Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 01 November 2022
Sec. Food Microbiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Food Pathogens and Antimicrobial Resistance View all 11 articles

Difference analysis of intestinal microbiota and metabolites in piglets of different breeds exposed to porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection

\r\nZhili Li&#x;Zhili Li1†Wandi Zhang&#x;Wandi Zhang1†Langju SuLangju Su1Zongyang HuangZongyang Huang1Weichao ZhangWeichao Zhang2Liangliang MaLiangliang Ma3Jingshuai SunJingshuai Sun1Jinyue GuoJinyue Guo1Feng WenFeng Wen1Kun MeiKun Mei1Saeed El-AshramSaeed El-Ashram4Shujian HuangShujian Huang1Yunxiang Zhao*Yunxiang Zhao1*
  • 1College of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, China
  • 2Guangxi Yangxiang Co., Ltd., Guigang, China
  • 3Liaoning Agricultural Development Service Center, Shenyang, China
  • 4Faculty of Science, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt

The gut microbial composition of the Luchuan (LC) piglet, one of China’s native breeds, has rarely been studied, especially when compared to other breeds. This study developed a porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) infection model in LC and Largewhite (LW) piglets, and analyzed the patterns and differences of intestinal microbial communities and metabolites in piglets of these two breeds after infection. The diarrhea score, survival time, and distribution of viral antigens in the intestine of piglets infected with PEDV differed among breeds, with the jejunal immunohistochemistry score of LW piglets being significantly higher than that of LC piglets (P < 0.001). The results of 16S rRNA sequencing showed differences in microbial diversity and community composition in the intestine of piglets with different breeds between PEDV infection piglets and the healthy controls. There were differences in the species and number of dominant phyla and dominant genera in the same intestinal segment. The relative abundance of Shigella in the jejunum of LC piglets after PEDV infection was significantly lower than that of LW piglets (P < 0.05). The key microorganisms differed in the microbiota were Streptococcus alactolyticus, Roseburia faecis, Lactobacillus iners, Streptococcus equi, and Lactobacillus mucosae (P < 0.05). The non-targeted metabolite analysis revealed that intestinal metabolites showed great differences among the different breeds related to infection. Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to examine any links between the microbiota and metabolites. The metabolites in the intestine of different breeds related to infection were mainly involved in arginine biosynthesis, synaptic vesicle cycle, nicotinic acid and nicotinamide metabolism and mTOR signaling pathway, with significantly positive or negative correlations (P < 0.05) between the various microorganisms. This study provides a theoretical foundation for investigating the application of core microorganisms in the gut of piglets of different breeds in the digestive tracts of those infected with PEDV, and helps to tackle the antimicrobial resistance problem further.

Introduction

Diarrhea has long been a worldwide issue in piglet farming. Piglet diarrhea is caused by various factors, including nutrition and infectious agents. Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is a leading cause of intestinal damage in piglets, causing watery diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, and even death (Li et al., 2012; Sun et al., 2012; Song et al., 2015). The relationships between intestinal microbial dysbiosis and diseases have recently attracted the public’s interest. A growing body of research suggests that bacteria significantly influence gut barrier integrity (Mazmanian et al., 2005; Kamada et al., 2012; Manichanh et al., 2012). The intestinal microbiota of piglets is a complex system that constantly changes. Recent studies have linked intestinal barrier damage in diarrhea piglets to gut microbiota disorders (Kongsted et al., 2013; Hermann-Bank et al., 2015).

There were significant differences in the number and species of intestinal microbiota in diarrhea piglets compared to healthy piglets. In PEDV-infected piglets, the abundance of Fusobacterium and Veillonella increased in the intestinal microbiota (Koh et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2019). A recent study about Landrace-Yorkshire piglets infected with PEDV reported that the abundance of Escherichia-shigella was higher in infected piglets than in uninfected piglets, whereas the abundance of Lactobacillus was lower in the infected piglets (Dong et al., 2021). Another earlier study on gut microbiota in Duroc × Landrace × Large White piglets infected with PEDV showed that infection decreased the abundance of Shigella and increased the abundance of Lactobacillus (Wu et al., 2020). Scholars have provided a great deal of research regarding the relationship between intestinal microbiota and different diseases in recent years (Lindberg, 2014; H. Yang et al., 2018). Diet and environment also have a noticeable effect on the composition of swine intestinal microbiota (Haenen et al., 2013; Gresse et al., 2017). Additionally, differences in the types of intestinal microorganisms may exist between swine breeds or geographical locations (L. Yang et al., 2014; Cheng et al., 2018; Xiao et al., 2018).

Many studies have shown that certain microbiota members in mammal digestive tracts can help treat gastrointestinal problems. Others have used these members to treat inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and other diseases that can reduce the need for antibiotics and other medications (Amit-Romach et al., 2008; Gkouskou et al., 2014; Tomasello, 2014; Imperatore et al., 2017). Early weaning of piglets could significantly shorten the animal husbandry cycle in current livestock. Nonetheless, its stress frequently results in diarrhea, and newly introduced commercial piglets are more susceptible to intestinal stress than indigenous breeds. Increases in morbidity, mortality and economic cost can result from early weaning (Gresse et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019).

The Luchuan (LC) pig is a Chinese domestic breed with small body size, good maternal and reproductive performance, and high-quality meat (Ran et al., 2014). Since antibiotics have been explicitly banned in the EU livestock industry, finding alternatives to antibiotic treatment was essential to address intestinal stress in piglets. Therefore, this study investigated the changes of intestinal microorganisms and metabolites in LC and Largewhite (LW) piglets related to PEDV artificial infection. Meanwhile, microorganisms and metabolites related to infection in different breeds of piglets were screened, and correlations were searched to help find suitable probiotics that would provide treatments for piglet diarrhea caused by PEDV.

Materials and methods

Experimental design

Two sows (Sus scrofa domestica) with the same farrowing date were chosen at a small pig farm in Guangxi province. One was a LW sow, while the other was a LC sow, a local breed unique to Guangxi province. On farrowing day, 12 piglets with an initial average body weight of 1.28 ± 0.03 kg were chosen at random, six for each group, and gender was balanced in the various groups. The umbilical cord of each piglet was trimmed and the navel disinfected with iodine. The piglets did not consume any colostrum or antibiotics and after determining good health were transferred to an experimental animal house where they were allocated into groups according to breed differences. The 12 piglets were divided into four groups (n = 3): LW piglets challenged with PEDV (PEDV LW group), LC piglets challenged with PEDV (PEDV LC group), LW piglets control (Control LW group), and LC piglets control (Control LC group). Three-day old piglets were gavaged with 2 ml of PEDV at a titer of 103 TCID50. PEDV strain JS-13 used in this work was provided by Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The virulence of the PEDV strain was evaluated in the preliminary intracellular growth assay. The dose of challenge estimates for animal experiments were based on prior animal vivo assays within the laboratory for determination of the optimum infective dose. The control LW and control LC groups were left unchallenged. Clinical signs such as diarrhea score and fecal shedding were monitored daily following the challenge. Before and after the challenge, feces swabs were collected from each pig at 12 h before the challenge and 12, 24, 44, 63, 84, and 96 h after the challenge until the end of the study. All feces swabs were stored in centrifuge tubes and frozen immediately on ice until transferred to −80°C storage. After the last piglet in the PEDV group died, six piglets in the control group were euthanized.

Determination of viral loads by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers and probes were designed using Primer 5 software to amplify the M gene from PEDV (Table 1). Primers were used to amplify the M fragment using synthesized cDNA extracted from PEDV positive materials as a template. The amplified products were separated using agarose gel electrophoresis, and the target fragments were cut out and purified under UV light. The purified product was ligated with pGEM-T for 2 h at 16°C before being transformed into E. coli DH5α competent cells. A single colony was chosen from the plate and placed in LB broth medium. After overnight incubation (37°C for 4 h), plasmids were extracted from positive clones using Thermo Scientific GeneJET Plasmid Miniprep Kit, identified by PCR, and sequenced.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Primers for porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) detection.

A spectrophotometer was used to determine the concentration and purity of the extracted plasmid and the gene copy number. A standard plasmid was used as a template, a 10-fold gradient dilution was performed, and three repeats of each plasmid concentration were made. Simultaneously, fecal samples and a negative control were run, and the reaction was carried out on a Roche fluorescence quantitative PCR. The reaction system was 20 μL, including ddH2O 7.6 μL, 2 × Ace qPCR Probe Master Mix10 μL, primer PEDV-F 0.4 μL, primer PEDV-R 0.4 μL, probe 0.2 μL, 50 × ROX Reference Dye1 0.4 μL, template 1 μL. The reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C, 5 min, 95°C, 10 s, 60°C, 30 s, 40 cycles. The fluorescence signal was collected during extension, and the kinetic and standard curves were obtained.

Histological observation and immunohistochemistry

Following inoculation, piglets from the control group were sacrificed on day 7, at which point all piglets in the infected groups had died of diarrhea. Their intestines were quickly removed after they died. Intestinal sections from the middle jejunum and cecum were collected and immediately fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 24 h. The tissues were removed from the formalin solution and dehydrated in graded alcohol solutions before being embedded in paraffin. The embedded-paraffin tissue samples were then cut into 4 μm sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed with monoclonal antibody against PEDV-N protein on these samples as described previously (Curry et al., 2017a). The villus height (VH) and crypt depth (CD) of jejunum were performed using Image J software at × 100 magnification.

DNA extraction and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing

Jejunal and cecal content samples used in microbiota analysis came from 12 piglets, as shown in Table 2. Total DNA was extracted from the jejunal and cecal contents in sterile centrifuge tubes using QIAmp DNA kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene were amplified using the primers 338F-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG and 806R-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT. According to the manufacturer’s protocol, the PCR products were confirmed on a 2% agarose gel, purified using an AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit AP-GX-250 (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, United States), and quantified using QuantiFluorTM-ST (Promega, Madison, WI, United States). PCR-purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar amounts and paired-end sequenced (2 × 300 bp) on the Illumina NovaSeq platform, according to standard protocols from Shanghai Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd., (Shanghai, China) (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States). This study’s 16S rRNA gene sequence data were deposited in the GenBank Sequence Read Archive database under SRA: SRP346825.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The information of samples collected for microbiota analysis.

Untargeted metabolomic analysis

After dissection, the jejunal and cecal tissues (Table 3) were quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen. The tissue was then cut on dry ice (10 mg) and placed in a microcentrifuge tube (2 mL). The tissue samples with 200 μL of sterile H2O were homogenized using the Benchmark Beadbug homogenizer (Benchmark Scientific, United States). 800 μL of methanol/acetonitrile (1:1, v/v) was added to the homogenized solution for metabolite extraction. The mixture was centrifuged for 15 min (4°C, 14,000 × g). The supernatant was dried in a vacuum centrifuge. The samples were re-dissolved in 100 μL of acetonitrile/water (1:1, v/v) solution for LC-MS analysis. Analyses were performed using a UHPLC (1290 Infinity LC, Agilent Technologies) coupled to a quadrupole time-of-flight (AB Sciex TripleTOF 6600) at Shanghai Applied Protein Technology Co., Ltd.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. The information of samples collected for microbiota analysis.

Statistical analysis

T-tests and one-way analyses of SPSS software 19.0 were used to compare between-group differences and groups (SPSS, Inc.). **P < 0.01 or ΔΔP < 0.01 was considered extremely significant, while *P < 0.05 or ΔP < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Differences in clinical indicators after porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection in piglets

Within 12 h of receiving PEDV orally, some piglets in the infected group had feces with a watery appearance and a fishy odor. Some even displayed symptoms, such as vomiting and difficulty breathing. The first piglet that showed symptoms, which belonged to the PEDV LW group, died within 24 h of infection. Then, within 24∼96 h, both infected piglets in the PEDV LC and PEDV LW groups died. Each piglet was scored and averaged daily by observing fecal morphology, color, and bleeding (Table 4). The results showed that the piglets in the PEDV LC group had lower diarrhea scores and survived longer than the piglets in the PEDV LW group (Figures 1A,B). The plasmid standards amplification plot of Ct vs. log concentration was used to generate a standard curve (slope = −3.2782). After fitting the data to the standard curve, the fecal viral load values measured in the infected groups were shown in Table 5. The fecal gene copy number content was lower in the PEDV LC group than in the PEDV LW group. However, the difference was insignificant.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Fecal grading.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. (A) Diarrhea score of piglets. (B) Survival time of piglets. (C) Piglet autopsy lesions. (D) Intestinal H&E staining (100 μm). (E) Immunohistochemical staining (100 μm). (F) Immunohistochemistry scoring criteria. (G) Immunohistochemistry score.

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Mortality and viral load of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in feces.

Histological and pathological differences in piglets infected with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus

Piglets from the two infected groups had different degrees of partial swelling of the small intestine, transparency of tissue of the intestinal wall, narrowing of the intestinal lumen, and individual blood spots after their abdominal cavities were dissected for visual inspection (Figure 1C). Tissue sections stained with H&E revealed that all piglets in the infected group had intestinal histopathological changes. The small intestinal villi in the jejunal section were damaged and lysed, and the cytoplasm appeared vacuolated. The jejunum epithelial cells were necrotic and detached, showing evidence of cell necrosis in the lamina propria. Furthermore, the cecal lesions were characterized primarily by dilated blood vessels, the indistinguishable structure of the large intestinal glands, and the disintegration and shedding of many intestinal gland cells. There were also a few lymphocytes in the cecum submucosal layer (Figure 1D). Piglets from infected groups had decreased VH to CD ratio in the jejunum (P < 0.05), lower VH, and tented to have decreased CD compared with the control group (Table 6).

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. Effects of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on jejunal morphology of piglets.

The distribution of PEDV in the intestine was characterized by immunohistochemical staining, which showed the presence of viral antigens in both the jejunum and cecum of the experimental group (Figure 1E). Viral antigens were mainly present in the cytoplasm and lamina propria of the jejunal villous epithelium. A small number of antigens were also present in the intestinal glands of the cecum. Immunohistochemical scoring of intestinal tissue sections using Image J software according to the scoring criteria in Figure 1F showed differences in the distribution of PEDV N protein antigens in the jejunum and cecum between the PEDV LC and PEDV LW groups (Figure 1G). Also, there were significantly higher immunohistochemical scores in the jejunum of the PEDV LW group than in the PEDV LC group (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the PEDV LW group had more severe intestinal histopathology than the PEDV LC group and contained more antigens, as evidenced by H&E and IHC scores.

Characterization of the intestinal microbiota composition of piglets after exposure to porcine epidemic diarrhea virus

After filtering and denoising, 1,712,473 sequence reads remained out of 1,934,068 raw sequences obtained from 24 samples (including 12 jejunal and 12 cecal content samples). On average, the sequence reads were 427 bp (16–441 bp). The average number of OTUs identified after species-specific taxonomic annotations were 499 OTUs, including 232 phyla, 81 classes, 154 orders, 850 families, 2,145 genera, 3,125 species and one unclassified species.

The alpha diversity results revealed a significant difference between the PEDV LC and PEDV LW groups using the Chao1, Faith’s PD, Observed species, Shannon and Simpson index in the jejunum and cecum (Figures 2A,B). Compared to the control LC group, the Chao1 and Observed species index in the cecum showed a statistically significant decrease in the control LW group (Figure 2B). The results of the flattened sparse curve show that the number of samples required for 16S rRNA analysis was achieved (Figure 2C).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. (A) Microbial alpha diversity in the jejunum. (B) Microbial alpha diversity in the cecum. (C) Rarefaction curves of alpha diversity. (D) OTU venn diagram. (E) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of intestinal microorganisms in piglets exposed to porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) infection.

According to the Venn diagram, PEDV infection decreased the number of OTUs in the jejunum and cecum of piglets from 4,724 to 3,241. Interestingly, the number of species-specific OTUs in the intestines of LC piglets was always higher than that of LW piglets whether infected with PEDV or not (Figure 2D). Furthermore, the differences in microbial community composition between the two breeds were investigated using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on the Bray-Curtis metric. Overall, the LC and LW piglet groups were split into two distinct communities clustered together (Figure 2E).

Screening for species with intestinal differences in piglets of different breeds exposed to porcine epidemic diarrhea virus

Differences in species composition between groups at the phylum and genus levels were described. Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were the most abundant phyla in the jejunal and cecal communities, followed by Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Fusobacteria (Figure 3A). PEDV infection caused a decrease in the ratio of Firmicutes to Proteobacteria in the jejunum and cecum, with the percentage of Firmicutes to Proteobacteria in the jejunum of the control LC group being significantly higher than in the other groups (Figure 3B). At the genus level, the abundance of Lactobacillus in the jejunum and cecum showed a decreasing trend after infection with PEDV, with the abundance of Shigella and Streptococcus showed an increasing trend. Notably, the relative abundance of Lactobacillus was consistently higher in LC piglets than in LW piglets whether infected with PEDV or not. In comparison, the relative abundance of Shigella was consistently lower in LC piglets than in LW piglets (Figure 3C). Furthermore, Welch’s t-test results showed that the relative abundance of Shigella was significantly higher in the PEDV LW group than in the PEDV LC group (Figure 3D).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. (A) Phylum-level species composition. (B) Ratio of firmicutes and proteobacteria. (C) Genus-level species composition. (D) Differences between groups at the genus level. (E) LDA values of linear discriminant effect size (LEfSe) analysis. (F) Intergroup differences at the species level.

Linear discriminant Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis with LDA scores > 2.0 was used to screen the bacteria further to identify microbial differences above the genus level exposed to PEDV infection (Figure 3E). Gemellales, Synergistales, and Roseburia were significantly different between groups (LDA > 2, P < 0.05). Faecalibacterium was significantly enriched in the cecum of the Con_LC group (LDA > 2, P < 0.05). Different microorganisms between subgroups were compared two-by-two and identified species levels using Metastats analysis (Figure 3F). A total of five significantly different species were obtained after performing the Welch’s t-test, Streptococcus alactolyticus, Roseburia faecis, Lactobacillus iners, Streptococcus equi, and Lactobacillus mucosae (P < 0.05). Lactobacillus iners was the dominant bacterium significantly enriched in the cecum of pre-infected piglets (Con LC group). In contrast, the remaining four different species were significantly increased in the jejunum and cecum of PEDV-infected piglets (P < 0.05).

Metabolite changes caused by exposure to porcine epidemic diarrhea virus

To better understand the metabolite changes in the intestine of piglets of different breeds exposed to PEDV infection, all metabolites in the samples were identified by the UHPLC-MS platform. The results showed that 552 metabolites were identified, with 13 main categories according to their chemical classification. The top three categories were organic acids and derivatives (17.21%), lipids and lipid-like molecules (10.688%) and organic oxygen compounds (9.058%) (Figure 4A).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. (A) Chemical classification of metabolite composition. (B) Fold change analysis of different metabolites.

Supervised multivariate analyses were performed to show differences between groups by using principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). PCA plots showed significant separation between sample groups and overlap of QC samples (Supplementary Figure 1A). OPLS-DA score plots showed substantial differences in intestinal metabolic profiles of piglets exposed to PEDV infection, and significant separation of intestinal metabolites occurred between LC and LW piglets with or without PEDV infection (Supplementary Figure 1B). The evaluation parameters R2Y and Q2 of the permutation test showed good stability in all OPLS-DA models (Supplementary Figure 1C).

The OPLS-DA model’s Variable Importance for Projection (VIP) values were used to identify the metabolites that contributed significantly to the model. As a result, 101 different metabolites were identified in jejunal and cecal samples using the OPLS-DA VIP > 1 and P < 0.05 criteria. The differential metabolite expression between groups was calculated using differential multiplicity analysis and visualized with histograms, and fold change (FC) values (FC > 1 for upward adjustment, FC < 1 for downward adjustment) that could be used as criteria for metabolite up-and down-regulation (Figure 4B). Of the 70 different metabolites identified in the jejunal samples, 28 were up-regulated, and 42 were down-regulated (Supplementary Table 1). 19 of the 31 different metabolites were significantly up-regulated, and 12 were significantly down-regulated in the cecum samples (Supplementary Table 2). All the different metabolites were matched against the KEGG database to obtain information on higher metabolite enrichment pathways (Figures 5A,B). In the jejunal content samples, certain metabolites were mainly associated with arginine and proline metabolism, arginine biosynthesis, mineral absorption, and vitamin B6 metabolism (Table 7, P < 0.05). Certain metabolites in cecum content samples were mainly enriched in the synaptic vesicle cycle, nicotinic acid and nicotinamide metabolism, and the mTOR signaling pathway (Table 8, P < 0.05).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. (A) KEGG enrichment pathway of different metabolites in jejunum. (B) KEGG enrichment pathway of different metabolites in cecum. (C) Spearman correlation analysis of different microorganisms and metabolites in the jejunum. (D) Spearman correlation analysis of different microorganisms and metabolites in the cecum.

TABLE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Table 7. Significant enrichment pathways for jejunal differential metabolites.

TABLE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Table 8. Significant enrichment pathways for differential metabolites in the cecum.

Correlation between intestinal microbiota and metabolites that differ significantly

Spearman correlation analysis revealed a significant association between different intestinal microbiota and different metabolites in breeds of piglets infected with the PEDV or not (Figure 5). S. alactolyticus was negatively correlated with Pyridoxine, 1-Oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, Creatinine, 1-Palmitoyllysophosphatidylcholine, 16-Hydroxypalmitic acid, N-Acetyl-DL-methionine, Phe-Gly and Oxyquinoline while positively correlated with DL-2-Phosphoglycerate, Taurine, gamma-L-Glutamyl-L-glutamic acid, L-Citrulline, 2-Oleoyl-1-stearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoserine and Gly-Glu. R. faecis was negatively correlated with L-Pyroglutamic acid and 1-Aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid while positively correlated with N1-Methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide, Indoxyl sulfate, L-Carnosine and Urea. S. equi was positively correlated with L-Gulonic gamma-lactone, while L. mucosae was positively correlated with 1-Methylnicotinamide.

Discussion

Characteristics of intestinal microbiota in pigs of various breeds were different in terms of features and composition. In a study completed recently, scientists found that the beta diversity of gut microbes was different between Jinhua (Chinese panda pigs) and commercial pigs (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire) (Curry et al., 2017b). Another recent study discovered similar differences in the intestinal microbiota composition between Duroc and Iberian pigs (López-García et al., 2021). The study of native Chinese pigs is ongoing. However, there are no reports on the characteristics of intestinal microbiota and metabolites in LC pigs. Some studies have reported that PEDV infection modified porcine gut microbial composition (Tan et al., 2019). Therefore, this study first compared the intestinal microbiota and gut metabolites between PEDV-infected and uninfected LC and LW pigs to understand their compositions and relationships further.

This study showed symptoms consistent with acute PEDV infection, such as lethargy and diarrhea, in as little as 6 h. After a while, the symptoms worsened with vomiting, dehydration and watery diarrhea. The first piglets died within 24 h, with the earliest fecal shedding occurring within 12 to 24 h after exposure to PEDV infection at the onset of symptoms. The histopathological findings revealed intestinal villi atrophy, severe damage to the villi, and epithelial cell exfoliation. Villous epithelial cells had brown PEDV antigen signals in their cytoplasm (Jung et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2020). The findings of these studies agreed with the observations of disease symptoms in this study. The IHC score and survival time of the LC piglet group were slightly different from those of the LW group in our results, but the differences were not significant due to the small sample size or the younger piglet age.

The present study evaluated the LC and LW piglets’ intestinal microbiota displayed different bacterial community characteristics, as evaluated by alpha diversity and PCoA analysis. We found higher species richness of cecum in the LC group than in the LW group (Chao1 index and Observed species). These data revealed microbial community diversity and complexity in different piglets gut systems. Besides, differences were found in the dominant phylum, and dominant bacterial genus in the same intestine of piglets in the LC and LW groups, and the cecum of piglets of the same breed was always richer in bacterial species than the jejunum, regardless of whether they were infected with PEDV or not. Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were the dominant phyla with relative abundance greater than 1% in the jejunum of piglets whether infected with the PEDV or not, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria and Fusobacteria increased in the number of dominant phyla in the cecum. Three dominant genera (Lactobacillus, Shigella, Streptococcus and Actinobacillus) with relative abundance greater than 5% were identified in the jejunum. The number of dominant genera with relative abundance greater than 5% in the cecum increased to eight (Lactobacillus, Shigella, Streptococcus, Shigella, Streptococcus, Campylobacter, Bacteroides, and Bifidobacterium). Previous studies had shown high microbial diversity in the large intestinal segment, with no microorganisms in abundance above 8% at the genus level and a more complex microbial composition in the distal intestinal part than in the proximal one, which was similar to the results of this study (Martinez-Guryn et al., 2019).

The abundance of species composition showed significant differences between the control and the PEDV infected piglets. Significant changes in the microbiota composition at the genus level were found in the jejunum and cecum. The Con LC and the PEDV LC groups displayed a higher abundance of Lactobacillus and a lower abundance of Shigella than the Con LW and the PEDV LW groups in the jejunum and cecum. Many studies suggest that Lactobacillus sp. helps to reduce pro-inflammatory cytokine production and enhance the antiviral immune response (Waki et al., 2014; Niederwerder, 2017). Shigella sp. has been shown to be a common cause of bacterial deaths, and most cases present with watery diarrhea and dysentery (MacLennan and Steele, 2022). Fusobacterium and Shigella abundances increased significantly after PEDV infection, while Psychrobacter, Prevotella, and Faecalibacterium abundances decreased significantly. Others have previously made a similar observation (Afra et al., 2013; Croxen et al., 2013). Because these symbiotic bacteria were known to play an important role in maintaining homeostasis, their reduction in the control group may negatively impact them (Koh et al., 2015). PEDV infection reduced probiotics and increased pathogenic bacteria, disrupting the intestinal microbiota structure (Song et al., 2017; Huang et al., 2019). These results suggest that PEDV infection caused profound alterations in piglets’ gut microbiota composition. However, the gut microbiome composition of LC pigs was significantly different from that of LW piglets, especially in the trend of changes in the microbiome composition of PEDV LC groups.

In this study, the critical microorganisms screened for differences in microbiota structure before and after infection in different breeds of piglets were Streptococcus alactolyticus, Roseburia faecis, Lactobacillus iners, Streptococcus equi and Lactobacillus mucosae. The significantly different microorganism R. faecis, belonging to the genus Roseburia, a butyric acid-producing bacterium, was identified in this experiment (Duncan et al., 2006), The increased content of acetic and volatile fatty acids in the cecum was beneficial for improving intestinal function and health (Duncan et al., 2006). L. mucosae was first isolated from the small intestine of pigs and was an anaerobic bacterium that ferments whey to metabolize L-lactate (Guerra et al., 2001). It is not clear whether the microorganisms screened for differences between groups are related to the process of PEDV infection in the host. To help clarify this, their mechanisms of action need to be further explored and elucidated. In this experiment, the metabolite 1-Methylnicotinamide that positively correlated with L. mucosae was upregulated in the cecum of the PEDV_LW group, indicating that the expression of this metabolite may be associated with the increased abundance of L. mucosae. L. mucosae belong to the family Lactobacillaceae and play an important role in gastrointestinal health (Walter, 2008; Delgado et al., 2015), was first identified by Roos et al. (2000), with probiotic properties, high viability, acid, and bile tolerance (de Palencia et al., 2011). L. mucosae LM1 had affinities for mucin glycan receptor analogs against pathogens such as Escherichia coli K88 and Salmonella Typhimurium KCCM 40253. This activity was demonstrated in vitro (Valeriano et al., 2014, 2016). 1-Methylnicotinamide was the active endogenous metabolite of nicotinamide (Alston and Abeles, 1988), involved in the nicotinic acid and nicotinamide metabolic pathways, possessed with anti-inflammatory characteristics (Gebicki et al., 2003; Bryniarski et al., 2008), and protective characteristics benefitting the gastrointestinal tract (Brzozowski et al., 2008). The specific relationship between 1-Methylnicotinamide and L. mucosae and whether both played a key role in the anti-PEDV infection process needs further experimental validation.

The differences in gut microbes and metabolites between the two piglet breeds observed in our study may be related to differences in the disease symptoms following PEDV infection. However, it is important to determine if there is a connection between the specific core microbiota found in LC piglets (microbiota that stays in the body with infection) and the PEDV infection process. One limitation of this study is the relatively small sample size. Future studies with a large sample size are desired to validate the discoveries in this study.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.

Ethics statement

This animal study was reviewed and approved by Animal Protection and Ethics Committee and Use Committee of Foshan University.

Author contributions

WeZ, YZ, WaZ, and ZL designed the study. ZH, LM, and LS performed the research and analyzed the data. WaZ wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. JG, FW, KM, SE-A, SH, and ZL revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the Project in Key Fields of Guangdong Province (Grant Nos. 2022B0202090002 and 2022B0202090003) and the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2019A1515110785).

Conflict of interest

Author WeZ was employed by Guangxi Yangxiang Co., Ltd.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.990642/full#supplementary-material

References

Afra, K., Laupland, K., Leal, J., Lloyd, T., and Gregson, D. (2013). Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of Fusobacterium species bacteremia. BMC Infect. Dis. 13:264. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-264

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alston, T. A., and Abeles, R. H. (1988). Substrate specificity of nicotinamide methyltransferase isolated from porcine liver. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 260, 601–608. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(88)90487-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Amit-Romach, E., Uni, Z., and Reifen, R. (2008). Therapeutic Potential of Two Probiotics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease as observed in the Trinitrobenzene Sulfonic Acid Model of Colitis. Dis. Colon Rectum 51, 1828–1836. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9394-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bryniarski, K., Biedron, R., Jakubowski, A., Chlopicki, S., and Marcinkiewicz, J. (2008). Anti-inflammatory effect of 1-methylnicotinamide in contact hypersensitivity to oxazolone in mice; involvement of prostacyclin. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 578, 332–338. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.09.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brzozowski, T., Konturek, P. C., Chlopicki, S., Sliwowski, Z., Pawlik, M., Ptak-Belowska, A., et al. (2008). Therapeutic Potential of 1-Methylnicotinamide against Acute Gastric Lesions Induced by Stress: Role of Endogenous Prostacyclin and Sensory Nerves. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 326, 105–116. doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.136457

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, P., Wang, Y., Liang, J., Wu, Y., Wright, A., and Liao, X. (2018). Exploratory Analysis of the Microbiological Potential for Efficient Utilization of Fiber Between Lantang and Duroc Pigs. Front. Microbiol. 9:1342. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01342

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Croxen, M. A., Law, R. J., Scholz, R., Keeney, K. M., Wlodarska, M., and Finlay, B. B. (2013). Recent Advances in Understanding Enteric Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 26, 822–880. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00022-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Curry, S. M., Schwartz, K. J., Yoon, K. J., Gabler, N. K., and Burrough, E. R. (2017a). Effects of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection on nursery pig intestinal function and barrier integrity. Vet. Microbiol. 211, 58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.09.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Curry, S. M., Schwartz, K. J., Yoon, K. J., Gabler, N. K., and Burrough, E. R. (2017b). Effects of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection on nursery pig intestinal function and barrier integrity. Vet. Microbiol. 211, 58–66.

Google Scholar

de Palencia, P. F., Fernaìndez, M., Mohedano, M. L., Ladero, V., Quevedo, C., Alvarez, M. A., et al. (2011). Role of Tyramine Synthesis by Food-Borne Enterococcus durans in Adaptation to the Gastrointestinal Tract Environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 699–702. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01411-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Delgado, S., Leite, A. M. O., Ruas-Madiedo, P., and Mayo, B. (2015). Probiotic and technological properties of Lactobacillus spp. strains from the human stomach in the search for potential candidates against gastric microbial dysbiosis. Front. Microbiol. 5:766. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00766

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, W., Ding, N., Zhang, Y., Tan, Z., Ding, X., Zhang, Q., et al. (2021). Alterations of Suckling Piglet Jejunal Microbiota Due to Infection With Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus and Protection Against Infection by Lactobacillus salivarius. Front. Vet. Sci. 8:771411. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.771411

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duncan, S. H., Aminov, R. I., Scott, K. P., Louis, P., Stanton, T. B., and Flint, H. J. (2006). Proposal of Roseburia faecis sp. nov., Roseburia hominis sp. nov. and Roseburia inulinivorans sp. nov., based on isolates from human faeces. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56, 2437–2441. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64098-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gebicki, J., Sysa-Jedrzejowska, A., Adamus, J., Woźniacka, A., Rybak, M., and Zielonka, J. (2003). 1-Methylnicotinamide: A potent anti-inflammatory agent of vitamin origin. Pol. J. Pharmacol. 55, 109–112.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Gkouskou, K. K., Deligianni, C., Tsatsanis, C., and Eliopoulos, A. G. (2014). The gut microbiota in mouse models of inflammatory bowel disease. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 4:28. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gresse, R., Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Fleury, M. A., de Wiele, T., van, Forano, E., et al. (2017). Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Postweaning Piglets: Understanding the Keys to Health. Trends Microbiol. 25, 851–873. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guerra, N. P., Rua, M. L., and Pastrana, L. (2001). Nutritional factors affecting the production of two bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria on whey. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 70, 267–281. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00551-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haenen, D., Zhang, J., da Silva, C. S., Bosch, G., van der Meer, I. M., van Arkel, J., et al. (2013). A Diet High in Resistant Starch Modulates Microbiota Composition, SCFA Concentrations, and Gene Expression in Pig Intestine. J. Nutr. 143, 274–283. doi: 10.3945/jn.112.169672

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hermann-Bank, M. L., Skovgaard, K., Stockmarr, A., Strube, M. L., Larsen, N., Kongsted, H., et al. (2015). Characterization of the bacterial gut microbiota of piglets suffering from new neonatal porcine diarrhoea. BMC Vet. Res. 11:139. doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0419-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, A., Cai, R., Wang, Q., Shi, L., Li, C., and Yan, H. (2019). Dynamic Change of Gut Microbiota During Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Infection in Suckling Piglets. Front. Microbiol. 10:322. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00322

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Imperatore, N., Tortora, R., Morisco, F., and Caporaso, N. (2017). Gut microbiota and functional diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. Minerva Gastroenterol. 63, 355–372. doi: 10.23736/S1121-421X.16.02336-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jung, K., Annamalai, T., Lu, Z., and Saif, L. J. (2015). Comparative pathogenesis of US porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) strain PC21A in conventional 9-day-old nursing piglets vs. 26-day-old weaned pigs. Vet. Microbiol. 178, 31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.04.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kamada, N., Kim, Y.-G., Sham, H. P., Vallance, B. A., Puente, J. L., Martens, E. C., et al. (2012). Regulated Virulence Controls the Ability of a Pathogen to Compete with the Gut Microbiota. Science 336, 1325–1329. doi: 10.1126/science.1222195

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koh, H.-W., Kim, M. S., Lee, J.-S., Kim, H., and Park, S.-J. (2015). Changes in the Swine Gut Microbiota in Response to Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Infection. Microbes Environ. 30, 284–287. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME15046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kongsted, H., Jonach, B., Haugegaard, S., Angen, Ø, Jorsal, S. E., Kokotovic, B., et al. (2013). Microbiological, pathological and histological findings in four Danish pig herds affected by a new neonatal diarrhoea syndrome. BMC Vet. Res. 9:206. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, W., Li, H., Liu, Y., Pan, Y., Deng, F., Song, Y., et al. (2012). New Variants of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus, China, 2011. Emerg. Infect.Dis. 18, 1350–1353. doi: 10.3201/eid1808.120002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, C.-M., Annamalai, T., Liu, X., Gao, X., Lu, Z., El-Tholoth, M., et al. (2015). Experimental infection of a US spike-insertion deletion porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in conventional nursing piglets and cross-protection to the original US PEDV infection. Vet. Res. 46:134. doi: 10.1186/s13567-015-0278-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lindberg, J. E. (2014). Fiber effects in nutrition and gut health in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 5:15. doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-5-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, S., Zhao, L., Zhai, Z., Zhao, W., Ding, J., Dai, R., et al. (2015). Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Infection Induced the Unbalance of Gut Microbiota in Piglets. Curr. Microbiol. 71, 643–649. doi: 10.1007/s00284-015-0895-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

López-García, A., Benítez, R., Núñez, Y., Gómez-Izquierdo, E., de Mercado, E., and García-Casco, J. M. (2021). Influence of genetic background and dietary oleic acid on gut microbiota composition in Duroc and Iberian pigs. PLoS One 16:e0251804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251804

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

MacLennan, C. A., and Steele, A. D. (2022). Frontiers in Shigella Vaccine Development. Vaccines 10:1536. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10091536

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manichanh, C., Borruel, N., Casellas, F., and Guarner, F. (2012). The gut microbiota in IBD. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 9, 599–608. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martinez-Guryn, K., Leone, V., and Chang, E. B. (2019). Regional Diversity of the Gastrointestinal Microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 26, 314–324. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.08.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mazmanian, S. K., Liu, C. H., Tzianabos, A. O., and Kasper, D. L. (2005). An Immunomodulatory Molecule of Symbiotic Bacteria Directs Maturation of the Host Immune System. Cell 122, 107–118. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Niederwerder, M. C. (2017). Role of the microbiome in swine respiratory disease. Vet. Microbiol. 209, 97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.02.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ran, M.-L., He, J., Tan, J., Yang, A.-Q., Li, Z., and Chen, B. (2014). The complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Luchuan pig (Sus scrofa). Mitochondrial DNA 27, 1880–1881. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2014.971269

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roos, S., Karner, F., Axelsson, L., and Jonsson, H. (2000). Lactobacillus mucosae sp. nov., a new species with in vitro mucus-binding activity isolated from pig intestine. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50, 251–258. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-1-251

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, D., Moon, H., and Kang, B. (2015). Porcine epidemic diarrhea: A review of current epidemiology and available vaccines. Clin. Exp. Vaccine Res. 4:166. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2015.4.2.166

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, D., Peng, Q., Chen, Y., Zhou, X., Zhang, F., Li, A., et al. (2017). Altered Gut Microbiota Profiles in Sows and Neonatal Piglets Associated with Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Infection. Sci. Rep. 7:17439. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17830-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, R.-Q., Cai, R.-J., Chen, Y.-Q., Liang, P.-S., Chen, D.-K., and Song, C.-X. (2012). Outbreak of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea in Suckling Piglets China. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 18, 161–163. doi: 10.3201/eid1801.111259

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, Z., Dong, W., Ding, Y., Ding, X., Zhang, Q., and Jiang, L. (2019). Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Altered Colonic Microbiota Communities in Suckling Piglets. Genes 11:44. doi: 10.3390/genes11010044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tomasello, G. (2014). Dismicrobism in inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer: Changes in response of colocytes. World J. Gastroenterol. 20:18121. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i48.18121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Valeriano, V. D., Bagon, B. B., Balolong, M. P., and Kang, D.-K. (2016). Carbohydrate-binding specificities of potential probiotic Lactobacillus strains in porcine jejunal (IPEC-J2) cells and porcine mucin. J. Microbiol. 54, 510–519. doi: 10.1007/s12275-016-6168-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Valeriano, V. D., Parungao-Balolong, M. M., and Kang, D.-K. (2014). In vitro evaluation of the mucin-adhesion ability and probiotic potential of Lactobacillus mucosae LM1. J. Appl. Microbiol. 117, 485–497. doi: 10.1111/jam.12539

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Waki, N., Yajima, N., Suganuma, H., Buddle, B. M., Luo, D., Heiser, A., et al. (2014). Oral administration of Lactobacillus brevis KB290 to mice alleviates clinical symptoms following influenza virus infection. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 58, 87–93. doi: 10.1111/lam.12160

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Walter, J. (2008). Ecological Role of Lactobacilli in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Implications for Fundamental and Biomedical Research. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 4985–4996. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00753-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, T., Teng, K., Liu, Y., Shi, W., Zhang, J., Dong, E., et al. (2019). Lactobacillus plantarum PFM 105 Promotes Intestinal Development Through Modulation of Gut Microbiota in Weaning Piglets. Front. Microbiol. 10:90. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00090

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, T., Lyu, Y., Li, X., Wu, M., Yu, K., Li, S., et al. (2020). Impact of N-Acetylcysteine on the Gut Microbiota in the Piglets Infected With Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus. Front. Vet. Sci. 7:582338. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.582338

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, Y., Kong, F., Xiang, Y., Zhou, W., Wang, J., Yang, H., et al. (2018). Comparative biogeography of the gut microbiome between Jinhua and Landrace pigs. Sci. Rep. 8:5985. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24289-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, X., Du, L., Fan, B., Sun, B., Zhou, J., Guo, R., et al. (2020). A flagellin-adjuvanted inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) vaccine provides enhanced immune protection against PEDV challenge in piglets. Arch. Virol. 165, 1299–1309. doi: 10.1007/s00705-020-04567-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, H., Xiao, Y., Wang, J., Xiang, Y., Gong, Y., Wen, X., et al. (2018). Core gut microbiota in Jinhua pigs and its correlation with strain, farm and weaning age. J. Microbiol. 56, 346–355. doi: 10.1007/s12275-018-7486-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, L., Bian, G., Su, Y., and Zhu, W. (2014). Comparison of Faecal Microbial Community of Lantang, Bama, Erhualian, Meishan, Xiaomeishan, Duroc, Landrace, and Yorkshire Sows. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 27, 898–906. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13621

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: microbiota, metabolites, porcine epidemic diarrhea, Luchuan pig, Largewhite pig

Citation: Li Z, Zhang W, Su L, Huang Z, Zhang W, Ma L, Sun J, Guo J, Wen F, Mei K, El-Ashram S, Huang S and Zhao Y (2022) Difference analysis of intestinal microbiota and metabolites in piglets of different breeds exposed to porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection. Front. Microbiol. 13:990642. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.990642

Received: 10 July 2022; Accepted: 11 October 2022;
Published: 01 November 2022.

Edited by:

Jianmin Zhang, South China Agricultural University, China

Reviewed by:

Tongling Shan, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute (CAAS), China
Zhen Tan, Hainan University, China
Tongling Shan, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute (CAAS), China
Jiangchao Zhao, University of Arkansas, United States

Copyright © 2022 Li, Zhang, Su, Huang, Zhang, Ma, Sun, Guo, Wen, Mei, El-Ashram, Huang and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yunxiang Zhao, WXVueGlhbmdaaGFvQDEyNi5jb20=

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.