Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Microbiol., 04 January 2023
Sec. Infectious Agents and Disease
This article is part of the Research Topic Protein Homeostasis in Host-Pathogen Interactions View all 6 articles

Editorial: Protein homeostasis in host-pathogen interactions

\nJinki Yeom,,
Jinki Yeom1,2,3*Donghyuk ShinDonghyuk Shin4Yuan Qiao,Yuan Qiao5,6
  • 1Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 2Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 3Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 4Department of System Biology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • 5Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
  • 6School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

Editorial on the Research Topic
Protein homeostasis in host-pathogen interactions

All living organisms maintain protein homeostasis, which regulates survival and proliferation (Hoppe and Cohen, 2020). Stress conditions can disrupt protein homeostasis by impacting translation, protein folding, and proteolysis (Arnsburg and Kirstein-Miles, 2014). Pathogens encounter stress conditions during infection, such as nutritional starvation and oxidative stress, and, thus, must maintain protein homeostasis to survive in the host environment (Fang et al., 2016). On the other hand, when host cells meet pathogens during infection, they regulate their own proteome to inhibit pathogen growth and to activate an immune response (Denzer et al., 2020). Host and pathogens try to maintain protein homeostasis during infection to defeat each other.

Pathogens encounter harsh environments by the host immune system, which enables a disruption of protein homeostasis. First, macrophage and neutrophil cells try to engulf pathogens, and then destroy the pathogens by autolysosome. To survive and proliferate inside innate immune cells, pathogens need to overcome ROS, RNS, acidic pH, and nutritional starvation (Silva and Correia-Neves, 2012). Second, host cells can sequester essential metals for pathogen growth, such as iron, zinc, and magnesium (Hennigar and McClung, 2016). Third, immunes cells produce antimicrobial peptides to disrupt membrane and cell wall in pathogens (Boparai and Sharma, 2020). Fourth, commensal microbiota can trigger the host immune response, which activates the host defense system against pathogens (Belkaid and Hand, 2014). In summary, pathogens need to overcome stress conditions from host environments during infection, which can disturb protein homeostasis in pathogens.

There are several examples of how microorganisms control the host immune response by regulating protein homeostasis. First, Horianopoulos et al. determined that the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans produces Dnj1 chaperone by sensing elevated temperatures during infection. Dnj1 is required for protein homeostasis by regulating protein folding, compromising the host immune system, and maintaining membrane homeostasis. Chaperone, a key factor for protein homeostasis, governs pathogenesis and survival during fungal pathogen infections. Second, iron is an essential metal for both the host and the pathogen during infection. Chantes-Guerra et al. revealed that the mammalian pathogenic bacterium Gallibacterum anatis secrets siderophore, a natural chelator to capture iron from the host, to obtain iron. Receptor proteins in bacteria should recognize a siderophore-iron complex to uptake iron. G. anatis regulates proteome to produce additional siderophore receptor systems that maintain iron homeostasis in pathogens. This could benefit pathogenic bacterium to survive and proliferate in the host. Third, gut microbiota is essential to defend against pathogens by regulating host immune response and enhancing production of mucosal barrier. Huang et al. reported that berberine, a natural extract of Rhizoma Coptidis, becomes probiotic by promoting butyrate production, which can reduce cancer cell growth in colon cancer. It confers change of microbiota composition by metabolic production, which leads to reduced cancer cell growth.

In host-pathogen interaction, host cells regulate protein homeostasis to control pathogen growth during infection. First, the host rearranges proteolytic pathways during infection (Cornejo et al., 2017). Host cells attach ubiquitin to the pathogens' membrane proteins, which cleans up pathogens by autophagy. Several proteins are highly activated by invading pathogens, thereby increasing ubiquitination and activating an autophagy pathway. Second, metal ions can impact protein homeostasis by regulating protein folding, conformational change, cellular communication, and catalysis. Host cells capture essential metal ions to inhibit pathogen growth, a process that is termed nutritional immunity and that leads to proteome rearrangement (Hennigar and McClung, 2016). Third, host cells activate defense enzymes and carrier proteins for ROS to impede pathogen growth. Innate immune cells produce radicals to kill pathogens from the mitochondria (Silwal et al., 2020). Mitochondrial ROS can generate signaling responses and changes in nuclear gene expression in multiple ways, thus host cells endeavor to maintain protein homeostasis (Silwal et al., 2020). Together, host cells try to maintain protein homeostasis because proteome of host cells is impacted by invading pathogens during infection.

There are several examples of how host cells regulate pathogen growth by protein homeostasis. First, Guo et al. investigated that the steroid hormone estrogen is involved in the immunomodulatory processes of Neisseria meningitidis infection. Estrogen binds to estrogen receptor β, regulates the p38-MAPK signaling pathway, and inhibits the release of inflammatory factors during bacterial infection, thus reducing the occurrence and development of the inflammatory response of host cells after N. meningitidis infection. Thus, host cells use steroid hormones to maintain cellular homeostasis by regulating immune signaling during infection. Second, dengue virus (DENV) is spread out to people through the bite of an infected Aedes species mosquito. Wang et al. established that the mosquito rearranges overall proteome during DEVN infection, which maintains homeostasis of protein and immune response. The mosquito enriches proteins related to the ubiquitin ligase complex, the structural constituent of cuticle, the carbohydrate metabolism, and lipid metabolism pathways, which promotes virus replication in the vector and the transmission to the animal. In summary, host cells modulate proteome to regulate pathogen proliferation.

Conclusion

Host and pathogens continuously interact, which leads to niche modulating environments during infection. Homeostasis of proteome is critical for host-pathogen interaction because all living organisms regulate biological activities by proteins. Currently, it is poorly understood how host and pathogen maintain protein homeostasis during infection. Thus, more comprehensive and disease-specific studies are necessary to investigate the mechanism of proteome homeostasis during infection.

Author contributions

JY wrote the draft, with input from DS and YQ. JY revised the final version. All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Programs (2021R1C1C1005184 and 2020M3A9H5104237 to JY) and the SNU Startup Fund (to JY).

Acknowledgments

We thank all the contributing authors and reviewers of this Research Topic. Also, we would like to thank the Journal's Editorial Team for their professional support throughout.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Arnsburg, K., and Kirstein-Miles, J. (2014). Interrelation between protein synthesis, proteostasis and life span. Curr. Genomics. 15, 66–75. doi: 10.2174/1389202915666140210210542

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Belkaid, Y., and Hand, T. W. (2014). Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell. 157, 121–141. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.03.011.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boparai, J. K., and Sharma, P. K. (2020). Mini review on antimicrobial peptides, sources, mechanism and recent applications. Protein. Pept. Lett. 27, 4–16. doi: 10.2174/18755305MTAwENDE80

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cornejo, E., Schlaermann, P., and Mukherjee, S. (2017). How to rewire the host cell: A home improvement guide for intracellular bacteria. J. Cell Biol. 216, 3931–3948. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201701095

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Denzer, L., Schroten, H., and Schwerk, C. (2020). From gene to protein-how bacterial virulence factors manipulate host gene expression during infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 3730. doi: 10.3390/ijms21103730

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fang, F. C., Frawley, E. R., Tapscott, T., and Vazquez-Torres, A. (2016). Bacterial Stress Responses during Host Infection. Cell Host. Microbe. 20, 133–143. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.07.009.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hennigar, S. R., and McClung, J. P. (2016). Nutritional immunity: starving pathogens of trace minerals. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 10, 170–173. doi: 10.1177/1559827616629117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoppe, T., and Cohen, E. (2020). Organismal protein homeostasis mechanisms. Genetics. 215, 889–901. doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.301283

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva, M. T., and Correia-Neves, M. (2012). Neutrophils and macrophages: the main partners of phagocyte cell systems. Front. Immunol. 3, 174. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00174

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silwal, P., Kim, J. K., Kim, Y. J., and Jo, E. K. (2020). Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species: double-edged weapon in host defense and pathological inflammation during infection. Front. Immunol. 11, 1649. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: infection, protein homeostasis, host-pathogen interaction, immune response, pathogen

Citation: Yeom J, Shin D and Qiao Y (2023) Editorial: Protein homeostasis in host-pathogen interactions. Front. Microbiol. 13:1115857. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1115857

Received: 04 December 2022; Accepted: 14 December 2022;
Published: 04 January 2023.

Edited by:

Axel Cloeckaert, Institut National de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), France

Copyright © 2023 Yeom, Shin and Qiao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jinki Yeom, yes jinki.yeom@snu.ac.kr

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.