Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Microbiol., 11 November 2024
Sec. Microbial Symbioses
This article is part of the Research Topic Frontiers in Wolbachia Biology 2023 View all 15 articles

Editorial: Frontiers in Wolbachia biology 2023

  • 1Bioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan
  • 2Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
  • 3Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  • 4Koert School of Veterinary Medicine, Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
  • 5Department of Sustainable Agriculture, University of Patras, Agrinio, Greece
  • 6Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States
  • 7Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
  • 8Ecologie et Biologie des Interactions, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
  • 9Australia School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • 10Department of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom

Editorial on the Research Topic
Frontiers in Wolbachia biology 2023

Wolbachia is likely the most successful endosymbiotic bacteria associated with insects and other arthropods, as well as nematodes (Werren et al., 2008). Over the past several decades, its widespread presence across the vast range of arthropod in the terrestrial ecosystem, as well as its various biological attributes, have led to an explosive development in Wolbachia research. These include the induction of striking reproductive phenotypes, namely cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI), male-killing (MK), feminization (Fem) and parthenogenesis induction (PI) (Kaur et al., 2021); obligatory and conditional beneficial fitness consequences such as nutrient provisioning and resistance to parasites, pathogens and viruses (Hamilton and Perlman, 2013; Pimental et al., 2021); essentiality for host growth, development and survival (Zug and Hammerstein, 2015; Taylor et al., 2005); and others. The biology of Wolbachia is not only a captivating area of basic research that covers host-microbe interactions ranging from cell-biology and physiology to ecology and evolution (Serbus et al., 2008; Sanaei et al., 2021), but it is also an important applied research field that contributes to Wolbachia-mediated control of vector-borne infectious diseases and pests (Iturbe-Ormaetxe et al., 2011; Ross et al., 2019), and Wolbachia-targeted prevention and remedy of filariasis (Taylor et al., 2005; Johnson et al., 2021).

Since the 1st Wolbachia Conference held at Crete, Greece, in 2000, Wolbachia Conferences have biennially provided a very active and important forum for world's researchers working on Wolbachia and other microbial symbionts of arthropods, nematodes etc. The 11th Wolbachia Conference was initially planned to be held on 5th-10th July 2020, but because of the COVID pandemic, it was finally postponed to 11th-16th June 2023 and held so successfully. In collaboration with the 11th Wolbachia Conference, the Research Topic “Frontiers in Wolbachia Biology 2023” was launched to provide a forum to overview achievements recently emerging in this research field. In total, 12 original research articles and two review articles are compiled in the Research Topic, which cover a variety of topics regarding the Wolbachia biology.

The reproductive manipulations induced by Wolbachia infection are among the focal Research Topics of the Wolbachia biology. While several (putative) effector proteins responsible for CI, MK and PI phenotypes have been uncovered for several insect systems including fruit flies, mosquitoes, moths and wasps (Beckmann et al., 2017; LePage et al., 2017; Perlmutter et al., 2019; Katsuma et al., 2022; Arai et al., 2023; Fricke and Lindsay, 2024), considering the diversity of the effector molecules (Cifs, Oscar, Wmk, Pifs, etc.), more extensive survey is needed for understanding the diversity and commonality of the Wolbachia-induced reproductive phenotypes. Pramono et al. reported a CI-inducing Wolbachia genome from a leaf-mining pest fly Liriomyza trifolii. Grève et al. reported the genomes of three feminizing Wolbachia strains from the pill bug Armadillidium vulgare. Beckmann et al. attempted a modeling approach using an evolutionary algorithm as to how CI-inducing and rescuing proteins evolve. These studies provide basic information toward our better understanding of the biology of Wolbachia and its intricate reproductive phenotypes.

Wolbachia-mediated control measures against mosquito-borne diseases comprise the recent focal topic in this research field, which are mainly based on Wolbachia-mediated suppression of pathogen infections and CI-driven spread of Wolbachia infection into host populations (Iturbe-Ormaetxe et al., 2011; Ross et al., 2019). Tafesh-Edwards et al. investigated innate immune responses of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster after Zika virus infection. They found that some immune-related genes such as drosocin and puckered are upregulated in a female specific manner, whereas the activity of RNA interference and Toll signaling remain unaffected. Minwuyelet et al. reviewed previous studies on utilization of Wolbachia for reducing the transmission of mosquito-borne diseases. Guo et al. also overviewed the Wolbachia-mediated technologies for suppressing the transmission of mosquito-borne pathogens, and argued application of the technologies to control of rice pest planthoppers.

Wolbachia is difficult to culture ex vivo. Thus far, several Wolbachia culture systems have been developed, where the fastidious endosymbiotic bacteria can be maintained only when co-cultured with insect cell lines (Masson and Lemaitre, 2020). On the other hand, it was reported that Wolbachia purified from insect cells could be maintained in cell-free culture media for at least 1 week without loss of viability or infectivity (Rasgon et al., 2006). Here Behrmann et al. monitored the proliferation of a Wolbachia isolate from the mosquito Aedes albopictus in a host cell-free in vitro culture system by quantitative PCR. By supplementing a mosquito cell membrane fraction and fetal bovine serum, extracellular Wolbachia replication for up to 12 days was detected. Notably, even after the ex vivo maintenance for 12 days, the Wolbachia cells could establish infection to a fresh mosquito cell line, suggesting the possibility that Wolbachia might be amenable to some experimental or genetic manipulations using such cell-free culture systems.

Population dynamics of Wolbachia within host cells and tissues is important for understanding phenotypic consequences of the symbiont infection such as fitness effects, intensity of reproductive manipulation, level of reproductive performance, and others (López-Madrigal and Duarte, 2019). Sharmin et al. attempted to elucidate the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in regulation of intra-host Wolbachia titer by adopting chemical and genetic approaches using Drosophila fruit flies. In total, 37 chemical inhibitors targeting 14 host cellular/molecular processes, which were reported to affect intracellular bacterial abundance in previous studies, were administrated to D. melanogaster and D. simulans, and examined for their effects on Wolbachia titers. Finally, 5 compounds were identified to significantly increase the intra-host Wolbachia titers, which were associated with host Imd signaling, Calcium signaling, Ras/mTOR signaling, and Wnt signaling functions, suggesting that these host mechanisms may negatively regulate the Wolbachia titers. By making use of ample molecular genetic tools available for D. melanogaster, genetic disruption assays confirmed that disruption of Wnt and mTOR pathways upregulates the Wolbachia titers, uncovering that interactions of Wnt and mTOR pathways with autophagy may underlie the negative regulation over Wolbachia population. Poulain et al. reported detailed population dynamics of the Wolbachia strain wCle associated with the common bedbug Cimex lecturalius. In the bedbug, the Wolbachia cells densely and endocellularly populate the well-developed symbiotic organs, called the bacteriomes, where the specific Wolbachia strain synthesizes B vitamins that are deficient in host's blood meal (Hosokawa et al., 2010; Nikoh et al., 2014). In this context, the population dynamics data of wCle in the bedbug will provide insight into how the exceptional Wolbachia strain that turned into an obligatory nutritional mutualist contributes to survival and proliferation in the life cycle of the blood-sucking insect pest that is recently re-emerging worldwide (Doggett and Lee, 2023). Giordano et al. investigated reproductive performance of the soybean aphid Aphis glycines infected with or without the facultative symbionts Arsenophonus and/or Wolbachia under different aphid and soybean genotypes. These studies highlight how Wolbachia population is controlled and integrated into the endosymbiotic system in cellular, physiological and ecological contexts.

Since Wolbachia is indispensable for survival and reproduction of filarial nematodes, Wolbachia-targeting drugs are regarded as promising for medical prevention and remedy of filariasis (Johnson et al., 2021). Hegde et al. reported that an azaquinazoline anti-Wolbachia agent, AWZ1066S, facilitates the sterilizing and curing effects of benzimidazole in an experimental model of filariasis. Wangwiwatsin et al. reported in silico screening of co-evolving protein sequences between host filarial nematodes and their Wolbachia endosymbionts, which identified candidate “hub” genes that may connect multiple host-symbiont interactions and thus may provide potential drug targets via disruption of host-Wolbachia interactions.

For genomic and transcriptomic studies, the preparation of Wolbachia-derived DNA/RNA usually suffers heavy contamination of host-derived DNA/RNA due to the endosymbiotic nature of Wolbachia. Cantin, Dunning Hotopp et al. reported an improved procedure for metagenomic assembly of Wolbachia genome through selective enrichment of bacterial DNA from nematode host DNA using ATAC-seq technique. Cantin, Gregory et al. also reported an improved procedure for dual RNA-seq in filarial nematodes and Wolbachia endosymbionts using RNase H based ribosomal RNA depletion. These technical improvements may be useful for Wolbachia studies of not only nematodes but also insects and other arthropods.

In conclusion, the Research Topic provides a valuable overview of the recent research progress in the field of Wolbachia biology. We hope that this Research Topic shows future directions of this research field, which will be manifested in the forthcoming 12th Wolbachia Conference to be held at Okinawa, Japan, from 13th to 19th April 2025 (https://web.tuat.ac.jp/~insect/wolbachia2025/).

Author contributions

TF: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YG: Writing – review & editing. GT: Writing – review & editing. EM: Writing – review & editing. SP: Writing – review & editing. DB: Writing – review & editing. KJ: Writing – review & editing. MT: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. TF was funded by the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) ERATO grant no. JPMJER1902.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Arai, H., Anbutsu, H., Nishikawa, Y., Kogawa, M., Ishii, K., Hosokawa, M., et al. (2023). Combined actions of bacteriophage-encoded genes in Wolbachia-induced male lethality. iScience 26, 106842. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106842

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Beckmann, J. F., Ronau, J. A., and Hochstrasser, M. (2017). A Wolbachia deubiquitylating enzyme induces cytoplasmic incompatibility. Nat. Microbiol. 2:17007. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Doggett, S. L., and Lee, C. Y. (2023). Historical and contemporary control options against bed bugs, Cimex spp. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 68, 169–190. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120220-015010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fricke, L. C., and Lindsay, A. R. I. (2024). Identification of parthenogenesis-inducing effector proteins in Wolbachia. Genome Biol. Evol. 16:evae036. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evae036

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamilton, P. T., and Perlman, S. J. (2013). Host defense via symbiosis in Drosophila. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003808. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003808

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hosokawa, T., Koga, R., Kikuchi, Y., Meng, X.-Y., and Fukatsu, T. (2010). Wolbachia as a bacteriocyte-associated nutritional mutualist. PNAS 107, 769–774. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911476107

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Walker, T., and O' Neill, S. L. (2011). Wolbachia and the biological control of mosquito-borne disease. EMBO Rep. 12, 508–518. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.84

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Johnson, K. L., Hong, W. D., Turner, J. D., O'Neill, P. M., Ward, S. A., and Taylor, M. J. (2021). Anti-Wolbachia drugs for filariasis. Trends Parasitol. 37, 1068–1081. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2021.06.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Katsuma, S., Hirota, K., Matsuda-Imai, N., Fukui, T., Muro, T., Nishino, K., et al. (2022). A Wolbachia factor for male killing in lepidopteran insects. Nat. Commun. 13:6764. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34488-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaur, R., Shropshire, J. D., Cross, K. L., Leigh, B., Mansueto, A. J., Stewart, V., et al. (2021). Living in the endosymbiotic world of Wolbachia: a centennial review. Cell Host Microb. 29, 879–893. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.03.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

LePage, D. P., Metcalf, J. A., Bordenstein, S. R., On, J., Perlmutter, J. I., Shropshire, J. D., et al. (2017). Prophage WO genes recapitulate and enhance Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility. Nature 543, 243–247. doi: 10.1038/nature21391

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

López-Madrigal, S., and Duarte, E. H. (2019). Titer regulation in arthropod-Wolbachia symbioses. FEMS Microbiol. Let. 366:fnz232. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnz232

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Masson, F., and Lemaitre, B. (2020). Growing ungrowable bacteria: overview and perspectives on insect symbiont culturability. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 84, e00089–e00020. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00089-20

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nikoh, N., Hosokawa, T., Moriyama, M., Oshima, K., Hattori, M., and Fukatsu, T. (2014). Evolutionary origin of insect–Wolbachia nutritional mutualism. PNAS 111, 10257–10262. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409284111

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Perlmutter, J. I., Bordenstein, S. R., Unckless, R. L., LePage, D. P., Metcalf, J. A., Hill, T., et al. (2019). The phage gene wmk is a candidate for male killing by a bacterial endosymbiont. PLoS Pathog. 15:e1007936. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007936

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pimental, A. C., Cesar, C. S., Martins, M., and Cogni, R. (2021). The antiviral effects of the symbiont bacteria Wolbachia in insects. Front. Immunol. 11:626329. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.626329

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rasgon, J. L., Gamston, C. E., and Ren, X. (2006). Survival of Wolbachia pipientis in cell-free medium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 6934–6937. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01673-06

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ross, P. A., Turelli, M., and Hoffmann, A. A. (2019). Evolutionary ecology of Wolbachia releases for disease control. Annu. Rev. Genet. 53, 93–116. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043609

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanaei, E., Charlat, S., and Engelstädter, J. (2021). Wolbachia host shifts: routes, mechanisms, constraints and evolutionary consequences. Biol. Rev. 96, 433–453. doi: 10.1111/brv.12663

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Serbus, L. R., Casper-Lindley, C., Landmann, F., and Sullivan, W. (2008). The genetics and cell biology of Wolbachia-host interactions. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42, 683–707. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130354

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Taylor, M. J., Bandi, C., and Hoerauf, A. (2005). Wolbachia bacterial endosymbionts of filarial nematodes. Adv. Parasitol. 60, 245–284. doi: 10.1016/S0065-308X(05)60004-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Werren, J. H., Baldo, L., and Clark, M. E. (2008). Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 741–751. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1969

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zug, R., and Hammerstein, P. (2015). Bad guys turned nice? A critical assessment of Wolbachia mutualisms in arthropod hosts. Biol. Rev. 90, 89–111. doi: 10.1111/brv.12098

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Wolbachia, symbiont, genome, insect, nematode

Citation: Fukatsu T, Gottlieb Y, Tsiamis G, McGraw E, Perlman S, Bouchon D, Johnson K and Taylor MJ (2024) Editorial: Frontiers in Wolbachia biology 2023. Front. Microbiol. 15:1513314. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1513314

Received: 18 October 2024; Accepted: 21 October 2024;
Published: 11 November 2024.

Edited and reviewed by: Daisuke Kageyama, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Japan

Copyright © 2024 Fukatsu, Gottlieb, Tsiamis, McGraw, Perlman, Bouchon, Johnson and Taylor. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Takema Fukatsu, t-fukatsu@aist.go.jp

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.