Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mol. Biosci., 23 December 2024
Sec. Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics
This article is part of the Research Topic Clinical Molecular Biological Characteristics of Malignant Tumors View all articles

Prediction of preoperative peritoneal cancer index for pseudomyxoma peritonei by multiple linear regression analysis

Mingjian Bai&#x;Mingjian Bai1Jing Feng&#x;Jing Feng1Jie LiuJie Liu1Yunxiang LiYunxiang Li1Yueming XuYueming Xu2Fucun MaFucun Ma1Ruiqing MaRuiqing Ma3Guowei Liang
Guowei Liang1*Xuekai Liu
Xuekai Liu1*Na Zhao
Na Zhao4*
  • 1Department of Clinical Laboratory, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 2Department of Literature and Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
  • 3Department of Myxoma, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 4Department of Nephrology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China

Background: The aim of the present study was to establish a predictive model to predict the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) preoperatively in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP).

Methods: A total of 372 PMP patients were consecutively included from a prospective follow-up database between 1 June 2013 and 1 June 2023. Nine potential variables, namely, gender, age, Barthel Index (BAI), hemoglobin (Hb), albumin (Alb), D-dimer, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA 125), and CA 19-9, were estimated using multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis with a stepwise selection procedure. The established MLR model was internally validated using K-fold cross-validation. The agreement between the predicted and surgical PCI was assessed using Bland–Altman plots and intraclass correlation (ICC). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Six independent predictors were confirmed by the stepwise MLR analysis with an R2 value of 0.570. The predicted PCI formula was represented as follows: PCI = 19.567 + 2.091 * Gender (male = 1, female = 0) − 0.643 * Alb +4.201 * Lg (D-dimer) + 2.938 * Lg (CEA) + 5.441 * Lg (CA 125) + 1.802 * Lg (CA 19-9). The agreement between predicted and surgical PCI was assessed using Bland–Altman plots, showing a limit of agreement (LoA) between −15.847 (95%CI: −17.2646 to −14.4292) and +15.847 (95%CI: 14.4292–17.2646).

Conclusion: This study represents the first attempt to use an MLR model for the preoperative prediction of PCI in PMP patients. Nevertheless, the MLR model did not perform well enough in predicting preoperative PCI. In the future, more advanced statistical techniques and a radiomics-based CT-PCI-participated MLR model will be developed, which may enhance the predictive ability of PCI.

Background

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare clinical entity characterized by diffuse intra-abdominal gelatinous ascites with mucinous implants on the peritoneal surfaces (Yu, 2019), which mainly originates from the appendix (Darr et al., 2017). The estimated annual incidence of PMP is approximately 1–4 cases per million (Mittal et al., 2017). The currently recommended standard treatment strategy for PMP is complete cytoreduction surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) (Li et al., 2014). In PMP operation, the completeness of cytoreduction (CCR) has been identified as one of the most important prognostic factors for PMP (Mittal et al., 2017), which is consistent with our previous research (Bai et al., 2021).

The peritoneal cancer index (PCI) is used to estimate the tumor burden caused by peritoneal metastases and is negatively correlated with the chances of cytoreduction (Flicek et al., 2016). In patients with colorectal cancer, Sugarbaker et al. first identified a PCI score of at least 20 as commonly representing unresectable disease, while a score less than 20 indicates potentially resectable disease (Da and Sugarbaker, 2006). For PMP, several studies have confirmed that the optimal cut point for PCI in predicting surgical resectability is higher than 20 and varies depending on the population included in the study (Flicek et al., 2016; Votanopoulos et al., 2018; Young et al., 2020). Although PCI could contribute to preoperative patient selection and/or information, the most accurate PCI could only be acquired through laparoscopy or laparotomy (defined as surgical PCI).

In our previous study, we evaluated the correlation between routine laboratory test markers and PCI; however, Spearman’s correlation values between D-dimer, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA 125), CA 19-9, and PCI were only 0.487, 0.509, 0.469, and 0.499, respectively (Feng et al., 2022). A former research concluded that computed tomography (CT)-calculated PCI (CT-PCI) could assess tumor burden preoperatively and select patients for whom complete resection was achievable (Bouquot et al., 2018). However, the agreement between surgical PCI and CT-PCI is not ideal (R = 0.64) (Flicek et al., 2016). In our recent research, we performed a Bland–Altman agreement analysis between the CT-predicted and surgical PCI in PMP of appendiceal origin, with the limit of agreement ranging from −5.459 to 6.321. This is because of the difficulty in distinguishing the boundary between tumor tissue and mucus based on CT, especially for the small intestine regions, which caused overestimation or underestimation by CT-PCI. Hence, CT-PCI cannot predict surgical PCI accurately even in professional PMP treatment centers (Bai et al., 2023). Therefore, accurately predicting PCI preoperatively using a single predictor appears to be very challenging.

The present study aimed to predict surgical PCI preoperatively in PMP patients by multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis. Predictor variables consisted of both clinical baseline data and biomarkers. First, all potential predictor factors related to PCI were preliminarily screened. Then, all the relevant predictors were included in the MLR model and further underwent internal validation.

Methods

Patients

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Aerospace Center Hospital approved the present study (No. 2022-002), and all patients signed an informed consent before undergoing the operation. A total of 1,130 patients diagnosed with PMP were retrieved from the follow-up database of the Myxoma Department between 1 June 2013 and 1 June 2023. The inclusion criterion is as follows: patients who underwent their first standard CRS + HIPEC procedure at our center. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) the patient’s first standard CRS + HIPEC procedure was not performed in our center (n = 603); (b) prior surgical score (PSS) not less than 2 (PSS 2, n = 63; PSS 3, n = 51); (c) received systemic chemotherapy before CRS (n = 29); (d) patients with concomitant other tumors (one with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, one with lymphoma, one with oral cancer, one with lung cancer, one with breast cancer, one with gastric cancer, and one suffered with both breast and thyroid cancer, n = 7); and (e) incomplete surgical record (n = 5). Ultimately, 372 subjects were included in the present study (Figure 1). All procedures were performed by the same surgical team.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the study . A total of 1,130 patients with PMP diagnosis were retrieved between 1 June 2013 and 1 June 2023. Patients whose first time CRS + HIPEC was not performed at our center (n = 603), whose PSS was not less than 2 (PSS 2, n = 63; PSS 3, n = 51), who received systemic chemotherapy before CRS (n = 29), who were combined with other tumors (n = 7), and who had an incomplete surgical record (n = 5) were all excluded. Finally, 372 patients were included in the present study. PMP, pseudomyxoma peritonei; CRS, cytoreductive surgery; HIPEC, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; PSS, prior surgical score.

Predictor variables

The principle for selecting variables is that they are easy to obtain in clinical work and can be measured objectively and accurately, including both basic clinicopathologic information and biomarkers.

Clinicopathologic variables include gender, age, and the Barthel Index (BAI). The BAI is a widely used scale for measuring the activities of daily living (ADL). There are 10 items in the BAI, ranging from 0 (complete dependence on ADL) to 100 points (complete independence on ADL) (Zhou et al., 2021). The BAI assessment was completed by an oncology-trained specialty nursing team.

Routine laboratory test indicators include hemoglobin (HB), albumin (ALB), and D-dimer. Anemia is a well-documented phenomenon that occurs in patients with cancer (Farag et al., 2023), while ALB is recognized as a nutritional status parameter and is associated with chronic inflammation (McMillan et al., 2001). In addition, our previous research confirmed the correlation between D-dimer and PCI in PMP patients (Feng et al., 2022). Based on the conclusions of the previous studies, we consider that the three traditional markers are likely to have a good correlation with PCI; therefore, the three indicators were all included. The three tumor markers commonly used in PMP are CEA, CA 125, and CA 19-9 (Taflampas et al., 2014). The detection method for the three tumor markers was detailed in our previously published work (Bai et al., 2022).

Surgical PCI calculation

PCI represents the most accurate system to draw a detailed preoperative map of carcinomatosis of PMP for the surgeon. Surgical PCI calculation refers to the method described by Sugarbaker and Jablonski (1995).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 16.0; IBM Corporation), MedCalc (version 15.2.2; MedCalc Software, Flanders, Belgium), GraphPad prism (version 8.0; GraphPad Software), and R (version 4.0.5; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna). All continuous data between groups were compared using the t-test or Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate.

The “pwr” package in R was used for sample size calculations. The preset medium effect size was f = 0.15 (Darr et al., 2017), the statistical power (1- β) was 0.80, and the significance level (α) was 0.05. Subsequently, it was calculated that at least 113 PMP patients were required for the MLR model to be constructed in this study. The statistical process consists of three consecutive steps, including screening for predictor variables, building the MLR model, and verifying the model.

First, the preliminary screening of predictive variables was performed before the MLR analysis. The initial judgment of a possible relationship between the predictive continuous variables and PCI was made according to the scatter plot, which shows whether the relationship is linear or non-linear preliminarily (Schneider et al., 2010). D-dimer and the three tumor markers all underwent logarithmic transformation (f (x) = Lg (x)) in order to meet the conditions for linear regression application (Yu et al., 2020). For continuous variables, only the correlation between predictors and PCI not less than 0.30 was included for further MLR analysis in order to avoid overfitting of the model. Gender, as a binary variable, was also included because it has been demonstrated to have different PCI levels in PMP patients (Feng et al., 2022).

Second, a stepwise selection procedure was performed during the MLR analysis. The initially established regression model was further checked for residual independence (Durbin–Watson test), normality, and homogeneity of variance (Levene test). The multicollinearity between predictor variables was assessed using the variance inflation factor (VIF) (Banerjee et al., 2019). The R (multiple regression coefficient) and adjusted R2 values were also calculated. Multiple regression coefficient values >0.7 were regarded as a “strong” correlation, values between 0.50 and 0.70 were interpreted as a “good” correlation, values between 0.3 and 0.5 were treated as a “fair” or “moderate” correlation, and any value < 0.30 was considered a poor correlation. The R2 statistic provided information about the goodness-of-fit of a model, with an R2 value of 1, indicating that the regression line perfectly fit the data (Hazra and Gogtay, 2016).

Finally, the model estimation was completed using the widely used K-fold cross-validation (CV) methods (Jung and Hu, 2015). In a typical K-fold CV procedure for a linear model, the dataset is randomly and evenly split into K parts (if possible). A candidate model is built based on K - 1 parts of the dataset, called a training set. The predictive accuracy of this candidate model is then evaluated on a test set containing the data from the hold-out part. This model validation process was performed using the R project, which calculated the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) to internally validate our established model. Subsequently, based on the Bland–Altman plot and intraclass correlation (ICC), the agreement assessment between the predicted PCI and surgical PCI was performed (Bland and Altman, 1986). The ICC coefficient boundaries <0.4 were regarded as poor; 0.40–0.60 as fair; 0.60–0.74 as good; and >0.75 as strong (Hazra and Gogtay, 2016). A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The median (interquartile range, IQR) PCI of the included 372 patients (208 male patients and 164 female patients) was 27 (14, 32). The mean (standard deviation, SD) age was 57.0 ± 11.4 years. The median BAI was 100 (95, 100). According to the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) criteria, the histopathological grading includes four subtypes: acellular mucin (n = 1), disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis (DPAM) (n = 276), peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (PMCA) (n = 67), and peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis with signet ring cells (PMCA-S) (n = 28). The detailed clinicopathologic characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Clinicopathologic features of 372 included patients with PMP.

The median PCI between male patients and female patients was 29 (16, 34) vs. 24 (11, 30), Z = −3.369, and P < 0.001. The intraoperative PCI did not conform to a normal distribution (kurtosis = −0.972, skewness = −0.591). Followed, Spearman’s rank correlation was used to analyze the correlation between the predictor variables and PCI. The correlation coefficients between the PCI and age, BAI, Hb, Alb, Lg (D-dimer), Lg (CEA), Lg (CA 125), and Lg (CA 19-9) were 0.163 (P = 0.002), −0.180 (P < 0.001), −0.369 (P < 0.001), −0.525 (P < 0.001), 0.568 (P < 0.001), 0.550 (P < 0.001), 0.509 (P < 0.001), and 0.504 (P < 0.001), respectively (Figure 2). Finally, seven predictor variables (gender, Hb, Alb, Lg (D-dimer), Lg (CEA), Lg (CA 125), and Lg (CA 19-9)) were included in the MLR analysis.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Scatterplot between all continuous predictor variables and PCI.

In the MLR analysis using a stepwise method, the F value of 81.932 (P < 0.001) was obtained. The Durbin–Watson statistic was 1.070, indicating that the residuals were independent. The histogram of the standard regression residuals accorded with a normal distribution (Supplementary Figure S1). The standard residuals fluctuated around the zero-scale line, suggesting homogeneity of variance (Supplementary Figure S2). The VIF showed that there was no collinearity problem between the predictor variables. Finally, the present study confirmed six independent predictors associated with PCI: gender, Alb, D-dimer, CEA, CA 125, and CA 19-9. The predicted PCI formula is as follows: PCI = 19.567 + 2.091 * Gender (male = 1, female = 0) − 0.643 * Alb + 4.201 * Lg (D-dimer) + 2.938 * Lg (CEA) + 5.441 * Lg (CA125) + 1.802 * Lg (CA 19-9). The details are shown in Table 2.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Multiple linear regression analysis for predicting PCI in patients with PMP.

The present study used 10-fold cross-validation for estimating the established MLR model. The R2 value was 0.570, MAE was 6.599, and RMSE was 8.110. The Bland–Altman plots between the surgical PCI and predicted PCI using the present equation are described in Figure 3. The plots indicated a significant but weak correlation between the mean predicted and surgical PCI and the difference between the predicted and surgical PCI (r = −0.310). The limit of agreement (LoA) ranged from −15.847 (95% CI: −17.2646 to −14.4292) to +15.847 (95% CI: 14.4292–17.2646). In clinical practice, a discrepancy of ±5–7 PCI points may not be clinically meaningful if it does not influence the ultimate outcome of the surgery (Flicek et al., 2016). Based on this, the maximum allowed difference between methods was defined as 6. The ICC between the surgical and predicted PCI was 0.731 (95% CI: 0.680–0.776), and the multiple dot plots (plotting all data) are shown in Figure 4.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Bland–Altman plots of surgical and predicted PCI.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Distribution of predicted and surgical PCI by the multiple dot plots.

Discussion

The present study developed an MLR model for predicting preoperative PCI with an R2 value of 0.570. Subsequently, the MLR model underwent 10-fold cross-validation, resulting in an RMSE value of 8.110. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first MLR model to predict PCI preoperatively in PMP patients.

Male PMP patients appeared to have significantly higher PCI levels than female patients. In the MLR analysis, the gender factor was an independent predictor of preoperative PCI assessment. Two reasons, perhaps, could explain this phenomenon. First, female patients often present with rapidly enlarging ovarian masses and consequently tend to become symptomatic, or they are clinically obvious, whereas male patients are often asymptomatic initially (Smeenk et al., 2008; Jarvinen and Lepisto, 2010). In short, male patients tend to present at a more advanced stage than female patients. Additionally, earlier presentation in female subjects may also result from a more liberal use of cross-sectional imaging in women with suspected ovarian cancer (Mittal et al., 2017). Therefore, male PMP patients often have a higher tumor burden than female patients before the operation.

The present research found that Alb was the independent predictor with the largest standardized coefficient in the PCI predictive equation. Although PMP is often asymptomatic in the initial stages, it gradually presents with vague abdominal symptoms (such as abdominal distension, discomfort, and pain, and with palpable abdominal masses). When the disease burden is marked, PMP patients eventually experience malnutrition, bowel obstruction, and other complications (Mittal et al., 2017). Alb has been advocated as a useful marker for assessing nutritional status (Thomas et al., 2000), which has even been proven to have an additive effect on mortality (Corona et al., 2018). Hence, when PMP patients experience malnutrition, especially in tumor cachexia, the Alb levels often decrease significantly. Additionally, a previous study confirmed that the Alb-participated modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) could be used as a cost-effective prognostic tool for predicting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in PMP patients (Tan et al., 2017). To the best of our knowledge, there are still few studies on the application value of albumin in PMP patients. In the future, more research studies are needed to confirm the above conclusions, especially the need for multi-center large sample studies.

Tumor markers have been widely assessed in PMP patients; of these, the most commonly determined markers were CEA, CA 125, and CA 19-9. According to literature reviews and our previous research results, CA 19-9 may be the most valuable tumor marker for PMP, which not only acts as an independent prognostic indicator for PMP (Bai et al., 2021; Koh et al., 2013) but could also help predict the completeness of cytoreduction (Bai et al., 2022). The present study even found that CA 19-9 can independently predict the tumor burden of PMP. CA125 is another useful tumor marker in PMP, as it can be elevated in patients with any source of peritoneal irritation (Mittal et al., 2017). CEA, which is expressed by tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, particularly colorectal cancer, may also reflect the tumor burden in PMP patients.

One of the most common complications associated with cancer is the development of a coagulation disorder (Horowitz et al., 2011), and irregularities in coagulation and fibrinolysis are often observed in cancer patients (Lee, 2002). Our previous research confirmed that D-dimer levels were positively correlated with PCI in PMP patients (Feng et al., 2022). In the present research, D-dimer could serve as an independent predictor in the MLR model to predict PCI preoperatively in PMP patients. Previous research even found that D-dimer levels were independently associated with OS in PMP patients (Bai et al., 2021). Therefore, several studies have confirmed that D-dimer is a very useful biomarker for PMP patients that can be integrated into prognostic models. We believe that there may be two reasons for the increase of D-dimer levels in PMP patients. First, as a solid tumor, PMP itself may cause an increase in D-dimer. Second, in clinical practice, we found that PMP patients were prone to deep venous thrombosis (DVT), which was also reported with a rate of 15.7% (11/70) in a previous study (Shiralkar et al., 2017). With the increase in tumor burden, the intra-abdominal pressure of PMP patients also increases, leading to lower extremity venous reflux disorder. This makes it easier for a thrombus to form, resulting in increased D-dimer levels.

Although the predictor variables included in the MLR model are routinely detected indicators and can be easily acquired in clinical practice, the developed model in the present study still seems to be unable to meet the clinical needs after verification. The RMSE was 8.110 in the present MLR model, indicating that the model still needs further improvement to enhance its predictive ability. In the Bland–Altman analysis, the 95% CI of the LoAs exceeded the clinically acceptable range, suggesting that the currently established model cannot accurately predict PCI before the operation. The ICC between the surgical and predicted PCI was not good enough in the present research. Upon careful observation of the multiple dot plots of predicted and surgical PCI, it can be seen that the predictive ability of the model is poor when PCI is less than 10 or greater than 35. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the predictive ability of PCI in this range.

There were several limitations to the present study. First, the predictive variables included in the MLR model are still insufficient. For instance, abdominopelvic CT is considered to be the best imaging modality for the detection of peritoneal tumors (Qi et al., 2017). Nevertheless, only 167 out of 372 patients received preoperative CT-PCI in our research. In order to ensure the number of cases and avoid selection bias, CT-PCI was not included in the MLR analysis temporarily. Second, the RMSE, Bland–Altman, and ICC analyses all indicated the limited predictive ability of the model established in this study, which still cannot accurately predict PCI before surgery. Third, the present study only underwent internal validation but not external validation, which limits the generalizability ability of the model. In addition, the predictive power of the model needs further refinement and improvement in the future.

Conclusion

To conclude, the preoperative prediction of PCI not only contributes to better preoperative patient selection but also provides more informed consent to patients. To the best of our knowledge, the present study innovatively attempted to use the MLR model to predict PCI levels for PMP patients. Nevertheless, the developed MLR model did not perform well enough in predicting preoperative PCI. In the future, more advanced statistical techniques and the radiomics-based CT-PCI-participated MLR model may improve the predictive ability of PCI for PMP patients.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to bGlhbmdndW93ZWk3MjFAMTI2LmNvbQ==.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Aerospace Center Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

MB: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, methodology, resources, software, and writing–original draft. JF: conceptualization, formal analysis, and writing–original draft. JL: data curation, funding acquisition, and writing–review and editing. YL: investigation, software, and writing–review and editing. YX: writing–review and editing. FM: supervision and writing–review and editing. RM: data curation, methodology, and writing–review and editing. GL: conceptualization, validation, and writing–review and editing. XL: validation, visualization, and writing–review and editing. NZ: conceptualization, resources, supervision, validation, and writing–review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The study was supported by the Scientific research and cultivation project of Aerospace Center Hospital (YN202203) and the Hygiene and Health Development Scientific Research Fostering Plan of Haidian District Beijing (HP2022-30-507001).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Shilong Wang for providing some research data for this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2024.1512937/full#supplementary-material

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 1 | Histogram of the standard regression residual in multiple linear regression analysis.

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 2 | Scatter between the standardized predicted value and standardized residual in multiple linear regression analysis.

Abbreviations

PMP, pseudomyxoma peritonei; CRS, complete cytoreduction surgery; HIPEC, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; PCI, peritoneal cancer index; MLR, multiple linear regression; BAI, Barthel Index; ADL, activity of daily living; Hb, hemoglobin; Alb, albumin; VIF, variance inflation factor; CV, cross-validation; RMSE, root mean square error; MAE, mean absolute error; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; DPAM, disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis; PMCA, peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis; PMCA-S, peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis with signet ring cells; mGPS, modified Glasgow prognostic score; DVT, deep venous thrombosis.

References

Bai, M., Chen, J., Xu, Y., Feng, J., Ma, R., Jia, H., et al. (2023). Bland-Altman agreement analysis between CT predicted and surgical peritoneal cancer index in pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin. Sci. Rep. 13 (1), 21520. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-48975-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bai, M., Wang, S., Liang, G., Cai, Y., Lu, Y., Hou, N., et al. (2022). Nomogram to predict incomplete cytoreduction for pseudomyxoma peritonei. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 29 (2), 885–892. doi:10.1245/s10434-021-10725-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bai, M., Wang, S., Ma, R., Cai, Y., Lu, Y., Hou, N., et al. (2021). Nomogram to predict overall survival of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin: a retrospective cohort study. J. Surg. Oncol. 124 (8), 1459–1467. doi:10.1002/jso.26671

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Banerjee, Y., Akhras, A., Khamis, A. H., Alsheikh-Ali, A., and Davis, D. (2019). Investigating the relationship between resilience, stress-coping strategies, and learning approaches to predict academic performance in undergraduate medical students: protocol for a proof-of-concept study. JMIR Res. Protoc. 8 (9), e14677. doi:10.2196/14677

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bland, J. M., and Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (8476), 307–310.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Bouquot, M., Dohan, A., Gayat, E., Barat, M., Glehen, O., Pocard, M., et al. (2018). Prediction of resectability in pseudomyxoma peritonei with a new CT score. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 25 (3), 694–701. doi:10.1245/s10434-017-6275-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Corona, L. P., de Oliveira, D. Y., and Lebrao, M. L. (2018). Markers of nutritional status and mortality in older adults: the role of anemia and hypoalbuminemia. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 18 (1), 177–182. doi:10.1111/ggi.13137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Da, S. R., and Sugarbaker, P. H. (2006). Analysis of prognostic factors in seventy patients having a complete cytoreduction plus perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 203 (6), 878–886. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Darr, U., Renno, A., Alkully, T., Khan, Z., Tiwari, A., Zeb, W., et al. (2017). Diagnosis of Pseudomyxoma peritonei via endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration: a case report and review of literature. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 52 (5), 609–612. doi:10.1080/00365521.2017.1284896

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farag, C. M., Antar, R., Akosman, S., Ng, M., and Whalen, M. J. (2023). What is hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, platelet (HALP) score? A comprehensive literature review of HALP's prognostic ability in different cancer types. Oncotarget 14, 153–172. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.28367

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng, J., Qi, C., Lu, Y., Wei, H., Liang, G., Ma, R., et al. (2022). Preoperative plasma D-Dimer level is correlated with peritoneal cancer index of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei. BMC Surg. 22 (1), 372. doi:10.1186/s12893-022-01812-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Flicek, K., Ashfaq, A., Johnson, C. D., Menias, C., Bagaria, S., and Wasif, N. (2016). Correlation of radiologic with surgical peritoneal cancer index scores in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei and peritoneal carcinomatosis: how well can we predict resectability? J. Gastrointest. Surg. 20 (2), 307–312. doi:10.1007/s11605-015-2880-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hazra, A., and Gogtay, N. (2016). Biostatistics series module 6: correlation and linear regression. Indian J. Dermatol 61 (6), 593–601. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.193662

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Horowitz, N. A., Blevins, E. A., Miller, W. M., Perry, A. R., Talmage, K. E., Mullins, E. S., et al. (2011). Thrombomodulin is a determinant of metastasis through a mechanism linked to the thrombin binding domain but not the lectin-like domain. Blood 118 (10), 2889–2895. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-03-341222

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jarvinen, P., and Lepisto, A. (2010). Clinical presentation of pseudomyxoma peritonei. Scand. J. Surg. 99 (4), 213–216. doi:10.1177/145749691009900406

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jung, Y., and Hu, J. (2015). A K-fold averaging cross-validation procedure. J. Nonparametr Stat. 27 (2), 167–179. doi:10.1080/10485252.2015.1010532

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koh, J. L., Liauw, W., Chua, T., and Morris, D. L. (2013). Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) is an independent prognostic indicator in pseudomyxoma peritonei post cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 4 (2), 173–181. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2012.062

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, A. Y. (2002). Cancer and thromboembolic disease: pathogenic mechanisms. Cancer Treat. Rev. 28 (3), 137–140. doi:10.1016/s0305-7372(02)00044-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Yu, Y., and Liu, Y. (2014). Report on the 9(th) international congress on peritoneal surface malignancies. Cancer Biol. Med. 11 (4), 281–284. doi:10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2014.04.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McMillan, D. C., Watson, W. S., O'Gorman, P., Preston, T., Scott, H. R., and McArdle, C. S. (2001). Albumin concentrations are primarily determined by the body cell mass and the systemic inflammatory response in cancer patients with weight loss. Nutr. Cancer 39 (2), 210–213. doi:10.1207/S15327914nc392_8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mittal, R., Chandramohan, A., and Moran, B. (2017). Pseudomyxoma peritonei: natural history and treatment. Int. J. Hyperth. 33 (5), 511–519. doi:10.1080/02656736.2017.1310938

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qi, Z., Zhang, Y., Dai, Q., Xia, Y., and Jiang, Y. (2017). Peritoneal carcinomatosis in primary ovarian cancer: ultrasound detection and comparison with computed tomography. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 43 (9), 1811–1819. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.02.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schneider, A., Hommel, G., and Blettner, M. (2010). Linear regression analysis: part 14 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch. Arztebl Int. 107 (44), 776–782. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2010.0776

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shiralkar, S. P., Kerr, P., Scott, J., and Sivalingam, P. (2017). Anaesthetic management of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei: a retrospective audit. Anaesth. Intensive Care 45 (4), 490–498. doi:10.1177/0310057X1704500413

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smeenk, R. M., van Velthuysen, M. L., Verwaal, V. J., and Zoetmulder, F. A. (2008). Appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei: a population based study. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 34 (2), 196–201. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sugarbaker, P. H., and Jablonski, K. A. (1995). Prognostic features of 51 colorectal and 130 appendiceal cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis treated by cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann. Surg. 221 (2), 124–132. doi:10.1097/00000658-199502000-00002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Taflampas, P., Dayal, S., Chandrakumaran, K., Mohamed, F., Cecil, T. D., and Moran, B. J. (2014). Pre-operative tumour marker status predicts recurrence and survival after complete cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for appendiceal Pseudomyxoma Peritonei: analysis of 519 patients. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 40 (5), 515–520. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2013.12.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, G. H., Novo, C. A., Dayal, S., Chandrakumaran, K., Mohamed, F., Cecil, T., et al. (2017). The modified Glasgow prognosis score predicts for overall and disease-free survival following cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 43 (2), 388–394. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thomas, D. R., Ashmen, W., Morley, J. E., and Evans, W. J. (2000). Nutritional management in long-term care: development of a clinical guideline. Council for Nutritional Strategies in Long-Term Care. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 55 (12), M725–M734. doi:10.1093/gerona/55.12.m725

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Votanopoulos, K. I., Bartlett, D., Moran, B., Haroon, C. M., Russell, G., Pingpank, J. F., et al. (2018). PCI is not predictive of survival after complete CRS/HIPEC in peritoneal dissemination from high-grade appendiceal primaries. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 25 (3), 674–678. doi:10.1245/s10434-017-6315-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Young, S., Sueda, S. K., Hotta, M., Sung, M. L., OʼConnor, V. V., and Leung, A. M. (2020). Surgical management of appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: is appendectomy sufficient? J. Surg. Oncol. 122 (6), 1173–1178. doi:10.1002/jso.26108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, B. R. M. (2019). Pseudomyxoma PeritoneiTreasure island(FL). StatPearlsPublishing 11 (5), 1–9. doi:10.14735/amko2019329

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, S. C., Wang, Q. Q., Long, X. J., Hu, Y. H., Li, J. Q., Xiang, X. L., et al. (2020). Multiple linear regression models with natural logarithmic transformations of variables. Zhonghua Yu Fang. Yi Xue Za Zhi 54 (4), 451–456. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20191030-00824

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, M., Liu, X., Zha, F., Liu, F., Zhou, J., Huang, M., et al. (2021). Stroke outcome assessment: optimizing cutoff scores for the Longshi scale, modified Rankin scale and Barthel index. PLoS One 16 (5), e0251103. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: pseudomyxoma peritonei, peritoneal cancer index, prediction, multiple linear regression, surgery

Citation: Bai M, Feng J, Liu J, Li Y, Xu Y, Ma F, Ma R, Liang G, Liu X and Zhao N (2024) Prediction of preoperative peritoneal cancer index for pseudomyxoma peritonei by multiple linear regression analysis. Front. Mol. Biosci. 11:1512937. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1512937

Received: 17 October 2024; Accepted: 26 November 2024;
Published: 23 December 2024.

Edited by:

Xi Yang, Affiliated Central Hospital Huzhou University, China

Reviewed by:

Wen-Jun Tu, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China
Radha Procopio, University of Magna Graecia, Italy

Copyright © 2024 Bai, Feng, Liu, Li, Xu, Ma, Ma, Liang, Liu and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Guowei Liang, bGlhbmdndW93ZWk3MjFAMTI2LmNvbQ==; Xuekai Liu, MTUxMDExMjk3ODBAMTYzLmNvbQ==; Na Zhao, emhhb25hNTc4N0AxNjMuY29t

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.