Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 07 June 2023
Sec. Evolutionary and Genomic Microbiology

Phenotypic and genetic features of a novel clinically isolated rough morphotype Candida auris

\r\nSufei Tian&#x;Sufei Tian1†Jian Bing&#x;Jian Bing2†Yunzhuo Chu&#x;Yunzhuo Chu1†Hailong LiHailong Li1Qihui WangQihui Wang1Shitong ChengShitong Cheng1Jingjing ChenJingjing Chen1Hong Shang*Hong Shang1*
  • 1National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Introduction: Candida auris is a newly emerging pathogenic fungus of global concern and has been defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a member of the critical group of the most health-threatening fungi.

Methods: This study reveals and reports for the first time that a rough morphotype C. auris strain causes urinary tract infections in non-intensive care unit (ICU) inpatients. Furthermore, the morphology, the scanning electronmicroscopy (SEM), Whole-genome resequencing and RNA sequencing of C. auris possessing rough morphotype colonies compared to their smooth morphotype counterparts.

Results: The newly identified phenotypic variation of C. auris appears round, convex, dry, and burr-like with a rough texture. SEM shows that rough type C. auris has a rough and uneven colony surface with radial wrinkles and irregular spore arrangement. Cells of the rough morphotype C. auris naturally aggregate into clusters with tight connections in the liquid, and it seems that the cell division is incomplete. A genome-wide analysis of the rough type C. auris confirmed its genetic association with the smooth type of C. auris prevalent in China (Shenyang) two years ago; however, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mutations of five genes (ACE2, IFF6, RER2, UTP20, and CaO19.5847) were identified more recently. RNA-seq revealed IFF2/HYR3, DAL5, PSA31, and SIT1 were notably up-regulated, while multiple cell wall-associated genes (ALS1, MNN1, PUL1, DSE1, SCW11, PGA38, RBE1, FGR41, BGLI, GIT3, CEP3, and SAP2) were consistently down-regulated in rough morphotype C. auris.

Discussion: The rough phenotypic variation of C. auris is likely to be related to the structural and functional changes in cell wall proteins. This novel rough morphotype C. auris will provide a basis for further studies concerning the evolutionary characteristics of C. auris.

Introduction

Candida auris is a newly emerging pathogenic fungus of global concern. On October 25, 2022, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a list of the WHO fungal priority pathogens (WHO FPPL)1. Among them, C. auris was ranked in the Critical group as one of the most health-threatening fungi. C. auris, an aggressive and drug-resistant type of yeast, has high outbreak potential (Eyre et al., 2018), and this fungus is notoriously difficult to diagnose via using conventional techniques. To make matters worse, it has been suggested that C. auris can exhibit three colony types on CHROMagar: (1) pink, (2) white, and (3) sectored (dark purple), and varying amounts of phenotypic switching that can potentially interfere with correct identification (Bentz et al., 2018). However, C. auris colonies that have been reported were smooth and glossy without textural changes. In this study, we present a description of a rare case of C. auris with rough morphotype colonies. Further in-depth study of phenotypic characteristics and microscopic characteristics using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) will help to enrich our understanding of the morphological characteristics of C. auris.

Given that C. auris that we previously studied were smooth morphotype colonies (Tian et al., 2018, 2021), we asked whether these natural variant strains of C. auris with rough colonies evolved independently with smooth colonies and what else is unique about their genetics. These questions are very interestingly scientific queries. Thus, this study intendes to conduct comparative genomics studies between rough and smooth morphotype of C. auris that had been isolated in the previous study.

Moreover, we still lack molecular mechanistic knowledge about the C. auris species phenotypic diversification and clinical heterogeneity. Since gene expression variability impacts phenotypic plasticity (Jenull et al., 2021), we aim to characterize transcriptomic signatures of C. auris isolates with a distinct phenotype (rough morphotype colonies versus smooth morphotype colonies). This study will advance our understanding the genetic characteristics and species diversification of C. auris.

Materials and methods

First case of C. auris with rough morphotype colony

An 86 years-old man was hospitalized in the respiratory infection ward (RI) on October 31, 2018 with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that was further complicated by respiratory failure. This patient was previously admitted to the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) from November 4 to 15, 2016.

Due to the patient’s medical history including diabetes mellitus and prostate hyperplasia without indwelling catheterization, the urinanalysis result was notable for a WBC 909.09/HPF (Reference range: 0.11–2.83/HPF) on the date of RI admission. In addition, the WBC count was 6.65 × 109/L (Reference range: 3.5–9.5 × 109/L), the ratio of neutrophils was 63.8% (Reference range: 40–75%) and the blood CRP was 3.8 mg/L (Reference range: 0–5 mg/L), respectively. Cefotaxime sulbactam (4.5 g, twice a day) was administrated empirically for 2 weeks considering the concomitant urinary tract infection. On November 7th, there was no significantly reduction of WBC count according to the urinary examination. The urine bacterial culture was negative; however, the rough morphotype colony of C. aruis was isolated on the Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) plates for the first time and the colony count was approximate 1 × 103. Physician suspected that C. auris colonies as small amount of fungi might be colonization or environmental contamination, so no special treatment was administrated targeting the C. auris colonies. The antibiotics were adjusted to Cefoperazone sulbactam (1 g, three times a day) or Levofloxacin (500 mg, one a day) for 7 18 days but showed no significant improvement. During the treatment, the urianalyses were ordered multiple times and the WBC results were still elevated (117.38–5602.05/HPF). Multiple midstream clean-catch urine cultures were negative for bacteria, but determined C. auris with rough morphotype colony with a colony count of 102∼103 colony forming units (cfu)/mL on Days 7, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 24 (Shown in Table 1). The CRP was 5.5 mg/L on November 11th and the serum (1, 3)-β-D-glucan level was <10 pg/mL on November 18th 2018, respectively. On November 24th, 2018 (Day 24), antifungal therapy was initiated with oral voriconazole (200 mg, twice daily). Four consecutive negative urine cultures were noted on day 27 and the urinary leukocytes were significantly reduced (9.95–11.96/HPF). This patient was then discharged on Day 36.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Urine culture and urinalysis of this patient presenting with Candida auris infection during hospitalization.

Strains identification and antifungal susceptibility tests

C. auris strains were grown in SDA and CHROMagar Candida medium (CHROMagar, Paris, France). Liquid cultures were inoculated in yeast–peptone–dextrose (YPD) liquid medium (1% yeast extract, 2% bactopeptone, 2% glucose). Yeast extract, bactopeptone and glucose were purchased from HopeBio Company. Calcofluor White staining solution was purchased from Sigma. Final concentration of 10 μg/ml Calcofluor White solution was added into cells and incubated for 10 min in dark, cells were observed by fluorescent microscopy. For salt resistance test, C. aurs strains were incubated on YPD-agar plates with different NaCl concentrations of 10, 12, 15% (w/v) at 37°C for 24 h∼48 h, and then check the growth. All C. auris isolates were identified using the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) (VITEK-MS system) with the RUO database. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed using the Sensititre YeastOne colorimetric micro-dilution method (Thermo Fisher scientific) as described previously (Tian et al., 2021).

Scanning electron microscopy

For cultured samples, a scalpel blade was used to remove a whole yeast colony with 5 mm of the surrounding agar from the culture plate as described previously (Radford et al., 1994). The sample was plunged into liquid nitrogen, frozen for 2 min, removed carefully, and then placed on a pre-cooled stainless steel dissection plate. Next, the sample was transferred using a refrigerated transfer system PP3010T (Quorum). The samples were coated with platinum and viewed by SEM (Hitachi Regulus 8100) at 5 kV. For liquid samples, after washing with ddH2O, 1 × 105 cells of C. auris were dropped into filter paper. The other steps were described above.

Whole-genome resequencing

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed using the Illumina NovaSeq platform (by Berry Genomics Co., Beijing, China) as described previously (Tian et al., 2021). The variants that were predicted to alter the protein sequence in any coding sequence [non-synonymous single nucleotide variants (SNVs), stop loss or gain variants, indels] were annotated by ANNOVAR software (Wang et al., 2010) using the RefSeq C. auris B11221 coding sequence.2

Phylogenetic analysis C. auris with rough morphotype colony

In order to determine the evolutionary relationship between the smooth and rough morphotype of C. auris, we selected two rough morphotypes (RI A112 and RI A114) from one patient and previously isolated smooth morphotypes from different patients in our hospital [see previous studies for details (Tian et al., 2021)]. The genetic evolution analysis involved 116 SNP sites of 39 strains. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the maximum likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model (Tamura and Nei, 1993). All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. A total of 116 positions in the final dataset were obtained. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7 (Kumar et al., 2016). The phylogenetic tree was constructed and composed by iTOL software.3

RNA sequencing

The strains that underwent transcriptomic profiling included two rough morphotype colonies of C. auris (RI A112 and RI A114) and a smooth morphotype colony of C. auris (RICU A1), which was the first strain identified in Shenyang (China). RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis was performed using the Illumina NovaSeq platform (Berry Genomics Co., Beijing, China). C. auris cultures grown overnight were inoculated into YPD medium. Total RNA was purified using a GeneJET RNA purification kit (Thermo Scientific). The quality of RNA was assessed on a bioanalyzer using the RNA6000 Nanochip (Agilent), mRNA was enriched using oligo (dT) beads [New England BioLabs (NEB)], and subsequently, double-stranded cDNA libraries were generated using the NEBNext Ultra directional RNA library prep kit for Illumina (NEB) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The qualified libraries were subjected to Illumina sequencing with 150 bp paired-end reads at the Novogene sequencing facility. Three biological replicates for each strain were sequenced.

Samples were sequenced on the platform, and the original data in FASTQ format (Raw Data) were generated. In the data mapping analysis, the reference genome (C. auris B11221) and gene annotation files were downloaded from genome website. The reference genome index was constructed by Bowtie2 (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012), and the filtered reads were mapped to the reference genome using HISAT2 (Siren et al., 2014). We then used HTSeq (Anders et al., 2015) statistics to compare the Read Count values on each gene as the original expression of the gene, and then used fragments per kilobase of exon model per million reads (FPKM) to standardize the expression. We then used DESeq (Anders and Huber, 2010) to analyze the genes of difference expression with screened conditions consisting of expression difference multiple | log2FoldChange| > 1, and a significant adjusted p-value < 0.05. At the same time, we used R language Pheatmap software package to perform bi-directional clustering analysis of all different genes of samples. Next, we used topGO to map all genes to terms in the Gene Ontology (GO) database and calculated the numbers of differentially enriched genes in each term based on hypergeometric distribution. In addition, the “annotation module” of the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Orthology Based Annotation System (KOBAS) (Bu et al., 2021) was applied to conduct the annotation of some specific genes that have no characterized homolog of C. albicans in the Swissprot databases.

Results

Microbiological characteristics of C. auris with rough morphotype colonies

On SDA plates, the rough morphotype C. auris cultured at 35°C for 24 h and grew 1 mm tiny colonies that appeared round, convex, dry, and burr-like with rough texture. Colonies were uniform after 3 days and gradually grew into white colonies with a central bulge, surrounding wheel-shaped radiation folds, and uneven edges (Figure 1). Rough pink colonies appear on the Chromogenic media (CHROM agar) (Figure 1 R2). As with the smooth morphotype C. auris, the rough strain exhibits high temperature resistance (grew well at 28–42°C with weak growth at 45°C) and salt resistance (grew well in 10–12% NaCl, but poorly in 15% NaCl). It was viable in 0.05% cycloheximide. The phenotype of rough type C. auris was hereditable and was retained even after 30 passages at room temperature for more than half a year.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Photo of rough morphotype Candida auris colonies grown on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) medium and Chromogenic media (CHROM agar), smooth counterparts as controls. The microscopy of the cells of rough morphotype C. auris under differential interference contrast (DIC) and the Calcofluor White stain. As described in Materials and methods, final concentration of 10 μg/ml Calcofluor White solution was added into cells and incubated for 10 min in dark, cells were observed by fluorescent microscopy. DIC photos of C. auris cells and Calcofluor White stain, smooth counterparts as controls.

Microscopic observation [Differential interference contrast (DIC)] showed yeast cells of the rough morphotype C. auris often aggregated into clusters in the natural state (liquid culture is easy to precipitate), appeared as round spores with a chain-like arrangement and close connections among spores (Figure 1). Based on microscopy of Calcofluor white staining, the cells of rough morphotype C. auris were found to naturally clump together with tightly connected spores (Figure 1).

All rough morphotype C. auris isolates were resistant to fluconazole and sensitive to voriconazole, itraconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin (Tian et al., 2021). No differences between all rough morphotype C. auris isolates and smooth morphotype C. auris isolates were found (Tian et al., 2021).

Comparison of scanning electron microscopy of C. auris with rough morphotype colonies and smooth morphotype colonies

To thoroughly identify the differences between rough and smooth morphotype C. auris, SEM was employed, which showed that the colony surface of C. auris was rough and uneven and had radial wrinkles, and the arrangement of spore was irregular. The cells of the rough morphotype C. auris were closely connected in the liquid, and most cells with rough morphotype appearance were connected at septa. It appears that budding daughter cells could not detach from the mother cells, resulting in incomplete division (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Electron microscopy scan photos with a single C. auris colony on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) medium, which was cultured at 35°C for 3 days. Frozen transmission (liquid nitrogen) the whole process (rough morphotype Ra/Rb/Rc; smooth morphotype Sa/Sb/Sc). C. auris was cultured in Yeast–peptide_dextrpsse (YPD) liquid medium at 35°C for 3 days and then washed in ddH2O, after which 1 × 105 cells of C. auris were dropped on filter paper and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Electron microscopy was performed and photos were obtained (rough morphotype Rd/Re/Rf; smooth morphotype Sd/Se/Sf).

Phylogenetic analysis of 39 clinically isolated C. auris

To decipher the evolution of the rough morphotype C. auris, we performed phylogenetic analysis with the previously isolated strains (Tian et al., 2021), the results of which showed all C. auris from the RICU were related to RICU A1, the first specimen isolated from this facility, and rough morphotype C. auris (RI 112 and RI 114) belongs to the same subclade as RICU4 A7, RICU6 A14, RICU5 A12, and RICU17 A108.

Interestingly, the RI A112 and RI A114-isolated patient had a medical history in RICU in 2016; at that time, RICU17 and RICU5 patients were also admitted in this department. Thus, we speculated that the rough morphotypes were originated from the smooth morphotypes due to the spatial and temporal crossover, though they were from different patients. According to the phylogenic analysis, we found that the two rough types of C. auris (RI_A112 and RI_A114) were the most closely genetically associated with the smooth type of C. auris (RICU17_A108 and RICU5_A12), which were isolated in December, 2016. This finding corresponds to our “spatial time crossover” hypothesis, suggesting that rough types of C. auris may be evolutionarily close to the smooth type of C. auris. The above data support that C. auris with rough type colonies most likely originated from the smooth type of C. auris rather than having an independent origin (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Molecular phylogenetic analysis and other relevant information. All C. auris strains were isolated from our hospital. The tree was generated using the maximum-likelihood method using MEGA7. The phylogenetic tree was constructed and composed by iTOL software. Among a total of 39 samples, 37 samples were from the smooth type of C. auris, and two were from rough types of C. auris (RI A112 and RI A114). The branches and the sample names with rough types of C. auris and related closely related ones are shown in red. Each sample corresponds to a mark in the phenotype, source, isolation date, nucleotide mutation site, and amino acid variation in parentheses. RICU, respiratory ICU; NICU, neurosciences ICU; NSICU, neurosurgical ICU; SICU, surgical ICU; RI, respiratory infection.

In the whole genome sequence analysis of C. auris with rough morphotype colonies versus smooth morphotype colonies, five genes were found to have non-synonymous mutations. The proteins encoded by five genes corresponding to the homologues of C. albicans were Ace2, Iff6, Rer2, Utp20, and CaO19.5847 (see Figure 3 for details). In another study, CauACE2 was experimentally verified as a key regulator of morphogenesis, and the Δace2 mutant of C. auris resulted in constitutively aggregating cells with individual cells connected at septa, suggestive of a failure of budding daughter cells to separate from the mother cells (Santana and O’Meara, 2021). This process is strikingly similar to the natural aggregating phenotype of C. auris with rough morphotype colonies in this study. Identification Friend or Foe (IFF)6 indicated putative glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins (Boisrame et al., 2011) and is predicted to be an essential gene encoding for an adhesin-like cell wall protein. For C. albicans, cis-prenyltransferase Rer2 is required for protein glycosylation, cell wall integrity, and hypha formation (Juchimiuk et al., 2014). Utp20 is a putative snoRNA-binding protein and is likely essential for growth (Ev et al., 2020).

Comparative transcriptional profiling of C. auris with rough morphotype colonies vs. smooth morphotype colonies

Firstly, we conducted Principal component analysis (PCA) and Cluster analysis of gene expression in rough-type colony vs smooth-type colony groups (Figures 4A, B). Secondly, we performed the GO and KEGG analyses for differential expression genes, which showed a significant enrichment in membrane associated GO terms (Supplementary Figure 1). And then, we performed a pairwise comparison of A1 vs. A112 and found a limited set of 41 upregulated genes and 46 downregulated genes (Figure 4C). while the pairwise comparison of A1 vs. A114 showed 29 upregulated genes and 60 downregulated genes (Figure 4D). The highest upregulated genes included a GPI-anchored cell wall protein Iff2/Hyr3 (Boisrame et al., 2011) and two transmembrane transporters homologous to Saccaharomyces cerevisiae DAL5, which encodes for allantoate permease (Hellborg et al., 2008) and SIT1/ARN1, which encodes for a siderophore iron transporter (Heymann et al., 2002). The most common downregulated genes included the homolog of the C. albicans MNN1, encoding for an alpha-1, 3-mannosyltransferase (Bates et al., 2013), and the homolog of Kluyveromyces lactis LAC12, encoding for lactose permease. In addition, the homologues of S. cerevisiae CBF3 were found to encode for centromere DNA-binding protein complex, and the homologues of C. albicans FGR41, as effector gene in the calcineurin regulon, encode for putative cell wall proteins and mediate masking/unmasking (Wagner et al., 2022).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Pairwise differential expression analysis of A1 vs. A112, and A1 vs. A114. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) of fragments per kilobase of exon model per million reads (FPKM) profiles in rough-type colony vs. smooth-type colony groups. (B) Cluster analysis of patterns of gene expression in rough-type colony vs. smooth-type colony groups. (C) Volcano plot of pairwise differential expression analysis of A1 vs. A112. Fold-change (log2) in A1 versus A112 was plotted against the false discovery rate (FDR). Red dots indicate upregulation and blue dots indicate down-regulation. (D) Volcano plot of pairwise differential expression analysis of A1 versus A114. Fold-change (log2) in A1 versus A114 was plotted against the FDR. Red dots indicate upregulation and blue dots indicate downregulation.

A112 and A114 shared 50 differentially expressed genes in common when compared to the smooth colony group, 18 of which were upregulated and 32 of which were downregulated (Figures 5A, B).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Transcriptomic profiling of rough morphotype colony of C. auris (A112 and A114) vs smooth morphotype colony of C. auris (A1). (A) Venn diagram of the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in rough morphotype colony versus smooth morphotype colony groups. (B) A heatmap of centered and scaled fragments per kilobase of exon model per million reads (FPKM) values of DEGs in rough morphotype colony versus smooth morphotype colony groups.

Among them, the top upregulated genes encompassed the key cell wall proteins, including two homologues of the C. albicans PGA31, linked to chitin assembly during cell wall biogenesis and the maintenance of wall integrity under cellular stress (Plaine et al., 2008).

Most interestingly, two homologues of C. albicans SIT1/ARN1 were upregulated, and four copies were downregulated.

On the other hand, many genes encoding cell wall-related proteins were found to be downregulated (ALS1, MNN1, PUL1, DSE1, SCW11, PGA38, RBE1, FGR41, BGLI, GIT3, CEP3, and SAP2) as shown in Figure 5B. Among them, we noted an interesting phenomenon in this study in which the top downregulated genes, such as homologues of C. albicans MNN1 (Bates et al., 2013) and SAP2, encode for a secreted aspartic protease (Naglik et al., 2003), and in another study, these genes were strikingly upregulated in an azole-resistant isolate of C. auris when compared with the azole-sensitive isolate of C. auris (Jenull et al., 2021). These findings suggest that the two genes may play different roles in regulating differences in drug resistance and phenotypic variation. Moreover, there are four copies of LAC12 in downregulated gene, and the latter has no homologous gene in Candida spp. so its biological function is unknown. In addition, 14 of them have no characterized homolog in the databases.

Discussion

We noted a case of C. auris with an unusual rough morphotype colony phenotype. Different from previous reports of smooth colonies of C. auris (Bentz et al., 2018; Tian et al., 2018), the colony surface of this newly identified C. auris showed a rough texture and was uneven with radial wrinkles. Without in vivo induction through a mammalian host (Yue et al., 2018), the phenotypic switch of rough morphotype C. auris occurs naturally and is stably inherited even after dozens of generations. For previous smooth morphotype C. auris in its natural state, microscopic examination showed round or oval spores with a scattered arrangement, and after 1 min of vortex mixing, some cells could aggregate into clumps, which were not easy to disperse as described in other studies (Borman et al., 2016). The cells of rough morphotype C. auris under the action of no external force clustered together, were arranged in chains, were closely connected between the spores, and naturally aggregated into large clusters in the liquid. Under SEM, we found that most cells with rough morphotype appearance were connected at the septa, and it appeared that budding daughter cells could detach from the mother cells, resulting in incomplete division. As a result, the appearance resulted in a rough colony. Genome-wide comparisons of C. auris with rough and smooth type colony morphologies revealed an amino acid mutation in CAUACE2, a key regulator of morphogenesis (Santana and O’Meara, 2021), has a specific SNP variation and amino acid mutation. Further experiments are needed to confirm whether this particular mutation is associated with the emergence of rough colonies in C. auris.

We speculated that the smooth-rough morphological changes of C. auris appear to be related to cell wall structure and functions. Comparative transcriptional profiling of C. auris with rough morphotype colonies versus smooth morphotype colonies showed that IFF2/HYR3 [GPI-anchored cell wall protein (Boisrame et al., 2011)], DAL5 [encoding for the allantoate permease (Hellborg et al., 2008)], PSA31 [the key GPI-associated cell wall gene (Plaine et al., 2008)], and SIT1 [iron metabolism-associated gene (Heymann et al., 2002)] were strikingly upregulated in rough morphotype C. auris. Among them, PGA31 was reported closely related to chitin assembly during cell wall biogenesis and the maintenance of cell wall integrity under stress (Plaine et al., 2008). Moreover, another study described similar results in which PGA31 was upregulated in filamentous cells (Yue et al., 2018). Furthermore, in recent studies, the monoclonal antibodies prepared by Psa31 could lead to a significant improvement in the survival rate in a series of clinically predictive mouse models of systemic candidiasis of C. albicans, which is expected to be a potential target for therapeutic antibody (Palliyil et al., 2022). In addition, the homologues of C. albicans Hsp21, the novel small heat shock protein, mediates stress adaptation and virulence in C. albicans (Mayer et al., 2012). The top upregulated genes also include the homologues of C. albicans TRX1, encoding for Thioredoxin-1 that can respond specifically to oxidative stress (Enjalbert et al., 2007). Another study confirmed that siderophore uptake mediated by Sitp/Arn1p is required in a specific process during the infection process of humans, namely the infection of epithelial layers (Heymann et al., 2002). Therefore, the function of these genes deserve more attention and further study.

At the same time, many cell wall-related protein coding genes were downregulated. These data strongly supported that the rough phenotypic variation of C. auris is likely to be related to the structural and functional changes in cell wall proteins. Recent studies have shown that switched morphotypes colonies of C. tropicalis have distinct expressions of the cell wall-associated master regulators genes (de Souza et al., 2022).

Furthermore, we tried to trace the origin of the rough morphotype C. auris and were surprised to find that it seemed to be related to the previous smooth morphotype C. auris. The genome-wide analysis of two rough morphotype C. auris had confirmed that it derived from the same lineage as the smooth morphotype C. auris strain isolated from patients who were admitted to the RICU 2 years ago (Tian et al., 2021). This finding should be related to the fact that the patient was once hospitalized in RICU (smooth morphotype C. auris was prevalent in this ICU at that time), and in subsequent follow-up, yeast-like cells had been detected three times (January 26, 2017; October 1, 2017; November 6, 2017) in routine urinalysis. Unfortunately, no urine culture was performed. As a result, we only presumed that this patient may have had C. auris colonization for 2 years, a finding that is very similar to another recent study in which C. auris can cause infections after colonizing the human body for a long time (Heath et al., 2019). Another study confirmed that significant cell aggregation of C. auris in the kidneys of mice with hematogenous disseminated candidiasis occurs, suggesting that the characteristics of cell aggregation may help C. auris escape host immunity and persist in host tissues (Ben-Ami et al., 2017). As we know, morphological plasticity is a common strategy adopted by fungal pathogens and allows rapid adaptation to a harsh environment, survive and thrive in certain host niches. If C. auris colonize within the kidney and urinary system of this patient for 2 years, then to adapt to the high osmotic pressure and high salt environment, a smooth–rough phenotypic transition had very likely occurred. Of course, this is just speculation and needs to be confirmed in animal models in which rough morphotype C. auris would be beneficial to immune escape and long-term colonization.

In addition, we described in detail a case with a low-grade disease manifesting as a urinary tract infection caused by C. auris with rough morphotype colonies. In general, C. auris strains isolated from urine specimens are usually considered to be asymptomatic urogenital colonization (Govender et al., 2018). However, this patient was diagnosed with urinary tract infection caused by C. auris, based on several findings: (1) several urine routine tests indicated continuous elevated leukocytes, (2) multiple midstream urine cultures were negative for bacteria and systematic antibacterial treatment failed, (3) detection of C. auris in six urine cultures, and (4) the fact that antifungal therapy was effective. Moreover, diabetes mellitus and prostate hyperplasia in elderly patients lead to an increase in the risk of developing urinary tract infections. Since C. auris is known for persistent colonization, colonization is often a prerequisite for infection. Clinicians should continuously monitor the status of patients who present with long-term colonization of C. auris and be vigilant against the occurrence of C. auris infection.

Limitations in our study should be discussed. Firstly, only two strains of C. auris with rough morphotype colonies were included in the analysis. Secondly, only a few genes displayed SNPs in the comparative genomic analysis. Thirdly, in order to avoid any deletion of genetic items, we set thresholds (| log2FoldChange| > 1 and adjusted p-value < 0.05) in accordance with other literature (Wu et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2022; Gong et al., 2023). Nonetheless, only a dozen genes were changed in the transcriptomic comparison analysis. From another point of view, we should make good use of this special model and try our best to elucidate the key factors affecting the phenotypic switching of C. auris from the limited set of variation factors so as to better promote the morphological study of C. auris.

In summary, the unexpected rough morphotype C. auris phenotype should be noted since it is suggestive that C. auris had latent phenotypic plasticity and was undergoing adaptive evolution. We should continue to enrich the study of morphological and genetic characteristics of C. auris, so as to help clinicians timely and accurately diagnose diseases caused by C. auris.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University (ERC number 2019-53-2). Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

ST, JB, YC, HL, and QW have made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data. SC and JC have been involved in drafting the manuscript. HS have given final approval of the version to be published. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2300400), the National Key Specialist Construction Project for Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Medicine Innovation Unit (2019RU017), and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1174878/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

  1. ^ https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240060241
  2. ^ http://www.candidagenome.org/
  3. ^ https://itol.embl.de

References

Anders, S., and Huber, W. (2010). Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11:R106.

Google Scholar

Anders, S., Pyl, P. T., and Huber, W. (2015). HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bates, S., Hall, R. A., Cheetham, J., Netea, D. M., MacCallum, D., and Brown, J. (2013). Role of the Candida albicans MNN1 gene family in cell wall structure and virulence. BMC Res. Notes 6:294. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-294

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ben-Ami, R., Berman, J., Novika, A., Bash, E., Shachor-Meyouhas, Y., and Zakin, S. (2017). Multidrug-resistant Candida haemulonii and C. auris, Tel Aviv, Israel. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 23, 195–203. doi: 10.3201/eid2302.161486

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bentz, M. L., Sexton, D. J., Welsh, R. M., and Litvintseva, A. P. (2018). Phenotypic switching in newly emerged multidrug-resistant pathogen Candida auris. Med. Mycol. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myy100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boisrame, A., Cornu, A., Da Costa, G., and Richard, M. L. (2011). Unexpected role for a serine/threonine-rich domain in the Candida albicans Iff protein family. Eukaryot Cell 10, 1317–1330. doi: 10.1128/EC.05044-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borman, A. M., Szekely, A., and Johnson, E. M. (2016). Comparative pathogenicity of United Kingdom isolates of the emerging pathogen Candida auris and other key pathogenic Candida species. mSphere 1, e00189–e00216. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00189-16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bu, D., Luo, H., Huo, P., Wang, Z., Zhang, S., and He, Z. (2021). KOBAS-i: intelligent prioritization and exploratory visualization of biological functions for gene enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W317–W325. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Souza, C. M., Moralez, A., Dos Santos, M., Mantovani, M., Furlaneto-Maia, L., and Furlaneto, M. (2022). Deciphering colonies of phenotypic switching-derived morphotypes of the pathogenic yeast Candida tropicalis. Mycopathologia 187, 509–516. doi: 10.1007/s11046-022-00663-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Enjalbert, B., MacCallum, D. M., Odds, F. C., and Brown, A. J. (2007). Niche-specific activation of the oxidative stress response by the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 75, 2143–2151.

Google Scholar

Ev, L. D., Dame-Teixeira, N., Do, T., Maltz, M., and Parolo, C. C. F. (2020). The role of Candida albicans in root caries biofilms: an RNA-seq analysis. J. Appl. Oral. Sci. 28:e20190578. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0578

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eyre, D. W., Sheppard, A., Madder, H., Moir, I., Moroney, R., Quan, T., et al. (2018). A Candida auris outbreak and its control in an intensive care setting. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 1322–1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1714373

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gong, H., Wang, T., Wu, M., Chu, Q., Lan, H., and Lang, W. (2023). Maternal effects drive intestinal development beginning in the embryonic period on the basis of maternal immune and microbial transfer in chickens. Microbiome 11:41. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01490-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Govender, N. P., Magobo, R., Mpembe, R., Mhlanga, M., Matlapeng, P., and Corcoran, C. (2018). Candida auris in South Africa, 2012-2016. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 24, 2036–2040. doi: 10.3201/eid2411.180368

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heath, C. H., Dyer, J. R., Pang, S., Coombs, G. W., and Gardam, D. J. (2019). Candida auris sternal Osteomyelitis in a Man from Kenya visiting Australia, 2015. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 25, 192–194. doi: 10.3201/eid2501.181321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hellborg, L., Woolfit, M., Arthursson-Hellborg, M., and Piskur, J. (2008). Complex evolution of the DAL5 transporter family. BMC Genomics 9:164. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-164

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heymann, P., Gerads, M., Schaller, M., Dromer, F., Winkelmann, G., and Ernst, J. (2002). The siderophore iron transporter of Candida albicans (Sit1p/Arn1p) mediates uptake of ferrichrome-type siderophores and is required for epithelial invasion. Infect. Immun. 70, 5246–5255. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.9.5246-5255.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jenull, S., Tscherner, M., Kashko, N., Shivarathri, R., Stoiber, A., and Chauhan, M. (2021). Transcriptome signatures predict phenotypic variations of Candida auris. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 11:662563. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.662563

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Juchimiuk, M., Orłowski, J., Gawarecka, K., Świeżewska, E., Ernst, J., and Palamarczyk, G. (2014). Candida albicans cis-prenyltransferase Rer2 is required for protein glycosylation, cell wall integrity and hypha formation. Fungal Genet. Biol. 69, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.05.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, S., Stecher, G., and Tamura, K. (2016). MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis Version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Langmead, B., and Salzberg, S. L. (2012). Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mayer, F. L., Wilson, D., Jacobsen, I., Miramón, P., Slesiona, S., and Bohovych, I. (2012). Small but crucial: the novel small heat shock protein Hsp21 mediates stress adaptation and virulence in Candida albicans. PLoS One 7:e38584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038584

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Naglik, J. R., Challacombe, S. J., and Hube, B. (2003). Candida albicans secreted aspartyl proteinases in virulence and pathogenesis. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67, 400–428.

Google Scholar

Palliyil, S., Mawer, M., Alawfi, S., Fogg, L., Tan, T., and De Cesare, G. (2022). Monoclonal antibodies targeting surface-exposed epitopes of Candida albicans cell wall proteins confer in vivo protection in an infection model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 66:e0195721. doi: 10.1128/aac.01957-21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Plaine, A., Walker, L., Da Costa, G., Mora-Montes, H., McKinnon, A., and Gow, N. (2008). Functional analysis of Candida albicans GPI-anchored proteins: roles in cell wall integrity and caspofungin sensitivity. Fungal Genet. Biol. 45, 1404–1414. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.08.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Radford, D. R., Challacombe, S. J., and Walter, J. D. (1994). A scanning electronmicroscopy investigation of the structure of colonies of different morphologies produced by phenotypic switching of Candida albicans. J. Med. Microbiol. 40, 416–423. doi: 10.1099/00222615-40-6-416

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Santana, D. J., and O’Meara, T. R. (2021). Forward and reverse genetic dissection of morphogenesis identifies filament-competent Candida auris strains. Nat. Commun. 12:7197.

Google Scholar

Siren, J., Valimaki, N., and Makinen, V. (2014). Indexing graphs for path queries with applications in genome research. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 11, 375–388. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2013.2297101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tamura, K., and Nei, M. (1993). Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 512–526. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tian, S., Bing, J., Chu, Y., Chen, J., Cheng, S., and Wang, Q. (2021). Genomic epidemiology of Candida auris in a general hospital in Shenyang, China: a three-year surveillance study. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 10, 1088–1096. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1934557

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tian, S., Rong, C., Nian, H., Li, F., Chu, Y., and Cheng, S. (2018). First cases and risk factors of super yeast Candida auris infection or colonization from Shenyang. China. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 7:128.

Google Scholar

Wagner, A. S., Lumsdaine, S., Mangrum, M., King, A., Hancock, T., and Sparer, T. (2022). Cek1 regulates ss(1,3)-glucan exposure through calcineurin effectors in Candida albicans. PLoS Genet. 18:e1010405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010405

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, K., Li, M., and Hakonarson, H. (2010). ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:e164.

Google Scholar

Wu, L. Y., Shang, G., Wang, F., Gao, J., Wan, M., and Xu, Z. (2022). Dynamic chromatin state profiling reveals regulatory roles of auxin and cytokinin in shoot regeneration. Dev. Cell 57, 526–542 e27. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.12.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yue, H., Bing, J., Zheng, Q., Zhang, Y., Hu, T., and Du, H. (2018). Filamentation in Candida auris, an emerging fungal pathogen of humans: passage through the mammalian body induces a heritable phenotypic switch. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 7:188. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0187-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Q., Zhu, X., Li, Y., Yang, P., Wang, S., and Ning, K. (2022). Intestinal microbiome-mediated resistance against vibriosis for Cynoglossus semilaevis. Microbiome 10:153. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01346-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Candida auris, rough morphotype, RNA-seq, ACE2, PSA31

Citation: Tian S, Bing J, Chu Y, Li H, Wang Q, Cheng S, Chen J and Shang H (2023) Phenotypic and genetic features of a novel clinically isolated rough morphotype Candida auris. Front. Microbiol. 14:1174878. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1174878

Received: 27 February 2023; Accepted: 23 May 2023;
Published: 07 June 2023.

Edited by:

Erica Lasek-Nesselquist, Wadsworth Center, United States

Reviewed by:

Louise Walker, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Renátó Kovács, University of Debrecen, Hungary

Copyright © 2023 Tian, Bing, Chu, Li, Wang, Cheng, Chen and Shang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hong Shang, aG9uZ3NoYW5nMTAwQGhvdG1haWwuY29t

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.