Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 12 January 2023
Sec. Microorganisms in Vertebrate Digestive Systems

Radix paeoniae alba polysaccharide attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced intestinal injury by regulating gut microbiota

Aoyun Li,&#x;Aoyun Li1,2Jinxue Ding&#x;Jinxue Ding1Ting ShenTing Shen1Ying LiangYing Liang3Fan WeiFan Wei3Yi WuYi Wu1Mudassar IqbalMudassar Iqbal4Muhammad Fakhar-e-Alam KulyarMuhammad Fakhar-e-Alam Kulyar2Kun Li
Kun Li1*Kunhua Wei
Kunhua Wei3*
  • 1College of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
  • 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
  • 3Guangxi Key Laboratory of Medicinal Resources Protection and Genetic Improvement, Guangxi Engineering Research Center of TCM Resource Intelligent Creation, Guangxi Botanical Garden of Medicinal Plants, Nanning, China
  • 4Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Accumulating evidence indicated that oxidative stress is closely related to inflammation and the progression of multiple chronic diseases, which seriously threaten the host health. Currently, multiple plant-derived polysaccharides have been demonstrated to ameliorate the negative effects of oxidative stress on the host, but the potential protective effect of radix paeoniae alba polysaccharide (RPAP) on host have not been well characterized. Here, we investigated whether different doses of RPAP administration could alleviate lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced intestinal injury and gut microbial dysbiosis in mice. Results indicated that RPAP administration effectively alleviated LPS-induced intestinal damage in dose dependent. Additionally, amplicon sequencing showed that RPAP administration reversed the significant decrease in gut microbial diversity caused by LPS exposure and restored the alpha-diversity indices to normal levels. Microbial taxonomic investigation also indicated that LPS exposure resulted in significant changes in the gut microbial composition, characterized by a decrease in the abundances of beneficial bacteria (Lactobacillus, Alistipes, Bacillus, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, etc.) and an increase in the contents of pathogenic bacteria (Klebsiella, Helicobacter, Enterococcus, etc.). However, RPAP administration, especially in high doses, could improve the composition of the gut microbiota by altering the abundance of some bacteria. Taken together, this study demonstrated that RPAP administration could ameliorate LPS-induced intestinal injury by regulating gut microbiota. Meanwhile, this also provides the basis for the popularization and application of RPAP and alleviating oxidative stress from the perspective of gut microbiota.

Introduction

Oxidative stress is a state of imbalance between oxidation and antioxidant defense system in the body, which may cause multiple organ damage and dysfunction (Garcia-Mesa et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2019). Previous studies indicated that enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems could eliminate accumulated reactive oxygen species (ROS) to decrease oxidative stress and ensure host health (Singh and Vinayak, 2017; Li B. et al., 2019). However, multiple factors such as drinking, smoking, weaning, environmental change, heavy metal and endotoxin could result in the massive production and accumulation of ROS and thus causing oxidative stress (Xu J. et al., 2020; Caliri et al., 2021). Studies demonstrated that oxidative stress caused by ROS can cause many chronic diseases in humans and animals such as aging, inflammation, atherosclerosis and even cancer (Wigner et al., 2021; Kalinina et al., 2022). Consequently, reducing oxidative stress is essential to ensure human and animal health. Recently, research about gut microbiota has attracted increasing attention due to its important roles in oxidative stress and oxidative stress-related diseases (Han et al., 2021; Hao et al., 2021).

Gut microbiome interacts with the host and plays a key role in host health (Maslowski et al., 2009; Das et al., 2021). Statistically, the normal intestine harbors over 100 trillion of microorganisms including bacteria (98%), fungi (0.1%), viruses, protists and archaea, approximately ten times the total amount of host cells (Li et al., 2021a). Increasing evidence demonstrated that gut microbiota not only aid in nutritional acquisition of host, such as amino acids/vitamins synthesis and food digestion and absorption, but also make significant contributions in intestinal epithelium differentiation, mucosal immunity and intestinal homeostasis (Chen H. L. et al., 2021; Wozniak et al., 2021). Importantly, gut microbiota also involved in intestinal mucosal barrier maintenance and immune defense system development, indicating its crucial roles in immunity and disease resistance (Lau et al., 2016; Yun et al., 2022). However, gut microbial composition, diversity and abundance continuously shifts under the influence of host- and environmental-related factors including age, diet, weather and oxidative stress (Makki et al., 2018; Li et al., 2022). Earlier studies demonstrated that stabilized gut microbiota could ensure intestinal functions to function properly, whereas significant changes in gut microbial composition and diversity namely gut microbial dysbiosis may result in etiopathology consequences (Qin et al., 2012; Chi et al., 2019). Besides the common gastrointestinal diseases including diarrhea and colitis, disordered gut microbial community and its related metabolites can also affect both near and far organ systems through blood circulation, causing systemic effects (Chassaing et al., 2015; Li Y. et al., 2019). Notably, gut microbial community or microbial signals can also activate intestinal epithelial cell and other cell types to produce physiological ROS that participate in multiple cellular signaling (Wu et al., 2022). However, gut microbial dysbiosis causes over-accumulation of ROS and oxidative stress. Consequently, maintaining gut microbial homeostasis is critical for alleviating oxidative stress and decreasing oxidative stress-related diseases.

Exogenous antioxidants administration has long been considered as an effective way to relieve oxidative stress and prevent oxidant-related diseases (Chen L. et al., 2021). As an important source of functional dietary antioxidant ingredients, polysaccharides derived from plants, animals and microorganisms have been demonstrated to be essential candidates for developing the promising non-toxic antioxidants (Chen et al., 2022). Among plant polysaccharides, radix paeoniae alba polysaccharide (RPAP) has attracted increasing attention because of its multiple health benefits to the host. RPAP is one of the important active components of radix paeoniae alba, which showed multiple important biological activities such as anti-depression, immunological regulation, whitening and alleviating hepatic injury (Zhang et al., 2020). Moreover, recent reports on RPAP also revealed its key roles in the gastrointestinal disease and relieve oxidative stress. For instance, Zhang et al. (2020) demonstrated that RPAP not only possessed DPPH scavenging activity and reducing power but also could alleviate H2O2-induced oxidative damage in PC12 cells. Although numerous investigations indicated the positive regulatory effects of RPAP on the host health, it remains unclear whether RPAP could ameliorate intestinal injury and gut microbial dysbiosis caused by LPS. Here, we explored the protective effect of RPAP on LPS induced oxidative damages of intestine.

Materials and methods

Animal experiments and sample collection

A group of 100 28-day-old healthy Kunming mice (initial weight 25 ± 2 g) were purchased and maintained under the standard ambient temperature, sanitary condition and illumination as previously described. Prior to the experiment, all the subjects were performed physical examinations to avoid deformity and other congenital diseases. After acclimatization for 3 days, an equal number of mice (n = 20, 10 male and 10 female) were divided into control group, LPS-induced group (LPS), low dose RPAP administration group (75 mg/Kg, RL), medium dose RPAP administration group (150 mg/Kg, RM) and high dose RPAP administration group (300 mg/Kg, RH). Mice in RPAP administration groups were compulsively gavaged with 0.2 ml of RPAP with different dose, whereas the mice in control and LPS group received same dose of normal saline by the same way from day 1 to 21. Throughout the trial, all the mice were provided sufficient feed and water. Mice in the LPS, RH, RM and RL groups were intraperitoneally injected with LPS (10 mg/kg) but controls were injected with the same dose of normal saline on days 22 of the experimental study. After 12 h, all mice were dissected and jejunum, ileum, colon and cecum were collected. Subsequently, the sterile fecal samplers were applied to collect rectal feces of each subjects. The achieved samples were immediately sub-sampled from the intermediate region to maximally decrease pollution by bedding and flooring and then snap-frozen utilizing liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C for further study.

Histological observations

The specific procedures and processes for tissue section preparation and H&E staining were based on previous studies. Briefly, fresh tissues acquired from dissected mice such as jejunum, ileum, cecum and colon were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated in gradient ethanol and xylene, embedded in paraffin and prepared 4–5 μm sections. The tissue sections were subsequently subjected to stain with hematoxylin. Representative micrographs of histological sections were taken using inverted microscope.

DNA extraction and illumina MiSeq sequencing

All frozen colonic contents were thawed and homogenized and then subjected to genomic DNA extraction using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) following suggested instructions of manufacturer. Subsequently, the extracts were performed electrophoresis and quantification to evaluate their concentration and integrity. To characterize gut microbial composition and changes, we amplified the V3/V4 region using specific primers (338F: ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA and 806R: GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT) synthesized based on conserved regions. The specific procedures of the PCR amplification was determined based on previous study (Hu et al., 2016). Purification and fluorescent quantitation of amplified products were conducted to prepare sequencing library. The initial libraries need to be properly modified including sequence end repair, sequencing libraries enrichment and purification. Qualified libraries with a concentration greater than 2 and only one peak were performed paired-end sequencing using MiSeq sequencing machine. To obtain more accurate data, we performed further processing on the initial data from sequencing. The short (less than 200 bp), mismatched, unqualified and chimera sequences were abandoned to acquire effective sequence. According to 97% sequence similarity, the qualified sequences were clustered and OTUs partitioned. Alpha diversity indices were calculated based on the quantity of OTUs in each sample to explore the changes in gut microbial diversity and abundance. Meanwhile, PCoA plots were also generated to visualize the differences in gut microbial principal components. Metastats analysis and LEfSe were used to recognize differential taxon. Statistical analysis of data was performed using R (v3.0.3) and GraphPad Prism (version 8.0c). p-values (means ± SD) < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Histological observations

The histopathological alterations in jejunum, ileum, cecum and colon are presented in Figure 1. H&E staining revealed that the intestines in control group were integrated with clear borders, whereas those in LPS-induced mice were arranged loosely, irregularly and disorderly, accompanied by mucosal edema and infiltration of inflammatory cells in some tissues. However, RPAP administration can alleviate the damage of intestinal villi caused by LPS, indicating that RPAP has a protective effect on LPS-induced intestinal oxidative damage.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Radix paeoniae alba polysaccharide (RPAP) administration ameliorated LPS-induced intestinal injury in mice. Histological examination of the jejunum, ileum, caecum, and colon.

Data acquisition and analysis

In this study, 30 samples from five groups were performed amplicon sequencing to explore the protective effect of RPAP on the gut microbiota. Amplicon sequencing results showed that a total of 44,362 (C = 428,534, LPS = 315,828, RH = 428,534, RM = 428,534 and RL = 428,534) raw sequences were generated (Table 1). Moreover, 428,534 (C = 428,534, LPS = 315,828, RH = 428,534, RM = 428,534 and RL = 428,534) valid sequences were totally acquired after quality evaluation, with an effective rate of more than 60%. The multi samples rarefaction and Shannon curves of all samples showed the sufficient species coverage (Figures 2A,B). Meanwhile, the species rank curve in each sample was wide and decreased slowly, showing the satisfactory sequencing evenness and richness (Figure 2C). The effective sequences were subsequently clustered into 100 OTUs, ranging from 200 to 330 OTUs per sample, based on 97% nucleotide-sequence similarity (Figures 2D,E). Moreover, the amount of unique OTUs in the C, LPS, RH, RM and RL groups were 100, 200, 300, 104, and 22, respectively and 169 OTUs were in common, accounting for 93.02% of the overall OTUs.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The bacterial sequence information of each sample.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) distribution and feasibility analysis of data. Rarefaction (A,B) and rank abundance curves (C) were applied for assessing the depth of amplicon sequencing. (D) The numbers in the different colored areas represent the quantity of OTUs. (E) Histogram shows the number of OTUs in each sample.

Radix paeoniae alba polysaccharide administration significantly altered the gut microbial diversity

To further assess the regulating effect of RPAP in gut microbiota, we comparatively analyzed changes in gut microbial diversities between different groups. Good’s coverage estimations of each group ranged from 99.85 to 99.93%, demonstrating almost all bacterial phenotypes were identified (Figure 3A). Statistical analysis of alpha diversity showed that there were statistically distinct differences in the Chao1 (288.04 ± 49.86 vs. 190.54 ± 24.21, p < 0.01), ACE (287.89 ± 49.89 vs. 190.34 ± 24.11, p < 0.01) and Shannon (6.33 ± 0.70 vs. 5.43 ± 0.75, p < 0.05) indices between the C and LPS groups, indicating that LPS administration dramatically decrease gut microbial diversity and abundance (Figures 3BD). However, RPAP administration could reverse LPS-induced gut microbial dysbiosis and its effect was proportional to the RPAP concentration. Specifically, high-dose RPAP administration could restore the gut microbial diversity and abundance to normal levels and significantly higher than those in the LPS group. Moreover, beta diversity analysis revealed that the dots in C and LPS groups were separated but closer together with the RPAP-treated groups, suggesting that LPS significantly affect the gut microbial structure, whereas RPAP administration could alleviate the present phenomenon (Figures 3E,F).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Radix paeoniae alba polysaccharide (RPAP) administration restored significant decrease in gut microbial diversity caused by LPS exposure. The differences of gut microbial alpha-diversity among C, LPS, RH, RM, and RL groups were computed by the Good’s coverage (A), Chao1 (B), ACE (C) and Shannon (D) indices. (E,F) PCoA plots based on the weighted and unweighted UniFrac distance. All data was represented as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Comparative analysis of the gut microbial composition between different groups

We also investigated the composition and abundance of dominant intestinal bacteria in different taxonomical levels and observed considerable variability. Specifically, there were 9 phyla and 119 genera found in 30 samples, ranging from 5 to 7 phyla per sample. The phyla Firmicutes (67.32, 28.02%) and Bacteroidota (25.48, 28.00%) were abundantly present in the C and RH groups, whereas the dominant phyla observed in the RM and RL groups were Firmicutes (25.47, 29.03%) and Proteobacteria (40.44, 30.55%; Figure 4A). Moreover, the gut microbiota in LPS group was predominated by Proteobacteria (36.59%), Campylobacterota (32.55%) and Firmicutes (17.91%) in descending order. Other phyla such as Deferribacterota (0.032, 1.53%, 0.34, 2.46, 0.70%), Verrucomicrobiota (0.0075, 0.33, 0.88, 1.08, and 0.32%) and Patescibacteria (1.09, 0.066, 0.92, 0.075, and 0.10%) in the C, LPS, RH, RM and RL groups were identified in low abundances. Among recognized genera, Escherichia_Shigella (13.96, 16.95, and 24.38%), Helicobacter (32.54, 14.03, and 21.62%) and Ligilactobacillus (10.72, 14.34, and 11.32%) were the most predominant genus in the LPS, RH and RL groups, accounting for over 45% of the total composition (Figure 4B). Moreover, the preponderant bacterial genus found in gut microbiota in the C group were Ligilactobacillus (20.61%), Lactobacillus (20.60%) and unclassified_Muribaculaceae (13.98%), whereas Escherichia_Shigella (24.72%) was the most dominant genus in the RM group, followed by Ligilactobacillus (14.84%) and Klebsiella (13.95%). Moreover, gut microbial distribution and variability between the C, LPS, RH, RM, and RL groups could also be observed by the visualized clustering heatmap (Figure 4C).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Effects of RPAP administration on gut microbial composition in LPS-induced mice. Composition and relative proportion of dominant bacteria at the phylum (A) and genus levels (B). (C) Heatmap of the 50 most abundant bacterial genera in the C, LPS, RH, RM, and RL groups.

To further explore the influence of RPAP on gut microbial composition, Metastats analysis was performed for different classification levels. At the phylum level, the LPS group showed dramatically higher abundance of Proteobacteria and Campylobacterota, whereas the C group enriched for Firmicutes, Patescibacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteriota (Figure 5). Compared with the C group, the gut microbiota in the LPS group showed distinct decrease in the relative abundance of Alistipes, Odoribacter, Candidatus_Saccharimonas, Streptococcus, uncultured_Bacteroidales_bacterium, Incertae_Sedis, unclassified_Muribaculaceae, unclassified_Clostridia_UCG_014, Candidatus_Arthromitus, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, Lactobacillus, Roseburia, unclassified_Eggerthellaceae, Enterorhabdus, uncultured_Clostridiales_bacterium, Gemella, Bacillus, NK4A214_group, and Parvibacter, whereas Helicobacter, Bacteroides, Ralstonia, Enterococcus, Escherichia_Shigella and Klebsiella increased significantly. Furthermore, a comparison of the LPS and RH groups showed significant decline in the abundance of 9 genus (Alloprevotella, Gemella, Odoribacter, Alistipes, unclassified_Muribaculaceae, unclassified_Eggerthellaceae, Lactobacillus, unclassified_Oscillospiraceae and Muribaculum) as well as a significant increase in the abundance of 1 genus (Klebsiella). We also observed that six bacterial genera were dramatically different between the LPS and RM groups. Among differential taxa, Gemella, Streptococcus, Alloprevotella and Muribaculum were observed to be more abundant in the RM group than in the LPS group, whereas the Erysipelatoclostridium and Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group exhibited the opposite trend (Supplementary Figure S1). The RL group showed dramatically higher abundance of Oscillibacter than that of LPS, whereas the relative abundance of Erysipelatoclostridium and Klebsiella were lower. Considering this discriminant analysis could not detect all the taxon, LEfSe combined with LDA scores were used to further recognize the differential bacteria. Besides the above-mentioned differential taxa, we also observed that Deferribacterota, Mucispirillum, Enterobacter and Butyricimonas were significantly more preponderant in LPS group than in the C group, whereas the abundance of Monoglobus and Turicibacter were lower (Figures 6A,B). For the comparison between the LPS and RH groups, the RH group showed the higher abundance of Patescibacteria, Alistipes_obesi, Parasutterella, and Streptococcus (Figures 6C,D).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Statistical analysis of differential bacteria between different groups at the phylum and genus levels. All data was represented as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) integrated with Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) scores recognized differentially abundant taxon associated with RPAP administration. (A,C) Cladogram shows the phylogenetic distribution of differential biomarkers. (B,D) The criterion for significant difference is LDA scores > 2.

Correlation network analysis

Lactobacillus was positively associated with Bacillus (0.8292), Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group (0.5239), Alistipes (0.6485), Odoribacter (0.7208) and Monoglobus (0.7562) but negatively related to Enterococcus (0.6054) and Enterobacter (0.4702; Figure 7). Bacillus was positively associated with Alistipes (0.5415). Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group was positively related to Muribaculum (0.5190), Monoglobus (0.4841), Erysipelatoclostridium (0.4410) and Incertae_Sedis (0.5865). Alistipes was positively associated with Alloprevotella (0.4192), Adlercreutzia (0.4017), Parvibacter (0.5141), Caldicoprobacter (0.3976) and Anaerofustis (0.4844) but negatively related to Enterobacter (0.4419) and Enterococcus (0.5266). Klebsiella was negatively related to Alistipes (0.4264). Enterococcus was negatively associated with Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group (0.6712), Erysipelatoclostridium (0.5269), Incertae_Sedis (0.4001), Odoribacter (0.6703), Candidatus_Saccharimonas (0.5884) and Anaerofustis (0.5099).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Correlation network analysis of gut bacterial community. Bacterial genera are indicated by differently colored dots. Positive and negative correlations are represented by red and green lines, respectively. Detailed data were shown in the Supplementary Table S1.

Discussion

Oxidative stress has been demonstrated to cause septicemia, acidosis, enteritis, pneumonia and decrease meat quality and fertility (Kuwano et al., 2003; Xu W. et al., 2020). As the organ most susceptible to oxidative stress, oxidative stress in the intestinal system can affect the digestion and absorption of nutrients and cause abnormal glandular secretion, intestinal damage, gastrointestinal dysfunction and intestinal infection, seriously threatening animal production and health (Qiao et al., 2013). Gut microbiota is closely related to gut health, thus the gut microbial homeostasis is inevitably affected by intestinal damage caused by oxidative stress (Zhao et al., 2018). Additionally, gut microbial dysbiosis can further affect intestinal permeability, intestinal mucosal immunity and even other organs such as liver and brain, causing more serious pathological consequences (Boursier et al., 2016). Consequently, maintaining the intestinal health and gut microbial homeostasis is critical for host health. As an effective extract of traditional Chinese medicine, polysaccharides have been demonstrated to exhibit multiple pharmacological effects such as anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, antioxidant and hypoglycemic, but there are still few studies on RPAP. Here, we systematically explored the protective effects of RPAP administration on intestinal health and microbiota in LPS-induced mice.

Gut microbial diversity has long been regarded as an important indicator for assessing gut microbial homeostasis (Jin et al., 2019). Typically, gut microbial community is in a relatively stable status and this is the prerequisite for intestine to perform various complex physiological functions (Li et al., 2021b). Research indicated that many factors such as gender, age and diet could cause dynamic changes in gut microbiota but this physiological fluctuation cannot destroy intestinal homeostasis and host health (Jiao et al., 2016; Dias et al., 2018). However, strong external stimulus such as antibiotic, oxidative damage, malignant tumor and heavy metal may impair intestinal morphology and environment, which in turn affect microbial growth and survival and force existing microbes to adapt to new environment, causing gut microbial dysbiosis (Lin et al., 2021; Liao et al., 2022). Xu et al. (2019) reported that LPS exposure impaired intestinal morphology and resulted in gut microbial dysbiosis in mice. Moreover, the disruptive effect of LPS on gut microbial homeostasis was also demonstrated in other exploratory experiments (Li et al., 2020; Go et al., 2021). Consistent with previous investigations, we observed that LPS exposure resulted in a significant decrease in the gut microbial alpha-diversity, accompanied by intestinal damage. However, RPAP supplementation increased the gut microbial diversity indices and was positively correlated with its concentration, indicating that RPAP could restore LPS-induced gut microbial dysbiosis. Currently, the decreased gut microbial diversity has been demonstrated to be strongly associated with the progression of multiple chronic diseases such as diabetes, obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (Musso et al., 2011; Yu et al., 2016). As an important biomarker of gut microbial dysbiosis, decreased gut microbial diversity may impair intestinal barrier function and mucosal immune system, causing severe gastrointestinal infection, diarrhea and colonitis (Koh et al., 2015; Jin et al., 2018). Furthermore, gut microbial dysbiosis also cause pathogenic bacteria and toxic metabolites more easily cross the intestinal barrier and extend its adverse effects beyond the gastrointestinal system, causing systemic effects (Sekirov et al., 2010). Gut microbial beta-diversity is also an important tool for assessing gut microbiota. We observed that the individuals of the C group were clustered together but separated from the LPS group, indicating significant changes in the gut microbial main components. However, the gut microbial main components of the RH group were closer to the C group compared with the LPS group, suggesting the improvement in the gut microbial structure.

Consistent with previous investigations, this study also indicated that LPS exposure caused distinct shifts in gut microbial composition and structure, perturbing gut microbial homeostasis. However, RPAP administration can reverse this phenomenon and result in changes in some functional bacteria, such as Alloprevotella, Lactobacillus, Alistipes, Bacillus and Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, which may play vital roles in intestinal ecosystem and health. Alloprevotella has been reported to produce acetic acid and succinic acid, which contributed to maintaining gut microbial homeostasis and decreasing the risk of lifetime cardiovascular disease (Yuan et al., 2021). Numerous investigations revealed that Lactobacillus possessed important biological properties such as secreting antimicrobial substance, improving the intestinal environment, maintaining intestinal microbial homeostasis (Maroju et al., 2021; Stivala et al., 2021). Besides the above-mentioned characteristics, Lactobacillus also contribute to controlling endotoxin, improving immunity, food digestibility and biological potency, indicating its key roles in host growth and health (Gao et al., 2018; Veisi et al., 2022). Alistipes has been demonstrated to be the potential producer of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (Khan et al., 2020). As the acknowledged intestinal beneficial metabolites, SCFAs have been demonstrated to function against pathogens, decreasing oxidative stress, maintaining gut microbial balance, and regulating the intestinal barrier (Elamin et al., 2013; Pekmez et al., 2019). Furthermore, SCFAs also participated in the positive regulation of the host metabolism, cell proliferation and immunological function (Van Rymenant et al., 2017; Menni and Valdes, 2019). Recently published research also demonstrated their crucial roles in lowering cholesterol, alleviating intestinal inflammation, reducing diabetes and angiocardiopathy (Thandapilly et al., 2018). Several studies involving Rikenellaceae have demonstrated its important roles in degrading plant derived polysaccharide and alleviate inflammation. As a common intestinal probiotic, Bacillus is widely used in industry, agriculture and pharmaceutical production. Research indicated that the antibacterial substances produced by Bacillus have broad-spectrum bactericidal activity and have strong bactericidal effects on many food-related bacteria (Jones and Knight, 2012). Moreover, Bacillus could produce beneficial metabolites such as vitamins, showing great potential in alleviating the gut microbial dysbiosis and treating bacterial infections (Li Y. T. et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2021). In this study, we also found that LPS exposure resulted in a significant increase in some pathogenic bacteria such as Klebsiella, Helicobacter and Enterococcus. Klebsiella, a potential intestinal pathogen, is closely related to multiple diseases such as mastitis, pneumonia, septicemia and hysteritis (Bratu et al., 2005). Early surveys indicated that Helicobacter could result in peptic ulcer, gastritis and even lymphoproliferative gastric lymphoma, seriously threatening the host health (Castano-Rodriguez et al., 2017). Notably, some diseases caused by Helicobacter may eventually progress to gastric cancer that is one of the most common malignancies worldwide and causes approximately 160,000 deaths annually in China (Choi et al., 2018). Enterococcus was previously reported to cause life-threatening cardioperiostitis, sepsis and meningitis (Knoll et al., 2013). Moreover, many antibiotics cannot effectively treat Enterococcus infection due to inherent and acquired resistance (Lebreton et al., 2011). Interestingly, RPAP administration reduces the abundance of these potential pathogenic bacteria, which is beneficial to maintain gut microbial homeostasis and protect host health.

Conclusion

In summary, this study investigated the protective effect of RPAP administration on intestinal health and microbiota in LPS-induced mice. Results indicated that RPAP administration could restore LPS-induced intestinal injury and gut microbial dysbiosis and its effect was positively correlated with concentration. This study filled a gap in the effect of RPAP on the intestinal health and microbial homeostasis caused by LPS and demonstrated that the maintenance of gut microbial balance may be one of the important pathways for RPAP to exert its pharmacological effects. Moreover, these findings also expand the understanding of the health benefits of RPAP and provide a theoretical basis for the development of RPAP products to decrease oxidative stress. However, this study also has some limitations including relatively small sample size and lack of intestinal metabolism experiments.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, PRJNA875596.

Ethics statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of Nanjing Agricultural University.

Author contributions

KL and AL provided the research idea. TS, KL, YW, and JD contributed reagents, materials, and analysis tools. AL wrote the manuscript. MI, MK, KW, YL, and FW revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The study was supported by Start-up fund of Nanjing Agricultural University (804131) and Guangxi Science and Technology Project (GuiKeAD22080012, GuiKeAA18242040, and GuiKeZY20198018).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1064657/full#supplementary-material

References

Boursier, J., Mueller, O., Barret, M., Machado, M., Fizanne, L., Araujo-Perez, F., et al. (2016). The severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with gut dysbiosis and shift in the metabolic function of the gut microbiota. Hepatology 63, 764–775. doi: 10.1002/hep.28356

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bratu, S., Landman, D., Haag, R., Recco, R., Eramo, A., Alam, M., et al. (2005). Rapid spread of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in new York City: a new threat to our antibiotic armamentarium. Arch. Intern. Med. 165, 1430–1435. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.12.1430

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caliri, A. W., Tommasi, S., and Besaratinia, A. (2021). Relationships among smoking, oxidative stress, inflammation, macromolecular damage, and cancer. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 787:108365. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108365

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Castano-Rodriguez, N., Kaakoush, N. O., Lee, W. S., and Mitchell, H. M. (2017). Dual role of Helicobacter and Campylobacter species in IBD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 66, 235–249. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310545

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chassaing, B., Koren, O., Goodrich, J. K., Poole, A. C., Srinivasan, S., Ley, R. E., et al. (2015). Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome. Nature 519, 92–96. doi: 10.1038/nature14232

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y. S., Lian, Y. Z., Chen, W. C., Chang, C. C., Tinkov, A. A., Skalny, A. V., et al. (2022). Lycium barbarum polysaccharides and capsaicin inhibit oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, and pain signaling in rats with dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:2423. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, H. L., Xing, X., Zhang, B., Huang, H. B., Shi, C. W., Yang, G. L., et al. (2021). Higher mucosal type II immunity is associated with increased gut microbiota diversity in BALB/c mice after Trichinella spiralis infection. Mol. Immunol. 138, 87–98. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2021.07.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, L., Zhang, S., Wu, S., Ren, Z., Liu, G., and Wu, J. (2021). Synergistic protective effect of Konjac Mannan oligosaccharides and Bacillus subtilis on intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction in Caco-2 cell model and mice model of lipopolysaccharide stimulation. Front. Immunol. 12:696148. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.696148

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chi, Y., Lin, Y., Lu, Y., Huang, Q., Ye, G., and Dong, S. (2019). Gut microbiota dysbiosis correlates with a low-dose PCB126-induced dyslipidemia and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci. Total Environ. 653, 274–282. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.387

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi, I. J., Kook, M. C., Kim, Y. I., Cho, S. J., Lee, J. Y., Kim, C. G., et al. (2018). Helicobacter pylori therapy for the prevention of metachronous gastric cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 1085–1095. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Das, Q., Shay, J., Gauthier, M., Yin, X., Hasted, T. L., Ross, K., et al. (2021). Effects of vaccination against Coccidiosis on gut microbiota and immunity in broiler fed bacitracin and berry Pomace. Front. Immunol. 12:621803. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.621803

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dias, J., Marcondes, M. I., Motta, D. S. S., Cardoso, D. M. E. S., Fontes, N. M., Tassinari, R. R., et al. (2018). Bacterial community dynamics across the gastrointestinal tracts of dairy calves during Preweaning development. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e02675–17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02675-17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elamin, E. E., Masclee, A. A., Dekker, J., Pieters, H. J., and Jonkers, D. M. (2013). Short-chain fatty acids activate AMP-activated protein kinase and ameliorate ethanol-induced intestinal barrier dysfunction in Caco-2 cell monolayers. J. Nutr. 143, 1872–1881. doi: 10.3945/jn.113.179549

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, X., Zhang, M., Li, X., Han, Y., Wu, F., and Liu, Y. (2018). The effects of feeding Lactobacillus pentosus on growth, immunity, and disease resistance in Haliotis discus hannai Ino. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 78, 42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2018.04.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garcia-Mesa, Y., Colie, S., Corpas, R., Cristofol, R., Comellas, F., Nebreda, A. R., et al. (2016). Oxidative stress is a central target for physical exercise neuroprotection against pathological brain aging. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 71, 40–49. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glv005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Go, J., Chang, D. H., Ryu, Y. K., Park, H. Y., Lee, I. B., Noh, J. R., et al. (2021). Human gut microbiota Agathobaculum butyriciproducens improves cognitive impairment in LPS-induced and APP/PS1 mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. Nutr. Res. 86, 96–108. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2020.12.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, H., Liu, Z., Yin, J., Gao, J., He, L., Wang, C., et al. (2021). D-Galactose induces chronic oxidative stress and alters gut microbiota in weaned piglets. Front. Physiol. 12:634283. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.634283

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hao, L., Cheng, Y., Su, W., Wang, C., Lu, Z., Jin, M., et al. (2021). Pediococcus pentosaceus ZJUAF-4 relieves oxidative stress and restores the gut microbiota in diquat-induced intestinal injury. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 105, 1657–1668. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11111-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, J., Nie, Y., Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Fan, Q., et al. (2016). Gradual changes of gut microbiota in weaned miniature piglets. Front. Microbiol. 7:1727. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01727

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiao, J., Wu, J., Zhou, C., Tang, S., Wang, M., and Tan, Z. (2016). Composition of ileal bacterial community in grazing goats varies across non-rumination, transition and rumination stages of life. Front. Microbiol. 07:1364. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, Y., Lu, L., Tu, W., Luo, T., and Fu, Z. (2019). Impacts of polystyrene microplastic on the gut barrier, microbiota and metabolism of mice. Sci. Total Environ. 649, 308–317. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.353

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, C., Xia, J., Wu, S., Tu, W., Pan, Z., Fu, Z., et al. (2018). Insights into a possible influence on gut microbiota and intestinal barrier function during chronic exposure of mice to Imazalil. Toxicol. Sci. 162, 113–123. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx227

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, S. E., and Knight, K. L. (2012). Bacillus subtilis-mediated protection from Citrobacter rodentium-associated enteric disease requires espH and functional flagella. Infect. Immun. 80, 710–719. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05843-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kalinina, E. V., Gavriliuk, L. A., and Pokrovsky, V. S. (2022). Oxidative stress and redox-dependent signaling in prostate cancer. Biochemistry (Mosc) 87, 413–424. doi: 10.1134/S0006297922050030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khan, I., Pathan, S., Li, X. A., Leong, W. K., Liao, W. L., Wong, V., et al. (2020). Far infrared radiation induces changes in gut microbiota and activates GPCRs in mice. J. Adv. Res. 22, 145–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.12.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Knoll, B. M., Hellmann, M., and Kotton, C. N. (2013). Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium meningitis in adults: case series and review of the literature. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 45, 131–139. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2012.717711

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koh, H. W., Kim, M. S., Lee, J. S., Kim, H., and Park, S. J. (2015). Changes in the swine gut microbiota in response to porcine epidemic diarrhea infection. Microbes Environ. 30, 284–287. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME15046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuwano, K., Nakashima, N., Inoshima, I., Hagimoto, N., Fujita, M., Yoshimi, M., et al. (2003). Oxidative stress in lung epithelial cells from patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Eur. Respir. J. 21, 232–240. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00063203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lau, E., Marques, C., Pestana, D., Santoalha, M., Carvalho, D., Freitas, P., et al. (2016). The role of I-FABP as a biomarker of intestinal barrier dysfunction driven by gut microbiota changes in obesity. Nutr. Metab. (Lond.) 13:31. doi: 10.1186/s12986-016-0089-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lebreton, F., Depardieu, F., Bourdon, N., Fines-Guyon, M., Berger, P., Camiade, S., et al. (2011). D-Ala-d-Ser VanN-type transferable vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55, 4606–4612. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00714-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, B., Du, P., Smith, E. E., Wang, S., Jiao, Y., Guo, L., et al. (2019). In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus helveticus KLDS1.8701 for the alleviative effect on oxidative stress. Food Funct. 10, 1707–1717. doi: 10.1039/c8fo01920g

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Li, J., Su, Q., and Liu, Y. (2019). Sinapine reduces non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in mice by modulating the composition of the gut microbiota. Food Funct. 10, 3637–3649. doi: 10.1039/c9fo00195f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, L., Li, R., Zhu, R., Chen, B., Tian, Y., Zhang, H., et al. (2020). Salvianolic acid B prevents body weight gain and regulates gut microbiota and LPS/TLR4 signaling pathway in high-fat diet-induced obese mice. Food Funct. 11, 8743–8756. doi: 10.1039/d0fo01116a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, A., Liu, B., Li, F., He, Y., Wang, L., Fakhar-E-Alam, K. M., et al. (2021a). Integrated bacterial and fungal diversity analysis reveals the gut microbial alterations in diarrheic giraffes. Front. Microbiol. 12:712092. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.712092

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, A., Wang, Y., Hao, J., Wang, L., Quan, L., Duan, K., et al. (2022). Long-term hexavalent chromium exposure disturbs the gut microbial homeostasis of chickens. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 237:113532. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113532

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, A., Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Lv, S., Jin, T., Li, K., et al. (2021b). Microbiome analysis reveals the alterations in gut microbiota in different intestinal segments of Yimeng black goats. Microb. Pathog. 155:104900. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.104900

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y. T., Ye, J. Z., Lv, L. X., Xu, H., Yang, L. Y., Jiang, X. W., et al. (2019). Pretreatment with Bacillus cereus preserves against D-Galactosamine-induced liver injury in a rat model. Front. Microbiol. 10:1751. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01751

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, J., Liu, Y., Yi, J., Li, Y., Li, Q., Li, Y., et al. (2022). Gut microbiota disturbance exaggerates battery wastewater-induced hepatotoxicity through a gut-liver axis. Sci. Total Environ. 809:152188. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152188

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, X., Zhang, W., He, L., Xie, H., Feng, B., Zhu, H., et al. (2021). Understanding the hepatoxicity of inorganic mercury through guts: Perturbance to gut microbiota, alteration of gut-liver axis related metabolites and damage to gut integrity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 225:112791. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112791

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., Wu, C., Han, D., Liu, J., Liu, H., and Jiang, Z. (2019). Partially hydrolyzed guar gum attenuates d-Galactose-induced oxidative stress and restores gut microbiota in rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20:4861. doi: 10.3390/ijms20194861

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Makki, K., Deehan, E. C., Walter, J., and Backhed, F. (2018). The impact of dietary fiber on gut microbiota in host health and disease. Cell Host Microbe 23, 705–715. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maroju, P. A., Tata, P., Balapure, A., Ray, D. J., and Ganesan, R. (2021). Lactobacillus amylovorus derived lipase-mediated silver derivatization over poly(epsilon-caprolactone) towards antimicrobial coatings. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 150:109888. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2021.109888

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maslowski, K. M., Vieira, A. T., Ng, A., Kranich, J., Sierro, F., Yu, D., et al. (2009). Regulation of inflammatory responses by gut microbiota and chemoattractant receptor GPR43. Nature 461, 1282–1286. doi: 10.1038/nature08530

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Menni, C., and Valdes, A. M. (2019). Microbiome genetics links short-chain fatty acids to metabolic diseases. Nat. Metab. 1, 420–421. doi: 10.1038/s42255-019-0056-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Musso, G., Gambino, R., and Cassader, M. (2011). Interactions between gut microbiota and host metabolism predisposing to obesity and diabetes. Annu. Rev. Med. 62, 361–380. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-012510-175505

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pekmez, C. T., Dragsted, L. O., and Brahe, L. K. (2019). Gut microbiota alterations and dietary modulation in childhood malnutrition: the role of short chain fatty acids. Clin. Nutr. 38, 615–630. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.02.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qiao, Y., Sun, J., Ding, Y., Le, G., and Shi, Y. (2013). Alterations of the gut microbiota in high-fat diet mice is strongly linked to oxidative stress. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97, 1689–1697. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4323-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, J., Li, Y., Cai, Z., Li, S., Zhu, J., Zhang, F., et al. (2012). A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490, 55–60. doi: 10.1038/nature11450

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sekirov, I., Russell, S. L., Antunes, L. C., and Finlay, B. B. (2010). Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 90, 859–904. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, A. K., and Vinayak, M. (2017). Resveratrol alleviates inflammatory hyperalgesia by modulation of reactive oxygen species (ros), antioxidant enzymes and erk activation. Inflamm. Res. 66, 911–921. doi: 10.1007/s00011-017-1072-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stivala, A., Carota, G., Fuochi, V., and Furneri, P. M. (2021). Lactobacillus rhamnosus AD3 as a promising alternative for probiotic products. Biomolecules 11:94. doi: 10.3390/biom11010094

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thandapilly, S. J., Ndou, S. P., Wang, Y., Nyachoti, C. M., and Ames, N. P. (2018). Barley beta-glucan increases fecal bile acid excretion and short chain fatty acid levels in mildly hypercholesterolemic individuals. Food Funct. 9, 3092–3096. doi: 10.1039/c8fo00157j

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Rymenant, E., Abranko, L., Tumova, S., Grootaert, C., Van Camp, J., Williamson, G., et al. (2017). Chronic exposure to short-chain fatty acids modulates transport and metabolism of microbiome-derived phenolics in human intestinal cells. J. Nutr. Biochem. 39, 156–168. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2016.09.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Veisi, R. S., Taghdir, M., Abbaszadeh, S., and Hedayati, A. (2022). Dietary effects of probiotic Lactobacillus casei on some immunity indices of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) exposed to cadmium. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. doi: 10.1007/s12011-022-03205-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Xu, Y., Xu, S., Yang, J., Wang, K., and Zhan, X. (2021). Bacillus subtilis DSM29784 alleviates negative effects on growth performance in broilers by improving the intestinal health under necrotic enteritis challenge. Front. Microbiol. 12:723187. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.723187

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wigner, P., Grebowski, R., Bijak, M., Saluk-Bijak, J., and Szemraj, J. (2021). The interplay between oxidative stress, inflammation and angiogenesis in bladder cancer development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:4483. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094483

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wozniak, D., Cichy, W., Przyslawski, J., and Drzymala-Czyz, S. (2021). The role of microbiota and enteroendocrine cells in maintaining homeostasis in the human digestive tract. Adv. Med. Sci. 66, 284–292. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2021.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, Y., Wang, B., Tang, L., Zhou, Y., Wang, Q., Gong, L., et al. (2022). Probiotic bacillus alleviates oxidative stress-induced liver injury by modulating gut-liver Axis in a rat model. Antioxidants (Basel). 11:291. doi: 10.3390/antiox11020291

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, R., Aruhan Xiu, L., Sheng, S., Liang, Y., Zhang, H., Liu, Y., et al. (2019). Exopolysaccharides from Lactobacillus buchneri TCP016 attenuate LPS- and d-GalN-induced liver injury by modulating the gut microbiota. J. Agric. Food Chem. 67, 11627–11637. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b04323

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, J., Zhao, M., Pei, L., Liu, X., Wei, L., Li, A., et al. (2020). Effects of heavy metal mixture exposure on hematological and biomedical parameters mediated by oxidative stress. Sci. Total Environ. 705:134865. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134865

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, W., Zhao, T., and Xiao, H. (2020). The implication of oxidative stress and AMPK-Nrf2 Antioxidative signaling in pneumonia pathogenesis. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 11:400. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00400

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, J., Marsh, S., Hu, J., Feng, W., and Wu, C. (2016). The pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and genetic background. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2016:2862173, 1–13. doi: 10.1155/2016/2862173

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, Y., Lu, L., Bo, N., Chaoyue, Y., and Haiyang, Y. (2021). Allicin ameliorates intestinal barrier damage via microbiota-regulated short-chain fatty acids-TLR4/MyD88/NF-kappaB Cascade response in acrylamide-induced rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 69, 12837–12852. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c05014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yun, B., King, M., Draz, M. S., Kline, T., and Rodriguez-Palacios, A. (2022). Oxidative reactivity across kingdoms in the gut: host immunity, stressed microbiota and oxidized foods. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 178, 97–110. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.11.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, W., Hu, Y., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Guo, D., Gao, C., et al. (2020). Immunoregulation and antioxidant activities of a novel acidic polysaccharide from radix Paeoniae Alba. Glycoconj. J. 37, 361–371. doi: 10.1007/s10719-020-09916-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, J., Tian, F., Yan, S., Zhai, Q., Zhang, H., and Chen, W. (2018). Lactobacillus plantarum CCFM10 alleviating oxidative stress and restoring the gut microbiota in d-galactose-induced aging mice. Food Funct. 9, 917–924. doi: 10.1039/c7fo01574g

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: oxidative stress, radix paeoniae alba polysaccharide, amplicon sequencing, gut microbiota, LPS

Citation: Li A, Ding J, Shen T, Liang Y, Wei F, Wu Y, Iqbal M, Kulyar MF-e-A, Li K and Wei K (2023) Radix paeoniae alba polysaccharide attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced intestinal injury by regulating gut microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 13:1064657. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1064657

Received: 08 October 2022; Accepted: 28 December 2022;
Published: 12 January 2023.

Edited by:

Karolina Skonieczna-Żydecka, Pomeranian Medical University, Poland

Reviewed by:

Karolina Jakubczyk, Pomeranian Medical University, Poland
Prerona Boruah, DY Patil Deemed to be University, India

Copyright © 2023 Li, Ding, Shen, Liang, Wei, Wu, Iqbal, Kulyar, Li and Wei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Kunhua Wei, ✉ divinekh@163.com; Kun Li, ✉ lik2014@sina.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.