Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 29 September 2023
Sec. Infectious Agents and Disease

Shifts in the swine nasal microbiota following Bordetella bronchiseptica challenge in a longitudinal study

  • 1National Animal Disease Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA, United States
  • 2Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), Oak Ridge, TN, United States

Bordetella bronchiseptica is a widespread, highly infectious bacterial pathogen that causes respiratory disease in swine and increases the severity of respiratory infections caused by other viral or bacterial pathogens. However, the impact of B. bronchiseptica infection on the swine respiratory microbiota has not been thoroughly investigated. Here, we aim to assess the influence of B. bronchiseptica infection on the community structure and abundance of members of the swine nasal microbiota. To do so, the nasal microbiota of a non-infected control group and a group infected with B. bronchiseptica (BB group) were characterized prior to B. bronchiseptica strain KM22 challenge (day 0) and on selected days in the weeks following B. bronchiseptica challenge (days 1, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 36, and 42). Bordetella bronchiseptica was cultured from nasal samples of the BB group to assess nasal colonization. The results showed that B. bronchiseptica colonization did not persistently affect the nasal bacterial diversity of either of the treatment groups (alpha diversity). However, the bacterial community structures (beta diversity) of the two treatment groups significantly diverged on day 7 when peak colonization levels of B. bronchiseptica were detected. This divergence continued through the last sampling time point. In addition, Pasteurella, Pasteurellaceae (unclassified), Mycoplasma, Actinobacillus, Streptococcus, Escherichia-Shigella, and Prevotellaceae (unclassified) showed increased abundances in the BB group relative to the control group at various time points. This study revealed that B. bronchiseptica colonization can disturb the upper respiratory tract microbiota, and further research is warranted to assess how these disturbances can impact susceptibility to secondary infections by other respiratory pathogens.

Introduction

Bordetella bronchiseptica is one of the several bacterial respiratory pathogens that is associated with the costly multifactorial swine respiratory syndrome, porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC) (Opriessnig et al., 2011). This organism is highly prevalent in swine and is commonly recovered from swine respiratory tracts (Brockmeier et al., 2012). Bordetella bronchiseptica colonizes the nasal cavity, trachea, and lung and is easily transmitted by direct contact or aerosol droplets. The bacteria cause pneumonia and atrophic rhinitis with clinical signs typically appearing 2–3 days after infection (Brockmeier et al., 2012). Clinical signs are more severe depending on age, immune status, and coinfection with other agents (Brockmeier et al., 2012). Although clinical signs may abate several weeks following initial infection, B. bronchiseptica may continue to colonize for months (Brockmeier et al., 2012).

Bordetella bronchiseptica also plays an important role in enhancing colonization and disease of important bacterial agents such as Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Glaesserella parasuis, Pasteurella multocida, and Streptococcus suis, which are pathogens, potential pathogens, or pathobionts associated with PRDC (Harris and Switzer, 1968; Vecht et al., 1989, 1992; Dugal et al., 1992; Brockmeier et al., 2001; Brockmeier, 2004; Brockmeier and Register, 2007; Loera-Muro et al., 2016). Bordetella bronchiseptica predisposes animals to disease by S. suis (Vecht et al., 1989, 1992), allows P. multocida to colonize and contribute to disease (Harris and Switzer, 1968; Dugal et al., 1992; Brockmeier et al., 2001; Brockmeier and Register, 2007), promotes colonization of the upper respiratory tract (URT) with G. parasuis (Brockmeier, 2004), and, as shown in in vitro biofilm assays, may provide a niche environment for A. pleuropneumoniae to survive in the host URT (Loera-Muro et al., 2016).

In pigs, the composition and diversity of the respiratory tract microbiome may be important in preventing PRDC (Niederwerder, 2017; Pirolo et al., 2023). The URT microbiome is of particular interest as the URT is a primary reservoir for pathogens that reach the lungs (Pirolo et al., 2023). Differences in the microbial community of the URT have been identified for animals displaying clinical PRDC when compared with healthy counterparts, including differences in beta diversity measures and the prevalence of genera containing respiratory pathogens such as Pasteurellaceae (unclassified), Actinobacillus, and Streptococcus (Rampelotto et al., 2022). Changes in the microbial community of the URT have also been indicated for certain PRDC bacterial agents as low species richness and diversity in the URT have been associated with the development of Glässer's disease (Correa-Fiz et al., 2016). The composition and diversity of the URT microbiota may also be impacted by B. bronchiseptica infection; however, the relationship between B. bronchiseptica and the swine URT microbial population has not been thoroughly investigated. When defining the normal inhabitants of the URT, Pirolo et al. (2023) found that the genus Bordetella was more abundant in the posterior nasal cavity compared with the tonsils of swine, while S. suis was more abundant in the tonsils (Pirolo et al., 2023). In mice, B. bronchiseptica (strain RB50) has also been shown to displace the culturable host microbiota from the nasal cavity (Weyrich et al., 2014).

The findings of previous studies led us to hypothesize that infection with B. bronchiseptica could disturb the equilibrium of the microbiota of the nasal cavity and may influence the abundance of genera associated with PRDC. In this study, we characterized and compared the nasal microbiota of pigs inoculated with B. bronchiseptica with non-inoculated pigs over a 42-day period using 16S rRNA sequencing. We identified a divergence in the nasal microbiota communities during B. bronchiseptica infection starting on day 7 compared with the control group (beta diversity). No consistent changes were noted within the two groups (alpha diversity). Genera associated with PRDC showed significant differences in abundance when B. bronchiseptica colonization levels either peaked or declined.

Materials and methods

Animal study design and sample collection

Twenty weaned, unvaccinated, 3-week-old, crossbred pigs were acquired. Pigs were randomly distributed into two ABSL2 rooms with 10 pigs in each room. Pigs were acclimated 12 days prior to the beginning of the study. Nasal swabs were collected from all pigs prior to the start of the study to ensure the absence of B. bronchiseptica. On day 0 of the experiment, pigs in the B. bronchiseptica (BB) group were inoculated intranasally with 1 ml (0.5 ml/nostril) PBS containing 106 colony forming units (CFU)/ml of B. bronchiseptica strain KM22 (Nicholson et al., 2012). The second group of pigs (control group) were not inoculated with KM22, but they were sham inoculated with 2 ml (1 ml per nostril) of PBS. All pigs were evaluated daily for the presence of clinical signs of respiratory disease. The nasal cavity of all pigs was sampled on day 0 prior to inoculation and on the following days after inoculation: 1, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 36, and 42. On day 42, all pigs were humanely euthanized and necropsied to assess gross lesions.

Samples of the nasal microbiota were obtained via nasal wash followed by nasal swabbing. Sterile PBS (5 ml) was applied via a syringe into the nostrils, and effluent PBS was collected. FLOQSwabs (Copan Flock Technologies, Murrieta, CA) were inserted into each nostril and placed in the collected nasal wash. Nasal samples were vortexed, and the nasal swab was removed prior to centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was decanted, and the pellet was resuspended in 200 μl of PBS. Samples were stored in a 96-well plate at −80°C for subsequent DNA extraction.

Bordetella bronchiseptica colonization was determined by plating serial 10-fold dilutions of post-challenge (days 1, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 36, and 42) nasal wash on selective blood agar plates containing 20 μg/ml penicillin, 10 μg/ml amphotericin B, 10 μg/ml streptomycin, and 10 μg/ml spectinomycin (Brockmeier et al., 2002; Brockmeier, 2004; Nicholson et al., 2009). Plates were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 2 days and were subsequently enumerated for bacterial quantification. The log10 CFUs were plotted using GraphPad Prism (Dotmatics, San Diego, CA).

DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing

Bacterial DNA from nasal samples was extracted using the PowerMag Microbiome DNA/RNA Isolation Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the epMotion 5075 workstation (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), following the manufacturer's instructions. DNA concentration was assessed with the Quant-IT PicoGreen dsDNA Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). All samples were processed through the MiSeq Wet Lab SOP to prepare the hypervariable V4 region of 16S rRNA gene sequences for Illumina MiSeq sequencing (Kozich et al., 2013): https://github.com/SchlossLab/MiSeq_WetLab_SOP/blob/master/MiSeq_WetLab_SOP.md. Mock community and negative extraction controls were also included for sequencing (Allen et al., 2016). Once samples were processed, pooled, and normalized to at least 1 nM, they were submitted to the NADC Genomics Facility in Ames, IA for preparation of 250 bp paired-end library and sequencing on the MiSeq instrument (Illumina, Inc. San Diego, CA) using version 2 chemistry.

Sequence processing and taxonomy assignment

Raw FASTQ data were retrieved from the MiSeq platform and processed using mothur (version 1.48.0) and MiSeq SOP (https://mothur.org/wiki/miseq_sop/, accessed 12/13/2022). Sequences were assigned taxonomies with the SILVA release 132 database (https://www.arb-silva.de/) and identified a total of 1,889 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). After processing sequences and subsampling samples to 7,395 sequences with mothur, there were 1,636 OTUs. The number of samples per day is presented in Table 1. Two samples were excluded due to poor sequencing depth, and two samples were inadvertently contaminated during sample collection.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Nasal samples from each treatment group and time point used in the analyses.

Nasal microbiota data and statistical analyses

Data analysis and figure generation were conducted using R version 4.1.2 (R Core Team, 2021). The R packages ggplot2 (Wickham et al., 2016) and cowplot (Wilke et al., 2019) were used to visualize data. The R packages such as vegan (Oksanen et al., 2022), phyloseq (McMurdie and Holmes, 2013), philentropy (Drost, 2018), and tidyverse (Wickham et al., 2019) were used to analyze various alpha (Shannon and Inverse Simpson) and beta (Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrices based on OTU abundances) diversity measures of the samples from each treatment group (BB and control) and day. To assess for any significant differences in alpha and beta diversities between treatment groups on a given day (p ≤ 0.05), Wilcoxon rank-sum test and permutational multivariate analysis of variance using distance matrices (adonis) function (Oksanen et al., 2007) were conducted on the paired data, respectively. The average number of distinct OTUs per day for each treatment was calculated, and a two-way ANOVA was performed using GraphPad Prism.

Raw data (non-subsampled data with singletons removed) were filtered to remove samples that had fewer than 7,394 sequences and OTUs that occurred <10 times globally. To identify differentially abundant OTUs between the groups, the DESeq2 package version 1.34.0 (Anders and Huber, 2010; Love et al., 2014) (open source, www.bioconductor.org) was used. OTUs were combined at the genus level, and the Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment was used to limit the false discovery rate of contrasts. The significance of the log2-fold change of comparisons was determined using the Wald test and a cutoff of p ≤ 0.05. OTUs that were differentially abundant (log2-fold changes with adjusted p-values ≤ 0.05) and showed no significant differences between the two groups on day 0 were selected for further study. Genera associated with porcine respiratory disease complex were also examined even if they were significantly different on day 0, to observe if changes in abundance occurred.

Results

Bordetella bronchiseptica colonization

After the challenge, animals were monitored for clinical signs of B. bronchiseptica infection twice daily. No animals developed respiratory clinical signs. One animal had a 1 cm consolidated patch in the left middle lung lobe consistent with B. bronchiseptica bronchopneumonia at necropsy on day 42. Colonization of B. bronchiseptica was detected in all pigs of the BB group on day 1. Average colonization peaked on days 3 and 7 at 5.74 × 105 and 2.86 × 105 log10 CFU/ml, respectively (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Colony forming units (CFUs) of Bordetella bronchiseptica quantified from the BB group on a log10 scale (y-axis) for each sampling day (x-axis) post-challenge. Each gray circle represents a different animal sample. The mean and 95% confidence intervals are represented by the black bars.

Community and diversity changes in the nasal microbiota after Bordetella bronchiseptica infection

Community richness was compared between the control and the B. bronchiseptica (BB) groups, and no significant and persistent changes were observed in the study. The Shannon diversity index demonstrated statistical significance only on day 0 (p = 0.029; Figure 2A, Supplementary Table S1). However, this difference was not observed in the inverse Simpson diversity index (Figure 2B, Supplementary Table S1). The inverse Simpson diversity index demonstrated a significant difference between the control and BB groups on day 14 (p = 0.035) (Figure 2B, Supplementary Table S1). When the mean number of distinct OTUs per day for each treatment group was calculated, no statistical significance was observed between the BB and control groups (Supplementary Figure S1). However, there was an upward trend toward a higher number of distinct OTUs per sample as the study progressed.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Alpha diversity comparisons between the BB and control groups. BB (red) had significantly different (*) Shannon diversity relative to control (blue) only on day 0 (D0) relative to the control (blue) (A). Significant differences in inverse Simpson diversity relative to control (blue) were observed only on day 14 (D14) (B). Pairwise comparisons within groups across time and between groups at each time point were performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test at a significance level of 0.05 (p ≤ 0.05*).

To assess the changes in the bacterial community structure between BB and control groups on a given day, a PERMANOVA pairwise comparison test was performed using the treatment-by-day variable using metaMDS from the vegan package (Supplementary Figure S2). In addition, the PERMANOVA F-statistic was plotted against time to assess the magnitude of change in the community structure of BB relative to control (Figure 3). After the challenge, no significant changes were observed on days 1 and 3 for the BB group when compared with the control group. However, significant changes were observed on the other sampling days 7–42 (Figure 3). On day 7, the F-statistic rose to 5.47, and it peaked on day 14 (5.87). The nasal microbial communities are presented in Figure 4, which depicts the relative abundance of genera present in the nasal cavity by treatment and day. The changes from days 7 to 42 suggest that the nasal bacterial community remains dissimilar from the control group persistently (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. PERMANOVA F-statistic of nasal bacterial community analysis of the BB group relative to the control group over the 42-day period. Each point represents the PERMANOVA test statistic (F: intergroup dissimilarity/intragroup dissimilarity) of the BB group over time (days 0 to 42), with control group set as 0 at the baseline. p-values are contained within the text boxes; days 7–42 are considered statistically significant.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Relative abundances of nasal bacterial genera over the 42-day period between the BB and control groups. Within each day (day numbers listed at the top of the bar plots), each bar plot shows the percentages of total genera found in each group. Only genera with more than 1% abundance are shown. Genera with <1% abundance are grouped in the “Other” category.

Variables such as treatment, day, and treatment by day were examined with the adonis function to determine the level each variable contributed to the observed shifts in the nasal community between the BB and control groups (Table 2). The treatment, day, and treatment-by-day variables exhibited significantly strong effects (p ≤ 0.0001). The day of sampling was the strongest contributor to the variation observed in the nasal microbial community between the two groups as the day variable had the largest R-square value (R2 = 0.367), followed by treatment by day (R2 = 0.075) and finally treatment (R2 = 0.028). Therefore, treatment was significant, but time appeared to have the greatest impact.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Impact of treatment, day, and treatment by day on microbiome changes.

Genera in the nasal cavity that were differentially abundant in response to B. bronchiseptica colonization

Between the BB and control groups, 147 genera representing 150 OTUs were differentially abundant across the time course of the study when the 49 genera different on day 0 were excluded. Although there were 196 differentially expressed genera (Supplementary Table S2), only 37 genera had >1% relative abundance per day over the course of the study (Figure 4). As expected, Bordetella was differentially more abundant in the BB group than in the control group (Figures 4, 5A, B). However, no other genera were persistently differentially abundant for the following days 1, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 36, and 42 when the BB group and control group were compared (data not shown). No consistent genera changes were noted, suggesting that differences in community structure were associated with differential abundances of genera between the groups on different days.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Differential abundances of genera in the respiratory tract between the BB and control groups. Genera with significant increased abundances between the treatment groups, BB (red) and control (blue), during peak Bordetella colonization, days 3 and 7 (A). X-axis represents the day, y-axis displays the log2-fold changes of the genera, and the corresponding genus is listed above each panel. Genera with significant increased abundances between treatment groups, BB (red) and control (blue), associated with PRDC (B), even if statistically significant abundances are present on day 0.

Although differentially abundant for the entire study between the BB and control groups, the genus Bordetella comprised >1% of the BB group only on the days associated with peak colonization, days 3 and 7 (2.57 and 4.78%, respectively; shown in Figures 1, 4). In addition to Bordetella, other bacterial genera were also differentially abundant on days 3 and 7. Escherichia-Shigella, Pasteurellaceae (unclassified), and Prevotellaceae (unclassified) were more abundant in the BB group compared with the control. Alternatively, Catenisphaera, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Collinsella, Erysipelotrichaceae (unclassified), Mogibacterium, Negativibacillus, Romboutsia, Succiniclasticum, Succinivibrio, and Terrisporobacter showed increased abundance in the control group compared with the BB group (Figure 5A; Supplementary Table S2).

Interestingly, certain genera showed increased abundances later in the study. On days 14–42, Micrococcaceae (unclassified), Pseudochrobactrum, and Stenotrophomonas showed increased abundance in the BB group compared with the control group (Supplementary Table S2). On days 10–36, Enterorhabdus showed increased abundance in the control group compared with the BB group; however, this trend was not observed on day 42 (Supplementary Table S2).

PRDC-associated genera that were differentially abundant in response to B. bronchiseptica colonization

When the abundances of genera associated with PRDC were examined, Actinobacillus and Mycoplasma were significantly more abundant in the BB group than in the control group on day 36 (Figure 5B). Pasteurella was significantly more abundant in the BB group than in the control group on day 14 (Figure 5B). OTUs identified as Pasteurellaceae (unclassified), which may encompass G. parasuis, were significantly more abundant in the BB group on days 3 and 7. The differential abundance of Pasteurellaceae (unclassified) corresponded to the peak colonization of B. bronchiseptica (Figures 1, 5B). Although the Streptococcus genus was significantly more abundant on day 0 for the BB group compared with the control group, Streptococcus was not statistically different on days 1 and 3, but the genus peaked on day 7 for the BB group (Figure 5B). There were no significant differences observed for Trueperella or Salmonella.

Discussion

Bordetella bronchiseptica is a primary respiratory pathogen of pigs that is known to impact the severity of respiratory infection by increasing inflammation and enhancing colonization with other bacteria that contribute to PRDC (Opriessnig et al., 2011; Brockmeier et al., 2012). Though many studies have investigated B. bronchiseptica monoinfection and coinfections (Brockmeier, 2004; Nicholson et al., 2009, 2012), a few studies have been conducted evaluating the impact of B. bronchiseptica on the URT microbiota. There is evidence to indicate that B. bronchiseptica infection could disrupt the normal microbiota as it has been shown to enhance colonization with other bacterial respiratory pathogens in pigs and displace the culturable microbiota in the nasal cavity of mice (Brockmeier, 2004; Opriessnig et al., 2011; Weyrich et al., 2014). This current study was a longitudinal evaluation of the nasal microbiota of pigs following B. bronchiseptica infection to assess the changes B. bronchiseptica causes to the nasal microbiota and increase our understanding of bacterial interactions in the nasal cavity that may contribute to increases in secondary bacterial infections.

In this study, we observed that B. bronchiseptica colonization peaked on days 3 and 7, and the bacteria were detected at the end of the study (day 42). These results correspond to previous studies, which found that B. bronchiseptica strain KM22 colonization peaked in the nasal cavity on day 7 post-infection in swine and remained detectable until the end of that study on day 57 (Nicholson et al., 2012). In contrast to previous studies on B. bronchiseptica (Nicholson et al., 2009, 2012), we did not observe clinical signs, and minimal lesions were detected at necropsy on day 42. The differences in clinical disease and lesion severity may be due to weaning age and the age of inoculation. In this study, we used animals weaned at 3 weeks of age and inoculated them at ~5 weeks of age. In traditional B. bronchiseptica studies, pigs are early weaned and inoculated ~1 week of age (Nicholson et al., 2009, 2012), which enhances the severity of B. bronchiseptica disease. However, pigs can be exposed at weaning when co-mingled, which is consistent with the model used in this study (Brockmeier et al., 2012). The microbiota evaluation found that the challenge with B. bronchiseptica did not result in a significant reduction of unique OTUs and caused no persistent changes in richness as indicated by Shannon and Inverse Simpson diversity indices. This was similar to the findings by Rampelotto et al. (2022), where no differences were found in alpha diversity between pigs showing signs of PRDC and asymptomatic animals, although PRDC was defined clinically, and causative agents were not identified. In contrast to our findings, Correa-Fiz et al. (2016) found significant differences in the Shannon diversity index between farms with Glässer's disease compared with healthy farms. However, their study was observational among different farms and investigated G. parasuis, a different etiological agent of PRDC.

Interestingly, B. bronchiseptica challenge resulted in persistent changes in the nasal bacterial community structure from days 7 to 42 as indicated by beta diversity (Bray–Curtis) measurements, suggesting that the nasal bacterial community was unable to recover following the introduction of B. bronchiseptica. Previous studies have examined the relationship between species of clinical interest and B. bronchiseptica through various approaches. Brockmeier (2004) found that B. bronchiseptica increased colonization of the upper respiratory tract with G. parasuis. Votsch et al. (2021) found that pre-infection with B. bronchiseptica promoted adherence and colonization by S. suis in a porcine precision-cut long slice model. Zhao et al. (2011) found that B. bronchiseptica was isolated from 18.6% of porcine lung samples collected over a 6-year period from provinces in central and eastern China, and S. suis, G. parasuis, and Escherichia coli were isolated most frequently in association with B. bronchiseptica (Zhao et al., 2011). Previous studies have also found that pigs infected with B. bronchiseptica may be more vulnerable to colonization by P. multocida (Chanter et al., 1989; Brockmeier et al., 2001). Although not species-specific, our study concurs with previous studies, as we observed increases in the abundance of Streptococcus (day 7), Escherichia-Shigella (days 3 and 7), Pasteurella (day 14), and Pasteurellaceae (unclassified), which would likely encompass the genus Glaesserella (days 3 and 7), for the BB group compared with the control group during peak colonization.

Rampelotto et al. (2022) also found significant differences in beta diversity between the URT of symptomatic and asymptomatic pigs of respiratory disease at weaning and end of the nursery phases (Rampelotto et al., 2022). Actinobacillus, Streptococcus, Porphyromonas, Veillonella, and Pasteurellaceae (unclassified) were more abundant in pigs with clinical signs at weaning and end of the nursery phases compared with pigs without clinical signs (Rampelotto et al., 2022). Mycoplasma was prevalent in both symptomatic and asymptomatic pigs at weaning, but Rampelotto et al. (2022) observed lower abundance at later time points. In this study, we also found differences in the abundance in several of these genera as Actinobacillus (day 36), Streptococcus (days 0 and 7), and Pasteurellaceae (unclassified; days 3 and 7) were significantly more abundant in the BB group than in the control group (Supplementary Table S2 and Figure 5B). We also found that Mycoplasma (day 36) was significantly more abundant in the BB group than in the control group (Supplementary Table S2 and Figure 5B). However, this study did not find consistent results for the genus Veillonella among the BB and control groups (Supplementary Table S2). A Previous study by Correa-Fiz et al. (2016) found that Actinobacillus, Corynebacteria, Planobacterium, Pseudoflavonifractor, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Haemophilus (which would include Glaesserella, a member of the Pasteurellaceae family), Kingella, Moraxella, and Mycoplasma were more abundant in diseased animals from a farm with Glässer's disease (caused by G. parasuis) (Correa-Fiz et al., 2016). Although our current study focused on the challenge with B. bronchiseptica, Actinobacillus (day 36), Corynebacterium 1 (days 0, 7, 10, 14, 21, 36, and 42), Staphylococcus (days 21 and 36), Streptococcus (days 0 and 7), Pasteurellaceae (unclassified; days 3 and 7), and Mycoplasma (day 36) were significantly more abundant in the BB group than in the control group (Supplementary Table S2 and Figure 5B). Combined with previous studies, our results suggest that Actinobacillus, Streptococcus, and Pasteurellaceae (unclassified) may be more abundant in the nasal cavity when swine are infected with PRDC pathogens, which may contribute to complicated respiratory infections and/or the development of systemic disease.

In this study, we analyzed the data using OTUs instead of ASVs. However, previous studies observed that a high correlation was observed when using ASVs and OTUs for alpha diversity (Shannon) and beta diversity (Bray–Curtis) measurements (Chiarello et al., 2022), indicating that the impact of using OTUs instead of ASVs may be minimal. Additionally, we acknowledge that ASVs might have provided additional resolution to the species level, but species-level resolution presents additional challenges. For example, species-level resolution may not be adequate to determine whether any isolate of a species will result in disease or death of a host as intraspecies differences occur (MacInnes and Desrosiers, 1999; Brockmeier et al., 2014).

In conclusion, this study observed a significant change in the composition of the swine nasal microbial community between the BB and control groups beginning on day 7 and continuing through the last sampling time point. After the challenge, there were also significant changes observed in the abundance of nasal genera that can be attributed to the changing colonization levels of B. bronchiseptica in the BB group. Notably, we observed Pasteurellaceae (unclassified) was more abundant in the BB group than in the control group on days 3 and 7, during peak Bordetella colonization. The significance of these changes is unknown, highlighting the need for further investigation into the effect of such disturbances on the protective role of the URT microbiota and swine respiratory health.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, PRJNA525911.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by National Animal Disease Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

DN: Methodology, Data curation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. SH: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. KM: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—review and editing. DA: Investigation, Methodology, Writing—review and editing. SB: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing—review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the animal caretakers at the NADC, Maya Weiss, and Ursula Waack for their assistance with animal studies. The authors are grateful to Jennifer Chang and Damarius S. Fleming for computational support and Heather Allen, Julian Trachsel, and Jennifer Jones for useful discussions. This research was supported in part by an appointment to the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) Research Participation Program administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). ORISE is managed by ORAU under DOE contract number DE-SC0014664.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Author disclaimer

All opinions expressed in this study are the author and do not necessarily reflect the policies and views of USDA, ARS, DOE, or ORAU/ORISE. The trade names or commercial products mentioned in this publication are solely for the purpose of providing specific information and do not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1260465/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Table S1. Pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test between the BB and control groups on each day for the alpha diversity values (Shannon and Inverse Simpson; p ≤ 0.05*).

Supplementary Table S2. Relative log-fold changes of differentially abundant OTUs. Relative log-fold changes and corresponding operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were significantly and differentially abundant between the BB and control groups on any day as identified by the Wald test with a parametric fit in DESeq and Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment (padj).

Supplementary Figure S1. Mean number of distinct OTUs for each sample (y-axis) by day (x-axis) for the BB (red) and control (blue) groups. No statistical differences between the BB and control groups were found at any time point.

Supplementary Figure S2. Significant changes in the nasal microbial composition between the control and BB groups were observed on days 7, 10, 14, 21, 36, and 42. This non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination is another way of visualizing the data underlying the PERMANOVA results and is generated using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity metric calculated with rarefied OTU abundance data (k = 2, stress = 0.169). The plot is split into nine treatment-by-day panels. The labels at the top of each panel refer to the day sampled. Day 0 samples were collected before the animals in the BB group were challenged. Each point represents one sample. The closer the samples are to each other, the more similar the microbial compositions of the samples are. Samples are linked to the treatment group centroid by segments, and the standard error of the treatment group is depicted with an ellipse. Within each day, the two groups are as follows: BB (red) and control (blue).

Abbreviations

BB, Bordetella bronchiseptica; CFUs, colony forming units; PBS, phosphate buffer saline; PRDC, porcine respiratory disease complex; URT, upper respiratory tract.

References

Allen, H. K., Bayles, D. O., Looft, T., Trachsel, J., Bass, B. E., Alt, D. P., et al. (2016). Pipeline for amplifying and analyzing amplicons of the V1–V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene. BMC Res. Notes 9, 380. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2172-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anders, S., and Huber, W. (2010). Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brockmeier, S. L. (2004). Prior infection with Bordetella bronchiseptica increases nasal colonization by Haemophilus parasuis in swine. Vet. Microbiol. 99, 75–78. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.08.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brockmeier, S. L., Palmer, M. V., Bolin, S. R., and Rimler, R. B. (2001). Effects of intranasal inoculation with Bordetella bronchiseptica, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, or a combination of both organisms on subsequent infection with Pasteurella multocida in pigs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 62, 521–525. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.521

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brockmeier, S. L., and Register, K. B. (2007). Expression of the dermonecrotic toxin by Bordetella bronchiseptica is not necessary for predisposing to infection with toxigenic Pasteurella multocida. Vet. Microbiol. 125, 284–289. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brockmeier, S. L., Register, K. B., Kuehn, J. S., Nicholson, T. L., Loving, C. L., Bayles, D. O., et al. (2014). Virulence and draft genome sequence overview of multiple strains of the swine pathogen Haemophilus parasuis. PLoS ONE 9, e103787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103787

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brockmeier, S. L., Register, K. B., Magyar, T., Lax, A. J., Pullinger, G. D., Kunkle, R. A., et al. (2002). Role of the dermonecrotic toxin of Bordetella bronchiseptica in the pathogenesis of respiratory disease in swine. Infect. Immun. 70, 481–490. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.2.481-490.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brockmeier, S. L., Register, K. B., Nicholson, T. L., and Loving, C. L. (2012). “Bordetellosis,” in Diseases of Swine, 10th ed., eds J. J. Zimmerman, L. A. Karriker, A. Ramirez, K. J. Schwartz, and G. W. Stevenson (Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell), 670–679.

Google Scholar

Chanter, N., Magyar, T., and Rutter, J. M. (1989). Interactions between Bordetella bronchiseptica and toxigenic Pasteurella multocida in atrophic rhinitis of pigs. Res. Vet. Sci. 47, 48–53. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)31230-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chiarello, M., McCauley, M., Villeger, S., and Jackson, C. R. (2022). Ranking the biases: the choice of OTUs vs. ASVs in 16S rRNA amplicon data analysis has stronger effects on diversity measures than rarefaction and OTU identity threshold. PLoS One 17, e0264443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264443

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Correa-Fiz, F., Fraile, L., and Aragon, V. (2016). Piglet nasal microbiota at weaning may influence the development of Glasser's disease during the rearing period. BMC Genomics. 17, 404. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2700-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Drost, H. G. (2018). Philentropy: information theory and distance quantification with R. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 765. doi: 10.21105/joss.00765

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dugal, F., Bélanger, M., and Jacques, M. (1992). Enhanced adherence of Pasteurella multocida to porcine tracheal rings preinfected with Bordetella bronchiseptica. Can. J. Vet. Res. 56, 260–264.

Google Scholar

Harris, D. L., and Switzer, W. P. (1968). Turbinate atrophy in young pigs exposed to Bordetella bronchiseptica, Pasteurella multocida, and combined inoculum. Am. J. Vet. Res. 29, 777–785.

Google Scholar

Kozich, J. J., Westcott, S. L., Baxter, N. T., Highlander, S. K., and Schloss, P. D. (2013). Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq illumina sequencing platform. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 5112–5120. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01043-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Loera-Muro, A., Jacques, M., Avelar-Gonzalez, F. J., Labrie, J., Tremblay, Y. D., Oropeza-Navarro, R., et al. (2016). Auxotrophic Actinobacillus pleurpneumoniae grows in multispecies biofilms without the need for nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide (NAD) supplementation. BMC Microbiol. 16, 128. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0742-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Love, M. I., Huber, W., and Anders, S. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

MacInnes, J. I., and Desrosiers, R. (1999). Agents of the “suis-ide diseases” of swine: Actinobacillus suis, Haemophilus parasuis, and Streptococcus suis. Can. J. Vet. Res. 63, 83–89.

Google Scholar

McMurdie, P. J., and Holmes, S. (2013). phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nicholson, T. L., Brockmeier, S. L., and Loving, C. L. (2009). Contribution of Bordetella bronchiseptica filamentous hemagglutinin and pertactin to respiratory disease in swine. Infect. Immun. 77, 2136–2146. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01379-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nicholson, T. L., Brockmeier, S. L., Loving, C. L., Register, K. B., Kehrli, M. E. Jr, Stibitz, S. E., et al. (2012). Phenotypic modulation of the virulent Bvg phase is not required for pathogenesis and transmission of Bordetella bronchiseptica in swine. Infect. Immun. 80, 1025–1036. doi: 10.1128/IAI.06016-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Niederwerder, M. C. (2017). Role of the microbiome in swine respiratory disease. Vet. Microbiol. 209, 97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.02.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oksanen, J., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., O'Hara, B., Stevens, M. H. H., Oksanen, M. J., et al. (2007). The vegan package. Community Ecology Package, 631–637.

Google Scholar

Oksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., et al. (2022). vegan: Community Ecology Package version 2.6-2. p. R package.

Google Scholar

Opriessnig, T., Gimenez-Lirola, L. G., and Halbur, P. G. (2011). Polymicrobial respiratory disease in pigs. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 12, 133–148. doi: 10.1017/S1466252311000120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pirolo, M., Espinosa-Gongora, C., Alberdi, A., Eisenhofer, R., Soverini, M., Eriksen, E. O., et al. (2023). Bacterial topography of the upper and lower respiratory tract in pigs. Anim Microbiome. 5, 5. doi: 10.1186/s42523-023-00226-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

R Core Team (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna. Available online at: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed April 28, 2022).

Google Scholar

Rampelotto, P. H., Dos Santos, A. C. R., Muterle Varela, A. P., Takeuti, K. L., Loiko, M. R., Mayer, F. Q., et al. (2022). Comparative analysis of the upper respiratory bacterial communities of pigs with or without respiratory clinical signs: from weaning to finishing phase. Biology 11, 1111. doi: 10.3390/biology11081111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vecht, U., Arends, J. P., van der Molen, E. J., and van Leengoed, L. A. (1989). Differences in virulence between two strains of Streptococcus suis type II after experimentally induced infection of newborn germ-free pigs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 50, 1037–1043.

Google Scholar

Vecht, U., Wisselink, H. J., van Dijk, J. E., and Smith, H. E. (1992). Virulence of Streptococcus suis type 2 strains in newborn germfree pigs depends on phenotype. Infect. Immun. 60, 550–556. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.2.550-556.1992

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Votsch, D., Willenborg, M., Baumgartner, W., Rohde, M., and Valentin-Weigand, P. (2021). Bordetella bronchiseptica promotes adherence, colonization, and cytotoxicity of Streptococcus suis in a porcine precision-cut lung slice model. Virulence. 12, 84–95. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1858604

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weyrich, L. S., Feaga, H. A., Park, J., Muse, S. J., Safi, C. Y., Rolin, O. Y., et al. (2014). Resident microbiota affect Bordetella pertussis infectious dose and host specificity. J. Infect. Dis. 209, 913–921. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit597

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L., Francois, R., et al. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 4, 1686. doi: 10.21105/joss.01686

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wickham, H., Chang, W., and Wickham, M. H. (2016). Package ‘ggplot2'. Create Elegant Data Visualisations using the Grammar of Graphics Version. 2, 1–189.

Google Scholar

Wilke, C. O., Wickham, H., and Wilke, M. C. O. (2019). Package ‘Cowplot'. Streamlined Plot Theme and Plot Annotations for ‘ggplot2'.

Google Scholar

Zhao, Z., Wang, C., Xue, Y., Tang, X., Wu, B., Cheng, X., et al. (2011). The occurrence of Bordetella bronchiseptica in pigs with clinical respiratory disease. Vet. J. 188, 337–340. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.05.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: swine, nasal, upper respiratory tract (URT), microbiota, Bordetella bronchiseptica, post-weaning

Citation: Nielsen DW, Hau SJ, Mou KT, Alt DP and Brockmeier SL (2023) Shifts in the swine nasal microbiota following Bordetella bronchiseptica challenge in a longitudinal study. Front. Microbiol. 14:1260465. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1260465

Received: 17 July 2023; Accepted: 25 August 2023;
Published: 29 September 2023.

Edited by:

Jeffrey H. Withey, Wayne State University, United States

Reviewed by:

Carol Wolfgang Maddox, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, United States
Andrew Winters, Wayne State University, United States
Lindsay Gielda, Purdue University Northwest, United States

Copyright © 2023 Nielsen, Hau, Mou, Alt and Brockmeier. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Susan L. Brockmeier, susan.brockmeier@usda.gov

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.