Manikant Tripathi1*†
Pankaj Singh1†
Ranjan Singh2†
Saroj Bala3†
Neelam Pathak4
Sangram Singh4Rajveer Singh Chauhan5
Pradeep Kumar Singh4*- 1Biotechnology Program, Dr. Rammanohar Lohia Avadh University, Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India
- 2Department of Microbiology, Dr. Rammanohar Lohia Avadh University, Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India
- 3Department of Microbiology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
- 4Department of Biochemistry, Dr. Rammanohar Lohia Avadh University, Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India
- 5Department of Botany, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
Toxic wastes like heavy metals and dyes are released into the environment as a direct result of industrialization and technological progress. The biosorption of contaminants utilizes a variety of biomaterials. Biosorbents can adsorb toxic pollutants on their surface through various mechanisms like complexation, precipitation, etc. The quantity of sorption sites that are accessible on the surface of the biosorbent affects its effectiveness. Biosorption’s low cost, high efficiency, lack of nutrient requirements, and ability to regenerate the biosorbent are its main advantages over other treatment methods. Optimization of environmental conditions like temperature, pH, nutrient availability, and other factors is a prerequisite to achieving optimal biosorbent performance. Recent strategies include nanomaterials, genetic engineering, and biofilm-based remediation for various types of pollutants. The removal of hazardous dyes and heavy metals from wastewater using biosorbents is a strategy that is both efficient and sustainable. This review provides a perspective on the existing literature and brings it up-to-date by including the latest research and findings in the field.
1. Introduction
Technological advancements in industry, agriculture, and other anthropogenic activities such as battery production, pesticides, alloy production, phosphate fertilizer, photographic materials, sewage irrigation, tannery and textile wastes, and dyes industries have wreaked havoc on our ecosystem due to the discharge of massive amounts of toxic metals, hazardous waste such as dyes and metalloids, and organic contaminants (Dixit et al., 2015; Ayangbenro and Babalola, 2017; Garg and Tripathi, 2017; Garg and Chopra, 2022; Kinigopoulou et al., 2022; Pham et al., 2022; Saravanan et al., 2023). Naturally available heavy metals are tightly bound to the soil and cannot impact the life of a living being. Contamination of the ecosystem with these non-degraded heavy metals, dyes, and metalloids beyond the recommended limit is creating serious global health concerns and having a detrimental effect on all life forms (Yin et al., 2019; Elgarahy et al., 2021). Due to their non-degradative properties, most heavy metals persist for a long time in the environment, which causes bioaccumulation and toxicity. The toxicity of heavy metals and dyes depends on the concentration exposed to organisms, duration of exposure, absorbed dose, and routes of exposure (Mani and Kumar, 2014). Bioassimilation is the process by which organisms absorb particular nutrients, substances, or molecules from their environment into their own biological tissues. Bacteria and other microbes can bioassimilate (Nikolaivits et al., 2021). It is a crucial process in numerous biological systems, with both positive and negative effects on species and ecosystems (El-Sherif et al., 2022). Understanding the mechanisms and the consequences of bioassimilation is crucial for maintaining and preserving the health of biological systems.
Heavy metal and dye-contaminated sites are cleaned up using traditional wastewater treatment methods like chemical precipitation, ion exchange, adsorption, evaporative recovery, chemical oxidation or reduction reactions, reverse osmosis, electrolytic recovery, and sludge filtration (Tripathi and Singh, 2022). Two major groups of water pollutants, i.e., dyes and heavy metals, are contaminating the water due to the direct discharge of effluent from the pharmaceutical, paper and pulp, textile and dyeing industries, food processing, leather tanning, electroplating, and mining industries (Chowdhary et al., 2020; Munjur et al., 2020). Heavy metals and dyes contaminate the soil and water bodies and affect plant and microbial growth and productivity. So, there is a need to find out some safe technologies by which we can reduce the availability of heavy metals and dyes in the open environment (Singh et al., 2022a). Ancient writings showed that bacteria, cyanobacteria, microbial consortiums, fungi, yeasts, and plants have a lot of potential to get rid of metals and dyes through different processes. The mechanisms present in microorganisms to detoxify heavy metals and dyes can be used to design the bio-treatment in the bioremediation treatment process. Plant-based removal or detoxification of toxic metals and dyes also uses microbe-based strategies for successful decontamination of polluted sites. The bioremediation technique utilizes the inherent biological mechanisms of microorganisms and plants for the removal of heavy metals and dyes from polluted environments (Akcil et al., 2015; Ojuederie and Babalola, 2017; Tripathi and Singh, 2022).
Microbial remediation uses mechanisms of microorganisms such as bioaccumulation, biosorption, and biotransformation for the removal of heavy metals and dyes from polluted environments (Garg and Tripathi, 2017; Filote et al., 2021; Tripathi and Singh, 2022). These methods provide a better alternative and are more effective than physical and chemical techniques to remediate heavy metals. Microbial cells have several protection mechanisms against heavy metal toxicity, like active efflux of metal ions, reduction of metal ions, etc. (Choudhury and Srivastava, 2001; Garg and Chopra, 2022). It is well known that industrial dyes are dangerous, which makes them common contaminants (Garg and Tripathi, 2017; Bala et al., 2022). Dyeing is a common practice in many manufacturing sectors; this includes textiles, paper, plastics, leather, and many more. There are a number of techniques that have been proven to be effective at removing dye (Elgarahy et al., 2021; Tripathi et al., 2021, 2023). The cultivation of several microbial strains for use in biological treatment has been envisioned as a potentially lucrative solution (Yusuf et al., 2021).
Industrial effluent dye and heavy metal removal with microbial biosorbents seem promising. Microbial biosorbents can remediate these pollutants; however, there are still research gaps. Microbial biosorbents require strain selection, growing conditions, and immobilization. Optimizing these parameters increases biosorption efficiency (Nguyen et al., 2022). Microbial biosorbents have been studied mostly in labs. These experiments must be scaled up to assess the viability of utilizing microbial biosorbents in large-scale industrial applications. Industrial uses of microbial biosorbents depend on their long-term stability (Younas et al., 2021). Microbial biosorbent stability and reusability need further study. For a better understanding of microbial biosorbent for the remediation of dyes and heavy metal pollution, a graphical mapping of the keywords co-occurrence and co-authorship was made using the noncommercial visualization of similarities (VOS) viewer VOS viewer 1.6.18.1 The quantity of published work mainly from 2018 to 2023 is a powerful indicator of future paths of study. A keyword list can be used to classify various academic disciplines. Figure 1 shows a network visualization map of the most-cited keywords for the past few years.
Figure 1. Network visualization of most frequently used keywords over time, as well as a clustering of the keywords’ citation networks.
Genetically modified microorganisms will have altered cells with efficient adsorption capacity and specificity for target metals (Wu et al., 2021; Rafeeq et al., 2023). The use of microbial fuel cells (MFC) and biofilm-based treatment can also be applied. Many parameters such as nutritional status, pH, temperature, chemical composition of heavy metals, moisture, and redox potential influence the bioremediation efficiency (Shukla et al., 2013). This review discusses the origin and harmful consequences of toxic metals and dye pollutants, eco-friendly microorganism-based and recent technologies for treating dyes and heavy metal-contaminated surroundings, and future prospects.
2. Sources and hazardous effects
A number of industries release heavy metals like chromium, lead, mercury, and others into the environment. According to Tripathi et al. (2018), heavy metals pose a significant risk to human health. On the other hand, dyes are the aromatic color preparations used in textile, paper, leather, food, cosmetics, tanneries, pharmaceutical industries, etc. (Shindhal et al., 2021; Singh et al., 2021a). In a study, Gita et al. (2017) suggested that synthetic dyes are made from petrochemical compounds and can be sold as powder, paste, liquid, or granules. Fabrics color quickly and evenly, offer a wide range of color shades, stay stable in the face of many outside factors, and use little energy (Hossen et al., 2019). So, most synthetic dyes are toxic when they are dumped into the biosphere without being cleaned or only partially cleaned (Ito et al., 2016; Singh, 2017).
Textile wastewater has a high biological and chemical oxygen demand, a high pH, and it also possesses organic and inorganic pollutants including heavy metals, chlorinated compounds, chromium, pigments, etc. (Donkadokula et al., 2020; Singh et al., 2021a,b). These contaminants have been held accountable for the pollution of local landfills and agricultural fields, which reduces plant growth by causing oxidative stress and lowering photosynthesis and CO2 assimilation rates, especially in developing countries (Vikrant et al., 2018). The damage was also caused by the dark color and high turbidity of the wastewater, which diminished aquatic photosynthesis (Donkadokula et al., 2020). The main contributors to heavy metals are listed below in Table 1.
Table 1. Sources and toxic impacts of heavy metals.
3. Microbial biosorbent: A tool for dyes and heavy metals clean-up
Biosorption is a subfield of sustainable development that focuses on application. It is regarded as an eco-friendly, economical, and effective water treatment method. In accordance with various government regulations, it lowers the concentration of various water contaminants to acceptable levels. This eco-friendly protocol aligns with the concepts of green chemistry. The concept of biosorption as a multifaceted, effective process has evolved in recent years. It is regarded as an admirable alternative to conventional wastewater treatment technology. Sorption is primarily defined as a physico-chemical phenomenon involving the concentration of sorbate molecules on the surface of another substance. Adsorption is a physical interaction between sorbate and sorbent that produces a sorbent-sorbate contact (Nisa et al., 2022). Biosorption is a passive, metabolically independent process covering all sorbate-biological matrix contact features (Fomina and Gadd, 2014). Microbial biosorbents remove xenobiotic compounds from contaminated environments in a cost-effective and environmentally friendly way. Synthetic xenobiotic compounds can harm humans and the environment.
Microbial biosorbents adsorb or absorb xenobiotic compounds from water or soil (Kour et al., 2021). Cell walls, exopolysaccharides, and extracellular proteins from microorganisms like bacteria, fungi, algae, and yeasts make up these materials. Microbial biosorbents remove xenobiotic compounds better than chemical or physical separation methods. Biodegradable, renewable, and inexpensive, microbial biosorbents (Adewuyi, 2020). They can also be customized to specific pollutants and used in situ, saving money on transportation and disposal of contaminated materials. Microbial biosorbents aim to reduce xenobiotic compound contamination while protecting the environment and human health (Bradu et al., 2022). Figure 2 presents some of the various elements that can have an effect on microbial biosorbent. It plays a significant role in numerous naturally occurring processes across various scientific disciplines. Several studies have demonstrated that numerous organisms, including prokaryotes and eukaryotes, have varying natural capacities to biosorb hazardous heavy metal ions as well as toxic dyes (Datta et al., 2020). Anoxybacillus rupiensis TPH1 was identified from the Tattapani hot spring in Chhattisgarh, India. This strain has the potential to be applied to the bioremediation of heavy metals and azo dyes (Mishra et al., 2023).
Figure 2. Factors for effective biosorption of pollutants.
Toxicity activates numerous resistance mechanisms. The creation of metal-binding peptides like metallothioneins, the development of protein transporters of ligand–metal complexes from the cytoplasm to vacuoles, and the efflux of metal ions by cell wall ion channels are some of these methods. Plasmids are often used by bacteria because of their ability to encode tolerance mechanisms (Kumar et al., 2019). A number of studies have been carried out with the intention of enhancing the resistance and/or the capacity of microorganisms to collect heavy metal ions. Bacillus and Pseudomonas sp. were used as potential biosorbents for the effective removal of toxic heavy metals from the environment (Ghosh et al., 2022). Bacillus subtilis was able to biosorb a maximum of 96% of chromium at a concentration of 25 g mL−1, whereas P. aeruginosa was able to biosorb a maximum of 91.0% of metal at a concentration of 400 g Cd mL−1 (Rizvi et al., 2020).
Most dye-containing wastewater is treated biologically through aerobic, anaerobic, or a combination of aerobic and anaerobic biodegradation. This is because it is cheap and does not make any harmful byproducts. A wide range of microorganisms were used to decolorize dye and mineralize it (Kapoor et al., 2021). Garg and Tripathi (2017) reported that different microorganisms could be used to get rid of dyes contamination from polluted sites. They have a tremendous capacity for taking in pollutants, regenerating themselves, and costing very little to run. Both pure and mixed bacterial cultures can use a wide variety of carbon or nitrogen sources (Shabir et al., 2022). There have also been a few reports of possible strategies for the biosorption of color chemicals by bacterial biomass (Ellafi et al., 2023). The ability of bacterial biomass to bind dye particles is facilitated by the presence of hydroxyl, carboxyl, amino, and phosphate groups in the peptidoglycan layer of the cell wall. Due to the fact that biosorption is a metabolically autonomous process, no nutrients are required to support bacterial cell growth. Saccharomyces pastorianus was immobilized using a straightforward entrapment method and then microencapsulated in alginate. The biosorption behavior of this immobilized strain of yeast was examined in relation to an organic pollutant known as cationic dye (Blaga et al., 2022).
4. Mechanism of biosorption
Biosorption mechanistic investigations of various water contaminants are essential for evaluating their control effectiveness. They are advantageous for optimizing the conditions of the removal procedure. There are several mechanisms through which biosorbent materials remediate environmental pollutants (Figure 3A). Biosorption uses microbial cells or biomolecules to remove pollutants from water or wastewater. Biosorption involves adsorption, diffusion, and binding. Microbial cells or biomolecules on the biosorbent attract aqueous phase pollutants during adsorption (Figure 3B). Physical or chemical interactions may bind pollutants to biosorbent functional groups like carboxyl, amino, or hydroxyl groups (Adewuyi, 2020). Adsorbed pollutants may disperse within the biosorbent and find more binding sites. Ion exchange, complexation, chelation, and electrostatic attraction can bind pollutants to biosorbents. The biosorbent’s surface area, surface chemistry, aqueous phase pollutants, pH, and temperature affect biosorption efficiency. Desorption or heat or chemical treatment can renew the biosorbent after biosorption. Biosorbent can be reused (Singh et al., 2022b). Biosorption is a potential method for removing toxic heavy metals and dyes from aquatic environment.
Figure 3. (A) Different ways to remediate environmental pollutants through biosorption process. (B) The biosorption mechanism of dyes and metals pollutants. B is reprinted from Blaga et al. (2021) and is an open-access article (Copyright © 2021 by authors) distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
5. Recent strategies for pollutants remediation
Plants or microbes are used in bioremediation to treat polluted environments with xenobiotics and harmful heavy metals by converting them into nontoxic compounds (Bala et al., 2022; Tripathi and Singh, 2022). Improved bioremediation results can be achieved by a number of different methods, the choice of which is based on the level of pollution present in the immediate area. Bioremediation can be applied in-situ or ex-situ, whereas the in-situ bioremediation methods are more cost-effective and cause less pollution to be released into the environment (Rafeeq et al., 2023). Bioremediation using bacteria, fungi, yeasts, and algae is being studied. These microbes acted as toxic pollutant biosorbents (Kour et al., 2021). Biological methods (using bacteria, algae, fungi, and plants) have also been used successfully to treat dye-containing wastewater, but they are inefficient and risky (Singh et al., 2021b). In view of this, some other recent strategies are required for the remediation of textile dyes that are low cost and highly efficient.
5.1. Nanoparticle based
The use of nanoparticles (NPs) to clean up textile dyes is very promising right now, since NPs are better at cleaning up dyes and are better for the environment than other methods with applications in various fields. They are nanoscale materials and have huge potential for removing textile dyes (Chen et al., 2009). NPs are the tiniest structural arrangements with precision, intelligibility, and cost-effectiveness (Singh et al., 2019). Nanoparticles for bioremediation of hazardous textile dyes can be prepared by a variety of methods (Chandhru et al., 2020). The structure, shape, size, pH, dye concentration, and purity of nanomaterials play an important role in the process of decolorization of wastewater (Muthukumaran et al., 2016). They are mostly applied directly to wastewater for the adsorption of dyes on their surface (Fabryanty et al., 2017). They might also be used in membranes, filters, and carbon nanotubes for bioremediation of discharged textile wastewater (Kumari et al., 2017). Several reports were available that demonstrate dye degradation using nanocomposites such as polyaniline/SiO (Tanzifi et al., 2018), graphene oxide/zinc oxide (GO/ZnO; Durmus et al., 2019), and RGO-Ni (Das et al., 2019). In an investigation, Umar et al. (2021) used Pd-Ni bimetallic nanoparticles for the successful removal of the dye Acid Orange 8. In some studies, NPs were utilized for the removal of heavy metals, microbes, and oil from wastewater (Bayazit et al., 2019; Kausar et al., 2022). A variety of nanomaterials, including TiO, ZnO, and metallic nanoparticles such as gold, silver, and iron, have been tested for the catalytic degradation of toxic dyes (Singh et al., 2019).
Cds/GO nanoparticles are a nanomaterial composed of cadmium sulfide (Cds) and graphene oxide. They are suitable for use in bioremediation due to their unique properties. GO is a highly oxidized form of graphene that has the ability to adsorb a wide variety of organic and inorganic compounds. Cds/GO nanoparticles can interact with xenobiotics in multiple ways when added to contaminated soil or water. First, Cds can absorb light and produce ROS, which are capable of degrading xenobiotics. Second, GO is capable of adsorbing xenobiotics and reducing their concentration in the environment (Gul and Ahmad, 2022). Cds/GO nanoparticles have been utilized to remove dyes from wastewater, degrade polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil, and remove pesticides from water (Safapour et al., 2022).
5.2. Through biofilms
A biofilm is an assemblage of microbes that normally originates in wet environments. Biofilm is produced from organic and inorganic substances that are generated from decaying material in wastewater. Biofilm-mediated degradation involves the enzymatic decomposition of various organic compounds and biosorption, during which elements convert from the liquid phase to the solid phase. Bacterial biofilms can remove dyes and achieve decolorization by using biosorption and degradation mechanisms (Watnick and Kolter, 2000). Bacteria, fungi, algae, and protozoa are also the organisms that form biofilms by generating an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). EPS holds the microbial cells in biofilms together as they accumulate into three-dimensional assemblages that secrete glue-like material for attachment to any hard surface (Singh et al., 2019). Comparing fungal–bacterial biofilms to their individual cultures, Nigrosin disodium and Malachite Green dyes are more effectively degraded. In this experiment, Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Bacillus subtilis produced a biofilm that had the highest dye removal ability for both Nigrosin disodium and Malachite Green dyes (Henagamage, 2019). Biofilm consortiums were also useful in the color removal, degradation, and detoxification of the azo dye Methyl Orange (Haque et al., 2021). Congo Red was removed by Bacillus sp. MH587030.1-derived polyurethane/polypropylene biofilm in a moving bed reactor (Sonwani et al., 2020). Biofilm-mediated textile wastewater treatment offers numerous advantages, like operational flexibility, low space requirements, a high biomass residence time, enhanced bioremediation of recalcitrant compounds, and the production of a small amount of sludge (Singh et al., 2019).
5.3. Genetic engineering: A bioremediation tool
Recently, genetic engineering has been shown to be an important tool for making dye removal bioremediation processes that are more effective and better for the environment. This has made a big change in this field. This process can be useful for the absolute bioremediation of pollutants, including textile dyes (Singh et al., 2019). It involves identification, isolation, cloning, and transferring genes that encode degradative enzymes. These enzymes enhance the bioremediation potential of native microbes. These engineered degraders, called super degrading microorganisms (Pereira and Alves, 2011), exist as engineered or hybrid strains (Kandelbauer and Guebitz, 2005).
Every microorganism has different potential for bioremediation of textile dyes. Genetically modified microorganisms (GMMs) can be produced by transferring genes from one species to another or by gene modification (Saxena et al., 2019; Kumar et al., 2020). The bacterium Escherichia coli that was engineered with the azoreductase enzyme gene of Pseudomonas luteola effectively degrades textile dyes (Chang et al., 2000). Similarly, Dixit and Garg (2018) transferred the azoreductase enzyme-coding gene azoK into E. coli from the bacterium Klebsiella pneumonia to achieve successful decolorization of the dye Methyl Orange. Ajaz et al. (2020) demonstrated the removal of Remazol Red dye with the help of the azoreductase gene. Although some ecological safety issues exist with GMMs, they can be overcome by utilizing the products, enzymes, or intact cells containing overexpressed enzymes (Singh et al., 2019).
6. Challenges, research gaps, future directions, and applications
For biosorbents to attain their full potential, additional research is required in a variety of fields. Sonication, freeze-drying, and the addition of new functional groups are just a few of the strategies that have been used to increase the sorption activity of biosorbents (Anderson et al., 2022). Extending the biosorption capacity of various biosorbents to remove heavy metals and dyes from aquatic environments should be a primary focus of future research. Very little work has been done to assess the risks to the environment and human health associated with using biosorbents for such pollution remediation (Elgarahy et al., 2021). Moreover, xenobiotics and pharmaceuticals are becoming new environmental concerns. They can enter the environment through air, water, or soil contamination and last long. They can survive in the environment and accumulate in the food chain. These contaminants pose health and environmental risks (Singh and Singh, 2020). Xenobiotics and pharmaceuticals can cause reproductive and developmental issues, hormonal imbalances, and cancer in humans and animals. Biosurfactants have the potential to be used in future directions due to their capacity to decrease surface tension and increase the solubility and bioavailability of hydrophobic substances (Parthipan et al., 2021). Biosurfactants improve microbial bioremediation of dyes and heavy metals. Textile, printing, and dyeing industries use synthetic organic dyes. Persistent, toxic, and polluting, Biosurfactants increase dye solubility and microbial degradation, accelerating pollutant removal. Biosurfactants improve dye-contaminated wastewater dispersion and flocculation and sedimentation. Heavy metals in the environment can cause health issues. Biosurfactants make heavy metals more soluble and mobilizable for microbial biodegradation (Shukla et al., 2019). Biosurfactants help form metal-mineral complexes that immobilize heavy metals and reduce their bioavailability. Biosurfactants increase dye and heavy metal solubility and bioavailability, improving microbial bioremediation. Sustainable and environmentally friendly dye and heavy metal remediation using biosurfactants is promising (Deb et al., 2020).
Most of the time, biosorption has been shown to be better at absorbing things than bioaccumulation. To increase microorganisms’ tolerance for the accumulation of heavy metals, scientists have developed microbial genetic engineering. To further enhance the physical and chemical stability, immobilization of bacterial biomass on a suitable carrier may also be addressed (Singh et al., 2022b; Tripathi and Singh, 2022). While the benefits of biosorption with immobilized bacterial biomass seem promising, there are limitations to this approach because the underlying mechanism of the process is not fully known. In addition to biotechnology and nanotechnology, there are a number of other methods that, when combined, could give cutting-edge bioengineering technologies.
Biosorption of heavy metals and bioremediation of dyes have demonstrated promising future applications in a variety of fields. Industrial wastewater containing a high concentration of heavy metals and dyes can be treated using biosorption technology (Chu and Phang, 2019). This technology can be used to eliminate these contaminants from wastewater prior to its release into the environment. Biosorption technology can be employed to remove heavy metals from soil, thereby enhancing soil quality and crop yield. This technology can also be used to treat heavy metal- and dye-contaminated agricultural wastewater (Singh et al., 2020). Using biosorption technology, contaminated soils and groundwater can be remedied. This technology can be used to remove heavy metals and dyes from polluted soil, thereby contributing to the restoration of the natural environment. Biosorption technology has the potential to become a sustainable and cost-effective method for removing dyes from a variety of sources (Danouche et al., 2021).
7. Conclusion
This review paper explores biosorbent technologies for remediating heavy metal and dye-contaminated waterbodies. Use of biosorbent technologies provides attractive features like being readily available, potentially efficient, and inexpensive. In the biosorption process, microbial cells utilize adsorption phenomena, which include ionic, chemical, and physical ones. A large number of functional groups on the surface of microbial cells attract metals and dye metabolites. It has been observed that the biosorbent technologies can remove heavy metals from polluted aqueous solutions and have high adsorption capacities for synthetic dyes. For the sustainable development of effective biosorption technologies, there is a need to explore biosorbent characterization, efficient mechanisms of heavy metal removal, operating conditions, and microbial growth.
Author contributions
MT: conceptualization, writing-original draft, and reviewing, editing, and finalizing the manuscript. PS, RS, and SB: writing—original draft, reviewing and editing, and drawing figures and table. NP, SS, and RC: reviewing and editing. PKS: writing-original draft and reviewing, editing, and finalizing the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Biotechnology Program, Dr. Rammanohar Lohia Avadh University, Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India, for providing the research environment.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
References
Abbas, S. Z., Rafatullah, M., Hossain, K., Ismail, N., Tajarudin, H. A., and Abdul Khalil, H. P. S. (2018). A review on mechanism and future perspectives of cadmium-resistant bacteria. Int J Environ Sci Technol 15, 243–262. doi: 10.1007/s13762-017-1400-5
Abbas, S. Z., Riaz, M., Ramzan, N., Zahid, M. T., Shakoori, F. R., and Rafatullah, M. (2014). Isolation and characterization of arsenic resistant bacteria from wastewater. Braz. J. Microbiol. 45, 1309–1315. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822014000400022
Adewuyi, A. (2020). Chemically modified biosorbents and their role in the removal of emerging pharmaceutical waste in the water system. Water 12:1551. doi: 10.3390/w12061551
Ajaz, M., Shakeel, S., and Rehman, A. (2020). Microbial use for azo dye degradation-a strategy for dye bioremediation. Int. Microbiol. 23, 149–159. doi: 10.1007/s10123-019-00103-2
Akcil, A., Erust, C., Ozdemiroglu, S., Fonti, V., and Beolchini, F. (2015). A review of approaches and techniques used in aquatic contaminated sediments: metal removal and stabilization by chemical and biotechnological processes. J. Clean. Prod. 86, 24–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.009
Anderson, A., Anbarasu, A., Pasupuleti, R. R., Sekar, M., Praveenkumar, T. R., and Kumar, J. A. (2022). Treatment of heavy metals containing wastewater using biodegradable adsorbents: A review of mechanism and future trends. Chemosphere 295:133724. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133724
Ayangbenro, A. S., and Babalola, O. O. (2017). A new strategy for heavy metal polluted environments: a review of microbial biosorbents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14:94. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14010094
Bala, S., Garg, D., Thirumalesh, B. V., Sharma, M., Sridhar, K., Inbaraj, B. S., et al. (2022). Recent strategies for bioremediation of emerging pollutants: a review for a green and sustainable environment. Toxics. 10:484. doi: 10.3390/toxics10080484
Balaram, V., Rani, A., and Rathore, D. P. S. (2022). Uranium in groundwater in parts of India and world: A comprehensive review of sources, impact to the environment and human health, analytical techniques, and mitigation technologies. Geosyst. Geoenviron 1:100043. doi: 10.1016/j.geogeo.2022.100043
Bayazit, G., Gul, U. D., and Unal, D. (2019). Biosorption of acid red P-2BX by lichens as low cost biosorbents. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 76, 608–615. doi: 10.1080/00207233.2018.1502959
Bharti, R., and Sharma, R. (2022). Effect of heavy metals: An overview. Materials Today: Proceedings. 51, 880–885. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.278
Blaga, A. C., Tanasa, A. M., Cimpoesu, R., Tataru-Farmus, R. E., and Suteu, D. (2022). Biosorbents based on biopolymers from natural sources and food waste to retain the methylene blue dye from the aqueous medium. Polymers 14:2728. doi: 10.3390/polym14132728
Blaga, A. C., Zaharia, C., and Suteu, D. (2021). Polysaccharides as support for microbial biomass-based adsorbents with applications in removal of heavy metals and dyes. Polymers 13:2893. doi: 10.3390/polym13172893
Bradu, P., Biswas, A., Nair, C., Sreevalsakumar, S., Patil, M., Kannampuzha, S., et al. (2022). Recent advances in green technology and industrial revolution 4.0 for a sustainable future. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 1–32. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20024-4
Cao, J., Xie, C., and Hou, Z. (2022). Ecological evaluation of heavy metal pollution in the soil of Pb-Zn mines. Ecotoxicology 31, 259–270. doi: 10.1007/s10646-021-02505-3
Chandhru, M., Rani, S. K., and Vasimalai, N. (2020). Reductive degradation of toxic six dyes in industrial wastewater using diaminobenzoic acid capped silver nanoparticles. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8:104225. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104225
Chang, J. S., Kuo, T. S., Chao, Y. P., Ho, J. Y., and Lin, P. J. (2000). Azo dye decolorization with a mutant Escherichia coli strain. Biotechnol. Lett. 22, 807–812. doi: 10.1023/A:1005624707777
Chen, C. Y., Kuo, J. T., Cheng, C. Y., Huang, Y. T., Ho, I. H., and Chung, Y. C. (2009). Biological decolorization of dye solution containing malachite green by Pandoraea pulmonicola yc32 using a batch and continuous system. J. Hazard. Mater. 172, 1439–1445. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.009
Choudhury, R., and Srivastava, S. (2001). Zinc resistance mechanisms in bacteria. Curr. Sci. 81, 768–775.
Chowdhary, P., Bharagava, R. N., Mishra, S., and Khan, N. (2020). “Role of industries in water scarcity and its adverse effects on environment and human health,” in environmental concerns and sustainable development eds. V. Shukla and N. Kumar (Berlin, Germany: Springer), 235–256. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-5889-0_12
Chu, W. L., and Phang, S. M. (2019). “Biosorption of heavy metals and dyes from industrial effluents by microalgae,” in Microalgae Biotechnology for development of biofuel and wastewater treatment, eds. M. Alam and Z. Wang 599–634. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-2264-8_23
Danouche, M., El Arroussi, H., Bahafid, W., and El Ghachtouli, N. (2021). An overview of the biosorption mechanism for the bioremediation of synthetic dyes using yeast cells. Env. Technol. Rev. 10, 58–76. doi: 10.1080/21622515.2020.1869839
Das, P., Ghosh, S., and Sen, M. B. (2019). Heterogeneous catalytic reduction of 4-nitroaniline by RGO-Ni nanocomposite for water resource management. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 30, 19731–19737. doi: 10.1007/s10854-019-02323-8
Datta, S., Sengupta, D., and Saha, I. (2020). “Bacterial metabolites for removal of toxic dyes and heavy metals,” in Methods for Bioremediation of Water and Wastewater Pollution. Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World, eds. Inamuddin, M. I. Ahamed, E. Lichtfouse, and E. Asiri vol 51, 85–116. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-48985-4_4
Deb, V. K., Rabbani, A., Upadhyay, S., Bharti, P., Sharma, H., Rawat, D. S., et al. (2020). Microbe-assisted phytoremediation in reinstating heavy metal-contaminated sites: concepts, mechanisms, challenges, and future perspectives. Microbial Technology for Health and Environment. Microorganisms for Sustainability, ed. P. Arora, (Singapore: Springer) 22, 161–189. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-2679-4_6
Dixit, S., and Garg, S. (2018). Biodegradation of environmentally hazardous azo dyes and aromatic amines using Klebsiella pneumonia. J. Environ. Eng. 144:7870.0001353. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001353
Dixit, R., Malaviya, D., Pandiyan, K., Singh, U. B., Sahu, A., Shukla, R., et al. (2015). Bioremediation of heavy metals from soil and aquatic environment: an overview of principles and criteria of fundamental processes. Sustainability 7, 2189–2212. doi: 10.3390/su7022189
Donkadokula, N. Y., Kola, A. K., Naz, I., and Saroj, D. (2020). A review on advanced physico-chemical and biological textile dye wastewater treatment techniques. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 19, 543–560. doi: 10.1007/s11157-020-09543-z
Durmus, Z., Kurt, B. Z., and Durmus, A. (2019). Synthesis and characterization of graphene oxide/zinc oxide (GO/ZNO) nanocomposite and its utilization for photocatalytic degradation of basic Fuchsin dye. Chemistry Select. 4, 271–278. doi: 10.1002/slct.201803635
Elgarahy, A. M., Elwakeel, K. Z., Mohammad, S. H., and Elshoubaky, G. A. (2021). A critical review of biosorption of dyes, heavy metals and metalloids from wastewater as an efficient and green process. Cleaner Engineer Technol 4:100209. doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100209
Ellafi, A., Dali, A., Mnif, S., and Ben Younes, S. (2023). Microbial enzymatic degradation, spectral analysis and phytotoxicity assessment of Congo red removal by Bacillus spp. Catal. Lett., 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10562-023-04272-8
El-Sherif, D. M., Eloffy, M. G., Elmesery, A., Abouzid, M., Gad, M., El-Seedi, H. R., et al. (2022). Environmental risk, toxicity, and biodegradation of polyethylene: a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29, 81166–81182. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23382-1
Fabryanty, R., Valencia, C., Soetaredjo, F. E., Putro, J. N., Santoso, S. P., Kurniawan, A., et al. (2017). Removal of crystal violet dye by adsorption using bentonite–alginate composite. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 5, 5677–5687. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.10.057
Filote, C., Rosca, M., Hlihor, R. M., Cozma, P., Simion, I. M., Apostol, M., et al. (2021). Sustainable application of biosorption and bioaccumulation of persistent pollutants in wastewater treatment: current practice. Processes 9:1696. doi: 10.3390/pr9101696
Fomina, M., and Gadd, G. M. (2014). Biosorption: current perspectives on concept, definition and application. Bioresour. Technol. 160, 3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.102
Garg, A., and Chopra, L. (2022). Dye waste: A significant environmental hazard. Mater. Today: Proc. 48, 1310–1315. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.003
Garg, S. K., and Tripathi, M. (2017). Microbial strategies for discoloration and detoxification of azo dyes from textile effluents. Res. J. Microbiol. 12, 1–19.
Genchi, G., Sinicropi, M. S., Lauria, G., Carocci, A., and Catalano, A. (2020). The effects of cadmium toxicity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:3782. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113782
Ghosh, S., Bhattacharya, J., Nitnavare, R., and Webster, T. J. (2022). “Heavy metal removal by Bacillus for sustainable agriculture” in Bacilli in Agrobiotechnology: Plant stress tolerance, bioremediation, and bioprospecting eds. M. T. Islam, M. Rahman, and P. Pandey (Switzerland: Springer International Publishing), 1–30.
Gita, S., Hussan, A., and Choudhury, T. G. (2017). Impact of textile dyes waste on aquatic environments and its treatment. Environ. Ecol. 35, 2349–2353.
Gul, M. M., and Ahmad, K. S. (2022). Review elucidating graphene derivatives (GO/rGO) supported metal sulfides based hybrid nanocomposites for efficient photocatalytic dye degradation. Rev. Inorg. Chem. 42, 337–354. doi: 10.1515/revic-2021-0039
Haque, M. M., Haque, M. A., Mosharaf, M. K., and Marcus, P. K. (2021). Decolorization, degradation and detoxification of carcinogenic sulfonated azo dye methyl orange by newly developed biofilm consortia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 28, 793–804. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.11.012
Henagamage, A. P. (2019). Bioremediation of textile dyes by fungal bacterial biofilms. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotechnol. 4, 635–642. doi: 10.22161/ijeab/4.3.7
Hossen, M. Z., Hussain, M. E., Hakim, A., Islam, K., Uddin, M. N., and Azad, A. K. (2019). Biodegradation of reactive textile dye Novacron super black G by free cells of newly isolated Alcaligenes Faecalis AZ26 and bacillus Spp obtained from textile effluents. Heliyon 5:e02068. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02068
Ito, T., Adachi, Y., Yamanashi, Y., and Shimada, Y. (2016). Long–term natural remediation process in textile dye–polluted river sediment driven by bacterial community changes. Water Res. 100, 458–465. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.050
Kandelbauer, A., and Guebitz, G. M. (2005). “Bioremediation for the decolorization of textile dyes—a review,” in Environmental chemistry. eds. E. Lichtfouse, J. Schwarzbauer, and D. Robert (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer), 269–288.
Kapoor, R. T., Danish, M., Singh, R. S., and Rafatullah, M. (2021). Exploiting microbial biomass in treating azo dyes contaminated wastewater: mechanism of degradation and factors affecting microbial efficiency. J. Water Process Eng. 43:102255. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102255
Kausar, F., Bagheri, A. R., Rasheed, T., Bilal, M., Rizwan, K., Nguyen, T. A., et al. (2022). “Chapter 7-nanomaterials for removal of heavy metals from wastewater,” in Micro and Nano Technologies, Nano-biosorbents for decontamination of water, air, and soil pollution. eds. A. Denizli, N. Ali, M. Bilal, A. Khan, and T. A. Nguyen (Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier), 135–161.
Kinigopoulou, V., Pashalidis, I., Kalderis, D., and Anastopoulos, I. (2022). Microplastics as carriers of inorganic and organic contaminants in the environment: A review of recent progress. J. Mol. Liq. 350:118580. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.118580
Kour, D., Kaur, T., Devi, R., Yadav, A., Singh, M., Joshi, D., et al. (2021). Beneficial microbiomes for bioremediation of diverse contaminated environments for environmental sustainability: present status and future challenges. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 24917–24939. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13252-7
Kumar, A., Kumar, V., and Singh, J. (2019). “Role of fungi in the removal of heavy metals and dyes from wastewater by biosorption processes,” in Recent Advancement in White Biotechnology Through Fungi, eds. A. Yadav, S. Singh, S. Mishra, and A. Gupta 397–418. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-25506-0_16
Kumar, A., Kumar, A., Singh, R., Singh, R., Pandey, S., Rai, A., et al. (2020). “Chapter 16—genetically engineered bacteria for the degradation of dye and other organic compounds,” in Abatement of environmental pollutants. eds. P. Singh, A. Kumar, and A. Borthakur (Elsevier), 331–350.
Kumari, H. J., Krishnamoorthy, P., Arumugam, T. K., Radhakrishnan, S., and Vasudevan, D. (2017). An efficient removal of crystal violet dye from waste water by adsorption onto TLAC/chitosan composite: a novel low cost adsorbent. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 96, 324–333. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.077
Mani, D., and Kumar, C. (2014). Biotechnological advances in bioremediation of heavy metals contaminated ecosystems: an overview with special reference to phytoremediation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 11, 843–872. doi: 10.1007/s13762-013-0299-8
Mishra, A., Kesarwani, S., Jaiswal, T. P., Bhattacharjee, S., Chakraborty, S., Mishra, A. K., et al. (2023). Decoding whole genome of Anoxybacillus rupiensis TPH1 isolated from Tatapani hot spring, India and giving insight into bioremediation ability of TPH1 via heavy metals and azo dyes. Res. Microbiol. 104027:104027. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2023.104027
Munir, N., Jahangeer, M., Bouyahya, A., El Omari, N., Ghchime, R., Balahbib, A., et al. (2022). Heavy metal contamination of natural foods is a serious health issue: A review. Sustainability. 14:161.
Munjur, H., Hasan, M. N., Awual, M. R., Islam, M. M., Shenashen, M. A., and Iqbal, J. (2020). Biodegradable natural carbohydrate polymeric sustainable adsorbents for efficient toxic dye removal from wastewater. J. Mol. Liq. 319:114356. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114356
Muthukumaran, C., Sivakumar, V. M., and Thirumarimurugan, M. (2016). Adsorption isotherms and kinetic studies of crystal violet dye removal from aqueous solution using surfactant modified magnetic nanoadsorbent. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 63, 354–362. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2016.03.034
Nag, R., and Cummins, E. (2022). Human health risk assessment of lead (Pb) through the environmental-food pathway. Sci. Total Environ. 810:151168. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151168
Nguyen, D. T. C., Tran, T. V., Kumar, P. S., Din, A. T. M., Jalil, A. A., and Vo, D. V. N. (2022). Invasive plants as biosorbents for environmental remediation: a review. Env. Chem. Lett. 20, 1421–1451. doi: 10.1007/s10311-021-01377-7
Nikolaivits, E., Pantelic, B., Azeem, M., Taxeidis, G., Babu, R., Topakas, E., et al. (2021). Progressing plastics circularity: A review of mechano-biocatalytic approaches for waste plastic (re) valorization. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9:696040. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.696040
Nisa, R. U., Maqbool, S., and Nisa, A. U. (2022). “Bioremediation on the crossroads of technology for environmental clean-up: an overview,” in Microbial and biotechnological interventions in bioremediation and phytoremediation. ed. J. A. Malik (Cham: Springer)
Ojuederie, O. B., and Babalola, O. O. (2017). Microbial and plant-assisted bioremediation of heavy metal polluted environments: a review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14:1504. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121504
Parthipan, P., Cheng, L., Rajasekar, A., and Angaiah, S. (2021). “Microbial surfactants are next-generation biomolecules for sustainable remediation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons,” in Biosurfactants for a Sustainable Future: Production and Applications in the Environment and Biomedicine, eds. H. Sarma and M. N. V. Prasad 139–158.
Pereira, L., and Alves, M. (2011). “Dyes: environmental impact and remediation A,” in Environmental protection strategies for sustainable development. ed. E. G. Malik (Heidelberg: Springer), 111–162.
Pham, V. H. T., Kim, J., Chang, S., and Chung, W. (2022). Bacterial biosorbents, an efficient heavy metals green clean-up strategy: prospects, challenges, and opportunities. Microorganisms. 10:610. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10030610
Rafeeq, H., Afsheen, N., Rafique, S., Arshad, A., Intisar, M., Hussain, A., et al. (2023). Genetically engineered microorganisms for environmental remediation. Chemosphere 310:136751. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136751
Rizvi, A., Ahmed, B., Zaidi, A., and Khan, M. S. (2020). Biosorption of heavy metals by dry biomass of metal tolerant bacterial biosorbents: an efficient metal clean-up strategy. Environ. Monit. Assess. 192, 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08758-5
Safapour, S., Mazhar, M., Nikanfard, M., and Liaghat, F. (2022). Recent advancements on the functionalized cyclodextrin-based adsorbents for dye removal from aqueous solutions. Int. J. Env. Sci. Technol. 19, 5753–5790. doi: 10.1007/s13762-021-03671-x
Saravanan, A., Kumar, P. S., Duc, P. A., and Rangasamy, G. (2023). Strategies for microbial bioremediation of environmental pollutants from industrial wastewater: A sustainable approach. Chemosphere 313:137323. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137323
Saxena, G., Kishor, R., Saratale, G. D., and Bharagava, R. N. (2019). “Genetically modified organisms (gmos) and their potential in environmental management: constraints, prospects, and challenges. Bioremediation of industrial waste for environmental safety,” in Bioremediation of industrial waste for environmental safety. eds. R. Bharagava and G. Saxena (Singapore: Springer), 1–19.
Shabir, M., Yasin, M., Hussain, M., Shafiq, I., Akhter, P., Nizami, A. S., et al. (2022). A review on recent advances in the treatment of dye-polluted wastewater. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 112, 1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2022.05.013
Sharma, B. M., Sáňka, O., Kalina, J., and Scheringer, M. (2019). An overview of worldwide and regional time trends in total mercury levels in human blood and breast milk from 1966 to 2015 and their associations with health effects. Environ. Int. 125, 300–319. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.12.016
Sharma, P., Singh, S. P., Parakh, S. K., and Tong, Y. W. (2022). Health hazards of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) and its microbial reduction. Bioengineered. 13, 4923–4938. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2037273
Shindhal, T., Rakholiya, P., Varjani, S., Pandey, A., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W., et al. (2021). A critical review on advances in the practices and perspectives for the treatment of dye industry wastewater. Bioengineered. 12, 70–87. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2020.1863034
Shukla, P. K., Misra, P., Maurice, N., and Ramteke, P. W. (2019). Heavy metal toxicity and possible functional aspects of microbial diversity in heavy metal-contaminated sites. Microb Genomics Sustain Agroecosyst 2, 255–317. doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9860-6_15
Shukla, K. P., Sharma, S., Singh, N. K., Singh, V., Bisht, S., and Kumar, V. (2013) Rhizoremediation: A promising rhizosphere technology in Applied Bioremediation - Active and Passive Approaches. eds. Y. B. Patil and P. Rao. (London, UK: Intech Open) doi: 10.5772/56905
Singh, L. (2017). Biodegradation of synthetic dyes: a mycoremediation approach for degradation/decolourization of textile dyes and effluents. J. Appl. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 3, 430–435. doi: 10.15406/jabb.2017.03.00081
Singh, S., Kumar, V., Datta, S., Dhanjal, D. S., Sharma, K., Samuel, J., et al. (2020). Current advancement and future prospect of biosorbents for bioremediation. Sci. Total Environ. 709:135895. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135895
Singh, A., Pal, D. B., Mohammad, A., Alhazmi, A., Haque, S., Yoon, T., et al. (2022a). Biological remediation technologies for dyes and heavy metals in wastewater treatment: new insight. Bioresour. Technol. 343:126154. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126154
Singh, S., Ramamurthy, P. C., Kumar, V., Kapoor, D., Dhaka, V., and Singh, J. (2022b). “Microbes and Agri-food waste as novel sources of biosorbents” in Biotechnology for Zero Waste: Emerging Waste, eds. C.M. Hussain and R. K. Kadeppagari 171–188. doi: 10.1002/9783527832064.ch12
Singh, S. P., and Singh, M. K. (2020). Soil pollution and human health. Plant Responses Soil Pollut, eds. P. Singh, S. K. Singh, and S. M. Prasad 205–220. Singapore: Springer doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-4964-9_13
Singh, R. L., Singh, P. K., and Singh, R. P. (2019). Recent advances in decolorization and degradation of dyes in textile effluent by biological approaches. 1st Edn Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Singh, P. K., Singh, P., Singh, R. P., and Singh, R. L. (2021a). Biodecolorization of azo dye acid blue 113 by soil bacterium Klebsiella variicola RMLP1. J. Ecophysiol. Occup. Health. 21, 64–71. doi: 10.18311/jeoh/0/27108
Singh, P. K., Singh, R. P., Singh, P., and Singh, R. L. (2021b). Efficient decolorization of dye acid blue 113 by soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis RMLP2. Toxicol. Int. 28, 269–280. doi: 10.18311/ti/2021/v28i3/27736
Sonwani, R. K., Swain, G., Giri, B. S., Singh, R. S., and Rai, B. N. (2020). Biodegradation of Congo red dye in a moving bed biofilm reactor: performance evaluation and kinetic modeling. Bioresour. Technol. 302:122811. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122811
Tanzifi, M., Yaraki, M. T., Kiadehi, A. D., Hosseini, S. H., Olazar, M., Bharti, A. K., et al. (2018). Adsorption of Amido black 10B from aqueous solution using polyaniline/SIO nanocomposite: experimental investigation and artificial neural network modeling. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 510, 246–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.09.055
Tripathi, M., and Singh, D. N. (2022) Bioremediation: Advancements and challenges, Bentham Science Publisher, Singapore. doi: 10.2174/97898150360391220101
Tripathi, M., Kumar, S., Singh, D. N., Pandey, R., Pathak, N., and Fatima, H. (2021). “Bioremediation of dye contaminated soil,” in Soil Bioremediation: An Approach Towards Sustainable Technology. eds. J. A. Parray, A. Hashem, and A. E. Mahmoud (United States: John Wiley & Sons) pp. 115–142. doi: 10.1002/97811154976.ch6
Tripathi, M., Pathak, N., Chaudhary, V. K., Singh, P., Singh, P. K., Thirumalesh, B. V., et al. (2023). Microbial decolorization of crystal violet dye by a native multi-metal tolerant Aeromonas caviae MT-1 isolate from dye-contaminated soil: Optimization and phytotoxicity study. Toxicol. Int. 30, 83–93. doi: 10.18311/ti/2023/v30i1/31254
Tripathi, M., Upadhyay, S., Kaur, M., and Kaur, K. (2018). Toxicity concerns of hexavalent chromium from tannery waste. J. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2:40–44.
Umar, A., Khan, M. S., Alam, S., Zekker, I., Burlakovs, J., Bhowmick, G. D., et al. (2021). Synthesis and characterization of Pd-Ni bimetallic nanoparticles as efficient adsorbent for the removal of acid Orange 8 present in wastewater. Water 13:1095. doi: 10.3390/w13081095
Vikrant, K., Giri, B. S., Raza, N., Roy, K., Kim, K. H., Rai, B. N., et al. (2018). Recent advancements in bioremediation of dye: current status and challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 253, 355–367. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.029
Watnick, P., and Kolter, R. (2000). Biofilm, city of microbes. J. Bacteriol. 182, 2675–2679. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.10.2675-2679.2000
Wu, C., Li, F., Yi, S., and Ge, F. (2021). Genetically engineered microbial remediation of soils co-contaminated by heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: advances and ecological risk assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 296:113185. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113185
Yin, K., Wang, Q., Lv, M., and Chen, L. (2019). Microorganism remediation strategies towards heavy metals. Chem. Eng. J. 360:1553–1563. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.226
Younas, F., Mustafa, A., Farooqi, Z. U. R., Wang, X., Younas, S., Mohy-Ud-Din, W., et al. (2021). Current and emerging adsorbent technologies for wastewater treatment: trends, limitations, and environmental implications. Water 13:215. doi: 10.3390/w13020215
Keywords: biosorbent, dyes, genetic engineering, heavy metals, pollution, toxicity
Citation: Tripathi M, Singh P, Singh R, Bala S, Pathak N, Singh S, Chauhan RS and Singh PK (2023) Microbial biosorbent for remediation of dyes and heavy metals pollution: A green strategy for sustainable environment. Front. Microbiol. 14:1168954. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1168954
Edited by:
Joginder Singh, Lovely Professional University, IndiaReviewed by:
Nazim Forid Islam, N.N. Saikia College, IndiaSyed Zaghum Abbas, Jiangsu University, China
Riti Thapar Kapoor, Amity University, India
Copyright © 2023 Tripathi, Singh, Singh, Bala, Pathak, Singh, Chauhan and Singh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Manikant Tripathi, manikant.microbio@gmail.com; Pradeep Kumar Singh, pkbt99@gmail.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work