Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 29 August 2022
Sec. Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants

Functional characterization of a gamma-glutamyl phosphate reductase ProA in proline biosynthesis and promoting expression of type three secretion system in Ralstonia solanacearum

\r\nYue Guan&#x;Yue Guan1†Rongsheng Wang&#x;Rongsheng Wang2†Nan ChenNan Chen3Yalan ZhuYalan Zhu1Liangliang HanLiangliang Han1Xinping Chen,Xinping Chen1,4Jing Li*Jing Li5*Yong Zhang,Yong Zhang1,4
  • 1College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
  • 2Liaoning Key Laboratory of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China
  • 3College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing, China
  • 4Interdisciplinary Research Center for Agriculture Green Development in Yangtze River Basin, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
  • 5The Ninth People’s Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China

Ralstonia solanacearum RSc2741 has been predicted as a gamma-glutamyl phosphate reductase ProA catalyzing the second reaction of proline formation from glutamate. Here, we experimentally demonstrated that proA mutants were proline auxotrophs that failed to grow in a minimal medium, and supplementary proline, but not glutamate, fully restored the diminished growth, confirming that ProA is responsible for the biosynthesis of proline from glutamate in R. solanacearum. ProA was previously identified as one of the candidates regulating the expression of genes for type three secretion system (T3SS), one of the essential pathogenicity determinants of R. solanacearum. Supplementary proline significantly enhanced the T3SS expression both in vitro and in planta, indicating that proline is a novel inducer of the T3SS expression. Deletion of proA substantially impaired the T3SS expression both in vitro and in planta even under proline-supplemented conditions, indicating that ProA plays additional roles apart from proline biosynthesis in promoting the expression of the T3SS genes. It was further revealed that the involvement of ProA in the T3SS expression was mediated through the pathway of PrhG-HrpB. Both the proA mutants and the wild-type strain grew in the intercellular spaces of tobacco leaves, while their ability to invade and colonize tobacco xylem vessels was substantially impaired, which was about a 1-day delay for proA mutants to successfully invade xylem vessels and was about one order of magnitude less than the wild-type strain to proliferate to the maximum densities in xylem vessels. It thus resulted in substantially impaired virulence of proA mutants toward host tobacco plants. The impaired abilities of proA mutants to invade and colonize xylem vessels were not due to possible proline insufficiency in the rhizosphere soil or inside the plants. All taken together, these results extend novel insights into the understanding of the biological function of ProA and sophisticated regulation of the T3SS and pathogenicity in R. solanacearum.

Introduction

The syringe-like type three secretion system (T3SS) is essential for the pathogenicity of many pathogenic bacteria in animals and plants, which enables productive interaction between bacteria and eukaryotic host cells by delivering virulence proteins (called type III effectors, T3Es) directly into the cytosol of host cells to usurp and subvert host defense (Cornelis, 2006; Galán and Wolf-Watz, 2006). Ralstonia solanacearum is a causal agent of bacterial wilt disease in 450 plant species worldwide, and the T3SS plays an essential role in the infection process of R. solanacearum, particularly at the early stage of invading host cells (Cunnac et al., 2004; Angot et al., 2006; Jones and Dangl, 2006). R. solanacearum is extremely heterogeneous and currently regarded as a Ralstonia solanacearum species complex (RSSC), including R. solanacearum and closely related species of R. syzygii, R. picketti, and banana blood disease (BDB) bacterium. The T3SS is greatly conserved among the RSSC, which is encoded by 22 genes arranged in a regulon, named the hypersensitive response and pathogenicity (hrp) regulon, and is responsible for a hypersensitive response in resistant plants and pathogenicity in host plants (Arlat et al., 1992; Genin and Denny, 2012; Coll and Valls, 2013).

To date, the R. solanacearum T3SS has been well demonstrated to be globally regulated by a complex network (Valls et al., 2006; Genin, 2010; Hikichi et al., 2017). In brief, the expression of the T3SS and entire T3Es genes (more than 100 T3Es in the RSSC) was directly controlled by a key regulator HrpB, an AraC-family of transcriptional regulator, which binds directly to the hrpII motif in the promoters of many target genes to control their transcription (Cunnac et al., 2004; Mukaihara et al., 2004, 2010). The expression of hrpB and the entire T3SS genes is not activated in a nutrient-rich medium until the bacterium gets in contact with host signals or some mimic signals, such as those in a nutrient-limited medium that might mimic plant apoplastic fluids to activate the T3SS expression, so-called a hrp-inducing medium (Marenda et al., 1998; Angot et al., 2006; Yoshimochi et al., 2009b). Two close paralogs HrpG and PrhG, which are OmpR/PhoB family of response regulators of the two-component system (TCS), respond to host signals or mimic signals by phosphorylation and positively regulate hrpB expression in parallel ways (Plener et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2013). Host signals or mimic signals are presumed to be recognized by the outer membrane protein PrhA and transferred to HrpG via a signaling cascade of PrhA-PrhR/PrhI-PrhJ or some unknown cascades (Genin and Denny, 2012; Hikichi et al., 2017). Although both HrpG and PrhG positively regulate hrpB expression in parallel ways, HrpG is essential for host invasion, host colonization, and pathogenicity, while PrhG contributes partially to pathogenicity and host colonization. HrpG is presumed to respond to host signals, while PrhG seems to respond to some metabolic signals (Plener et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2013; Pedro-Jove et al., 2021). In addition, a global virulence regulator PhcA, which is a LysR family of the transcriptional regulators and quorum sensing-dependent, negatively regulates hrpG expression, but positively regulates prhG expression (Genin et al., 2005; Yoshimochi et al., 2009a; Zhang et al., 2013). R. solanacearum might switch from using HrpG to PrhG for hrpB activation in a cell density-dependent manner (Zhang et al., 2013).

To further elucidate the complex regulation of the T3SS in R. solanacearum, we previously isolated some transposon mutants, in which the T3SS expression was substantially decreased in R. solanacearum strain OE1-1, a pathogenic strain of tomato and tobacco plants (Kanda et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2013). The expression profiles of the T3SS were monitored with a popA-lacZYA fusion, which exists as part of a popABC operon with popB and popC, and is mapped to the left side of the hrp regulon (Salanoubat et al., 2002). PopABC includes three T3Es, which are currently renamed as RipS (Ralstonia-injected proteins) of RipX, RipAB, and RipAC, respectively, and the expression of popABC is directly controlled by the master regulator HrpB (Peeters et al., 2013; Landry et al., 2020). The expression of popA-lacZYA exhibits similar profiles to the T3SS genes under different conditions, and this construction does not alter the infection process of OE1-1 toward different host plants (Yoshimochi et al., 2009b; Zhang et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2022). Among them is RSc2741 (426 amino acids in GMI1000, a well-studied R. solanacearum strain), which has been predicted as a gamma-glutamyl phosphate reductase ProA catalyzing the second reaction of proline formation from glutamate (Salanoubat et al., 2002; Hoffmann et al., 2017). The expression level of popA-lacZYA (the T3SS) was substantially decreased in the proA transposon mutants, indicating ProA possibly exerts a novel effect on the expression of the T3SS genes. This is the first report linking the T3SS with proline biosynthesis. We thus focused on ProA to investigate its contribution to the T3SS and pathogenicity in R. solanacearum.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

Ralstonia solanacearum strains used in this study were derivatives of R. solanacearum OE1-1 (Table 1), which is virulent in tomato and tobacco plants (Kanda et al., 2003). E. coli strains of DH12S and S17-1 were grown at 37°C in LB medium, which were used for plasmid construction and conjugational transfer, respectively. R. solanacearum strains were grown at 28°C in a nutrient-rich medium (broth medium) and a minimal medium (Hoagland medium with 2% of sucrose, used as a hrp-inducing medium) (Yoshimochi et al., 2009b).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Bacterial strains used in this study.

Mutant generation with in-frame deletion of proA

In the present study, mutants with an in-frame deletion of target genes were generated with the pK18mobsacB-based homolog recombination as described previously (Zhang et al., 2015). In brief, DNA fragments flanking both ends of target genes were conjugated with joint PCR and sub-cloned into pK18mobsacB. After validating the sequences, the plasmid was transferred into R. solanacearum strains by conjugation with E. coli S17-1. Mutants with an in-frame deletion of target genes were generated (listed in Table 1) and confirmed by colony PCR with respective primer pairs (Supplementary Table 1).

Complementation analyses

In the present study, genetic complementation was performed with the Tn7-based site-specific chromosomal integration system as described previously that is a monocopy as the chromosome and is competent to fully restore phenotypes of mutants to those of parent strains (Zhang et al., 2011, 2021). In brief, the DNA fragment containing the coding sequence and native promoter (upstream region of about 500 bp empirically harboring the native promoter) was PCR amplified and cloned into pUC18-mini-Tn7T-Gm (Choi et al., 2005). After validating the sequence, the target DNA fragment was integrated into the chromosome of corresponding mutants at 25 bp of glmS downstream with the Tn7-based site-specific chromosomal integration system as monocopy (Zhang et al., 2021). Complementary strains were confirmed by colony PCR with a primer pair of glmsdown and Tn7R (Zhang et al., 2011).

Bacterial growth assay

In the present study, a bacterial growth assay was performed both in medium (in vitro) and in tobacco leaves and tomato stems (in planta). Growth in the medium was assessed with optical densities at 600 nm (OD600). The in planta growth was represented in log10 cfu cm–2 in tobacco leaves and log10 cfu g–1 in tobacco stems, which were quantified by the dilution plating technique. L-proline and L-glutamate were purchased from Sango Biotech (Shanghai China) and supplemented into the minimal medium at a final concentration of 50 mM for the in vitro growth restoration assay. For the in planta growth assay in tobacco stems, tobacco plants were inoculated with the method of soil-soaking at a final cell density of 107 cfu g–1 soil, and cell growth in tobacco stems was daily assessed. Each assay was performed with three biological replicates, including three replicates per trial for the in vitro growth assay and more than four biological replicates including six plants per trial for the in planta growth assay. Mean values of all experiments were averaged with SD, and the statistical significance was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett test following ANOVA.

β-Galactosidase assay

The β-galactosidase assay was performed to evaluate the expression levels of lacZYA-fused target genes both in vitro and in planta as described previously (Zhang et al., 2013). For the in vitro enzyme assay, bacterial strains were cultivated in a nutrient-rich medium or hrp-inducing minimal medium to an OD600 of approximately 0.1 and subjected to the enzyme assay, and the enzymatic activities were expressed in Miller Units (Miller, 1992). The in planta enzymatic activities were assessed with the Galacto-Light Plus kit and presented with RLU cell–1 (luminescence normalized by cell number) (Zhang et al., 2011). A bacterial suspension of 0.1 OD600 (108 cfu ml–1) was infiltrated into the tobacco leaves, and bacterial cells in punched leaf disks were subjected to the in planta enzyme assay and cell counting by the dilution plating technique simultaneously. Each assay was performed with three biological replicates, including three replicates per trial for the in vitro enzyme assay and more than four biological replicates including six plants per trial for the in planta enzyme assay. Mean values of all experiments were averaged with SD, and the statistical significance was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett test following ANOVA.

Virulence assay

Virulence assay was carried out on wilt-susceptible tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum CV. Bright Yellow), which were grown for 3–4 weeks and subjected to virulence assay (Zhang et al., 2013). Briefly, tobacco plants were inoculated by methods of soil-soaking, which mimics natural invasion from rhizosphere soil into roots, and leaf infiltration, which enables direct invasion into the intercellular spaces of tobacco leaves (Zhang et al., 2013). Wilt symptoms of plants were assessed using 1–4 disease indexes, and the mean values of all experiments were averaged with SD. The virulence assay was also presented with survival curves, by which test plants were inspected daily with two levels of no wilting symptoms (disease index below 3) and completely wilted (disease index equal to or higher than 3) as previously described (Poueymiro et al., 2009). Each assay was carried out with at least four biological replicates including 12 plants per trial. The statistical significance was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett test following ANOVA.

Results

ProA is essential for proline formation from glutamate in Ralstonia solanacearum

ProA catalyzes proline formation from glutamate in many bacteria (Hoffmann et al., 2017). We assessed whether ProA controls proline biosynthesis in R. solanacearum. The proA deletion mutant RQ5735 (RK5050, ΔproA), as well as the wild-type strain (RK5050, a popA-lacZYA reporter strain in R. solanacearum OE1-1), grew in the nutrient-rich broth medium (data not shown), but failed to grow in a minimal medium (Hoagland medium with 2% sucrose, hrp-inducing minimal medium) (Figure 1A). The genetic complementation assay was performed with the Tn7-based site-specific chromosomal integration system that is competent to fully restore the changed phenotypes of mutants (Choi et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2021). Complementation of proA (RQC1485, ΔproA + C) fully restored the diminished growth of proA mutant in the minimal medium (Figure 1A), while supplementary proline (ΔproA + pro, 50 mM), but not glutamate (ΔproA + glu, 100 mM) fully restored the diminished growth of proA mutants in the minimal medium (Figure 1A), indicating that ProA controls proline formation from glutamate in R. solanacearum.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Involvement of ProA in the growth of R. solanacearum in (A) nutrient-limited sucrose medium (Hoagland medium with 2% sucrose) and (B) intercellular spaces of tobacco leaves. WT, the wild-type strain, RK5050 (OE1-1, popA-lacZYA); ΔproA, RQ5735 (RK5050, ΔproA); ΔproA + C, RQC1485 (complementary proA in RQ5735); + glu and + pro, supplemented glutamate at 100 mM or proline at 50 mM in the minimal medium, respectively. For the growth assay in medium, the cell suspension was washed two times with distilled water, adjusted to an OD600 of 1.0, and inoculated into the minimal medium with a proportion of 1%, and optical density at 600 nm (OD600) was measured periodically. Each assay was repeated with three biological replicates, including three replicates per trial. For the growth assay in tobacco leaves, which was presented in log cfu cm–2, tobacco plants were inoculated with the method of leaf infiltration, and leaf disks (0.38 cm2) were punched and subjected to daily quantification of cell number by dilution plating. The growth assay was carried out till 5 dpi, when tobacco leaves became withered and dried. Each assay was repeated with more than four biological replicates, including six replicates per trial. Mean values of all experiments were averaged and presented with SD (error bars). Statistical significance between proA mutants and the wild-type RK5050, or that between treatments with supplementation or without supplementation, was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett test following ANOVA. Significance level, ** indicates P < 0.01.

The proA mutant grew normally inside tobacco leaves

Nutrients and oxygen inside the plants were believed to be relatively limited compared to those in a nutrient-rich broth medium, while R. solanacearum can utilize some secondary metabolites inside plants as carbon sources or substrates for the respiratory chain to fulfill colonization in host plants (Zuluaga et al., 2013; Lowe-Power et al., 2018). The proA mutants grew normally in a nutrient-rich broth medium, but failed to grow in the nutrient-limited minimal medium (Figure 1A). We assessed the proliferation of proA mutants in the tobacco leaves (intercellular spaces). For the growth assay in tobacco leaves, a bacterial suspension of 104 cfu ml–1 was infiltrated into the intercellular spaces of tobacco leaves, and leaf disks were punched for daily quantification of cell densities with the dilution plating method (Zhang et al., 2015). The proA mutant RQ5735 (RK5050, ΔproA) proliferated similarly to the wild-type strain (RK5050) in tobacco leaves till 5 days post-infiltration (dpi) (Figure 1B). At this point, RK5050-infiltrated leaves became withered and dried. In consideration of the fact that proA mutants were proline auxotrophs (Figure 1A), proline in tobacco leaves might be enough for proA mutants to proliferate in planta.

ProA is important for the type three secretion system expression both in vitro and in planta

ProA was originally identified as one of the candidates that affected the expression of the T3SS in OE1-1 by transposon mutagenesis (Zhang et al., 2013). Expression of the T3SS in OE1-1 was monitored by a popA-lacZYA fusion, which exhibits similar expression profiles to the T3SS genes but did not alter the infection process of OE1-1 toward different host plants, including host invasion and colonization inside host plants (Yoshimochi et al., 2009b; Zhang et al., 2011, 2013). The expression of the T3SS is not activated in the nutrient-rich medium, but induced in a nutrient-limited medium (i.e., Hoagland medium with 2% sucrose, the so-called hrp-inducing medium) or by coming in contact with the host signals (Valls et al., 2006; Yoshimochi et al., 2009b). We first assessed whether ProA is required for the T3SS expression in an hrp-inducing medium. The proA mutants failed to grow in an hrp-inducing medium (minimal sucrose medium, Figure 1A), and proline was supplemented into this minimal sucrose medium at 50 mM to support the growth of proA mutants. Supplementary proline significantly enhanced popA expression of the wild-type strain (RK5050) in the hrp-inducing medium, which was about 1.5 fold higher than without supplementary proline (Figure 2A). Deletion of proA substantially impaired popA expression in the proline-supplemented minimal medium, in which proA mutants grew normally as the wild-type strain (Figure 2A). Complementation of proA (RQC1485, ΔproA + C) fully restored the impaired popA expression to levels of the wild-type strain (RK5050) in the proline-supplemented hrp-inducing medium (Figure 2A). HrpB plays a key regulatory role in the expression of the entire T3SS genes. We further evaluated whether ProA is required for hrpB expression in the hrp-inducing medium. Deletion of proA (RQ5935) substantially impaired hrpB expression in the proline-supplemented hrp-inducing minimal medium (Figure 2A). Complementary proA (RQC1486, ΔproA + C) fully restored the impaired hrpB expression to the levels of the parent strain RK5046 (OE1-1, hrpB-lacZYA) (Figure 2A), confirming that ProA is important for the expression of hrpB and the T3SS genes in the hrp-inducing medium.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Involvement of ProA in the expression of popA (popA-lacZYA) and hrpB (hrpB-lacZYA). The wild type (WT) refers to reporter strains of RK5050 (OE1-1, popA-lacZYA) and RK5046 (hrpB-lacZYA); ΔproA refers to deletion of proA from RK5050 (OE1-1, popA-lacZYA) and RK5046 (hrpB-lacZYA). ΔproA + C refers to complementary proA in ΔproA mutant strains; + pro, supplemented proline into tobacco leaves. (A) Expression of popA-lacZYA and hrpB-lacZYA in hrp-inducing medium (the in vitro enzyme assay) with supplementary proline (50 mM); (B,C) expression of popA-lacZYA and hrpB-lacZYA in tobacco leaves (the in planta enzyme assay). For the in vitro enzyme assay, strains were grown in hrp-inducing medium with supplementary proline (50 mM) to an OD600 of about 0.1 and subjected to the enzyme assay, enzymatic activities of which were presented in Miller Units. Each assay was repeated with three biological replicates, including three replicates per trial. For the in planta enzyme assay, tobacco leaves were infiltrated with bacterial suspension of 0.1 OD600 or with supplementary proline (50 mM), and leaf disks were punched for the enzyme assay with the Galacto-Light Plus kit, enzymatic activities of which were presented with luminescence normalized by cells number (RLU cell–1). The in planta enzyme assay was carried out to 12 h post-infiltration (hpi), when infiltrated regions became dried. Luminescence was determined using the GloMax20 luminometer (Promega), and cell numbers in the punched leaf disks were quantified by dilution plating. Each assay was carried out with more than four biological replicates, including six replications per trial. Mean values of all experiments were averaged with SD, and statistical significance between the wild-type strains and mutants was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett test following ANOVA. Significance level, ** indicates P < 0.01.

The T3SS expression can be enhanced to much higher levels in the host plants by coming in contact with the host signals (Valls et al., 2006). We further assessed whether ProA is required for popA expression in the intercellular spaces of tobacco leaves. The in planta enzymatic activities were assessed with the Galacto-Light Plus kit and presented as RLU cell–1 (luminescence normalized by cell number) (Zhang et al., 2011). A bacterial suspension of 0.1 OD600 (108 cfu ml–1) was infiltrated into the tobacco leaves, and bacterial cells in punched leaf disks were subjected to the in planta enzyme assay at 6–12 h post-inoculation (hpi). Enzymatic activities of the wild-type strain in tobacco leaves were about 0.4 RLU cell–1 at 6 hpi, increased to the maximum of about 1.6 RLU cell–1 at 10 hpi, and then decreased quickly to about 0.6 RLU cell–1 at 12 hpi (Figure 2B). Deletion of proA substantially impaired popA expression in tobacco leaves at 6–12 hpi, which got to the maximum of about 0.3 RLU cell–1 at 10–12 hpi (Figure 2B). Although proline in tobacco leaves might be enough for proA mutant to proliferate in tobacco leaves (Figure 1B), we also assessed whether the impaired popA expression of proA mutants in tobacco leaves was due to proline insufficiency. Extra proline (50 mM) was infiltrated into the tobacco leaves together with the bacterial suspension, and the in planta enzymatic activities were assessed. Consistent with the above results in the hrp-inducing medium, supplementary proline significantly enhanced popA expression of both the wild-type strain and proA mutants in tobacco leaves at 6–12 hpi, i.e., popA expression of the wild-type strain and proA mutants reached the maximum of about 2.3 and 0.5 RLU cell–1 at 10 and 12 hpi, respectively, which were significantly higher than those without proline supplementation (Figure 2B), indicating that proline is a novel inducer of the T3SS expression. The popA expression of proA mutants in proline-supplemented tobacco leaves was substantially lower than that of the wild-type strain in tobacco leaves with or without proline supplementation (Figure 2B).

The impact of ProA on hrpB expression was also carried out in tobacco leaves. Consistent with the above results on popA expression, supplementary proline significantly increased hrpB expression of both the wild-type strain and proA mutants in tobacco leaves at 6–12 hpi, while hrpB expression of proA mutants was significantly lower than that of the parent strain in tobacco leaves with or without proline supplementation (Figure 2C), confirming that ProA is important for the T3SS expression both in vitro and in planta and that ProA must have additional roles apart from proline biosynthesis in promoting the T3SS expression.

Involvement of ProA in the type three secretion system expression is mediated through PrhG-HrpB pathway

HrpG and PrhG positively regulate hrpB expression in parallel ways, and some other regulators, i.e., PrhI/R, PrhJ, PhcA, and PrhN, regulate the expression of hrpG and prhG, respectively (Valls et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2015; Hikichi et al., 2017). We further assessed whether deletion of proA alters the expression of these T3SS-regulating genes. Deletion of proA significantly impaired prhG expression in the proline-supplemented minimal medium (hrp-inducing medium), but not other genes (Figures 3A,B). Intriguingly, hrpG expression was significantly impaired with proA deletion but only in the nutrient-rich medium (Figure 3A). Four genes, prhIR, prhJ, phcA, and prhN, in proA mutants and parent strains were found to be expressed both in the nutrient-rich and proline-supplemented minimal media (Figures 3A,B). It is worth noting that both proA mutants and the wild-type strain grew in the nutrient-rich medium (data not shown), and the T3SS expression was not activated in the nutrient-rich medium. Involvement of ProA in the T3SS expression was mediated through PrhG-HrpB pathway under hrp-inducing conditions, but through some novel pathways to PrhG.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Involvement of ProA in the expression of T3SS-regulated genes in (A) rich medium and (B) in hrp-inducing minimal medium with supplementary proline (50 mM). Wild type (WT) refers to each reporter strain of RK5120 (hrpG-lacZAY), RK5212 (prhG-lacZAY), RK5619 (prhN-lacZAY), RQ6144 (prhIR-laczYA), RQ6074 (prhJ-lacZYA), and RK5043 (phcA-lacZAY). ΔproA refers to the deletion of proA from each reporter strain. Enzymatic activities were assessed with the in vitro enzyme assay and presented in Miller Units. Each assay was repeated with three biological replicates, including three replicates per trial. Mean values of all experiments were averaged with SD, and statistical significance between the wild-type strains and mutants was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett test following ANOVA. Significance level, ** indicates P < 0.01.

ProA is essential for pathogenicity of Ralstonia solanacearum in host plants

Deletion of proA substantially impaired the expression of the T3SS, which is essential for the pathogenicity of R. solanacearum (Genin and Denny, 2012). We evaluated whether ProA contributed to the pathogenicity of R. solanacearum. Tobacco plants were subjected to the virulence assay with inoculation methods of both soil-soaking, which mimics natural host invasion through roots, and leaf infiltration, which enables direct invasion into the intercellular spaces of leaves (Zhang et al., 2011). The wild-type strain (RK5050) wilted all test tobacco plants at about 18 dpi with the inoculation method of leaf infiltration (Figures 4A,B), and at about 12 dpi with the method of soil-soaking (Figures 4C,D). The proA mutant (RQ5735) wilted approximately 30% of the tobacco plants till 24 dpi, and complementation of proAproA + C) fully restored the impaired virulence of proA mutants to that of the wild-type strain (Figure 3), confirming that ProA is important for R. solanacearum to wilt host tobacco plants.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Virulence test of proA mutants in tobacco plants with the inoculation method of (A,B) leaf infiltration, which enables direct invasion into intercellular spaces of leaves, and (C,D) soil-soaking inoculation, which mimics natural invasion through roots. WT, the wild-type strain, RK5050 (OE1-1, popA-lacZYA); ΔproA, RQ5735 (RK5050, ΔproA). ΔproA + C, RQC1485 (complementary proA in RQ5735). For the leaf infiltration, about 50 μl of the bacterial suspension of 108 cfu ml–1 was infiltrated into the tobacco leaves with a blunt-end syringe. For the soil-soaking inoculation, a bacterial suspension was poured into a pot at a final cell density of 107 cfu g–1 of soil. Panels (A,C) refer to the virulence test with the disease index. Wilt symptoms were inspected daily and scored on a disease index scale from 0 to 4 (0, no wilting; 1, 1–25% wilting; 2, 26–50% wilting; 3, 51–75% wilting; 4, 76–100% wilted or dead). Panels (B,D) refer to surviving curves corresponding to the virulence test with the disease index of panels (A) and (B), respectively. Mean values of all experiments were averaged with SD. But, the SD was not presented in figures for virulence assay due to the consideration of esthetic appearance. Statistical significance was assessed using a post-hoc Dunnett test following ANOVA. Significance level, ** indicates P < 0.01.

ProA is important for Ralstonia solanacearum to invade and colonize host xylem vessels

As a soil-borne vascular plant pathogenic bacterium, R. solanacearum generally invades host xylem vessels through natural root openings or root wounds and subsequently invades xylem vessels, in which R. solanacearum proliferates extensively and produces copious amounts of exopolysaccharide (EPS) slime to block sap flows (Vasse et al., 1995; Genin, 2010; Milling et al., 2011). The proA mutants were proline auxotrophs that failed to grow in the minimal sucrose medium (Figure 1A), while they could eventually wilt part of tobacco plants even with the soil-soaking inoculation method, which mimics natural root invasion. We evaluated whether the deletion of proA impaired the abilities to invade and colonize tobacco xylem vessels. Tobacco plants were inoculated with the method of soil-soaking, and bacterial densities in xylem vessels were determined till 10 dpi. At this point, most of the RK5050-inoculated tobacco plants exhibited obvious wilting symptoms (Figure 4C). The wild-type strain (RK5050) could not be detected in tobacco xylem vessels at 1 dpi, but could be detected in about one-quarter of test xylem vessels at 2 dpi and could be detected in all test xylem vessels at 3 dpi (Figure 5). R. solanacearum could successfully invade tobacco xylem vessels at about 2–3 dpi with the inoculation method of soil-soaking. The proA mutants could not be detected in tobacco xylem vessels at 2 dpi, but could be detected in about one-third of test xylem vessels at 3 dpi and could be detected in all test xylem vessels at 4 dpi (Figure 5). The proA mutants could successfully invade tobacco xylem vessels at about 3–4 dpi with the inoculation method of soil-soaking, which was about 1-day delay compared to that of the wild-type strain. The wild-type strain proliferated to approximately 104 cfu g–1 at 3 dpi, reached the maximum of approximately 1010 cfu g–1 at 8 dpi and maintained this maximum density till 10 dpi (Figure 5), while proA mutants proliferated to the maximum density of approximately 109 cfu g–1 at 10 dpi (Figure 5), which was about one order of magnitude less and more slowly than that of the wild-type strain to proliferate to the maximum density in tobacco xylem vessels. Deletion of proA significantly impaired the ability of R. solanacearum to invade and colonize host xylem vessels.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Involvement of ProA in the invasion and colonization of R. solanacearum in tobacco xylem vessels. WT, the wild-type strain, RK5050 (OE1-1, popA-lacZYA); ΔproA, RQ5735 (RK5050, ΔproA); + pro, supplemented proline into pot soil. (A) Daily growth of R. solanacearum strains in tobacco xylem vessels; (B) percentage of plants colonized by R. solanacearum strains. For the proline supplementation, tobacco plants were irrigated with one-quarter of diluted Hoagland medium with supplementary proline at 10 mM for five times and subjected to bacterial inoculation. For the growth assay in tobacco xylem vessels, tobacco plants were inoculated with the inoculation method of soil-soaking, which mimics natural invasion through roots, and stem species were cut, weighted, and subjected to quantification of cell number by the dilution plating. Bacterial growth in xylem vessels was presented in log cfu g–1. Each assay was repeated with more than four biological replicates, including six plants per trial. Mean values of all experiments were averaged with SD, and statistical significance between the wild-type strains and mutants was assessed using a post–hoc Dunnett test following ANOVA.

We further assessed whether the impaired abilities of proA mutants to invade and colonize tobacco xylem vessels were due to proline insufficiency in rhizosphere soil. Tobacco plants were irrigated with one-quarter of diluted Hoagland medium with supplementary proline at 10 mM for five times and subjected to bacterial inoculation. Supplementary proline slightly enhanced the invasion rate of the wild-type strain into the tobacco xylem vessels, i.e., the wild-type strain (RK5050) could be detected in about 42% of test tobacco xylem vessels at 2 dpi, but no significant impact on proliferation inside the xylem vessels at 3–10 dpi was observed (Figure 5). On the other hand, supplementary proline did not alter the ability of proA mutants to invade and colonize tobacco xylem vessels at 2–10 dpi (Figure 5), indicating that impaired abilities of proA mutants to invade and colonize tobacco plants is independent of proline insufficiency in the rhizosphere soil.

Discussion

We here provided multiple lines of evidence to demonstrate that ProA controls proline biosynthesis in R. solanacearum, while it displays additional roles apart from proline biosynthesis in promoting the expression of the T3SS and host invasion of R. solanacearum. The proA mutants were proline auxotrophs that failed to grow in the minimal medium. Supplementary proline, but not glutamate, fully restored the diminished growth of proA mutants in the minimal medium, confirming that ProA catalyzes proline synthesis from glutamate. It was consistent with the pioneering reports that ProA catalyzes the synthesis of l-glutamic acid 5-semialdehyde from gamma-glutamyl phosphate, which is the second reaction of proline formation from glutamate in many bacteria (Krishna et al., 1979; Hoffmann et al., 2017). Nutrients inside host plants were known to be relatively limited compared to that in nutrient-rich broth medium, but relatively more abundant than that in minimal sucrose medium, since plants synthesized abundant secondary metabolites and R. solanacearum can utilize some of the plant-synthesized secondary metabolites, such as sucrose and putrescine, as the sole carbon source to fulfill the in planta proliferation (Lowe-Power et al., 2017, 2018). Fluids collected from intercellular spaces of tobacco leaves greatly enhance the T3SS expression to higher levels than that in an hrp-inducing medium, indicating that nutrient conditions in intercellular spaces of tobacco leaves were relatively limited (Mori et al., 2016). The proA mutants, proline auxotroph mutants, as well as the wild-type strain grew in the intercellular spaces of tobacco leaves, indicating that proline in tobacco leaves might be sufficient for proA mutants to proliferate inside tobacco leaves. We previously reported that some R. solanacearum auxotrophic mutants, i.e., cysteine auxotrophic mutants and aromatic amino acids auxotrophic mutants, failed to grow in the minimal sucrose medium, but grew slowly inside the host tomato and tobacco plants (Zhang et al., 2019a,b; Chen et al., 2022), indicating that nutrients inside host plants were relatively more abundant than those in the minimal sucrose medium, and thus R. solanacearum auxotrophic mutants could grow inside host plants to some extent.

The T3SS plays an essential role in the infection process of R. solanacearum toward different host plants, expression of which was activated in an hrp-inducing medium and enhanced to much higher levels inside the host plants or when it comes in contact with plant signals. Interestingly, proline was demonstrated as a novel T3SS inducer that significantly enhanced the expression levels of popA (representative gene of the T3SS) and hrpB (master regulator of the T3SS) both in vitro (hrp-inducing medium) and in planta (intercellular spaces of tobacco leaves). Although supplementary proline significantly enhanced the expression levels of popA and hrpB in proA mutants both in vitro and in planta, it was substantially lower than those of the parent strains, i.e., about one-third to one-quarter levels of the wild-type strain in proline-supplemented tobacco leaves (Figure 2B), confirming that ProA has a novel impact on the T3SS expression. Note that proA mutants grew well in the proline-supplemented minimal medium and in tobacco leaves. The impact of ProA on the T3SS expression is independent of growth deficiency under nutrient-limited conditions. Similar results were also reported in some R. solanacearum auxotrophic mutants, i.e., the T3SS expression in cysteine auxotrophic mutants and aromatic amino acids auxotrophic mutants, which failed to grow in the minimal sucrose medium but grew slowly inside host plants and exhibited significantly impaired T3SS expression (Zhang et al., 2019b; Chen et al., 2022). Thus, ProA might play additional roles apart from proline biosynthesis in promoting the T3SS expression in R. solanacearum.

The hrpB expression was substantially impaired in proA mutants, which was consistent with the master regulatory role of HrpB that directly controls the expression of the entire T3SS and T3Es genes (Mukaihara et al., 2004; Valls et al., 2006). Two close paralogs, HrpG and PrhG, positively regulate hrpB expression in parallel ways (Plener et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2013). Deletion of proA substantially impaired prhG expression in the minimal medium, while it did not alter the expression of known regulatory genes, prhIR, prhJ, prhN, and phcA, which regulate the expression of the T3SS genes indirectly. Note that the T3SS expression is not initiated in the rich medium, but activated in the minimal medium that might mimic the conditions of plant apoplastic fluids. Involvement of ProA in the T3SS expression is mediated through the pathway of PrhG to HrpB, at least for the in vitro T3SS expression. Intriguingly, proA deletion substantially impaired hrpG expression in the nutrient-rich broth medium. Both HrpG and PrhG are essential for the T3SS expression, while PrhG contributes partially to the in planta T3SS expression, host colonization, and pathogenicity, which might respond to metabolic signals or some mimic host signals, and HrpG is essential for the in planta T3SS expression, host invasion, colonization, and pathogenicity (Plener et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2013; Pedro-Jove et al., 2021). Note that the expression levels of hrpG in the rich medium are much higher than those in the minimal medium, while the T3SS expression is not activated (Yoshimochi et al., 2009b). Posttranslational modification of HrpG and PrhG is essential for their activation of the expression of hrpB and the T3SS. Deletion of proA might impair not only the transcriptional activity inside the host plants but also the posttranslational modification of HrpG and PrhG. It is not a special case, and we previously reported that CysB, a regulator of cysteine synthesis, positively regulates the expression of the T3SS genes both in vitro and in planta through the pathway PrhG to HrpB, while the impairment of the expression of the T3SS genes in cysB mutants was independent of growth deficiency under nutrient-limited conditions (Chen et al., 2022). Moreover, the T3SS expression is positively regulated by a PadR regulator PrhP through the key regulator HrpB but via some novel pathway to HrpB (Zhang et al., 2019b). All these results support the speculation that some novel pathways should be integrated for the posttranslational modification of HrpG and PrhG, and in turn regulate the expression of the T3SS in R. solanacearum. It remains to be further elucidated whether and how ProA is involved in the posttranslational modification of HrpG and PrhG, and in turn controls the expression of the T3SS genes in R. solanacearum.

As a soil-borne vascular plant pathogenic bacterium, the ability to invade and colonize host xylem vessels is critical for the pathogenicity of R. solanacearum (Vasse et al., 1995; Genin, 2010). The proA mutants could grow inside tobacco plants, while its proliferation in tobacco xylem vessels was significantly impaired, which was about one order of magnitude less than the wild-type strain to proliferate to the maximum cell densities in xylem vessels and was about 1–2 days to proliferate to the maximum cell densities in xylem vessels. Moreover, the ability of proA mutants to naturally invade tobacco xylem vessels was significantly impaired, which was about 1-day delay for proA mutants to invade tobacco xylem vessels from roots compared with the wild-type strain. Natural invasion into tobacco roots and proliferation of proA mutants in tobacco xylem are possibly the main clues for its substantially impaired virulence in tobacco plants. The T3SS is essential for R. solanacearum to successfully invade host plants, particularly at the early stage of invading host cells (Cunnac et al., 2004; Angot et al., 2006; Jones and Dangl, 2006). Supplementary proline in pot soil did not restore impaired abilities of proA mutants to invade and colonize xylem vessels, indicating that impaired abilities in proA mutants might be due to substantially impaired T3SS expression, but not due to proline insufficiency in the rhizosphere soil or inside the host plants.

All taken together, these results provide novel insights into the understanding of the biological functions of ProA, an enzyme required for the biosynthesis of proline, and its involvement in the T3SS in R. solanacearum. ProA displays novel roles apart from proline biosynthesis and functions in promoting the expression of the T3SS genes and host invasion in R. solanacearum.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author contributions

YZ and JL conceived and designed the experiments. YG, RW, YZ, NC, and LH performed the experiments. JL and YOZ analyzed and discussed the results. JL wrote the manuscript. YOZ revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

We extend our thanks for funding support from the Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology (cstc2015jcyjA10011 to JL) and the College Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program in Chongqing (S202110635062 to YZ).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.945831/full#supplementary-material

References

Angot, A., Peeters, N., Lechner, E., Vailleau, F., Baud, C., Gentzbittel, L., et al. (2006). Ralstonia solanacearum requires F-box-like domain-containing type III effectors to promote disease on several host plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci.U.SA. 103, 14620–14625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509393103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arlat, M., Gough, C. L., Zischek, C., Barberis, P. A., Trigalet, A., and Boucher, C. (1992). Transcriptional organization and expression of the large hrp gene cluster of Pseudomonas solanacearum. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 5, 187–193. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-5-187

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, M., Zhang, W., Han, L., Ru, X., Cao, Y., Hikichi, Y., et al. (2022). A CysB regulator positively regulates cysteine synthesis, expression of type III secretion system genes, and pathogenicity in Ralstonia solanacearum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 23, 679–692. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13189

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi, K. H., Gaynor, J. B., White, K. G., Lopez, C., Bosio, C. M., Karkhoff-Chweizer, R. R., et al. (2005). A Tn7-based broad range bacterial cloning and expression system. Nat. Methods. 2, 443–448. doi: 10.1038/nmeth765

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coll, N. S., and Valls, M. (2013). Current knowledge on the Ralstonia solanacearum type III secretion system. Microb. Biotechnol. 6, 614–620.

Google Scholar

Cornelis, G. R. (2006). The type III secretion injectisome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 811–825.

Google Scholar

Cunnac, S., Occhialini, A., Barberis, P., Boucher, C., and Genin, S. (2004). Inventory and functional analysis of the large Hrp regulon in Ralstonia solanacearum: identification of novel effector proteins translocated to plant host cells through the type III secretion system. Mol. Microbiol. 53, 115–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04118.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Galán, J. E., and Wolf-Watz, H. (2006). Protein delivery into eukaryotic cells by type III secretion machines. Nature 444, 567–573.

Google Scholar

Genin, S. (2010). Molecular traits controlling host range and adaptation to plants in Ralstonia solanacearum. New Phytol. 187, 920–928. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03397.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Genin, S., Brito, B., Denny, T. P., and Boucher, C. (2005). Control of the Ralstonia solanacearum Type III secretion system (Hrp) genes by the global virulence regulator PhcA. FEBS Lett. 579, 2077–2081.

Google Scholar

Genin, S., and Denny, T. P. (2012). Pathogenomics of the Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 50, 67–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-173000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hikichi, Y., Mori, Y., Ishikawa, S., Hayashi, K., Ohnishi, K., Kiba, A., et al. (2017). Regulation Involved in Colonization of Intercellular Spaces of Host Plants in Ralstonia solanacearum. Front. Plant Sci. 8:967. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00967

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoffmann, T., Bleisteiner, M., Sappa, P. K., Steil, L., Mäder, U., Völker, U., et al. (2017). Synthesis of the compatible solute proline by Bacillus subtilis: point mutations rendering the osmotically controlled proHJ promoter hyperactive. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 3700–3720. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13870

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, J. D. G., and Dangl, J. L. (2006). The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323–329.

Google Scholar

Kanda, A., Ohnishi, S., Tomiyama, H., Hasegawa, H., Yasukohchi, M., Kiba, A., et al. (2003). Type III secretion machinery-deficient mutants of Ralstonia solanacearum lose their ability to colonize resulting in loss of pathogenicity. J. General Plant Pathol. 69, 250–257.

Google Scholar

Krishna, R. V., Beilstein, P., and Leisinger, T. (1979). Biosynthesis of proline in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Properties of gamma-glutamyl phosphate reductase and 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase. Biochem. J. 181, 223–230. doi: 10.1042/bj1810223

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Landry, D., González-Fuente, M., Deslandes, L., and Peeters, N. (2020). The large, diverse, and robust arsenal of Ralstonia solanacearum type III effectors and their in planta functions. Mol. Plant Pathol. 21, 1377–1388. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12977

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lowe-Power, T. M., Hendrich, C. G., Von Roepenack-Lahaye, E., Li, B., Wu, D., Mitra, R., et al. (2017). Metabolomics of tomato xylem sap during bacterial wilt reveals Ralstonia solanacearum produces abundant putrescine, a metabolite that accelerates wilt disease. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 1330–1349. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lowe-Power, T. M., Khokhani, D., and Allen, C. (2018). How Ralstonia solanacearum Exploits and Thrives in the Flowing Plant Xylem Environment. Trends Microbiol. 26, 929–942. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.06.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marenda, M., Brito, B., Callard, D., Genin, S., Barberis, P., Boucher, C., et al. (1998). PrhA controls a novel regulatory pathway required for the specific induction of Ralstonia solanacearum hrp genes in the presence of plant cells. Mol. Microbiol. 27, 437–453. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00692.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miller, J. H. (ed.) (1992). “The lac system,” in A short course in bacterial genetics. A laboratory manual and handbook for Escherichia coli and related bacteria (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press), 43–80.

Google Scholar

Milling, A., Babujee, L., and Allen, C. (2011). Ralstonia solanacearum extracellular polysaccharide is a specific elicitor of defense responses in wilt-resistant tomato plants. PLoS One 6:e15853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015853

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mori, Y., Inoue, K., Ikeda, K., Nakayashiki, H., Higashimoto, C., Ohnishi, K., et al. (2016). The vascular plant pathogenic bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum produces biofilms required for its virulence on the surfaces of tomato cells adjacent to intercellular spaces. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17, 890–902. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12335

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mukaihara, T., Tamura, N., and Iwabuchi, M. (2010). Genome-wide identification of a large repertoire of Ralstonia solanacearum type III effector proteins by a new functional screen. Mol. Plant-Microbe. Interact. 23, 251–262. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-23-3-0251

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mukaihara, T., Tamura, N., Murata, Y., and Iwabuchi, M. (2004). Genetic screening of Hrp type III-related pathogenicity genes controlled by the HrpB transcriptional activator in Ralstonia solanacearum. Mol. Microbiol. 54, 863–875. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04328.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pedro-Jove, D. R., Puigvert, M., Sebasti, P., Macho, A. P., Monteiro, J. S., Coll, N. S., et al. (2021). Dynamic expression of Ralstonia solanacearum virulence factors and metabolism-controlling genes during plant infection. BMC Genomics 22:170. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07457-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peeters, N., Guidot, A., Vailleau, F., and Valls, M. (2013). Ralstonia solanacearum, a widespread bacterial plant pathogen in the post-genomic era. Mol. Plant Pathol. 14, 651–662. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Plener, L., Manfredi, P., Valls, M., and Genin, S. (2010). PrhG, a transcriptional regulator responding to growth conditions, is involved in the control of the type III secretion system regulon in Ralstonia solanacearum. J. Bacteriol. 192, 1011–1019. doi: 10.1128/JB.01189-09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Poueymiro, M., Cunnac, S., Barberis, P., Deslandes, L., Peeters, N., Cazale-Noel, A.-C., et al. (2009). Two type III secretion system effectors from Ralstonia solanacearum GMI1000 determine host-range specificity on tobacco. Mol. Plant. Microbe. Inter. 14, 538–550. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-5-0538

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salanoubat, M., Genin, S., Artiguenave, F., Gouzy, J., Mangenot, S., Arlat, M., et al. (2002). Genome sequence of the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. Nature 415, 497–502.

Google Scholar

Valls, M., Genin, S., and Boucher, C. (2006). Integrated regulation of the type III secretion system and other virulence determinants in Ralstonia solanacearum. PLoS Pathog. 2:e82. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vasse, J., Frey, P., and Trigalet, A. (1995). Microscopic studies of intercellular infection and protoxylem invasion of tomato roots by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 8, 241–251.

Google Scholar

Yoshimochi, T., Hikichi, Y., Kiba, A., and Ohnishi, K. (2009a). The global virulence regulator PhcA negatively controls the Ralstonia solanacearum hrp regulatory cascade by repressing expression of the PrhIR signaling proteins. J. Bacteriol. 191, 3424–3428. doi: 10.1128/JB.01113-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoshimochi, T., Zhang, Y., Kiba, A., Hikichi, Y., and Ohnishi, K. (2009b). Expression of hrpG and activation of response regulator HrpG are controlled by distinct signal cascades in Ralstonia solanacearum. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 75, 196–204.

Google Scholar

Zhang, W., Li, J., Shi, X., Hikichi, Y., Zhang, Y., and Ohnishi, K. (2019a). Functional characterization of two putative DAHP synthases of AroG1 and AroG2 and their links with Type III Secretion System in Ralstonia solanacearum. Front. Microbiol. 10:183. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00183

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Chao, Y., Zhang, L., Hikichi, Y., Ohnishi, K., and Li, J. (2021). The Tn7-based genomic integration is dependent on an attTn7 box in the glms gene and is site-specific with monocopy in Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Mol Plant Microbe. Interact. 34, 720–725. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-11-20-0325-SC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Chen, L., Takehi, Y., Kiba, A., Hikichi, Y., and Ohnishi, K. (2013). Functional analysis of Ralstonia solanacearum PrhG regulating the hrp regulon in host plants. Microbiol. SGM. 159, 1695–1704. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.067819-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Kiba, A., Hikichi, Y., and Ohnishi, K. (2011). prhKLM genes of Ralstonia solanacearum encode novel activators of hrp regulon and are required for pathogenesis in tomato. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 317, 75–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02213.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Luo, F., Wu, D., Hikichi, Y., Kiba, A., Igarashi, Y., et al. (2015). PrhN, a putative MarR family transcriptional regulator, is involved in positive regulation of type III secretion system and full virulence of Ralstonia solanacearum. Front. Microbiol. 6:357. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00357

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Zhang, W., Han, L., Li, J., Shi, X., Hikichi, Y., et al. (2019b). Involvement of a PadR regulator PrhP on virulence of Ralstonia solanacearum by controlling detoxification of phenolic acids and type III secretion system. Mol. Plant Pathol. 20, 1477–1490. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12854

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zuluaga, A. P., Puigvert, M., and Valls, M. (2013). Novel plant inputs influencing Ralstonia solanacearum during infection. Front. Microbiol. 4:349. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00349

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Ralstonia solanacearum, type three secretion system (T3SS), pathogenesis, ProA, amino acid biosynthesis

Citation: Guan Y, Wang R, Chen N, Zhu Y, Han L, Chen X, Li J and Zhang Y (2022) Functional characterization of a gamma-glutamyl phosphate reductase ProA in proline biosynthesis and promoting expression of type three secretion system in Ralstonia solanacearum. Front. Microbiol. 13:945831. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.945831

Received: 17 May 2022; Accepted: 05 August 2022;
Published: 29 August 2022.

Edited by:

Shunyuan Xiao, University of Maryland, College Park, United States

Reviewed by:

Fanhong Meng, Texas A&M University, United States
Lifang Zou, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

Copyright © 2022 Guan, Wang, Chen, Zhu, Han, Chen, Li and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jing Li, hellolijing@126.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.