Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Microbiol., 11 October 2023
Sec. Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants

Corrigendum: Investigating genetic diversity within the most abundant and prevalent non-pathogenic leaf-associated bacteria interacting with Arabidopsis thaliana in natural habitats

\r\nDaniela Ramírez-Snchez&#x;Daniela Ramírez-Sánchez1Chrystel Gibelin-Viala&#x;Chrystel Gibelin-Viala1Baptiste Mayjonade&#x;Baptiste Mayjonade1Rmi DuflosRémi Duflos1Elodie BelmonteElodie Belmonte2Vincent PaillerVincent Pailler2Claudia BartoliClaudia Bartoli3Sbastien CarrereSébastien Carrere1Fabienne Vailleau&#x;Fabienne Vailleau1Fabrice Roux
&#x;Fabrice Roux1*‡
  • 1LIPME, INRAE, CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan, France
  • 2Gentyane, UMR 1095 GDEC, INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
  • 3Institute for Genetics, Environment and Plant Protection (IGEPP), INRAE, Institut Agro AgroCampus Ouest, Université de Rennes 1, Le Rheu, France

A corrigendum on
Investigating genetic diversity within the most abundant and prevalent non-pathogenic leaf-associated bacteria interacting with Arabidopsis thaliana in natural habitats

by Ramírez-Sánchez, D., Gibelin-Viala, C., Mayjonade, B., Duflos, R., Belmonte, E., Pailler, V., Bartoli, C., Carrere, S., Vailleau, F., and Roux, F. (2022). Front. Microbiol. 13:984832. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.984832

In the published article, there was an error in the Discussion section. The wording to describe the effect of four bacterial species on plant biostimulation and biocontrol against bacterial pathogens was not precise enough and might have led to some confusion.

A correction has been made to Discussion, Extensive genetic and genomic diversities within leaf-associated bacterial operational taxonomic units, second paragraph. Two sentences previously stated:

“Genome sequencing confirmed or refined the gyrB-based taxonomic affiliation of four OTUs, i.e., P. fungorum (OTU2), Methylobacterium sp. (OTU13) and the two Pseudomonas species P. moraviensis (OTU5) and P. siliginis (OTU6). All these four bacterial species have been shown to act as biocontrol agents, to affect root development, to promote vegetative growth and ultimately yield, of diverse plants such as A. thaliana, potato, strawberry, tomato ad wheat (Hultberg et al., 2010; Ul Hassan and Bano, 2015; Rafikova et al., 2016; Klikno and Kutschera, 2017; Rahman et al., 2018; Grossi et al., 2020). In addition, both P. moraviensis and P. siliginis have been identified as the main candidate bacterial species controlling most members of the root and leaf bacterial pathobiota, in particular P. viridiflava and X. campestris, across natural populations of A. thaliana located south-west of France (Bartoli et al., 2018).”

The corrected sentences appear below:

“Genome sequencing confirmed or refined the gyrB-based taxonomic affiliation of four OTUs, i.e., P. fungorum (OTU2), Methylobacterium sp. (OTU13) and the two Pseudomonas species P. moraviensis (OTU5) and P. siliginis (OTU6). All these four bacterial species have been shown to act either as biocontrol agents, or to affect root development, or to promote vegetative growth and ultimately yield, of diverse plants such as A. thaliana, potato, strawberry, tomato and wheat (Hultberg et al., 2010; Ul Hassan and Bano, 2015; Rafikova et al., 2016; Klikno and Kutschera, 2017; Rahman et al., 2018; Grossi et al., 2020). In addition, both P. moraviensis and P. siliginis have been identified in a large consortium of other bacterial species as candidate antagonists of the root and leaf bacterial pathobiota, in particular P. viridiflava and X. campestris, across natural populations of A. thaliana located south-west of France (Bartoli et al., 2018).”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Bartoli, C., Frachon, L., Barret, M., Rigal, M., Huard-Chauveau, C., Mayjonade, B., et al. (2018). In situ relationships between microbiota and potential pathobiota in Arabidopsis thaliana. ISME J. 12, 2024–2038. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0152-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grossi, C. E. M., Fantino, E., Serral, F., Zawoznik, M. S., Fernandez Do Porto, D. A., and Ulloa, R. M. (2020). Methylobacterium sp. 2A is a plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that has the potential to improve potato crop yield under adverse conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 11:71. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hultberg, M., Alsberg, T., Khalil, S., and Alsanius, B. (2010). Suppression of disease in tomato infected by Pythium ultimum with a biosurfactant produced by Pseudomonas koreensis. Biocontrol 55, 435–444.

Google Scholar

Klikno, J., and Kutschera, U. (2017). Regulation of root development in Arabidopsis thaliana by phytohormone-secreting epiphytic methylobacteria. Protoplasma 254, 1867–1877. doi: 10.1007/s00709-016-1067-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rafikova, G. F., Korshunova, T. Y., Minnebaev, L. F., Chetverikov, S. P., and Loginov, O. N. (2016). A new bacterial strain, Pseudomonas koreensis IB-4, as a promising agent for plant pathogen biological control. Microbiology 85, 333–341.

Google Scholar

Rahman, M., Sabir, A. A., Mukta, J. A., Khan, M. M. A., Mohi-Ud-Din, M., Miah, M. G., et al. (2018). Plant probiotic bacteria Bacillus and Paraburkholderia improve growth, yield and content of antioxidants in strawberry fruit. Sci. Rep. 8:2504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20235-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ul Hassan, T., and Bano, A. (2015). The stimulatory effects of L-tryptophan and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on soil health and physiology of wheat. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 15, 190–201.

Google Scholar

Keywords: microbiota, commensal bacteria, genomic diversity, plant growth promotion, growth kinetics, seed inoculation, seedling inoculation, genotype-by-genotype interactions

Citation: Ramírez-Sánchez D, Gibelin-Viala C, Mayjonade B, Duflos R, Belmonte E, Pailler V, Bartoli C, Carrere S, Vailleau F and Roux F (2023) Corrigendum: Investigating genetic diversity within the most abundant and prevalent non-pathogenic leaf-associated bacteria interacting with Arabidopsis thaliana in natural habitats. Front. Microbiol. 14:1304377. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1304377

Received: 29 September 2023; Accepted: 02 October 2023;
Published: 11 October 2023.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2023 Ramírez-Sánchez, Gibelin-Viala, Mayjonade, Duflos, Belmonte, Pailler, Bartoli, Carrere, Vailleau and Roux. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Fabrice Roux, ZmFicmljZS5yb3V4JiN4MDAwNDA7aW5yYWUuZnI=

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

These authors share senior authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.