Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Microbiol., 31 October 2022
Sec. Microbiotechnology
This article is part of the Research Topic Insights in Microbiotechnology: 2021 View all 9 articles

Editorial: Insights in microbiotechnology-2021

  • 1Metagenomics and Secretomics Research Laboratory, Department of Botany, Dr. Harisingh Gour University (A Central University), Sagar, India
  • 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, United States
  • 3Institute of Bioresource and Agriculture, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • 4Oil & Gas Research Center, Central Analytical and Applied Research Unit, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman

Editorial on the Research Topic
Insights in microbiotechnology-2021

The field of Microbiotechnology has witnessed a significant transition in the last few decades owing to the vast and speedy development of cutting-edge microbial and Omics techniques (Chandran et al., 2020; Kumar and Dubey, 2020). However, Microbiotechnology gained popularity when industrial-scale demands for microbially produced goods led to the new species discovery, the choice of better-known strains, and eventually the introduction of foreign genes to obtain expressed products, novel functional traits, or to increase the strain's capacity and tolerance for product accumulations (Riley and Guss, 2021). Microbiotechnology covers main areas including Food, Agricultural, Chemical and Fuel, Environmental, Medical, and Materials technology (Vitorino and Bessa, 2017). Numerous Microbiotechnological studies have fundamentally altered our knowledge of microbial diversity, evolutionary biology, and molecular microbial interactions with plants, animals, and other organisms (Prasad et al., 2021). The study of natural microorganisms enabled by genomics may help to better understand the genesis, growth, development, and interactions between the biosphere and the environment (Nayfach et al., 2021; Malla et al., 2022). The development of Microbiotechnology sheds light on the numerous microorganisms that have been investigated and used in the creation of various applications, including plant protection and improvement, environmental cleanup, and the enhancement of plant and human health.

Through this call for paper on Insights in Microbiotechnology-2021 in the journal of Front. Microbiol., we invited reviews, mini-reviews, perspectives, and opinions summarizing the field's current state and future directions. This subject focuses on the most significant scientific discoveries, breakthroughs, problems, advancements, and prospects in the area of Microbiotechnology during the year 2021.

Eight articles were published on this Research Topic authored by 44 experts from all over the globe in the Microbiotechnology section of Frontiers in Microbiology. The main goal of these articles is to cover the latest development in the different areas of microbiotechnology. Out of eight articles, four reviews, one opinion, one mini-review, one perspective, and one research article were published. All the articles published were viewed more than 11,200 times. These articles cover different aspects and the latest development in microbiotechnology. The first article in this issue by Raj et al. focused on the application of microbial biosurfactants in bioremediation of pesticides, an environmental friendly method for long-term sustainability. Here authors addressed the function of several biosurfactants produced by the microbes in enhancing pesticide cleanup as well as various techniques ranging from destructive/non-destructive for their detection. This article also discusses how sophisticated metagenomics technologies may be used to profile the bacteria that break down pesticides and produce biosurfactants in various settings. In an opinion paper, Chen and Wang suggested the use of microalgae-based green bio-manufacturing to make a range of biofuels and fine chemicals by genetic engineering modification, namely the gene/genome editing technology, and to generate a number of metabolites through diverse metabolic pathways. Current materials science and synthetic biology techniques for biofilm management were outlined by Shi et al. in order to better manage bacteria and biofilms, the evaluation suggested a viable research area for the future. Núñez et al. evaluated the most recent development in the control of alginate synthesis in a bacterial model system using Azotobacter vinelandii as an example. The possibility of producing alginates utilizing bacterial production methods, such as those based on Azotobacter vinelandii, was discussed. Zhou et al. presented the idea of a microbial electron transfer network in a viewpoint that further illustrated “species-to-species” connections and discussed various important issues ranging from cellular alteration to microbiome formation. In another article by Vita et al. the bacterial populations in biofilms developing on particles had an improved ability for oil breakdown. The review paper by Roy et al. explored recent findings in direct and indirect electron transfer phenomena that have been revealed by a variety of proteomic, genomic and genetic approaches. Recent developments and publications on synthetic biology and genetic engineering that explore the direct and indirect electron transfer phenomena have been highlighted. Cabugao et al. reviewed the role of popular analytical and omics techniques in understanding the microbial transformation of natural organic matter and its impacts on global carbon cycle. In this way this Research Topic on Microbiotechnology covers various hot topics and latest development in the field that established the ground of future state of the art research in this domain.

Author contributions

AK prepared the draft version of this Editorial note and all Guest Associate Editors agreed on the final version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

We express gratitude to the Editorial board members and esteemed reviewers of Frontiers in Microbiology for giving us the chance to choose the Research Topic, as well as to all the authors for their efforts.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Chandran, H., Meena, M., and Sharma, K. (2020). Microbial biodiversity and bioremediation assessment through omics approaches. Front. Environ. Chemist 1, 570326. doi: 10.3389/fenvc.2020.570326

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, A., and Dubey, A. (2020). Rhizosphere microbiome: Engineering bacterial competitiveness for enhancing crop production. J. Adv. Res. 24, 337–352. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.04.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malla, M. A., Dubey, A., Raj, A., Kumar, A., Upadhyay, N., and Yadav, S. (2022). Emerging frontiers in microbe mediated pesticide remediation: Unveiling role of omics and In silico approaches in engineered environment. Environmental Pollution 299, 118851. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118851

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nayfach, S., Roux, S., Seshadri, R., Udwary, D., Varghese, N., Schulz, F., and Eloe-Fadrosh, E. A. (2021). A genomic catalog of Earth's microbiomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 499–509. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0718-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prasad, R., Kumar, V., Singh, J., and Upadhyaya, C. P. (2021). Recent Developments in Microbial Technologies. Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-4439-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Riley, L. A., and Guss, A. M. (2021). Approaches to genetic tool development for rapid domestication of non-model microorganisms. Biotechnol. Biofuels 14, 1–17. doi: 10.1186/s13068-020-01872-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vitorino, L. C., and Bessa, L. A. (2017). Technological microbiology: development and applications. Front. Microbiol. 8, 827. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00827

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: metagenomics, microbiome, biofilm, microbial diversity, omics

Citation: Kumar A, Karthikeyan OP and Joshi SJ (2022) Editorial: Insights in microbiotechnology-2021. Front. Microbiol. 13:1059702. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1059702

Received: 01 October 2022; Accepted: 20 October 2022;
Published: 31 October 2022.

Edited and reviewed by: William James Hickey, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States

Copyright © 2022 Kumar, Karthikeyan and Joshi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ashwani Kumar, ashwaniiitd@hotmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.