Olivier N. Lemaire
Mélissa Belhamri
Tristan Wagner- Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany
Whilst widespread in the microbial world, the hybrid cluster protein (HCP) has been paradoxically a long-time riddle for microbiologists. During three decades, numerous studies on a few model organisms unravelled its structure and dissected its metal-containing catalyst, but the physiological function of the enzyme remained elusive. Recent studies on bacteria point towards a nitric oxide reductase activity involved in resistance during nitrate and nitrite reduction as well as host infection. In this study, we isolated and characterised a naturally highly produced HCP class I from a marine methanogenic archaeon grown on ammonia. The crystal structures of the enzyme in a reduced and partially oxidised state, obtained at a resolution of 1.45 and 1.36-Å, respectively, offered a precise picture of the archaeal enzyme intimacy. There are striking similarities with the well-studied enzymes from Desulfovibrio species regarding sequence, kinetic parameters, structure, catalyst conformations, and internal channelling systems. The close phylogenetic relationship between the enzymes from Methanococcales and many Bacteria corroborates this similarity. Indeed, Methanococcales HCPs are closer to these bacterial homologues than to any other archaeal enzymes. The relatively high constitutive production of HCP in M. thermolithotrophicus, in the absence of a notable nitric oxide source, questions the physiological function of the enzyme in these ancient anaerobes.
1. Introduction
Hybrid clusters are metallo-cofactors constituted of a mixture of Fe atoms bridged with sulphur and oxygen atoms. The most notorious enzymes harbouring them as a prosthetic group are the hybrid cluster proteins (HCPs, also historically named prismane protein) (Aragão et al., 2008; Hagen, 2022), which are present in strict or facultative anaerobic archaea and bacteria [e.g., the bacterium Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Cooper et al., 2000) and the archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus (Overeijnder et al., 2009)], and even a few unicellular eukaryotes [e.g., the microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (van Lis et al., 2020)]. Since the first publication in 1989 (Hagen et al., 1989), HCPs have been extensively studied by metal content determination (Moura et al., 1992; Pierik et al., 1992), different types of spectroscopy (Hagen et al., 1989; Moura et al., 1992; Pierik et al., 1992; Stokkermans et al., 1992; van den Berg et al., 1994; Marritt et al., 1995; Hagen et al., 1998; Kröckel et al., 1998; Tavares et al., 1998; Pereira et al., 1999; van den Berg et al., 2000; Macedo et al., 2002), redox titration (Pierik et al., 1992; Stokkermans et al., 1992; van den Berg et al., 1994, 2000), and X-ray crystallography (Cooper et al., 2000; Macedo et al., 2002, 2003; Aragão et al., 2003, 2008; Fujishiro et al., 2021), characterising the hybrid cluster in its different redox states. The cluster undergoes a complex chemistry with four oxidation states (reduced, semi-oxidised, oxidised, and super-oxidised, see Hagen, 2022) with distinct spectroscopic properties and structures also recently observed in the carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (CODH) type V. The CODH type V is homologous to HCP and shares the cluster chemical composition and a similar overall fold whilst increasing in complexity (Jeoung et al., 2022). The most studied HCPs are those found in Desulfovibrio vulgaris and Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (named below DvHCP and DdHCP, respectively), followed by the isoform found in Escherichia coli (EcHCP). The data gathered on enzymes from other organisms remain scarce.
Despite the undertaken efforts, the physiological function of HCPs is still elusive 30 years after their discovery. Various studies showed that the protein is produced in the presence of nitrate/nitrite (van den Berg et al., 2000; Kim et al., 2003; Haveman et al., 2004; Beliaev et al., 2005; Filenko et al., 2005; He et al., 2006; Cadby et al., 2017), sulphate (Aragão et al., 2003), oxidative stress (Briolat and Reysset, 2002; Almeida et al., 2006), or during pathogenic infection (Okinaka et al., 2002; Kim et al., 2003; Roos and Klemm, 2006). HCP was initially shown to reduce hydroxylamine (a side product of nitrate/nitrite reduction) to ammonia, which would allow its assimilation (Wolfe et al., 2002). Hydroxylamine reduction was confirmed in different HCPs (Wolfe et al., 2002; Aragão et al., 2003; Cabello et al., 2004; Overeijnder et al., 2009), and the protein was shown to enhance cellular resistance to nitrite and hydroxylamine (Cabello et al., 2004; Yurkiw et al., 2012), allowing nitrogen acquisition (Cabello et al., 2004). Nevertheless, the kinetic parameters of the enzyme (KM in the millimolar range, low activity compared to other enzymes, especially at physiological pH) are incompatible with a physiological hydroxylamine reductase function (Almeida et al., 2006; Cole, 2021; Hagen, 2022). The activity is considered a side reaction, as it has been shown for other enzymes, including the Ni-dependent CODH homologous to HCPs (Mager, 1960; Faeder et al., 1974; Ostrowski et al., 1989; Heo et al., 2002; Hagen, 2022; Jeoung et al., 2022). A peroxidase function was later demonstrated (Almeida et al., 2006), but the gene expression was not systematically correlated during oxidative stress (Zhang et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2022), and the kinetic parameters (catalytic turnover ranging from 0.05 to 0.17 s−1, concomitant production of more efficient peroxidases in the culture conditions) again appeared incoherent with a physiological peroxidase function (Cole, 2021; Hagen, 2022). More recently, the HCP was shown to act as high-affinity nitric oxide (NO)-reductase, detoxifying NO into nitrous oxide N2O at physiological concentrations, and its overexpression protects cells against nitrosative stress (Kim et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2016; Hagen, 2019). Accordingly, HCP production depends on a NO-inducible promotor in some organisms, in agreement with a possible role in the nitrate/nitrite reduction pathway as the nitrite reduction is a source of NO (Filenko et al., 2007; Spiro, 2007; Wang et al., 2016; Bulot et al., 2019; Gao et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2020). The similar effects/co-occurrence of reactive oxygen species, NO/nitrosylative stress, and the promiscuity of NO for oxidative stress sensors would explain the production of HCP during oxidative stress (Filenko et al., 2007). The NO reductase activity was later amended by a role in protein transnitrosylation (Seth et al., 2018) in which HCP generates R-S-nitrosothiol from NO. If the exact process of HCP-dependent protein nitrosylation has not been fully unveiled yet [and is still debated (Cole, 2021; Hagen, 2022)], spectroscopic analysis confirmed the existence of a dinitrosyl form of the hybrid cluster, thought to be an intermediate during NO reduction to N2O, that could represent a nitrosyl donor for nitrosylation (Hagen, 2019). Finally, an HCP study on a photosynthetic microalga speculates a nitrate-reducing S-nitrosylase function that has to be experimentally proven (van Lis et al., 2020). The HCP physiological function appears to be on the path to being solved. Yet, alternative functions might exist depending on the organism, the growth conditions, or the HCP class/isoform.
Three HCP classes were historically sorted based on their sequences (van den Berg et al., 2000; Hagen, 2022). Classes I and II differ by a 4-residue insertion in the cubane [4Fe-4S] cluster binding motif, whilst class III exhibits a reduced N-terminal domain. Recent phylogenetic analysis pointed out that these classes do not form phylogenetic groups: if class III forms a branch distinct from both other classes, class II appears to be a subgroup of class I (van Lis et al., 2020). The same study suggested that class III even precedes the separation of the life domains and would be present in the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) (van Lis et al., 2020; Hagen, 2022; Jeoung et al., 2022). The gene coding for class II HCP, such as EcHCP, is often found in the genome next to a gene coding for the HCP reductase, a NAD(P)H oxidising flavoenzyme involved in oxidoreduction of the HCP and whom equivalent in class I and III is not known (van den Berg et al., 2000; Hagen, 2022). Another noticeable difference between HCP classes is that HCP class III appears to be dimeric, whilst all characterised classes I and II were shown to be monomeric [with the exception of one report in the case of nitrosylated enzyme (Seth et al., 2018)].
Many archaeal genomes harbour a gene coding for a putative HCP belonging exclusively to class I or III (van Lis et al., 2020). The sole archaeal HCP biochemically studied is from Pyrococcus furiosus and belongs to class III (Overeijnder et al., 2009). Noteworthy, the only available structure of an archaeal HCP is from the thermophilic methanogen Methanothermobacter marburgensis. According to our knowledge, this class III representative [available in the PDB database under ID 7E0L (Fujishiro and Takaoka, 2022)] has yet to be described in any publication. This structure will not be used for more than sequences and comparisons to respect the authors’ study.
The presence of HCP in methanogens is unexpected as most of these ancient organisms are not known to use nitrate, nitrite, or NO as these oxidants are toxic to them (Klüber and Conrad, 1998). Recent transcriptomics studies on the nitrogen metabolism from the thermophilic archaeon Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus have been investigated by our group and showed a constitutively rather high expression of an HCP class I at a level comparable to that of genes coding for enzymes involved in methanogenesis (Maslać et al., 2022). In this study, we purified the HCP from M. thermolithotrophicus grown on ammonia as the only nitrogen source and obtained its structure in reduced and semi-oxidised states. The conservation in architecture, active site, reactions, and internal tunnelling systems is discussed. Phylogenetic analyses show that the HCPs from Methanococcales species are closer to bacterial HCPs than to any archaeal enzymes, which further questions their physiological functions in methanogens.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Strains and growth conditions
Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus strain DSM 2095 was obtained from the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). The archaeon was grown on ammonia and sulphate in a fermenter at 65°C, as described in Jespersen et al. (2023).
2.2. Protein purification
The purification of the native MtHCP was originally performed based on its colour and the natural abundance of the protein. It was purified several times with a similar, reproducible protocol. The optimal one is described below. The heterologous production of the enzyme was not attempted.
Cell lysis was performed under an N2/CO2 (90:10%) atmosphere. About 19 g (wet weight) of frozen cells were thawed and diluted with four volumes of lysis buffer (50 mM tricine/NaOH pH 8.0, 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT)), sonicated (3 × 10 s at 70% power, probe KE76 Bandelin SONOPULS Berlin, Germany), and centrifuged for 1 h at 45,000 x g at 18°C. The following overall procedure was performed under yellow light and at 20°C. The supernatant was transferred to an anaerobic Coy tent containing an N2/H2 (97:3%) atmosphere, filtered through a 0.2 μm filter (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany), and loaded on a 20 ml HiTrap DEAE-Sepharose fast flow column (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany). Elution was performed with a 100–600 mM NaCl linear gradient for 15 column volumes (CVs) at a flow rate of 2.5 ml/min. The sample of interest eluted between 125 and 310 mM NaCl. The resulting pool was diluted with four volumes of lysis buffer, filtered, and loaded on a 15 ml HiTrap Q-Sepharose High-Performance column (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany). Elution was performed with a linear gradient ranging from 0 to 500 mM NaCl for 13.33 CV at a flow rate of 2 ml/min. The fractions of interest was eluted between 248 and 320 mM NaCl. The resulting pooled fraction was diluted with four volumes of 25 mM Tris/HCl) pH 7.6, 2 M (NH4)2SO4, and 2 mM DTT, filtered through a 0.2 μm filter (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany), and injected on a 5 ml HiTrap Phenyl Sepharose High-Performance column (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany). The sample was eluted with a 1.8 to 0 M linear gradient of (NH4)2SO4 for 24 CV at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min. The protein was eluted between 0.41 and 0.25 M (NH4)2SO4. After concentration up to 400 μl with a 10-kDa cutoff centrifugation filter (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), contaminants were separated by size-exclusion chromatography on a Superose 6 Increase 10/300 GL (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany) in 25 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.6, 2 mM DTT, and 10% (v/v) glycerol at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. The final pool was concentrated with a 10-kDa cutoff centrifugation filter (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and protein concentration was estimated by the Bradford method (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Munich, Germany). Each purification step was systematically controlled by denaturing sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The protein was directly used for crystallisation or aliquoted and stored frozen at −80°C.
2.3. Protein crystallisation
Crystallisation was performed anaerobically by initial screening at 20°C using the sitting drop method on 96-Well MRC 2-Drop polystyrene Crystallisation Plates (SWISSCI) in a Coy tent containing an N2/H2 (97:3%) atmosphere. The reservoir chamber was filled with 90 μl of crystallisation condition (JBScreen Wizard crystallisation screen, Jena Bioscience), and the crystallisation drop was formed by spotting 0.55 μl of purified protein with 0.55 μl of precipitant. Both structures were obtained from the same drop, opened several months apart. The protein was crystallised at 9.9 mg/ml in a solution containing 20% (w/v) PEG 3,350 and 200 mM magnesium formate. Densities in the electron density map suggest contamination from another crystallisation condition spatially close and containing 30% (v/v) 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol, 20 mM calcium chloride, and 100 mM sodium acetate, pH 4.6.
For the reduced state, the crystals were soaked in the crystallisation solution supplemented with 20% (v/v) glycerol for a few seconds before freezing in liquid nitrogen. For the reduced/oxidised state, the crystals were soaked in the crystallisation solution supplemented by 100 mM hydroxylamine/HCl for 5.7 min and then transferred in the crystallisation solution supplemented with 20% (v/v) ethylene glycol for a few seconds before freezing in liquid nitrogen.
2.4. Data collection and structural analysis
The diffraction experiments were performed at 100 K on the beamline P11 from DESY and PXIII (X06DA) from the Swiss Light Source (SLS). The data were processed and scaled with autoPROC (Vonrhein et al., 2011). The data of the structure of MtHCP in the reduced/oxidised state presented anisotropy (along the following axes: a = 1.451 Å, b = 1.343 Å, and c = 1.748 Å) and was further processed with STARANISO correction integrated with the autoPROC pipeline (Tickle et al., 2018) (STARANISO. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Global Phasing Ltd.).
The structure of the reduced MtHCP was solved by performing a single anomalous dispersion experiment at the Fe K-edge (Supplementary Table S1) using the SHELX package (Usón and Sheldrick, 2018). The first model was then refined by extending the resolution to 1.45 Å by a second dataset. The reduced state was used as a template to solve the reduced/oxidised state structure by molecular replacement with PHASER from the PHENIX package (Liebschner et al., 2019). The resolution limit was determined based on the obtained electron density map quality and Rpim as major criteria. All models were manually built via COOT (Emsley et al., 2010) and refined with PHENIX (version 1.20.1-4487). The last refinement steps were performed by refining with translation libration screw (TLS) for the reduced state and considering all atoms anisotropic for the reduced/oxidised state and were validated by the MolProbity server (Chen et al., 2010)1. Both models were refined with hydrogens in the riding position. Hydrogens were omitted in the final deposited models. The PDB ID codes of the structures are 8CNR and 8CNS for the MtHCPred and MtHCPmix structures, respectively. Data collection and refinement statistics for the deposited models are listed in Supplementary Table S1. All figures were generated and rendered with PyMOL (Version 2.2.0, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, United States). The structural superpositions in Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Figure S3 were performed with PyMOL or the secondary-structure matching (SSM) tool from the CCP4 suite (Krissinel and Henrick, 2004; Winn et al., 2011). For the elaboration of Supplementary Figure S3, the B-factor column of 8CNR was replaced by the residues deviation obtained from SSM by the PyMOL script data2bfactor.py written by Robert L. Campbell. The protein was then coloured by residues deviation. Non-aligned residues, residues with aberrant deviation, and fragments of three residues or less were omitted for clarity. Internal tunnel predictions were performed by the CAVER tool (Kozlikova et al., 2014) by applying a probe radius of 1.0 Å and starting from the Cβ of the cysteine at position 455 (MtHCP) or the equivalent cysteine.
2.5. High-resolution clear native PAGE (hrCN PAGE) and size-exclusion chromatography
The hrCN PAGE protocol was adapted from Lemaire et al. (2018). Glycerol was added to the sample at a final amount of 20% (v/v). Ponceau S at a final concentration of 0.001% (w/v) served as a marker to follow the migration. The buffer composition for the electrophoresis cathode was the following: 50 mM tricine, 15 mM Bis-Tris/HCl, pH 7.0, 0.05% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, 2 mM DTT, and 0.01% (w/v) dodecyl maltoside, whilst the anode buffer contained 50 mM Bis-Tris/HCl, PH 7.0, 2 mM DTT. An 8–15% linear polyacrylamide gradient gel was used, and electrophoresis was run under a N2/CO2 (90:10%) atmosphere with a constant 40 mA current (PowerPac™ Basic Power Supply, Bio-Rad). After electrophoresis, protein bands were visualised with Ready Blue™ Protein Gel stain (Sigma Aldrich, Hamburg, Germany). The native protein ladder used is NativeMark™ Unstained Protein Standard (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Driesch, Germany).
The determination of the oligomeric state by gel filtration was performed in triplicate on a Superose 6 Increase 10/300 GL (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany) in 25 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.6, 2 mM DTT, 10% (v/v) glycerol at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min, and in an anaerobic Coy tent containing an N2/H2 (97:3%) atmosphere. High molecular weight range gel filtration calibration kit (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany) was used as the protein standard.
2.6. Absorbance spectra
The protein absorbance spectra were monitored aerobically and anaerobically. The aerobic oxidised spectrum was monitored using a Cary 60 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies). Absorbance spectra were measured by scanning the wavelength from 250 to 600 nm, with a measurement every 0.5 nm, in a 1 mm-path length TrayCell (Hellma Analytics) at room temperature. The protein concentration was 26.4 mg/ml, and the baseline absorbance spectrum of the buffer was subtracted from the measured protein spectrum. The anaerobic spectra were monitored on a BMG Labtech FLUOstar Omega Microplate reader in an anaerobic chamber filled with an N2 (100%) atmosphere at room temperature. The protein concentration was 3.4 mg/ml, and the baseline absorbance spectrum of the buffer was subtracted from the measured protein spectrum. The spectrum was monitored on a 384 wells transparent plate using an 18 μl sample volume. The protein was reduced or oxidised by the addition of 200 μM of sodium dithionite or potassium ferricyanide, respectively.
2.7. Enzymatic assays
The hydroxylamine reductase assay was performed according to the protocol set up by Wolfe et al. (2002). The activity was monitored by the enzyme-dependent decrease in the absorbance of methyl viologen (MV) at 600 nm on a BMG Labtech FLUOstar Omega Microplate reader in an anaerobic chamber filled with an N2 (100%) atmosphere. For practical reasons (physical limits of the equipment and limitation of the evaporation), activities were monitored at 50°C. Measurements were acquired in 100 mM CHES/NaOH pH 9.0 or in 50 mM HEPES/HCl pH 7.35 with the addition of 10 μM EDTA, 10 mM MV, and 75 μM sodium dithionite. The final protein concentration was 26.4 μg/ml at pH 7.35 and 2.64 µg/ml at pH 9.0 (200 µl final volume), and the tested hydroxylamine concentration ranged from 0 to 105 mM final. At pH 9.0, activities with a hydroxylamine concentration above 15 mM could not be reliably measured as it appears to induce reproducible drops in enzyme activity, probably due to the combined high temperature and pH. Enzyme-independent viologen oxidation after hydroxylamine addition, proportional to hydroxylamine concentration, had to be subtracted for every measurement. The molar extinction coefficient of MV used for calculation was determined experimentally in our working conditions (12,791 M−1. cm−1 and 13,489 M−1. cm−1 at pH 7.35 and 9.0, respectively). The activity measurements at both pHs can be fitted with a similar coefficient of determination using a Michaelis–Menten or a Hill equation, yet at pH 7.35, the Hill equation appears to be a better fit (R2 = 0.963 vs. 0.932 for the Michaelis–Menten equation). No cooperativity mechanism has been observed or proposed for other HCPs, and there is no experimental evidence for a reaction mechanism in HCP that would deviate from a Michaelis–Menten equation. The difference in R2 observed in the fits of our experiments is insufficient to question the proposed reaction mechanism in HCP, and the kinetic parameters used in the text were determined assuming a Michaelis–Menten equation. All measurements have been done in triplicates using a protein obtained from a unique purification and are presented in μmol of reduced hydroxylamine per minute per mg of protein, considering a mole of hydroxylamine reduced for two moles of viologen oxidised.
The peroxidase assay was performed aerobically according to the protocol set up by Almeida et al. (2006). The activity was monitored by following the enzyme-dependent decrease in the absorbance of sodium ascorbate at 290 nm (ε290nm of 2,800 M−1.cm−1) due to the oxidation of ascorbate by hydrogen peroxidase reduction, using quartz cuvettes and a Cary 60 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies). The reaction mixture (400 μl) contained 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and 0.2 mM sodium ascorbate. The experiment was assessed at 30, 40, 50, and 60°C. The used hydrogen peroxide concentration varied from 1 mM to 10 mM, and the MtHCP concentration varied from 3.3 μg/ml to 132 μg/ml. Appropriate controls were performed for each assay and showed that no enzyme-dependent significant decrease in absorbance could be detected in any reproducible assay.
2.8. Sequence alignments and phylogenetic analysis
The protein sequence of MtHCP was used as a query for BLAST (Altschul et al., 1997) in Protein Data Bank (PDB) and in the RefSeq database. The RefSeq database was selected to limit species redundancy and because it usually contains genomes of non-questionable quality. The search in the PDB extracted the sequences of structurally characterised HCPs (Cooper et al., 2000; Macedo et al., 2002; Aragão et al., 2003; Macedo et al., 2003; Fujishiro et al., 2021; Fujishiro and Takaoka, 2022). The maximal E-value (9 × 10−122) was with MmHCP (PDB 7E0L). The searches in the RefSeq were set up to extract 500 sequences without additional parameters for the first research (maximal E-value 0.0) and limited to the Archaea kingdom for the second (maximal E-value for HCP, 1 × 10−108, E-value for CODH 1 × 10−13). The Supplementary Figure S2 was constructed using the sequence of MtHCP and the sequences extracted from the BLAST search in the PDB. It was designed with ESPript 3 (Robert and Gouet, 2014) by using an alignment constructed with Clustal Omega (Sievers et al., 2011).
The phylogenetic trees were constructed using the maximum likelihood method and were generated with the MEGA programme (Kumar et al., 2018) by using an alignment constructed with MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004). A total of 200 replicates were used to calculate each node score. The first presented tree was constructed with the sequences from the non-limited search in the RefSeq databank and the results from the PDB. The second tree was constructed with the sequences from the search in the RefSeq databank limited to Archaea, in which the sequences corresponding to CODH were manually deleted except one (CODHα from Methanospirillum hungatei, WP_011448292.1) and the results from the PDB. The tree shown in Supplementary Figure S11 was constructed with the sequences obtained from the three BLAST results (in the PDB and in the RefSeq database, non-restricted, and restricted to Archaea in which CODH sequences were deleted).
3. Results
3.1. MtHCP overall architecture
The native HCP from the thermophilic methanogen M. thermolithotrophicus (MtHCP) was purified anaerobically by multiple chromatography steps and immediately crystallised without freezing. The purified brown protein fraction presents a major band of approximately 60 kDalton (Da) on SDS-PAGE (Figure 1A, MtHCP expected molecular weight of 59,665.17 Da). The native electrophoresis and gel filtration mostly fit a monomeric organisation of the enzyme (Figures 1A,B). The spectrophotometric absorbance spectrum is typical of the [4Fe-4S] cluster-containing proteins and similar to previously published spectra of HCPs (Moura et al., 1992; Pierik et al., 1992; Stokkermans et al., 1992; Pereira et al., 1999; van den Berg et al., 2000; Figure 1C). Even if purified anaerobically and in the presence of dithiothreitol in the storage buffer, the spectrum of the frozen purified enzyme suggests an oxidised state that might be due to the long storage at −80°C (Figure 1C). The crystal structure was solved by single-wavelength anomalous dispersion at the Fe K-edge (SAD) and refined to a 1.45-Å resolution (see Materials and methods, Figure 1D, Supplementary Figures S1A,B, and Supplementary Table S1). MtHCP is a monomeric 548-amino acid peptide organised in three domains (first domain residues 1–222, second domain 223–368, and third domain 369–548) harbouring a cubane [4Fe-4S] cluster and the hybrid cluster (Figure 1D). Based on the nomenclature, MtHCP would belong to class I, coherently with cluster binding motif and its monomeric state confirmed in the crystal structure (Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Figure S2). Five extra residues, not expected in the available sequence (due to the incorrect prediction of the initiating methionine, WP_026182881.1), span from the N-terminal. The overall enzyme architecture is highly similar to the available HCP structures from bacteria (Supplementary Figure S3 and Supplementary Table S2). The major differences in structures are located on peripheral loops and helices. The well-defined electron density shows no sign of nitrosylation in the active site surroundings.
Figure 1. Oligomeric state, absorbance spectrum, and MtHCP overall structure. (A) SDS-PAGE (left) and high-resolution Clear Native PAGE (right) profiles of the enriched MtHCP fraction. About 3 μg of the sample kept frozen were loaded on gels. A black arrow indicates the position of MtHCP, and a “#” symbol marks the main contaminant of MtHCP. (B) Molecular weight estimation by size-exclusion chromatography. Protein standards (GE Healthcare, grey line in the insert) and three samples of MtHCP (deep red, red, and orange lines in the insert) are overlaid. The measured elution volume of the standard is plotted (grey dots, upper sizes), and the extracted exponential curve (y = 310753e−0.514x, R2 = 0.9927) was used for molecular weight estimation. The theoretical size of the standard proteins (white dots, smaller sizes) is given for reference. BD stands for blue dextran, T for thyroglobulin, F for ferritin, A for aldolase, C for conalbumin, and O for ovalbumin. (C) Absorbance spectra of MtHCP after freezing and storage at −80°C. The aerobic spectrum is coloured black in the main graph. Anaerobic measurements as isolated (red line), dithionite-reduced (green line), and ferricyanide-oxidised (grey line) are shown in the insert. (D) Overall structure of the MtHCP. The protein is presented in cartoon coloured by domains (N-terminal, central, and C-terminal domains being coloured blue, green, and red, respectively) with the clusters presented as ball and stick. Sulphur and iron are coloured yellow and orange, respectively.
Differences in surface charges distribution were noticed between HCP class I for Desulfovibrio species and class II for E. coli (Fujishiro et al., 2021). An inspection of the surface charges in MtHCP nuances the contrasts between classes I and II (Figure 2). MtHCP exhibits a large negatively charged area on its surface surrounding a ~ 17-Å invagination towards the [4Fe-4S] cluster (Figure 2), also conserved in the bacterial structures. The cavity is polar, filled with water molecules in all structures, and exhibits a positively charged depth close to the cluster (Figure 2). It is interrupted in the structure of EcHCP by the tryptophan at position 193 (Figure 2D) in a loop that is displaced in class I HCP structures. However, considering the loose electron density for this residue, the negatively charged cavity might be open to the solvent (modelled in Figure 2E). Furthermore, the residue is not conserved in all class II HCPs.
Figure 2. Charge distribution and access to the [4Fe-4S] cluster in HCP structures. (A–E) Charge distribution on the protein surface (left) and on the polar cavity near the cluster (right). Left: the proteins are shown in two orientations. A dashed black square highlights the entry of the polar cavities and the red arrow points to the loop proposed to interact with the partner in EcHCP and its equivalent in other structures. Right panel: surface of the polar cavity and filled water molecules. The water molecules, [4Fe-4S] cluster, and tryptophan 193 (framed in grey) of EcHCP are shown as balls and sticks. The structures presented are MtHCPred (PDB 8CNR, A), DdHCPred (PDB 1OA0, B), DvHCPred (PDB 1OA1, C), EcHCP (PDB 7DE4, D), and the EcHCP structure with a different conformation of tryptophan 193 (E).
3.2. Structure of the active site in reduced and oxidised states
The structure harbours a hybrid cluster in a [4Fe-3S] composition, matching the bacterial homologues in their reduced state (Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure S1). The active sites of MtHCP and the 1.25-Å resolution structure of the reduced DdHCP are superimposable. Notably, residues surrounding the hybrid cluster are remarkably conserved between the sequences from Desulfovibrio species and M. thermolithotrophicus (Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure S2). The main difference is a 1.0-Å shift of the “Y-atom” at the hybrid cluster vicinity, which has also been attributed to an oxygen atom in MtHCP based on the electron density (Figure 3). Because of the unequivocal chemical composition [4Fe 2μ3-S μ2-S (O)] of the hybrid cluster, we propose that the as-isolated MtHCP represents the reduced state (Supplementary Figure S1C, the nomenclature MtHCPred will be used below). The difference between the reduced state in the structure and the oxidised state observed in spectrophotometry could come from the prolonged storage freezing at −80°C that might have led to the oxidation of the protein (Figure 1C). Alternatively, the crystallisation may have conserved or triggered the cluster reduction.
Figure 3. Overall organisation and active site of the isolated MtHCP. (A,B) Stereo representation of the active site in two different orientations in the structures of MtHCPred (A) and superimposition of the structures of MtHCPred and DdHCPred (PDB 1OA0, B). The residues coordinating or interacting with the cluster are shown as balls and sticks. The structures are shown as transparent cartoons with the MtHCP structure coloured wheat and the DvHCPred coloured light cyan. Oxygen, nitrogen, sulphur, and iron are coloured red, blue, yellow, and orange, respectively. The atom of the cluster is labelled according to previous studies (Hagen, 2022). The distance between the position of the Y-atom in MtHCPred and DdHCPred (modelled as oxygen in both structures) is shown as a dashed line and indicated in Ångström.
In order to obtain a different state of the active site or an intermediate of reaction, crystals were soaked in a solution of hydroxylamine (non-physiological substrate, 100 mM final) for a few minutes under anaerobic conditions before freezing in liquid nitrogen. The crystal structure was refined to 1.36-Å resolution (Supplementary Table S1), and the protein backbone was superimposed closely to the MtHCPred structure (Supplementary Table S2). The hybrid cluster appeared to have both reduced and oxidised/semi-oxidised states. Therefore, the structure is referred to as MtHCPmix (Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure S4). A similar case of redox state mixture was reported for the HCP of D. desulfuricans (Macedo et al., 2003) (PDB code 1UPX). Both states of the hybrid cluster can be appropriately modelled due to the previous structural characterisation of HCPs. The reduced state is similar to the MtHCPred structure, with a noticeable difference in the glutamate 490 side chain position (Figures 4B,C). The carboxy group of the glutamate rotates 60° and disengages from the Fe atom (Fe number 8), leaving the Fe with three covalent bonds (Supplementary Figure S5). The oxidised/semi-oxidised state that contains a [4Fe μ3-S μ2-S, a persulphido and 3μ2-O] hybrid cluster fits very well with the ones observed in bacterial homologues. Here, the Fe atom 8 (according to the numbering from Hagen, 2022) is coordinated by two oxygen atoms, the glutamate 490 and the persulphido-cysteine 402 (Figures 4D,E). This “extracted” state will be referred to as MtHCPox below.
Figure 4. Active site of the MtHCP in mixed redox state and the isolated states. (A) Stereo representation of the active site of the MtHCPmix containing a mixture of reduced and oxidised/semi-oxidised states. (B) Reduced state of the cluster extracted from the MtHCPmix structure. (C) Superimposition of the extracted structure of the reduced state and MtHCPred. (D) Oxidised/semi-oxidised state (MtHCPox) of the cluster extracted from the MtHCPmix structure. (E) Superimposition of the MtHCPox structure and the structure of the oxidised state of DdHCP (PDB 1GNL). (A–E) The structures are shown as transparent cartoons, with the hybrid cluster represented as spheres and the coordinating/interacting residues as balls and sticks. MtHCPmix and its extracted structures are coloured light pink, the MtHCPred structure is coloured wheat, and the DdHCPox structure is coloured green cyan. Oxygen, nitrogen, sulphur, and iron are coloured red, blue, yellow, and orange, respectively. (C,E) The extracted states of MtHCPmix are highlighted by a blue glow for clarity.
The partial oxidation of the active site gives an opportunity to describe the conformational changes between reduced and oxidised states in MtHCP (Figure 5). As for bacterial enzymes, the major changes are the position of Fe8 and S7 that undergo large movement (1.8 and 3.9 Å, respectively). Assuming a unique sulphur atom, the S7 position between Fe5 and Fe7 is replaced by oxygen and forms a persulphido group on the cysteine 402. The Fe8 loses the bonding with cysteine 402 and an oxygen bond the Fe6 and Fe8.
Figure 5. Transition of the hybrid cluster from reduced to oxidised/semi-oxidised state. (A) The reduced state structure MtHCPred. (B) Transition from the reduced to oxidised/semi-oxidised states. The structure of the reduced state (as shown in panel A) is overlaid with the oxidised/semi-oxidised state outlined in black and white. The proposed movement of the atoms is symbolised by arrows, except for movements below 1 Å. (C) The oxidised/semi-oxidised state of the hybrid cluster (MtHCPox extracted from MtHCPmix). The structures are represented in wheat (reduced state) and light pink (oxidised/semi-oxidised) transparent cartoon, with the cofactors and residues coordinating/interacting with the cluster being shown as balls and sticks. Oxygen, nitrogen, sulphur, and iron atoms are coloured red, blue, yellow, and orange, respectively. The atom numbering originates from (Hagen, 2022).
3.3. MtHCP enzymatic activities
Because of their structural similarity, we aimed to compare the enzymatic properties of MtHCP with that of previously characterised HCPs. The hydroxylamine reductase activity was assessed at 50°C, at a pH of 7.35, close to the physiological pH (Jarrell and Sprott, 1981), but also at pH 9.0 as tested in other studies, enabling a higher reaction turnover (Wolfe et al., 2002; Aragão et al., 2003; Cabello et al., 2004; Overeijnder et al., 2009). At pH 7.35, we determined an apparent KM of 2.2 ± 0.5 mM, an apparent maximal velocity approximately 0.072 ± 0.004 μmol of hydroxylamine reduced/min/mg of purified HCP, and a turnover of 0.072 s−1 (Supplementary Figure S6). At pH 9.0, an apparent KM of 3.9 ± 0.9 mM, Vmax of 1.660 ± 0.157 μmol of hydroxylamine reduced/min/mg of purified HCP, and a turnover of 1.667 s−1 were obtained. Therefore, the enzyme exhibits an activity approximately 20–25-fold higher at pH 9.0, similar to the enzyme of E. coli (Wolfe et al., 2002) and in the range of other HCPs (Cabello et al., 2004; Overeijnder et al., 2009). However, purified MtHCP exhibits a comparable KM, in the millimolar range, at both pHs, unlike the enzyme from E. coli. The kinetic parameters of the enzyme appear to be unsuitable with a physiological reduction of hydroxylamine, as for other HCPs (Hagen, 2022).
The peroxidase activity of MtHCP was also tested but could not be monitored with the protocol used by Almeida and colleagues (Almeida et al., 2006). No significant enzyme-dependent ascorbate reduction could be recorded even at an enzyme concentration of 20 μM final. A significant enzyme-independent decrease in ascorbate absorbance occurred, especially at higher temperatures. As the specific peroxidase activities previously measured using EcHCP and DdHCP were relatively low [0.17 and 0.05 μmol.min−1.mg−1, respectively (Almeida et al., 2006)], a weak peroxidase activity of MtHCP, possibly overlooked in our experiments, cannot be ruled out.
3.4. Hydrophobic tunnels
The study of the first X-ray structure of an HCP already highlighted the presence of hydrophobic cavities within the enzyme structure (Cooper et al., 2000), Similarly to CODH (Lemaire and Wagner, 2021; Biester et al., 2022; Jeoung et al., 2022). A cavity analysis by the CAVER programme (Kozlikova et al., 2014) showed that the hydrophobic channels are also present in the MtHCPred structure (Figure 6A). Five channels devoid of any water molecules were detected, spanning an overall distance of approximately 63-Å (tunnel length from the extremities of tunnels 1 and 5) within the enzyme from an edge to another. The channelling system connects the active site to several openings on the protein surface, and most of the side chains structuring the channels are hydrophobic (57/62, see Supplementary Figures S2, S7), probably for repelling charged or polar molecules that would disturb the reaction. This is in agreement with the absence of water molecules in these tunnels. Depending on the tunnel, the bottleneck exhibits a radius ranging from 1.24 to 1.32 Å (Figure 5A). Analogous tunnels are predicted in the MtHCPmix structure, coherent with the structural conservation in both structures (Figures 6B–D and Supplementary Table S2). Noteworthy, tunnel 2 is obstructed by a molecule that we modelled as 2-methyl-pentane-2,4-diol based on the electron density (Supplementary Figure S8). As it is probably a non-physiological artefact of crystallisation, it was ignored for cavity prediction. Virtually identical tunnels are predicted in the structures of HCP homologues, with various additional extensions of tunnel 5 depending on the model used for the analysis (Figure 6 and Supplementary Figure S9). Most of these tunnels are conserved in the class II EcHCP, but the slight difference in the position of the peptide chain (Supplementary Figure S3 and Supplementary Table S2) offsets the predicted channels (Figure 6).
Figure 6. Channelling system in HCPs. (A) Tunnel analysis of MtHCPred by the CAVER programme. Spheres in different colours represent the tunnels predicted by the analysis, and the bottleneck radius is given in Ångström. (B–D) Prediction of the channelling system in MtHCP structures. (E–G) Prediction of the channelling system in DdHCPred (PDB 1OA0), DdHCPox (PDB 1GNL), and EcHCPox (PDB 7DE4) structures, respectively. (H–J) Superimposition of MtHCPred and bacterial structures and their channelling systems. (A–J) The structures are represented as transparent cartoons. (B–J) The predicted channelling systems are in surfaces with the clusters, and the coordinating cysteine 402 (MtHCP numbering) are presented in balls and sticks, with sulphur and iron coloured yellow and orange, respectively. The structures of MtHCPred, MtHCPmix, DdHCPred, DdHCPox, and EcHCPox are coloured wheat, light pink, light cyan, green cyan, and light yellow, respectively.
As previously seen in CODH type V (Jeoung et al., 2022), the redox state of the hybrid cluster affects its access (Supplementary Figures S10A,B). Once in the oxidised state, the subtle changes in the hybrid cluster generate a so-called pinball effect to provoke the expulsion of the product, restraining the access to the cluster. MtHCP obeys the same rule, narrowing the access to the hybrid cluster due to the formation of the persulphido-cysteine 402 (Supplementary Figures S10A,B). A similar movement occurs in DdHCP and DvHCP (Supplementary Figures S10C,D).
3.5. Phylogenetic position of MtHCP
According to van Lis et al. (2020) study, most of the archaeal class I HCPs cluster in a single group containing bacterial sequences including DvHCP and DdHCP. This common branch suggests that this class of HCP was initially present in one of the domains and was acquired by the second via horizontal gene transfer (van Lis et al., 2020).
A phylogenetic tree was constructed with the available sequences of HCPs from the Protein Data Bank and the 500 closest sequences to MtHCP obtained by a BLAST analysis in the RefSeq database (Figure 7A). Over 500 obtained sequences, only 13 were from archaea, all from species belonging to the Methanococcales order. The remaining sequences were from bacterial class I enzymes belonging to different phyla, with a clear dominance of Bacillota (formerly Firmicutes). The archaeal sequences form a monophyletic group amongst the bacterial tree, and the sequences of the class II EcHCP and the class III MmHCP branch as outgroups of the generated class I HCPs tree. If the precise position of the archaeal HCPs amongst the bacterial sequences cannot be extracted from this analysis, it appears that MtHCP and the enzymes from other Methanococcales belong to class I, as suggested by their sequences. In order to verify the suspicious position of the enzymes from Methanococcales, closer to bacterial HCPs than other archaeal species, another phylogenetic tree was constructed. The sequences used to construct the second tree were extracted from a similar BLAST analysis but restricted to the Archaea domain. The extracted sequences consisted of 184 sequences of archaeal HCPs, the remaining being annotated as CO-dehydrogenases. A preliminary tree showed that the CODH sequences were forming a completely separated branch and were discarded, a single sequence being kept as an outgroup (Figure 7B). This second tree gathers every archaeal HCP sequence from the RefSeq database. The class III HCPs, including MmHCP and the enzyme from P. furiosus, form a separate branch, whilst the distinction between class I and II is unclear in this tree. This was expected because of the position of class II within the class I tree and because of the several ramifications of the class I phylogenetic tree (van Lis et al., 2020). The different branches mostly group organisms belonging to the same archaeal class, and some signs of horizontal gene transfer can be observed. For instance, a sequence of a class I HCP from a species belonging to the Thermoplasmata phylum groups in a branch gathering class I HCPs from Methanomicrobia species (Figure 7B). Similarly, the unique class III HCP found in the Methanomicrobia phylum groups in branch gathering enzymes from Methanobacteria (Figure 7B). The branch corresponding to Methanococcales is intriguingly close to that containing the class I HCPs from Halobacteria, yet Methanococcales and Halobacteria belong to a different clade (Adam et al., 2017). Moreover, the Methanococcales branch also forms a relatively clear group (node score of 77) with the sequences of bacterial class I HCP from D. vulgaris and D. desulfuricans (Figure 7B). It confirms the results of the previous BLAST analysis suggesting that MtHCP and the other enzyme from Methanococcales are closer to bacterial enzymes than to any other archaeal HCP. This tendency is the same when both trees are gathered (Supplementary Figure S11).
Figure 7. MtHCP position in the phylogenetic tree of HCPs. (A) HCP phylogenetic tree from the PDB (highlighted by a dot and labelled) and the 500 closest sequences to MtHCP from the RefSeq database. The branches are coloured by phylum. (B) HCP phylogenetic tree from the PDB (highlighted by a dot and labelled) and the 500 closest sequences to MtHCP from the RefSeq database, restricted to the Archaea domain. The branches are coloured by class. The sequence of P. furiosus is marked as a blue square. The labelled CODH is used as an outgroup. Node statistics (200 replicates) between 50–90 and 90–100 are represented by pink and black dots, respectively.
4. Discussion
4.1. The HCP from Methanococcales as a sister group of characterised bacterial class I
The hybrid cluster protein is encoded in the genome of many anaerobic bacteria, archaea, and unicellular eukaryotes, including common laboratory models. Yet its function is still unclear. The singular chemistry of the cofactor has been intensively dissected in a few model Pseudomonadota species, but the enzyme has rarely been studied in archaea. The HCPs from Methanococcales, including the thermophilic methanogen M. thermolithotrophicus, belong to class I and branch closer to the HCPs extensively studied from Desulfovibrio species. It explains the singular sequence and structure conservation between DdHCP, DvHCP, and MtHCP. Such a phylogenetic organisation led van Lis and colleagues to propose that this group of bacterial enzymes have an archaeal origin, acquired by the bacteria by inter-domain horizontal gene transfer (van Lis et al., 2020). The trees presented in Figure 7 and Supplementary Figure S11 are coherent with this proposal, as they show the branch of bacterial class I HCP emerging from the tree of archaeal HCPs. The HCPs from bacteria and Methanococcales species are harboured by the same branch in which they form monophyletic groups. This branch emerges from a tree mainly composed of sequences from Methanomicrobia and Halobacteria, yet belonging to a different archaeal clade compared to Methanococcales. Hence, the trees suggest horizontal gene transfer between different archaeal phyla but also from archaea to bacteria. As HCPs from Methanococcales species and bacteria cluster separately, one can hypothesise that these organisms acquired the gene from a similar archaeal ancestor or that the transfer of the protein from one group to the other occurred during their early evolution. Anyway, the proximity between archaeal and bacterial enzymes favours the hypothesis of a similar role within the organisms, coherently with the overall conservation of the active site architecture.
4.2. Physiological roles of HCP in methanogens
The different studies tend to agree on a physiological NO reductase role of HCP in bacteria, detoxifying the highly reactive gas in the provenance of side reactions of nitrate and nitrite reduction or from hosts in the case of pathogenic organisms. The NO reduction might be coupled with a regulatory protein trans-nitrosylation activity (Hagen, 2022). The similar kinetic parameters for the hydroxylamine reductase and the identical active site architecture support that MtHCP, DdHCP, and DvHCP share catalytic properties. It also implies that MtHCP should, in principle, perform NO reduction. However, most methanogens, especially Methanococcales, do not infect eukaryotic hosts, and only a few reduce nitrate (Belay et al., 1990; Jeanthon et al., 1998). In our culture conditions, M. thermolithotrophicus produced a sufficient quantity of HCP for native purification and crystallisation, yet the culture depends exclusively on ammonium as a nitrogen source. Accordingly, our recent transcriptomic analysis performed on M. thermolithotrophicus showed that the hcp gene expression is not impacted by the nitrogen source, unlike nearly all genes involved in nitrogen acquisition (Maslać et al., 2022). Therefore, it is rather less probable that MtHCP is used for nitrate assimilation.
If MtHCP physiologically serves as detoxifying NO reductase, one can thus wonder about the NO origin. Methanogens genomes do not harbour genes encoding for the NO-production pathway, such as NO synthase or NO-generating nitrite reductase. An alternative enzyme or pathway would be necessary. Nitrite reduction to ammonia can be performed by methanogens [e.g., by the F420-dependent sulfite/nitrite reductase (Jespersen et al., 2023)]. The enzymatic reduction of nitrite may, in theory, be a source of NO, similar to the nitrate reducers. Under these growing conditions, M. thermolithotrophicus does not have any exogenous nitrite source and therefore NO-production as a side product of nitrite reduction would depend on an endogenous nitrite source (e.g., by the anabolism), incoherent with the abundance of the HCP in the cytoplasm. An abiotic chemical reaction might occur in the sulfidic and metal-rich medium at 60°C as a source of nitrite or NO. However, numerous methanogens, including mesophilic species, contain a gene coding for HCP (class I or III). The protein was also shown to be relatively abundant in mesophilic Bacillota growing with ammonium as a nitrogen source (Valgepea et al., 2018). In the case of methanogens and other anaerobes, the natural abundance of the protein is, therefore, inadequate with the apparent absence of a notable biological or abiotic NO source. Either a source of NO escapes our understanding, or the HCP has an anabolic function more important and possibly more ancient than initially thought. Nitrate/nitrite-reducing organisms and pathogens would then have acquired or derived HCP to survive the NO concentrations encountered in situ. The HCPs from Desulfovibrio species accordingly branch separately in the bacterial HCP phylogenetic tree, which could indicate more recent inter-bacteria horizontal gene transfers (Supplementary Figure S11). Protein nitrosylation would be a plausible function for HCP in other anaerobes, yet it has not been shown to occur in archaea to our knowledge. Future studies will answer if protein nitrosylation has an important role in archaea and if the HCP is still involved in this process. Genetically tractable methanogens such as Methanococcus maripaludis (Susanti et al., 2019) or Methanosarcina acetivorans (Nayak and Metcalf, 2017) would be an appropriate tool for assessing this question.
4.3. Electron donors of the HCP
The electron donor for the reaction is unknown in class I HCPs. In contrast, the HCP reductase is the physiological partner of class II, providing the electrons for the reaction via NADH oxidation (Wang et al., 2016). Fujishiro and colleagues exemplified a possible role of the N-terminal insertion that would serve as a docking site to bind the HCP reductase in EcHCP class II (Figure 2; Fujishiro et al., 2021). MtHCP and its structural homologues do not present this extension or anything similar, and no gene coding for an HCP reductase exists in the organism. As is often the case for classes I and III HCPs, MtHCP is encoded by an isolated gene with no related genes in the nearby genomic environment, which gives no indication of a putative partner. The systematic absence of other genes in synteny with hcp can be seen as an argument towards the involvement of a general electron donor. The reduced to semi oxidised state transition of the hybrid cluster exhibits a redox potential ranging from −250 to −150 mV in HCP class I, significantly lower than in class II (van Lis et al., 2020; Hagen, 2022). Assuming a similar redox potential in MtHCP and approximately 40 mV lower potential for the [4Fe-4S] electron transferring cluster (van Lis et al., 2020), the enzyme reduction would be exergonic with NAD(P)H [E0´ = −320 mV (Walsh, 1986)] but also various substrates and electron shuttles of M. thermolithotrophicus such as ferredoxin [physiological potential approximately −500 mV (Schuchmann and Müller, 2014)] or F420 [E0´ = −360 mV (Walsh, 1986)]. If the HCP reduction by ferredoxin would be largely exergonic, it would also represent a substantial energy loss, improbable in such an energy-limited organism, whilst coupling the reaction with NAD(P)H and F420H2 would require an oxidase partner.
The role of the hydrated polar cavity connecting the cubane [4Fe-4S] cluster to the surface is unknown. Using soluble molecules that would deliver electrons directly to the cluster would require a catalytic mechanism that has not been described yet. Since such cubane clusters are considered to serve as electron relays rather than catalytic centres, this hypothesis is unlikely. Furthermore, a similar cavity is present in EcHCP that is reduced by another protein (Figure 2). It could also affect the structural stabilisation or regulation of enzyme activity.
5. Conclusion
The last years of research highlighted the NO reductase activity of HCP, used for NO detoxification and protein nitrosylation. If this is in perfect agreement with the enzyme production during nitrate and nitrite reduction or a defence mechanism during pathogenicity, its role is elusive in bacteria and archaea growing without nitrate, nitrite, or any specific source of NO. That is the case of the methanogen M. thermolithotrophicus, abundantly producing its HCP. The structural characterisation of this enzyme highlighted a striking similarity with bacterial enzymes, and for a good reason: HCPs from Methanococcales are closest to bacterial HCPs than to any others. As the growth conditions contain no apparent source of NO, it is plausible that the HCP is not used for NO detoxification but rather for an important and overlooked function in the anabolism of methanogens and probably in acetogens or other Bacillota species. Future genetic studies on model organisms will have to pursue this quest to extend the physiological role of HCPs in anaerobes.
Data availability statement
The data presented in the study are deposited in the PDB repository, accession number 8CNR and 8CNS.
Author contributions
OL and TW designed the research, collected the X-ray data, solved the structures, built the models, and analysed the structures. OL purified and crystallised the proteins. MB performed the activity measurements, electrophoreses, and size-exclusion chromatography experiments. OL and MB performed the bioinformatics analyses. All authors participated in the manuscript writing.
Funding
This study was funded by the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft priority programme 1927, “Iron-Sulfur for Life” WA 4053/1-1.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology and the Max Planck Society for their continuous support. We also thank Christina Probian and Ramona Appel for their continuous support in the Microbial Metabolism laboratory and Marion Jespersen for the cultivation of the biomass used in this study and for carrying out the first purification step. We thank Dennis Jakob for his contribution to the project. We thank the Swiss Light Source and DESY Synchrotrons and especially the staff of beamline PXIII from SLS and P11 at PETRA III.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1179204/full#supplementary-material
Footnotes
References
Adam, P. S., Borrel, G., Brochier-Armanet, C., and Gribaldo, S. (2017). The growing tree of Archaea: new perspectives on their diversity, evolution and ecology. ISME J. 11, 2407–2425. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.122
Almeida, C. C., Romão, C. V., Lindley, P. F., Teixeira, M., and Saraiva, L. M. (2006). The role of the hybrid cluster protein in oxidative stress defense. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 32445–32450. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605888200
Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schäffer, A. A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., et al. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
Aragão, D., Macedo, S., Mitchell, E. P., Romão, C. V., Liu, M. Y., Frazão, C., et al. (2003). Reduced hybrid cluster proteins (HCP) from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ATCC 27774 and Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Hildenborough): X-ray structures at high resolution using synchrotron radiation. J. Biol. Inorganic Chem. 8, 540–548. doi: 10.1007/s00775-003-0443-x
Aragão, D., Mitchell, E. P., Frazão, C. F., Carrondo, M. A., and Lindley, P. F. (2008). Structural and functional relationships in the hybrid cluster protein family: structure of the anaerobically purified hybrid cluster protein from Desulfovibrio vulgaris at 1.35 Å resolution. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 64, 665–674. doi: 10.1107/S0907444908009165
Belay, N., Jung, K.-Y., Rajagopal, B. S., Kremer, J. D., and Daniels, L. (1990). Nitrate as a sole nitrogen source for Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus and its effect on growth of several methanogenic bacteria. Curr. Microbiol. 21, 193–198. doi: 10.1007/BF02092121
Beliaev, A. S., Klingeman, D. M., Klappenbach, J. A., Wu, L., Romine, M. F., Tiedje, J. M., et al. (2005). Global transcriptome analysis of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 exposed to different terminal electron acceptors. J. Bacteriol. 187, 7138–7145. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.20.7138-7145.2005
Biester, A., Dementin, S., and Drennan, C. L. (2022). Visualizing the gas channel of a monofunctional carbon monoxide dehydrogenase. J. Inorg. Biochem. 230:111774. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2022.111774
Briolat, V., and Reysset, G. (2002). Identification of the Clostridium perfringens genes involved in the adaptive response to oxidative stress. J. Bacteriol. 184, 2333–2343. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.9.2333-2343.2002
Bulot, S., Audebert, S., Pieulle, L., Seduk, F., Baudelet, E., Espinosa, L., et al. (2019). Clustering as a means to control nitrate respiration efficiency and toxicity in Escherichia coli. mBio 10:e01832-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01832-19
Cabello, P., Pino, C., Olmo-Mira, M. F., Castillo, F., Roldán, M. D., and Moreno-Vivián, C. (2004). Hydroxylamine assimilation by Rhodobacter capsulatus E1F1. Requirement of the hcp gene (hybrid cluster protein) located in the nitrate assimilation nas gene region for hydroxylamine reduction. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 45485–45494. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M404417200
Cadby, I. T., Faulkner, M., Cheneby, J., Long, J., van Helden, J., Dolla, A., et al. (2017). Coordinated response of the Desulfovibrio desulfuricans 27774 transcriptome to nitrate, nitrite and nitric oxide. Sci. Rep. 7:16228. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16403-4
Chen, V. B., Arendall, W. B. 3rd, Headd, J. J., Keedy, D. A., Immormino, R. M., Kapral, G. J., et al. (2010). Mol Probity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909042073
Cole, J. A. (2021). Anaerobic bacterial response to nitric oxide stress: widespread misconceptions and physiologically relevant responses. Mol. Microbiol. 116, 29–40. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14713
Cooper, S. J., Garner, C. D., Hagen, W. R., Lindley, P. F., and Bailey, S. (2000). Hybrid-cluster protein (HCP) from Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Hildenborough) at 1.6 Å resolution. Biochemistry 39, 15044–15054. doi: 10.1021/bi001483m
Edgar, R. C. (2004). MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformat. 5:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G., and Cowtan, K. (2010). Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493
Faeder, E. J., Davis, P. S., and Siegel, L. M. (1974). Reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-sulfite reductase of enterobacteria: V. STUDIES WITH THE ESCHERICHIA COLI HEMOFLAVOPROTEIN DEPLETED OF FLAVIN MONONUCLEOTIDE: DISTINCT ROLES FOR THE FLAVIN ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE AND FLAVIN MONONUCLEOTIDE PROSTHETIC GROUPS IN CATALYSIS. J. Biol. Chem. 249, 1599–1609. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42923-2
Filenko, N. A., Browning, D. F., and Cole, J. A. (2005). Transcriptional regulation of a hybrid cluster (prismane) protein. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33, 195–197. doi: 10.1042/BST0330195
Filenko, N., Spiro, S., Browning, D. F., Squire, D., Overton, T. W., Cole, J., et al. (2007). The NsrR regulon of Escherichia coli K-12 includes genes encoding the hybrid cluster protein and the periplasmic, respiratory nitrite reductase. J. Bacteriol. 189, 4410–4417. doi: 10.1128/JB.00080-07
Fujishiro, T., Ooi, M., and Takaoka, K. (2021). Crystal structure of Escherichia coli class II hybrid cluster protein, HCP, reveals a [4Fe-4S] cluster at the N-terminal protrusion. FEBS J. 288, 6752–6768. doi: 10.1111/febs.16062
Fujishiro, T., and Takaoka, K. (2022). Class III hybrid cluster protein (HCP) from Methanothermobacter marburgensis. Jpn. Soc. Prom. Sci. doi: 10.2210/pdb7E0L/pdb
Gao, S.-H., Ho, J. Y., Fan, L., Nouwens, A., Hoelzle, R. D., Schulz, B., et al. (2019). A comparative proteomic analysis of Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough in response to the antimicrobial agent free nitrous acid. Sci. Total Environ. 672, 625–633. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.442
Hagen, W. R. (2019). EPR spectroscopy of putative enzyme intermediates in the NO reductase and the auto-nitrosylation reaction of Desulfovibrio vulgaris hybrid cluster protein. FEBS Lett. 593, 3075–3083. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13539
Hagen, W. R. (2022). Structure and function of the hybrid cluster protein. Coord. Chem. Rev. 457:214405. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214405
Hagen, W. R., Pierik, A. J., and Veeger, C. (1989). Novel electron paramagnetic resonance signals from an Fe/S protein containing six iron atoms. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 85, 4083–4090.
Hagen, W. R., van den Berg, W. A., van Dongen, W. M., Reijerse, E. J., and van Kan, P. J. (1998). EPR spectroscopy of biological iron–sulfur clusters with spin-admixed S= 3/2. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 94, 2969–2973. doi: 10.1039/a803059f
Haveman, S. A., Greene, E. A., Stilwell, C. P., Voordouw, J. K., and Voordouw, G. (2004). Physiological and gene expression analysis of inhibition of Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough by nitrite. J. Bacteriol. 186, 7944–7950. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.23.7944-7950.2004
He, Q., Huang, K. H., He, Z., Alm, E. J., Fields, M. W., Hazen, T. C., et al. (2006). Energetic consequences of nitrite stress in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough, inferred from global transcriptional analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 4370–4381. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02609-05
Heo, J., Wolfe, M. T., Staples, C. R., and Ludden, P. W. (2002). Converting the NiFeS carbon monoxide dehydrogenase to a hydrogenase and a hydroxylamine reductase. J. Bacteriol. 184, 5894–5897. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.21.5894-5897.2002
Jarrell, K. F., and Sprott, G. D. (1981). The transmembrane electrical potential and intracellular pH in methanogenic bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 27, 720–728. doi: 10.1139/m81-110
Jeanthon, C., L’Haridon, S., Reysenbach, A. L., Vernet, M., Messner, P., Sleytr, U. B., et al. (1998). Methanococcus infernus sp. nov., a novel hyperthermophilic lithotrophic methanogen isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 48, 913–919.
Jeoung, J.-H., Fesseler, J., Domnik, L., Klemke, F., Sinnreich, M., Teutloff, C., et al. (2022). A morphing [4Fe-3S-nO]-cluster within a carbon monoxide dehydrogenase scaffold. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61:e202117000. doi: 10.1002/anie.202117000
Jespersen, M., Pierik, A. J., and Wagner, T. (2023). Structures of the sulfite detoxifying F420-dependent enzyme from Methanococcales. Nat. Chem. Biol. doi: 10.1038/s41589-022-01232-y
Kim, C. C., Monack, D., and Falkow, S. (2003). Modulation of virulence by two acidified nitrite-responsive loci of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. Infect. Immun. 71, 3196–3205. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.6.3196-3205.2003
Klüber, H. D., and Conrad, R. (1998). Inhibitory effects of nitrate, nitrite, NO and N2O on methanogenesis by Methanosarcina barkeri and Methanobacterium bryantii. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 25, 331–339. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6496(97)00102-5
Kozlikova, B., Sebestova, E., Sustr, V., Brezovsky, J., Strnad, O., Daniel, L., et al. (2014). CAVER analyst 1.0: graphic tool for interactive visualization and analysis of tunnels and channels in protein structures. Bioinformatics 30, 2684–2685. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu364
Krissinel, E., and Henrick, K. (2004). Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2256–2268. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904026460
Kröckel, M., Trautwein, A. X., Arendsen, A. F., and Hagen, W. R. (1998). The prismane protein resolved--Mössbauer investigation of a 4Fe cluster with an unusual mixture of bridging ligands and metal coordinations. Eur. J. Biochem. 251, 454–461. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2510454.x
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., and Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096
Lemaire, O. N., Infossi, P., Ali Chaouche, A., Espinosa, L., Leimkühler, S., Giudici-Orticoni, M. T., et al. (2018). Small membranous proteins of the TorE/NapE family, crutches for cognate respiratory systems in Proteobacteria. Sci. Rep. 8:13576. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31851-2
Lemaire, O. N., and Wagner, T. (2021). Gas channel rerouting in a primordial enzyme: structural insights of the carbon-monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase complex from the acetogen Clostridium autoethanogenum. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1862:148330. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2020.148330
Liebschner, D., Afonine, P. V., Baker, M. L., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Croll, T. I., et al. (2019). Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 75, 861–877. doi: 10.1107/S2059798319011471
Macedo, S., Aragão, D., Mitchell, E. P., and Lindley, P. (2003). Structure of the hybrid cluster protein (HCP) from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ATCC 27774 containing molecules in the oxidized and reduced states. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 59, 2065–2071. doi: 10.1107/S0907444903025861
Macedo, S., Mitchell, E. P., Romão, C. V., Cooper, S. J., Coelho, R., Liu, M. Y., et al. (2002). Hybrid cluster proteins (HCPs) from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ATCC 27774 and Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Hildenborough): X-ray structures at 1.25 Å resolution using synchrotron radiation. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 7, 514–525. doi: 10.1007/s00775-001-0326-y
Mager, J. (1960). A TPNH-linked sulfite reductase and its relation to hydroxylamine reductase in Enterobacteriaceae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 41, 553–555. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(60)90065-2
Marritt, S. J., Farrar, J. A., Breton, J. L., Hagen, W. R., and Thomson, A. J. (1995). Characterization of the prismane protein from Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Hildenborough) by low-temperature magnetic circular dichroic spectroscopy. Eur. J. Biochem. 232, 501–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.501zz.x
Maslać, N., Sidhu, C., Teeling, H., and Wagner, T. (2022). Comparative transcriptomics sheds light on remodeling of gene expression during diazotrophy in the thermophilic methanogen Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus. mBio 13:e0244322. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02443-22
Moura, I., Tavares, P., Moura, J. J., Ravi, N., Huynh, B. H., Liu, M. Y., et al. (1992). Direct spectroscopic evidence for the presence of a 6Fe cluster in an iron-sulfur protein isolated from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (ATCC 27774). J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4489–4496. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)42859-1
Nayak, D. D., and Metcalf, W. W. (2017). Cas9-mediated genome editing in the methanogenic archaeon Methanosarcina acetivorans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114, 2976–2981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618596114
Okinaka, Y., Yang, C. H., Perna, N. T., and Keen, N. T. (2002). Microarray profiling of Erwinia chrysanthemi 3937 genes that are regulated during plant infection. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 15, 619–629. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.7.619
Ostrowski, J., Barber, M. J., Rueger, D. C., Miller, B. E., Siegel, L. M., and Kredich, N. M. (1989). Characterization of the flavoprotein moieties of NADPH-sulfite reductase from Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli. Physicochemical and catalytic properties, amino acid sequence deduced from DNA sequence of cysJ, and comparison with NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 15796–15808. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)71547-0
Overeijnder, M. L., Hagen, W. R., and Hagedoorn, P.-L. (2009). A thermostable hybrid cluster protein from Pyrococcus furiosus: effects of the loss of a three helix bundle subdomain. J. Biol. Inorganic Chem. 14, 703–710. doi: 10.1007/s00775-009-0483-y
Pereira, A. S., Tavares, P., Krebs, C., Huynh, B. H., Rusnak, F., Moura, I., et al. (1999). Biochemical and spectroscopic characterization of overexpressed fuscoredoxin from Escherichia coli. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 260, 209–215. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0748
Pierik, A. J., Hagen, W. R., Dunham, W. R., and Sands, R. H. (1992). Multi-frequency EPR and high-resolution Mössbauer spectroscopy of a putative [6Fe-6S] prismane-cluster-containing protein from Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Hildenborough). Characterization of a supercluster and superspin model protein. Eur. J. Biochem. 206, 705–719. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16977.x
Pierik, A. J., Wolbert, R. B., Mutsaers, P. H., Hagen, W. R., and Veeger, C. (1992). Purification and biochemical characterization of a putative [6Fe-6S] prismane-cluster-containing protein from Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Hildenborough). Eur. J. Biochem. 206, 697–704. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16976.x
Robert, X., and Gouet, P. (2014). Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W320–W324. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku316
Roos, V., and Klemm, P. (2006). Global gene expression profiling of the asymptomatic bacteriuria Escherichia coli strain 83972 in the human urinary tract. Infect. Immun. 74, 3565–3575. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01959-05
Schuchmann, K., and Müller, V. (2014). Autotrophy at the thermodynamic limit of life: a model for energy conservation in acetogenic bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 809–821. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3365
Seth, D., Hess, D. T., Hausladen, A., Wang, L., Wang, Y.-J., and Stamler, J. S. (2018). A multiplex enzymatic machinery for cellular protein S-nitrosylation. Mol. Cell 69, 451–464.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.12.025
Sievers, F., Wilm, A., Dineen, D., Gibson, T. J., Karplus, K., Li, W., et al. (2011). Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7:539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75
Spiro, S. (2007). Regulators of bacterial responses to nitric oxide. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 31, 193–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00061.x
Stokkermans, J. P. W. G., Houba, P. H. J., Pierik, A. J., Hagen, W. R., van Dongen, W. M. A. M., and Veeger, C. (1992). Overproduction of prismane protein in Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Hildenborough): evidence for a second S= 1/2-spin system in the one-electron reduced state. Eur. J. Biochem. 210, 983–988. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb17503.x
Susanti, D., Frazier, M. C., and Mukhopadhyay, B. (2019). A genetic system for Methanocaldococcus jannaschii: an evolutionary deeply rooted hyperthermophilic methanarchaeon. Front. Microbiol. :1256:10. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01256
Tavares, P., Pereira, A. S., Krebs, C., Ravi, N., Moura, J. J., Moura, I., et al. (1998). Spectroscopic characterization of a novel tetranuclear Fe cluster in an iron-sulfur protein isolated from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Biochemistry 37, 2830–2842. doi: 10.1021/bi9723008
Tickle, IJ, Flensburg, C, Keller, P, Paciorek, W, Sharff, A, Vonrhein, C, et al. STARANISO (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Global Phasing), (2018).
Usón, I., and Sheldrick, G. (2018). An introduction to experimental phasing of macromolecules illustrated by SHELX; new autotracing features. Acta Crystallogr. Sec. D Struct. Biol. 74, 106–116. doi: 10.1107/S2059798317015121
Valgepea, K., De Souza Pinto Lemgruber, R., Abdalla, T., Binos, S., Takemori, N., Takemori, A., et al. (2018). H2 drives metabolic rearrangements in gas-fermenting Clostridium autoethanogenum. Biotechnol. Biofuels 11:55. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1052-9
van den Berg, W. A., Hagen, W. R., and van Dongen, W. M. (2000). The hybrid-cluster protein (‘prismane protein’) from Escherichia coli. Characterization of the hybrid-cluster protein, redox properties of the [2Fe-2S] and [4Fe-2S-2O] clusters and identification of an associated NADH oxidoreductase containing FAD and [2Fe-2S]. Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 666–676. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01032.x
van den Berg, W. A., Stevens, A. A., Verhagen, M. F., van Dongen, W. M., and Hagen, W. R. (1994). Overproduction of the prismane protein from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ATCC 27774 in Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Hildenborough) and EPR spectroscopy of the [6Fe-6S] cluster in different redox states. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Protein Struct. Mol. Enzymol. 1206, 240–246. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(94)90214-3
van Lis, R., Brugière, S., Baffert, C., Couté, Y., Nitschke, W., and Atteia, A. (2020). Hybrid cluster proteins in a photosynthetic microalga. FEBS J. 287, 721–735. doi: 10.1111/febs.15025
Vonrhein, C., Flensburg, C., Keller, P., Sharff, A., Smart, O., Paciorek, W., et al. (2011). Data processing and analysis with the autoPROC toolbox. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 67, 293–302. doi: 10.1107/S0907444911007773
Walsh, C. (1986). Naturally occurring 5-deazaflavin coenzymes: biological redox roles. Acc. Chem. Res. 19, 216–221. doi: 10.1021/ar00127a004
Wang, Y., Cai, X., Fan, J., Wang, D., and Mao, Y. (2022). Transcriptome analysis provides new insights into the tolerance and aerobic reduction of Shewanella decolorationis Ni1-3 to bromate. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 106, 4749–4761. doi: 10.1007/s00253-022-12006-w
Wang, J., Vine, C. E., Balasiny, B. K., Rizk, J., Bradley, C. L., Tinajero-Trejo, M., et al. (2016). The roles of the hybrid cluster protein, Hcp and its reductase, Hcr, in high affinity nitric oxide reduction that protects anaerobic cultures of Escherichia coli against nitrosative stress. Mol. Microbiol. 100, 877–892. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13356
Winn, M. D., Ballard, C. C., Cowtan, K. D., Dodson, E. J., Emsley, P., Evans, P. R., et al. (2011). Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235–242. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910045749
Wolfe, M. T., Heo, J., Garavelli, J. S., and Ludden, P. W. (2002). Hydroxylamine reductase activity of the hybrid cluster protein from Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 184, 5898–5902. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.21.5898-5902.2002
Yu, Z., Pesesky, M., Zhang, L., Huang, J., Winkler, M., and Chistoserdova, L. (2020). A complex interplay between nitric oxide, quorum sensing, and the unique secondary metabolite tundrenone constitutes the hypoxia response in Methylobacter. mSystems 5:e00770-19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00770-19
Yurkiw, M. A., Voordouw, J., and Voordouw, G. (2012). Contribution of rubredoxin: oxygen oxidoreductases and hybrid cluster proteins of Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough to survival under oxygen and nitrite stress. Environ. Microbiol. 14, 2711–2725. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02859.x
Keywords: methanogenic archaea (MA), hybrid cluster protein, anaerobic biochemistry, structural biology, metalloenzyme active site, internal channel, nitric oxide
Citation: Lemaire ON, Belhamri M and Wagner T (2023) Structural and biochemical elucidation of class I hybrid cluster protein natively extracted from a marine methanogenic archaeon. Front. Microbiol. 14:1179204. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1179204
Edited by:
Michel Geovanni Santiago-Martínez, University of Connecticut, United StatesReviewed by:
Jose Munoz, Northumbria University, United KingdomSergio Romero Romero, University of Bayreuth, Germany
Copyright © 2023 Lemaire, Belhamri and Wagner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Olivier N. Lemaire, b2xlbWFpcmVAbXBpLWJyZW1lbi5kZQ==; Tristan Wagner, dHdhZ25lckBtcGktYnJlbWVuLmRl