Editorial: Microbial interactions of Clostridioides difficile

Editorial on the Research Topic
Microbial interactions of Clostridioides difficile

Clostridioides difficile is a spore-forming anaerobic bacterium that causes gut infections in both human and non-human animals. In the gut, C. difficile colonization and pathogenicity are affected by nutrients, chemicals (e.g., metabolites), other bacteria and inflammation. Investigations of interactions with microbes and immune cells are important for effective disease treatment, and prevention and control of bacterial transmission. New strategies based on re-shaping patient gut microbiota, such as through probiotics or fecal microbiota transplantation, are effective but have biologically complex mechanisms yet to be comprehensively understood.

In this Research Topic, a collection of six articles provides a deeper understanding of C. difficile interactions with gut microbiota, intestinal cells and metabolites. Horvat et al. examined C. difficile cell-cell and supernatant-cell interactions with gut microbiota derived from healthy children through batch culture. They found both C. difficile cells and cell-free conditioned medium affected diversity of bacterial communities and abundance of metabolites, indicating direct and indirect ways in which C. difficile can influence its environment. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ), normally expressed in adipose tissues and colonic epithelial cells, was shown for the first time to be involved in C. difficile infection (CDI) by Lai et al. Using mouse models, the authors showed PPAR-γ downregulation in CDI led to intestinal permeability. An agonist of PPAR-γ, pioglitazone, limited disease symptoms in C. difficile-infected mice. This provides a new strategy for restoring intestinal integrity during CDI. Another strategy for reshaping patient gut microbiota could be through probiotics. Wu et al. found that Akkermansia muciniphila, a commensal in the healthy human gut, protected against CDI in a mouse model by limiting intestinal tissue damage. A. muciniphila maintained microbial diversity and metabolite levels in the presence of C. difficile at levels similar to a healthy gut. The overall effect was colonization resistance against CDI. Currently prescribed probiotics to prevent recurrent CDI are Saccharomyces boulardii, Lactobacillus acidophilus and L. casei, however, these did not prevent primary CDI (Heil et al., 2021). Alternatives such as A. muciniphila could be valuable in this regard.

Metabolites of C. difficile are known to be important for microbial interactions, however, there have been few attempts to characterize them. Biwer et al. identified 105 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced as metabolites of C. difficile when grown in minimal medium, 28 of which were new. The authors proposed a biosynthetic pathway involving cysteine and methionine for VOC production, some of which have known effects on prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. This study forms a basis for targeted investigations of C. difficile biochemical pathways corresponding to nutrient availability. In the gut, nutrients are dynamic and C. difficile gene transcription must be regulated in response to such changing external factors in large part through sigma factors. A previously predicted alternative sigma factor, SigL, was shown by Clark et al. to control metabolism, virulence and sporulation in C. difficile. Through insertional mutation of sigL in two isolates representing ribotypes 027 and 078, the authors revealed pleiotropic, strain-specific and growth phase-specific gene regulation in part corresponding to genetic differences of the two ribotypes. Although not examined in this study, mobile genetic elements in these strains could have contributed to strain-specific variation and would be a logical next target for further investigations.

Due to the consequences of the combination of C. difficile and a disrupted gut microbiome, unsurprisingly, CDI is associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Morbidity and mortality are higher in IBD patients with CDI and, with a global increasing incidence of both IBD and community-associated CDI, it is a significant problem. Mahnic et al. determined gut bacterial communities in non-IBD and IBD patients with CDI. Only in non-IBD patients, CDI was associated with lower diversity of gut bacteria compared to uninfected patients. In IBD patients, reduced gut bacterial diversity was found regardless of CDI. Interestingly, 14 differentially represented operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were common to both CDI and IBD, and four OTUs were significantly decreased in IBD patients with CDI, suggesting a role in disease severity in this patient group.

The main messages from these papers are: C. difficile strains can behave very differently to the same environmental stimuli, and chemicals they release have as great a role to play in modulating other bacteria and host cells as C. difficile toxins. Colonization is dependent on a disrupted gut microbiota and agents capable of restoring microbiome richness are effective in limiting CDI. While much C. difficile research has been focused on virulence and sporulation, it is equally important to study C. difficile in the presence of other gut constituents for a more holistic understanding of its pathogenicity.

Author contributions

SG drafted the manuscript. TR and PM edited it. All authors approved the final version for submission.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Heil, E. L., Harris, A. D., Brown, C., Seung, H., Thom, K. A., Von Rosenvinge, E., et al. (2021). A multicenter evaluation of probiotic use for the primary prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 73, 1330–1337. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab417

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar