Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 06 February 2024
Sec. Virology
This article is part of the Research Topic Viral Interactions with the Nucleus, Volume II View all 6 articles

DEAD-box RNA helicase 21 interacts with porcine circovirus type 2 Cap protein and facilitates viral replication

\r\nJianwei Zhou,*Jianwei Zhou1,2*Jie Zhao,Jie Zhao1,2Haoyu Sun,Haoyu Sun1,2Beining Dai,Beining Dai1,2Ning Zhu,Ning Zhu1,2Qianhong Dai,Qianhong Dai1,2Yonghui Qiu,Yonghui Qiu1,2Dedong Wang,Dedong Wang1,2Yongqiu Cui,Yongqiu Cui1,2Jinshuo Guo,Jinshuo Guo1,2Xufei Feng,Xufei Feng1,2Lei Hou,Lei Hou1,2Jue Liu,*Jue Liu1,2*
  • 1College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
  • 2Jiangsu Co-innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) is the etiological agent of PCV2-associated diseases that pose a serious threat to the swine industry. PCV2 capsid (Cap) protein has been shown to interact with DEAD-box RNA helicase 21 (DDX21), an important protein that regulates RNA virus replication. However, whether the interaction between DDX21 and the PCV2 Cap regulates PCV2 replication remains unclear. Herein, by using western blotting, interaction assays, and knockdown analysis, we found that PCV2 infection induced the cytoplasmic relocation of DDX21 from the nucleolus in cultured PK-15 cells. Moreover, the nuclear localization signal (NLS) of PCV2 Cap interacted directly with DDX21. The NLS of PCV2 Cap and 763GSRSNRFQNK772 residues at the C-terminal domain (CTD) of DDX21 were essential for the dual interaction. Upon shRNA-mediated DDX21 depletion in PK-15 cells, we observed impaired PCV2 replication via a lentivirus-delivered system, as evidenced by decreased levels of viral protein expression and virus production. In contrast, the replication of PCV2 increased in transiently DDX21-overexpressing cells. Our results indicate that DDX21 interacts with PCV2 Cap and plays a crucial role in virus replication. These results provide a reference for developing novel potential targets for prevention and control of PCV2 infection.

Introduction

The circular replication-associated protein (Rep)-encoding single stranded (CRESS) DNA virus emergence in diverse host has been associated with severe disease (Zhao et al., 2019). The CRESS DNA viruses have seven family members: Circoviridae, Nanoviridae, Smacoviridae, Genomoviridae, Bacilladnaviridae, Geminiviridae, and Redondoviridae, established by the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) (Zhao et al., 2019; Abbas et al., 2021). Porcine circovirus (PCV) belongs to the genus Circovirus, family Circoviridae. The genus Circovirus has been discovered in different animal species, including pigs, ducks, dogs, minks, rats, palm civets, geese, pigeons, canaries, and parrots (Schoemaker et al., 2000; Phenix et al., 2001; Todd et al., 2001; Lorincz et al., 2011; Nauwynck et al., 2012; Li et al., 2013; Lian et al., 2014). PCV is a non-enveloped, circular, single-stranded DNA virus with a 1.7–2.0-kb genome (Breitbart et al., 2017). PCV is the smallest known virus capable of autonomous replication in mammalian cells and is classified into four genotypes: PCV1, PCV2, PCV3, and PCV4 (Tischer et al., 1982; Allan et al., 1998; Palinski et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2020). PCV2 is the major etiological agent of porcine circovirus-associated diseases (PCVAD), and porcine circovirus-like virus is also associated with PCVAD (Liu et al., 2021). Six PCV2-encoded viral proteins have been identified over the past decades (Mankertz et al., 1998; Nawagitgul et al., 2000; He et al., 2013; Lv et al., 2015; Li et al., 2018). The capsid protein acts as the major packaging protein of the PCV genome, regulating genome replication by binding to the Rep protein. The PCV Cap is also a major host-protective immunogen and essential for viral replication (Finsterbusch et al., 2009; Wiederkehr et al., 2009). Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the functions of Cap can provide insights into the viral replication cycle and knowledge of therapeutic and prophylactic interventions for infections with PCV2.

The replication of circovirus is assumed to occur though a rolling circle replication (RCR) mechanism. Circovirus does not encode DNA polymerase, and hence, the host cellular replication machinery is required for de novo DNA synthesis (Heath et al., 2006). As for all PCVs, the conserved N-terminus of Cap protein comprise a nuclear localization signal (NLS) (Zhou et al., 2021a,b). The amino acid sequences of PCV2 Cap are extremely different from those of PCV1, PCV3, or PCV4 Cap, but their motifs are highly similar within the NLSs in spite of different PCV genotypes (Zhou et al., 2021a,2022a). The NLSs are critical elements of virus-encoding proteins (Matthews, 2001; Wurm et al., 2001). Some virus-encoding proteins are considered important in virus transcription and translation, cell cycle, and division (Salvetti and Greco, 2014). Other NLS-comprising proteins target the nucleus to change cell morphology (Hiscox, 2002). Thus, mapping the host cellular proteins binding to PCV2 Cap comprising an NLS will help understand the replication of PCV2 infection.

PCV2 Cap interacted with DEAD-box RNA helicase 21 (DDX21) in a proteomic study (Zhou et al., 2020, 2022a). DDX21 is considered as a plenteous nucleolar protein that connects with ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) to facilitate RNA metabolism (Valdez et al., 1996; Calo et al., 2015). DDX21 comprises a helicase domain that bears the DEXD sequence along with the flanking N-terminal and C-terminal domains and is proposed to interact with multiple cellular proteins (Fuller-Pace, 2006; Ali, 2021). It has been found to regulate RNA virus replication. For example, DDX21 inhibits the replication of influenza A virus by decreasing polymerase activity and reducing virus replication via interaction with PB1 protein (Chen et al., 2014). Dengue virus infection caused the cytoplasmic redistribution of DDX21 to suppress viral replication (Dong et al., 2016). Similarly, DDX21 regulates the replication of Borna disease virus by modulating mRNA translation (Watanabe et al., 2009). In addition, it acts as a cellular restriction factor of FMDV IRES-dependent translation and replication (Abdullah et al., 2021).

In addition, DDX21 also regulates host cellular innate immune responses to viruses (Bonaventure and Goujon, 2022; Ullah et al., 2022). For example, DDX1, DDX21, and DHX36 regulate host innate immune responses (Li et al., 2022a). Besides, cleavage of DDX21 suppresses host immune responses (Wu et al., 2021). Nevertheless, all studies on the roles of DDX21 in viral replication has only been investigated on RNA viruses, and the study on contribution of DDX21 to DNA virus replication was explored once (Hao et al., 2019). Therefore, it is essential to demonstrate whether binding of DDX21 to Cap regulates the life cycle of PCV2.

In the present study, our results demonstrate that DDX21 is transported from the nucleolus to the cytoplasm during PCV2 infection. The NLS of the PCV2 Cap and 763GSRSNRFQNK772 residues at the CTD of DDX21 are essential for the dual interaction. In addition, DDX21 expression promotes PCV2 replication. These results show that DDX21 interacts directly with the PCV2 Cap NLS and the interaction is critical for PCV2 replication.

Results

Redistribution of DDX21 is induced by PCV2 infection

To demonstrate whether PCV2 infection would induce the subcellular distribution of DDX10, we determined the distribution of DDX21 by confocal microscopy. PK-15 cells were infected with PCV2 at a MOI of 1.0 and fixed at 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection (hpi). The subcellular co-localization of Cap with DDX21 was detected in the nucleus at 24 hpi, and DDX21 was predominantly detected in the nucleolus of mock-infected cells (Figures 1A, B). Likewise, the distribution of DDX21 was changed at 48 hpi, and part of DDX21 redistributed to the nucleoplasm from the nucleolus. The nuclear overlapping of Cap and DDX21 disappeared at 72 hpi, and they were resided in the cytoplasm (Figures 1A, B). In addition, the original and enlarged images of the subcellular distribution of Cap and DDX21 at 72 hpi were showed in Supplementary Figure 1. The nuclear and cytoplasmic fractionation assays were performed to further demonstrate PCV2 infection-induced redistribution. The nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were isolated at 48 and 72 hpi. The DDX21 was gradually resided in the cytoplasm during PCV2 infection (Figures 1C, D). The results indicate that DDX21 redistributes to the cytoplasm during PCV2 infection.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. DDX21 relocates from the nucleolus to the cytoplasm induced by PCV2 infection. (A) Immunofluorescence analysis of the subcellular localization of DDX21 during PCV2 infection. PK-15 cells were infected with PCV2 at a MOI of 1.0 for 24, 48, 72 h post-infection (hpi). Cells were fixed and stained with mouse mAb against Cap, rabbit anti-DDX21 antibody, FITC-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG, and Alexa Fluor 546-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG. PK-15 cells were observed under a confocal microscope (Supplementary Figure 1). Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bar, 10 μm. (B) The proportion of co-localization of PCV2 Cap and DDX21 proteins was analyzed using ImageJ software at 24, 48, and 72 hpi. (C) The nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were extracted after PK-15 cells infected with PCV2 at a MOI of 1.0. At 48 and 72 hpi, the protein samples were prepared and analyzed by western blotting using antibodies against PCV2 Cap and DDX21. Histone H3 and β-tubulin served as fractionation quality controls. (D) The DDX21 protein band intensity was analyzed using ImageJ software at 48, 72 hpi. Data are presented as means ± SD of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05.

DDX21 interacts directly with PCV2 Cap

To investigate the relationship between PCV2 infection-induced DDX21 redistribution, lysates from the PCV2-infected or Cap-transfected PK-15 cells were immunoprecipitated using anti-Cap mAbs or FLAG beads. The results showed that the DDX21 protein interacted with PCV2 Cap (Figures 2A, B). However, viral protein Rep did not interact with DDX21 (Supplementary Figure 2). To investigate the interaction between DDX21 and Cap, HEK293T cells were co-transfected with FLAG-DDX21 and Myc-Cap and used FLAG beads or purified anti-Myc monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for co-immunoprecipitation. The results revealed that DDX21 interacted with the Cap protein (Figures 2C, D). Additionally, glutathione-S-transferase (GST) pull-down assays were performed to investigate whether DDX21 interacts directly with the Cap protein. His-Sumo-Cap and GST or GST-DDX21 were conducted to GST pull-down experiments. The results showed that GST-DDX21 protein interacted with His-Sumo-Cap (Figure 2E). Collectively, these results demonstrate that DDX21 interacts directly with the PCV2 Cap protein.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Cap interacts directly with DDX21. (A) Immunoprecipitation analysis. PK-15 cells were infected with PCV2 at a MOI of 1.0 for 48 h and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with purified anti-Cap IgG mAb, followed by immunoblotting with anti-Cap, anti-DDX21, and anti-β-actin antibodies. Besides, the PCV2-infected PK-15 cell lysates were further immunoprecipitated with purified anti-Rep IgG mAb, followed by immunoblotting with anti-Rep, anti-DDX21, and anti-β-actin antibodies (Supplementary Figure 2). (B) PK-15 cells were transfected with an empty vector and FLAG-Cap for 48 h. (C,D) Co-immunoprecipitation analysis. HEK293T cells were co-transfected with Myc-Cap and FLAG-DDX21 for 48 h, and then the cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with Flag beads (B,C) or anti-Myc-purified IgG (D). (E) GST pull-down assays. GST or GST-DDX21 proteins were immobilized on GST beads and incubated with His-sumo-Cap. GST or GST-DDX21 proteins in the GST pull-down assays were examined using immunoblotting with anti-His, and anti-GST antibodies, respectively. GST, glutathione-S-transferase.

NLS of PCV2 Cap is crucial for interaction with DDX21

To identify the amino acid residues within PCV2 Cap necessary for interaction with DDX21, we transfected the indicated plasmids into HEK293T cells. The results demonstrated that amino acids (aa) of Cap-WT, and Cap-M2 could interact with DDX21, but Cap-M1 did not bind to DDX21 (Figures 3A–C). The results indicate that PCV2 Cap NLS is crucial for binding to DDX21. In addition, Co-IP assays further showed that the NLSs within Cap of all PCVs and circoviruses from other animal species were essential for DDX21 binding as well (Figures 3D, E), which were similar to the previous results (Zhou et al., 2022a), suggesting that Cap binding to DDX21 is very conserved.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Binding domain identification of Cap with DDX21. HEK293T cells were co-transfected with plasmids containing full-length PCV2 Cap or truncated mutants fused with a GFP-, or FLAG-GST tag, along with FLAG-DDX21 plasmid for 48 h; the cell lysate extracts were immunoprecipitated with Flag beads (A) or anti-GFP purified IgG (B), or pulled-down with glutathione S-transferase (GST) beads (C) and then detected by western blotting using the indicated antibodies. (D,E) The nuclear localization signals (NLSs) within capsid protein of porcine circovirus type 1, 2, 3, 4 and circoviruses from other species were responsible for binding to DDX21. HEK293T cells were cotransfected with plasmids encoding NLSs of PCV1, 2, 3, 4 (D) and circoviruses from terrestrial, aquatic and avian species, including pigs, canaries, canines, minks, dragonflies, pigeons, ducks, bats, geese, and parrots (E), along with FLAG-DDX21; cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies.

763GSRSNRFQNK772 of DDX21 is required for binding to PCV2 Cap

DDX21 comprises an NTD, a conserved helicase domain, and a variable CTD (Fuller-Pace, 2006; Ali, 2021). To identify the amino acid residues essential for DDX21 interaction with PCV2 Cap, we transfected plasmids DDX21-(1-784aa), DDX21-M1-(1-217aa), DDX21-M2-(218-581aa), DDX21-M3-(582-784aa), DDX21-M4-(1-581aa), DDX21-M5-(218-784aa), and DDX21-M6-(1-217aa + 582-784aa) with FLAG-Cap or FLAG-gst-Cap. The results showed that DDX21-WT, DDX21-M3, DDX21-M5, and DDX21-M6 interacted with PCV2 Cap, but DDX21-M1, DDX21-M2, and DDX21-M4 were not able to interact with PCV2 Cap (Figures 4A–D), showing that DDX21-CTD is important for binding to PCV2 Cap.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. 763GSRSNRFQNK772 of DDX21 is crucial for binding to Cap. (A) Schematic representation of the NTD, Helicase D, and CTD of DDX21 and their truncation mutants used in this study. (B–D) The DDX21-CTD-(582-784aa) interacted with Cap. HEK293T cells were co-transfected with expression plasmids GFP-DDX21-WT or its serial GFP-DDX21 truncated mutants M1 to M6, together with FLAG-Cap or FLAG-GST-Cap plasmid. The cell lysate extracts were immunoprecipitated or GST pulled-down followed by western blotting using the indicated antibodies. (E,F) Identification the critical amino acids of DDX21-CTD essential for interaction with Cap. HEK293T cells were co-transfected with DDX21-WT or DDX21 truncated mutants M3, M7 to M9, along with FLAG-Cap plasmid, and the cell lysate extracts were immunoprecipitated followed by western blotting using the indicated antibodies.

To identify the amino acids required for interaction with PCV2 Cap within the DDX21-CTD, the online tools were utilized. An unidentified NLS (763GSRSNRFQNK772) was predicted within the DDX21-CTD. Thus, we co-transfected DDX21-M7-(582-772aa), DDX21-M8-(582-762aa), DDX21-M9-(763-772aa) with FLAG-Cap and subjected them to reciprocal Co-IP assays. The results showed that DDX21-WT, DDX21-M3, DDX21-M7, and DDX21-M9 interacted with FLAG-Cap. However, DDX21-M8 was not able to bind to PCV2 Cap (Figures 4E, F). To sum up, the results demonstrate that 763GSRSNRFQNK772 of DDX21 is important for binding to PCV2 Cap.

DDX21 is required for viral progeny production during PCV2 replication

To assess the physiological role of DDX21 during PCV2 infection, a short hairpin RNA targeting for DDX21 and a non-targeted shRNA were delivered to produce cells expressing GFP shRNAs. The DDX21-silenced cells were infected with PCV2, and the PCV2 viral proteins Cap and Rep were measured. The PCV2 Cap and Rep protein expression levels were reduced in the DDX21-silenced cells compared with those in the shCON (empty vector) controls (Figure 5A). Furthermore, the replicative ability of PCV2 in the DDX21-silenced cells was approximately 10-fold lower than that of control cells during infection (p < 0.05; Figure 5B). These results suggest that PCV2 replication is reduced in DDX21-silenced cells.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. DDX21 promotes the replication of PCV2. (A,C) Immunoblotting of the proteins Cap, Rep, DDX21, FLAG, and β-actin in DDX21-silenced or DDX21-overexpressing PK-15 cells. The cells were infected with PCV2 at a MOI of 1.0, and shCON-transfected or empty vector-transfected cells served as negative controls. (B,D) TCID50 values of PCV2 in samples from (A,C). Viral stocks were harvested at 48, 60, 72 hpi. Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent biological experiments. ns, not significant; *p < 0.05.

As DDX21 silencing inhibited PCV2 replication, we aimed to determine whether DDX21 overexpression can promote PCV2 replication. PCV2 Cap and Rep expression levels were increased in cells overexpressing DDX21 compared with those in the empty vector controls (Figure 5C). Similarly, PCV2 replication was significantly increased in cells overexpressing DDX21 as well, inferring that DDX21 overexpression promotes PCV2 replication (Figure 5D). In summary, the results indicate that DDX21 expression facilitates PCV2 replication.

Discussion

In a silent state, DDX21 is located in the nucleolus (Hirai et al., 2013). The subcellular distribution of DDX21 into nucleolus is required for the RNA unwinding (Song et al., 2017). DDX21 regulates viral replication through many ways, including inhibiting viral genome replication and prohibiting virus replication (Watanabe et al., 2009; Abdullah et al., 2021; Li et al., 2022b; Zhao et al., 2022). DDX21 interacts with rRNAs and snoRNAs to facilitate transcription and processing (Flores-Rozas and Hurwitz, 1993). In addition, DDX21 unwinds RNA guanine quadruplexes (Mcrae et al., 2018). Further, DDX21 regulates innate immunity as well. For example, DDX21, DDX1 and DHX36, bind to TRIF to recognize dsRNA (Zhang et al., 2011). DDX21 redistributes from the nucleus to the cytoplasm for inducing innate immune responses during dengue virus infection (Dong et al., 2016). Moreover, DDX21 facilitates redistribution to the cytoplasm to reduce IFN-β production through disrupting the DDX1-DDX21-DHX36 complex during infection (Li et al., 2022a; Zhao et al., 2022). Herein, we demonstrated that DDX21 redistributed to the cytoplasm from the nucleolus during PCV2 infection (Figure 1), suggesting that PCV2 infection induces DDX21 relocation to inhibit innate immunity and facilitate viral replication; however, the underlying mechanisms need further study. We propose that the “dual” location of DDX21 protein plays important functions in RNA metabolism (nucleolus), and regulation of cellular innate immune responses in the cytoplasm. Until now, the study between DDX21 and DNA virus replication was explored only once. Thus, how DDX21 binding to Cap regulates the life cycle of PCV2 remains unclear.

The NLSs of viral proteins are deemed as fundamental elements (Wurm et al., 2001). Certain viral proteins harboring NLSs are important for regulating cell division, and viral replication (Matthews, 2001). There are no consensus sequences within the NLS, despite the sequences being monopartite or bipartite (Silver, 1991). Transcription and translation of the circovirus genome undergoes in the nucleus, and the import of viral DNA requires karyophilic proteins. For PCVs, the NLS is important for virus replication (Cheung and Bolin, 2002). The PCV2 Cap NLS could bind to gC1qR on the nuclear membrane for regulating DNA binding to promote viral replication (Fotso et al., 2016). The results suggest that the PCV2 Cap NLS may promote DNA binding for regulating viral replication as well.

The present results demonstrated that PCV2 Cap binds directly to DDX21 (Figure 2), but we are not sure which form of PCV2 Cap (Cap monomer or Cap-60 polymerized) interacting with DDX21, and future studies are planned to further investigate the PCV2 Cap-DDX21 interaction. Moreover, further investigation is also required to elucidate a specific mechanism. Furthermore, the results showed that the PCV2 Cap NLS is essential for interaction with DDX21 (Figure 3). In addition, we proved that 763GSRSNRFQNK772 is critical for interaction with the PCV2 Cap NLS (Figure 4), which were similar to the previous results (Zhou et al., 2022a). Since the PCV2 Cap NLS acts as a DDX21 binding site, we hypothesize that DDX21 may facilitate nuclear import of PCV2 Cap. The DDX21-CTD was reported to bind to c-Jun, and its deletion promotes DDX21 redistribution (Holmstrom et al., 2008). Therefore, it is possible that the C-terminus deletion of DDX21 abrogates the interaction with its binding ligand and thus alters its nucleolar distribution. The DDX21 targets the PCV2 Cap to the nucleus via interaction with NLS, thereby facilitating virus replication. PCV2 Cap might enter the nucleus to promote virus replication, or to hijack cell cycle and synthesize cellular proteins during infection (Finsterbusch et al., 2005). In the future, it will be worth demonstrating whether PCV2 Cap interaction with other host proteins regulates virus replication.

In summary, the results of this study show that the PCV2 infection induces translocation of DDX21 to the cytoplasm from the nucleolus. Additionally, we demonstrate that the PCV2 Cap NLS interacts with DDX21. The NLS of the PCV2 Cap and 763GSRSNRFQNK772 residues at the CTD of DDX21 are necessary for the dual interaction. Furthermore, DDX21 expression facilitates viral replication. Collectively, the results demonstrate that DDX21 interacts directly with the Cap NLS and promotes virus replication, thereby contributing to discovering novel potential targets for prevention and control of PCV2 infection.

Materials and methods

Cells and viruses

The PK-15 cell line (CCL-33, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) was maintained in minimal essential medium (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Human embryonic kidney epithelial (HEK) 293T cells (CRL-3216, ATCC) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco). The DDX21-knockdown PK-15 cells were constructed as previously described (Zhou et al., 2022a). All media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (S711-001S; LONSERA, Shanghai Shuangru Biology Science & Technology Co., Ltd, China) as previously described (Zhou et al., 2022c). PCV2 strain BJW (accession no. AY847748.1) was propagated in PK-15 cells (Liu et al., 2005).

Antibodies and reagents

Mouse anti-β-actin (M1210-2), anti-histone H3 (R1105-1), anti-glutathione S-transferase (GST; M0807-1) mAbs, and rabbit anti-GFP (SR48-02), anti-β-tubulin (0807-2), anti-FLAG (0912-1), and anti-MYC (R1208-1) pAbs were obtained from Huaan Biological Technology (Hangzhou, China). Rabbit mAb against DDX21 (ab182156) was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). Mouse mAbs to Cap and Rep of PCV2 were produced by our laboratory (Liu et al., 2005). Anti-FLAG affinity resin (A2220) was obtained from Sigma–Aldrich. The ExFect transfection reagent (T101-01/02) was obtained from Vazyme Biotechnology (Nanjing, China). All the antibodies and reagents were purchased and described previously (Zhou et al., 2020, 2022a).

Plasmid construction and cell transfection

The PCV2 Cap plasmids were constructed as described previously (Zhou et al., 2020, 2021a). The resulting plasmids were FLAG-Cap (which the FLAG tag is placed on the N terminal of Cap), MYC-Cap (which the MYC tag is placed on the N terminal of Cap), His-Sumo-Cap (which the His tag is placed on the N terminal of Sumo-Cap), FLAG-GST-Cap, GFP-Cap-WT-(1-233aa), GFP-Cap-M1-(42-233aa), and GFP-Cap-M2-(1-41aa). The full-length and truncated DDX21 (accession no. KX396051.1) variants were constructed as previously described (Zhou et al., 2022a). The primers used are listed in Table 1. Cell transfection was conducted as previously described (Zhou et al., 2022b).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. List of primers adopted in the study.

Confocal microscopy

Confocal microscopy was performed as previously described (Zhou et al., 2022c).

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and western blotting

Cells were lysed in lysis buffer after infection or other treatments as for western blotting described previously (Zhou et al., 2020). SDS-PAGE and western blotting were performed as previously described (Zhou et al., 2022a).

Co-immunoprecipitation and glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays

For Co-IP assays, the detailed procedures were conducted as previously described (Zhou et al., 2020). For the conventional and unconventional GST pull-down assays, the detailed procedures were conducted as described elsewhere (Zhou et al., 2021a,b, 2022a).

Nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction

Nuclear and cytoplasmic components were isolated as previously described (Zhou et al., 2020).

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as means ± standard deviations (SD). Statistical analysis was conducted using Student’s t-test. p-values of < 0.05 were considered significant.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

JwZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. JiZ: Data curation, Validation, Writing – review and editing. HS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft. BD: Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Writing – review and editing. NZ: Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review and editing. QD: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review and editing. YQ: Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing. DW: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. YC: Methodology, Writing – review and editing. JG: Data curation, Writing – review and editing. XF: Data curation, Software, Writing – review and editing. LH: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. JL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD1800303), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20210807), the Introduction Program of High-Level Innovation and Entrepreneurship Doctors of Jiangsu Province, the Introduction Program of High-Level Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talents (Excellent Doctors) of Yangzhou City, the Introduction Program of High-Level Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talents of Jiangsu Province, the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (SJCX23_2017), the Undergraduate Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project of Yangzhou University (X20220681_2022), the 111 Project D18007, and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1298106/full#supplementary-material

References

Abbas, A., Taylor, L. J., Collman, R. G., Bushman, F. D., and Ictv Report, C. (2021). ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Redondoviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 102:jgv001526. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001526

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Abdullah, S. W., Wu, J., Zhang, Y., Bai, M., Guan, J., Liu, X., et al. (2021). DDX21, a host restriction factor of FMDV IRES-dependent translation and replication. Viruses 13:1765. doi: 10.3390/v13091765

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ali, M. A. M. (2021). The DEAD-box protein family of RNA helicases: Sentinels for a myriad of cellular functions with emerging roles in tumorigenesis. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 795–825. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-01892-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Allan, G. M., McNeilly, F., Kennedy, S., Daft, B., Clarke, E. G., Ellis, J. A., et al. (1998). Isolation of porcine circovirus-like viruses from pigs with a wasting disease in the USA and Europe. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 10, 3–10. doi: 10.1177/104063879801000102

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bonaventure, B., and Goujon, C. (2022). DExH/D-box helicases at the frontline of intrinsic and innate immunity against viral infections. J. Gen. Virol. 103, 1–19.

Google Scholar

Breitbart, M., Delwart, E., Rosario, K., Segales, J., Varsani, A., and Ictv Report, C. (2017). ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Circoviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 98, 1997–1998. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000871

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Calo, E., Flynn, R. A., Martin, L., Spitale, R. C., Chang, H. Y., and Wysocka, J. (2015). RNA helicase DDX21 coordinates transcription and ribosomal RNA processing. Nature 518, 249–253. doi: 10.1038/nature13923

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, G. F., Liu, C. H., Zhou, L. G., and Krug, R. M. (2014). Cellular DDX21 RNA helicase inhibits influenza A virus replication but is counteracted by the viral NS1 protein. Cell Host Microbe 15, 484–493.

Google Scholar

Cheung, A. K., and Bolin, S. R. (2002). Kinetics of porcine circovirus type 2 replication. Arch. Virol, 147, 43–58. doi: 10.1007/s705-002-8302-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, Y. C., Ye, W., Yang, J., Han, P. J., Wang, Y., Ye, C. T., et al. (2016). DDX21 translocates from nucleus to cytoplasm and stimulates the innate immune response due to dengue virus infection. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 473, 648–653.

Google Scholar

Finsterbusch, T., Steinfeldt, T., Caliskan, R., and Mankertz, A. (2005). Analysis of the subcellular localization of the proteins Rep, Rep’ and Cap of porcine circovirus type 1. Virology 343, 36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.08.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Finsterbusch, T., Steinfeldt, T., Doberstein, K., Rodner, C., and Mankertz, A. (2009). Interaction of the replication proteins and the capsid protein of porcine circovirus type 1 and 2 with host proteins. Virology 386, 122–131. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.12.039

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Flores-Rozas, H., and Hurwitz, J. (1993). Characterization of a new RNA helicase from nuclear extracts of HeLa cells which translocates in the 5’ to 3’ direction. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 21372–21383.

Google Scholar

Fotso, G. B. K., Bernard, C., Bigault, L., de Boisseson, C., Mankertz, A., Jestin, A., et al. (2016). The expression level of gC1qR is down regulated at the early time of infection with porcine circovirus of type 2 (PCV-2) and gC1qR interacts differently with the Cap proteins of porcine circoviruses. Virus Res. 220, 21–32. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2016.04.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fuller-Pace, F. V. (2006). DExD/H box RNA helicases: Multifunctional proteins with important roles in transcriptional regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 4206–4215.

Google Scholar

Hao, H., Han, T., Xuan, B., Sun, Y., Tang, S., Yue, N., et al. (2019). Dissecting the role of DDX21 in regulating human cytomegalovirus replication. J. Virol. 93:e01222-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01222-19

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

He, J., Cao, J., Zhou, N., Jin, Y., Wu, J., and Zhou, Z. J. (2013). Identification and functional analysis of the novel ORF4 protein encoded by porcine circovirus type 2. J. Virol. 87, 1420–1429. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01443-12

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Heath, L., Williamson, A. L., and Rybicki, E. P. (2006). The capsid protein of beak and feather disease virus binds to the viral DNA and is responsible for transporting the replication-associated protein into the nucleus. J. Virol. 80, 7219–7225.

Google Scholar

Hirai, Y., Louvet, E., Oda, T., Kumeta, M., Watanabe, Y., Horigome, T., et al. (2013). Nucleolar scaffold protein, WDR46, determines the granular compartmental localization of nucleolin and DDX21. Genes Cells 18, 780–797.

Google Scholar

Hiscox, J. A. (2002). The nucleolus-a gateway to viral infection? Arch. Virol. 147, 1077–1089.

Google Scholar

Holmstrom, T. H., Mialon, A., Kallio, M., Nymalm, Y., Mannermaa, L., Holm, T., et al. (2008). c-Jun supports ribosomal RNA processing and nucleolar localization of RNA helicase DDX21. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 7046–7053. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709613200

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, D., Wang, J., Xu, S., Cai, S., Ao, C., Fang, L., et al. (2018). Identification and functional analysis of the novel ORF6 protein of porcine circovirus type 2 in vitro. Vet. Res. Commun. 42, 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s11259-017-9702-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Fang, P., Zhou, Y., Wang, D., Fang, L., and Xiao, S. (2022a). DEAD-box RNA helicase 21 negatively regulates cytosolic RNA-mediated innate immune signaling. Front. Immunol. 13:956794. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.956794

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Wang, D., Fang, P., Pang, Y., Zhou, Y., Fang, L., et al. (2022b). DEAD-Box RNA helicase 21 (DDX21) positively regulates the replication of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus via multiple mechanisms. Viruses 14:467. doi: 10.3390/v14030467

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, L., McGraw, S., Zhu, K., Leutenegger, C. M., Marks, S. L., Kubiski, S., et al. (2013). Circovirus in tissues of dogs with vasculitis and hemorrhage. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 19, 534–541. doi: 10.3201/eid1904.121390

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lian, H., Liu, Y., Li, N., Wang, Y., Zhang, S., and Hu, R. (2014). Novel circovirus from mink. China. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20, 1548–1550. doi: 10.3201/eid2009.140015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Chen, I., and Kwang, J. (2005). Characterization of a previously unidentified viral protein in porcine circovirus type 2-infected cells and its role in virus-induced apoptosis. J. Virol. 79, 8262–8274. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.13.8262-8274.2005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., Zhang, X., Xu, G., Wang, Z., Shen, H., Lian, K., et al. (2021). Emergence of porcine circovirus-like viruses associated with porcine diarrheal disease in China. Transbound Emerg. Dis. 68, 3167–3173. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14223

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lorincz, M., Csagola, A., Farkas, S. L., Szekely, C., and Tuboly, T. (2011). First detection and analysis of a fish circovirus. J. Gen. Virol. 92(Pt 8), 1817–1821. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.031344-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lv, Q., Guo, K., Xu, H., Wang, T., and Zhang, Y. (2015). Identification of putative ORF5 protein of porcine circovirus type 2 and functional analysis of GFP-fused ORF5 protein. PLoS One 10:e0127859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127859

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mankertz, A., Mankertz, J., Wolf, K., and Buhk, H. J. (1998). Identification of a protein essential for replication of porcine circovirus. J. Gen. Virol. 79(Pt 2), 381–384. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-79-2-381

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Matthews, D. A. (2001). Adenovirus protein V induces redistribution of nucleolin and B23 from nucleolus to cytoplasm. J. Virol. 75, 1031–1038.

Google Scholar

Mcrae, E. K. S., Davidson, D. E., Dupas, S. J., and McKenna, S. A. (2018). Insights into the RNA quadruplex binding specificity of DDX21. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Sub.s 1862, 1973–1979.

Google Scholar

Nauwynck, H. J., Sanchez, R., Meerts, P., Lefebvre, D. J., Saha, D., Huang, L., et al. (2012). Cell tropism and entry of porcine circovirus 2. Virus Res. 164, 43–45.

Google Scholar

Nawagitgul, P., Morozov, I., Bolin, S. R., Harms, P. A., Sorden, S. D., and Paul, P. S. (2000). Open reading frame 2 of porcine circovirus type 2 encodes a major capsid protein. J. Gen. Virol. 81(Pt 9), 2281–2287. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-81-9-2281

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Palinski, R., Pineyro, P., Shang, P. C., Yuan, F. F., Guo, R., Fang, Y., et al. (2017). A novel porcine circovirus distantly related to known circoviruses is associated with porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome and reproductive failure. J. Virol. 91:e01879-16. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01879-16

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Phenix, K. V., Weston, J. H., Ypelaar, I., Lavazza, A., Smyth, J. A., Todd, D., et al. (2001). Nucleotide sequence analysis of a novel circovirus of canaries and its relationship to other members of the genus Circovirus of the family Circoviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 82(Pt 11), 2805–2809. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-82-11-2805

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Salvetti, A., and Greco, A. (2014). Viruses and the nucleolus: The fatal attraction. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1842, 840–847. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.12.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schoemaker, N. J., Dorrestein, G. M., Latimer, K. S., Lumeij, J. T., Kik, M. J., van der Hage, M. H., et al. (2000). Severe leukopenia and liver necrosis in young African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus erithacus) infected with psittacine circovirus. Avian Dis. 44, 470–478.

Google Scholar

Silver, P. A. (1991). How proteins enter the nucleus. Cell 64, 489–497.

Google Scholar

Song, C. L., Hotz-Wagenblatt, A., Voit, R., and Grummt, I. (2017). SIRT7 and the DEAD-box helicase DDX21 cooperate to resolve genomic R loops and safeguard genome stability. Genes Dev. 31, 1370–1381.

Google Scholar

Tischer, I., Gelderblom, H., Vettermann, W., and Koch, M. A. (1982). A very small porcine virus with circular single-stranded-DNA. Nature 295, 64–66. doi: 10.1038/295064a0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Todd, D., Weston, J. H., Soike, D., and Smyth, J. A. (2001). Genome sequence determinations and analyses of novel circoviruses from goose and pigeon. Virology 286, 354–362. doi: 10.1006/viro.2001.0985

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ullah, R., Li, J., Fang, P., Xiao, S., and Fang, L. (2022). DEAD/H-box helicases: Anti-viral and pro-viral roles during infections. Virus Res. 309:198658. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2021.198658

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Valdez, B. C., Henning, D., Busch, R. K., Woods, K., Flores-Rozas, H., Hurwitz, J., et al. (1996). A nucleolar RNA helicase recognized by autoimmune antibodies from a patient with watermelon stomach disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 1220–1224. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.7.1220

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Watanabe, Y., Ohtaki, N., Hayashi, Y., Ikuta, K., and Tomonaga, K. (2009). Autogenous translational regulation of the Borna disease virus negative control factor X from polycistronic mRNA using host RNA helicases. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000654. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000654

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wiederkehr, D. D., Sydler, T., Buergi, E., Haessig, M., Zimmermann, D., Pospischil, A., et al. (2009). A new emerging genotype subgroup within PCV2b dominates the PMWS epizooty in Switzerland. Vet. Microbiol. 136, 27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.10.028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, W., Qu, Y., Yu, S., Wang, S., Yin, Y., Liu, Q., et al. (2021). Caspase-dependent cleavage of DDX21 suppresses host innate immunity. mBio 12, e0100521. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01005-21

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wurm, T., Chen, H. Y., Hodgson, T., Britton, P., Brooks, G., and Hiscox, J. A. (2001). Localization to the nucleolus is a common feature of coronavirus nucleoproteins, and the protein may disrupt host cell division. J. Virol. 75, 9345–9356.

Google Scholar

Zhang, H. H., Hu, W. Q., Li, J. Y., Liu, T. N., Zhou, J. Y., Opriessnig, T., et al. (2020). Novel circovirus species identified in farmed pigs designated as Porcine circovirus 4. Hunan province, China. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 67, 1057–1061. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13446

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., Kim, T., Bao, M., Facchinetti, V., Jung, S. Y., Ghaffari, A. A., et al. (2011). DDX1, DDX21, and DHX36 helicases form a complex with the adaptor molecule TRIF to sense dsRNA in dendritic cells. Immunity 34, 866–878. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.027

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, K., Guo, X. R., Liu, S. F., Liu, X. N., Han, Y., Wang, L. L., et al. (2022). 2B and 3C proteins of Senecavirus A antagonize the antiviral activity of DDX21 via the caspase-dependent degradation of DDX21. Front. Immunol. 13:951984. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.951984

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, L., Rosario, K., Breitbart, M., and Duffy, S. (2019). Eukaryotic circular Rep-encoding single-stranded DNA (CRESS DNA) viruses: Ubiquitous viruses with small genomes and a diverse host range. Adv. Virus Res. 103, 71–133. doi: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2018.10.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, J., Li, H., Yu, T., Li, J., Dong, W., Ojha, N. K., et al. (2020). Protein interactions network of porcine circovirus type 2 capsid with host proteins. Front. Microbiol. 11:1129. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01129

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, J., Li, J., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Dong, W., Jin, Y., et al. (2021a). The serine-48 residue of nucleolar phosphoprotein nucleophosmin-1 plays critical role in subcellular localization and interaction with porcine circovirus type 3 capsid protein. Vet. Res. 52:4. doi: 10.1186/s13567-020-00876-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, J., Qiu, Y. H., Zhu, N., Zhou, L. Y., Dai, B. N., Feng, X. F., et al. (2021b). The nucleolar localization signal of porcine circovirus type 4 capsid protein is essential for interaction with serine-48 residue of nucleolar phosphoprotein nucleophosmin-1. Front. Microbiol. 12:751382. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.751382

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, J., Wang, Y., Qiu, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, X., Liu, C., et al. (2022a). Contribution of DEAD-box RNA helicase 21 to the nucleolar localization of porcine circovirus type 4 capsid protein. Front. Microbiol. 13:802740. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.802740

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, J. W., Qiu, Y. H., Zhao, J., Wang, Y. X., Zhu, N., Wang, D. D., et al. (2022c). The network of interactions between the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus nucleocapsid and host cellular proteins. Viruses 14:2269. doi: 10.3390/v14102269

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, J., Wang, Y., Zhou, L., Qiu, Y., Zhao, J., Dai, B., et al. (2022b). Interaction network of porcine circovirus type 3 and 4 capsids with host proteins. Viruses 14:939. doi: 10.3390/v14050939

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: porcine circovirus type 2, capsid protein, nuclear localization signal, DEAD-box RNA helicase 21, virus replication

Citation: Zhou J, Zhao J, Sun H, Dai B, Zhu N, Dai Q, Qiu Y, Wang D, Cui Y, Guo J, Feng X, Hou L and Liu J (2024) DEAD-box RNA helicase 21 interacts with porcine circovirus type 2 Cap protein and facilitates viral replication. Front. Microbiol. 15:1298106. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1298106

Received: 21 September 2023; Accepted: 22 January 2024;
Published: 06 February 2024.

Edited by:

Reena Ghildyal, University of Canberra, Australia

Reviewed by:

Changxu Song, South China Agricultural University, China
Yonghou Jiang, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, China

Copyright © 2024 Zhou, Zhao, Sun, Dai, Zhu, Dai, Qiu, Wang, Cui, Guo, Feng, Hou and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jianwei Zhou, and6aG91QHl6dS5lZHUuY24=; Jue Liu, bGl1anVlQDI2My5uZXQ=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.