Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 07 December 2023
Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy

Screening and characterization of biocontrol bacteria isolated from Ageratum conyzoides against Collectotrichum fructicola causing Chinese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) anthracnose

Xiaolin ChenXiaolin ChenMiaomiao ZhangMiaomiao ZhangLihua TangLihua TangSuiping HuangSuiping HuangTangxun GuoTangxun GuoQili Li\n
\nQili Li *
  • Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control on Fruits and Vegetables in South China Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Biology for Crop Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, China

Chinese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) is a nutritionally and economically important stone fruit widely grown around the world. Anthracnose, caused by Collectotrichum spp., is one of the primary biotic stress factors limiting plum production. Medicinal plants may harbor rhizospheric or endophytic microorganisms that produce bioactive metabolites that can be used as anthracnose biocontrol agents. Here, 27 bacterial isolates from the medicinal plant A. conyzoides with diverse antagonistic activities against C. fructicola were screened. Based on morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization, 25 of these isolates belong to different species of genus Bacillus, one to Pseudomonas monsensis, and one more to Microbacterium phyllosphaerae. Eight representative strains showed high biocontrol efficacy against plum anthracnose in a pot experiment. In addition, several Bacillus isolates showed a broad spectrum of inhibitory activity against a variety of fungal phytopathogens. Analysis of the volatile organic compound profile of these eight representative strains revealed a total of 47 compounds, most of which were ketones, while the others included alkanes, alkenes, alcohols, pyrazines, and phenols. Overall, this study confirmed the potential value of eight bacterial isolates for development as anthracnose biocontrol agents.

1 Introduction

The Chinese plum is one of the most important and delicious fruit crops in the world, grown widely in China, the United States, Japan, and Europe (Wu et al., 2018; Wei et al., 2021). Plum fruits possess high nutritional and economic values, as they are rich in carbohydrates, malic acid, phenolic compounds, anthocyanins, vitamin C, β-carotene, and minerals (Roussos, 2016). Although native to China, the Chinese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) is also called Japanese plum because the species was first imported into the United States from Japan (Fanning et al., 2014). China is the largest plum producer, with an annual production of 6,615,469 tons in 2021, which accounted for 55.1% of the global total production (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2018).

The production of Chinese plums can be negatively affected by various factors, including a range of diseases (Long et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2022; Shu et al., 2022; Lu et al., 2022a,b). Indeed, the Chinese plum is vulnerable to a variety of diseases, one of the most destructive of which is plum anthracnose, caused by the fungus Colletotrichum (Huang et al., 2022). To date, C. fructicola, C. gloeosporioides, C. cigarro, C. siamense, and C. aeschynomenes have been reported as the causative agents of plum anthracnose in China (Huang et al., 2022; Lu et al., 2022a). The pathogen mainly infects the leaves of the plum tree, generally manifesting as yellowish spots or lesions, followed by withering at later stages of the disease. In turn, the resulting reduction in total tree leaf-area limits photosynthesis, nutrient absorption, and growth, ultimately leading to reduced fruit quality and severe yield losses. In addition, plum fruits with visible anthracnose, characterized by sunken, round, and brown necrotic lesions, also experience reduced fruit production at harvest, resulting in considerable economic loss (Hassan et al., 2019).

Most Colletotrichum species are plurivorous anthracnose pathogens that infect a wide range of host plants, including many other fruit-tree species besides Prunus salicina Lindl (Cannon et al., 2012). To date, anthracnose prevention still relies primarily on chemical control (Wang Q. H. et al., 2020; Wang Z. et al., 2020). Conventional fungicides, such as difenoconazole, prochloraz, tebuconazole, benomyl, and pyraclostrobin are the most common commercial products used to control anthracnose disease in Chinese plum orchards (Dowling et al., 2020; Wang Q. H. et al., 2020; Wang Z. et al., 2020). However, the continuous use of agricultural chemicals directly or indirectly pollutes the air, water, soil, and the overall ecosystem, posing serious health hazards for all living organisms. Therefore, biological control based on the use of microorganisms with antagonistic activities provides a safe and sustainable alternative for controlling phytopathogenic fungi.

Plant-beneficial bacteria that protect plants from disease by living as rhizospheric or endophytic microorganisms, such as Bacillus, Streptomyces, Pseudomonas, and Burkholderia have been well documented (Ryu et al., 2014; Boukaew et al., 2017; Guevara-Avendaño et al., 2019; Jin et al., 2019; Soo et al., 2021; Choub et al., 2022; Mehmood et al., 2023; Rodríguez-Cisneros et al., 2023). Some of the bacteria in the genera Bacillus and Pseudomonas have been demonstrated to have the ability to control anthracnose (Jin et al., 2019; Soo et al., 2021; Choub et al., 2022). Among such antagonistic bacteria, Bacillus species are prominent and used as biocontrol agents due to their ubiquitous nature, broad adaptability, and endospore-forming characteristics (Radhakrishnan et al., 2017). Plant-associated antagonistic bacteria have different biocontrol mechanisms against phytopathogens, including competition for resources, production of antimicrobial metabolites, such as antibiotics and lipopeptides, and emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), such as ketones and sulfur compounds that can induce plant defense responses and/or antagonize fungal pathogens (Grahovac et al., 2023). For instance, B. subtilis controls C. gloeosporioides by producing antifungal lipopeptides, including iturin A, fengycin, surfactin A, and/or bacillomycin D (Jin et al., 2019). In turn, some rhizobacteria, such as Pseudomonas and Bacillus, emit VOCs with antifungal activity against C. gloeosporioides (Guevara-Avendaño et al., 2019; Choub et al., 2022).

Medicinal plants may harbor rhizospheric or endophytic microorganisms that produce bioactive metabolites and may thus be used as biocontrol candidates (Köberl et al., 2013; Aydi Ben Abdallah et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2018; Wicaksono et al., 2018; Momin and Ibrahim, 2020; Zhou A. et al., 2022; Zhou J. et al., 2022). Further, a significant number of bioactive compounds from medicinal plants are now actually known to be produced by associated microbes (Köberl et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2018). A case in point, Ageratum conyzoides (Asteraceae) is an annual aromatic herb with great therapeutic importance in many countries worldwide, especially in tropical and subtropical regions. This medicinal plant possesses antifungal potential owning to the secondary metabolites it accumulates against different fungal pathogens, such as Aspergillus, Alternaria, Candida, Fusarium, Phytophthora, and Pythium (Chahal et al., 2021). Additionally, it was previously revealed that endophytic bacteria isolated from A. conyzoides exhibited the potential for plant-growth-promoting activities in vitro (Momin and Ibrahim, 2020). However, little is known regarding the antimicrobial activity of bacteria isolated from A. conyzoides. Therefore, this study aimed to isolate and characterize bacteria from A. conyzoides, evaluate their antagonistic activity against plum anthracnose, and confirm their antagonistic activity against a wide range of fungal phytopathogens. In addition, the composition and content of VOCs produced by representative bacterial isolates that showed high antifungal activity in the two-sealed-plate assay were also investigated. Overall, our study confirmed the potential value of eight bacterial isolates obtained from A. conyzoides as biocontrol agents.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Sampling and microbial strain isolation

Ageratum conyzoides samples were collected from Nanning, Hechi, and Yulin cities in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, southern China. Flowers, leaves, stems, and roots were selected for the isolation of microbial strains. The A. conyzoides sampled organs were cut into small fragments (1 cm in size), sterilized with 75% ethanol for 10 s followed by 2% sodium hypochlorite for 1 min, rinsed three times in sterile water, and homogenized. The samples were allowed to stand for 10 min; then, 100 μL supernatant was diluted to 10−1, 10−2, and 10−3 with sterilized water, and 100 μL of each diluent was spread on LB plates (Supplementary Table S1). After 2 d of incubation at 30°C, different morphotypes were picked up and re-streaked onto LB plates for further purifying a single, pure colony. Subsequently, purified colonies were cultured on LB medium agar (Supplementary Table S1) slants at 4°C and in 25% (v/v) sterile glycerol stock at −80°C for further experiments.

2.2 In vitro antifungal assay for preliminary screening of antagonistic bacteria

Colletotrichum fructicola is the dominant pathogenic species responsible for plum anthracnose (Huang et al., 2022). This species was selected as the preliminary control target- indicator. All bacterial isolates were screened for antagonistic ability using plate confrontation assay (Hong et al., 2022). Generally, the isolated strains were inoculated in LB liquid medium, and cultured on a shaker at 30°C. After cultured for 24 h at 200 rpm, bacterial concentration was adjusted to an OD600 value of 1.0. In the plate confrontation assay, the bacterial suspension was streaked using an inoculation loop on the left side of the PDA plate 2 cm away from the edge. A mycelial plug (5 mm in diameter) of each phytopathogenic fungus from the 5-day culture was obtained using a sterile cork borer and placed on a PDA plate at a distance of 5 cm from the center of the inoculated strain line. Plates inoculated with only the phytopathogenic fungal plug served as the control group and were incubated at 28°C for 5 days. Treatments were performed in triplicate. The inhibition rate was calculated using the following formula:

I (%) = (r0r1)/r0 × 100

Where I is the inhibition rate, r0 is the radius of the mycelia in the control group, r1 is the radius of the mycelia in the dual-culture plate.

Bacterial VOC antifungal activity assays were performed using the two-sealed-plate method (Cortazar-Murillo et al., 2023). Briefly, a 200-μL aliquot of the overnight culture of each bacterial isolate (OD600 = 1.0) was spread separately on a plate containing LB medium. The lids were removed and replaced with another PDA plate containing a plug of 5 mm diameter of fungal mycelia on the PDA. Both plates were immediately sealed with a double layer of parafilm to prevent volatile leakage and then incubated at 28°C for 5 days. Each bacterial isolate was tested for antifungal activity in triplicate. Three assays were set up without bacterial treatment (LB only) and used as controls. Antifungal activity was measured as the percentage of reduction in mycelial growth. The inhibition rates were calculated using the following formula:

I(%)=d0d1d0×100

Where I is the inhibition rate, d0 is the diameter of mycelial growth in the control, and d1 is the diameter of mycelial growth after exposure to bacterial VOCs.

2.3 Microscopic observation of the effect of antagonistic bacteria on Colletotrichum fructicola

To investigate whether the morphology of C. fructicola causing plum anthracnose was altered by the antagonistic bacteria, the mycelia of C. fructicola colonies in a 5-day dual culture or in the control medium were observed under a Nikon Ni-E microscope.

2.4 Pot experiment to evaluate prevention potential

Potted seedlings of pearl plum, which was developed from the local wild resources of Tian’e County in Guangxi, was used in this experiment. The 2-year-old pearl plum seedlings were transplanted into pots and maintained under uniform field conditions. After growing new leaves, plants in a healthy growth state were selected and prepared for the assays. To prepare bacterial suspensions, each isolate was first grown in LB liquid medium at 30°C in a shaker with 180 rpm for 24 h. All cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 5 min and the supernatants were discarded. The pellets were washed, resuspended in 0.05% tween-20 solution, and adjusted to a population density of 1.0 × 107 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL. To obtain the fungal inoculum, after growing on a PDA plate for 5 days, a 5-mm diameter mycelia plug of C. fructicola was inoculated in PDB liquid medium with a shaking speed of 180 rpm at 28°C in a shaker incubator for 3–4 days. The conidia were collected by filtration and centrifugation, and adjusted to a density of 1.0 × 106 conidia/mL. First, the bacterial suspension was sprayed onto the leaves of the pearl plum seedlings and the control was sprayed with a suspension containing 0.05% tween-20. After the pear plum seedlings were kept in a greenhouse with relative humidity between 75 and 90% for 24 h, 10 μL of conidia suspension was inoculated on each leaf where a round filter paper sheet (0.5 cm in diameter) was placed for moisture. Tree seedlings were inoculated with each strain.

After 5 days, the leaves of the pearl plum trees were examined for symptoms of C. fructicola infection and disease severity based on the diameter of necrosis, and disease prevention efficacy was calculated according to the following formula:

Pe(%)=d0d1d0×100

where Pe is prevention efficacy, d0 is the diameter of necrotic lesions when the leaves were inoculated with conidia but without bacterial suspension, and d1 is the diameter of necrotic lesions that developed when leaves were inoculated with conidia added with bacterial suspension.

2.5 Molecular identification

The antagonistic bacteria were grown in an LB liquid medium at 37°C in a shaker incubator at 180 rpm for 24 h. Genomic DNA was extracted using a TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (Tiangen Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).16S rDNA, gyrA, gyrB, and rpoB gene fragments of the isolates were amplified using the primers (Roberts et al., 1994; Yamamoto and Harayama, 1995; De Clerck et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2013) listed in Supplementary Table S2. The PCR amplification system consisted of 50 μL of 5 × PCR buffer 10 μL, 4 μL of dNTPs (2.5 mM), 1.5 μL of each primer (10 μM), 0.5 μL DNA polymerase, 1 μL DNA template and adequate ddH2O to the final volume of 50 μL. The PCR cycle conditions are listed in Supplementary Table S2, and the PCR products were detected by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis. Amplified products were sequenced by Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The resulting sequence analysis was performed via BLASTN alignment on NCBI, and the sequences were submitted to GenBank to obtain gene accession numbers. 16S rDNA gene sequences, gyrA, gyrB, and rpoB with high similarity were used to concatenate and construct phylogenetic trees using the maximum likelihood method with bootstrap analysis of 1,000 replicates in the MEGA X software.

2.6 Morphological, physiological, and biochemical characterization of antagonistic bacteria

Antagonistic bacterial strains were characterized according to morphological characteristics, such as colony margin, shape, and color, as well as physiological and biochemical characteristics, including Gram reaction, salt tolerance, contact enzyme, V-P test, methyl red (MR) test, citrate utilization, gelatin liquefaction, amylolysis, starch hydrolysis, and carbon source utilization, based on the methods of Berger’s Manual of Bacterial Identification (Holt et al., 1994) and the Common Bacterial Systems Identification Manual (Dong and Cai, 2001).

2.7 Evaluation of the antagonistic spectrum of the antagonistic bacteria

The antagonistic spectra of the bacterial isolates against 14 fungal phytopathogens, namely, Botryosphaeria dothidea, Neoscytalidium dimidiatum, Pseudofusicoccum violaceum, Rhizoctonia solani, Exserohilum sp., Peronophythora litchi, Fusarium sulawesiense, Phanerochaete sordida, Alternaria brassicae, Epicoccum sorghinum, Diaporthe phoenicicola, D. phaseolorum, C. fructicola, and Magnaporthe oryzae were determined by the plate confrontation assay as described above. The phytopathogens were collected and stored in a low-temperature refrigerator at our laboratory.

2.8 Effects of different mediums on the antagonistic activity of VOCs

The LB, NA, PSA, and PDA culture media were tested to determine the impact of their composition on the production of VOCs and their involvement in antifungal activity. After growing in PDB, LB, NB, and PSB liquid medium at 30°C in a shaker with 180 rpm for 24 h, 200-μL aliquots of the overnight culture of the isolated bacterial strains were spread on the PDA, LB, NA, and PSA plates, respectively. The two-sealed-plate assay method described above was used for the preliminary assay, and the antagonistic activities of VOCs were compared. The strain with the highest inhibition rate was dual-cultured with C. fructicola in two-sealed plates for 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h to determine the optimum time for identification.

2.9 VOCs identification of bacterial isolates by headspace solid phase microextraction/GC–MS (HS-SPME/GC–MS)

The VOCs emitted by the bacterial isoaltes were identified using headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (HS-SPME/GC–MS). The following treatment was used to prepare VOCs: each of the eight representative bacterial isolates was grown in LB liquid medium at 30°C in a shaker with 180 rpm for 24 h, then a 200-μL aliquot of the culture was transferred to a headspace vial with 100-mL volume containing 20 mL LB solid medium, and was air-dried on a clean bench. Then, the headspace vial was sealed with a silicone rubber spacer, and placed in a constant temperature incubator at 30°C for 3 days. A headspace vial containing the uninoculated medium was used as a control to remove naturally occurring volatile compounds from each treatment. Subsequently, the headspace vial was placed in a water bath adjusted to 60°C. After equilibration for 5 min, bacterial VOCs were collected with SPME fibers (50/30 μm DVB/CAR/PDMS, Supelco, Inc., Bellefonte, PA), which were inserted into the upper side of the headspace vial for 50 min. Then SPME fibers were injected into the GC port of a gas chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometer (GC/MS, 7890A-5975CMSD, USA). VOCs were desorbed at 280°C for 5 min in the GC injector port interfaced with a mass detector. Helium gas was used as carrier gas (1.0 mL min−1, constant flow) and a DB-5 MS capillary column (30 m length × 0.25 mm inner diameter × 0.25 μm film thickness) from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used as a stationary phase. Operational conditions were the following: initial oven temperature of 40°C for 5 min, increased to 120°C (4°C per min) for 3 min, and further increased to 280°C (30°C per min) for a run time of 10 min. The mass spectrometer was operated in the electron ionization mode at 70 eV with a source temperature of 250°C, and with a continuous scan from 35 to 450 m/z. Data processing was performed using MassHunter software (Agilent Technologies). VOCs were initially identified by comparing MS peaks with those in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 2017 MS Library.

2.10 Biocontrol efficacy evaluation under greenhouse conditions

Plum and inoculum preparations were implemented as described in Section 2.4. Two inoculation methods were used in this study. The first method involved spraying the bacterial suspension for 24 h, followed by inoculation with conidia of C. fructicola (pre-treatment). In the second procedure, the leaves were inoculated with conidia of C. fructicola 24 h before spraying the bacterial suspension (treatment). Three treatments were used: (1) CK, C. fructicola alone, (2) C. fructicola + antagonistic bacterial isolates, and (3) antagonistic bacterial isolates + C. fructicola. Each treatment consisted of three plants with 15 leaves per plant. All pots were kept under greenhouse conditions at a temperature of 28°C and relative humidity between 75 and 90%, under a photoperiod regime of 16 h light /8 h dark.

After 5 days, the leaves of the pearl plum trees were examined for symptoms of C. fructicola infection and disease severity (percentage of infected plant area) based on necrosis symptoms. A severity score on a scale of 0 to 5 was based on the visual scale of necrosis on leaves using the modified method of Choub et al. (2021), where 0 = no sign of visible necrosis, 1 = necrotic area covering less than 5% of the total leaf surface, 2 = necrotic lesions covering 6–5% of the total leaf surface, 3 = necrotic lesions covering 16–25% of the total leaf surface, 4 = necrotic lesions covering 26–50% of the total leaf surface, and 5 = necrotic lesions covering more than 50% of the total leaf surface. The incidence rate, disease index, and control efficacy were calculated using the following formulas:

Incidence rate(%)=Numer of disease leavesTotal number of leaves investigated×100
Disease index(%)=[Number of disease leavesateach level×Corresponding level value]Total number of leaves investigated×5×100
Control efficacy(%)=Disease index inCKDisease index in treatmentDisease index inCK×100

Software DPS 3.01(Tang and Zhang, 2013) was used for statistical analysis. Statistical significance between data groups was determined at p < 0.05 using analysis of variance (ANOV). Data shown are means ± SD (n = 3).

3 Results

3.1 Isolation of antagonistic bacteria and evaluation of in vitro inhibition of Colletotrichum fructicola

To screen the microbial resources for controlling pearl plum anthracnose, a total of 249 bacterial strains were isolated from different plant organs (stems, leaves, flowers, and roots) of the A. conyzoides collected samples. All isolated bacterial strains were screened for antifungal properties against C. fructicola on a dual culture assay. Among them, 27 strains showed varying antagonistic activities; furthermore, particularly, strain AH8 displayed significant antagonism, reaching an inhibition rate of 65.4% in the confrontation plate assay, and strain H16 showed the highest inhibition rate (73.1%) in the two-sealed-plate assay. The inhibition rate of the isolates ranged from 14.1 to 65.4% in the confrontation plate assay and from 13.4 to 73.1% in the two-sealed-plate assay (Figures 1, 2 and Supplementary Table S3). Of the 27 isolates, 9, 6, and 12 were obtained from the flowers, leaves, and stems, respectively (Supplementary Table S4). To determine whether the morphology of C. fructicola was changed upon exposure to the antagonistic bacteria, the mycelia at the front line facing the bacterial colony or the medium control were sampled and observed under a microscope. Microscopic observations showed evidence of morphological alterations in fungal mycelia when C. fructicola was dual-cultured with the antagonistic bacterial isolate (Figure 3), including severe deformation, swelling, and vacuolation of hyphae exposed to bacterial diffusible compounds (Figure 3D), or thin, crimped, branching, and shriveling of hyphae exposed to bacterial VOCs (Figure 3F), in contrast to hyphae without dual cultured with the isolate developed normally (Figure 4B).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The Antagonistic activity of the 27 isolates against C. fructicola in the plate confrontation assay. (A,B) CK, negative control; 1, AH7; 2, AH8; 3, AJ4; 4, AJ5; 5, AJ8; 6, AJ9; 7, AY12; 8, AY13; 9, H11; 10, J1; 11, XYDH11; 12, JB4; 13, XYAH1; 14, XYAH2; 15, AYAJ8; 16, XYBH7; 17, XYBJ13; 18, XYCH7; 19, XYCJ12; 20, JB1; 21, XYDJ1; 22, XYDJ2; 23, Y4; 24, Y5; 25, Y6; 26, YB1, 27, H16. Error bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The Antagonistic activity of the 27 isolates against C. fructicola in the two-sealed-plate assay. (A,B): CK, negative control; 1, AH7; 2, AH8; 3, AJ4; 4, AJ5; 5, AJ8; 6, AJ9; 7, AY12; 8, AY13; 9, H11; 10, J1; 11, XYDH11; 12, JB4; 13, XYAH1; 14, XYAH2; 15, AYAJ8; 16, XYBH7; 17, XYBJ13; 18, XYCH7; 19, XYCJ12; 20, JB1; 21, XYDJ1; 22, XYDJ2; 23, Y4; 24, Y5; 25, Y6; 26, YB1, 27, H16. Error bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Microscopy images of the morphological alterations in the hyphal structure of C. fructicola, causal agent of anthracnose of pearl plum, induced by bacterial isolate AH7. The normal morphology of hyphae in the control groups (A,B), the abnormal hyphae exposed to bacterial diffusible compounds displayed deformation, vacuolation, and swelling (C,D), and hyphae exposed to bacterial VOCs indicated thin, crimped, and shriveling (E,F). Scale bars represent 100 μm.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of bacteria strains of Bacillus spp. based on 16S rDNA-gyrA-rpoB-gyrB gene sequences. Bootstrap support values (1,000 replicates) above 50% are shown at the nodes. The scale bar shows the evolutionary distance between species.

3.2 Molecular identification of antagonistic bacteria

To clarify the taxonomic status of the 27 bacterial isolates, 16S rDNA of each isolate was amplified by PCR using the 16S universal primer pair 27F and 1492R. Gene fragments were sequenced and analyzed using BLAST at NCBI. The data showed that 25 isolates had high sequence identity (above 99%) with Bacillus spp., and were therefore affiliated with that genus, accounting for 92.6% of the total strains. The two other isolates belonged to genera Microbacterium and Pseudomonas. Furthermore, gyrA, rpoB, and gyrB from the 25 Bacillus strains and gyrB from the other 2 strains were amplified and sequenced. All sequences were deposited in GenBank and accession numbers were obtained (Supplementary Table S4). Phylogenetic tree construction based on the concatenated sequences of 16S rDNA, gyrA, rpoB, and gyrB from the 25 isolates and sequences derived from Bacillus type strains revealed that 14, 9, 1, and 1 strains were classified as B. velezensis, B. subtilis, B. altitudinis, and B. cereus, respectively (Figure 4). Phylogenetic analysis of two other strains, YB1 and H16 based on the 16S rDNA and gyrB sequences and sequences derived from the type strains, identified YB1 and H16 as Microbacterium phyllosphaerae and Pseudomonas monsensis, respectively (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of bacteria strains H16 and YB1 based on 16S rDNA-gyrB gene sequences. Bootstrap support values (1,000 replicates) above 50% are shown at the nodes. The scale bar shows the evolutionary distance between species.

Furthermore, a preliminary evaluation of the prevention of C. fructicola damage on pot plants by the 27 antagonistic bacterial isolates showed that most of the bacterial isolates were highly effective in preventing the disease. Among the isolates, XYAH1 and H16 showed the highest prevention efficacy, i.e., 98.4 and 92.0%, respectively (Supplementary Table S5). Therefore, eight representative isolates, B. velezensis XYAH1 and XYCJ12, B. subtilis XYAJ8 and AJ4, B. creceus XYDH11, B. altitudinis J1, P. monsensis H16, and M. phyllosphaerae YB1, were selected for further experiments.

3.3 Morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of antagonistic bacteria

The eight representative isolates were spread on an LB medium plate, placed at 28°C for 2–3 days, and their morphology was observed. Colonies of Bacillus spp. were creamy white, opaque, flat, rough, and wrinkled with irregular edges, and there were no obvious differences between them on LB plates (Supplementary Figure S1). A single colony of P. monsensis H16 was creamy white, round, convex, and smooth, with entire margins. The M. phyllosphaerae YB1 colony was beige-to-yellow, round, convex, and smooth, with entire margins (Supplementary Figure S1). Gram staining of Bacillus spp. was positive, while P. monsensis H16 and M. phyllosphaerae YB1 were Gram-negative (Supplementary Figure S2). Physiological and biochemical characterization revealed that Bacillus spp. grew on LB plates containing 10% NaCl or lower; Meanwhile, M. phyllosphaerae YB1 grew on LB plates containing 7% or less NaCk, and P. monsensis H16 grew on LB plates containing 5% NaCl or less (Supplementary Table S6). There were no apparent differences in the physiological or biochemical characteristics between B. velezensis and B. subtilis. Both effectively used citrate, sucrose, D-maltose, D-sorbitol, D-xylose, inositol, D-fructose, or D-glucose, but not α-lactose, D-galactose, dulcitol, or L- rhamnose. The contact enzyme, gelatin, starch, cellulose, and V-P reactions were positive, whereas the MR reaction was negative (Supplementary Figure S3 and Supplementary Table S7). B. cereus XYDH11 successfully used citrate, sucrose, D-maltose, D-sorbitol, inositol, D-fructose, or D-glucose, but not α-lactose, D-xylose, D-mannitol, D-galactose, dulcitol or L-rhamnose. Other characteristics are the same as B. velezensis and B. subtilis. Characteristics of B. altitudinis J1 are the same as B. cereus XYDH11, except MR and V-P reaction, D-maltose, D-sorbitol, inositol, and D-mannitol utilization. With regard to P. monsensis H16, this strain used citrate, sucrose, D-maltose, inositol, D-mannitol, D-fructose, and D-glucose, but not α-lactose, D-xylose, D-sorbitol, D-galactose, dulcitol or L-rhamnose; other characteristics are the same as B. cereus except MR reaction and starch hodrolysis. As for M. phyllosphaerae YB1, except starch hydrolysi, α-lactose, D-xylose, D-fructose, and D-glucose utilization other characteristics are the same as P. monsensis (Supplementary Figure S3 and Supplemental Table S7).

3.4 Biocontrol efficacy of antagonistic bacteria against plum anthracnose

The biocontrol efficacy of eight representatives against anthracnose of pearl plum was determined under greenhouse conditions. The results showed that all representatives tested had high prevention effectiveness in the pre-treatment, in which case, the prevention efficacy of B. subtilis XYAJ8 and B. altitudinis J1 reached 100%, and the prevention efficacy of all other bacterial strains was no less than 85%. The disease index and incidence rate of anthracnose on pearl plum leaves in the treatments with the eight tested representatives were significantly lower than those in the control group. Especially were the disease index and incidence rate of leaves in the treatment with B. velezensis XYAH1. As a result, in the treatment, B. velezensis XYAH1 was the best with a control efficacy of 98.8%; conversely, M. phyllosphaerae YB1 showed the poorest control efficacy at 42.0%, whereas the others did not significantly differ in efficacy, ranging from 73.3 to 80.2% (Figure 6 and Supplementary Table S8).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Biocontrol efficacy of the representative bacterial isolates against pearl plum anthracnose under greenhouse conditions. (A, B) CK, C. fructicola alone; 1, B. velezensis XYAH1; 2, B. velezensis XYCJ12; 3, B. subtilis XYAJ8;4, B. subtilis AJ4; 5, B. receus XYDH11; 6, B. altitudinis J1; 7, P. monsensis H16; 8,M. phyllosphaerae YB1. Pre: pre-treatment involved spraying bacterial suspension for 24 h first, followed by an inoculation with conidia of C. fructicola, Tre, treatment involved inoculating leaves with conidia of C. fructicola 24 h before bacterial suspension was sprayed. The photos were taken 5 days post-inoculation.

3.5 Inhibitory spectrum of antagonistic bacteria

The selected eight bacterial strains showed diverse inhibitory activities against the 15 fungal phytopathogens tested (Figure 7). Among the tested bacterial strains, Bacillus spp. exhibited relatively better inhibitory effects, whereas P. monsensis and M. phyllosphaerae showed weaker inhibition levels of all tested phytopathogens in the confrontation assay. These results indicated that the Bacillus spp. isolates exhibited broad-spectrum antifungal activity. In addition, except B. cereus XYDH11, most of the Bacillus spp. isolates displayed a high inhibitory effect on Magnaporthe oryzae, with inhibition rates ranging from 88.7 to 95.0%, followed by Peronophythora litchii, with inhibition rates ranging from 55.8 to 73.4%. However, B. cereus XYDH11, P. monsensis H16, and M. phyllosphaerae YB1, had no antagonistic effects on Neoscytalidium dimidiatum, and M. phyllosphaerae YB1 had no antagonistic effect on P. litchii.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Inhibitory effect of the eight bacterial isolates on 15 phytopathogens. (A–H) 1, Botryosphaeria dothidea TEY11A-1; 2, Neoscytalidium dimidiatum HF; 3, Pseudofusicoccum violaceum EGY16A-1; 4, Rhizoctonia solani YMWK; 5, Exserohilum sp. YB33-1; 6, Peronophythora litchii LZ1-3-2; 7, Fusarium sulawesiense TEY15-1; 8, Phanerochaete sordida FY27-1; 9, Alternaria brassicae YB43-2; 10, Epicoccum sorghinum YB53-2; 11, Diaporthe phoenicicola BY58-2; 12, Diaporthe phaseolorum YB3; 13, Colletotrichum fructicola DS1-G-1; 14, C. fructicola GZ15-1; 15, Magnaporthe oryzae 6–6.

3.6 Characterization of bacterial VOCs using HS-SPME/GC–MS

Volatile compounds produced by the eight bacterial strains B. velezensis XYAH1 and XYCJ12, B. subtilis XYAJ8 and AJ4, B. creceus XYDH11, B. altitudinis J1, P. monsensis H16, and M. phyllosphaerae YB1, were identified and quantified using GC/MS following headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME). The data showed that there was no significant difference in the inhibitory effects of strains H16, J1, XYDH11, and XYAJ8 grown in the four different media (Supplementary Table S9). Further, the mean inhibition rate of the eight bacteria grown on LB plates (41.7%) was the highest, whereas the mean inhibition rates on NA, PSA, and PDA plates were 33.5, 31.4, and 33.8%, respectively. Therefore, LB was selected for the analysis of bacterial VOCs. P. monsensis H16, which showed the highest inhibition rate, was dual-cultured with C. fructicola in two-sealed plates for 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h, and the results confirmed that 24 h was the best time (data not shown).

Based on the treatment and bacterial volatile-profile analysis, 47 compounds were identified after analyzing the uninoculated sterile medium, and each strain was cultured in the medium using the NIST reference database comparison with similarity above 90% (Supplementary Table S10). The eight selected bacterial isolates with diverse antifungal activity against C. fructicola indicated different chemical classes, including ketones, alkanes, alkenes, alcohols, pyrazines, and phenols; however, different strains of the same species did not have the same composition, such as B. velezensis XYAH1 and XYCJ12. Additionally, VOCs in the ketone chemical group were present in the volatile profiles of most bacterial isolates and were generally among the most abundant chemical groups (Table 1). The most common VOCs produced by the Bacillus isolates were 2-heptanone, 6-methyl-2-heptanone, 4-ethyl-decane, 2-decanone, 2-dodecanone, 2-heptadecanone, 2-heptanone, 2-hexadecanone, 2-nonanone, 2-tridecanone, butylated hydroxytoluene, D-limonene, dibutyl phthalate, and benzyl alcohol. The abundant VOCs methoxy-phenyl-oxime and dimethyl-silanediol produced by B. subtilis AJ4, were distinguishable from the VOCs produced by all other Bacillus isolates. In P. monsensis H16, volatile compounds especially ketones, were the most abundant and varied compounds particularly 2-nonanone, 2-undecanone, and tridecanone. In contrast, M. phyllosphaerae YB1 mainly contains benzyl alcohol, 4-ethyl-decane, phenylethyl alcohol, and cetene (Supplementary Table S10).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Main chemical compounds of VOCs produced by bacterial isolates via analysis of HS-SPME/GC–MS.

4 Discussion

Conventional methods for controlling crop diseases mainly rely on the use of chemical pesticides. However, increasing evidence suggests that biological control using beneficial microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, and yeasts) is a safe and promising approach for the management of plant diseases (Liu et al., 2013; Radhakrishnan et al., 2017; Hong et al., 2022; Mehmood et al., 2023). Particularly, endophytic bacteria have been isolated from various medicinal plants, which have potential biological control properties (Shurigin et al., 2021; Tripathi et al., 2022; Kashyap et al., 2023).

Chinese plums are susceptible to a variety of diseases, including anthracnose, leaf spots, brown rot, shoot blight, bacterial shot-holes, and fruit blotching (Long et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2022; Shu et al., 2022; Lu et al., 2022a,b; Lei et al., 2023; Wen et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2023a,b). Anthracnose is one of the most serious diseases resulting in destructive leaf blight in the pearl plum cultivar., in Guangxi, China (Huang et al., 2022). Therefore, in this study, we investigated 249 endophytic bacteria from A. conyzoides for their in vitro antagonistic activity against C. fructicola and screened for potential biocontrol agents to control anthracnose of pearl plum. We found that 27 bacterial strains showed varying antifungal activity levels in both the confrontation plate assay and the two-sealed-plate assay. In addition, culture filtrate of the isolates could also inhibit spore germination of C. fructicola completely or partly (data not shown). These findings indicated that the antagonistic properties of these strains may be orchestrated by the emission of soluble and volatile antimicrobial compounds produced by endophytic bacteria with multiple modes of action. Indeed, microscopic observation showed that the morphological alteration in the hyphal structure of C. fructicola induced by isolate AH7 resulted from different substances with different modes of action.

Based on physiological and biochemical indicators, as well as molecular characterization, 25 isolates were classified as different Bacillus species, including B. velezensis, B. subtilis, B. altitudinis, and B. cereus, and two other isolates were identified as P. monsensis and M. phyllosphaerae. Previous studies have demonstrated the potential of many Bacillus and Pseudomonas species for fungal disease control (Ashwini and Srividya, 2014; Guevara-Avendaño et al., 2019; Jin et al., 2019). For instance, the soil-associated B. subtilis strain HN-2 controls C. gloeosporioides by producing the soluble antifungal lipopeptide bacillomycin D, which injures the cell wall and cell membrane of the hyphae and spores, resulting in the exudation of the cytoplasm and organelles inside the cell (Jin et al., 2019). Some rhizobacteria, such as Pseudomonas and Bacillus, emitted VOCs with antifungal activity against C. gloeosporioides (Guevara-Avendaño et al., 2019). Similarly, soil-associated B. velezensis CE 100 exhibits antifungal activity against C. gloeosporioides dependent on various extracellular enzymes, cyclic tetrapeptides, and VOCs that inhibit spore germination and mycelial growth (Choub et al., 2021, 2022). However, endophytic microbes are considered one of the most suitable biocontrol agents because of their high colonization and adaptation potential compared to epiphytic microbes present above or outside the surface of plant tissues (Kashyap et al., 2023).

Walnut trees inoculated with B. velezensis CE 100 culture-broth under field conditions showed only 6.5% anthracnose disease severity compared to 8.7% in the conventional treatment group and 45.1% in the control group (Choub et al., 2021). During the pot experiment in our work, pearl plum seedlings inoculated with B. velezensis XYAH1 showed a disease index of 0.7% in the treatment group and 59.3% in the control group. In short, the eight representative isolates that were sprayed before inoculating the fungal pathogen C. fructicola in the pre-treatment showed highly effective prevention efficacy ranging from 86.5 to 100%. Further, seven isolates that were sprayed after inoculating the pathogen in the treatment also showed high biocontrol potential, with efficacies ranging from 76.1 to 98.8%, except M. phyllosphaerae YB1. Thus, our study clearly showed that endophytic bacteria have the potential to be used as effective biocontrol agents against Chinese plum anthracnose. Nonetheless, additional work is needed to determine the feasibility of their application against multiple strains of the pathogen and in real production environments.

In our study, 27 isolates from A. conyzoides exhibited diverse antagonistic activities in both the confrontation plate assay and the two-sealed-plate assay. In addition, eight representative isolates showed varying degrees of inhibition against a series of fungal pathogens in vitro. Previous studies revealed that endophytes inhibit fungal phytopathogens through several mechanisms: (1) competition for resources, (2) induced systemic resistance, (3) siderophore production, (4) production of soluble antimicrobial compounds, and (5) emission of antimicrobial VOCs (Kashyap et al., 2023). Thus, for instance, the endophytic B. subtilis strain 1-L-29 from Camellia oleifera, which can produce indole acetic acid, solubilized phosphate, and siderophores, and grow on N-free media, demonstrated antagonistic activity against C. siamense, C. asianum, Fusarium proliferatum, Agaricodochium camellia, and P. syringae (Xu et al., 2020). Similarly, B. tequilensis strain YCC 155 from Crotalaria pallida has a direct antifungal effect on C. fructicola and induces enhanced resistance in C. oleifera (Zhou A. et al., 2022). Additionally, B. velezensis BR-01, which produces protease, cellulase, β-1,3-glucanase, chitinase, indoleacetic acid, siderophore, and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, etc., shows strong antagonistic activity against a variety of rice pathogens (Zhou J. et al., 2022). In turn, P. fluorescens strain BSR2010 from Bletilla striata exhibits inhibitory effects against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus, and Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum presumably by producing 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (2,4-DAPG) (Wang et al., 2021). These studies indicate that endophytic bacteria isolated from medicinal plants can produce several antimicrobial or bioactive compounds with novel structures. Therefore, using endophytic bacteria present in medicinal plants is of great theoretical and practical value.

Microbial VOCs are particularly important in pathogen suppression and microbial interactions (Tyc et al., 2016). Volatiles have the advantage of easy diffusion in ambient air and in the air contained in soil pores, whereby they can reach farther distances than bacterial soluble compounds in the soil. Previous studies have shown the antagonistic effects of VOCs produced by the genus Bacillus against a wide range of fungal pathogens (Guevara-Avendaño et al., 2019). Pseudomonas are also capable of emitting antimicrobial VOCs that inhibit the mycelial growth of Phytophthora infestans, Ceratocystis fimbriata, and Rhizoctonia solani (Elkahoui et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2021; Gfeller et al., 2022). In this study, the VOCs profile of eight representative bacterial isolates were analyzed and the compounds belonged principally to ketones, alkanes, alkenes, alcohols, pyrazines, and phenols (Supplementary Table S10). Many compounds were common to the different isolates. Compared to other VOCs, ketones were produced in particularly high amounts. Most of the compounds showed antifungal activities. A previous study revealed that a B. amyloliquefaciens isolate showed antifungal activity against F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense, due to the emission of 2-nonanone, 2-decanone, 2-tridecanone, and 2,3,6-trimethylphenol (Yuan et al., 2012). 2-nonanone and 2-decanone are also emitted by Bacillus pumilus and B. thuringiensis, and show inhibitory effects on the mycelial growth of C. gloeosporioides in postharvest mangoes (Zheng et al., 2013). Moreover, 6-methyl-2-heptanone showed inhibited mycelial growth and conidial vitality of A. solani (Zhang et al., 2022) and 5-methyl-2-heptanone was considered to be the causative antifungal VOC against A. alternata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Curvularia lunata, F. oxysporum, and Penicillium italicum (Morita et al., 2019). These studies indicated that the antifungal activity of ketones was negatively correlated with the number of carbon atoms in the ketones. Notably, in this study, 2-nonanone, 2-undecanone, and 2-tridecanone were the most abundant compounds produced by P. monsensis H16, which significantly inhibited the mycelial growth of C. fructicola. The alkane 2-tridecanone and pentacosane might be involved in the suppression of Alternaria alternata and other fungi (Al-Maawali et al., 2023). However, the ketone 2-decanone and 2-heptanone, and the alkane 4-ethyl-decane and tetradecane seemed to have no inhibition effects on the mycelial growth of Rhizopus stolonifer (Wu et al., 2020). Methoxyphenyl-oxime exhibited a selective antibacterial activity (Barghouthi et al., 2017). Whether this substance possesses antifungal activity needs to be confirmed in further study.

5 Conclusion

Twenty-seven bacterial isolates screened for their antagonistic activities in vitro and in vivo against C. fructicola were obtained from the medicinal plant A. conyzoides for the first time. Particularly, eight representative strains, including B. velezensis XYAH1 and XYCJ12, B. subtilis XYAJ8 and AJ4, B. creceus XYDH11, B. altitudinis J1, P. monsensis H16, and M. phyllosphaerae YB1 showed high biocontrol efficacy against Chines plum anthracnose in potted plant experiments, but additional work needs to be done to determine the feasibility of application of them. Further, several Bacillus isolates showed broad-spectrum inhibitory activities against a variety of fungal phytopathogens. The VOCs profile analysis of the eight representative bacterial isolates revealed a total of 47 compounds, most of which were determined to be ketone, while others included alkanes, alkenes, alcohols, pyrazines, and phenols. These strains have the potential to be used as biocontrol agents for plant diseases. Integrated use of these strains such as the synthesis of mental nanoparticles using the bacterial metabolites with other control strategies could be a promising alternative method to control Chinese plum anthracnose and other plant diseases. However, further study should be conducted in this aspect.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

XC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft. MZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – review & editing. LT: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. SH: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. TG: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. QL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by the Guangxi Key Research and Development Program (Guike AB20159041).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1296755/full#supplementary-material

References

Al-Maawali, S. S., Al-Sadi, A. M., Alsheriqi, S. A. K., Al-Sabahi, J. N., and Velazhahan, R. (2023). The potential of antagonistic yeasts and bacteria from tomato phyllosphere and fructoplane in the control of Alternaria fruit rot of tomato. All Life 14, 34–48. doi: 10.1080/26895293.2020.1858975

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ashwini, N., and Srividya, S. (2014). Potentiality of Bacillus subtilis as biocontrol agent for management of anthracnose disease of chilli caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides OGC1. Biotech 4, 127–136. doi: 10.1007/s13205-013-0134-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aydi Ben Abdallah, R., Jabnoun-Khiareddine, H., Nefzi, A., Mokni-Tlili, S., and Daami-Remadi, M. (2016). Biocontrol of Fusarium wilt and growth promotion of tomato plants using endophytic bacteria isolated from Solanum elaeagnifolium stems. J. Phytopathol. 164, 811–824. doi: 10.1111/jph.12501

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barghouthi, S. A., Ayyad, I., Ayesh, M., and Abu-Lafi, S. (2017). Isolation, identification, and characterization of the novel antibacterial agent methoxyphenyl-oxime from Streptomyces pratensis QUBC97 isolate. J. Antibiot. Res. 1:105. doi: 10.15744/2574-5980.1.105

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhat, M. Y., Talie, M. D., Wani, A. H., and Lone, B. A. (2020). Chemical composition and antifungal activity of essential oil of Rhizopogon species against fungal rot of apple. J. Appl. Bio. Sci. 14, 296–308.

Google Scholar

Boukaew, S., Prasertsan, P., Troulet, C., and Bardin, M. (2017). Biological control of tomato gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea by using Streptomyces spp. J. BioControl 62, 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10526-017-9825-9829

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cannon, P. F., Damm, U., Johnston, P. R., and Weir, B. S. (2012). Colletotrichum - current status and future directions. Stud. Mycol. 73, 181–213. doi: 10.3114/sim0014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chahal, R., Nanda, A., Akkol, E. K., Sobarzo-Sánchez, E., Arya, A., Kaushik, D., et al. (2021). Ageratum conyzoides L. and its secondary metabolites in the management of different fungal pathogens. Molecules 26:2933. doi: 10.3390/molecules26102933

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cherniienko, A., Pawełczyk, A., and Zaprutko, L. (2022). Antimicrobial and odour qualities of alkylpyrazines occurring in chocolate and cocoa products. Appl. Sci. 12:11361. doi: 10.3390/app122211361

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choub, V., Ajuna, H. B., Won, S. J., Moon, J. H., Choi, S. I., Maung, C. E. H., et al. (2021). Antifungal activity of Bacillus velezensis CE 100 against anthracnose disease (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) and growth promotion of walnut (Juglans regia L.) trees. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:10438. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910438

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choub, V., Won, S. J., Ajuna, H. B., Moon, J. H., Choi, S. I., Lim, H. I., et al. (2022). Antifungal activity of volatile organic compounds from Bacillus velezensis CE 100 against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Horticulturae 8:557. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8060557

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cortazar-Murillo, E. M., Méndez-Bravo, A., Monribot-Villanueva, J. L., Garay-Serrano, E., Kiel-Martínez, A. L., Ramírez-Vázquez, M., et al. (2023). Biocontrol and plant growth promoting traits of two avocado rhizobacteria are orchestrated by the emission of diffusible and volatile compounds. Front. Microbiol. 14:1152597. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1152597

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Clerck, E., Vanhoutte, T., Hebb, T., Geerinck, J., Devos, J., and De Vos, P. (2004). Isolation, characterization, and identification of bacterial contaminants in semifinal gelatin extracts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 3664–3672. doi: 10.1128/aem.70.6.3664-3672.2004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, X. Z., and Cai, M. Y. (2001). Manual for systematic identification of common bacteria. Beijing: Science Press, 364–398.

Google Scholar

Dowling, M., Peres, N., Villani, S., and Schnabel, G. (2020). Managing Colletotrichum on fruit crops: A "complex" challenge. Plant Dis. 104, 2301–2316. doi: 10.1094/pdis-11-19-2378-fe

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elkahoui, S., Djébali, N., Yaich, N., Azaiez, S., Hammami, M., Essid, R., et al. (2015). Antifungal activity of volatile compounds-producing Pseudomonas P2 strain against Rhizoctonia solani. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31, 175–185. doi: 10.1007/s11274-014-1772-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fanning, K. J., Topp, B., Russell, D., Stanley, R., and Netzel, M. (2014). Japanese plums (Prunus salicina Lindl.) and phytochemicals–breeding, horticultural practice, postharvest storage, processing and bioactivity. J. Sci. Food Agric. 94, 2137–2147. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6591

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2018). World production of plums and sloes. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/zh/#data/QC (Accessed August 11, 2023)

Google Scholar

Gfeller, A., Fuchsmann, P., De Vrieze, M., Gindro, K., and Weisskopf, L. (2022). Bacterial volatiles known to inhibit Phytophthora infestans are emitted on potato leaves by Pseudomonas strains. Microorganisms. 10:1510. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10081510

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grahovac, J., Pajčin, I., and Vlajkov, V. (2023). Bacillus VOCs in the context of biological control. Antibiotics (Basel) 12:581. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030581

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guevara-Avendaño, E., Bejarano-Bolívar, A. A., Kiel-Martínez, A. L., Ramírez-Vázquez, M., Méndez-Bravo, A., von Wobeser, E. A., et al. (2019). Avocado rhizobacteria emit volatile organic compounds with antifungal activity against Fusarium solani, Fusarium sp. associated with Kuroshio shot hole borer, and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Microbiol. Res. 219, 74–83. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2018.11.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hassan, O., Lee, Y. S., and Chang, T. (2019). Colletotrichum species associated with Japanese plum (Prunus salicina) anthracnose in South Korea. Sci. Rep. 9:12089. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48108-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hernández Flores, J. L., Martínez, Y. J., Ramos López, M. Á., Saldaña Gutierrez, C., Reyes, A. A., Armendariz Rosales, M. M., et al. (2022). Volatile organic compounds produced by Kosakonia cowanii Cp1 isolated from the seeds of Capsicum pubescens R & P possess antifungal activity. Microorganisms 11:2491. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11102491

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Holt, J. G., Krieg, N. R., Sneath, P. H. A., Staley, J. T., and Williams, S. T. (1994). Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins Press, 195–256.

Google Scholar

Hong, S., Kim, T. Y., Won, S. J., Moon, J. H., Ajuna, H. B., Kim, K. Y., et al. (2022). Control of fungal diseases and fruit yield improvement of strawberry using Bacillus velezensis CE 100. Microorganisms 10:365. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020365

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, J., Dong, B., Wang, D., Meng, H., Li, X., and Zhou, H. (2022). Genomic and metabolic features of Bacillus cereus, inhibiting the growth of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum by synthesizing secondary metabolites. Arch. Microbiol. 205:8. doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-03351-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, R., Gui, Q., Zhang, Y., Sun, W., Tang, L., Huang, S., et al. (2022). Identification and observation of infection processes of Colletotrichum species associated with pearl plum anthracnose in Guangxi, China. Plant Dis. 106, 3154–3165. doi: 10.1094/pdis-04-22-0765-re

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, W., Long, C., and Lam, E. (2018). Roles of plant-associated microbiota in traditional herbal medicine. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 559–562. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, P., Wang, H., Tan, Z., Xuan, Z., Dahar, G. Y., Li, Q. X., et al. (2019). Antifungal mechanism of bacillomycin D from Bacillus velezensis HN-2 against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 163, 102–107. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.11.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kashyap, N., Singh, S. K., Yadav, N., Singh, V. K., Kumari, M., Kumar, D., et al. (2023). Biocontrol screening of endophytes: applications and limitations. Plants (Basel) 12:2480. doi: 10.3390/plants12132480

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Köberl, M., Schmidt, R., Ramadan, E. M., Bauer, R., and Berg, G. (2013). The microbiome of medicinal plants: diversity and importance for plant growth, quality and health. Front. Microbiol. 4:400. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00400

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lei, W., Zhang, H., Zheng, Y., Ke, D., Wang, M., Lin, S., et al. (2023). First report of brown rot caused by Monilia mumecola on Chinese plum (Prunus salicina) in Fujian, China. Plant Dis. 107:2845. doi: 10.1094/pdis-01-23-0127-pdn

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Sui, Y., Wisniewski, M., Droby, S., and Liu, Y. (2013). Review: utilization of antagonistic yeasts to manage postharvest fungal diseases of fruit. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 167, 153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.09.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Sun, W., Chen, X., Huang, S., Tang, L., Guo, T., et al. (2023a). Bacterial leaf spot of plum caused by Sphingomonas spermidinifaciens in Guangxi, China. Plant Dis. 107:2839. doi: 10.1094/pdis-04-23-0685-pdn

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Sun, W., Chen, X., Huang, S., Tang, L., Guo, T., et al. (2023b). Leaf spot of sanhua plum caused by Botryosphaeria wangensis in China. Plant Dis. 107:2888. doi: 10.1094/pdis-12-22-2960-pdn

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Long, H., Yin, X., Zhao, Z., Long, Y., Fan, J., Shu, R., et al. (2021). First report of fruit blotch on plum caused by Fusarium fujikuroi in China. Plant Dis. 105:2256. doi: 10.1094/pdis-08-20-1784-pdn

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, M., Ma, L., Tang, L., Chen, X., Guo, T., Mo, J., et al. (2022a). First report of anthracnose of sanhua plum caused by Colletotrichum aeschynomenes in Guangxi, China. Plant Dis. 107:1223. doi: 10.1094/pdis-05-22-1172-pdn

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, M., Zhang, Y., Li, Q., Huang, S., Tang, L., Chen, X., et al. (2022b). First report of leaf blight caused by Fusarium pernambucanum and Fusarium sulawesiense on plum in Sichuan, China. Plant Dis. 106:2759. doi: 10.1094/pdis-12-21-2672-pdn

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mehmood, N., Saeed, M., Zafarullah, S., Hyder, S., Rizvi, Z. F., Gondal, A. S., et al. (2023). Multifaceted impacts of plant-beneficial Pseudomonas spp. in managing various plant diseases and crop yield improvement. ACS Omega 8, 22296–22315. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00870

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Momin, M. D., and Ibrahim, K. S. (2020). Endophytic bacteria isolated from Ageratum conyzoides L. and Mikania micrantha Kunth of Mizoram, Northeast India. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 44, 355–358. doi: 10.1007/s40009-020-01013-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morita, T., Tanaka, I., Ryuda, N., Ikari, M., Ueno, D., and Someya, T. (2019). Antifungal spectrum characterization and identification of strong volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus pumilus TM-R. Heliyon 5:e01817. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01817

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Radhakrishnan, R., Hashem, A., and Abd Allah, E. F. (2017). Bacillus: A biological tool for crop improvement through bio-molecular changes in adverse environments. Front. Physiol. 8:667. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00667

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roberts, M. S., Nakamura, L. K., and Cohan, F. M. (1994). Bacillus mojavensis sp. nov., distinguishable from Bacillus subtilis by sexual isolation, divergence in DNA sequence, and differences in fatty acid composition. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 44, 256–264. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-2-256

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Cisneros, M., Morales-Ruíz, L. M., Salazar-Gómez, A., Rojas-Rojas, F. U., and Santos, E.-d. L. (2023). Compilation of the antimicrobial compounds produced by Burkholderia Sensu Stricto. Molecules 28:1646. doi: 10.3390/molecules28041646

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roussos, P. A. (2016). Nutritional composition of fruit cultivars plum. (Prunus domestica L. and P. salicina Lindl.). J. Appl. Bio. Sci. 3, 639–666. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-408117-8.00026-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ryu, H., Park, H., Suh, D. S., Jung, G. H., Park, K., and Lee, B. D. (2014). Biological control of Colletotrichum panacicola on Panax ginseng by Bacillus subtilis HK-CSM-1. J. Ginseng Res. 38, 215–219. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2014.05.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shu, R., Yin, X., Long, Y., Yuan, J., and Zhou, H. (2022). Detection and control of Pantoea agglomerans causing plum bacterial shot-hole disease by loop-mediated isothermal amplification technique. Front. Microbiol. 13:896567. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.896567

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shurigin, V., Alaylar, B., Davranov, K., Wirth, S., Bellingrath-Kimura, S. D., and Egamberdieva, D. (2021). Diversity and biological activity of culturable endophytic bacteria associated with marigold (Calendula officinalis L.). AIMS Microbiol. 7, 336–353. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sidorova, D. E., Khmel, I. A., Chernikova, A. S., Chupriyanova, T. A., and Plyuta, V. A. (2023). Biological activity of volatiles produced by the strains of two Pseudomonas and two Serratia species. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 68, 617–626. doi: 10.1007/s12223-023-01038-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Soo, K. Y., Younmi, L., Wonsu, C., Jungwook, P., Tae, K. H., Kotnala, B., et al. (2021). Characterization of Bacillus velezensis AK-0 as a biocontrol agent against apple bitter rot caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Sci. Rep. 11:626. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80231-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Surovy, M. Z., Rahman, S., Rostás, M., Islam, T., and von Tiedemann, A. (2023). Suppressive effects of volatile vompounds from Bacillus spp. on Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum (MoT) pathotype, causal agent of wheat blast. Microorganisms 11:1291. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11051291

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tang, Q. Y., and Zhang, C. X. (2013). Data processing system (DPS) software with experimental design, statistical analysis and data mining developed for use in entomological research. Insect Sci. 20, 254–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01519.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tripathi, A., Pandey, P., Tripathi, S. N., and Kalra, A. (2022). Perspectives and potential applications of endophytic microorganisms in cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants. Front. Plant Sci. 13:985429. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.985429

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tyc, O., Song, C., Dickschat, J. S., Vos, M., and Garbeva, P. (2016). The ecological role of volatile and soluble secondary metabolites produced by soil bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 25, 280–292. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Q. H., Fan, K., Li, D. W., Han, C. M., Qu, Y. Y., Qi, Y. K., et al. (2020). Identification, virulence and fungicide sensitivity of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides s.s. responsible for walnut anthracnose disease in China. Plant Dis. 104, 1358–1368. doi: 10.1094/pdis-12-19-2569-re

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H. Y., Li, C. Y., Song, F. J., Lin, A. H., and Meng, Y. Y. (2021). Isolation and identification of an endophytic bacterium from Bletilla striata and preliminary study of antibacterial mechanism. J. South Cent. Univ. Natl. Nat. Sci. Ed. 40, 246–251. doi: 10.12130/znmdzk.20210305

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Wei, Y., and Huang, Y. J. (2013). Morganella morganii as a causative agent of disease in the Chinese Giant salamander (Andrias davidianus). Asian Herpetol. Res. 4, 197–201. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1245.2013.00197

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Zhong, T., Chen, K., Du, M., and Kan, J. (2020). Antifungal activity of volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens ZX and potential biocontrol of blue mold decay on postharvest citrus. Food Control 120:107499. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107499

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, X., Shen, F., Zhang, Q., Liu, N., Zhang, Y., Xu, M., et al. (2021). Genetic diversity analysis of Chinese plum (Prunus salicina L.) based on whole-genome resequencing tree genet. Genomes 17, 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s11295-021-01506-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wen, K., Chen, X. X., Zhou, X., Huang, S. J., Liu, Y. H., Jin, J. H., et al. (2023). Phytophthora nicotianae: a new threat to Sanhua plum (Prunus salicina) causing shoot blight in China. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 166, 329–339. doi: 10.1007/s10658-023-02665-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wicaksono, W. A., Jones, E. E., Casonato, S., Monk, J., and Ridgway, H. J. (2018). Biological control of Pseudomonas syringae pv. Actinidiae (Psa), the causal agent of bacterial canker of kiwifruit, using endophytic bacteria recovered from a medicinal plant. Biol. Control 116, 103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.03.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, W., Chen, F., Yeh, K., and Chen, J. (2018). ISSR analysis of genetic diversity and structure of plum varieties cultivated in southern China. Biology (Basel) 8:2. doi: 10.3390/biology8010002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, F., Tong, X. Q., Zhang, L. Q., Mei, L., Guo, Y. B., and Wang, Y. J. (2020). Suppression of Rhizopus fruit rot by volatile organic compounds produced by Paenibacillus polymyxa CF05. Biomed. Sci. Technol. 30, 1351–1364. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2020.1826902

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xing, M., Zheng, L., Deng, Y., Xu, D., Xim, P., Li, M., et al. (2018). Antifungal activity of natural volatile organic compounds against litchi downy blight pathogen Peronophythora litchii. Molecules 23:358. doi: 10.3390/molecules23020358

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, J. X., Li, Z. Y., Lv, X., Yan, H., Zhou, G. Y., Cao, L. X., et al. (2020). Isolation and characterization of Bacillus subtilis strain 1-L-29, an endophytic bacteria from Camellia oleifera with antimicrobial activity and efficient plant-root colonization. PLoS One 15:e0232096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232096

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yamamoto, S., and Harayama, S. (1995). PCR amplification and firect sequencing of gyrB genes with universal primers and their application to the detection and taxonomic analysis of Pseudomonas putida strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:3768. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.10.3768-3768.1995

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, J., Raza, W., Shen, Q., and Huang, Q. (2012). Antifungal activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NJN-6 volatile compounds against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.cubense. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 5942–5944. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01357-12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Z. Z., Li, Y. B., Qi, L., and Wan, X. C. (2006). Antifungal activities of major tea leaf volatile constituents toward Colletorichum camelliae massea. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 3936–3940. doi: 10.1021/jf060017m

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Li, T., Xu, M., Guo, J., Zhang, C., Feng, Z., et al. (2021). Antifungal effect of volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aureofaciens SPS-41 on oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction of Ceratocystis fimbriata. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 173:104777. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2021.104777

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, D., Qiang, R., Zhao, J., Zhang, J., Cheng, J., Zhao, D., et al. (2022). Mechanism of a volatile organic compound (6-Methyl-2-Heptanone) emitted from Bacillus subtilis ZD01 against Alternaria solani in potato. Front. Microbiol. 12:808337. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.808337

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, M., Shi, J., Shi, J., Wang, Q., and Li, Y. (2013). Antimicrobial effects of volatiles produced by two antagonistic Bacillus strains on the anthracnose pathogen in postharvest mangos. Biol. Control 65, 200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.02.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, A., Wang, F., Yin, J., Peng, R., Deng, J., Shen, D., et al. (2022). Antifungal action and induction of resistance by Bacillus sp. strain YYC 155 against Colletotrichum fructicola for control of anthracnose disease in Camellia oleifera. Front. Microbiol. 13:956642. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.956642

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, J., Xie, Y., Liao, Y., Li, X., Li, Y., Li, S., et al. (2022). Characterization of a Bacillus velezensis strain isolated from Bolbostemmatis Rhizoma displaying strong antagonistic activities against a variety of rice pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 13:983781. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.983781

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Bacillus, biocontrol, antagonistic activity, plum, Colletotrichum, volatile

Citation: Chen X, Zhang M, Tang L, Huang S, Guo T and Li Q (2023) Screening and characterization of biocontrol bacteria isolated from Ageratum conyzoides against Collectotrichum fructicola causing Chinese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) anthracnose. Front. Microbiol. 14:1296755. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1296755

Received: 19 September 2023; Accepted: 16 November 2023;
Published: 07 December 2023.

Edited by:

Renátó Kovács, University of Debrecen, Hungary

Reviewed by:

Evans N. Nyaboga, University of Nairobi, Kenya
Mohamed Mannaa, Cairo University, Egypt

Copyright © 2023 Chen, Zhang, Tang, Huang, Guo and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Qili Li, NjU2MTUzODRAcXEuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.