Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 14 March 2023
Sec. Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants

Impact of intercropping grass on the soil rhizosphere microbial community and soil ecosystem function in a walnut orchard

\nChangxi WangChangxi Wang1Qiang Liang,Qiang Liang1,2Jianning LiuJianning Liu1Rui ZhouRui Zhou1Xinya LangXinya Lang1Shengyi XuShengyi Xu1Xichen LiXichen Li1Andi GongAndi Gong1Yutian MuYutian Mu1Hongcheng Fang,
Hongcheng Fang1,2*Ke Qiang Yang,
Ke Qiang Yang1,2*
  • 1College of Forestry, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong, China
  • 2State Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Silviculture in the Downstream Areas of the Yellow River, Shandong Taishan Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Tai'an, Shandong, China

The intercropping of grass in orchards has beneficial effects on soil properties and soil microbial communities and is an important soil management measure for improving orchard productivity and land-use efficiency. However, few studies have explored the effects of grass intercropping on rhizosphere microorganisms in walnut orchards. In this study, we explored the microbial communities of clear tillage (CT), walnut/ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) (Lp), and walnut/hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.) (Vv) intercropping system using MiSeq sequencing and metagenomic sequencing. The results revealed that the composition and structure of the soil bacterial community changed significantly with walnut/Vv intercropping compared to CT and walnut/Lp intercropping. Moreover, the walnut/hairy vetch intercropping system had the most complex connections between bacterial taxa. In addition, we found that the soil microorganisms of walnut/Vv intercropping had a higher potential for nitrogen cycling and carbohydrate metabolism, which may be related to the functions of Burkholderia, Rhodopseudomonas, Pseudomonas, Agrobacterium, Paraburkholderia, and Flavobacterium. Overall, this study provided a theoretical basis for understanding the microbial communities associated with grass intercropping in walnut orchards, providing better guidance for the management of walnut orchards.

Introduction

Walnut (Juglans regia L.) is an important woody oil tree species that is widely cultivated globally because it is rich in proteins, unsaturated fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals conducive to health (Bernard et al., 2018; Ji et al., 2021). However, with the expansion of the cultivation area and extensive management measures, the yield of high-quality walnut nuts results in poor economic benefits. In recent years, intercropping with grass in orchards has emerged as a simple and efficient measure for enhancing fruit tree cultivation and management (Li et al., 2022). Therefore, studying grass intercropping in walnut orchards and clarifying the knowledge gap related to the rhizosphere microbiome under this intercropping system is crucial for the development of the walnut industry. Grass cultivation stabilizes soil aggregates, conserves water and soil, improves soil physical properties, and increases soil nutrient availability, which are beneficial for tree growth and development (Hoagland et al., 2008; Ramos et al., 2011; Wei et al., 2017). In addition, grass cultivation can also improve the community composition of soil microorganisms, thus changing the interaction between plants and microorganisms (Rieux et al., 1999).

Soil microorganisms, encompassing bacteria, fungi, and archaea, play a significant role in conserving multiple soil ecosystem functions, including soil nutrient cycling and soil organic matter content and composition (Wagg et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2015; Fierer, 2017). The pH, organic matter, nutrient content, and particle fraction of the soil are shown to impact microbial community diversity and components (Aciego Pietri and Brookes, 2009; Cheng et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2021). Correspondingly, functional microbial biomass also promotes soil nitrification progress and soil enzyme activities (Shi et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2021). Recently, the critical role of soil microorganisms in plant growth has also been widely studied. Bacillus strains isolated from the rhizosphere soil of sugarcane have an N-fixation function and can resist Sporisorium scitamineum and Ceratocystis paradoxa (Singh et al., 2020). Furthermore, soil microbiomes can regulate plant growth, drought stress, and the leaf metabolome of Arabidopsis thaliana (Badri et al., 2013; Zolla et al., 2013). Therefore, understanding the effects of orchard grass on soil microorganism functions is necessary to accurately assess ecosystem functions.

Recently, with the advancement of high-throughput sequencing and next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) approaches, the composition and structure of soil microbial communities have been extensively studied (Navarrete et al., 2015). Intercropping of Trifolium (Trifolium repens L.)/cucumber and mustard (Brassica juncea L.)/cucumber notably increases soil bacterial and fungal community diversity based on MiSeq sequencing of 16S rRNA and ITS genes (Li and Wu, 2018). Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing technology indicated that continuous sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) cropping reduces the diversity of bacterial and fungal communities and the soil microbial community structure (Pang et al., 2021). In addition, the emergence of metagenomics has provided deep insights into the function of soil microbial communities. Metagenomics and comparative genomics have demonstrated that carbohydrate and secondary metabolite transport functionalities are overrepresented within drought-enriched taxa (Xu et al., 2021). The functions of secondary metabolite biosynthesis genes in soil bacterial communities are also characterized using metagenomics (Crits-Christoph et al., 2018).

In this study, we performed MiSeq sequencing of 16S rRNA genes and metagenomic sequencing of rhizosphere bacterial communities to analyze their differences in clear tillage (CT), ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)/walnut (Lp), and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.)/walnut (Vv) intercropping systems. The results showed that the soil properties and microbial structure and diversity were considerably affected by grass intercropping. Furthermore, the soil microorganisms of walnut/Vv intercropping had a higher potential for nitrogen cycling and carbohydrate metabolism, which may be related to the functions of Burkholderia, Rhodopseudomonas, Pseudomonas, Agrobacterium, Paraburkholderia, and Flavobacterium as they were significantly and positively correlated with soil organic matter (SOM) and total nitrogen (TN). These results will provide metagenomic insights for evaluating the effects of walnut/grass intercropping on the microecological environment.

Materials and methods

Site description and sample collection

The study was conducted in a walnut orchard at the Forestry Experimental Station of Shandong Agricultural University in Tai'an city, Shandong Province, China (117°8′59″E, 36°10′16″N), at an altitude of 135.6 m, with an average annual rainfall of 740 mm, and an average annual temperature of 12.9°C. The soil type is brown soil.

The walnut tree variety was “Ruixiu,” which had been cultivated at the site for 8 years. The trial consisted of three treatments, with perennial ryegrass and hairy vetch as intercropping grasses and a clear tillage control. Ryegrass/walnut, hairy vetch/walnut intercropping systems, and clear tillage were represented by Lp, Vv, and CT, respectively. The perennial ryegrass and hairy vetch were planted for 3 consecutive years (during which the weed-free area was maintained), and the clear tillage plots were managed with normal weeding for 3 consecutive years. Three plots were set up for each treatment, with a total of nine plots separated by a barrier strip between the different treatments. Five soil samples were collected and mixed from each plot. In mid-June 2021, the fine roots of the walnut trees were collected from the same part of the walnut tree roots (20 cm from the surface) in each sample plot. The surface soil was removed by shaking the roots, and the rhizosphere soil was collected into sterile bags placed in 4°C ice boxes, which were brought back to the laboratory immediately. The fresh soil samples were divided into two parts: One part was dried, ground, and sieved through a 100-mesh sieve for soil nutrient and enzyme activity determination, and the other part was stored at −80°C for the determination of various microbial indicators.

Analysis of soil physicochemical properties and enzyme activity

Soil pH was determined by an acidity meter (soil/water = 1/2.5) according to Pang et al. (2021). The SOM was assessed by the potassium dichromate volumetric-external heating method, TN was determined using the Kjeldahl method (Ding et al., 2019), and total phosphorus (TP) and available phosphorus (AP) were determined by the Mo-Sb colorimetric method, total potassium (TK) and available potassium (AK) was determined by the atomic absorption method (Li and Liu, 2017), and available nitrogen (AN) was determined by the alkaline hydrolyzable diffusion method (Liu et al., 2009).

Urease (UE), sucrase (SC), neutral phosphatase (NP), dehydrogenase (DH), and nitrate reductase (NR) were determined by the visible spectrophotometric method, and the kits were purchased from Suzhou Grace Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

DNA extraction and PCR amplification of 16S rRNA

A Mo Bio PowerSoil® DNA kit (QIAGEN, Shanghai, China) was used to extract the total soil microbial DNA (genomic DNA, gDNA) according to the kit instructions, and the quality and concentration of the extracted DNA were determined by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis and a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer, respectively (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

The highly variable V3–V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the 341F (CCTAYGGGRBGCASCAG) and 806R (GGACTACNNGGGTATC TAAT) primers. The PCR was performed in a total volume of 50 μl, which contained 25 μl of PCR Mix Buffer (using Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix with HF Buffer), 3 μl of DMSO, 3 μl each of F/R primers, and 10 ng of gDNA. The amplification conditions were as follows: one pre-denaturation cycle at 98°C for 30 s, 30 denaturation cycles at 98°C for 15 s, annealing at 58°C for 15 s, extension at 72°C for 15 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 1 min. The PCR amplification products were detected by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the target fragments were recovered by a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA, cat: 28706X4). The recovered PCR products were quantified by a Microplate reader (BioTek, FLx800) using a Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA, Cat# P7589) with reference to the preliminary quantification results of electrophoresis. Equal amounts of PCR products were used to construct sequencing libraries using TruSeq Nano DNA LT Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and the constructed libraries were sequenced by the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with a sequencing strategy of PE250 (paired-end sequencing 250 × 2).

The sequenced data were analyzed using the Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME2) pipeline. In brief, DADA2 was used to initially process the reads by removing the PCR primer sequences, splice sequences, and sequences of low quality (Q < 30). Then, the naive Bayesian classifier method in the DADA2 pipeline (v 1.16.0) algorithm was used to cluster the reads into amplicon sequencing variants (ASVs), and the Silva reference database (version 138.1) was used to assign the taxonomy of each ASV. QIIME 2 was then applied to calculate alpha diversity, including Chao1 richness, Pielou's evenness, and Shannon diversity. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed to assess beta diversity, and the ANOSIM test was used to examine the significance using the “vegan” (v 2.6-2) package (Oksanen et al., 2014).

Metagenomic sequencing analysis

The same soil DNA extractions were used for shotgun metagenomic sequencing. In brief, a library with an insert size of 300 bp was constructed using ~1 μg of DNA and then sequenced by the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform using the PE150 strategy (paired-end sequencing 150 × 2). The raw downstream data were quality-controlled using Trimmomatic (v 0.39) to remove reads with average quality scores of <30 (Q30) and length of <50 bp. The clean reads after QC were assembled using Megahit (v1.2.9), and contigs with lengths >300 bp were retained. The open reading frames (ORFs) in the contigs were predicted using Megahit (v1.2.9) with default parameters, and ORFs with lengths >100 bp were clustered as the non-redundant gene catalog using CD-HIT (v4.8.1) with 95% identity and 90% coverage. Metabolic function annotations of non-redundant genes were obtained using KofamScan (v1.3.0) for homology comparison with the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database. The expression of genes in different samples was calculated using SOAP2 (v2.21) as the reads per kilobase of reads per million (RPKM). Taxonomic classification of bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses was assigned to metagenomic reads using Kraken2, an improved metagenomic taxonomy classifier that utilizes k-mer-based algorithms. Differences at the species level were analyzed using the “edgeR (v3.38.1)” package, and the screening criteria for differences were log2 (FC) > 1||log2 (FC) <−1 and p-value <0.005. Differentiated species were plotted using the “ggplot2” (v3.4.0) package, and enriched or depleted species belonging to phyla were visualized using the “fmsb” (0.7.3) package.

Rhizosphere microbiota network construction

To reduce the complexity of the network, species with abundance >0.1%, which accounted for more than 85% of the total samples on average, were selected for Spearman's correlation calculations (P < 0.05), and the network was visualized using Gephi.

Statistical analysis

The redundancy analysis (RDA) function of the vegan (v2.6-2) package in R was used to conduct RDA of multiple correlation variations among environmental factors and community composition at the genus level (permutations = 999). LDA effect size (LEfSe) analysis based on genus level among the groups was combined with non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon's rank sum tests to screen species with significant differences between groups and conduct a comparative analysis of differences. Then, the “psych” (v2.2.5) package was used to calculate Spearman's correlations and significance between soil physicochemical properties and differential genus abundance, and the correlation was demonstrated using the “pheatmap” (v1.0.12) package.

One-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's HSD multiple range tests were performed to detect differences in soil physicochemical properties and alpha diversity indices between different groups using SPSS 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). PCoA based on the Bray–Curtis distance matrix was conducted with the vegan package to ordinate the microbial community structure between different treatments. Kraken2 was used for species annotation, and then Bracken was used to calculate the relative abundance of the species annotation results. KofamScan was used for KEGG annotations, and eggNOG-mapper software was used to annotate the Clusters of Orthologous Genes (COG) and Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes (CAZy) results.

Results

The physicochemical properties and enzyme activity of the soil from different sampling sites

The soil physicochemical properties of the walnut orchards among the three sampling sites, CT, and grassed with Lp and Vv are shown in Table 1. The Lp and Vv treatments both significantly increased the SOM and AK content compared to the CT treatment, whereas the pH decreased significantly. The content of SOM and AK increased by 15.09 and 44.57%, respectively, in Lp and by 53.03 and 79.13%, respectively, in Vv, compared to that in the CT. The Vv treatment significantly increased the TN and AP content compared to the control, but the content of TN and AP was not significantly different between the Lp treatment and the CT treatment. In addition, the activities of soil urease (S-UE), soil sucrase (S-SC), soil neutral phosphatase (S-NP), and soil dehydrogenase (SDHA) in the two intercropping systems were significantly higher than those of the CT. These results showed that intercropping with grass can improve the soil physicochemical properties in walnut orchards, particularly the Vv intercropping treatment.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Basic physicochemical parameters and five major enzyme activities among the treatments.

Characteristics of the different grassed soil bacterial communities

To estimate the effects of orchard grass on soil bacterial communities, we initially undertook 16S rRNA gene sequencing. A total of 951,611 sequences clustered into 11,925 ASVs across all nine soil samples after quality filtering. For the bacterial community, 50 phyla, 132 classes, 342 orders, 512 families, 868 genera, and 796 species were detected from three soil samples, of which 281, 445, and 495 species were detected in CT, Lp, and Vv, respectively (Figure 1A, Supplementary Table 1). Among them, even if all samples had the most dominant phyla, namely Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria, their relative abundances varied among the different treatments (Figure 1B). For example, the relative abundance of Acidobacteria in the soils vegetated with Vv was 41.7%, which was significantly higher than that in Lp (30.8%) and CT soil (26.8%) (Supplementary Table 2). To further clarify the soil bacterial community changes induced by cropping with various types of grass, we identified the significantly enriched/depleted ASVs in Lp vs. CT and Vv vs. CT based on the edgeR analysis. A total of 24 ASVs and 55 ASVs were significantly enriched in Lp vs. CT and Vv vs. CT, respectively. These ASVs were mainly distributed across two phyla: Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Meanwhile, there were a total of 94 ASVs and 58 ASVs depleted in Lp vs. CT and Vv vs. CT, respectively, which were also mainly distributed across Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes (Supplementary Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Structure of soil bacterial communities based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing in three soil samples. (A) Venn diagrams of exclusive and shared bacterial species. (B) Relative abundances of the top-10 dominant strains at the phylum level. (C) Alpha diversity estimates of bacterial communities. (D) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot of ASVs based on the Bray–Curtis distance matrix.

Then, we estimated the alpha diversity indices (Chao richness, Pielou's evenness, and Shannon index) based on the ASV level. Orchard grass significantly increased bacterial ASV richness compared to the control soil as shown in Figure 1C. The bacterial ASV richness indices were 4,241 and 3,492 in the soil vegetated with Lp and Vv, respectively, which were higher than that in the control soil (2,893). The evenness and diversity level of the soil with Vv were slightly lower, while no difference was observed between Lp and CT (Figure 1C). Meanwhile, PCoA of CT, Lp, and Vv was performed to identify the dissimilarity between the treatments. The PCoA showed that PC1 explained 33.79% of the variation and PC2 explained 30.02% of the variation, and the bacteria in the soils vegetated with Lp and Vv were distinctly separated from those in CT (R2 = 4.4012, p = 0.003) (Figure 1D). These results revealed that the intercropping grass in the walnut orchard significantly changed the soil bacterial community composition and structure, and the distinction was even more significant for the soil vegetated with Vv.

Characteristics of the different soil microbiomes using metagenomics

We further confirmed that the intercropping with grass in the walnut orchard induced changes in the soil microbial community based on metagenomic sequencing. The PCoA showed that walnut/Vv was clearly clustered into one group and was significantly separated from the CT and walnut/Lp soils along the first principal coordinate (83.48%) using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity (Figure 2A). The variation in the PCoA of the metagenomic sequences was lower than that of 16S, which may be caused by the different compositions of the bacterial populations according to the two sequencing methods. Consistent with the 16S rRNA sequencing analysis, at the phylum level, soils vegetated with Vv were characterized by a significant increase in Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria and a decrease in Bacteroidetes compared to the control, while the composition and structure of the soil microbiome in soils vegetated with Lp did not differ significantly from that in CT (Figure 2B). At the family level, an expansion of Bradyrhizobiaceae, Burkholderiaceae, Comamonadaceae, and Moraxellaceae was observed in walnut/Vv soils compared to CT and Lp soils, while several families exhibited a significantly lower relative abundance, including Enterobacteriaceae, Hominidae, Prevotellaceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Selenomonadaceae (Figure 2C).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Microbiome compositions of bacterial taxa based on metagenomic sequencing between different treatments. (A) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of different soil samples based on the Bray–Curtis distance matrix at the species level. (B) Relative abundances of different phyla in the soil samples. (C) Taxonomic histogram of the top 25 most-abundant bacteria at the family level.

Meanwhile, to determine the differences in rhizosphere bacterial assemblages in the different intercropping systems, we constructed co-occurrence networks. Our results showed that the bacterial assemblages of Vv formed a larger network diameter, more edges, larger average path length, and higher average degree compared to CT and Lp. The ratio of positive to negative connections was 1.4 in Vv and 3.6 and 2.9 in CT and Lp, respectively, indicating the presence of more competitive or inhibitory connections in Vv (Figure 3, Supplementary Table 3). Overall, the walnut/Vv intercropping system had the most complex rhizosphere microbial network.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Variation of rhizospheric bacterial networks caused by intercropping. Co-occurrence networks of the different treatments. Only the nodes with Spearman's correlation coefficient r > 0.8, P < 0.01 or r < −0.8, P < 0.01 are shown. Nodes represent the species identified by Kraken2 in meta, and the edges between the nodes indicate significant correlations. A red edge indicates positive covariation between two individual nodes, while a green edge indicates negative covariation. The size of each node is proportional to the number of connections, while the colors of the nodes indicate major phyla.

Functional characteristics of the different soil microbiomes

To explore the characteristics of the potential functional genes in the different vegetated soils, functional annotation of the assembled metagenomes was performed using the KEGG and EggNOG databases. The PCoA results of the KEGG pathway showed that along the first principal coordinate, the Vv treatment showed maximal differences (68.85%) compared to the CT treatment, followed by the Lp treatment (Figure 4A). The PCoA results of EggNOG exhibited the same trend, and the maximum difference between Vv and CT was 41.95% (Figure 4B). Compared to the CT and Lp treatments, the microbiomes in Vv exhibited a higher metabolic potential for substance and energy metabolism (Figure 4C, Supplementary Figure 2). For instance, the relative abundances of carbohydrate metabolism genes were 17.77 in the soils vegetated with Vv, which was significantly higher than the values in the soils vegetated with Lp (10.95%) and the control (10.64%). The relative abundance ofenergy metabolism in the soils vegetated with Vv was 12.44%, while that in the Lp and CT treatments was 9.70% and 9.99, respectively (Supplementary Figure 2, Table 4). Similarly, the EggNOG annotation also revealed that the soil of Vv exhibited significantly increased carbohydrate transport and metabolism, energy production and conversion, and amino acid transport and metabolism (Supplementary Figure 3).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Overview of functional genes in the soil under different treatments. (A) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot of KEGG functions on the basis of Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. (B) PCoA plot of COG functions on the basis of Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. (C) Relative abundance of the 30 most-abundant KEGG pathways under different treatments.

Meanwhile, the LEfSe analysis of the KEGG pathways showed that the microbiomes in the Vv soils exhibited a higher metabolic potential for N and C (Figure 4C). In the N cycle, Vv increased the functional potential of dissimilatory nitrate reduction and nitrification compared with the CT and Lp treatments. In addition, Vv also increased the metabolic potential of functions related to carbohydrate metabolism and carbon fixation. Among them, pentose and glucuronate interconversions, ascorbate and aldarate metabolism, and amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism in carbohydrate metabolism were significantly enriched in the Vv treatment. In addition, the hydroxypropionate–hydroxybutyrate cycle, reductive citrate cycle, and 3-hydroxypropionate bi-cycle in carbon fixation were also significantly enriched in the Vv treatment (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Heatmaps showing differences in the relative abundances of functions related to the N cycle, C metabolism, and C fixation in all treatments.

Relationship between soil properties and microbial structure

To define the effects of the changes in soil physicochemical properties on the soil microbial community compositions and structure, RDA was conducted. It showed that the first two RDA components (RDA1 and RDA2) explained 77.62 and 14.47% of the total variance in the bacterial community, respectively. The AK, AP, TN, SOM, S-UE, SDHA, and S-SC were significantly correlated with bacterial communities in the Vv soil samples, whereas only PH, S-NR, and TK were correlated with the bacterial communities in the CT soil samples (Figure 6A, Supplementary Table 5). Meanwhile, we conducted LEfSe analysis of all bacteria at the genus level to determine specific bacteria with significant differences in abundance in different soils based on LDA > 2.5. Faecalibacterium and Megamonas were enriched in the CT soil samples. Roseburia, Streptococcus, Escherichia, Ligilactobacillus, Weissella, and Shigella were enriched in the Lp soil samples. Pseudomonas, Paraburkholderia, Burkholderia, Agrobacterium, Flavobacterium, Rhodopseudomonas, Ralstonia, Enterobacter, and Desulfobulbus were significantly enriched in the Vv soil samples (Figure 6B, Supplementary Table 6).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Relationship between soil properties and microbial structure. (A) Redundancy analysis (RDA) of soil physicochemical properties. (B) LDA effect size (LEfSe) analysis of all bacteria at the genus level. (C) Spearman's correlation analysis between environmental factors and the dominant genera of the bacterial communities in different soils.

Then, Spearman's correlation analysis was conducted to define the correlation between environmental factors and the dominant genera of the bacterial communities in different soils. The bacterial genera were identified as significantly correlated with the soil properties based on the threshold of |R| > 0.70 and P < 0.05. Among the bacterial genera, Faecalibacterium, Megamonas, Escherichia, Burkholderia, Rhodopseudomonas, Pseudomonas, Agrobacterium, Enterobacter, Paraburkholderia, and Flavobacterium were the key taxa highly related to soil properties. For instance, Burkholderia was significantly and positively correlated with SOM (R = 0.80, P < 0.05), TN (R = 0.67, P < 0.05), AP (R = 0.78, P < 0.05), S-UE (R = 0.82, P < 0.05), S-NP (R = 0.78, P < 0.05), and SDHA (R = 0.73, P < 0.05). By contrast, Faecalibacterium was negatively correlated with SOM (R = −0.80, P < 0.05), TN (R = −0.88, P < 0.05), AP (R = −0.88, P < 0.05), AK (R = −0.71, P < 0.05), S-UE (R = −0.87, P < 0.05), and S-NP (R = −0.92, P < 0.05). Among them, Pseudomonas, Paraburkholderia, Burkholderia, Agrobacterium, Flavobacterium, and Rhodopseudomonas, which were enriched in the Vv soil samples, were significantly and positively correlated with TN (Figure 6C, Supplementary Table 7).

Discussion

Intercropping with grass in orchards is considered a simple and efficient management measure to improve SOM and nutrient contents (Wu et al., 2011; Qiao et al., 2014). The plants reported for orchard intercropping are generally natural grass, ryegrass, alfalfa, clover, and Vulpia myuros (Coller et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2022). A previous study found that interplanting with Vulpia myuros could enhance the physicochemical properties of soils and provide nutrients for fruit trees (Brown and Rice, 2010). In this study, the soil physicochemical properties were analyzed in CT, walnut/Lp, and walnut/Vv intercropping systems. Compared to the CT treatment, the Lp and Vv treatments both significantly increased the content of SOM and AK and the activities of S-UE, S-SC, S-NP, and SDHA. Moreover, the Vv treatment significantly increased the content of TN and AP compared to the control, which was not significantly different between the Lp treatment and the CT treatment.

Intercropping with grass also modulated the abundance and composition of the soil microbial community. In apple orchards, intercropping with licorice and grass could significantly affect the composition and structure of the soil microbial community (Li et al., 2022). Intercropping with white clover or alfalfa dramatically enhanced the microbial biomass carbon content and the abundance of Actinomycetes, and intercropping with ryegrass significantly increased the abundance of Nitrospira species (Rodríguez-Loinaz et al., 2008). Moreover, Bever found that legume intercropping plants not only improved the variety of the microbial community but also increased the abundance of beneficial soil microbes in the orchard (Bever, 2015). The results of this study provide further evidence that intercropping with grass can alter the soil bacterial community composition and structure through 16S gene sequencing and metagenomic sequencing. Interestingly, the composition and structure of the bacterial community in the soil intercropped with Vv were more significantly changed than those in CT and intercropping with Lp. In addition, the co-occurrence networks confirmed that the walnut/Vv intercropping system had the most complex rhizosphere microbial network. This result may be due to the rapid creeping growth of Vv in spring, which then decays after withering in summer to improve SOM and allow Metarhizium anisopliae and Bacillus subtilis to thrive.

As a leguminous plant, Vv alters the nutrient status of soils by fixing atmospheric N in association with compatible rhizobia, mainly Rhizobium leguminosarum symbiovar viceae (Gentry et al., 2013; Yuan et al., 2016; Renzi et al., 2020). The exudates of leguminous plant roots modify the soil microbial diversity, structure, and functional groups associated with the N cycle (Zhang et al., 2021). Recent studies have reported that leguminous plants promote biological N fixation to enhance soil N and C storage (Sun et al., 2022). Chinese fir plantations intercropped with leguminous plants can promote the diversity of soil microbial communities by increasing the soil N content (Zhang et al., 2020). Similar to the aforementioned research, compared to CT and Lp, the TN content was significantly increased in the Vv treatment. In addition, the microbiomes in the Vv soils exhibited a higher metabolic potential for substance and energy metabolism, especially the N cycle and C metabolism based on the LEfSe analysis of KEGG pathways. These results indicate that intercropping with Vv in a walnut orchard significantly increased the C and N content through the soil bacterial community enrichment in C metabolism and the N cycle.

Previous studies have shown that soil physicochemical properties play a key role in mediating microbial community structure and many bacterial communities arehighly correlated with specific soil factors, which have been used as indicators of soil condition (Lauber et al., 2008; Kuramae et al., 2012; Val-Moraes et al., 2016). Pang et al. (2021) found that Arthrobacter abundance showed a positive correlation with pH and that Bradyrhizobium, Sphingomonas, Streptomyces, and Burkholderia showed a negative correlation with pH and TS in continuous cropping of sugarcane. In our study, the RDA showed that AK, AP, TN, SOM, S-UE, SDHA, and S-SC were significantly correlated with the bacterial communities in the Vv soil samples. In addition, walnut orchard intercropping with Vv better enriched the bacterial genera including Pseudomonas, Paraburkholderia, Burkholderia, Agrobacterium, Flavobacterium, Rhodopseudomonas, Ralstonia, Enterobacter, and Desulfobulbus. Among them, Pseudomonas, Paraburkholderia, Burkholderia, Agrobacterium, Flavobacterium, and Rhodopseudomonas were significantly and positively correlated with TN. These results indicated that these bacterial genera likely play an important role in the N cycle, but the specific functions need further verification.

Conclusion

In summary, both the Lp and Vv intercropping systems altered the soil physicochemical properties and microbial community structure compared to CT, with the latter being particularly significant. The KEGG pathway results showed that the soil microorganisms of walnut/Vv intercropping had a higher potential for N cycling and C metabolism. Meanwhile, we hypothesized that TN-related bacterial genera such as Burkholderia, Rhodopseudomonas, Pseudomonas, Agrobacterium, Paraburkholderia, and Flavobacterium may play an important role in the N cycle. Therefore, our future research focus is to isolate these novel bacterial genera and verify their interactions with host plants. Overall, these findings can suggest agricultural management and microbial applications in walnut orchards.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.

Author contributions

HF and KQY designed and supervised the research. CW performed the experiments. JL and QL analyzed the data. CW and HF wrote the original draft manuscript. RZ, XLa, SX, XLi, AG, and YM reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32001340), the Improved Variety Program of Shandong Province of China (2020LZGC090102), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020QC169).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank KeGene Science and Technology Co., Ltd. for providing technical support.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1137590/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1. Different types of grasses are enriched and depleted for certain metagenomic species in the soil. The enriched/depleted species are the species with significantly different abundance compared to the species in CT samples based on “edgeR” analysis. (A) Enrichment and depletion of the species included in the soils vegetated with different grasses. (B) Phylum annotation of the differentially enriched or depleted species.

Supplementary Figure 2. Relative abundance of KEGG functional pathways.

Supplementary Figure 3. Distribution of all EggNOG genes under different treatments, grouped into EggNOG categories.

Supplementary Table 1. Soil bacterial communities in different treatments.

Supplementary Table 2. Relative abundances of the top-10 dominant strains at the phylum level.

Supplementary Table 3. Topological properties of the co-occurrence networks.

Supplementary Table 4. Relative abundance of KEGG functional pathways.

Supplementary Table 5. Redundancy analysis (RDA) of soil physicochemical properties.

Supplementary Table 6. LDA effect size (LEfSe) analysis of all bacteria at the genus level.

Supplementary Table 7. Spearman's correlation analysis between environmental factors and the dominant genera of the bacterial communities in different soils.

References

Aciego Pietri, J. C., and Brookes, P. C. (2009). Substrate inputs and pH as factors controlling microbial biomass, activity and community structure in an arable soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 1396–1405. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Badri, D. V., Zolla, G., Bakker, M. G., Manter, D. K., and Vivanco, J. M. (2013). Potential impact of soil microbiomes on the leaf metabolome and on herbivore feeding behavior. New Phytol. 198, 264–273. doi: 10.1111/nph.12124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bernard, A., Lheureux, F., and Dirlewanger, E. (2018). Walnut: past and future of genetic improvement. Tree Genet. Genomes 14, 28. doi: 10.1007/s11295-017-1214-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bever, J. D. (2015). Preferential allocation, physio-evolutionary feedbacks, and the stability and environmental patterns of mutualism between plants and their root symbionts. New Phytol. 205, 1503–1514. doi: 10.1111/nph.13239

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown, C. S., and Rice, K. J. (2010). Effects of belowground resource use comlementarity on invasion of constructed grassland plant communities. Biol. Invasions 12, 1319–1334. doi: 10.1007/s10530-009-9549-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Han, M., Yuan, X., Cao, G., and Zhu, B. (2021). Seasonal changes in soil properties, microbial biomass and enzyme activities across the soil profile in two alpine ecosystems. Soil Ecol. Lett. 3, 383–394. doi: 10.1007/s42832-021-0101-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, J. M., Han, Z. J., Cong, J., Yu, J. J., Zhou, J. Z., Zhao, M. X., et al. (2021). Edaphic variables are better indicators of soil microbial functional structure than plant-related ones in subtropical broad-leaved forests. Sci. Total Environ. 773, 10. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145630

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coller, E., Cestaro, A., Zanzotti, R., Bertoldi, D., Pindo, M., Larger, S., et al. (2019). Microbiome of vineyard soils is shaped by geography and management. Microbiome 7, 15. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0758-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Crits-Christoph, A., Diamond, S., Butterfield, C. N., Thomas, B. C., and Banfield, J. F. (2018). Novel soil bacteria possess diverse genes for secondary metabolite biosynthesis. Nature 558, 440. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0207-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ding, G. C., Bai, M. H., Han, H., Li, H. X., Ding, X. Y., Yang, H. F., et al. (2019). Microbial taxonomic, nitrogen cycling and phosphorus recycling community composition during long-term organic greenhouse farming. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 95, 12. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiz042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fierer, N. (2017). Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 579–590. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gentry, L. E., Snapp, S. S., Price, R. F., and Gentry, L. F. (2013). Apparent red clover nitrogen credit to corn: evaluating cover crop introduction. Agron. J. 105, 1658–1664. doi: 10.2134/agronj2013.0089

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoagland, L., Carpenter-Boggs, L., Granatstein, D., Mazzola, M., Smith, J., Peryea, F., et al. (2008). Orchard floor management effects on nitrogen fertility and soil biological activity in a newly established organic apple orchard. Biol. Fert. Soils 45, 11–18. doi: 10.1007/s00374-008-0304-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ji, F. Y., Ma, Q. G., Zhang, W. T., Liu, J., Feng, Y., Zhao, P., et al. (2021). A genome variation map provides insights into the genetics of walnut adaptation and agronomic traits. Genome Biol. 22, 22. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02517-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuramae, E. E., Yergeau, E., Wong, L. C., Pijl, A. S., van Veen, J. A., and Kowalchuk, G. A. (2012). Soil characteristics more strongly influence soil bacterial communities than land-use type. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 79, 12–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01192.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lauber, C. L., Strickland, M. S., Bradford, M. A., and Fierer, N. (2008). The influence of soil properties on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities across land-use types. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 2407–2415. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S., and Wu, F. Z. (2018). Diversity and co-occurrence patterns of soil bacterial and fungal communities in seven intercropping systems. Front. Microbiol. 9, 13. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01521

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, W. H., and Liu, Q. Z. (2017). The dynamic characteristics of soil enzyme activity and nematode diversity in replanted strawberry rhizosphere soil. Acta Hortic. 1156, 235–242. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1156.36

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X. L., Chu, Y. N., Jia, Y. H., Yue, H. Y., Han, Z. H., and Wang, Y. (2022). Changes to bacterial communities and soil metabolites in an apple orchard as a legacy effect of different intercropping plants and soil management practices. Front. Microbiol. 13, 15. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.956840

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J. G., Zhang, W., Li, Y. B., Sun, Y. Y., and Bian, X. M. (2009). Effects of long-term continuous cropping system of cotton on soil physical-chemical properties and activities of soil enzyme in oasis in Xinjiang. Sen. Agricult. Sin. 42, 725–733. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.02.044

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Navarrete, A. A., Diniz, T. R., Braga, L. P. P., Silva, G. G. Z., Franchini, J. C., Rossetto, R., et al. (2015). Multi-analytical approach reveals potential microbial indicators in soil for sugarcane model systems. PLoS ONE 10, 19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129765

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O'Hara, R. B., et al. (2014). Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.6-2. Available online at: http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=vegan

Google Scholar

Pang, Z. Q., Dong, F., Liu, Q., Lin, W. X., Hu, C. H., and Yuan, Z. N. A. (2021). Soil metagenomics reveals effects of continuous sugarcane cropping on the structure and functional pathway of rhizospheric microbial community. Front. Microbiol. 12, 19. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.627569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qiao, Y. F., Miao, S. J., Silva, L. C. R., and Horwath, W. R. (2014). Understory species regulate litter decomposition and accumulation of C and N in forest soils: a long-term dual-isotope experiment. Forest Ecol. Manag. 329, 318–327. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ramos, M. E., Robles, A. B., Sanchez-Navarro, A., and Gonzalez-Rebollar, J. L. (2011). Soil responses to different management practices in rainfed orchards in semiarid environments. Soil Till. Res. 112, 85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2010.11.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Renzi, J. P., Chantre, G. R., Smykal, P., Presotto, A. D., Zubiaga, L., Garayalde, A. F., et al. (2020). Diversity of naturalized hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) populations in central argentina as a source of potential adaptive traits for breeding. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 14. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00189

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rieux, R., Simon, S., and Defrance, H. (1999). Role of hedgerows and ground cover management on arthropod populations in pear orchards. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 73, 119–127. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00021-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Loinaz, G., Onaindia, M., Amezaga, I., Mijangos, I., and Garbisu, C. (2008). Relationship between vegetation diversity and soil functional diversity in native mixed-oak forests. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 49–60. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.04.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, X. Z., Hu, H. W., Zhu-Barker, X., Hayden, H., Wang, J. T., Suter, H., et al. (2017). Nitrifier-induced denitrification is an important source of soil nitrous oxide and can be inhibited by a nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 4851–4865. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13872

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, R. K., Singh, P., Li, H. B., Song, Q. Q., Guo, D. J., Solanki, M. K., et al. (2020). Diversity of nitrogen-fixing rhizobacteria associated with sugarcane: a comprehensive study of plant-microbe interactions for growth enhancement in Saccharum spp. BMC Plant Biol. 20, 21. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02400-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, L., Gao, J. S., Huang, T., Kendall, J. R. A., Shen, Q. R., and Zhang, R. F. (2015). Parental material and cultivation determine soil bacterial community structure and fertility. FEMS Microbiol. 91, 10. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiu010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, Y., Chen, L., Zhang, S. Y., Miao, Y. T., Zhang, Y., Li, Z. L., et al. (2022). Plant interaction patterns shape the soil microbial community and nutrient cycling in different intercropping scenarios of aromatic plant species. Front. Microbiol. 13, 19. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.888789

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Val-Moraes, S. P., de Macedo, H. S., Kishi, L. T., Pereira, R. M., Navarrete, A. A., Mendes, L. W., et al. (2016). Liming in the sugarcane burnt system and the green harvest practice affect soil bacterial community in northeastern So Paulo, Brazil. Anton. Leeuw. Int. J. G. 109, 1643–1654. doi: 10.1007/s10482-016-0764-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wagg, C., Bender, S. F., Widmer, F., and van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2014). Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5266–5270. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320054111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, H., Xiang, Y. Z., Liu, Y., and Zhang, J. E. (2017). Effects of sod cultivation on soil nutrients in orchards across China: a meta-analysis. Soil Till. Res. 169, 16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2017.01.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, D. M., Yu, Y. C., Xia, L. Z., Yin, S. X., and Yang, L. Z. (2011). Soil fertility indices of citrus orchard land along topographic gradients in the three gorges area of China. Pedosphere 21, 782–792. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(11)60182-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, L., Dong, Z. B., Chiniquy, D., Pierroz, G., Deng, S. W., Gao, C., et al. (2021). Genome-resolved metagenomics reveals role of iron metabolism in drought-induced rhizosphere microbiome dynamics. Nat. Commun. 12, 17. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23553-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, K., Miwa, H., Iizuka, M., Yokoyama, T., Fujii, Y., and Okazaki, S. (2016). Genetic diversity and symbiotic phenotype of hairy vetch rhizobia in Japan. Microbes Environ. 31, 121–126. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME15184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Han, M. Z., Song, M. N., Tian, J., Song, B. Z., Hu, Y. J., et al. (2021). Intercropping with aromatic plants increased the soil organic matter content and changed the microbial community in a pear orchard. Front. Microbiol. 12, 15. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.616932

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Hou, L., Li, Z., Zhao, D., Song, L., Shao, G., et al. (2020). Leguminous supplementation increases the resilience of soil microbial community and nutrients in Chinese fir plantations. Sci. Total Environ. 703, 134917. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134917

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, W., Zhao, Z. Y., Lv, F. L., Yin, Y. N., Wang, Z. H., Zhao, Z. Y., et al. (2021). Fungal alpha diversity influences stochasticity of bacterial and fungal community assemblies in soil aggregates in an apple orchard. Appl. Soil Ecol. 162, 11. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103878

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zolla, G., Badri, D. V., Bakker, M. G., Manter, D. K., and Viyanco, J. M. (2013). Soil microbiomes vary in their ability to confer drought tolerance to Arabidopsis. Appl. Soil Ecol. 68, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.03.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: walnut, grass intercropping, rhizosphere microorganism, bacterial community, nitrogen cycle, carbohydrate metabolism

Citation: Wang C, Liang Q, Liu J, Zhou R, Lang X, Xu S, Li X, Gong A, Mu Y, Fang H and Yang KQ (2023) Impact of intercropping grass on the soil rhizosphere microbial community and soil ecosystem function in a walnut orchard. Front. Microbiol. 14:1137590. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1137590

Received: 04 January 2023; Accepted: 16 February 2023;
Published: 14 March 2023.

Edited by:

Lisong Ma, Hebei Agricultural University, China

Reviewed by:

Chenguang Zhang, Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology, China
Xu Cheng, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen (CAAS), China

Copyright © 2023 Wang, Liang, Liu, Zhou, Lang, Xu, Li, Gong, Mu, Fang and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hongcheng Fang, Y2hlbmcyMDExNDEyaHVpJiN4MDAwNDA7MTYzLmNvbQ==; Ke Qiang Yang, eWFuZ3dlcmUmI3gwMDA0MDsxMjYuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.