Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 11 November 2022
Sec. Food Microbiology

Diversity and temporal dynamics of breast milk microbiome and its influencing factors in Chinese women during the first 6 months postpartum

Bin Liu,Bin Liu1,2Junying Zhao,Junying Zhao1,2Yanpin Liu,Yanpin Liu1,2Weicang Qiao,Weicang Qiao1,2Tiemin JiangTiemin Jiang3Lijun Chen,
Lijun Chen1,2*
  • 1National Engineering Research Center of Dairy Health for Maternal and Child, Beijing Sanyuan Foods Co. Ltd., Beijing, China
  • 2Beijing Engineering Research Center of Dairy, Beijing Technical Innovation Center of Human Milk Research, Beijing Sanyuan Foods Co. Ltd., Beijing, China
  • 3South Asia Branch of National Engineering Center of Dairy Health for Maternal and Child, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, China

Human breast milk (HBM) plays an important role in providing nutrients, beneficial microorganisms and bioactive components for infants, helping maturation of their immune system and gastrointestinal development. Here, we present a study aiming to investigate the diversity and temporal dynamics of the milk microbiome across the first 6 month postpartum in Chinese healthy breastfeeding women, and to investigate to what extent other variables (e.g., sampling location, infant sex, and mode of delivery) might also be related to variations in the human milk microbiome, and the association with maternal diet and nutrients. Fifty-three healthy pregnant women from four cities were recruited from a China Maternal and Infant Health Cohort Study and breast milk samples were collected and analyzed using 16S rRNA metagenomic sequencing. We illustrated the diversity and temporal dynamics during lactation (Adonis p-value = 3e–04). Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were the most abundant phyla, and Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Serratia, and Corynebacterium were the core genera. Partitioning around medoids clustering identified two major internal clusters of breast milk microbiota. Cluster 1 was dominated by Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas, while Cluster 2 was dominated by Streptococcus and Staphylococcus. Among other environmental variables, sampling location showed significant influence on breast milk microbiome (Adonis p-value = 4e–04), while infant sex (Adonis p-value = 0.33) and mode of delivery (Adonis p-value = 0.19) were less related to variations in the human milk microbiome. Maternal diet such as tuber was significantly correlated with the relative abundance of Neisseria (rho = 0.34, adjusted p-value = 0.01) and Cutibacterium (rho = −0.35, adjusted p-value = 0.01), and nutrients such as carbohydrates were significantly correlated with the relative abundance of Aquabacterium (rho = −0.39, adjusted p-value = 0.0027), and vitamin B12 was significantly correlated with the relative abundance of Coprococcus (rho = 0.40, adjusted p-value = 0.0018), etc. These results illustrated the dynamic changes of composition and diversity during the lactation phases of the Chinese breast milk microbiome and addressed the importance of geographic location on milk microbiota, and associations with maternal diet consumption, which have potential benefits on the establishment and future health of breastfeeding infants.

Introduction

Human breast milk (HBM) is recognized as the optimal and exclusive source of nutrients for infants in the first 6 months of life since it contains simple sugars, lipids, proteins, and many other bioactive components including oligosaccharides, enzymes, cytokines, antibodies, and hormones, which nourish infants and protect them from disease while their own immune system matures (Mastromarino et al., 2014; Li et al., 2017). Breastfeeding protects the infant against infectious diseases such as diarrhea or pneumonia in early life and also has many long-term benefits to the prevention of chronic diseases including allergic diseases, obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease in future life (Binns et al., 2016; Gertosio et al., 2016). HBM provides a great many of beneficial microorganisms that are critical to colonize the mucosal system (including intestinal mucosa) of infant and thereafter contribute to the development and functionality of innate and adaptive immune responses and regulate intestinal barrier homeostasis and nutrient absorption (Hooper and Macpherson, 2010; Mastromarino et al., 2014; Ojo-Okunola and Nicol, 2018). Results of several studies have shown the beneficial effects of commensal bacteria in HBM on the newborn infants (Heikkila and Saris, 2003; Pérez-Cano et al., 2010; Pannaraj et al., 2017; Biagi et al., 2018).

The presence of bacteria in HBM as a result of natural selection has made it uniquely appropriate for nourish infants (Goldman, 2012). About 103–105 cfu/ml viable bacteria were identified in HBM from healthy women by using culture-dependent method (Perez et al., 2007), and an infant who consuming an average of 800 ml/day HBM has been reported to intake 104–106 commensal bacteria (Heikkila and Saris, 2003). Culture-dependent methods have long shown the predominance of the lactic acid bacteria including species of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium (Martín et al., 2003), whose productions would improve the health of gastrointestinal tract through limiting the growth of potential pathogenic organisms. More recently, a more complex bacterial community were detected by using culture-independent DNA-based techniques such as next-generation sequencing, including Bifidobacterium spp., Bacteroides spp., and members of the Clostridia class (Hunt et al., 2011; Fouhy et al., 2012). The most abundant phyla were found to be Firmicutes and Proteobacteria (Cabrera-Rubio et al., 2016; Kumar et al., 2016), and Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Serratia, and Corynebacterium, as the members of dominant “core” bacterial genera which were reported to be less influenced by the environmental factors (Hunt et al., 2011). However, various studies have reported differences in this “core” bacterial genera in different countries by using different subjects, sample collection, and detection methods (Hunt et al., 2011; Urbaniak et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017).

Various studies have confirmed that nutritional component in HBM varied across different stages of lactation period accompanying with the change of physiological, hormonal, and pathological conditions of breastfeeding women, especially for colostrum and transitional milk (Jiang et al., 2016; Xue et al., 2017; Bai et al., 2018). However, it was controversial that the variation of microbiota in HBM was associated with lactation stages (Cabrera-Rubio et al., 2012; Khodayar-Pardo et al., 2014; Sakwinska et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017), possibly due to lack of enough high-quality samples with reasonable sampling time points from cohort study. Additionally, many other factors have been shown to be associated with the differences of bacteria in HBM, including delivery mode (Cabrera-Rubio et al., 2012; Khodayar-Pardo et al., 2014; Cabrera-Rubio et al., 2016), gestational age (Khodayar-Pardo et al., 2014), maternal weight (Cabrera-Rubio et al., 2012; Collado et al., 2012), maternal health [allergy (Grönlund et al., 2007), celiac disease (Olivares et al., 2015), or HIV (González et al., 2013)], geographical location (Kumar et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017), and usage of antibiotic (Soto et al., 2014). Breast milk fatty acids and minerals (Ca and Mg) appeared to influence microbial composition of HBM (Sanjulián et al., 2021). Cabrera-Rubio et al. (2016) found that milk microbiome from mothers with vaginal delivery clearly separated from those with C-section, and milk from obese women showed a different and less diverse microbiota when comparing with milk from normal-weight women. However, the association of pregestational BMI and gestational weight gain (GWG) with bacterial community in HBM has been little investigated.

We hypothesized that the change of physiological or hormonal triggers during lactating period which influenced breast milk components may also support different bacterial genera. This prospective, observational cohort study was designed primarily to evaluate the diversity and temporal dynamics of the milk microbiome across the first 6 month postpartum in Chinese healthy breastfeeding women. Second, we investigated to what extent other variables (e.g., sampling location, maternal age, pregestational BMI, gestational weight gain, maternal diet, infant sex, and delivery mode) might also be related to variations in the human milk microbiome.

Materials and methods

Study population

A representative subset of 53 mother was selected from China maternal and infant nutrition health cohort study (MINC), a prospective cohort study focuses on the effect of early life nutrition and diet on the short- and long-term health of infants in China (Jiang et al., 2018). Health pregnant women with the age of 18–40 were enrolled between 2014 and 2017 (n = 962) and remained eligible if they delivered a healthy term infant (37–40 weeks gestation) with a birth weight range from 2,500 to 4,000 g appropriate for gestational age (n = 648). In the current study, we selected a representative subset of 53 mothers with available milk samples at least three sampling location, ensuring equal representation across the 5 phases of 0–6 months. The study was approved by Ethics Committee of Beijing Ditan Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University (#2015-027-01), and informed written consent was obtained from all mothers.

Human breast milk sample collection

A total of 204 human breast milk samples were obtained from 53 healthy lactating women (mean age 29.8 ± 3.7, range 22–38). The sample numbers collected from each city and lactation phase are shown in Table 1. Breast milk sampling was standardized for all subjects, and was performed in a dim light room in hospitals without direct sunlight exposure. An electric pump (Horigen HNR/X-2108ZB, Xinhe Electrical Apparatuses Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China) was used to collect the milk. Breasts of the subjects were emptied by the mother herself between 6 and 7 a.m. After the mothers had breakfast (7–8 am), the samples were collected at the second feeding in the morning (9–11 am) to avoid circadian influence on the outcomes. A single full breast was emptied by trained investigators into a new feeding bottle. We attempted to collect the milk from the same (right) breast, but milk was also collected from the left side when a steady stream of milk was not possible for some mothers. After gently up–down shaking for ~ 10 times, an aliquot of 10 ml was secured for characterization purposes. The rest of the milk was returned to the mother for feeding to the infant. Each sample was distributed in 5 ml clear polypropylene tubes under the dim light on ice, labeled with subject information, and stored at −80°C. Once producing, the HBM samples were delivered to the laboratory immediately to ensure that all of them would arrive at the laboratory within one or 2 days after collection, and then stored at −80°C until DNA extraction. HBM samples were collected at 0–5 days (colostrum), 12–14 days (transitional milk), 1, 4, and 6 months after delivery (defined as different phases range from S1 to S5). The information of those lactating women was collected including age, height, pregestational weight, prepartum weight, and postpartum weight. Additionally, mode of delivery, pregnancy weeks, sex, and birth weight of infants were recorded when delivery.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Sample numbers of human breast milk by city and lactation phase.

Diets and nutritional components

Maternal 3-day-diet (before collection of breast milk samples) was recorded using a 32-diet-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) as described in Zhang et al. (2021). Diet intake, such as tuber, vegetable, fruit, meat, fish, egg, milk, soy, oil, and nutritional components, such as energy (Kcal), protein (g), fat (g), carbohydrates (g), fiber (g), cholesterol (mg), vitamin A, vitamin B1, vitamin B2, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, folate (vitamin B9), niacin (vitamin B3), vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E, calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), ion (Fe), zinc (Zn), selenium (Se), cuprum (Cu), manganese (Mn), and iodine (I), were analyzed according to Chinese Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) using Nutrition Calculator v2.7.3.12.1

High throughput 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from 5 ml of homogenized milk samples and reagent control samples using the QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, GmbH, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR amplification of the V3–V4 region of 16S rRNA genes (primers 341F: CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG and 805R: GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC) was performed with 10 ng DNA as a template, using 15 μl of Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs), 0.2 μM of forward and reverse primers in a 30 μl total reaction volume. The PCR program included 3 min at 95°C, 25 cycles of 30 s at 95°C and 30 s at 55°C, and then 30 s at 72°C. Sequencing libraries were generated using NEB Next Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, United States) following manufacturer’s recommendations. Reagent control samples were failed to pass library quality check due to insufficient DNA concentration. Amplicons were sequenced using 2 × 250 bp paired-end by Illumina HiSeq 2500 according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Breast milk microbiome data analysis was performed using USEARCH (version 11.0.667; Edgar, 2010) and VSEARCH (version 2.22.1; Rognes et al., 2016), the demultiplexed raw paired-end reads were quality filtered, clustered, and removed chimeras. The operational taxonomic units (OTU) was generated with 97% similarity cutoff, and then the taxonomy ranks were assigned to the representative sequences using the RDP 16S rRNA training set (Version 18, latest release on 2020-August-14; Wang et al., 2007), which includes the reclassification of the genus Lactobacillus into 25 genera (Zheng et al., 2020) and other taxonomy updates.

Statistical analysis

Species diversity

α-diversity indexes (Chao1 and Shannon) were calculated at OTU level using Vegan package in R based on the OTU level abundance profile. Differences of α-diversity indexes were tested using Wilcoxon Rank sum test. Phylogenetic measures of β-diversity based on the genus level abundance profile were also calculated by using Vegan package and Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) plot analysis was displayed by WGCNA package, stat packages, and ggplot2 package in R software. We used Adonis of Bray–Curtis distances to compare the microbiota community structure across phases and groups. Differential abundance of genera and phyla was tested by Wilcoxon rank sum test, and p values were corrected for multiple testing with the Benjamin & Hochberg method. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of effect size (LEfSe) was applied to determine the most discriminant taxa among phases and cities (LDA score ≥ 4.0 and p value < 0.05) using microeco package (Liu et al., 2021) in R. R software (Version 4.2.1) which was used for plotting and statistical analysis throughout.

Results

Description of cohort

A total of 204 human milk samples from 3 to 5 days (n = 39), 13–15 days (n = 44), 1 month (n = 51), 4 months (n = 39), and 6 months (n = 31) after delivery were obtained from 53 mothers selected in this cohort study. The average age of subjects was 29.8 ± 3.7 years (range 22–38 years) and the mean pregestational BMI was 21.2 ± 2.9 kg/m2 (range 16.7–27.4 kg/m2). According to the recommendation by Institute of Medicine, 44 (83.0%), 8 (15.1%), and 1 (1.9%) participants had insufficient, appropriate, and excessive gestational weight gain (GWG), respectively. The mean birth weight of their infants was 3514.5 ± 470.7 (range 2,500–4,700 g) and the mean birth body length was 50.7 ± 1.5 cm (range 46–54 cm). Twenty-eight (52.8%) infants were male and 33 (62.3%) infants were delivered by natural childbirth. The detailed information of the participants’ and their infants’ characteristics are displayed in Table 2.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Baseline characteristics of participants and infants (n = 53).

Microbiota diversity and composition varied by sampling time

A total of 13,718,055 high-quality filtered reads were obtained, and the reads were clustered into 1,377 OTUs. The OTUs were then assigned to known taxa (27 phyla, 49 classes, 81 orders, 150 families, and 293 genera). The 4 predominant phyla detected were Proteobacteria (52.3%), Firmicutes (38.4%), Bacteroidetes (5.2%), and Actinobacteria (3.5%), and the component ratio of phyla in each stage is shown in Figure 1A. The abundance of Bacteroidetes was significantly lower in the samples at stage 2 compared with the other phases (all p-value < 0.05; Figures 1B). α-diversity (Shannon index) of human milk microbiome at stage 2 was significantly lower than stages 1, 4, and 5 (all p-value < 0.05; Figures 1C). PCoA based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity at genus level was performed to identify the association of microbial composition in different lactation phases (Figure 1D). PC1 and PC2 explained 44.9% of the variance. PC1 was enriched with Acinetobacter, Streptococcus, and Staphylococcus, whereas PC2 was enriched with Pseudomonas. The box plots in Figure 1E showed that samples from different phases were allocated in the PC2-postive region (p-value < 0.05 for stage 1 vs. stage 5). β-diversity distances of different phases were compared, and we found that microbial community structure of samples at stage 1 was significantly varied from other phases (Adonis p-value < 0.05), and stage 2 was significantly varied from stage 4 and 5 (Adonis p-value < 0.01). We also explored the association of the 20 most predominant bacterial genera with lactation phases, and found that the relative abundances of predominant genera, such as Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, Gemella, Rothia, Rhizobium, and Brevundimonas were significantly varied with lactation phases (all adjusted p-value < 0.05, Figure 1F). Among them, there was a significant decrease in abundance of Staphylococcus and Gemella along with lactating stage, while an increase in Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas (Figure 1F). Other predominant genera such as Acinetobacter, Streptococcus, Enterobacteriaceae, Enhydrobacter, Serratia, Chryseobacterium, Bacteroides, Enterococcus, Sphingobacterium, Faecalibacterium, Prevotella, and Corynebacterium showed no significant change in different lactation phases (adjusted p-value > 0.05).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Microbiota diversity and composition varied by lactation phase. (A), the relative abundance of phyla in each phase. (B), statistical analysis of Bacteroidetes from each phase. (C), difference of Shannon index of samples from all phases. (D), principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) using relative abundance data at genus level. (E), five predominant genera in the 203 breast milk samples. The most abundant bacterial genera are indicated by arrows and genus names. Two principal components (PC1 and PC2) were showed. Boxplots showed the variance of microbial abundance at each stage. (F), boxplot of the top 7 species from all phases and MetaStat by permutation test [p value was the adjusted result of Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate (BH FDR)]. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

The clusters identified in human milk and their association with characteristics of lactating women

We figured out the taxonomic clustering of samples by PCoA and the partitioning around medoids (PAM) clustering at the genus level, and the optimum cluster number was two, which was identified based on the Calinski–Harabasz (CH) index (Figure 2A). Our results showed that Cluster 1 was driven by the genera Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas (p < 0.05), and Cluster 2 was driven by the genera Streptococcus and Staphylococcus (p < 0.05, Figure 2B). Among the 20 predominant genera, the relative abundances of Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas were significantly higher in Cluster 1 than those in Cluster 2 (all adjusted p-value < 0.05), whereas the abundances of Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Rothia, and Gemella in Cluster 2 were significantly higher than those in Cluster 1 (all adjusted p-value < 0.01; Figures 2C). We further analyzed the enrichment of clusters in each stage and found that the percentage of Cluster 2 was decreased along with lactation phases, and the percentage of Cluster 2 at stage 1 was significantly higher than it at stage 3 or 5 (both p-value < 0.05, Figure 2D).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Partitioning around medoids (PAM) clustering and analysis of milk microbiome at different lactation phases. (A), Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) on the relative abundance data of clusters at different lactation phases. (B), distribution of the top 15 predominant genera in two clusters. (C), boxplot of the top 4 species from two clusters and MetaStat by permutation test [p value was the adjusted result of Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate (BH FDR)]. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (D), percentage of two clusters at lactation phases.

Microbiota difference among cities

The 204 human milk samples were obtained from 53 healthy lactating mothers living in four cities of Beijing, Luoyang of Henan province, Liuyang of Hunan province, and Tangshan of Hebei province. No significant differences were found in mothers’ age or BMI, and in baby gender among the regions. For delivery mode, no significant differences were observed among Beijing, Luoyang, and Liuyang, which was significantly different from Tangshan with vaginal delivery only.

The species diversity analysis of milk microbiota from different cities showed that α-diversity (Coverage index) significantly differed among Beijing, Liuyang and Luoyang, and also differed between Tangshan and Luoyang (Wilcoxon rank-sum test; Figure 3A). We further compared the microbiota community structure based on the Bray–Curtis distances by Adonis analysis, founding no significant difference among the Northern cities of Beijing, Luoyang, and Tangshan, but significantly different from southern city of Liuyang (p-value < 0.05). This difference could be associated with the most discriminant taxa determined by LEfSe analysis, such as Phylum of Proteobacteria, Class of Gammaproteobacteria, and Genus of Acinetobacter riched in samples from Tangshan, genus Elizabethkingia riched in those from Beijing, and Phylum of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria, genus of Streptococcus, Rothia, and so on riched in Liuyang, and Phylum of Proteobacteria, Class of Bacteroidales riched in Luoyang (Figures 3B,C). Other factors such as gender of infant (Adonis p-value = 0.33) and delivery methods (Adonis p-value = 0.19) showed limited influence on human milk microbiome.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Comparison of milk microbial composition in different cities. (A), α-diversity (observed species) based on the OTUs in Beijing (B), Luoyang (L), Liuyang (H), and Tangshan (T). LEfSe barplot (B) and cladogram (C) of LDA value for Taxa with significant difference (LDA Score > 4, p < 0.05) between among cities. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (D), association heatmap of maternal diet and nutritional components with microbiome of breast milk, diet intake such as tuber, vegetable, fruit, meat, fish, egg, milk, soy, oil, and nutritional components such as energy (Kcal), protein (G), fat (g), carbohydrates (g), fiber (g), cholesterol (mg), vitamin A, vitamin B1, vitamin B2, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, folate (vitamin B9), nacin (vitamin B3), vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E, calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), potassium(K), sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), ion (Fe), zinc (Zn), selenium (Se), cuprum (Cu), manganese (Mn) and iodine (I). Color of cell stands for Spearman’s correlation coefficients. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Association of maternal diet and milk components with microbiome of breast milk

Spearman correlations of human milk microbes with thirty-two maternal diet components and other factors (infant sex and delivery mode) were performed.. For diet intake, Neisseria and Cutibacterium were significantly correlated with tuber (rho = 0.34, adjusted p-value = 0.01; rho = −0.35, adjusted p-value = 0.01, separately); for nutrients, Aquabacterium was significantly correlated with carbohydrates (rho = −0.39, adjusted p-value = 0.0027), and Tepidimonas was significantly correlated with fish (rho = 0.34, adjusted p-value = 0.029), Coprococcus was significantly correlated with vitamin B12 (rho = 0.40, adjusted p-value = 0.0018), Methylorubrum was significantly correlated with Ca (rho = −0.32, adjusted p-value = 0.049), and Aquabacterium was significantly correlated with Mn (rho = −0.34, adjusted p-value = 0.024). Also, Clostridium sensu stricto was significantly correlated with delivery method (rho = −0.30, adjusted p-value = 0.039). Other diets and nutrients showed no significant correlation with milk microbial genera (adjusted p-value>0.05; Figure 3D).

Discussion

Human breast milk (HBM) is known as the fundamental origin of nutrition including bacteria for neonate in the first 6 months of life that nourish infants gastrointestinal and immune development and protect them from diseases (Mastromarino et al., 2014; Li et al., 2017) and regulate intestinal barrier homeostasis and nutrient absorption (Hooper and Macpherson, 2010; Mastromarino et al., 2014; Ojo-Okunola and Nicol, 2018). Although various studies have confirmed that nutritional component in HBM varied across different phases of lactation period accompanying with the change of physiological, hormonal, and pathological conditions of breastfeeding women, especially for colostrum and transitional milk (Jiang et al., 2016; Xue et al., 2017; Bai et al., 2018), it was still controversial that the variation of microbiota in HBM was associated with lactation phases and other environmental factors (Cabrera-Rubio et al., 2012; Khodayar-Pardo et al., 2014; Sakwinska et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017).

Using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing technology to investigate the microbiome of human milk across the first 6 month postpartum in Chinese healthy breastfeeding women in this prospective, observational cohort study, we illustrated the diversity and temporal dynamics of the human milk microbiome, and also found that environmental factors (lactation phase and city) were related with the microbial variations. These results provide new information about human breast milk microbiome and its impact factors, and provide potential aspects of modulate milk microbiome composition.

Predominant bacterial phyla and genera were consistent with published results (Hunt et al., 2011; Cabrera-Rubio et al., 2016; Kumar et al., 2016), as they found that the most abundant phyla were Firmicutes and Proteobacteria (Wan et al., 2020), and core genera (less affected by the environmental factors) such as Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Serratia, and Corynebacterium. However, various studies reported different “core” genera from different countries with different individuals, sampling methods, and test methods (Hunt et al., 2011; Urbaniak et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017). Predominant genera Staphylococcus showed high relative abundance in early lactation phases, and then decreased, which is consistent with previous studies (Urbaniak et al., 2016; Wan et al., 2020), and this may associated with early colonization of breastfeeding neonatal gut microbiota. Using PAM clustering algorithm to illustrate internal patterns of breast milk microbiota, we identified two major clusters. Cluster 1 was dominated by Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas, while Cluster 2 was dominated by Streptococcus and Staphylococcus. The percentage of Cluster 1 was decreased during lactation phases could confirm the belief that the microbes of HBM may meet the requirements of the infant in each lactation stage. Previous study showed that there were three clusters in milk microbiota of Chinese women, and the major key bacterial families were Streptococcaceae (abundance in Cluster 2, 48.5%), Staphylococcaceae (abundance in Cluster 1, 42.1%), and Pseudomonadaceae (abundance in Cluster 3, 26.5%)(Li et al., 2017). Moossavi et al. (2019) found four main clusters in the milk microbial community, and C1 was dominated by Enterobacteriaceae, Moraxellaceae, and Pseudomonadaceae, while C2 was dominated by Streptococcaceae and Staphylococcaceae, which may partially be influenced by transit from oral to exogenous bacteria. Differences of cluster number in different studies may due to varied parameters of clustering methods, breast milk collection methods and geographic diet and life style variations. Lactation stage has been recognized as a factor influencing breast milk microbes (Cabrera-Rubio et al., 2012), and it has been shown that specific breast milk microbial genera such as Staphylococcus, Streptococcus and other microbes could be transmitted to infants and beneficial for the infant gut (Benito et al., 2015; Fehr et al., 2020). This could reinforce the belief that the microbes of HBM may affect the infant’s early intestinal colonization and meet the requirements for the infant in each lactation period.

As reported previously, environmental variables (e.g., sampling location, infant sex, and delivery mode) were related with variations in the human milk microbiota (Cabrera-Rubio et al., 2012; Sakwinska et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017). Sample geographic location, which influences the long-term maternal dietary choices and other lifestyles, is reported as one of the factor that can influence microbiota of human breast milk. Milk microbiota was highly geographical location specific, as Lactobacillus was high in Northwest and North China, and Lactobacillus reuteri was high in Tibet and Gansu provinces (Ding et al., 2019). Other study also showed that lactation phase was the predominant factor in dynamic changes of milk microbiome (Sanjulián et al., 2021), but delivery mode does not influence microbial changes of human milk during lactation (Lyons et al., 2022).

Microbial composition and diversity of milk were related with other maternal factors, such as BMI, parity, delivery mode, and infant sex, and especially, breastfeeding practices were identified as the key determinant of milk microbiota composition (Moossavi et al., 2019). The number of unique OTUs was significantly greater in the breast milk from Cesarean section group than from vaginal delivery group (Li et al., 2017), and microbiome of breast milk from elective cesarean delivery showed a significant compositional change compared with vaginal delivery and nonelective cesarean delivery (Cabrera-Rubio et al., 2012). In this cohort study, adonis analysis showed that lactation stage was the major factor, followed by sampling sites; other factors such as gender of infants and delivery methods showed limited influence on human milk microbiota. Studies have shown that other factors such as maternal diet and nutrients of HBM can also modulate and shape the microbial composition and diversity of breast milk (Mazurier et al., 2017; Cortes-Macías et al., 2021).

Diet provides nutritional components to breast milk, and it is recognized as one of the major factors that could influence breast milk microbiome, as reported by several studies (Ferraris et al., 2020; Redondo-Useros et al., 2020; Sanjulián et al., 2021). In this study, tuber consumption in diet was significantly correlated with Neisseria and Cutibacterium. Neisseria was reported to be related with infectious diseases (Wang and Donovan, 2015); Cutibacterium, which was sourced from the skin, was found a higher relative abundance in Spain, while Aquabacterium, who was significantly correlated with carbohydrates consumption in diet, was reported as a differential genera that was higher in Burundi (Kumar et al., 2016; Drago et al., 2017), and could transfer to breast milk and then to the infant gut (Jost et al., 2014; Zimmermann and Curtis, 2020). According to Yang et al. (2020), carbohydrates, especially dietary fibers, were related with increase of several health beneficial gut microbes, such as Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium, Lactobacillus, and Akkermansia, etc. Coprococcus, who was significantly correlated with diet vitamin B12 consumption, was reported to be vertically transmitted from mother to infant (Asnicar et al., 2017). Several micronutrients, such as vitamins and minerals, were also related with a healthy gut microbiome in appropriate supplements (Yang et al., 2020). Apart from diet in this study, gut microbial genera Clostridium sensu stricto was significantly correlated with delivery methods, which previously showed higher abundance in full-term caesarean section group compared to full-term spontaneous vaginally delivered group at first week after born in infant gut (Hill et al., 2017).

Although reagent controls were tested, other reference or mock community were not included in our library preparation and sequencing pipeline, as suggested by previous review (Hornung et al., 2019), so we cannot rule out potential contaminants. Also, shotgun metagenomic sequencing is needed to illustrate the strain level and biological functions of gut microbes, and culturing experiments, especially culture of probiotics in human breast milk, are required to fully reveal the existence and biological characteristics of them.

Conclusion

In this prospective, observational cohort study, we have used 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing technology to investigate the microbiota of human milk across the first 6 month postpartum in Chinese healthy breastfeeding women. Our results showed the diversity and temporal dynamics of human milk during lactation, and environmental variables such as lactation stage and sampling location are major influencing factors in the human milk microbiome, and the association with maternal diet and nutrients. Further studies are needed to illustrate how breast milk microbiome impact establishment and maturation of infant’s gut microbiome and future health.

Data availability statement

The data presented in the study are deposited in the Figshare repository, DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21399117.v1.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee of Beijing Ditan Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University (#2015-027-01). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

LC designed research. JZ conducted research, recruited and visit subjects. BL performed statistical analysis and wrote paper. YL collected samples and performed data acquisition. TJ conducted research. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32072191), National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFD2100700), Guangxi Science and Technology Project (AD20297088), Daxing District Major Scientific and Technological Achievements Transformation Project (Grant No. 2020006), and Beijing Science and Technology Plan (Grant No. Z201100002620005).

Acknowledgments

We thank the volunteers participating in this study for their trust. We also thank the study team members for their involvement in this work, especially nurses and coordinators. We thank Yong Xue (College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University) for valuable advices on preparation of manuscript.

Conflict of interest

BL, JZ, YL, WQ, and LC were employed by the company Beijing Sanyuan Foods Co. Ltd.

The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

References

Asnicar, F., Manara, S., Zolfo, M., Truong, D. T., Scholz, M., Armanini, F., et al. (2017). Studying vertical microbiome transmission from mothers to infants by strain-level metagenomic profiling. mSystems 2, e00164–e00116. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00164-16

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bai, Y., Tao, J., Zhou, J., Fan, Q., Liu, M., Hu, Y., et al. (2018). Fucosylated human Milk oligosaccharides and N-Glycans in the Milk of Chinese mothers regulate the gut microbiome of their breast-fed infants during different lactation stages. mSystems 3, 1–19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00206-18

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Benito, D., Lozano, C., Jimenez, E., Albújar, M., Gomez, A., Rodríguez, J. M., et al. (2015). Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from faeces of healthy neonates and potential mother-to-infant microbial transmission through breastfeeding. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 91:pii: fiv007. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiv007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Biagi, E., Aceti, A., Quercia, S., Beghetti, I., Rampelli, S., Turroni, S., et al. (2018). Microbial community dynamics in mother’s milk and infant’s mouth and gut in moderately preterm infants. Front. Microbiol. 9:2512. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02512

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Binns, C., Lee, M., and Low, W. Y. (2016). The long-term public health benefits of breastfeeding. Asia Pacific J. Public Health 28, 7–14. doi: 10.1177/1010539515624964

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cabrera-Rubio, R., Collado, M. C., Laitinen, K., Salminen, S., Isolauri, E., and Mira, A. (2012). The human milk microbiome changes over lactation and is shaped by maternal weight and mode of delivery. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 96, 544–551. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.037382

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cabrera-Rubio, R., Mira-Pascual, L., Mira, A., and Collado, M. C. (2016). Impact of mode of delivery on the milk microbiota composition of healthy women. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 7, 54–60. doi: 10.1017/S2040174415001397

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Collado, M. C., Laitinen, K., Salminen, S., and Isolauri, E. (2012). Maternal weight and excessive weight gain during pregnancy modify the immunomodulatory potential of breast milk. Pediatr. Res. 72, 77–85. doi: 10.1038/pr.2012.42

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cortes-Macías, E., Selma-Royo, M., García-Mantrana, I., Calatayud, M., González, S., Martínez-Costa, C., et al. (2021). Maternal diet shapes the breast Milk microbiota composition and diversity: impact of mode of delivery and antibiotic exposure. J. Nutr. 151, 330–340. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ding, M., Qi, C., Yang, Z., Jiang, S., Bi, Y., Lai, J., et al. (2019). Geographical location specific composition of cultured microbiota and: lactobacillus occurrence in human breast milk in China. Food Funct. 10, 554–564. doi: 10.1039/c8fo02182a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Drago, L., Toscano, M., De Grandi, R., Grossi, E., Padovani, E. M., and Peroni, D. G. (2017). Microbiota network and mathematic microbe mutualism in colostrum and mature milk collected in two different geographic areas: Italy versus Burundi. ISME J. 11, 875–884. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.183

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Edgar, R. C. (2010). Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fehr, K., Moossavi, S., Sbihi, H., Boutin, R. C. T., Bode, L., Robertson, B., et al. (2020). Breastmilk feeding practices are associated with the co-occurrence of bacteria in mothers’ Milk and the infant gut: the CHILD cohort study. Cell Host Microbe 28, 285–297.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.06.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferraris, C., Elli, M., and Tagliabue, A. (2020). Gut microbiota for health: how can diet maintain a healthy gut microbiota? Nutrients 12:3596. doi: 10.3390/nu12113596

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fouhy, F., Ross, R. P., Fitzgerald, G. F., Stanton, C., and Cotter, P. D. (2012). Composition of the early intestinal microbiota. Gut Microbes 3, 203–220. doi: 10.4161/gmic.20169

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gertosio, C., Meazza, C., Pagani, S., and Bozzola, M. (2016). Breastfeeding and its gamut of benefits. Minerva Pediatr. 68, 201–212.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Goldman, A. S. (2012). Evolution of immune functions of the mammary gland and protection of the infant. Breastfeed. Med. 7, 132–142. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2012.0025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

González, R., Mandomando, I., Fumadó, V., Sacoor, C., Macete, E., Alonso, P. L., et al. (2013). Breast Milk and gut microbiota in African mothers and infants from an area of high HIV prevalence. PLoS One 8:e80299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080299

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grönlund, M.-M., Gueimonde, M., Laitinen, K., Kociubinski, G., Grönroos, T., Salminen, S., et al. (2007). Maternal breast-milk and intestinal bifidobacteria guide the compositional development of the Bifidobacterium microbiota in infants at risk of allergic disease. Clin Exp Allergy 37, 1764–1772. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02849.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heikkila, M. P., and Saris, P. E. J. (2003). Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus by the commensal bacteria of human milk. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95, 471–478. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02002.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hill, C. J., Lynch, D. B., Murphy, K., Ulaszewska, M., Jeffery, I. B., O’Shea, C. A., et al. (2017). Evolution of gut microbiota composition from birth to 24 weeks in the INFANTMET cohort. Microbiome 5:4. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0213-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hooper, L. V., and Macpherson, A. J. (2010). Immune adaptations that maintain homeostasis with the intestinal microbiota. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 159–169. doi: 10.1038/nri2710

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hornung, B. V. H., Zwittink, R. D., and Kuijper, E. J. (2019). Issues and current standards of controls in microbiome research. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 95:fiz045. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiz045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hunt, K. M., Foster, J. A., Forney, L. J., Schütte, U. M. E., Beck, D. L., Abdo, Z., et al. (2011). Characterization of the diversity and temporal stability of bacterial communities in human Milk. PLoS One 6:e21313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021313

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, J., Wu, K., Yu, Z., Ren, Y., Zhao, Y., Jiang, Y., et al. (2016). Changes in fatty acid composition of human milk over lactation stages and relationship with dietary intake in Chinese women. Food Funct. 7, 3154–3162. doi: 10.1039/C6FO00304D

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, T., Zhao, J., Liu, B., Dai, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, J., et al. (2018). Progress in a birth cohort of maternal and infant nutrition/ health in China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 63, 3961–3967. doi: 10.1360/N972018-00332

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jost, T., Lacroix, C., Braegger, C. P., Rochat, F., and Chassard, C. (2014). Vertical mother-neonate transfer of maternal gut bacteria via breastfeeding: mother-neonate bacterial transfer. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 2891–2904. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12238

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khodayar-Pardo, P., Mira-Pascual, L., Collado, M. C., and Martínez-Costa, C. (2014). Impact of lactation stage, gestational age and mode of delivery on breast milk microbiota. J. Perinatol. 34, 599–605. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.47

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, H., Toit, E.Du, Kulkarni, A., Aakko, J., Linderborg, K. M., Zhang, Y., et al. (2016). Distinct patterns in human Milk microbiota and fatty acid profiles across specific geographic locations. Front. Microbiol. 7:1619. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01619

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S.-W., Watanabe, K., Hsu, C.-C., Chao, S.-H., Yang, Z.-H., Lin, Y.-J., et al. (2017). Bacterial composition and diversity in breast Milk samples from mothers living in Taiwan and mainland China. Front. Microbiol. 8:965. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00965

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, C., Cui, Y., Li, X., and Yao, M. (2021). Microeco: an R package for data mining in microbial community ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 97, 1–19. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa255

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lyons, K. E., Shea, C. A. O., Grimaud, G., Ryan, C. A., Dempsey, E., Kelly, A. L., et al. (2022). The human milk microbiome aligns with lactation stage and not birth mode. Sci. Rep. 12, 5598–5514. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09009-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martín, R., Langa, S., Reviriego, C., Jimínez, E., Marín, M. L., Xaus, J., et al. (2003). Human milk is a source of lactic acid bacteria for the infant gut. J. Pediatr. 143, 754–758. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.09.028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mastromarino, P., Capobianco, D., Campagna, G., Laforgia, N., Drimaco, P., Dileone, A., et al. (2014). Correlation between lactoferrin and beneficial microbiota in breast milk and infant’s feces. Biometals 27, 1077–1086. doi: 10.1007/s10534-014-9762-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mazurier, E., Rigourd, V., Perez, P., Buffin, R., Couedelo, L., Vaysse, C., et al. (2017). Effects of maternal supplementation with Omega-3 precursors on human Milk composition. J. Hum. Lact. 33, 319–328. doi: 10.1177/0890334417691946

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moossavi, S., Sepehri, S., Robertson, B., Bode, L., Goruk, S., Field, C. J., et al. (2019). Composition and variation of the human Milk microbiota are influenced by maternal and early-life factors. Cell Host Microbe 25, 324–335.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ojo-Okunola, A., and Nicol, M., and Toit, E. du (2018). Human breast Milk Bacteriome in health and disease. Nutrients 10,:1643. doi: 10.3390/nu10111643

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Olivares, M., Albrecht, S., De Palma, G., Ferrer, M. D., Castillejo, G., Schols, H. A., et al. (2015). Human milk composition differs in healthy mothers and mothers with celiac disease. Eur. J. Nutr. 54, 119–128. doi: 10.1007/s00394-014-0692-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pannaraj, P. S., Li, F., Cerini, C., Bender, J. M., Yang, S., Rollie, A., et al. (2017). Association between breast Milk bacterial communities and establishment and development of the infant gut microbiome. JAMA Pediatr. 171, 647–654. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0378

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Perez, P. F., Dore, J., Leclerc, M., Levenez, F., Benyacoub, J., Serrant, P., et al. (2007). Bacterial imprinting of the neonatal immune system: lessons from maternal cells? Pediatrics 119, e724–e732. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pérez-Cano, F. J., Dong, H., and Yaqoob, P. (2010). In vitro immunomodulatory activity of Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 and Lactobacillus salivarius CECT5713: two probiotic strains isolated from human breast milk. Immunobiology 215, 996–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2010.01.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Redondo-Useros, N., Nova, E., González-Zancada, N., Díaz, L. E., Gómez-Martínez, S., and Marcos, A. (2020). Microbiota and lifestyle: a special focus on diet. Nutrients 12:1776. doi: 10.3390/nu12061776

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C., and Mahé, F. (2016). VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4:e2409v1. doi: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2409v1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sakwinska, O., Moine, D., Delley, M., Combremont, S., Rezzonico, E., Descombes, P., et al. (2016). Microbiota in breast Milk of Chinese lactating mothers. PLoS One 11:e0160856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160856

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanjulián, L., Lamas, A., Barreiro, R., Cepeda, A., Fente, C. A., and Regal, P. (2021). Bacterial diversity of breast Milk in healthy Spanish women: evolution from birth to five years postpartum. Nutrients 13:2414. doi: 10.3390/nu13072414

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Soto, A., Martín, V., Jiménez, E., Mader, I., Rodríguez, J. M., and Fernández, L. (2014). Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria in human breast Milk. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 59, 78–88. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000347

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Urbaniak, C., Angelini, M., Gloor, G. B., and Reid, G. (2016). Human milk microbiota profiles in relation to birthing method, gestation and infant gender. Microbiome 4:1. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0145-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wan, Y., Jiang, J., Lu, M., Tong, W., Zhou, R., Li, J., et al. (2020). Human milk microbiota development during lactation and its relation to maternal geographic location and gestational hypertensive status. Gut Microbes 11, 1438–1449. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1760711

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, M., and Donovan, S. M. (2015). Human microbiota-associated swine: current Progress and future opportunities. ILAR J. 56, 63–73. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilv006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M., and Cole, J. R. (2007). Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xue, Y., Campos-Giménez, E., Redeuil, K., Lévèques, A., Actis-Goretta, L., Vinyes-Pares, G., et al. (2017). Concentrations of carotenoids and tocopherols in breast Milk from urban Chinese mothers and their associations with maternal characteristics: a cross-sectional study. Nutrients 9:1229. doi: 10.3390/nu9111229

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Q., Liang, Q., Balakrishnan, B., Belobrajdic, D. P., Feng, Q.-J., and Zhang, W. (2020). Role of dietary nutrients in the modulation of gut microbiota: a narrative review. Nutrients 12:381. doi: 10.3390/nu12020381

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Zhang, M., Lin, T., Zhao, J., Luo, Z., Hou, J., et al. (2021). Relationship between traditional maternal diet pattern and breastmilk composition of rural lactating women during the first month postpartum in Shigatse, Tibet. Food Sci. Nutr. 9, 4185–4198. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, J., Wittouck, S., Salvetti, E., Franz, C. M. A. P., Harris, H. M. B., Mattarelli, P., et al. (2020). A taxonomic note on the genus lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 70, 2782–2858. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zimmermann, P., and Curtis, N. (2020). Breast milk microbiota: a review of the factors that influence composition. J. Infect. 81, 17–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.01.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: breast milk, influencing factor, microbiome, maternal, postpartum, diet

Citation: Liu B, Zhao J, Liu Y, Qiao W, Jiang T and Chen L (2022) Diversity and temporal dynamics of breast milk microbiome and its influencing factors in Chinese women during the first 6 months postpartum. Front. Microbiol. 13:1016759. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1016759

Received: 11 August 2022; Accepted: 19 October 2022;
Published: 11 November 2022.

Edited by:

Eugenia Bezirtzoglou, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece

Reviewed by:

Ping Li, Zhejiang Gongshang University, China
Patricia Regal, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Copyright © 2022 Liu, Zhao, Liu, Qiao, Jiang and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Lijun Chen, Y2hlbmxpanVuQHNhbnl1YW4uY29tLmNu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.