Aditi Singh
Japareng Lalung
Irina Ivshina
Irena Kostova- 1Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, India
- 2School of Industrial Technology, University Sains Malaysia, George Town, Malaysia
- 3Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Perm, Russia
- 4Microbiology and Immunology Department, Perm State National Research University, Perm, Russia
- 5Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University-Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
Editorial on the Research Topic
Pharmaceutically active micropollutants – how serious is the problem and is there a microbial way out?
Pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) like antibiotics, drugs, and hormones are substances, extensively used in agriculture (Nguyen et al., 2023), medicine, and biotechnology (Deb et al., 2019). From 2015 to 2020, global medical dose consumption saw a substantial increase of ~24%, equivalent to 4.5 trillion additional doses (Narayanan et al., 2022). This surge reflects a growing reliance on medications, with significant contributions from populous countries such as India, China, Brazil, and Indonesia. In these regions, it is estimated that more than half of the world's population consumes, on average, over one dose of medicine per person each day (Narayanan et al., 2022). For instance, antibiotic consumption has increased globally in the past two decades (Langford and Morris, 2017; Kovalakova et al., 2020), a lot of which is attributed to improper use, leading to severe surge in antimicrobial resistance (Dadgostar, 2019; Tiseo et al., 2020; WHO, 2024). World Economic Forum in its 2021 report on antimicrobial resistance through water pollution has observed pharmaceutical and industrial waste as one of the four major sources of discharge in water bodies (World Economic Forum, 2021). According to one estimate, a significant portion which can range from 30 to 90% of orally consumed antibiotics are excreted in active form (OECD, 2019). This trend underscores the escalating demand for pharmaceuticals and highlights the importance of managing their environmental impact and ensuring sustainable healthcare practices.
Pharmaceutical production as well as consumption, both lead to discharge of these compounds in water bodies. The primary sources of PhACs in the environment are human and veterinary applications, with major pathways being excretion and discharge through sewage treatment plants (STPs). The presence of pharmaceutically active micropollutants like analgesics (Tyumina et al., 2020), hormones, antifungals (Camacho-Muñoz et al., 2010) along with significant amounts of antibiotics (Singh and Saluja, 2021; Ajibola et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2023; Barathe et al., 2024) being discharged into our environment has emerged as a pressing global concern. These contaminants, originating from various pharmaceutical products, are consistently detected in water bodies, posing risks to ecosystems and human health. Among the most ubiquitous PhACs are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as diclofenac and ibuprofen (Baratta et al., 2022; do Nascimento et al., 2023; Placova et al., 2023). These substances are widely used for their therapeutic effects but are not fully removed by conventional wastewater treatment processes, leading to their accumulation in aquatic environments (Rastogi et al., 2021; Swiacka et al., 2021; Blasco and Trombini, 2023). For instance, a study by dos Santos et al. (2021) highlighted significant concerns related to human health and environmental risks. Specifically, the synthetic estrogen 17α-ethinylestradiol was found to pose a high risk to human health, while the naturally occurring hormone 17β-estradiol presented a substantial environmental threat. These findings underscore the need for rigorous risk assessments to identify and mitigate the potential hazards posed by these and other chemical contaminants. Apart from groundwater, the contamination of PhACs is also reported in drinking water as well as treated wastewater (Fick et al., 2009; Chander et al., 2016; Kot-Wasik et al., 2016; Gu et al., 2018). In a pioneering systematic study by Bexfield et al. (2019), drinking water from 1,091 sites was analyzed for twenty-one hormones and a hundred and three pharmaceuticals. The study reported the presence of the hormone hydrocortisone, the plastic component bisphenol A, and three pharmaceuticals: carbamazepine, sulfamethoxazole, and meprobamate.
A number of studies have highlighted that the biodegradation of complex pharmaceutical compounds using bacteria, fungi, or their enzymes, is one of the prominent mechanisms for the removal of PhACs from wastewater and the environment (Chen et al., 2022; Habib et al., 2022; Ivshina et al., 2022; Waghmode et al., 2022; Kandasamy et al., 2024). However, in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), the removal of stable and low-concentration pharmaceutical compounds primarily relies on adsorption to sludge and biodegradation, whereas in water treatment plants (WTPs), chlorination and the use of activated granular carbon are the most effective methods for removing these compounds (Couto et al., 2019). Additionally, conventional WTPs can reduce but not completely eliminate pharmaceutical compounds from potable water (Couto et al., 2019; Kosek et al., 2020). Some of the gap areas in the efficient removal of pharmaceuticals from water in drinking water treatment plants are—(i) Neglect in design: when designing drinking water treatment plants, the removal of pharmaceuticals is often not prioritized or included as a standard treatment step. This omission is due to several factors, including the primary focus on traditional contaminants like pathogens, heavy metals, and organic pollutants; (ii) Technological and Financial Challenges: incorporating advanced treatment technologies specifically designed to remove pharmaceuticals, such as advanced oxidation processes, activated carbon filtration, or membrane technologies, can be both technologically complex and financially burdensome; (iii) Regulatory gaps: the absence of stringent regulations mandating the removal of pharmaceuticals from drinking water further exacerbates this issue. Without legal requirements, there is little incentive for water treatment facilities to invest in such technologies.
The Research Topic, titled “Pharmacologically active micropollutants – how serious is the problem and is there a microbial way out?”, brings to the fore the latest findings on the challenges posed by the many pharmacologically active compounds as pollutants for the environment. It highlights the severity of pollution caused by these compounds, often found in pharmaceuticals and their adverse effects on ecosystems and human health. The research also explores innovative microbial strategies for mitigating these pollutants, presenting microbial intervention as a promising solution to address and reduce the environmental impact of PhACs. This editorial synthesizes the key findings from five significant studies included in our Research Topic, each addressing different facets of this complex issue.
In their review, Tyumina, Subbotina et al. provides an extensive overview of the occurrence of ketoprofen, a widely used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, in aquatic and terrestrial environments between 2017 and 2023. Ketoprofen, known for its persistence and resistance to oxidative metabolism, has been detected in various regions and ecosystems, highlighting its widespread presence and the factors contributing to the entry of ketoprofen into aquatic ecosystems including pharmaceutical waste, improper disposal, and agricultural runoff. It poses significant ecotoxicity risks to vertebrates, invertebrates, plants, and microbes, emphasizing its detrimental impact on these organisms. The breakdown of ketoprofen by fungi, bacteria, and their enzymes as well as phytoremediation techniques and the use of algae to adsorb ketoprofen, are examined, of much significance among them are white rot fungi belonging to Trametes spp., Pleurotus spp., Phanerochaete spp., Irpex spp. Authors have previously reported Rhodococcus erythropolis, stress-tolerant actinomycetes for ketoprofen degradation (Bazhutin et al., 2022), and preparing a bacterial consortium with this rhodococci was assessed. Overall, the review covers several key points and offers a comprehensive assessment of the negative impacts and consequences of ketoprofen accumulation in ecosystems. It emphasizes the urgent need for developing and implementing effective microbiological remediation strategies to address contamination by such hazardous ecotoxicants.
The review paper by Amobonye et al. provides a comprehensive analysis of how various fungal species can metabolize and degrade PhACs. It is the filamentous fungi of three groups, viz. Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes, and Zygomycetes, have been most extensively studied, with white rot fungi of Basidiomycota being the most potential example for PhACs breakdown. The study focuses on several fungi, including Aspergillus luchuensis, Gymnopilus luteofolius, Irpex lacteus, Penicillium oxalicum, and Trametes versicolor which have demonstrated significant potential in breaking down pharmaceutical compounds such as diclofenac, carbamazepine, and ibuprofen. The potential of fungal enzymes in PhAC bioremediation is highlighted, the most explored of them being laccases, peroxidases, and monooxygenases, carrying out detoxification by reduction, oxidation, hydroxylation, dehydrogenation, deamination, dehalogenation, etc. The research elucidates the metabolic pathways employed by these fungi, which facilitate the breakdown of complex pharmaceutical molecules into less harmful byproducts. The mechanism of fungal bioreactors for PhAC degradation is also very comprehensively discussed, emphasizing the need for scalable and sustainable bioremediation solutions. The paper calls for further research into the optimization of fungal bioremediation processes, including the identification of the most effective fungal strains and the environmental conditions that maximize their biodegradative activity.
Gupta et al. in their review provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of pharmaceutically active micro-pollutants (PhAMPs) in natural environments. The review examines the factors influencing the pathways and prevalence of these contaminants, highlighting their environmental significance and providing a comprehensive analysis of various methods for removing them from water. The authors critically evaluate traditional water purification methods of physical separation (photolysis, nanofiltration), chemical transformation (reverse osmosis, UV decomposition), and biological methods (biodegradation by microbes), alongside emerging alternative techniques like combinatory treatments and integrative processes for addressing the rising threat of these pollutants. The authors highlight the advantages of using an integrative approach, combining methods such as microfiltration, ultrafiltration, and nanofiltration membranes, along with photo-oxidation using UV light and other advanced oxidation processes. Optimizing factors like membrane selection, reactor design, and operational parameters can enhance these methods' effectiveness. The review also underscores the necessity for detailed, comprehensive, and long-term studies on the health effects of PhAMPs present as water contaminants because such studies can be crucial for formulating regulations and legal standards governing the production and consumption of pharmaceutical products. To combat the escalating issue of pharmaceutical contamination, the review emphasizes the need for innovative therapeutic strategies, like phage therapy, the development of vaccines, and the use of substitutes for natural substances to minimize antibiotic overuse. The review underscores the importance of these new approaches in mitigating the environmental and health risks posed by pharmaceutical pollutants.
The study on phenotypic and metabolic adaptations of Rhodococcus cerastii strain IEGM 1243, a bacterium known for its resilience and metabolic versatility by Tyumina, Bazhutin et al., focuses on the adaptive responses of this strain when exposed to two pharmaceuticals. Taking reference to their previous studies on the potential of rhodococci to degrade NSAIDs, paracetamol, and ketoprofen (Ivshina et al., 2019, 2021; Bazhutin et al., 2022), the present study was done to explore the individual and combined effect of diclofenac and ibuprofen. The results were intriguing as R. cerastii exhibited moderate biodegradative activity, indicating its potential role in the bioremediation of NSAIDs. Notably, exposure to these drugs resulted in significant phenotypic and metabolic changes within the bacterial cells. For instance, the study observed increased cellular respiration and catalase activity, which are indicative of heightened metabolic processes aimed at neutralizing the toxic effects of the drugs. Morphometric and ultrastructural analysis of R. cerastii, when exposed to ibuprofen, showed the structural integrity of cells and the presence of lipid inclusions, polyphosphates, and intracellular membrane-like structures. These adaptations suggest a complex interaction between the bacteria and the pharmaceutical pollutants, highlighting the potential for utilizing such microbial systems in environmental cleanup efforts.
Microbial bioremediation is emerging as one of the most promising techniques for neutralizing and detoxifying pharmaceutically active micro-pollutants. The review article by Saeed et al. provides a comprehensive analysis of the impact of veterinary medicines on the environment, exploring the pathways through which veterinary drugs reach different niches, such as soil and water bodies. Entering through multiple routes, including runoff from agricultural lands, leaching into groundwater, discharge from animal farming facilities, improper disposal of waste, and excretion by treated animals, the paper highlights how these antibiotics, when released untreated into the environment, contribute to the problem of antimicrobial resistance. The review further discusses the traditional methods for eradicating veterinary medicinal effluents and their limitations, such as incomplete removal of contaminants, high costs, and potential secondary pollution. Authors, referring to their previous work (Singh et al., 2022; Singh and Kostova, 2024), have detailed the potential of bioremediation techniques to detoxify pharmaceutical pollutants, examining the mechanisms by which microbes break down veterinary drug compounds, highlighting microbial electrochemical technologies as eco-friendly solutions. The paper emphasizes the importance of optimizing microbial strains, improving bioreactor designs, and developing cost-effective solutions by integrating bioremediation with other treatment methods to achieve comprehensive environmental protection.
The increasing prevalence of pharmaceutically active micropollutants (PhACs) in the environment poses a significant threat to ecosystems and human health. A comprehensive global study by Wilkinson et al. analyzed over one thousand samples from 258 rivers across 137 geographic regions to detect 61 pharmaceutical compounds. The findings revealed that low- to middle-income countries are the most impacted due to inadequate wastewater and waste management infrastructure and pharmaceutical manufacturing practices. Among the compounds detected, carbamazepine, metformin, and caffeine were the most prevalent, found at more than half of the monitored sites (Wilkinson et al., 2022). This underscores the urgent need for improved waste management systems in these regions to mitigate the environmental and health risks posed by pharmaceutical contamination. Therefore, assessing the environmental risks of chemical compounds is crucial to protecting both aquatic and terrestrial biotic systems (Buta et al., 2021; Allel et al., 2023; Aladekoyi et al., 2024). The collection of research within this Research Topic “Pharmacologically active micropollutants – how serious is the problem and is there a microbial way out?”, of Frontiers in Microbiology highlights the urgency of addressing this issue and explores innovative microbial solutions. The five papers presented here collectively underscore the critical need for comprehensive strategies to mitigate the impact of PhACs and pave the way for sustainable remediation practices.
The integration of molecular approaches, such as genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, metagenomics, and transcriptomics, collectively referred to as the “Omics approach” has significantly improved our understanding of the metabolic pathways involved in the degradation of organic and inorganic substances during environmental bioremediation (Dangi et al., 2019). Microorganisms possess diverse and unique metabolic capabilities that allow them to assimilate complex molecules for energy, thanks to various processes and enzymes that act on a wide range of substrates. Advances in functional genomics have enabled the manipulation of genes and promoters to enhance these metabolic activities. Genetically engineered microorganisms are more efficient at bioremediation compared to naturally occurring microbes due to their enhanced capabilities in breaking down pollutants. Additionally, synthetic biology, which includes techniques like modifying organisms, creating minimal cells from scratch, designing new artificial functions in cells, and constructing genetic circuits, has further optimized the bioremediation process (Johri et al., 2023). These advancements have collectively made bioremediation more effective in addressing environmental pollution. However, it is equally important to do the ecological safety and risk assessment of the hereditarily and metabolically altered bacteria (Libis et al., 2016; Petsas and Vagi, 2019; Rafeeq et al., 2023).
Barcellos et al. (2022) in their systemic review covering more than 3,000 published documents from 1990 to 2020 on the management of pharmaceutical micropollutants and after analyzing various technical and governmental macro-to-micro approaches, have concluded that programs like drug take-back, and community sensitization on drug use reduction or proper disposal of discarded medicines, can be effective methods to better manage these pollutants and reduce environmental burden. They have given fifteen opportunities for developing countries which can be promising in bringing down PhACs pollution in urban waters. There should be strict norms for pharmaceutical compound use. Strict legal norms could help regulate and control the prescription and consumption of antibiotics, ensuring they are used only when necessary and in appropriate dosages; regulated use of antibiotics in agricultural and veterinary medicine, only for treating infections and not as growth promoters; following international standards and their strict compliance. To achieve these standards, there is a need for regular surveillance and robust monitoring programs for pharmaceutical residues in water bodies, soil, and food products to detect and quantify these contaminants at low concentrations. Advanced detection technologies utilizing advanced analytical techniques, such as mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography, can improve the accuracy and sensitivity of monitoring efforts and will be able to detect even trace amounts of pharmaceuticals. Systematic data collection and analysis help in understanding the sources, distribution, and fate of pharmaceutical contaminants. This information is critical for developing effective mitigation strategies and informing policy decisions. Lastly, ensuring transparency in monitoring results and raising public awareness about the potential risks of pharmaceuticals in the environment can drive community support for regulatory measures and encourage responsible pharmaceutical use and disposal practices. Thus, by addressing these points, we can work toward a more comprehensive and effective approach to managing pharmaceutical contaminants in the environment, protecting public health, and preserving ecosystems.
Author contributions
AS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JL: Data curation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing. II: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. IK: Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
The Editors of this Research Topic express their sincere thanks and gratitude for making this issue a reality. Thanks to everyone who has contributed excellent papers as well as to the constructive reviewers providing valuable referees' reports contributing to the quality of the accepted manuscripts. The constant help, support, and professionalism of the editorial staff of Frontiers in Microbiology during the entire process are greatly appreciated.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Ajibola, A. S., Awoyemi, T. E., Fasogbon, O. T., and Adewuyi, G. O. (2022). QuEChERS-based analysis and ecotoxicological risk of select antibiotics in dumpsite leachates, hospital wastewater and effluent receiving water in Ibadan, Nigeria. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 57, 709–722. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2022.2104064
Aladekoyi, O., Siddiqui, S., Hania, P., Hamza, R., and Gilbride, K. (2024). Accumulation of antibiotics in the environment: have appropriate measures been taken to protect Canadian human and ecological health? Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 280:116513. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116513
Allel, K., Day, L., Hamilton, A., Lin, L., Furuya-Kanamori, L., Moore, C. E., et al. (2023). Global antimicrobial-resistance drivers: an ecological country-level study at the human–animal interface. Lancet Planet. Health 7, e291–e303. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00026-8
Barathe, P., Kaur, K., Reddy, S., Shriram, V., and Kumar, V. (2024). Antibiotic pollution and associated antimicrobial resistance in the environment. J. Hazard. Mater. Lett. 5:100105. doi: 10.1016/j.hazl.2024.100105
Baratta, M., Tursi, A., Curcio, M., Cirillo, G., Nezhdanov, A. V., Mashin, A. I., et al. (2022). Removal of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs from drinking water sources by GO-SWCNT buckypapers. Molecules 27:7674. doi: 10.3390/molecules27227674
Barcellos, D. S., Procopiuck, M., and Bollmann, H. A. (2022). Management of pharmaceutical micropollutants discharged in urban waters: 30 years of systematic review looking at opportunities for developing countries. Sci. Total Environ. 809:151128. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151128
Bazhutin, G. A., Polygalov, M. A., Tyumina, E. A., Tyan, S. M., and Ivshina, I. B. (2022). “Cometabolic bioconversion of ketoprofen by Rhodococcus erythropolis IEGM 746” in Science and Global Challenges of the 21st-Century Science and Technology, eds. A. Rocha, and E. Isaeva (Cham: Springer), 404–410.
Bexfield, L. M., Toccalino, P. L., Belitz, K., Foreman, W. T., and Furlong, E. T. (2019). Hormones and pharmaceuticals in groundwater used as a source of drinking water across the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 2950–2960. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05592
Blasco, J., and Trombini, C. (2023). Ibuprofen and diclofenac in the marine environment - a critical review of their occurrence and potential risk for invertebrate species. Water Emerg. Contam. Nanoplast. 2:14. doi: 10.20517/wecn.2023.06
Buta, M., Hubeny, J., Zieliński, W., Harnisz, M., and Korzeniewska, E. (2021). Sewage sludge in agriculture – the effects of selected chemical pollutants and emerging genetic resistance determinants on the quality of soil and crops – a review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 214:112070. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112070
Camacho-Muñoz, M. D., Santos, J. L., Aparicio, I., and Alonso, E. (2010). Presence of pharmaceutically active compounds in Doñana Park (Spain) main watersheds. J. Hazard. Mater. 177, 1159–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.030
Chander, V., Sharma, B., Negi, V., Aswal, R. S., Singh, P., Singh, R., et al. (2016). Pharmaceutical compounds in drinking water. J. Xenobiot. 6:5774. doi: 10.4081/xeno.2016.5774
Chen, R., Liu, X., and Ma, Y. (2022). Isolation and identification of acetaminophen degrading strain Shinella sp. HZA2. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B, 57, 333–338. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2022.2054247
Couto, C. F., Lange, L. C., and Amaral, M. C. S. (2019). Occurrence, fate and removal of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) in water and wastewater treatment plants—A review. J. Water Process Eng. 32:100927. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100927
Dadgostar, P. (2019). Antimicrobial resistance: implications and costs. Infect. Drug Resist. 12, 3903–3910. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S234610
Dangi, A. K., Sharma, B., Hill, R. T., and Shukla, P. (2019). Bioremediation through microbes: systems biology and metabolic engineering approach. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 39, 79–98. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2018.1500997
Deb, P. K., Al-Attraqchi, O. H. A., Stanslas, J., Al-Aboudi, A., Al-Attraqchi, N., and Tekade, R. K. (2019). “Biotechnology-based pharmaceutical products,” in Biomaterials and Bionanotechnology, ed. R. K. Tekade (Academic Press), 153–189.
do Nascimento, R. F., de Carvalho Filho, J. A. A., Napoleão, D. C., Ribeiro, B. G., da Silva Pereira Cabral, J. J., and de Paiva, A. L. R. (2023). Presence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatories in Brazilian semiarid waters. Water Air Soil Pollut. 234:225. doi: 10.1007/s11270-023-06239-2
dos Santos, C. R., Arcanjo, G. S., de Souza Santos, L. V., Koch, K., and Amaral, M. C. S. (2021). Aquatic concentration and risk assessment of pharmaceutically active compounds in the environment. Environ. Pollut. 290:118049. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118049
Fick, J., Söderström, H., Lindberg, R. H., Phan, C., Tysklind, M., and Larsson, D. G. J. (2009). Contamination of surface, ground, and drinking water from pharmaceutical production. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 28, 2522–2527. doi: 10.1897/09-073.1
Gu, Y., Huang, J., Zeng, G., Shi, L., Shi, Y., and Yi, K. (2018). Fate of pharmaceuticals during membrane bioreactor treatment: status and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 268, 733–748. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.029
Habib, M. L., Hasan, M. M., Biswas, S., Hossain Mohd, T., Anwaruzzaman, M., and Kamruzzaman, M. (2022). “Removal of organic micro-pollutants by aerobic and anaerobic microorganism,” in Biodegradation and Detoxification of Micropollutants in Industrial Wastewater, eds. I. Haq, A. S. Kalamdhad, and M. P. Shah (Elsevier), 55–78.
Ivshina, I., Bazhutin, G., and Tyumina, E. (2022). Rhodococcus strains as a good biotool for neutralizing pharmaceutical pollutants and obtaining therapeutically valuable products: through the past into the future. Front. Microbiol. 13:967127. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.967127
Ivshina, I. B., Tyumina, E. A., Bazhutin, G. A., and Vikhareva, E. V. (2021). Response of Rhodococcus cerastii IEGM 1278 to toxic effect of ibuprofen. PLoS ONE 16:e0260032, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260032
Ivshina, I. B., Tyumina, E. A., Kuzmina, M. V., and Vikhareva, E. V. (2019). Features of diclofenac biodegradation by Rhodococcus ruber IEGM 346. Sci. Rep. 9:9159. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45732-9
Johri, P., Singh, A., Trivedi, M., and Singh, S. (2023). “Integration of pathway analysis as a powerful tool for microbial remediation of pollutants,” in Genomics Approach to Bioremediation, eds. V. Kumar, M. Bilal, L. F. R. Ferreira, and H. M. N. Iqbal (New Jersey, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.), 397–415.
Kandasamy, S., Babu, S. A., Dwaraka, S. J. B., Naveenkumar, M., Nandakumar, N. P., and Subbiah, K. (2024). “Avenues and opportunities of detoxification of micropollutants from industrial effluent using advanced biological treatment techniques,” in Emerging Innovative Trends in the Application of Biological Processes for Industrial Wastewater Treatment, ed. M. P. Shah (Elsevier), 27–41.
Kosek, K., Luczkiewicz, A., Fudala-Ksiażek, S., Jankowska, K., Szopińska, M., Svahn, O., et al. (2020). Implementation of advanced micropollutants removal technologies in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) - examples and challenges based on selected EU countries. Environ. Sci. Policy 112, 213–226. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.011
Kot-Wasik, A., Jakimska, A., and Sliwka-Kaszyńska, M. (2016). Occurrence and seasonal variations of 25 pharmaceutical residues in wastewater and drinking water treatment plants. Environ. Monit. Assess. 188:661. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5637-0
Kovalakova, P., Cizmas, L., McDonald, T. J., Marsalek, B., Feng, M., and Sharma, V. K. (2020). Occurrence and toxicity of antibiotics in the aquatic environment: a review. Chemosphere 251:126351. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126351
Langford, B. J., and Morris, A. M. (2017). Is it time to stop counselling patients to “finish the course of antibiotics”? Can. Pharm. J. 150, 349–350. doi: 10.1177/1715163517735549
Libis, V., Delépine, B., and Faulon, J. L. (2016). Expanding biosensing abilities through computer-aided design of metabolic pathways. ACS Synth. Biol. 5, 1076–1085. doi: 10.1021/ACSSYNBIO.5B00225
Narayanan, M., El-sheekh, M., Ma, Y., Pugazhendhi, A., Natarajan, D., Kandasamy, G., et al. (2022). Current status of microbes involved in the degradation of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) pollutants in the aquatic ecosystem. Environ. Pollut. 300:118922. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118922
Nguyen, M.-K., Lin, C., Nguyen, H.-L., Hung, N. T. Q., La, D. D., Nguyen, X. H., et al. (2023). Occurrence, fate, and potential risk of pharmaceutical pollutants in agriculture: challenges and environmentally friendly solutions. Sci. Total Environ. 899:165323. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165323
OECD (2019). Pharmaceutical Residues in Freshwater: Hazards and Policy Responses, OECD Studies on Water. Paris: OECDPublishing.
Petsas, A. S., and Vagi, M. C. (2019). Trends in the bioremediation of pharmaceuticals and other organic contaminants using native or genetically modified microbial strains: a review. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 20, 787–824. doi: 10.2174/1389201020666190527113903
Placova, K., Halfar, J., Brozova, K., and Heviankova, S. (2023). “Issues of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in aquatic environments: a review study,” in The 4th International Conference on Advances in Environmental Engineering (Ostrava), 13.
Rafeeq, H., Afsheen, N., Rafique, S., Arshad, A., Intisar, M., Hussain, A., et al. (2023). Genetically engineered microorganisms for environmental remediation. Chemosphere 310:136751. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136751
Rastogi, A., Tiwari, M. K., and Ghangrekar, M. M. (2021). A review on environmental occurrence, toxicity and microbial degradation of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs). J. Environ. Manage. 300:113694. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113694
Singh, A., Dwivedi, M., Yadav, H., and Garima (2022). “Potential of microbes for degradation of xenobiotics: with special focus on petroleum hydrocarbons,” in Relationship Between Microbes and the Environment for Sustainable Ecosystem Services, Vol. 2, eds. J. Samuel, A. Kumar, and J. Singh (Elsevier), 95–118.
Singh, A., and Kostova, I. (2024). Health effects of heavy metal contaminants Vis-à-Vis microbial response in their bioremediation. Inorg. Chim. Acta 568:122068. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2024.122068
Singh, A., and Saluja, S. (2021). “Microbial degradation of antibiotics from effluentsm” in Environmental and Microbial Biotechnology, eds. Inamuddin, M. I. Ahamed, and R. Prasad (Singapore: Springer), 389–404.
Swiacka, K., Michnowska, A., Maculewicz, J., Caban, M., and Smolarz, K. (2021). Toxic effects of NSAIDs in non-target species: a review from the perspective of the aquatic environment. Environ. Pollut. 273:115891. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115891
Tiseo, K., Huber, L., Gilbert, M., Robinson, T. P., and van Boeckel, T. P. (2020). Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals from 2017 to 2030. Antibiotics 9:918. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9120918
Tyumina, E. A., Bazhutin, G. A., Cartagena Gómez, A., and Ivshina, I. B. (2020). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as emerging contaminants. Microbiology 89, 148–163. doi: 10.1134/S0026261720020125
Waghmode, M. S., Patil, N. N., and Bankar, A. V. (2022). Microbial cell factories for the management of pharmaceutical micropollutants. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 49:2676. doi: 10.55863/ijees.2023.2676
WHO (2024). 2023 Antibacterial Agents in Clinical and Preclinical Development: An Overview and Analysis. World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240094000 (accessed July 27, 2024).
Wilkinson, J. L., Boxall, A. B. A., Kolpin, D. W., Leung, K. M. Y., Lai, R. W. S., Galbán-Malagón, C., et al. (2022). Pharmaceutical pollution of the world's rivers. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119:e2113947119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113947119
World Economic Forum (2021). Antimicrobial Resistance and Water: The risks and costs for economies and societies. Briefing Paper. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Antimicrobial_Resistance_and_Water_2021.pdf (accessed July 27, 2024).
Xu, L. S., Wang, W. Z., Deng, J. B., and Xu, W. H. (2023). The residue of tetracycline antibiotics in soil and Brassica juncea var. gemmifera, and the diversity of soil bacterial community under different livestock manure treatments. Environ. Geochem. Health 45, 7–17. doi: 10.1007/s10653-022-01213-z
Keywords: pharmacologically active compounds, PhACs, drug pollution, environmental pollution, bioremediation
Citation: Singh A, Lalung J, Ivshina I and Kostova I (2024) Editorial: Pharmaceutically active micropollutants – how serious is the problem and is there a microbial way out? Front. Microbiol. 15:1466334. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1466334
Received: 17 July 2024; Accepted: 20 August 2024;
Published: 30 August 2024.
Edited and reviewed by: Eric Altermann, Massey University, New Zealand
Copyright © 2024 Singh, Lalung, Ivshina and Kostova. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Aditi Singh, YXNpbmdoMyYjeDAwMDQwO2xrby5hbWl0eS5lZHU=; c2luZ2guYWRpdGkwMCYjeDAwMDQwO2dtYWlsLmNvbQ==; Japareng Lalung, amFwYXJlbmcmI3gwMDA0MDt1c20ubXk=; Irina Ivshina, aXZzaGluYSYjeDAwMDQwO2llZ20ucnU=; Irena Kostova, aXJlbmFrb3N0b3ZhJiN4MDAwNDA7eWFob28uY29t