- 1Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- 2School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
- 3Indonesia International Institute for Life-Sciences (i3L), Jakarta, Indonesia
- 4Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- 5Synthetic Biology for Clinical and Technological Innovation (SynCTI), National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Editorial on the Research Topic
Microbiome and human host interactions and their implications on human health
In this specialized Research Topics collection of Frontiers in Microbiology, we highlight key research papers on the microbiome and their impact on a wide variety of health conditions, such as primary hypertension, in vitro fertilization, axillary osmidrosis, as well as colorectal and oral squamous cell cancer. Four of the six papers in this collection provide insight into regional microbiome signatures by sampling the host site associated with the pathology directly, allowing for greater insight into the direct interactions between microbes and human host cells.
The role of gut microbes in health and disease has often been described from stool (Human Microbiome Project Consortium, 2012), which is easily sampled, rich in microbial diversity, density and abundance. Although the gut microbiome remains the most diverse microbial population in our human body, the functional heterogeneity of each body site, with its own unique microenvironment, would give rise to regional differences in the microbial populations and thus evoke different metabolic and immune functions.
The microbiota is emerging as one of the new frontiers in biomedical research. The research potential is as vast and diverse as the microorganisms housed within these communities. A large variety of microbial metabolites are produced by a balanced microbial community residing in the human body to support the homeostasis of metabolic and immune functions. Furthermore, in the event of a change in cell types and states within the same regions, unique host and environmental pressures drive mucosal microbiome heterogeneity, whereby these unique regional microbes may, in turn, influence disease propagation (Martinez-Guryn et al., 2019). Jin et al. explored the mucosal microbiome differences of colorectal cancer by sampling the microbiome of 392 patients from both colon cancer sites and adjacent healthy colon tissue. Colon cancer specimens were further subtyped as either proximal (right) or distal (left) colon to explore regional microbiome differences further. Other than identifying regional-specific microbiome signatures associated with the location of colon cancers, they were able to identify biomarkers of severity (i.e., Fusobacteria) and poor prognosis (Jin et al.). Similarly, Zhang et al. explored the tongue microbiome of 20 young and 20 elderly patients with oral squamous cell cancer. By using supervised machine learning to complement their differential abundance microbial analysis, they could accurately distinguish (sensitivity: 0.86, specificity: 0.94) between a young and elderly tongue cancer microbiome (Zhang et al.). It was further proposed that microbiota of the younger oral cancers were more associated with propagating inflammatory components and increased oxidative stress than the elderly. These might further lead to tumorigenesis, and thus driving a more aggressive disease course.
The following two papers by Li et al. and Wang et al. study skin and lower genital tract microbiomes, respectively, with the promise of clinical translation of microbial-based biomarkers and therapeutics to treat axillary osmidrosis and improve in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Axillary osmidrosis is a condition of offensive order resulting from the bacterial decomposition of apocrine secretions in the armpits (Morioka et al., 2020). Detrimental psychosocial effects often accompany individuals with this condition. Here, Li et al. demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of osmidrosis via topical application of a probiotic L. bulgaricus for 28 days in a pilot study of 10 patients, which was proposed to decrease the abundance of pathogenic Corynebacterium. In another study, Wang et al. recruited 150 patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). They were able to associate a distinct microbial signature in the cervix, consisting of an increased abundance of Romboutsia, Anaerococcus with success with IVF-ET, and conversely an increased abundance of Bifidobacterium, Prevotella associated with failure of IVF-ET (Wang et al.). These results support the potential of using lower genital microbial profiling to predict chances of pregnancy with IVF-ET, with the potential of regional probiotics used to correct localized dysbiosis of the cervix and vaginal, thereby increasing the success rates of IVF-ET.
Fungi are a key but often neglected element of the human microbiome. Boahen et al. reviewed how the overpopulation of Candida fungi in the vaginal microbiota can lead to vulvovaginal candidiasis. When Candida species monopolize the microbiota, they transition into the biofilm mode of growth, which enhances their virulence by hyphae formation and dispersion of yeast cells. Candida species also secrete quorum-sensing molecules (QSMs) such as farnesol and tyrosol to aid in the formation and maintenance of biofilm (Wongsuk et al., 2016). The first-in-line therapy for vulvovaginal candidiasis is an antifungal agent. However, frequent administration can lead to resistance and persister cells which may contribute to recurrent infections. Persistor C. albicans can form biofilms among themselves and, in some cases, a polymicrobial biofilm with neighboring bacteria and fungi to enhance protection against the fungicide. Given the critical role of biofilm formation in causing infection and developing resistance, therapeutics that can destroy Candida biofilms and disrupt QSM signaling are warranted. Biotics may also be used to keep Candida species at bay and restore microbial balance in combination with antifungals.
Zheng et al. investigated the effects of anti-hypertension medication on the gut microbiota of hypertensive patients. They found that most patients were prescribed medication that activates the adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway, which is an essential upstream macrophage activator. Wild-type and AMPK-knockout hypertensive mice models were used to elucidate the alteration in the microbiome. Bacteria producing short-chain fatty acids, glycan and trimethylamine were more abundant in the primary hypertensive patients taking anti-hypertensive medication than in the healthy controls (Zheng et al.). These bacteria may play essential roles in the modulation of blood pressure. Separately, functional analysis showed that glycan biosynthesis and metabolism pathways were also enhanced in hypertensive patients. The authors speculated that the AMPK activation via antihypertensive medications might trigger macrophages to regulate the gut microbiota in favor of bacteria that may help regulate blood pressure. Although the exact mechanisms have yet to be elucidated, this paper presents an exciting new direction for future hypertension research.
Currently, technologies to study low-biomass samples from tissue biopsies or other regional sites are limited to 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. As the technology progresses, we anticipate advancements in understanding microbial gene function for a holistic interpretation of microbiome-host interactions. This would further fuel the discovery and translation of targeted microbiome-based interventions for microbiome-based precision medicine.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of interest
JL is a co-founder of AMILI and serves as a member of the scientific advisory board.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012). Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 486, 207–214. doi: 10.1038/nature11234
Martinez-Guryn, K., Leone, V., and Chang, E. B. (2019). Regional diversity of the gastrointestinal microbiome. Cell Host Microbe. 26, 314–324. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.08.011
Morioka, D., Nomura, M., Lan, L., Tanaka, R., and Kadomatsu, K. (2020). Axillary Osmidrosis. Ann. Plastic Surg. 84, 722–728. doi: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002111
Keywords: microbiome, host interactions, human health and disease, metagenomic, mucosal microbiome
Citation: Leo J, Chong CW, Pribowo AY, Sutejo R and Lee JWJ (2023) Editorial: Microbiome and human host interactions and their implications on human health. Front. Microbiol. 14:1135341. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1135341
Received: 31 December 2022; Accepted: 16 January 2023;
Published: 01 February 2023.
Edited by:
George Tsiamis, University of Patras, GreeceReviewed by:
Vassiliki Karapapa, Municipality of Agrinio, GreeceCopyright © 2023 Leo, Chong, Pribowo, Sutejo and Lee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jonathan W. J. Lee, bWRjbHdqaiYjeDAwMDQwO251cy5lZHUuc2c=