and blood of AD and control patients and have detected differences in oxidation levels of a small number of proteins (Choi et al., 2002; Korolainen et al., 2007; Korolainen and Pirttilä, 2009; Cocciolo et al., 2012) suggesting that specific redox-modified proteins could be used as biomarkers for neurodegenerative conditions. Major technical challenges have however hindered so far the discovery of the full spectrum of proteins modified by redox PTMs in clinical samples (Delobel et al., 2016; Mnatsakanyan et al., 2018). Another major hurdle in the use of redox-modified proteins as biomarkers for neurodegenerative conditions is the limited passage of proteins or protein fragments through the blood-brain barrier (Di Domenico et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2012a; Hampel et al., 2018). So far, a handful of proteins present in biofluids of patients has been identified as potential biomarkers for neurodegenerative conditions, including Tau, Aβ, and neurofilament light (Hampel et al., 2018; Lewczuk et al., 2018; Robey and Panegyres, 2019; Ashton et al., 2020). Given that redox PTMs of these proteins contribute to the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases (Horiguchi et al., 2003; Reynolds et al., 2006; Alkam et al., 2008; Kummer et al., 2011; Reyes et al., 2011), assessing the redox status of these proteins could provide crucial information, for example on the disease stage, which could potentially help follow disease progression or assess the efficacy of new drugs. It is therefore essential to further improve the sensitivity and robustness of current methodologies used to detect redox PTMs in clinical samples in order to discover redox-modified proteins that could discriminate pathological vs. healthy states and that could potentially be used as diagnostic or prognostic tools for neurodegenerative conditions.
Conclusion
Redox PTMs of protein thiols play an important role in normal cell physiology, brain aging, and in the pathophysiology of several neurodegenerative conditions, including AD, PD, and ALS. Aberrant redox PTMs can occur in response to O/N stresses and contribute to neurodegeneration by disrupting numerous pathways, from proteostasis to mitochondrial dynamics and function. Further developments in mass spectrometry-based redox proteomics will allow to explore the full redox proteome and to identify proteins and pathways modulated by specific redox PTMs in physiology and disease. A better understanding of drug targets’ redox regulations in disease conditions would also be required to design more effective and selective redox-based therapeutic approaches for neurodegenerative conditions. Approaches that would modulate redox PTMs on specific target proteins to elicit a selective cellular response could also be tested as an alternative redox-based therapeutic strategy for neurodegenerative disease.
Statements
Author contributions
MF wrote and edited the entire manuscript.
Funding
This work was funded by an Anne McLaren Fellowship from the University of Nottingham awarded to MF.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbateC.PatelL.RauscherF. J.III.CurranT. (1990). Redox regulation of fos and jun DNA-binding activity in vitro. Science249, 1157–1161. 10.1126/science.2118682
2
Abu-OmarN.DasJ.SzetoV.FengZ. P. (2018). Neuronal ryanodine receptors in development and aging. Mol. Neurobiol.55, 1183–1192. 10.1007/s12035-016-0375-4
3
AdlerA. S.SinhaS.KawaharaT. L.ZhangJ. Y.SegalE.ChangH. Y. (2007). Motif module map reveals enforcement of aging by continual NF-κB activity. Genes Dev.21, 3244–3257. 10.1101/gad.1588507
4
AhmariM.SharafiA.MahmoudiJ.Jafari-AnarkoliI.GharbaviM.HosseiniM. J. (2020). Selegiline (L-Deprenyl) mitigated oxidative stress, cognitive abnormalities and histopathological change in rats: alternative therapy in transient global ischemia. J. Mol. Neurosci. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1007/s12031-020-01544-5
5
AikenC. T.KaakeR. M.WangX.HuangL. (2011). Oxidative stress-mediated regulation of proteasome complexes. Mol. Cell. Proteomics10:R110.006924. 10.1074/mcp.M110.006924
6
AkhtarM. W.Sanz-BlascoS.DolatabadiN.ParkerJ.ChonK.LeeM. S.et al. (2016). Elevated glucose and oligomeric β-amyloid disrupt synapses via a common pathway of aberrant protein S-nitrosylation. Nat. Commun.7:10242. 10.1038/ncomms10242
7
AlkamT.NittaA.MizoguchiH.ItohA.MuraiR.NagaiT.et al. (2008). The extensive nitration of neurofilament light chain in the hippocampus is associated with the cognitive impairment induced by amyloid β in mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.327, 137–147. 10.1124/jpet.108.141309
8
AluiseC. D.RobinsonR. A.BeckettT. L.MurphyM. P.CaiJ.PierceW. M.et al. (2010). Preclinical Alzheimer disease: brain oxidative stress, Aβ peptide and proteomics. Neurobiol. Dis.39, 221–228. 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.04.011
9
AluiseC. D.RobinsonR. A. S.CaiJ.PierceW. M.MarkesberyW. R.ButterfieldD. A. (2011). Redox proteomics analysis of brains from subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment compared to brains from subjects with preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: insights into memory loss in mci. J. Alzheimers Dis.23, 257–269. 10.3233/jad-2010-101083
10
AndringaG.CoolsA. R. (2000). The neuroprotective effects of CGP 3466B in the best in vivo model of Parkinson’s disease, the bilaterally MPTP-treated rhesus monkey. J. Neural Transm.60, 215–225. 10.1007/978-3-7091-6301-6_14
11
AndringaG.van OostenR. V.UngerW.HafmansT. G.VeeningJ.StoofJ. C.et al. (2000). Systemic administration of the propargylamine CGP 3466B prevents behavioural and morphological deficits in rats with 6-hydroxydopamine-induced lesions in the substantia nigra. Eur. J. Neurosci.12, 3033–3043. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00181.x
12
AndrusP. K.FleckT. J.GurneyM. E.HallE. D. (1998). Protein oxidative damage in a transgenic mouse model of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurochem.71, 2041–2048. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71052041.x
13
Aracena-ParksP.GoonasekeraS. A.GilmanC. P.DirksenR. T.HidalgoC.HamiltonS. L. (2006). Identification of cysteines involved in S-nitrosylation, S-glutathionylation and oxidation to disulfides in ryanodine receptor type 1. J. Biol. Chem.281, 40354–40368. 10.1074/jbc.m600876200
14
ArakiK.KusanoH.SasakiN.TanakaR.HattaT.FukuiK.et al. (2016). Redox sensitivities of global cellular cysteine residues under reductive and oxidative stress. J. Proteome Res.15, 2548–2559. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00087
15
Arias-CavieresA.BarrientosG. C.SánchezG.ElguetaC.MuñozP.HidalgoC. (2018). Ryanodine receptor-mediated calcium release has a key role in hippocampal ltd induction. Front. Cell. Neurosci.12:403. 10.3389/fncel.2018.00403
16
ArkinsonC.WaldenH. (2018). Parkin function in Parkinson’s disease. Science360, 267–268. 10.1126/science.aar6606
17
AshtonN. J.HyeA.RajkumarA. P.LeuzyA.SnowdenS.Suárez-CalvetM.et al. (2020). An update on blood-based biomarkers for non-Alzheimer neurodegenerative disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol.16, 265–284. 10.1038/s41582-020-0348-0
18
BaroneE.Di DomenicoF.SultanaR.CocciaR.MancusoC.PerluigiM.et al. (2012). Heme oxygenase-1 posttranslational modifications in the brain of subjects with Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Free Radic. Biol. Med.52, 2292–2301. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.03.020
19
Barranco-MedinaS.LázaroJ. J.DietzK. J. (2009). The oligomeric conformation of peroxiredoxins links redox state to function. FEBS Lett.583, 1809–1816. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.05.029
20
BarrettP. J.Timothy GreenamyreJ. (2015). Post-translational modification of α-synuclein in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Res.1628, 247–253. 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.06.002
21
BaruaS.KimJ. Y.YenariM. A.LeeJ. E. (2019). The role of NOX inhibitors in neurodegenerative diseases. IBRO Rep.7, 59–69. 10.1016/j.ibror.2019.07.1721
22
BarzilaiN.HuffmanD. M.MuzumdarR. H.BartkeA. (2012). The critical role of metabolic pathways in aging. Diabetes61, 1315–1322. 10.2337/db11-1300
23
BeckhauserT. F.Francis-OliveiraJ.De PasqualeR. (2016). Reactive oxygen species: physiological and physiopathological effects on synaptic plasticity. J. Exp. Neurosci.10, 23–48. 10.4137/jen.s39887
24
BellingerA. M.ReikenS.CarlsonC.MongilloM.LiuX.RothmanL.et al. (2009). Hypernitrosylated ryanodine receptor calcium release channels are leaky in dystrophic muscle. Nat. Med.15, 325–330. 10.1038/nm.1916
25
BianK.MuradF. (2003). Nitric oxide (NO)—biogeneration, regulation, and relevance to human diseases. Front. Biosci.8, d264–278. 10.2741/997
26
BindoliA.FukutoJ. M.FormanH. J. (2008). Thiol chemistry in peroxidase catalysis and redox signaling. Antioxid. Redox Signal.10, 1549–1564. 10.1089/ars.2008.2063
27
BirbenE.SahinerU. M.SackesenC.ErzurumS.KalayciO. (2012). Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. World Allergy Organ. J.5, 9–19. 10.1097/WOX.0b013e3182439613
28
BodhinathanK.KumarA.FosterT. C. (2010a). Intracellular redox state alters NMDA receptor response during aging through Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. J. Neurosci.30, 1914–1924. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5485-09.2010
29
BodhinathanK.KumarA.FosterT. C. (2010b). Redox sensitive calcium stores underlie enhanced after hyperpolarization of aged neurons: role for ryanodine receptor mediated calcium signaling. J. Neurophysiol.104, 2586–2593. 10.1152/jn.00577.2010
30
BoutteA. M.WoltjerR. L.ZimmermanL. J.StamerS. L.MontineK. S.MannoM. V.et al. (2006). Selectively increased oxidative modifications mapped to detergent-insoluble forms of Aβ and β-III tubulin in Alzheimer’s disease. FASEB J.20, 1473–1483. 10.1096/fj.06-5920com
31
Bouzier-SoreA.-K.BolañosJ. P. (2015). Uncertainties in pentose-phosphate pathway flux assessment underestimate its contribution to neuronal glucose consumption: relevance for neurodegeneration and aging. Front. Aging Neurosci.7:89. 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00089
32
BradleyS. A.SteinertJ. R. (2016). Nitric oxide-mediated posttranslational modifications: impacts at the synapse. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.2016:5681036. 10.1155/2016/5681036
33
Brigelius-FlohéR.FlohéL. (2011). Basic principles and emerging concepts in the redox control of transcription factors. Antioxid. Redox Signal.15, 2335–2381. 10.1089/ars.2010.3534
34
BullR.FinkelsteinJ. P.GálvezJ.SánchezG.DonosoP.BehrensM. I.et al. (2008). Ischemia enhances activation by Ca2+ and redox modification of ryanodine receptor channels from rat brain cortex. J. Neurosci.28, 9463–9472. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2286-08.2008
35
BullR.MarengoJ. J.FinkelsteinJ. P.BehrensM. I.AlvarezO. (2003). SH oxidation coordinates subunits of rat brain ryanodine receptor channels activated by calcium and ATP. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.285, C119–128. 10.1152/ajpcell.00296.2002
36
BulteauA. L.MenaN. P.AuchèreF.LeeI.PrigentA.LobsigerC. S.et al. (2017). Dysfunction of mitochondrial Lon protease and identification of oxidized protein in mouse brain following exposure to MPTP: implications for Parkinson disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med.108, 236–246. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.03.036
37
ButterfieldD. A.GalvanV.LangeM. B.TangH.SowellR. A.SpilmanP.et al. (2010). In vivo oxidative stress in brain of Alzheimer disease transgenic mice: requirement for methionine 35 in amyloid β-peptide of APP. Free Radic. Biol. Med.48, 136–144. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.10.035
38
ButterfieldD. A.GuL.DomenicoF. D.RobinsonR. A. S. (2014). Mass spectrometry and redox proteomics: applications in disease. Mass Spectrom. Rev.33, 277–301. 10.1002/mas.21374
39
ButterfieldD. A.PerluigiM.ReedT.MuharibT.HughesC. P.RobinsonR. A. S.et al. (2012). Redox proteomics in selected neurodegenerative disorders: from its infancy to future applications. Antioxid. Redox Signal.17, 1610–1655. 10.1089/ars.2011.4109
40
CabréR.NaudíA.Dominguez-GonzalezM.AyalaV.JovéM.Mota-MartorellN.et al. (2017). Sixty years old is the breakpoint of human frontal cortex aging. Free Radic. Biol. Med.103, 14–22. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.12.010
41
CalderwoodS. K.MurshidA.PrinceT. (2009). The shock of aging: molecular chaperones and the heat shock response in longevity and aging—a mini-review. Gerontology55, 550–558. 10.1159/000225957
42
CalvoD. J.Beltrán GonzálezA. N. (2016). Dynamic regulation of the GABAA receptor function by redox mechanisms. Mol. Pharmacol.90, 326–333. 10.1124/mol.116.105205
43
CastelH.VaudryH. (2001). Nitric oxide directly activates GABAA receptor function through a cGMP/protein kinase-independent pathway in frog pituitary melanotrophs. J. Neuroendocrinol.13, 695–705. 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2001.00683.x
44
CaviedesA.MaturanaB.CorvalánK.EnglerA.GordilloF.Varas-GodoyM.et al. (2020). The eNOS-dependent S-nitrosylation of the NF-κB subunit p65 has neuroprotective consequences in excitotoxicity. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/2020.02.04.932772
45
ChaS. J.KimH.ChoiH.-J.LeeS.KimK. (2017). Protein glutathionylation in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.2017:2818565. 10.1155/2017/2818565
46
ChavarríaC.SouzaJ. M. (2013). Oxidation and nitration of α-synuclein and their implications in neurodegenerative diseases. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.533, 25–32. 10.1016/j.abb.2013.02.009
47
ChenX.GuanT.LiC.ShangH.CuiL.LiX. M.et al. (2012). SOD1 aggregation in astrocytes following ischemia/reperfusion injury: a role of NO-mediated S-nitrosylation of protein disulfide isomerase (PDI). J. Neuroinflammation9:237. 10.1186/1742-2094-9-237
48
ChenH. S.LiptonS. A. (1997). Mechanism of memantine block of NMDA-activated channels in rat retinal ganglion cells: uncompetitive antagonism. J. Physiol.499, 27–46. 10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp021909
49
ChenY.-J.LuC.-T.HuangK.-Y.WuH.-Y.ChenY.-J.LeeT.-Y. (2015). GSHSite: exploiting an iteratively statistical method to identify S-glutathionylation sites with substrate specificity. PLoS One10:e0118752. 10.1371/journal.pone.0118752
50
ChenY.-J.LuC.-T.LeeT.-Y.ChenY.-J. (2014). dbGSH: a database of S-glutathionylation. Bioinformatics30, 2386–2388. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu301
51
ChenH. S.PellegriniJ. W.AggarwalS. K.LeiS. Z.WarachS.JensenF. E.et al. (1992). Open-channel block of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) responses by memantine: therapeutic advantage against NMDA receptor-mediated neurotoxicity. J. Neurosci.12, 4427–4436. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-11-04427.1992
52
ChenX.ZhangX.LiC.GuanT.ShangH.CuiL.et al. (2013). S-nitrosylated protein disulfide isomerase contributes to mutant SOD1 aggregates in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurochem.124, 45–58. 10.1111/jnc.12046
53
ChistiakovD. A.SobeninI. A.RevinV. V.OrekhovA. N.BobryshevY. V. (2014). Mitochondrial aging and age-related dysfunction of mitochondria. Biomed Res. Int.2014:238463. 10.1155/2014/238463
54
ChoB.ChoiS. Y.ChoH. M.KimH. J.SunW. (2013). Physiological and pathological significance of dynamin-related protein 1 (drp1)-dependent mitochondrial fission in the nervous system. Exp. Neurobiol.22, 149–157. 10.5607/en.2013.22.3.149
55
ChoD. H.NakamuraT.LiptonS. A. (2010). Mitochondrial dynamics in cell death and neurodegeneration. Cell Mol. Life Sci.67, 3435–3447. 10.1007/s00018-010-0435-2
56
ChoD.-H.NakamuraT.FangJ.CieplakP.GodzikA.GuZ.et al. (2009). S-nitrosylation of Drp1 mediates β-amyloid-related mitochondrial fission and neuronal injury. Science324, 102–105. 10.1126/science.1171091
57
ChoiJ.MalakowskyC. A.TalentJ. M.ConradC. C.GracyR. W. (2002). Identification of oxidized plasma proteins in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.293, 1566–1570. 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00420-5
58
ChoiY. B.TennetiL.LeD. A.OrtizJ.BaiG.ChenH. S.et al. (2000). Molecular basis of NMDA receptor-coupled ion channel modulation by S-nitrosylation. Nat. Neurosci.3, 15–21. 10.1038/71090
59
ChungK. K. K.ThomasB.LiX.PletnikovaO.TroncosoJ. C.MarshL.et al. (2004). S-nitrosylation of parkin regulates ubiquitination and compromises Parkin’s protective function. Science304, 1328–1331. 10.1126/science.1093891
60
ChungH. S.WangS.-B.VenkatramanV.MurrayC. I.EykJ. E. V. (2013). Cysteine oxidative posttranslational modifications. Circ. Res.112, 382–392. 10.1161/circresaha.112.268680
61
CiniM.MorettiA. (1995). Studies on lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation in the aging brain. Neurobiol. Aging16, 53–57. 10.1016/0197-4580(95)80007-e
62
CoccioloA.Di DomenicoF.CocciaR.FioriniA.CaiJ.PierceW. M.et al. (2012). Decreased expression and increased oxidation of plasma haptoglobin in Alzheimer disease: insights from redox proteomics. Free Radic. Biol. Med.53, 1868–1876. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.08.596
63
ColtonC. A.GilbertD. L. (2002). “Reactive oxygen species and neuronal function,” in Reactive Oxygen Species in Biological Systems: An Interdisciplinary Approach (Boston, MA: Springer), 569–589.
64
CommonerB.TownsendJ.PakeG. E. (1954). Free radicals in biological materials. Nature174, 689–691. 10.1038/174689a0
65
ConwayM. E.HarrisM. (2015). S-nitrosylation of the thioredoxin-like domains of protein disulfide isomerase and its role in neurodegenerative conditions. Front. Chem.3:27. 10.3389/fchem.2015.00027
66
CorcoranA.CotterT. G. (2013). Redox regulation of protein kinases. FEBS J.280, 1944–1965. 10.1111/febs.12224
67
CremersC. M.JakobU. (2013). Oxidant sensing by reversible disulfide bond formation. J. Biol. Chem.288, 26489–26496. 10.1074/jbc.r113.462929
68
DaiberA. (2010). Redox signaling (cross-talk) from and to mitochondria involves mitochondrial pores and reactive oxygen species. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1797, 897–906. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.01.032
69
DaiberA.Di LisaF.OelzeM.Kröller-SchönS.StevenS.SchulzE.et al. (2017). Crosstalk of mitochondria with NADPH oxidase via reactive oxygen and nitrogen species signalling and its role for vascular function. Br. J. Pharmacol.174, 1670–1689. 10.1111/bph.13403
70
DaviesM. J. (2005). The oxidative environment and protein damage. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1703, 93–109. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2004.08.007
71
DaviesM. J. (2016). Protein oxidation and peroxidation. Biochem. J.473, 805–825. 10.1042/bj20151227
72
De HaesW.FrooninckxL.Van AsscheR.SmoldersA.DepuydtG.BillenJ.et al. (2014). Metformin promotes lifespan through mitohormesis via the peroxiredoxin PRDX-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A111, E2501–E2509. 10.1073/pnas.1321776111
73
De la FuenteM.MiquelJ. (2009). An update of the oxidation-inflammation theory of aging: the involvement of the immune system in oxi-inflamm-aging. Curr. Pharm. Des.15, 3003–3026. 10.2174/138161209789058110
74
DeanR. T.FuS.StockerR.DaviesM. J. (1997). Biochemistry and pathology of radical-mediated protein oxidation. Biochem. J.324, 1–18. 10.1042/bj3240001
75
DejanovicB.SchwarzG. (2014). Neuronal nitric oxide synthase-dependent S-nitrosylation of gephyrin regulates gephyrin clustering at GABAergic synapses. J. Neurosci.34, 7763–7768. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0531-14.2014
76
DelobelJ.PrudentM.CrettazD.ElHajjZ.RiedererB. M.TissotJ. D.et al. (2016). Cysteine redox proteomics of the hemoglobin-depleted cytosolic fraction of stored red blood cells. Proteomics Clin. Appl.10, 883–893. 10.1002/prca.201500132
77
Di DomenicoF.BaroneE.PerluigiM.ButterfieldD. A. (2017). The triangle of death in Alzheimer’s disease brain: the aberrant cross-talk among energy metabolism, mammalian target of rapamycin signaling and protein homeostasis revealed by redox proteomics. Antioxid. Redox Signal.26, 364–387. 10.1089/ars.2016.6759
78
Di DomenicoF.CocciaR.ButterfieldD. A.PerluigiM. (2011). Circulating biomarkers of protein oxidation for Alzheimer disease: expectations within limits. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1814, 1785–1795. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.10.001
79
Di MeoS.ReedT. T.VendittiP.VictorV. M. (2016). Role of ROS and RNS sources in physiological and pathological conditions. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.2016:1245049. 10.1155/2016/1245049
80
DickinsonB. C.ChangC. J. (2011). Chemistry and biology of reactive oxygen species in signaling or stress responses. Nat. Chem. Biol.7, 504–511. 10.1038/nchembio.607
81
DikalovS. (2011). Cross talk between mitochondria and NADPH oxidases. Free Radic. Biol. Med.51, 1289–1301. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.06.033
82
Dinkova-KostovaA. T.HoltzclawW. D.ColeR. N.ItohK.WakabayashiN.KatohY.et al. (2002). Direct evidence that sulfhydryl groups of Keap1 are the sensors regulating induction of phase 2 enzymes that protect against carcinogens and oxidants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A99, 11908–11913. 10.1073/pnas.172398899
83
Dinkova-KostovaA. T.KostovR. V.CanningP. (2017). Keap1, the cysteine-based mammalian intracellular sensor for electrophiles and oxidants. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.617, 84–93. 10.1016/j.abb.2016.08.005
84
DouliasP.-T.GreeneJ. L.GrecoT. M.TenopoulouM.SeeholzerS. H.DunbrackR. L.et al. (2010). Structural profiling of endogenous S-nitrosocysteine residues reveals unique features that accommodate diverse mechanisms for protein S-nitrosylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A107, 16958–16963. 10.1073/pnas.1008036107
85
DouliasP.-T.TenopoulouM.GreeneJ. L.RajuK.IschiropoulosH. (2013). Nitric oxide regulates mitochondrial fatty acid metabolism through reversible protein S-nitrosylation. Sci. Signal.6:rs1. 10.1126/scisignal.2003252
86
DreminaE. S.SharovV. S.SchöneichC. (2005). Protein tyrosine nitration in rat brain is associated with raft proteins, flotillin-1 and α-tubulin: effect of biological aging. J. Neurochem.93, 1262–1271. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03115.x
87
DuBoffB.FeanyM.GötzJ. (2013). Why size matters—balancing mitochondrial dynamics in Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Neurosci.36, 325–335. 10.1016/j.tins.2013.03.002
88
DyerR. R.FordK. I.RobinsonR. A. S. (2019). The roles of S-nitrosylation and S-glutathionylation in Alzheimer’s disease. Methods Enzymol.626, 499–538. 10.1016/bs.mie.2019.08.004
89
EngelmanR.Weisman-ShomerP.ZivT.XuJ.ArnérE. S.BenharM. (2013). Multilevel regulation of 2-Cys peroxiredoxin reaction cycle by S-nitrosylation. J. Biol. Chem.288, 11312–11324. 10.1074/jbc.m112.433755
90
ErbM.MeinenS.BarzaghiP.SumanovskiL. T.Courdier-FrühI.RüeggM. A.et al. (2009). Omigapil ameliorates the pathology of muscle dystrophy caused by laminin-α2 deficiency. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.331, 787–795. 10.1124/jpet.109.160754
91
FangJ.NakamuraT.ChoD.-H.GuZ.LiptonS. A. (2007). S-nitrosylation of peroxiredoxin 2 promotes oxidative stress-induced neuronal cell death in Parkinson’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A104, 18742–18747. 10.1073/pnas.0705904104
92
FargM. A.SooK. Y.WalkerA. K.PhamH.OrianJ.HorneM. K.et al. (2012). Mutant FUS induces endoplasmic reticulum stress in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and interacts with protein disulfide-isomerase. Neurobiol. Aging33, 2855–2868. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.02.009
93
FarrS. A.PoonH. F.Dogrukol-AkD.DrakeJ.BanksW. A.EyermanE.et al. (2003). The antioxidants α-lipoic acid and N-acetylcysteine reverse memory impairment and brain oxidative stress in aged SAMP8 mice. J. Neurochem.84, 1173–1183. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01580.x
94
FengY.WangX. (2012). Antioxidant therapies for Alzheimer’s disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.2012:472932. 10.1155/2012/472932
95
FilogranaR.BeltraminiM.BubaccoL.BisagliaM. (2016). Anti-oxidants in Parkinson’s disease therapy: a critical point of view. Curr. Neuropharmacol.14, 260–271. 10.2174/1570159x13666151030102718
96
FinkelT. (2011). Signal transduction by reactive oxygen species. J. Cell Biol.194, 7–15. 10.1083/jcb.201102095
97
FlanneryP. J.TrushinaE. (2019). Mitochondrial dynamics and transport in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Cell. Neurosci.98, 109–120. 10.1016/j.mcn.2019.06.009
98
FormanH. J.TorresM.FukutoJ. (2002). “Redox signaling,” in Oxygen/Nitrogen Radicals: Cell Injury and Disease, eds VallyathanV.ShiX.CastranovaV. (Boston, MA: Springer US), 49–62.
99
FormanH. J.UrsiniF.MaiorinoM. (2014). An overview of mechanisms of redox signaling. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.73, 2–9. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.01.018
100
FosterT. C. (2006). Biological markers of age-related memory deficits: treatment of senescent physiology. CNS Drugs20, 153–166. 10.2165/00023210-200620020-00006
101
FosterT. C. (2007). Calcium homeostasis and modulation of synaptic plasticity in the aged brain. Aging Cell6, 319–325. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00283.x
102
FosterT. C. (2012). Dissecting the age-related decline on spatial learning and memory tasks in rodent models: N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in senescent synaptic plasticity. Prog. Neurobiol.96, 283–303. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.01.007
103
FosterT. C.KumarA. (2002). Calcium dysregulation in the aging brain. Neuroscientist8, 297–301. 10.1177/107385840200800404
104
FosterT. C.NorrisC. M. (1997). Age-associated changes in Ca2+-dependent processes: relation to hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Hippocampus7, 602–612. 10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1997)7:6<602::aid-hipo3>3.0.co;2-g
105
FraA.YoboueE. D.SitiaR. (2017). Cysteines as redox molecular switches and targets of disease. Front. Mol. Neurosci.10:167. 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00167
106
FranceschiC.CapriM.MontiD.GiuntaS.OlivieriF.SeviniF.et al. (2007). Inflammaging and anti-inflammaging: a systemic perspective on aging and longevity emerged from studies in humans. Mech. Ageing Dev.128, 92–105. 10.1016/j.mad.2006.11.016
107
FriedmanJ. (2010a). “The role of free radicals in the nervous system,” in Oxidative Stress and Free Radical Damage in Neurology. Oxidative Stress in Applied Basic Research and Clinical Practice, eds GadothN.GöbelH. H. (Totowa, NJ: Humana Press), 1–17.
108
FriedmanJ. (2010b). “Why is the nervous system vulnerable to oxidative stress?,” in Oxidative Stress in Applied Basic Research and Clinical Practice, eds GadothN.GöbelH. H. (Totowa, NJ: Humana Press), 19–27.
109
FriguetB. (2006). Oxidized protein degradation and repair in ageing and oxidative stress. FEBS Lett.580, 2910–2916. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.03.028
110
FrijhoffJ.WinyardP. G.ZarkovicN.DaviesS. S.StockerR.ChengD.et al. (2015). Clinical relevance of biomarkers of oxidative stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal.23, 1144–1170. 10.1089/ars.2015.6317
111
FruddK.BurgoyneT.BurgoyneJ. R. (2018). Oxidation of Atg3 and Atg7 mediates inhibition of autophagy. Nat. Commun.9:95. 10.1038/s41467-017-02352-z
112
GalloglyM. M.MieyalJ. J. (2007). Mechanisms of reversible protein glutathionylation in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol.7, 381–391. 10.1016/j.coph.2007.06.003
113
GantnerB. N.LaFondK. M.BoniniM. G. (2020). Nitric oxide in cellular adaptation and disease. Redox Biol.34:101550. 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101550
114
GarciaJ.HanD.SanchetiH.YapL. P.KaplowitzN.CadenasE. (2010). Regulation of mitochondrial glutathione redox status and protein glutathionylation by respiratory substrates. J. Biol. Chem.285, 39646–39654. 10.1074/jbc.m110.164160
115
GasullaJ.Beltrán GonzálezA. N.CalvoD. J. (2012). Nitric oxide potentiation of the homomeric ρ1 GABA(C) receptor function. Br. J. Pharmacol.167, 1369–1377. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02087.x
116
GhatakS.DolatabadiN.GaoR.WuY.ScottH.TrudlerD.et al. (2020). NitroSynapsin ameliorates hypersynchronous neural network activity in Alzheimer hiPSC models. Mol. Psychiatry [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1038/s41380-020-0776-7
117
GiuliviC.PacificiR. E.DaviesK. J. (1994). Exposure of hydrophobic moieties promotes the selective degradation of hydrogen peroxide-modified hemoglobin by the multicatalytic proteinase complex, proteasome. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.311, 329–341. 10.1006/abbi.1994.1245
118
GloireG.PietteJ. (2009). Redox regulation of nuclear post-translational modifications during NF-κB activation. Antioxid. Redox Signal.11, 2209–2222. 10.1089/ars.2009.2463
119
GoY.-M.ChandlerJ. D.JonesD. P. (2015). The cysteine proteome. Free Radic. Biol. Med.84, 227–245. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.03.022
120
GoY.-M.DuongD. M.PengJ.JonesD. P. (2011). Protein cysteines map to functional networks according to steady-state level of oxidation. J. Proteomics Bioinform.4, 196–209. 10.4172/jpb.1000190
121
GoY.-M.JonesD. P. (2008). Redox compartmentalization in eukaryotic cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1780, 1273–1290. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.01.011
122
GoY.-M.JonesD. P. (2013). The redox proteome. J. Biol. Chem.288, 26512–26520. 10.1074/jbc.R113.464131
123
GoY.-M.JonesD. P. (2017). Redox theory of aging: implications for health and disease. Clin. Sci.131, 1669–1688. 10.1042/cs20160897
124
GokulranganG.ZaidiA.MichaelisM. L.SchöneichC. (2007). Proteomic analysis of protein nitration in rat cerebellum: effect of biological aging. J. Neurochem.100, 1494–1504. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04334.x
125
GonosE. S.KapetanouM.SereikaiteJ.BartoszG.NaparłoK.GrzesikM.et al. (2018). Origin and pathophysiology of protein carbonylation, nitration and chlorination in age-related brain diseases and aging. Aging10, 868–901. 10.18632/aging.101450
126
GonzalezV.PalR.NarayanM. (2010). The oxidoreductase behavior of protein disulfide isomerase impedes fold maturation of endoplasmic reticulum-processed proteins in the pivotal structure-coupled step of oxidative folding: implications for subcellular protein trafficking. Biochemistry49, 6282–6289. 10.1021/bi100753s
127
Gorelenkova MillerO.MieyalJ. J. (2015). Sulfhydryl-mediated redox signaling in inflammation: role in neurodegenerative diseases. Arch. Toxicol.89, 1439–1467. 10.1007/s00204-015-1496-7
128
GottfredsenR. H.LarsenU. G.EnghildJ. J.PetersenS. V. (2013). Hydrogen peroxide induce modifications of human extracellular superoxide dismutase that results in enzyme inhibition. Redox Biol.1, 24–31. 10.1016/j.redox.2012.12.004
129
GouldN. S.EvansP.Martínez-AcedoP.MarinoS. M.GladyshevV. N.CarrollK. S.et al. (2015). Site-specific proteomic mapping identifies selectively modified regulatory cysteine residues in functionally distinct protein networks. Chem. Biol.22, 965–975. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.06.010
130
GoyalM. S.VlassenkoA. G.BlazeyT. M.SuY.CoutureL. E.DurbinT. J.et al. (2017). Loss of brain aerobic glycolysis in normal human aging. Cell Metab.26, 353.e3–360.e3. 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.07.010
131
GranoldM.MoosmannB.Staib-LasarzikI.ArendtT.Del ReyA.EngelhardK.et al. (2015). High membrane protein oxidation in the human cerebral cortex. Redox Biol.4, 200–207. 10.1016/j.redox.2014.12.013
132
GrimmS.HoehnA.DaviesK. J.GruneT. (2011). Protein oxidative modifications in the ageing brain: consequence for the onset of neurodegenerative disease. Free Radic. Res.45, 73–88. 10.3109/10715762.2010.512040
133
GruneT.ReinheckelT.DaviesK. J. (1997). Degradation of oxidized proteins in mammalian cells. FASEB J.11, 526–534. 10.1096/fasebj.11.7.9212076
134
GrunwaldM. S.PiresA. S.Zanotto-FilhoA.GasparottoJ.GelainD. P.DemartiniD. R.et al. (2014). The oxidation of HSP70 is associated with functional impairment and lack of stimulatory capacity. Cell Stress Chaperones19, 913–925. 10.1007/s12192-014-0516-5
135
Guzman-MartinezL.MaccioniR. B.AndradeV.NavarreteL. P.PastorM. G.Ramos-EscobarN. (2019). Neuroinflammation as a common feature of neurodegenerative disorders. Front. Pharmacol.10:1008. 10.3389/fphar.2019.01008
136
HallA.KarplusP. A.PooleL. B. (2009). Typical 2-Cys peroxiredoxins—structures, mechanisms and functions. FEBS J.276, 2469–2477. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06985.x
137
HallA.NelsonK.PooleL. B.KarplusP. A. (2011). Structure-based insights into the catalytic power and conformational dexterity of peroxiredoxins. Antioxid. Redox Signal.15, 795–815. 10.1089/ars.2010.3624
138
HalloranM.ParakhS.AtkinJ. D. (2013). The role of s-nitrosylation and s-glutathionylation of protein disulphide isomerase in protein misfolding and neurodegeneration. Int. J. Cell Biol.2013:797914. 10.1155/2013/797914
139
HampelH.O’BryantS. E.MolinuevoJ. L.ZetterbergH.MastersC. L.ListaS.et al. (2018). Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer disease: mapping the road to the clinic. Nat. Rev. Neurol.14, 639–652. 10.1038/s41582-018-0079-7
140
HandyD. E.LoscalzoJ. (2012). Redox regulation of mitochondrial function. Antioxid. Redox Signal.16, 1323–1367. 10.1089/ars.2011.4123
141
HaraM. R.AgrawalN.KimS. F.CascioM. B.FujimuroM.OzekiY.et al. (2005). S-nitrosylated GAPDH initiates apoptotic cell death by nuclear translocation following Siah1 binding. Nat. Cell Biol.7, 665–674. 10.1038/ncb1268
142
HaraM. R.CascioM. B.SawaA. (2006a). GAPDH as a sensor of NO stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1762, 502–509. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2006.01.012
143
HaraM. R.ThomasB.CascioM. B.BaeB.-I.HesterL. D.DawsonV. L.et al. (2006b). Neuroprotection by pharmacologic blockade of the GAPDH death cascade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A103, 3887–3889. 10.1073/pnas.0511321103
144
HarmanD. (1956). Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. J. Gerontol.11, 298–300. 10.1093/geronj/11.3.298
145
HarmanD. (2006). Free radical theory of aging: an update. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci.1067, 10–21. 10.1196/annals.1354.003
146
HarrazM. M.SnyderS. H. (2015). Nitric oxide-GAPDH transcriptional signaling mediates behavioral actions of cocaine. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets14, 757–763. 10.2174/1871527314666150529150143
147
HartlD.SchuldtV.ForlerS.ZabelC.KloseJ.RoheM. (2012). Presymptomatic alterations in energy metabolism and oxidative stress in the APP23 mouse model of Alzheimer disease. J. Proteome Res.11, 3295–3304. 10.1021/pr300021e
148
HessD. T.MatsumotoA.NudelmanR.StamlerJ. S. (2001). S-nitrosylation: spectrum and specificity. Nat. Cell Biol.3, E46–E48. 10.1038/35055152
149
HidalgoC. (2005). Cross talk between Ca2+ and redox signalling cascades in muscle and neurons through the combined activation of ryanodine receptors/Ca2+ release channels. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.360, 2237–2246. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1759
150
HidalgoC.Arias-CavieresA. (2016). Calcium, reactive oxygen species, and synaptic plasticity. Physiology31, 201–215. 10.1152/physiol.00038.2015
151
HipkissA. R. (2019). Aging, Alzheimer’s disease and dysfunctional glycolysis; similar effects of too much and too little. Aging Dis.10, 1328–1331. 10.14336/ad.2019.0611
152
HöhnT. J.GruneT. (2014). The proteasome and the degradation of oxidized proteins: part III-Redox regulation of the proteasomal system. Redox Biol.2, 388–394. 10.1016/j.redox.2013.12.029
153
HöhnA.WeberD.JungT.OttC.HugoM.KochlikB.et al. (2017). Happily (n)ever after: aging in the context of oxidative stress, proteostasis loss and cellular senescence. Redox Biol.11, 482–501. 10.1016/j.redox.2016.12.001
154
HollasM. A.Ben AissaM.LeeS. H.Gordon-BlakeJ. M.ThatcherG. R. J. (2019). Pharmacological manipulation of cGMP and NO/cGMP in CNS drug discovery. Nitric Oxide82, 59–74. 10.1016/j.niox.2018.10.006
155
HonjoY.KanekoS.ItoH.HoribeT.NagashimaM.NakamuraM.et al. (2011). Protein disulfide isomerase-immunopositive inclusions in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler.12, 444–450. 10.3109/17482968.2011.594055
156
HoriguchiT.UryuK.GiassonB. I.IschiropoulosH.LightFootR.BellmannC.et al. (2003). Nitration of tau protein is linked to neurodegeneration in tauopathies. Am. J. Pathol.163, 1021–1031. 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63462-1
157
Houée-LévinC.BobrowskiK.HorakovaL.KarademirB.SchöneichC.DaviesM. J.et al. (2015). Exploring oxidative modifications of tyrosine: an update on mechanisms of formation, advances in analysis and biological consequences. Free Radic. Res.49, 347–373. 10.3109/10715762.2015.1007968
158
HsiehH.-L.YangC.-M. (2013). Role of redox signaling in neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases. Biomed Res. Int.2013:484613. 10.1155/2013/484613
159
HurdT. R.RequejoR.FilipovskaA.BrownS.PrimeT. A.RobinsonA. J.et al. (2008). Complex I within oxidatively stressed bovine heart mitochondria is glutathionylated on Cys-531 and Cys-704 of the 75-kDa subunit: potential role of CYS residues in decreasing oxidative damage. J. Biol. Chem.283, 24801–24815. 10.1074/jbc.m803432200
160
IgnarroL. J. (1990). Biosynthesis and metabolism of endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.30, 535–560. 10.1146/annurev.pa.30.040190.002535
161
JangH. H.LeeK. O.ChiY. H.JungB. G.ParkS. K.ParkJ. H.et al. (2004). Two enzymes in one: two yeast peroxiredoxins display oxidative stress-dependent switching from a peroxidase to a molecular chaperone function. Cell117, 625–635. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.05.002
162
JennerP. (2003). Oxidative stress in Parkinson’s disease. Ann. Neurol.53, S26–S38. 10.1002/ana.10483
163
JeonG. S.NakamuraT.LeeJ.-S.ChoiW.-J.AhnS.-W.LeeK.-W.et al. (2014). Potential effect of S-nitrosylated protein disulfide isomerase on mutant SOD1 aggregation and neuronal cell death in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Mol. Neurobiol.49, 796–807. 10.1007/s12035-013-8562-z
164
JohnstonJ. A.WardC. L.KopitoR. R. (1998). Aggresomes: a cellular response to misfolded proteins. J. Cell Biol.143, 1883–1898. 10.1083/jcb.143.7.1883
165
JonesD. P. (2006). Redefining oxidative stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal.8, 1865–1879. 10.1089/ars.2006.8.1865
166
JonesD. P. (2015). Redox theory of aging. Redox Biol.5, 71–79. 10.1016/j.redox.2015.03.004
167
JonesD. P.GoY. M. (2010). Redox compartmentalization and cellular stress. Diabetes Obes. Metab.12, 116–125. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01266.x
168
JonesD. P.SiesH. (2015). The redox code. Antioxid. Redox Signal.23, 734–746. 10.1089/ars.2015.6247
169
JoshiA. U.SawN. L.ShamlooM.Mochly-RosenD. (2017). Drp1/Fis1 interaction mediates mitochondrial dysfunction, bioenergetic failure and cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Oncotarget9, 6128–6143. 10.18632/oncotarget.23640
170
JovéM.Portero-OtínM.NaudíA.FerrerI.PamplonaR. (2014). Metabolomics of human brain aging and age-related neurodegenerative diseases. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.73, 640–657. 10.1097/nen.0000000000000091
171
JungT.BaderN.GruneT. (2007). Lipofuscin: formation, distribution, and metabolic consequences. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci.1119, 97–111. 10.1196/annals.1404.008
172
JungT.GruneT. (2008). The proteasome and its role in the degradation of oxidized proteins. IUBMB Life60, 743–752. 10.1002/iub.114
173
JungT.HöhnA.GruneT. (2014). The proteasome and the degradation of oxidized proteins: part III—redox regulation of the proteasomal system. Redox Biol.2, 388–394. 10.1016/j.redox.2013.12.029
174
JungY.KimH.MinS. H.RheeS. G.JeongW. (2008). Dynein light chain LC8 negatively regulates NF-κB through the redox-dependent interaction with IκBα. J. Biol. Chem.283, 23863–23871. 10.1074/jbc.M803072200
175
KabeY.AndoK.HiraoS.YoshidaM.HandaH. (2005). Redox regulation of NF-κB activation: distinct redox regulation between the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Antioxid. Redox Signal.7, 395–403. 10.1089/ars.2005.7.395
176
KarplusP. A. (2015). A primer on peroxiredoxin biochemistry. Free Radic. Biol. Med.80, 183–190. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.10.009
177
KawagishiH.FinkelT. (2014). Unraveling the truth about Antioxidants: ROS and disease: finding the right balance. Nat. Med.20, 711–713. 10.1038/nm.3625
178
KhooK. K.NortonR. S. (2011). “Role of disulfide bonds in peptide and protein conformation,” in Amino Acids, Peptides and Proteins in Organic Chemistry, ed. HughesA. B. (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH), 395–417.
179
KilI. S.ParkJ. W. (2005). Regulation of mitochondrial NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase activity by glutathionylation. J. Biol. Chem.280, 10846–10854. 10.1074/jbc.m411306200
180
KimG. H.KimJ. E.RhieS. J.YoonS. (2015). The role of oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Exp. Neurobiol.24, 325–340. 10.5607/en.2015.24.4.325
181
KimS. U.JinM. H.KimY. S.LeeS. H.ChoY. S.ChoK. J.et al. (2011). Peroxiredoxin II preserves cognitive function against age-linked hippocampal oxidative damage. Neurobiol. Aging32, 1054–1068. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.05.017
182
KlattP.MolinaE. P.De LacobaM. G.PadillaC. A.Martinez-GalesteoE.BarcenaJ. A.et al. (1999). Redox regulation of c-Jun DNA binding by reversible S-glutathiolation. FASEB J.13, 1481–1490. 10.1096/fasebj.13.12.1481
183
KlomsiriC.KarplusP. A.PooleL. B. (2011). Cysteine-based redox switches in enzymes. Antioxid. Redox Signal.14, 1065–1077. 10.1089/ars.2010.3376
184
KogaH.KaushikS.CuervoA. M. (2011). Protein homeostasis and aging: the importance of exquisite quality control. Ageing Res. Rev.10, 205–215. 10.1016/j.arr.2010.02.001
185
KorolainenM. A.PirttiläT. (2009). Cerebrospinal fluid, serum and plasma protein oxidation in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neurol. Scand.119, 32–38. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01057.x
186
KorolainenM. A.NymanT. A.NyyssönenP.HartikainenE. S.PirttiläT. (2007). Multiplexed proteomic analysis of oxidation and concentrations of cerebrospinal fluid proteins in Alzheimer disease. Clin. Chem.53, 657–665. 10.1373/clinchem.2006.078014
187
KorsS.GeijtenbeekK.ReitsE.Schipper-KromS. (2019). Regulation of proteasome activity by (Post-)transcriptional mechanisms. Front. Mol. Biosci.6, 48–48. 10.3389/fmolb.2019.00048
188
KragtenE.LalandeI.ZimmermannK.RoggoS.SchindlerP.MullerD.et al. (1998). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, the putative target of the antiapoptotic compounds CGP 3466 and R-(−)-deprenyl. J. Biol. Chem.273, 5821–5828. 10.1074/jbc.273.10.5821
189
KumarA.BodhinathanK.FosterT. C. (2009). Susceptibility to calcium dysregulation during brain aging. Front. Aging Neurosci.1:2. 10.3389/neuro.24.002.2009
190
KumarA.YeglaB.FosterT. C. (2018). Redox signaling in neurotransmission and cognition during aging. Antioxid. Redox Signal.28, 1724–1745. 10.1089/ars.2017.7111
191
KummerM. P.HermesM.DelekarteA.HammerschmidtT.KumarS.TerwelD.et al. (2011). Nitration of tyrosine 10 critically enhances amyloid β aggregation and plaque formation. Neuron71, 833–844. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.07.001
192
KuoY.-M.WebsterS.EmmerlingM. R.De LimaN.RoherA. E. (1998). Irreversible dimerization/tetramerization and post-translational modifications inhibit proteolytic degradation of Aβ peptides of Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1406, 291–298. 10.1016/s0925-4439(98)00014-3
193
KurokawaT.AsadaS.NishitaniS.HazekiO. (2001). Age-related changes in manganese superoxide dismutase activity in the cerebral cortex of senescence-accelerated prone and resistant mouse. Neurosci. Lett.298, 135–138. 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)01755-9
194
LacampagneA.LiuX.ReikenS.BussiereR.MeliA. C.LauritzenI.et al. (2017). Post-translational remodeling of ryanodine receptor induces calcium leak leading to Alzheimer’s disease-like pathologies and cognitive deficits. Acta Neuropathol.134, 749–767. 10.1007/s00401-017-1733-7
195
LamP. Y.YinF.HamiltonR. T.BoverisA.CadenasE. (2009). Elevated neuronal nitric oxide synthase expression during ageing and mitochondrial energy production. Free Radic. Res.43, 431–439. 10.1080/10715760902849813
196
LambethJ. D.NeishA. S. (2014). Nox enzymes and new thinking on reactive oxygen: a double-edged sword revisited. Annu. Rev. Pathol.9, 119–145. 10.1146/annurev-pathol-012513-104651
197
LannerJ. T.GeorgiouD. K.JoshiA. D.HamiltonS. L. (2010). Ryanodine receptors: structure, expression, molecular details, and function in calcium release. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.2:a003996. 10.1101/cshperspect.a003996
198
LefakiM.PapaevgeniouN.ChondrogianniN. (2017). Redox regulation of proteasome function. Redox Biol.13, 452–458. 10.1016/j.redox.2017.07.005
199
LewczukP.RiedererP.O’BryantS. E.VerbeekM. M.DuboisB.VisserP. J.et al. (2018). Cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers for neurodegenerative dementias: an update of the consensus of the task force on biological markers in psychiatry of the world federation of societies of biological psychiatry. World J. Biol. Psychiatry19, 244–328. 10.1080/15622975.2017.1375556
200
LiS.JinM.KoeglspergerT.ShepardsonN. E.ShankarG. M.SelkoeD. J. (2011). Soluble Aβ oligomers inhibit long-term potentiation through a mechanism involving excessive activation of extrasynaptic NR2B-containing NMDA receptors. J. Neurosci.31, 6627–6638. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0203-11.2011
201
LiangF.ShiL.ZhengJ.ChenS.WangY.ZhangJ. (2017). Neuroprotective effects of CGP3466B on apoptosis are modulated by protein-L-isoaspartate (D-aspartate) O-methyltransferase/Mst1 pathways after traumatic brain injury in rats. Sci. Rep.7:9201. 10.1038/s41598-017-08196-3
202
LiptonS. A. (2006). Paradigm shift in neuroprotection by NMDA receptor blockade: memantine and beyond. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.5, 160–170. 10.1038/nrd1958
203
LiptonS. A. (2007). Pathologically-activated therapeutics for neuroprotection: mechanism of NMDA receptor block by memantine and S-nitrosylation. Curr. Drug Targets8, 621–632. 10.2174/138945007780618472
204
LiptonS.ChoiY.-B.TakahashiH.ZhangD.LiW.GodzikA.et al. (2002). Cysteine regulation of protein function—as exemplified by NMDA-receptor modulation. Trends Neurosci.25, 474–480. 10.1016/s0166-2236(02)02245-2
205
LiptonS. A.RosenbergP. A. (1994). Excitatory amino acids as a final common pathway for neurologic disorders. N. Engl. J. Med.330, 613–622. 10.1056/nejm199403033300907
206
LiuX.BetzenhauserM. J.ReikenS.MeliA. C.XieW.ChenB. X.et al. (2012). Role of leaky neuronal ryanodine receptors in stress-induced cognitive dysfunction. Cell150, 1055–1067. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.052
207
LiuZ.ZhouT.ZieglerA. C.DimitrionP.ZuoL. (2017). Oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases: from molecular mechanisms to clinical applications. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.2017:2525967. 10.1155/2017/2525967
208
LjubuncicP. S.Bar-ShaiM.ReznickA. Z. (2008). “The role of reactive nitrogen species (RNS) in the activation of nuclear factor κ B (NFkB) and its implications for biological systems: the question of balance,” in Oxidants in Biology: A Question of Balance, eds ValacchiG.DavisP. A. (Dordrecht: Springer), 67–109.
209
LjubuncicP.GochmanE.ReznickA. Z. (2010). “Nitrosative stress in aging—its importance and biological implications in NF-κB signaling,” in Aging and Age-Related Disorders, eds BondyS.MaieseK. (Totowa, NJ: Humana Press), 27–54.
210
López-OtínC.BlascoM. A.PartridgeL.SerranoM.KroemerG. (2013). The hallmarks of aging. Cell153, 1194–1217. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039
211
LuoJ.LeeS. H.VandeVredeL.QinZ.Ben AissaM.LarsonJ.et al. (2016). A multifunctional therapeutic approach to disease modification in multiple familial mouse models and a novel sporadic model of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener.11:35. 10.1186/s13024-016-0103-6
212
LuoJ.LeeS. H.VandeVredeL.QinZ.PiyankarageS.TavassoliE.et al. (2015). Re-engineering a neuroprotective, clinical drug as a procognitive agent with high in vivo potency and with GABAA potentiating activity for use in dementia. BMC Neurosci.16:67. 10.1186/s12868-015-0208-9
213
MaM. W.WangJ.ZhangQ.WangR.DhandapaniK. M.VadlamudiR. K.et al. (2017). NADPH oxidase in brain injury and neurodegenerative disorders. Mol. Neurodegener.12:7. 10.1186/s13024-017-0150-7
214
MaillouxR. J.JinX.WillmoreW. G. (2014). Redox regulation of mitochondrial function with emphasis on cysteine oxidation reactions. Redox Biol.2, 123–139. 10.1016/j.redox.2013.12.011
215
ManczakM.ReddyP. H. (2012). Abnormal interaction between the mitochondrial fission protein Drp1 and hyperphosphorylated tau in Alzheimer’s disease neurons: implications for mitochondrial dysfunction and neuronal damage. Hum. Mol. Genet.21, 2538–2547. 10.1093/hmg/dds072
216
MarinoS. M.GladyshevV. N. (2010). Structural analysis of cysteine S-nitrosylation: a modified acid-based motif and the emerging role of trans-nitrosylation. J. Mol. Biol.395, 844–859. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.10.042
217
MarinoS. M.GladyshevV. N. (2012). Analysis and functional prediction of reactive cysteine residues. J. Biol. Chem.287, 4419–4425. 10.1074/jbc.R111.275578
218
MarkesberyW. R. (1997). Oxidative stress hypothesis in Alzheimer’s disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med.23, 134–147. 10.1016/s0891-5849(96)00629-6
219
MatsusakiM.KanemuraS.KinoshitaM.LeeY. H.InabaK.OkumuraM. (2020). The protein disulfide isomerase family: from proteostasis to pathogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj.1864:129338. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.04.003
220
MattsonM. P.ArumugamT. V. (2018). Hallmarks of brain aging: adaptive and pathological modification by metabolic states. Cell Metab.27, 1176–1199. 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.05.011
221
McCordJ. M. (2000). The evolution of free radicals and oxidative stress. Am. J. Med.108, 652–659. 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00412-5
222
McDonaghB.SakellariouG. K.SmithN. T.BrownridgeP.JacksonM. J. (2014). Differential cysteine labeling and global label-free proteomics reveals an altered metabolic state in skeletal muscle aging. J. Proteome Res.13, 5008–5021. 10.1021/pr5006394
223
McLainA. L.CormierP. J.KinterM.SzwedaL. I. (2013). Glutathionylation of α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase: the chemical nature and relative susceptibility of the cofactor lipoic acid to modification. Free Radic. Biol. Med.61, 161–169. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.03.020
224
MedinasD. B.RozasP.Martínez TraubF.WoehlbierU.BrownR. H.BoscoD. A.et al. (2018). Endoplasmic reticulum stress leads to accumulation of wild-type SOD1 aggregates associated with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A115, 8209–8214. 10.1073/pnas.1801109115
225
MengF.YaoD.ShiY.KabakoffJ.WuW.ReicherJ.et al. (2011). Oxidation of the cysteine-rich regions of parkin perturbs its E3 ligase activity and contributes to protein aggregation. Mol. Neurodegener.6:34. 10.1186/1750-1326-6-34
226
MengerK. E.JamesA. M.CocheméH. M.HarbourM. E.ChouchaniE. T.DingS.et al. (2015). Fasting, but not aging, dramatically alters the redox status of cysteine residues on proteins in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Rep.11, 1856–1865. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.05.033
227
MieyalJ. J.GalloglyM. M.QanungoS.SabensE. A.SheltonM. D. (2008). Molecular mechanisms and clinical implications of reversible protein S-glutathionylation. Antioxid. Redox Signal.10, 1941–1988. 10.1089/ars.2008.2089
228
MisetaA.CsutoraP. (2000). Relationship between the occurrence of cysteine in proteins and the complexity of organisms. Mol. Biol. Evol.17, 1232–1239. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026406
229
MitsumotoH.SantellaR. M.LiuX.BogdanovM.ZipprichJ.WuH.-C.et al. (2008). Oxidative stress biomarkers in sporadic ALS. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler.9, 177–183. 10.1080/17482960801933942
230
MnatsakanyanR.MarkoutsaS.WalbrunnK.RoosA.VerhelstS. H. L.ZahediR. P. (2019). Proteome-wide detection of S-nitrosylation targets and motifs using bioorthogonal cleavable-linker-based enrichment and switch technique. Nat. Commun.10:2195. 10.1038/s41467-019-10182-4
231
MnatsakanyanR.ShemaG.BasikM.BatistG.BorchersC. H.SickmannA.et al. (2018). Detecting post-translational modification signatures as potential biomarkers in clinical mass spectrometry. Expert Rev. Proteomics15, 515–535. 10.1080/14789450.2018.1483340
232
MoldogazievaN. T.MokhosoevI. M.FeldmanN. B.LutsenkoS. V. (2018). ROS and RNS signalling: adaptive redox switches through oxidative/nitrosative protein modifications. Free Radic. Res.52, 507–543. 10.1080/10715762.2018.1457217
233
MolinM.YangJ.HanzénS.ToledanoM. B.LabarreJ.NyströmT. (2011). Life span extension and H2O2 resistance elicited by caloric restriction require the peroxiredoxin tsa1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell43, 823–833. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.027
234
MolokanovaE.AkhtarM. W.Sanz-BlascoS.TuS.Piña-CrespoJ. C.McKercherS. R.et al. (2014). Differential effects of synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors on Aβ-induced nitric oxide production in cerebrocortical neurons. J. Neurosci.34, 5023–5028. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2907-13.2014
235
MooreJ. J.SaadabadiA. (2020). “Selegiline,” in StatPearls, (Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing).
236
MullenL.HanschmannE.-M.LilligC. H.HerzenbergL. A.GhezziP. (2015). Cysteine oxidation targets peroxiredoxins 1 and 2 for exosomal release through a novel mechanism of redox-dependent secretion. Mol. Med.21, 98–108. 10.2119/molmed.2015.00033
237
MuñozP.ArdilesÁ. O.Pérez-EspinosaB.Núñez-EspinosaC.Paula-LimaA.González-BillaultC.et al. (2020). Redox modifications in synaptic components as biomarkers of cognitive status, in brain aging and disease. Mech. Ageing Dev.189:111250. 10.1016/j.mad.2020.111250
238
MurphyM. P. (2009). How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem. J.417, 1–13. 10.1042/bj20081386
239
MurphyM. P.HolmgrenA.LarssonN.-G.HalliwellB.ChangC. J.KalyanaramanB.et al. (2011). Unraveling the biological roles of reactive oxygen species. Cell Metab.13, 361–366. 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.03.010
240
MusiccoC.CapelliV.PesceV.TimperioA. M.CalvaniM.MosconiL.et al. (2009). Accumulation of overoxidized Peroxiredoxin III in aged rat liver mitochondria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1787, 890–896. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.03.002
241
NakamuraT.LiptonS. A. (2016). Protein S-nitrosylation as a therapeutic target for neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.37, 73–84. 10.1016/j.tips.2015.10.002
242
NakamuraT.LiptonS. A. (2017). ‘SNO’-storms compromise protein activity and mitochondrial metabolism in neurodegenerative disorders. Trends Endocrinol. Metab.28, 879–892. 10.1016/j.tem.2017.10.004
243
NakamuraT.LiptonS. A. (2020). Nitric oxide-dependent protein post-translational modifications impair mitochondrial function and metabolism to contribute to neurodegenerative diseases. Antioxid. Redox Signal.32, 817–833. 10.1089/ars.2019.7916
244
NakamuraT.TuS.AkhtarM. W.SunicoC. R.OkamotoS.-I.LiptonS. A. (2013). Aberrant protein s-nitrosylation in neurodegenerative diseases. Neuron78, 596–614. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.005
245
NakatoR.OhkuboY.KonishiA.ShibataM.KanekoY.IwawakiT.et al. (2015). Regulation of the unfolded protein response via S-nitrosylation of sensors of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Sci. Rep.5:14812. 10.1038/srep14812
246
NaoiM.MaruyamaW.Shamoto-NagaiM. (2020). Rasagiline and selegiline modulate mitochondrial homeostasis, intervene apoptosis system and mitigate α-synuclein cytotoxicity in disease-modifying therapy for Parkinson’s disease. J. Neural Transm.127, 131–147. 10.1007/s00702-020-02150-w
247
NavarroA.BoverisA. (2004). Rat brain and liver mitochondria develop oxidative stress and lose enzymatic activities on aging. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.287, R1244–R1249. 10.1152/ajpregu.00226.2004
248
NayerniaZ.JaquetV.KrauseK. H. (2014). New insights on NOX enzymes in the central nervous system. Antioxid. Redox Signal.20, 2815–2837. 10.1089/ars.2013.5703
249
NeumannC. A.KrauseD. S.CarmanC. V.DasS.DubeyD. P.AbrahamJ. L.et al. (2003). Essential role for the peroxiredoxin Prdx1 in erythrocyte antioxidant defence and tumour suppression. Nature424, 561–565. 10.1038/nature01819
250
NiforouK.CheimonidouC.TrougakosI. P. (2014). Molecular chaperones and proteostasis regulation during redox imbalance. Redox Biol.2, 323–332. 10.1016/j.redox.2014.01.017
251
NyströmT.YangJ.MolinM. (2012). Peroxiredoxins, gerontogenes linking aging to genome instability and cancer. Genes Dev.26, 2001–2008. 10.1101/gad.200006.112
252
OhM. M.OliveiraF. A.DisterhoftJ. F. (2010). Learning and aging related changes in intrinsic neuronal excitability. Front. Aging Neurosci.2:2. 10.3389/neuro.24.002.2010
253
OkamotoS.NakamuraT.CieplakP.ChanS. F.KalashnikovaE.LiaoL.et al. (2014). S-nitrosylation-mediated redox transcriptional switch modulates neurogenesis and neuronal cell death. Cell Rep.8, 217–228. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.06.005
254
OkamotoS. I.PrikhodkoO.Pina-CrespoJ.AdameA.McKercherS. R.BrillL. M.et al. (2019). NitroSynapsin for the treatment of neurological manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex in a rodent model. Neurobiol. Dis.127, 390–397. 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.03.029
255
OláhováM.TaylorS. R.KhazaipoulS.WangJ.MorganB. A.MatsumotoK.et al. (2008). A redox-sensitive peroxiredoxin that is important for longevity has tissue- and stress-specific roles in stress resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A105, 19839–19844. 10.1073/pnas.0805507105
256
OliverD. M. A.ReddyP. H. (2019). Molecular basis of Alzheimer’s disease: focus on mitochondria. J. Alzheimers Dis.72, S95–S116. 10.3233/JAD-190048
257
Ortuño-SahagúnD.PallàsM.Rojas-MayorquínA. E. (2014). Oxidative stress in aging: advances in proteomic approaches. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.2014:573208. 10.1155/2014/573208
258
PaceN. J.WeerapanaE. (2013). Diverse functional roles of reactive cysteines. ACS Chem. Biol.8, 283–296. 10.1021/cb3005269
259
PacificiR. E.KonoY.DaviesK. J. (1993). Hydrophobicity as the signal for selective degradation of hydroxyl radical-modified hemoglobin by the multicatalytic proteinase complex, proteasome. J. Biol. Chem.268, 15405–15411.
260
PajaresM.CuadradoA.EngedalN.JirsovaZ.CahovaM. (2018). The role of free radicals in autophagy regulation: implications for ageing. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.2018:2450748. 10.1155/2018/2450748
261
PajaresM.Jiménez-MorenoN.DiasI. H. K.DebelecB.VuceticM.FladmarkK. E.et al. (2015). Redox control of protein degradation. Redox Biol.6, 409–420. 10.1016/j.redox.2015.07.003
262
PankratzN.ForoudT. (2007). Genetics of Parkinson disease. Genet. Med.9, 801–811. 10.1097/gim.0b013e31815bf97c
263
ParakhS.ShadfarS.PerriE. R.RagagninA. M. G.PiattoniC. V.FogolínM. B.et al. (2020). The redox activity of protein disulfide isomerase inhibits ALS phenotypes in cellular and zebrafish models. iScience23:101097. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101097
264
ParkJ. W.PiszczekG.RheeS. G.ChockP. B. (2011). Glutathionylation of peroxiredoxin I induces decamer to dimers dissociation with concomitant loss of chaperone activity. Biochemistry50, 3204–3210. 10.1021/bi101373h
265
PaulB. D.SbodioJ. I.SnyderS. H. (2018). Cysteine metabolism in neuronal redox homeostasis. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.39, 513–524. 10.1016/j.tips.2018.02.007
266
PérezM. J.PonceD. P.Osorio-FuentealbaC.BehrensM. I.QuintanillaR. A. (2017). Mitochondrial bioenergetics is altered in fibroblasts from patients with sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurosci.11:553. 10.3389/fnins.2017.00553
267
PérezV. I.PierceA.de WaalE. M.WardW. F.BokovA.ChaudhuriA.et al. (2010). “Chapter 8—detection and quantification of protein disulfides in biological tissues: a fluorescence-based proteomic approach,” in Methods in Enzymology, eds CadenasE.PackerL. (Academic Press), 161–177.
268
PerluigiM.Di DomenicoF.GiorgiA.SchininàM. E.CocciaR.CiniC.et al. (2010). Redox proteomics in aging rat brain: involvement of mitochondrial reduced glutathione status and mitochondrial protein oxidation in the aging process. J. Neurosci. Res.88, 3498–3507. 10.1002/jnr.22500
269
PerluigiM.SwomleyA. M.ButterfieldD. A. (2014). Redox proteomics and the dynamic molecular landscape of the aging brain. Ageing Res. Rev.13, 75–89. 10.1016/j.arr.2013.12.005
270
PeskinA. V.DickerhofN.PoyntonR. A.PatonL. N.PaceP. E.HamptonM. B.et al. (2013). Hyperoxidation of Peroxiredoxins 2 and 3: rate constants for the reactions of the sulfenic acid of the peroxidatic cysteine. J. Biol. Chem.288, 14170–14177. 10.1074/jbc.m113.460881
271
PeskinA. V.PaceP. E.BehringJ. B.PatonL. N.SoethoudtM.BachschmidM. M.et al. (2016). Glutathionylation of the active site cysteines of peroxiredoxin 2 and recycling by glutaredoxin. J. Biol. Chem.291, 3053–3062. 10.1074/jbc.m115.692798
272
Pham-HuyL. A.HeH.Pham-HuyC. (2008). Free radicals, antioxidants in disease and health. Int. J. Biomed. Sci.4, 89–96.
273
PomattoL. C. D.DaviesK. J. A. (2018). Adaptive homeostasis and the free radical theory of ageing. Free Radic. Biol. Med.124, 420–430. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.06.016
274
PooleL. B.NelsonK. J. (2008). Discovering mechanisms of signaling-mediated cysteine oxidation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.12, 18–24. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.01.021
275
PoonH. F.CalabreseV.CalvaniM.ButterfieldD. A. (2006a). Proteomics analyses of specific protein oxidation and protein expression in aged rat brain and its modulation by L-acetylcarnitine: insights into the mechanisms of action of this proposed therapeutic agent for CNS disorders associated with oxidative stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal.8, 381–394. 10.1089/ars.2006.8.381
276
PoonH. F.ShepherdH. M.ReedT. T.CalabreseV.StellaA. M.PennisiG.et al. (2006b). Proteomics analysis provides insight into caloric restriction mediated oxidation and expression of brain proteins associated with age-related impaired cellular processes: mitochondrial dysfunction, glutamate dysregulation and impaired protein synthesis. Neurobiol. Aging27, 1020–1034. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.05.014
277
PoonH. F.CastegnaA.FarrS. A.ThongboonkerdV.LynnB. C.BanksW. A.et al. (2004). Quantitative proteomics analysis of specific protein expression and oxidative modification in aged senescence-accelerated-prone 8 mice brain. Neuroscience126, 915–926. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.04.046
278
ProkaiL.YanL. J.Vera-SerranoJ. L.StevensS. M.Jr.ForsterM. J. (2007). Mass spectrometry-based survey of age-associated protein carbonylation in rat brain mitochondria. J. Mass Spectrom.42, 1583–1589. 10.1002/jms.1345
279
PrzedborskiS.ChenQ.VilaM.GiassonB. I.DjaldattiR.VukosavicS.et al. (2001). Oxidative post-translational modifications of α-synuclein in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurochem.76, 637–640. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00174.x
280
QinZ.LuoJ.VandeVredeL.TavassoliE.FaM.TeichA. F.et al. (2012). Design and synthesis of neuroprotective methylthiazoles and modification as NO-chimeras for neurodegenerative therapy. J. Med. Chem.55, 6784–6801. 10.1021/jm300353r
281
RachakondaG.XiongY.SekharK. R.StamerS. L.LieblerD. C.FreemanM. L. (2008). Covalent modification at Cys151 dissociates the electrophile sensor Keap1 from the ubiquitin ligase CUL3. Chem. Res. Toxicol.21, 705–710. 10.1021/tx700302s
282
RahaS.RobinsonB. H. (2000). Mitochondria, oxygen free radicals, disease and ageing. Trends Biochem. Sci.25, 502–508. 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)01674-1
283
RaimondiD.OrlandoG.VrankenW. F. (2014). Clustering-based model of cysteine co-evolution improves disulfide bond connectivity prediction and reduces homologous sequence requirements. Bioinformatics31, 1219–1225. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu794
284
RainwaterR.ParksD.AndersonM. E.TegtmeyerP.MannK. (1995). Role of cysteine residues in regulation of p53 function. Mol. Cell. Biol.15, 3892–3903. 10.1128/mcb.15.7.3892
285
RajuK.DouliasP.-T.EvansP.KrizmanE. N.JacksonJ. G.HorynO.et al. (2015). Regulation of brain glutamate metabolism by nitric oxide and S-nitrosylation. Sci. Signal.8:ra68. 10.1126/scisignal.aaa4312
286
RandallL. M.Dalla RizzaJ.ParsonageD.SantosJ.MehlR. A.LowtherW. T.et al. (2019). Unraveling the effects of peroxiredoxin 2 nitration; role of C-terminal tyrosine 193. Free Radic. Biol. Med.141, 492–501. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.07.016
287
RandallL. M.MantaB.HugoM.GilM.BatthyànyC.TrujilloM.et al. (2014). Nitration transforms a sensitive peroxiredoxin 2 into a more active and robust peroxidase. J. Biol. Chem.289, 15536–15543. 10.1074/jbc.m113.539213
288
RaveraS.PodestàM.SabatiniF.DagninoM.CilloniD.FioriniS.et al. (2019). Discrete changes in glucose metabolism define aging. Sci. Rep.9:10347. 10.1038/s41598-019-46749-w
289
RayP. D.HuangB.-W.TsujiY. (2012). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis and redox regulation in cellular signaling. Cell. Signal.24, 981–990. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.01.008
290
ReddieK. G.CarrollK. S. (2008). Expanding the functional diversity of proteins through cysteine oxidation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.12, 746–754. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.07.028
291
ReyesJ. F.FuY.VanaL.KanaanN. M.BinderL. I. (2011). Tyrosine nitration within the proline-rich region of tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Am. J. Pathol.178, 2275–2285. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.01.030
292
ReynaertN. L.van der VlietA.GualaA. S.McGovernT.HristovaM.PantanoC.et al. (2006). Dynamic redox control of NF-κB through glutaredoxin-regulated S-glutathionylation of inhibitory κB kinase β. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A103, 13086–13091. 10.1073/pnas.0603290103
293
ReynoldsM. R.ReyesJ. F.FuY.BigioE. H.Guillozet-BongaartsA. L.BerryR. W.et al. (2006). Tau nitration occurs at tyrosine 29 in the fibrillar lesions of Alzheimer’s disease and other tauopathies. J. Neurosci.26, 10636–10645. 10.1523/jneurosci.2143-06.2006
294
RheeS. G. (2016). Overview on peroxiredoxin. Mol. Cells39, 1–5. 10.14348/molcells.2016.2368
295
RheeS. G.KilI. S. (2017). Multiple functions and regulation of mammalian peroxiredoxins. Annu. Rev. Biochem.86, 749–775. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014431
296
RheeS. G.WooH. A. (2011). Multiple functions of peroxiredoxins: peroxidases, sensors and regulators of the intracellular messenger H2O2 and protein chaperones. Antioxid. Redox Signal.15, 781–794. 10.1089/ars.2010.3393
297
RiedererI. M.SchiffrinM.KövariE.BourasC.RiedererB. M. (2009). Ubiquitination and cysteine nitrosylation during aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. Bull.80, 233–241. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.04.018
298
RistowM. (2014). Unraveling the truth about antioxidants: mitohormesis explains ROS-induced health benefits. Nat. Med.20, 709–711. 10.1038/nm.3624
299
RistowM.SchmeisserK. (2014). Mitohormesis: promoting health and lifespan by increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Dose Response12, 288–341. 10.2203/dose-response.13-035.ristow
300
RizzaS.CardaciS.MontagnaC.Di GiacomoG.De ZioD.BordiM.et al. (2018). S-nitrosylation drives cell senescence and aging in mammals by controlling mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A115, E3388–E3397. 10.1073/pnas.1722452115
301
RobeyT. T.PanegyresP. K. (2019). Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in neurodegenerative disorders. Future Neurol.14:FNL6. 10.2217/fnl-2018-0029
302
RoherA. E.KokjohnT. A.ClarkeS. G.SierksM. R.MaaroufC. L.SerranoG. E.et al. (2017). APP/Aβ structural diversity and Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Neurochem. Int.110, 1–13. 10.1016/j.neuint.2017.08.007
303
RoosG.FoloppeN.MessensJ. (2013). Understanding the pKa of redox cysteines: the key role of hydrogen bonding. Antioxid. Redox Signal.18, 94–127. 10.1089/ars.2012.4521
304
RyanB. J.NissimA.WinyardP. G. (2014). Oxidative post-translational modifications and their involvement in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Redox Biol.2, 715–724. 10.1016/j.redox.2014.05.004
305
Sabens LiedhegnerE. A.GaoX. H.MieyalJ. J. (2012). Mechanisms of altered redox regulation in neurodegenerative diseases—focus on S—glutathionylation. Antioxid. Redox Signal.16, 543–566. 10.1089/ars.2011.4119
306
SaccocciaF.Di MiccoP.BoumisG.BrunoriM.KoutrisI.MieleA. E.et al. (2012). Moonlighting by different stressors: crystal structure of the chaperone species of a 2-Cys peroxiredoxin. Structure20, 429–439. 10.1016/j.str.2012.01.004
307
SagotY.ToniN.PerreletD.LurotS.KingB.RixnerH.et al. (2000). An orally active anti-apoptotic molecule (CGP 3466B) preserves mitochondria and enhances survival in an animal model of motoneuron disease. Br. J. Pharmacol.131, 721–728. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703633
308
SalzanoS.ChecconiP.HanschmannE.-M.LilligC. H.BowlerL. D.ChanP.et al. (2014). Linkage of inflammation and oxidative stress via release of glutathionylated peroxiredoxin-2, which acts as a danger signal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A111, 12157–12162. 10.1073/pnas.1401712111
309
SantosA. L.LindnerA. B. (2017). Protein posttranslational modifications: roles in aging and age-related disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.2017:5716409. 10.1155/2017/5716409
310
SavyonM.EngelenderS. (2020). SUMOylation in α-synuclein homeostasis and pathology. Front. Aging Neurosci.12:167. 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00167
311
SawaA.KhanA. A.HesterL. D.SnyderS. H. (1997). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase: nuclear translocation participates in neuronal and nonneuronal cell death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A94, 11669–11674. 10.1073/pnas.94.21.11669
312
SbodioJ. I.SnyderS. H.PaulB. D. (2019). Redox mechanisms in neurodegeneration: from disease outcomes to therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid. Redox Signal.30, 1450–1499. 10.1089/ars.2017.7321
313
Scherz-ShouvalR.ShvetsE.FassE.ShorerH.GilL.ElazarZ. (2019). Reactive oxygen species are essential for autophagy and specifically regulate the activity of Atg4. EMBO J.38:e101812. 10.15252/embj.2019101812
314
SchöneichC. (2011). Cysteine residues as catalysts for covalent peptide and protein modification: a role for thiyl radicals?Biochem. Soc. Trans.39, 1254–1259. 10.1042/bst0391254
315
SchreckR.RieberP.BaeuerleP. A. (1991). Reactive oxygen intermediates as apparently widely used messengers in the activation of the NF-κ B transcription factor and HIV-1. EMBO J.10, 2247–2258. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07761.x
316
SchulzE.WenzelP.MünzelT.DaiberA. (2014). Mitochondrial redox signaling: Interaction of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species with other sources of oxidative stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal.20, 308–324. 10.1089/ars.2012.4609
317
SenN.HaraM. R.KornbergM. D.CascioM. B.BaeB. I.ShahaniN.et al. (2008). Nitric oxide-induced nuclear GAPDH activates p300/CBP and mediates apoptosis. Nat. Cell Biol.10, 866–873. 10.1038/ncb1747
318
SenT.SahaP.SenN. (2018). Nitrosylation of GAPDH augments pathological tau acetylation upon exposure to amyloid-β. Sci. Signal.11:eaao6765. 10.1126/scisignal.aao6765
319
ShenL.ChenC.YangA.ChenY.LiuQ.NiJ. (2015). Redox proteomics identification of specifically carbonylated proteins in the hippocampi of triple transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mice at its earliest pathological stage. J. Proteomics123, 101–113. 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.04.005
320
SiesH. (2019). “Chapter 13—oxidative stress: eustress and distress in redox homeostasis,” in Stress: Physiology, Biochemistry and Pathology, ed. FinkG. (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press), 153–163.
321
SimonL.SzilágyiG.BoriZ.OrbayP.NagyZ. (2001). (−)-d-Deprenyl attenuates apoptosis in experimental brain ischaemia. Eur. J. Pharmacol.430, 235–241. 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)01375-9
322
SiqueiraI. R.FochesattoC.de AndradeA.SantosM.HagenM.Bello-KleinA.et al. (2005). Total antioxidant capacity is impaired in different structures from aged rat brain. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci.23, 663–671. 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2005.03.001
323
SmithC. D.CarneyJ. M.Starke-ReedP. E.OliverC. N.StadtmanE. R.FloydR. A.et al. (1991). Excess brain protein oxidation and enzyme dysfunction in normal aging and in Alzheimer disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A88, 10540–10543. 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10540
324
SongI.-K.LeeJ.-J.ChoJ.-H.JeongJ.ShinD.-H.LeeK.-J. (2016). Degradation of redox-sensitive proteins including peroxiredoxins and dj-1 is promoted by oxidation-induced conformational changes and ubiquitination. Sci. Rep.6:34432. 10.1038/srep34432
325
StadtmanE. R. (1988). Protein modification in aging. J. Gerontol.43, B112–B120. 10.1093/geronj/43.5.b112
326
StadtmanE. R.LevineR. L. (2003). Free radical-mediated oxidation of free amino acids and amino acid residues in proteins. Amino Acids25, 207–218. 10.1007/s00726-003-0011-2
327
StamlerJ. S.TooneE. J.LiptonS. A.SucherN. J. (1997). (S)NO signals: translocation, regulation, and a consensus motif. Neuron18, 691–696. 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80310-4
328
StefanisL. (2012). α-Synuclein in Parkinson’s disease. Cold Spring Harb. perspect. Med.2:a009399. 10.1101/cshperspect.a009399
329
SultanaR.ButterfieldD. A. (2013). Oxidative modification of brain proteins in Alzheimer’s disease: perspective on future studies based on results of redox proteomics studies. J. Alzheimers Dis.33, S243–S251. 10.3233/jad-2012-129018
330
SultanaR.MecocciP.MangialascheF.CecchettiR.BaglioniM.ButterfieldD. A. (2011a). Increased protein and lipid oxidative damage in mitochondria isolated from lymphocytes from patients with Alzheimer’s disease: insights into the role of oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease and initial investigations into a potential biomarker for this dementing disorder. J. Alzheimers Dis.24, 77–84. 10.3233/jad-2011-101425
331
SultanaR.RobinsonR. A. S.Di DomenicoF.AbdulH. M.St ClairD. K.MarkesberyW. R.et al. (2011b). Proteomic identification of specifically carbonylated brain proteins in APP(NLh)/APP(NLh) × PS-1(P264L)/PS-1(P264L) human double mutant knock-in mice model of Alzheimer disease as a function of age. J. Proteomics74, 2430–2440. 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.06.015
332
SultanaR.PerluigiM.NewmanS. F.PierceW. M.CiniC.CocciaR.et al. (2010). Redox proteomic analysis of carbonylated brain proteins in mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer’s disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal.12, 327–336. 10.1089/ars.2009.2810
333
SunM.-a.ZhangQ.WangY.GeW.GuoD. (2016). Prediction of redox-sensitive cysteines using sequential distance and other sequence-based features. BMC Bioinformatics17:316. 10.1186/s12859-016-1185-4
334
SunicoC. R.NakamuraT.RockensteinE.ManteM.AdameA.ChanS. F.et al. (2013). S-Nitrosylation of parkin as a novel regulator of p53-mediated neuronal cell death in sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener.8:29. 10.1186/1750-1326-8-29
335
SunicoC. R.SultanA.NakamuraT.DolatabadiN.ParkerJ.ShanB.et al. (2016). Role of sulfiredoxin as a peroxiredoxin-2 denitrosylase in human iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A113, E7564–E7571. 10.1073/pnas.1608784113
336
SvistunovaD. M.SimonJ. N.RembezaE.CrabtreeM.YueW. W.OliverP. L.et al. (2019). Oxidation resistance 1 regulates post-translational modifications of peroxiredoxin 2 in the cerebellum. Free Radic. Biol. Med.130, 151–162. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.10.447
337
TakahashiH.ShinY.ChoS. J.ZagoW. M.NakamuraT.GuZ.et al. (2007). Hypoxia enhances S-nitrosylation-mediated NMDA receptor inhibition via a thiol oxygen sensor motif. Neuron53, 53–64. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.023
338
TakahashiH.XiaP.CuiJ.TalantovaM.BodhinathanK.LiW.et al. (2015). Pharmacologically targeted NMDA receptor antagonism by NitroMemantine for cerebrovascular disease. Sci. Rep.5:14781. 10.1038/srep14781
339
TalantovaM.Sanz-BlascoS.ZhangX.XiaP.AkhtarM. W.OkamotoS.et al. (2013). Aβ induces astrocytic glutamate release, extrasynaptic NMDA receptor activation and synaptic loss. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A110, E2518–2527. 10.1073/pnas.1306832110
340
TegederI. (2019). Nitric oxide mediated redox regulation of protein homeostasis. Cell. Signal.53, 348–356. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.10.019
341
TermanA.BrunkU. T. (2004). Lipofuscin. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.36, 1400–1404. 10.1016/j.biocel.2003.08.009
342
TimmermannB.JarolimS.RussmayerH.KerickM.MichelS.KrügerA.et al. (2010). A new dominant peroxiredoxin allele identified by whole-genome re-sequencing of random mutagenized yeast causes oxidant-resistance and premature aging. Aging2, 475–486. 10.18632/aging.100187
343
TominT.SchittmayerM.HonederS.HeiningerC.Birner-GruenbergerR. (2019). Irreversible oxidative post-translational modifications in heart disease. Expert Rev. Proteomics16, 681–693. 10.1080/14789450.2019.1645602
344
TopfU.SuppanzI.SamlukL.WrobelL.BöserA.SakowskaP.et al. (2018). Quantitative proteomics identifies redox switches for global translation modulation by mitochondrially produced reactive oxygen species. Nat. Commun.9:324. 10.1038/s41467-017-02694-8
345
TrachoothamD.LuW.OgasawaraM. A.NilsaR.-D. V.HuangP. (2008). Redox regulation of cell survival. Antioxid. Redox Signal.10, 1343–1374. 10.1089/ars.2007.1957
346
TramutolaA.LanzillottaC.PerluigiM.ButterfieldD. A. (2017). Oxidative stress, protein modification and Alzheimer disease. Brain Res. Bull.133, 88–96. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2016.06.005
347
TrushinaE.NemutluE.ZhangS.ChristensenT.CampJ.MesaJ.et al. (2012). Defects in mitochondrial dynamics and metabolomic signatures of evolving energetic stress in mouse models of familial Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One7:e32737. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032737
348
TuS.AkhtarM. W.EscorihuelaR. M.Amador-ArjonaA.SwarupV.ParkerJ.et al. (2017). NitroSynapsin therapy for a mouse MEF2C haploinsufficiency model of human autism. Nat. Commun.8:1488. 10.1038/s41467-017-01563-8
349
TuranoC.CoppariS.AltieriF.FerraroA. (2002). Proteins of the PDI family: unpredicted non-ER locations and functions. J. Cell. Physiol.193, 154–163. 10.1002/jcp.10172
350
UeharaT.NakamuraT.YaoD.ShiZ.-Q.GuZ.MaY.et al. (2006). S-Nitrosylated protein-disulphide isomerase links protein misfolding to neurodegeneration. Nature441, 513–517. 10.1038/nature04782
351
ValleC.CarrìM. T. (2017). Cysteine modifications in the pathogenesis of ALS. Front. Mol. Neurosci.10:5. 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00005
352
van der ReestJ.LillaS.ZhengL.ZanivanS.GottliebE. (2018). Proteome-wide analysis of cysteine oxidation reveals metabolic sensitivity to redox stress. Nat. Commun.9:1581. 10.1038/s41467-018-04003-3
353
VandevredeL.TavassoliE.LuoJ.QinZ.YueL.PepperbergD. R.et al. (2014). Novel analogues of chlormethiazole are neuroprotective in four cellular models of neurodegeneration by a mechanism with variable dependence on GABAA receptor potentiation. Br. J. Pharmacol.171, 389–402. 10.1111/bph.12454
354
VenkateshappaC.HarishG.MahadevanA.Srinivas BharathM. M.ShankarS. K. (2012). Elevated oxidative stress and decreased antioxidant function in the human hippocampus and frontal cortex with increasing age: implications for neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem. Res.37, 1601–1614. 10.1007/s11064-012-0755-8
355
von BernhardiR.Eugenin-von BernhardiL.EugeninJ. (2015). Microglial cell dysregulation in brain aging and neurodegeneration. Front. Aging Neurosci.7:124. 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00124
356
WaldmeierP. C.BoultonA. A.CoolsA. R.KatoA. C.TattonW. G. (2000). Neurorescuing effects of the GAPDH ligand CGP 3466B. J. Neural Transm. Suppl.60, 197–214. 10.1007/978-3-7091-6301-6_13
357
WalkerA. K.AtkinJ. D. (2011). Mechanisms of neuroprotection by protein disulphide isomerase in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurol. Res. Int.2011:317340. 10.1155/2011/317340
358
WalkerA. K.FargM. A.ByeC. R.McLeanC. A.HorneM. K.AtkinJ. D. (2009). Protein disulphide isomerase protects against protein aggregation and is S-nitrosylated in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain133, 105–116. 10.1093/brain/awp267
359
WallS. B.OhJ.-Y.DiersA. R.LandarA. (2012). Oxidative modification of proteins: an emerging mechanism of cell signaling. Front. Physiol.3:369. 10.3389/fphys.2012.00369
360
WangY.EuJ.WashburnM.GongT.ChenH. S.JamesW. L.et al. (2006). The pharmacology of aminoadamantane nitrates. Curr. Alzheimer Res.3, 201–204. 10.2174/156720506777632808
361
WangS. B.MurrayC. I.ChungH. S.Van EykJ. E. (2013). Redox regulation of mitochondrial ATP synthase. Trends Cardiovasc. Med.23, 14–18. 10.1016/j.tcm.2012.08.005
362
WangS.SongJ.TanM.AlbersK. M.JiaJ. (2012). Mitochondrial fission proteins in peripheral blood lymphocytes are potential biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Neurol.19, 1015–1022. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03670.x
363
WangX.SuB.LeeH. G.LiX.PerryG.SmithM. A.et al. (2009). Impaired balance of mitochondrial fission and fusion in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci.29, 9090–9103. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1357-09.2009
364
WangY.SørensenM. G.ZhengQ.ZhangC.KarsdalM. A.HenriksenK. (2012a). Will posttranslational modifications of brain proteins provide novel serological markers for dementias?Int. J. Alzheimers Dis.2012:209409. 10.1155/2012/209409
365
WangY.YangJ.YiJ. (2012b). Redox sensing by proteins: oxidative modifications on cysteines and the consequent events. Antioxid. Redox Signal.16, 649–657. 10.1089/ars.2011.4313
366
WangC.YuJ.HuoL.WangL.FengW.WangC.-C. (2012). Human protein-disulfide isomerase is a redox-regulated chaperone activated by oxidation of domain a’. J. Biol. Chem.287, 1139–1149. 10.1074/jbc.m111.303149
367
WaniR.NagataA.MurrayB. W. (2014). Protein redox chemistry: post-translational cysteine modifications that regulate signal transduction and drug pharmacology. Front. Pharmacol.5:224. 10.3389/fphar.2014.00224
368
WengS.-L.HuangK.-Y.KaunangF. J.HuangC.-H.KaoH.-J.ChangT.-H.et al. (2017). Investigation and identification of protein carbonylation sites based on position-specific amino acid composition and physicochemical features. BMC Bioinformatics18:66. 10.1186/s12859-017-1472-8
369
WilbyM. J.HutchinsonP. J. (2004). The pharmacology of chlormethiazole: a potential neuroprotective agent?CNS Drug Rev.10, 281–294. 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2004.tb00028.x
370
WillemsP. H.RossignolR.DieterenC. E.MurphyM. P.KoopmanW. J. (2015). Redox homeostasis and mitochondrial dynamics. Cell Metab.22, 207–218. 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.06.006
371
WongC.-M.MarcocciL.DasD.WangX.LuoH.Zungu-EdmondsonM.et al. (2013). Mechanism of protein decarbonylation. Free Radic. Biol. Med.65, 1126–1133. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.09.005
372
WooH. A.JeongW.ChangT.-S.ParkK. J.ParkS. J.YangJ. S.et al. (2005). Reduction of cysteine sulfinic acid by sulfiredoxin is specific to 2-cys peroxiredoxins. J. Biol. Chem.280, 3125–3128. 10.1074/jbc.C400496200
373
WoodZ. A.SchröderE.Robin HarrisJ.PooleL. B. (2003). Structure, mechanism and regulation of peroxiredoxins. Trends Biochem. Sci.28, 32–40. 10.1016/s0968-0004(02)00003-8
374
XiaoH.JedrychowskiM. P.SchweppeD. K.HuttlinE. L.YuQ.HeppnerD. E.et al. (2020). A quantitative tissue-specific landscape of protein redox regulation during aging. Cell180, 968.e24–983.e24. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.012
375
XuR.SerritellaA. V.SenT.FarookJ. M.SedlakT. W.BarabanJ.et al. (2013). Behavioral effects of cocaine mediated by nitric oxide-GAPDH transcriptional signaling. Neuron78, 623–630. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.021
376
YakovlevV. A.BaraniI. J.RabenderC. S.BlackS. M.LeachJ. K.GravesP. R.et al. (2007). Tyrosine nitration of IκBα: a novel mechanism for NF-κB activation. Biochemistry46, 11671–11683. 10.1021/bi701107z
377
YanL. J.SumienN.ThangthaengN.ForsterM. J. (2013). Reversible inactivation of dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase by mitochondrial hydrogen peroxide. Free Radic. Res.47, 123–133. 10.3109/10715762.2012.752078
378
YaoD.GuZ.NakamuraT.ShiZ.-Q.MaY.GastonB.et al. (2004). Nitrosative stress linked to sporadic Parkinson’s disease: S-nitrosylation of parkin regulates its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A101, 10810–10814. 10.1073/pnas.0405661101
379
YapL.-P.GarciaJ. V.HanD.CadenasE. (2009). The energy-redox axis in aging and age-related neurodegeneration. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.61, 1283–1298. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.015
380
YinF.SanchetiH.PatilI.CadenasE. (2016). Energy metabolism and inflammation in brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med.100, 108–122. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.04.200
381
YuQ.SaliA.Van der MeulenJ.CreedenB. K.Gordish-DressmanH.RutkowskiA.et al. (2013). Omigapil treatment decreases fibrosis and improves respiratory rate in dy(2J) mouse model of congenital muscular dystrophy. PLoS One8:e65468. 10.1371/journal.pone.0065468
382
YunJ.FinkelT. (2014). Mitohormesis. Cell Metab.19, 757–766. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.01.011
383
ZahidS.KhanR.OellerichM.AhmedN.AsifA. R. (2014). Differential S-nitrosylation of proteins in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience256, 126–136. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.10.026
384
ZhangG.LiJ.PurkayasthaS.TangY.ZhangH.YinY.et al. (2013). Hypothalamic programming of systemic ageing involving IKK-β, NF-κB and GnRH. Nature497, 211–216. 10.1038/nature12143
385
ZhangY.SunC.XiaoG.ShanH.TangL.YiY.et al. (2019). S-nitrosylation of the Peroxiredoxin-2 promotes S-nitrosoglutathione-mediated lung cancer cells apoptosis via AMPK-SIRT1 pathway. Cell Death Dis.10:329. 10.1038/s41419-019-1561-x
Summary
Keywords
redox, post-translational modifications, cysteine residues, aging, neurodegenerative diseases, brain, S-nitrosation
Citation
Finelli MJ (2020) Redox Post-translational Modifications of Protein Thiols in Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Conditions—Focus on S-Nitrosation. Front. Aging Neurosci. 12:254. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00254
Received
30 April 2020
Accepted
24 July 2020
Published
03 September 2020
Volume
12 - 2020
Edited by
Bindu Diana Paul, Johns Hopkins University, United States
Reviewed by
Ana Denicola, Universidad de la República, Uruguay; Guoyuan Qi, University of Arizona, United States; John J. Mieyal, Case Western Reserve University, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Finelli.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mattéa J. Finelli mattea.finelli@nottingham.ac.uk
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.